A mutation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor impairs agonist activation of adenylyl cyclase without affecting high affinity agonist binding. Distinct molecular determinants of the receptor are involved in physical coupling to and functional activation of Gs

Activation of guanyl nucleotide regulatory proteins (G proteins) by hormones and neurotransmitters appears to require the formation of high affinity agonist-receptor-G protein ternary complexes. In the case of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor, multiple regions of the molecule have been implicated in coupling to the stimulatory G protein Gs. This finding raises the possibility that discrete regions of the receptor mediate ternary complex formation, whereas different loci may be involved in other aspects of G protein activation. To date, however, mutagenesis studies with the beta 2-adrenergic receptor have not clarified this question since mutant receptors with impaired abilities to activate Gs have generally possessed a diminished capacity to form the ternary complex as assessed in binding assays. We have expressed in a mammalian cell line a mutant beta 2-adrenergic receptor comprising a seven-amino acid deletion in the carboxyl-terminal region of its third cytoplasmic loop (D267-273), a region proposed to be critically involved in coupling to Gs. When tested with beta-adrenergic agonists, the maximal adenylyl cyclase response mediated by this mutant receptor was less than one-half of that seen with the wild-type receptor. Nevertheless, D267-273 exhibited high affinity agonist binding identical to that of the wild-type receptor. In addition, agonist-induced sequestration of the receptor, a property not mediated by Gs, was also normal. These findings indicate that the formation of high affinity agonist-receptor-Gs complexes is not sufficient to fully activate Gs. Instead, an additional stimulatory signal appears to be required from the receptor. Our data thereby suggest that the molecular determinants of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor involved in formation of the ternary complex are not identical to those that transmit the agonist-induced stimulatory signal to Gs.     

Functionally different agonists induce distinct conformations in the G protein coupling domain of the beta 2 adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors represent the largest class of drug discovery targets. Drugs that activate G protein-coupled receptors are classified as either agonists or partial agonists. To study the mechanism whereby these different classes of activating ligands modulate receptor function, we directly monitored ligand-induced conformational changes in the G protein-coupling domain of the beta(2) adrenergic receptor. Fluorescence lifetime analysis of a reporter fluorophore covalently attached to this domain revealed that, in the absence of ligands, this domain oscillates around a single detectable conformation. Binding to an antagonist does not change this conformation but does reduce the flexibility of the domain. However, when the beta(2) adrenergic receptor is bound to a full agonist, the G protein coupling domain exists in two distinct conformations. Moreover, the conformations induced by a full agonist can be distinguished from those induced by partial agonists. These results provide new insight into the structural consequence of antagonist binding and the basis of agonism and partial agonism.     

Activation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor-Galpha(s) complex leads to rapid depalmitoylation and inhibition of repalmitoylation of both the receptor and Galpha(s).

Palmitoylation is unique among lipid modifications in that it is reversible. In recent years, dynamic palmitoylation of G protein alpha subunits and of their cognate receptors has attracted considerable attention. However, very little is known concerning the acylation/deacylation cycle of the proteins in relation to their activity status. In particular, the relative contribution of the activation and desensitization of the signaling unit to the regulation of the receptors and G proteins palmitoylation state is unknown. To address this issue, we took advantage of the fact that a fusion protein composed of the stimulatory alpha subunit of trimeric G protein (Galpha(s)) covalently attached to the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) as a carboxyl-terminal extension (beta(2)AR-Galpha(s)) can be stimulated by agonists but does not undergo rapid inactivation, desensitization, or internalization. When expressed in Sf9 cells, both the receptor and the Galpha(s) moieties of the fusion protein were found to be palmitoylated via thioester linkage. Stimulation with the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol led to a rapid depalmitoylation of both the beta(2)AR and Galpha(s) and inhibited repalmitoylation. The extent of depalmitoylation induced by a series of agonists was correlated (0.99) with their intrinsic efficacy to stimulate the adenylyl cyclase activity. However, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production did not affect the palmitoylation state of beta(2)AR-Galpha(s), indicating that the agonist-promoted depalmitoylation is linked to conformational changes and not to second messenger generation. Given that, upon activation, the fusion protein mimics the activated receptor-G protein complex but cannot undergo desensitization, the data demonstrate that early steps in the activation process lead to the depalmitoylation of both receptor and G protein and that repalmitoylation requires later events that cannot be accommodated by the activated fusion protein.     

Kinetics of ternary complex formation with fusion proteins composed of the A(1)-adenosine receptor and G protein alpha-subunits.

High affinity agonist binding to G protein-coupled receptors depends on the formation of a ternary complex between agonist, receptor, and G protein. This process is too slow to be accounted for by a simple diffusion-controlled mechanism. We have tested if the interaction between activated receptor and G protein is rate-limiting by fusing the coding sequence of the human A(1)-adenosine receptor to that of Galpha(i-1) (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)) and of Galpha(o) (A(1)/Galpha(o)). Fusion proteins of the expected molecular mass were detected following transfection of HEK293 cells. Ternary complex formation was monitored by determining the kinetics for binding of the high affinity agonist (-)-N(6)-3[(125)I](iodo-4-hydroxyphenylisopropyl)adenosine; these were similar in the wild-type receptor and the fusion proteins over the temperature range of 10 to 30 degrees C. Agonist dissociation may be limited by the stability of the ternary complex. This assumption was tested by creating fusion proteins in which the Cys(351) of Galpha(i-1) was replaced with glycine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351G) or isoleucine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351I) to lower the affinity of the receptor for the G protein. In these mutated fusion proteins, the dissociation rate of the ternary complex was accelerated; in contrast, the rate of the forward reaction was not affected. We therefore conclude that (i) receptor activation per se rather than its interaction with the G protein is rate-limiting in ternary complex formation; (ii) the stability of the ternary complex is determined by the dissociation rate of the G protein. These features provide for a kinetic proofreading mechanism that sustains the fidelity of receptor-G protein coupling.     

Novel mutants of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor reveal amino acids relevant for receptor activation

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors like the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor results in conformational changes that ultimately lead to signal propagation through a G protein to an effector like adenylyl cyclase. In this study we identified amino acids that seem to be critical for activation of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor. Activation patterns of mutant receptors were analyzed using two structurally different ligands for beta-adrenergic receptors that both are mixed agonist/antagonists. Broxaterol and terbutaline are agonists at beta(2)- and beta(3)-receptors; however, they act as antagonists at the beta(1)-subtype. We reasoned that this functional selectivity may be reflected by a corresponding sequence pattern in the receptor subtypes. Therefore, we exchanged single amino acids of the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor for residues that were identical in the beta(2)- and beta(3)-subtypes but different in the beta(1)-receptor. Pharmacological characterization of such receptor mutants revealed that binding of a panel of agonists and antagonists including broxaterol and terbutaline was unaltered. However, two of the mutants (I185V and D212N) were activated by broxaterol and terbutaline, which acted as antagonists at the wild-type receptor. Two additional mutants (V120L and K253R) could be activated by terbutaline alone, which is structurally more closely related to endogenous catecholamines like epinephrine than to broxaterol. A model of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor showed that the four gain-of-function mutations are outside of the putative ligand-binding domain substantiating the lack of an effect of the mutations on binding characteristics. These results support the notion that Val-120, Ile-185, Asp-212, and Lys-253 are critically involved in conformational changes occurring during receptor activation.     

Functional reconstitution of Beta2-adrenergic receptors utilizing self-assembling Nanodisc technology

Integral membrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) compose the single most prolific class of drug targets, yet significant functional and structural questions remain unanswered for this superfamily. A primary reason for this gap in understanding arises from the difficulty of forming soluble, monodisperse receptor membrane preparations that maintain the transmembrane signaling activity of the receptor and provide robust biophysical and biochemical assay systems. Here we report a technique for self-assembling functional beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) into a nanoscale phospholipid bilayer system (Nanodisc) that is highly soluble in aqueous solution. The approximately 10-nm nanobilayer particles contain beta2AR in a native-like phospholipid bilayer domain of approximately 100 phospholipid molecules circumferentially bound by a membrane scaffold protein (MSP). The resulting construct allows for access to the physiologically intracellular and extracellular faces of the receptor and thus allows unrestricted access of antagonists, agonists, and G proteins. These Nanodisc-solubilized GPCRs can be directly purified by normal chromatographic procedures. We define the resultant Nanodisc-embedded monomeric beta2AR by antagonist and agonist binding isotherms and demonstrate faithful G protein coupling.     

Identification of an allosteric binding site for Zn2+ on the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be modulated by a diverse spectrum of drugs ranging from full agonists to partial agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists. The vast majority of these ligands compete with native ligands for binding to orthosteric binding sites. Allosteric ligands have also been described for a number of GPCRs. However, little is known about the mechanism by which these ligands modulate the affinity of receptors for orthosteric ligands. We have previously reported that Zn(II) acts as a positive allosteric modulator of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR). To identify the Zn(2+) binding site responsible for the enhancement of agonist affinity in the beta(2)AR, we mutated histidines located in hydrophilic sequences bridging the seven transmembrane domains. Mutation of His-269 abolished the effect of Zn(2+) on agonist affinity. Mutations of other histidines had no effect on agonist affinity. Further mutagenesis of residues adjacent to His-269 demonstrated that Cys-265 and Glu-225 are also required to achieve the full allosteric effect of Zn(2+) on agonist binding. Our results suggest that bridging of the cytoplasmic extensions of TM5 and TM6 by Zn(2+) facilitates agonist binding. These results are in agreement with recent biophysical studies demonstrating that agonist binding leads to movement of TM6 relative to TM5.     

Fusion of beta 2-adrenergic receptor to G alpha s in mammalian cells: identification of a specific signal transduction species not characteristic of constitutive activation or precoupling

The forward and antegrade interactions that comprise the agonist receptor-G protein complex were studied in Chinese hamster fibroblasts transfected to express the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR), the beta(2)AR and the alpha-subunit of its cognate G protein (G(s)), and a protein consisting of the beta(2)AR fused at its carboxy terminus with G(alpha)(s) (beta(2)AR-G(s)). Expression levels were matched at approximately 600 fmol/mg. Basal adenylyl cyclase activities were increased with the fusion receptor membranes compared to coexpressed receptor plus G(alpha)(s), and to wild-type beta(2)AR (20.5 +/- 1.8 vs 9.0 +/- 0.88 vs 8.7 +/- 0.93 pmol min(-)(1) mg(-)(1)), confirming in mammalian cells that the fusion of beta(2)AR and G(alpha)(s) results in a state not attained by expression of unfused components. However, agonist-stimulated activities were not increased proportionally, such that the stimulation over basal of the beta(2)AR-G(s) fusion protein (1. 5-fold) was less than wild-type beta(2)AR (2.1-fold). Agonist competition studies performed in the absence of guanine nucleotide exhibited high-affinity binding sites with a lower K(H) (1.75 vs 8. 47 nM) and greater %R(H) (51% vs 44%) for beta(2)AR-G(s), but GppNHp failed to convert most of these to the low-affinity state. Functional studies with the inverse agonist ICI 118551 did not show enhanced efficacy or potency with the fusion protein. Adenylyl cyclase studies with three partial agonists with diverse structures (dobutamine, ritodrine, and phenylephrine) showed no enhancement of efficacy with beta(2)AR-G(s) and a minor trend toward enhanced potency. Taken together, these results indicate that the tethering of G(alpha)(s) to the beta(2)AR causes a conformational change in the receptor that stabilizes a species "trapped" between the non-guanine nucleotide-bound state and the GTP-bound form. Functionally the receptor is not characterized by a consistent pattern of properties ascribed to other states such as constitutive activation or precoupling, but rather represents a unique state in the transition from high- to low-affinity forms.     

Characterization of ligand-induced conformational states in the beta 2 adrenergic receptor

Drugs acting at G protein coupled receptors can be classified in biological assays as either agonists, partial agonists, neutral antagonists, or as inverse agonists. Very little is known about the actual molecular events and structural changes that occur in the receptor following ligand binding and during transmission of a signal across the membrane. Therefore, the structural basis for the biological classification of drug action remains unknown. To date, the conformational state of G protein coupled receptors has been inferred from the activity of the effector enzyme modulated by the G protein. We have used two different approaches to monitor conformational changes in beta 2 adrenergic receptor. Fluorescence spectroscopy can be used to directly monitor structural changes in purified beta 2 adrenergic receptor in real-time. The emission from many fluorescent molecules is strongly dependent on the polarity of the environment in which they are located. Thus, fluorescent probes covalently bound to proteins can be used as sensitive indicators of conformational changes and protein-protein interactions. In addition, we examined functional differences between agonists and partial agonists using fusion proteins between wild-type beta 2 receptor or a constitutively active beta 2 receptor mutant and Gs alpha. These receptor-G protein fusion proteins guarantee highly efficient coupling with a defined stoichiometry. The results of these experiments will be discussed in the context of current models of G protein coupled receptor activation.     

The nature of the arrestin x receptor complex determines the ultimate fate of the internalized receptor

The vast majority of G protein-coupled receptors are desensitized by a uniform two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of an active receptor followed by arrestin binding. The arrestin x receptor complex is then internalized. Internalized receptor can be recycled back to the plasma membrane (resensitization) or targeted to lysosomes for degradation (down-regulation). The intracellular compartment where this choice is made and the molecular mechanisms involved are largely unknown. Here we used two arrestin2 mutants that bind with high affinity to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated agonist-activated beta 2-adrenergic receptor to manipulate the receptor-arrestin interface. We found that mutants support rapid internalization of beta 2-adrenergic receptor similar to wild type arrestin2. At the same time, phosphorylation-independent arrestin2 mutants facilitate receptor recycling and sharply reduce the rate of receptor loss, effectively protecting beta 2-adrenergic receptor from down-regulation even after very long (up to 24 h) agonist exposure. Phosphorylation-independent arrestin2 mutants dramatically reduce receptor phosphorylation in response to an agonist both in vitro and in cells. Interestingly, co-expression of high levels of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase restores receptor down-regulation in the presence of mutants to the levels observed with wild type arrestin2. Our data suggest that unphosphorylated receptor internalized in complex with mutant arrestins recycles faster than phosphoreceptor and is less likely to get degraded. Thus, targeted manipulation of the characteristics of an arrestin protein that binds to a G protein-coupled receptors can dramatically change receptor trafficking and its ultimate fate in a cell.     

beta-arrestin-biased agonism at the beta2-adrenergic receptor

Classically, the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR) and other members of the seven-transmembrane receptor (7TMR) superfamily activate G protein-dependent signaling pathways in response to ligand stimulus. It has recently been discovered, however, that a number of 7TMRs, including beta 2AR, can signal via beta-arrestin-dependent pathways independent of G protein activation. It is currently unclear if among beta 2AR agonists there exist ligands that disproportionately signal via G proteins or beta-arrestins and are hence "biased." Using a variety of approaches that include highly sensitive fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based methodologies, including a novel assay for receptor internalization, we show that the majority of known beta 2AR agonists exhibit relative efficacies for beta-arrestin-associated activities (beta-arrestin membrane translocation and beta 2AR internalization) identical to the irrelative efficacies for G protein-dependent signaling (cyclic AMP generation). However, for three betaAR ligands there is a marked bias toward beta-arrestin signaling; these ligands stimulate beta-arrestin-dependent receptor activities to a much greater extent than would be expected given their efficacy for G protein-dependent activity. Structural comparison of these biased ligands reveals that all three are catecholamines containing an ethyl substitution on the alpha-carbon, a motif absent on all of the other, unbiased ligands tested. Thus, these studies demonstrate the potential for developing a novel class of 7TMR ligands with a distinct bias for beta-arrestin-mediated signaling.     

Rapid-mix flow cytometry measurements of subsecond regulation of G protein-coupled receptor ternary complex dynamics by guanine nucleotides

We have used rapid-mix flow cytometry to analyze the early subsecond dynamics of the disassembly of ternary complexes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) immobilized on beads to examine individual steps associated with guanine nucleotide activation. Our earlier studies suggested that the slow dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits was unlikely to be an essential component of cell activation. However, these studies did not have adequate time resolution to define precisely the disassembly kinetics. Ternary complexes were assembled using three formyl peptide receptor constructs (wild type, formyl peptide receptor-Galpha(i2) fusion, and formyl peptide receptor-green fluorescent protein fusion) and two isotypes of the alpha subunit (alpha(i2) and alpha(i3)) and betagamma dimer (beta(1)gamma(2) and beta(4)gamma(2)). At saturating nucleotide levels, the disassembly of a significant fraction of ternary complexes occurred on a subsecond time frame for alpha(i2) complexes and tau(1/2)< or =4s for alpha(i3) complexes, time scales that are compatible with cell activation. beta(1)gamma(2) isotype complexes were generally more stable than beta(4)gamma(2)-associated complexes. The comparison of the three constructs, however, proved that the fast step was associated with the separation of receptor and G protein and that the dissociation of the ligand or of the alpha and betagamma subunits was slower. These results are compatible with a cell activation model involving G protein conformational changes rather than disassembly of Galphabetagamma heterotrimer.     

Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.     

The putative beta4-adrenergic receptor is a novel state of the beta1-adrenergic receptor

The atypical beta3-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist CGP-12177 has been used to define a novel atypical beta-AR subtype, the putative beta4-AR. Recent evaluation of recombinant beta-AR subtypes and beta-AR-deficient mice, however, has established the identity of the pharmacological beta4-AR as a novel state of the beta1-AR protein. The ability of aryloxypropanolamine ligands like CGP-12177 to independently interact with agonist and antagonist states of the beta1-AR has important implications regarding receptor classification and the potential development of tissue-specific beta-AR agonists.     

Seven transmembrane receptor core signaling complexes are assembled prior to plasma membrane trafficking

Much is known about beta2-adrenergic receptor trafficking and internalization following prolonged agonist stimulation. However, less is known about outward trafficking of the beta2-adrenergic receptor to the plasma membrane or the role that trafficking might play in the assembly of receptor signaling complexes, important for targeting, specificity, and rapidity of subsequent signaling events. Here, by using a combination of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, bimolecular fluorescence complementation, and confocal microscopy, we evaluated the steps in the formation of the core receptor-G protein heterotrimer complex. By using dominant negative Rab and Sar GTPase constructs, we demonstrate that receptor dimers and receptor-G betagamma complexes initially associate in the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas G alpha subunits are added to the complex during endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transit. We also observed that G protein heterotrimers adopt different trafficking itineraries when expressed alone or with stoichiometric co-expression with receptor. Furthermore, deliberate mistargeting of specific components of these complexes leads to diversion of other members from their normal subcellular localization, confirming the role of these early interactions in targeting and formation of specific signaling complexes.     

Analysis of the AU-rich elements in the 3'-untranslated region of beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA by mutagenesis and identification of the homologous AU-rich region from different species

The 35000-Mr beta-adrenergic receptor mRNA binding protein (beta ARB) is induced by beta-adrenergic agonists and binds to G-protein-linked receptor mRNAs that exhibit agonist-induced destabilization. Recently, we identified a 20-nucleotide, AU-rich region in the 3'-untranslated region of the hamster beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA consisting of an AUUUUA hexamer flanked by U-rich regions, which constitutes the binding domain for beta ARB. U to G substitution in the hexamer region attenuates the binding of beta ARB, whereas U to G substitution of hexamer and flanking U-rich domains abolishes binding of beta ARB and stabilizes beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA levels in transfectant clones challenged with either isoproterenol or cyclic AMP. In the study presented here, we mutated the 20-nucleotide ARE region to establish the minimal AU-rich sequence required for beta ARB binding. U to G substitutions of flanking poly(U) regions and of the hexamer established the nature of the binding properties. Using various mutants, we demonstrated also that binding of beta ARB correlates with the extent of destabilization of beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA in response to agonist stimulation. High-affinity binding of hamster, rat, mouse, porcine, and human ARE sequences to beta ARB was revealed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis following UV-catalyzed cross-linking and by gel mobility shift assays. Further, beta ARB was shown to bind more avidly to the 20-nucleotide ARE region than to well-established mRNA destablization sequences of tandem repeats of five pentamers. Thus, for beta 2-adrenergic receptor, mRNA destabilization likely occurs via conserved AU-rich elements present in the 3'-untranslated regions of receptor mRNAs.     

Ligand-dependent perturbation of the conformational ensemble for the GPCR β2 adrenergic receptor revealed by HDX

Mechanism of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation and their modulation by functionally distinct ligands remains elusive. Using the technique of amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry, we examined the ligand-induced changes in conformational states and stability within the beta-2-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR). Differential HDX reveals ligand-specific alterations in the energy landscape of the receptor's conformational ensemble. The inverse agonists timolol and carazolol were found to be most stabilizing even compared with the antagonist alprenolol, notably in intracellular regions where G proteins are proposed to bind, while the agonist isoproterenol induced the largest degree of conformational mobility. The partial agonist clenbuterol displayed conformational effects found in both the inverse agonists and the agonist. This study highlights the?regional plasticity of the receptor and characterizes unique conformations spanning the entire receptor sequence stabilized by functionally selective ligands, all of which differ from the profile for the apo receptor.     

Beta-adrenergic agonists that down-regulate receptor mRNA up-regulate a M(r) 35,000 protein(s) that selectively binds to beta-adrenergic receptor mRNAs.

In an effort to explore the molecular basis for agonist-induced destabilization of beta-adrenergic receptor mRNA, we investigated the nature of RNA-binding proteins both in untreated and agonist-treated DDT1-MF2 smooth muscle cells. Messenger RNAs for the alpha 1b-, beta 1-, and beta 2-adrenergic receptors as well as for beta-globin were transcribed in vitro, incubated with cytosolic fractions, covalently cross-linked by short-wave UV light, and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A prominent M(r) 35,000 radiolabeled protein(s) with the following characteristics was identified: (i) binds selectively to beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNAs, both of which undergo agonist-induced down-regulation; (ii) does not bind to either alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor mRNA, which does not undergo agonist induced down-regulation, or to beta-globin mRNA; (iii) displays binding to beta 2-adrenergic receptor mRNA that is selectively competed by poly(U) RNA, but not poly(A), -(C), or -(G) RNA; and (iv) displays binding to receptor mRNA that can be competed by RNA harboring destabilizer sequences that are AU-rich and AUUUA pentamer-rich. The abundance of the M(r) 35,000 RNA-binding protein selective for beta-adrenergic receptor message, a factor we term beta ARB protein, varies inversely with the level of receptor mRNA, being induced by agonists that down-regulate receptor mRNA.     

GPCR-induced dissociation of G-protein subunits in early stage signal transduction

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) form a ternary complex of agonist, receptor and G-proteins during primary signal transduction at the cell membrane. Downstream signalling is thought to be preceded by the process of dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits, thus exposing new surfaces to interact with downstream effectors. We demonstrate here for the first time, the dissociation of heterotrimeric G-protein subunits (i.e., Galpha and Gbetagamma) following agonist-induced GPCR (alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor; alpha(2A)-AR) activation in a cell-free assay system. alpha(2A)-AR membranes were reconstituted with the G-proteins (+/-hexahistidine-tagged) Galpha(i1) and Gbeta1gamma2 and functional signalling was determined following activation of the reconstituted receptor:G-protein complex with the potent agonist UK-14304, and [35S]GTPgammaS. In the presence of Ni(2+)-coated agarose beads, the activated his-tagged Galpha(i1)his-[35S]GTPgammaS complex was captured on the Ni(2+)-presenting surface. When his-tagged Gbeta1gamma2 (Gbeta1gamma2his) was used with Galpha(i1), the [35S]GTPgammaS-bound Galpha(i1) was not present on the Ni(2+)-coated beads, but rather, it was separated from the beta1gamma2(his)-beads, demonstrating receptor-induced dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. Treatment of the reconstituted alpha(2A)-AR membranes containing Gbeta1gamma2his:Galpha(i1) with imidazole confirmed the specificity for the Ni2+:G-protein surface dissociation of Galpha(i1) from Gbeta1gamma2his. These data demonstrate for the first time, the complete dissociation of the G-protein subunits and extend observations on the role of G-proteins in the assembly and disassembly of the ternary complex in the primary events of GPCR signalling.     

Effects of partial agonists and Mg2+ ions on the interaction of M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and G protein Galpha i1 subunit in the M2-Galpha i1 fusion protein

We have expressed a M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein in insect cells, in which the G protein alpha(i1) subunit was fused with a mutant of the muscarinic receptor M(2) subtype without glycosylation sites and the central part of the third intracellular loop. The M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein showed GTP-sensitive, high-affinity agonist binding. Displacement curves by GDP of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding shifted to the right in the presence of muscarinic agonists. The extent of the shift was greater for full agonists (120-150 fold) than for partial agonists (25-35 fold), and virtually no shift was observed for antagonists. The affinity for GDP decreased with increasing MgCl(2) concentration in the presence of an agonist but was not affected by MgCl(2) in the presence of an antagonist. These results indicate that the apparent affinity for GDP of the M(2)-Galpha(i1) fusion protein bound to a ligand represents the efficacy of the given ligand, and that Mg(2+) is required for the agonist-bound M(2) to interact with Galpha(i1), reducing its affinity for GDP. We propose that the agonist-M(2)-Galpha(i1) complex represents the transition state for the GDP-GTP exchange reaction catalyzed by agonist-bound receptors, and that the complex has different affinities for GDP depending on the species of the ligand bound to M(2) receptors.