Swapping the domains of exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R: conferring upon RNase II the ability to degrade ds RNA

RNase II and RNase R are the two E. coli exoribonucleases that belong to the RNase II super family of enzymes. They degrade RNA hydrolytically in the 3' to 5' direction in a processive and sequence independent manner. However, while RNase R is capable of degrading structured RNAs, the RNase II activity is impaired by dsRNAs. The final end-product of these two enzymes is also different, being 4 nt for RNase II and 2 nt for RNase R. RNase II and RNase R share structural properties, including 60% of amino acid sequence similarity and have a similar modular domain organization: two N-terminal cold shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2), one central RNB catalytic domain, and one C-terminal S1 domain. We have constructed hybrid proteins by swapping the domains between RNase II and RNase R to determine which are the responsible for the differences observed between RNase R and RNase II. The results obtained show that the S1 and RNB domains from RNase R in an RNase II context allow the degradation of double-stranded substrates and the appearance of the 2 nt long end-product. Moreover, the degradation of structured RNAs becomes tail-independent when the RNB domain from RNase R is no longer associated with the RNA binding domains (CSD and S1) of the genuine protein. Finally, we show that the RNase R C-terminal Lysine-rich region is involved in the degradation of double-stranded substrates in an RNase II context, probably by unwinding the substrate before it enters into the catalytic cavity.     

The Roles of Individual Domains of RNase R in Substrate Binding and Exoribonuclease Activity: THE NUCLEASE DOMAIN IS SUFFICIENT FOR DIGESTION OF STRUCTURED RNA*

RNase R and RNase II are the two representatives from the RNR family of processive, 3′ to 5′ exoribonucleases in Escherichia coli. Although RNase II is specific for single-stranded RNA, RNase R readily degrades through structured RNA. Furthermore, RNase R appears to be the only known 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease that is able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of a helicase activity. Consequently, its functional domains and mechanism of action are of great interest. Using a series of truncated RNase R proteins we show that the cold-shock and S1 domains contribute to substrate binding. The cold-shock domains appear to play a role in substrate recruitment, whereas the S1 domain is most likely required to position substrates for efficient catalysis. Most importantly, the nuclease domain alone, devoid of the cold-shock and S1 domains, is sufficient for RNase R to bind and degrade structured RNAs. Moreover, this is a unique property of the nuclease domain of RNase R because this domain in RNase II stalls as it approaches a duplex. We also show that the nuclease domain of RNase R binds RNA more tightly than the nuclease domain of RNase II. This tighter binding may help to explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.Ribonucleases (RNases) play important roles in RNA metabolism. They are responsible for the maturation of stable RNA and the degradation of RNA molecules that are defective or no longer required by the cell. Both maturation and degradation are initiated by endoribonucleolytic cleavage(s) and completed by the action of exoribonucleases (1). In Escherichia coli, three, relatively nonspecific, 3′ to 5′ processive exoribonucleases are responsible for degradation of RNA: RNase II, RNase R, and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase).³ RNase II and PNPase appear to be primarily responsible for mRNA decay (2), although their precise functions may differ (3). However, mRNAs containing extensive secondary structure, such as repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences, are degraded by PNPase (4, 5) or RNase R (5). Likewise, degradation of highly structured regions of rRNA (6) and tRNA (7),⁴ is carried out by PNPase and/or RNase R. These findings suggest that PNPase and RNase R are the universal degraders of structured RNAs in vivo, leaving RNase II to act on relatively unstructured RNAs.Whether or not an RNase acts upon a particular RNA appears to depend upon the specificity of the RNase and the accessibility of the RNA to that RNase (1). Purified RNase R readily degrades both single- and double-stranded RNA molecules (5, 8), and it is the only known 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of helicase activity. To degrade RNA molecules containing double-stranded regions, RNase R requires a 3′ single-stranded overhang at least 5 nucleotides long to serve as a binding site from which degradation can be initiated (5, 8, 9).⁵ How RNase R then proceeds through the RNA duplex is of great interest. An important step toward elucidating the mechanism of action of RNase R is to determine the contribution that each of its domains makes to substrate binding and exoribonuclease activity.Despite differences in their physiological roles and intrinsic substrate specificities, RNase R and RNase II both belong to the widely distributed RNR family of exoribonucleases (10–12). RNR family members are all large multidomain proteins with processive 3′ to 5′ hydrolytic exoribonuclease activity that share a common linear domain organization. RNase R contains two cold-shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2) near its N terminus, a central nuclease, or RNB domain, an S1 domain near the C terminus, and a low complexity, highly basic region at the C terminus (Fig. 1A). The nuclease domain contains four highly conserved sequence motifs (10, 11). Motif I contains four conserved aspartate residues that are thought to coordinate two divalent metal ions that facilitate a two-metal ion mechanism similar to that of DEDD family exoribonucleases and the proofreading domains of many polymerases (13, 14). CSDs (15–17) and S1 domains (18, 19) are well known examples of RNA-binding domains. Interestingly, there are reports that both of these domains can act as nucleic acid chaperones and unwind RNA (20–29), providing a possible explanation for the ability of RNase R to degrade structured RNAs. The role of the basic region at the C terminus of RNase R is unknown, but it may act as an RNA-binding domain and/or a mediator of protein-protein interactions.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Linear domain organization of RNase R and RNase II proteins. The CSDs are colored in cyan and blue for CSD1 and CSD2, respectively, the nuclease domains are in green, the S1 domains are red, and the low complexity, highly basic region, found in RNase R only, is in magenta. A, RNase R. RNase R full-length is the full-length wild-type RNase R protein. RNase RΔCSDs lacks both CSD1 and CSD2. RNase RΔBasic is missing the low complexity, highly basic region. RNase RΔS1 is missing both the S1 domain and the low complexity, highly basic region. RNase RΔCSDsΔS1 consists of the nuclease domain alone. B, RNase II. RNase II full-length is the full-length wild-type RNase II protein. RNase IIΔCSDsΔS1 contains the nuclease domain alone.Crystal structures of E. coli wild-type RNase II and a D209N catalytic site mutant in complex with single-stranded RNA have recently been solved (14, 30). In these structures the two CSDs and the S1 domain come together to form an RNA-binding clamp that directs RNA to the catalytic center at the base of a narrow, basic channel within the nuclease domain (14, 30). Only single-stranded RNA can be accommodated by the RNA-binding clamp and the nuclease domain channel, which explains the single strand specificity of RNase II. It is expected that RNase R will adopt a similar structure.In this study, we determine the contribution that each of the domains of RNase R makes to RNA-binding and exoribonuclease activity. We show that the CSDs and the S1 domain are important for substrate binding, although their roles differ. Of most interest, we show that the nuclease domain alone of RNase R is sufficient to degrade through double-stranded RNA, whereas the nuclease domain of RNase II is unable to carry out this reaction. The nuclease domain of RNase R also binds RNA more tightly, which may explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.     

Design and isolation of ribozyme-substrate pairs using RNase P-based ribozymes containing altered substrate binding sites.

Substrate recognition and cleavage by the bacterial RNase P RNA requires two domains, a specificity domain, or S-domain, and a catalytic domain, or C-domain. The S-domain binds the T stem-loop region in a pre-tRNA substrate to confer specificity for tRNA substrates. In this work, the entire S-domain of the Bacillus subtilis RNase P RNA is replaced with an artificial substrate binding module. New RNA substrates are isolated by in vitro selection using two libraries containing random regions of 60 nt. At the end of the selection, the cleavage rates of the substrate library are approximately 0.7 min(-1)in 10 mM MgCl(2)at 37 degrees C, approximately 4-fold better than the cleavage of a pre-tRNA substrate by the wild-type RNase P RNA under the same conditions. The contribution of the S-domain replacement to the catalytic efficiency is from 6- to 22 000-fold. Chemical and nuclease mapping of two ribozyme-product complexes shows that this contribution correlates with direct interactions between the S-domain replacement and the selected substrate. These results demonstrate the feasibility of design and isolation of RNase P-based, matching ribozyme-substrate pairs without prior knowledge of the sequence or structure of the interactive modules in the ribozyme or substrate.     

The Helicase Activity of Ribonuclease R Is Essential for Efficient Nuclease Activity

RNase R, which belongs to the RNB family of enzymes, is a 3′ to 5′ hydrolytic exoribonuclease able to digest highly structured RNA. It was previously reported that RNase R possesses an intrinsic helicase activity that is independent of its ribonuclease activity. However, the properties of this helicase activity and its relationship to the ribonuclease activity were not clear. Here, we show that helicase activity is dependent on ATP and have identified ATP-binding Walker A and Walker B motifs that are present in Escherichia coli RNase R and in 88% of mesophilic bacterial genera analyzed, but absent from thermophilic bacteria. We also show by mutational analysis that both of these motifs are required for helicase activity. Interestingly, the Walker A motif is located in the C-terminal region of RNase R, whereas the Walker B motif is in its N-terminal region implying that the two parts of the protein must come together to generate a functional ATP-binding site. Direct measurement of ATP binding confirmed that ATP binds only when double-stranded RNA is present. Detailed analysis of the helicase activity revealed that ATP hydrolysis is not required because both adenosine 5′-O-(thiotriphosphate) and adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate can stimulate helicase activity, as can other nucleoside triphosphates. Although the nuclease activity of RNase R is not needed for its helicase activity, the helicase activity is important for effective nuclease activity against a dsRNA substrate, particularly at lower temperatures and with more stable duplexes. Moreover, competition experiments and mutational analysis revealed that the helicase activity utilizes the same catalytic channel as the nuclease activity. These findings indicate that the helicase activity plays an essential role in the catalytic efficiency of RNase R.     

The structure and enzymatic properties of a novel RNase II family enzyme from Deinococcus radiodurans

Exoribonucleases are vital in nearly all aspects of RNA metabolism, including RNA maturation, end-turnover, and degradation. RNase II and RNase R are paralogous members of the RNR superfamily of nonspecific, 3'→5', processive exoribonucleases. In Escherichia coli, RNase II plays a primary role in mRNA decay and has a preference for unstructured RNA. RNase R, in contrast, is capable of digesting structured RNA and plays a role in the degradation of both mRNA and stable RNA. Deinococcus radiodurans, a radiation-resistant bacterium, contains two RNR family members. The shorter of these, DrR63, includes a sequence signature typical of RNase R, but we show here that this enzyme is an RNase II-type exonuclease and cannot degrade structured RNA. We also report the crystal structure of this protein, now termed DrII. The DrII structure reveals a truncated RNA binding region in which the N-terminal cold shock domains, typical of most RNR family nucleases, are replaced by an unusual winged helix-turn-helix domain, where the "wing" is contributed by the C-terminal S1 domain. Consistent with its truncated RNA binding region, DrII is able to remove 3' overhangs from RNA molecules closer to duplexes than do other RNase II-type enzymes. DrII also displays distinct sensitivity to pyrimidine-rich regions of single-stranded RNA and is able to process tRNA precursors with adenosine-rich 3' extensions in vitro. These data indicate that DrII is the RNase II of D. radiodurans and that its structure and catalytic properties are distinct from those of other related enzymes.     

Substrate recognition and catalysis by the exoribonuclease RNase R

RNase R is a processive, 3' to 5' hydrolytic exoribonuclease that together with polynucleotide phosphorylase plays an important role in the degradation of structured RNAs. However, RNase R differs from other exoribonucleases in that it can by itself degrade RNAs with extensive secondary structure provided that a single-stranded 3' overhang is present. Using a variety of specifically designed substrates, we show here that a 3' overhang of at least 7 nucleotides is required for tight binding and activity, whereas optimum binding and activity are achieved when the overhang is 10 or more nucleotides in length. In contrast, duplex RNAs with no overhang or with a 4-nucleotide overhang bind extremely poorly to RNase R and are inactive as substrates. A duplex RNA with a 10-nucleotide 5' overhang also is not a substrate. Interestingly, this molecule is bound only weakly, indicating that RNase R does not simply recognize single-stranded RNA, but the RNA must thread into the enzyme with 3' to 5' polarity. We also show that ribose moieties are required for recognition of the substrate as a whole since RNase R is unable to bind or degrade single-stranded DNA. However, RNA molecules with deoxyribose or dideoxyribose residues at their 3' termini can be bound and degraded. Based on these data and a homology model of RNase R, derived from the structure of the closely related enzyme, RNase II, we present a model for how RNase R interacts with its substrates and degrades RNA.     

Characterization of the functional domains of Escherichia coli RNase II

RNase II is a single-stranded-specific 3'-exoribonuclease that degrades RNA generating 5'-mononucleotides. This enzyme is the prototype of an ubiquitous family of enzymes that are crucial in RNA metabolism and share a similar domain organization. By sequence prediction, three different domains have been assigned to the Escherichia coli RNase II: two RNA-binding domains at each end of the protein (CSD and S1), and a central RNB catalytic domain. In this work we have performed a functional characterization of these domains in order to address their role in the activity of RNase II. We have constructed a large set of RNase II truncated proteins and compared them to the wild-type regarding their exoribonucleolytic activity and RNA-binding ability. The dissociation constants were determined using different single- or double-stranded substrates. The results obtained revealed that S1 is the most important domain in the establishment of stable RNA-protein complexes, and its elimination results in a drastic reduction on RNA-binding ability. In addition, we also demonstrate that the N-terminal CSD plays a very specific role in RNase II, preventing a tight binding of the enzyme to single-stranded poly(A) chains. Moreover, the biochemical results obtained with RNB mutant that lacks both putative RNA-binding domains, revealed the presence of an additional region involved in RNA binding. Such region, was identified by sequence analysis and secondary structure prediction as a third putative RNA-binding domain located at the N-terminal part of RNB catalytic domain.     

Ethidium-dependent uncoupling of substrate binding and cleavage by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III

Ethidium bromide (EB) is known to inhibit cleavage of bacterial rRNA precursors by Escherichia coli ribonuclease III, a dsRNA-specific nuclease. The mechanism of EB inhibition of RNase III is not known nor is there information on EB-binding sites in RNase III substrates. We show here that EB is a reversible, apparently competitive inhibitor of RNase III cleavage of small model substrates in vitro. Inhibition is due to intercalation, since (i) the inhibitory concentrations of EB are similar to measured EB intercalation affinities; (ii) substrate cleavage is not affected by actinomycin D, an intercalating agent that does not bind dsRNA; (iii) the EB concentration dependence of inhibition is a function of substrate structure. In contrast, EB does not strongly inhibit the ability of RNase III to bind substrate. EB also does not block substrate binding by the C-terminal dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD) of RNase III, indicating that EB perturbs substrate recognition by the N-terminal catalytic domain. Laser photocleavage experiments revealed two ethidium-binding sites in the substrate R1.1 RNA. One site is in the internal loop, adjacent to the scissile bond, while the second site is in the lower stem. Both sites consist of an A-A pair stacked on a CG pair, a motif which apparently provides a particularly favorable environment for intercalation. These results indicate an inhibitory mechanism in which EB site-specifically binds substrate, creating a cleavage-resistant complex that can compete with free substrate for RNase III. This study also shows that RNase III recognition and cleavage of substrate can be uncoupled and supports an enzymatic mechanism of dsRNA cleavage involving cooperative but not obligatorily linked actions of the dsRBD and the catalytic domain.     

Structural biochemistry of a type 2 RNase H: RNA primer recognition and removal during DNA replication

DNA replication and cellular survival requires efficient removal of RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis. In eukaryotes, RNA primer removal is initiated by type 2 RNase H, which specifically cleaves the RNA portion of an RNA-DNA/DNA hybrid duplex. This conserved type 2 RNase H family of replicative enzymes shares little sequence similarity with the well-characterized prokaryotic type 1 RNase H enzymes, yet both possess similar enzymatic properties. Crystal structures and structure-based mutational analysis of RNase HII from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, both with and without a bound metal ion, identify the active site for type 2 RNase H enzymes that provides the general nuclease activity necessary for catalysis. The two-domain architecture of type 2 RNase H creates a positively charged binding groove and links the unique C-terminal helix-loop-helix cap domain to the active site catalytic domain. This architectural arrangement apparently couples directional A-form duplex binding, by a hydrogen-bonding Arg-Lys phosphate ruler motif, to substrate-discrimination, by a tyrosine finger motif, thereby providing substrate-specific catalytic activity. Combined kinetic and mutational analyses of structurally implicated substrate binding residues validate this binding mode. These structural and mutational results together suggest a molecular mechanism for type 2 RNase H enzymes for the specific recognition and cleavage of RNA in the RNA-DNA junction within hybrid duplexes, which reconciles the broad substrate binding affinity with the catalytic specificity observed in biochemical assays. In combination with a recent independent structural analysis, these results furthermore identify testable molecular hypotheses for the activity and function of the type 2 RNase H family of enzymes, including structural complementarity, substrate-mediated conformational changes and coordination with subsequent FEN-1 activity.     

Evidence for induced fit in bacterial RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage

RNase P with its catalytic RNA subunit is involved in the processing of a number of RNA precursors with different structures. However, precursor tRNAs are the most abundant substrates for RNase P. Available data suggest that a tRNA is folded into its characteristic structure already at the precursor state and that RNase P recognizes this structure. The tRNA D-/T-loop domain (TSL-region) is suggested to interact with the specificity domain of RNase P RNA while residues in the catalytic domain interact with the cleavage site. Here, we have studied the consequences of a productive interaction between the TSL-region and its binding site (TBS) in the specificity domain using tRNA precursors and various hairpin-loop model substrates. The different substrates were analyzed with respect to cleavage site recognition, ground-state binding, cleavage as a function of the concentration of Mg(2+) and the rate of cleavage under conditions where chemistry is suggested to be rate limiting using wild-type Escherichia coli RNase P RNA, M1 RNA, and M1 RNA variants with structural changes in the TBS-region. On the basis of our data, we conclude that a productive TSL/TBS interaction results in a conformational change in the M1 RNA substrate complex that has an effect on catalysis. Moreover, it is likely that this conformational change comprises positioning of chemical groups (and Mg(2+)) at and in the vicinity of the cleavage site. Hence, our findings are consistent with an induced-fit mechanism in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage.     

Modular construction for function of a ribonucleoprotein enzyme: the catalytic domain of Bacillus subtilis RNase P complexed with B. subtilis RNase P protein

The bacterial RNase P holoenzyme catalyzes the formation of the mature 5′-end of tRNAs and is composed of an RNA and a protein subunit. Among the two folding domains of the RNase P RNA, the catalytic domain (C-domain) contains the active site of this ribozyme. We investigated specific binding of the Bacillus subtilis C-domain with the B.subtilis RNase P protein and examined the catalytic activity of this C-domain–P protein complex. The C-domain forms a specific complex with the P protein with a binding constant of ~0.1 µM. The C-domain–P protein complex and the holoenzyme are equally efficient in cleaving single-stranded RNA (~0.9 min^–1 at pH 7.8) and substrates with a hairpin–loop 3′ to the cleavage site (~40 min^–1). The holoenzyme reaction is much more efficient with a pre-tRNA substrate, binding at least 100-fold better and cleaving 10–500 times more efficiently. These results demonstrate that the RNase P holoenzyme is functionally constructed in three parts. The catalytic domain alone contains the active site, but has little specificity and affinity for most substrates. The specificity and affinity for the substrate is generated by either the specificity domain of RNase P RNA binding to a T stem–loop-like hairpin or RNase P protein binding to a single-stranded RNA. This modular construction may be exploited to obtain RNase P-based ribonucleoprotein complexes with altered substrate specificity.     

Different cleavage specificities of RNases III from Rhodobacter capsulatus and Escherichia coli.

23S rRNA in Rhodobacter capsulatus shows endoribonuclease III (RNase III)-dependent fragmentation in vivo at a unique extra stem-loop extending from position 1271 to 1331. RNase III is a double strand (ds)-specific endoribonuclease. This substrate preference is mediated by a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) within the protein. Although a certain degree of double strandedness is a prerequisite, the question arises what structural features exactly make this extra stem-loop an RNase III cleavage site, distinguishing it from the plethora of stem-loops in 23S rRNA? We used RNase III purified from R.capsulatus and Escherichia coli, respectively, together with well known substrates for E.coli RNase III and RNA substrates derived from the special cleavage site in R.capsulatus 23S rRNA to study the interaction between the Rhodobacter enzyme and the fragmentation site. Although both enzymes are very similar in their amino acid sequence, they exhibit significant differences in binding and cleavage of these in vitro substrates.     

The pH-dependence of the Escherichia coli RNase HII-catalysed reaction suggests that an active site carboxylate group participates directly in catalysis

RNase HII specifically catalyses the hydrolysis of phosphate diester linkages contained within the RNA portion of DNA/RNA hybrids. The catalytic parameters of the enzyme derived from Escherichia coli BL21 have been measured using 5'-fluorescent oligodeoxynucleotide substrates containing embedded ribonucleotides. The products of the reaction and the chemistry of phosphate diester hydrolysis were assigned unequivocally using mass spectrometry. The pH-dependence of the catalytic parameters was measured under conditions of optimal magnesium ion concentration. The logarithm of the turnover number of the enzyme increases steeply with pH until a pH-independent region is reached close to neutrality. The slope of the pH-dependent region is 2, indicating that the catalytically proficient form of RNase HII is di-anionic. The pH-dependence of log 1/K(M) is a sigmoidal curve reaching a maximal value at higher pH, suggesting deprotonation of a residue stabilises substrate binding. Possible mechanisms for the RNase HII-catalysed reaction consistent with the pH-dependent behaviour of the enzyme are discussed. The active sites of RNase H enzymes contain a cluster of four strictly conserved carboxylate groups. Together, the data suggest a requirement for ionisation of an active site carboxylic acid for metal ion binding or correct positioning of metal ion(s) in the enzyme-substrate complex and a role for a second active site carboxylate in general base catalysis.     

Yeast ribonuclease III uses a network of multiple hydrogen bonds for RNA binding and cleavage

Members of the bacterial RNase III family recognize a variety of short structured RNAs with few common features. It is not clear how this group of enzymes supports high cleavage fidelity while maintaining a broad base of substrates. Here we show that the yeast orthologue of RNase III (Rnt1p) uses a network of 2'-OH-dependent interactions to recognize substrates with different structures. We designed a series of bipartite substrates permitting the distinction between binding and cleavage defects. Each substrate was engineered to carry a single or multiple 2'- O-methyl or 2'-fluoro ribonucleotide substitutions to prevent the formation of hydrogen bonds with a specific nucleotide or group of nucleotides. Interestingly, introduction of 2'- O-methyl ribonucleotides near the cleavage site increased the rate of catalysis, indicating that 2'-OH are not required for cleavage. Substitution of nucleotides in known Rnt1p binding site with 2'- O-methyl ribonucleotides inhibited cleavage while single 2'-fluoro ribonucleotide substitutions did not. This indicates that while no single 2'-OH is essential for Rnt1p cleavage, small changes in the substrate structure are not tolerated. Strikingly, several nucleotide substitutions greatly increased the substrate dissociation constant with little or no effect on the Michaelis-Menten constant or rate of catalysis. Together, the results indicate that Rnt1p uses a network of nucleotide interactions to identify its substrate and support two distinct modes of binding. One mode is primarily mediated by the dsRNA binding domain and leads to the formation of stable RNA/protein complex, while the other requires the presence of the nuclease and N-terminal domains and leads to RNA cleavage.     

Molecular requirements for degradation of a modified sense RNA strand by Escherichia coli ribonuclease H1

The structural requirements for DNA/RNA hybrids to be suitable substrates for RNase H1 are well described; however the tolerance level of this enzyme towards modifications that do not alter the duplex conformation is not clearly understood, especially with respect to the sense RNA strand. In order to investigate the molecular requirements of Escherichia coli RNase H1 (termed RNase H1 here) with respect to the sense RNA strand, we synthesized a series of oligonucleotides containing 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-beta-D-ribose (2'F-RNA) as a substitute for the natural beta-D-ribose sugars found in RNA. Our results from a series of RNase H1 binding and cleavage studies indicated that 2'F-RNA/DNA hybrids are not substrates of RNase H1 and ultimately led to the conclusion that the 2'-hydroxyl moiety of the RNA strand in a DNA/RNA hybrid is required for both binding and hydrolysis by RNase H1. Through the synthesis of a series of chimeric sense oligonucleotides of mixed RNA and 2'F-RNA composition, the gap requirements of RNase H1 within the sense strand were examined. Results from these studies showed that RNase H1 requires at least five or six natural RNA residues within the sense RNA strand of a hybrid substrate for both binding and hydrolysis. The RNase H1-mediated degradation patterns of these hybrids agree with previous suggestions on the processivity of RNase H1, mainly that the binding site is located 5' to the catalytic site with respect to the sense strand. They also suggest, however, that the binding and catalytic domains of RNase H1 might be closer than has been previously suggested. In addition to the above, physicochemical studies have revealed the thermal stabilities and relative conformations of these modified heteroduplexes under physiological conditions. These findings offer further insights into the physical binding and catalytic properties of the RNase H1-substrate interaction, and have been incorporated into a general model summarizing the mechanism of action of this unique enzyme.     

Trypanosoma brucei RRP44: a versatile enzyme for processing structured and non-structured RNA substrates

Rrp44/Dis3 is a conserved eukaryotic ribonuclease that acts on processing and degradation of nearly all types of RNA. It contains an endo- (PIN) and an exonucleolytic (RNB) domain and, its depletion in model organisms supports its essential function for cell viability. In Trypanosoma brucei, depletion of Rrp44 (TbRRP44) blocks maturation of ribosomal RNA, leading to disruption of ribosome synthesis and inhibition of cell proliferation. We have determined the crystal structure of the exoribonucleolytic module of TbRRP44 in an active conformation, revealing novel details of the catalytic mechanism of the RNB domain. For the first time, the position of the second magnesium involved in the two-metal-ion mechanism was determined for a member of the RNase II family. In vitro, TbRRP44 acts preferentially on non-structured uridine-rich RNA substrates. However, we demonstrated for the first time that both TbRRP44 and its homologue from Saccharomyces cerevisiae can also degrade structured substrates without 3’-end overhang, suggesting that Rrp44/Dis3 ribonucleases may be involved in degradation of a wider panel of RNA than has been assumed. Interestingly, deletion of TbRRP44 PIN domain impairs RNA binding to different extents, depending on the type of substrate.     

Interactions of a Pop5/Rpp1 heterodimer with the catalytic domain of RNase MRP

Ribonuclease (RNase) MRP is a multicomponent ribonucleoprotein complex closely related to RNase P. RNase MRP and eukaryotic RNase P share most of their protein components, as well as multiple features of their catalytic RNA moieties, but have distinct substrate specificities. While RNase P is practically universally found in all three domains of life, RNase MRP is essential in eukaryotes. The structural organizations of eukaryotic RNase P and RNase MRP are poorly understood. Here, we show that Pop5 and Rpp1, protein components found in both RNase P and RNase MRP, form a heterodimer that binds directly to the conserved area of the putative catalytic domain of RNase MRP RNA. The Pop5/Rpp1 binding site corresponds to the protein binding site in bacterial RNase P RNA. Structural and evolutionary roles of the Pop5/Rpp1 heterodimer in RNases P and MRP are discussed.     

Crystal structure of Caulobacter crescentus polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals a mechanism of RNA substrate channelling and RNA degradosome assembly

Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is an exoribonuclease that cleaves single-stranded RNA substrates with 3'-5' directionality and processive behaviour. Its ring-like, trimeric architecture creates a central channel where phosphorolytic active sites reside. One face of the ring is decorated with RNA-binding K-homology (KH) and S1 domains, but exactly how these domains help to direct the 3' end of single-stranded RNA substrates towards the active sites is an unsolved puzzle. Insight into this process is provided by our crystal structures of RNA-bound and apo Caulobacter crescentus PNPase. In the RNA-free form, the S1 domains adopt a 'splayed' conformation that may facilitate capture of RNA substrates. In the RNA-bound structure, the three KH domains collectively close upon the RNA and direct the 3' end towards a constricted aperture at the entrance of the central channel. The KH domains make non-equivalent interactions with the RNA, and there is a marked asymmetry within the catalytic core of the enzyme. On the basis of these data, we propose that structural non-equivalence, induced upon RNA binding, helps to channel substrate to the active sites through mechanical ratcheting. Structural and biochemical analyses also reveal the basis for PNPase association with RNase E in the multi-enzyme RNA degradosome assembly of the α-proteobacteria.     

Modulating the RNA Processing and Decay by the Exosome: Altering Rrp44/Dis3 Activity and End-Product

In eukaryotes, the exosome plays a central role in RNA maturation, turnover, and quality control. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the core exosome is composed of nine catalytically inactive subunits constituting a ring structure and the active nuclease Rrp44, also known as Dis3. Rrp44 is a member of the ribonuclease II superfamily of exoribonucleases which include RNase R, Dis3L1 and Dis3L2. In this work we have functionally characterized three residues located in the highly conserved RNB catalytic domain of Rrp44: Y595, Q892 and G895. To address their precise role in Rrp44 activity, we have constructed Rrp44 mutants and compared their activity to the wild-type Rrp44. When we mutated residue Q892 and tested its activity in vitro, the enzyme became slightly more active. We also showed that when we mutated Y595, the final degradation product of Rrp44 changed from 4 to 5 nucleotides. This result confirms that this residue is responsible for the stacking of the RNA substrate in the catalytic cavity, as was predicted from the structure of Rrp44. Furthermore, we also show that a strain with a mutation in this residue has a growth defect and affects RNA processing and degradation. These results lead us to hypothesize that this residue has an important biological role. Molecular dynamics modeling of these Rrp44 mutants and the wild-type enzyme showed changes that extended beyond the mutated residues and helped to explain these results.