N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation domains differentially regulate arrestin and agonist affinity

Arrestins regulate the signaling and endocytosis of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It has been suggested that the functions of arrestins are dependent upon both the number and pattern of phosphorylation sites present in an activated GPCR. However, little is currently known about the relationships between the sites of receptor phosphorylation, the resulting affinities of arrestin binding, and the ensuing mechanisms of receptor regulation for any given GPCR. To investigate these interactions, we used an active truncated mutant of arrestin (amino acids 1-382) and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR). In contrast to results with wild type arrestins, the truncated arrestin-2 protein bound to the unphosphorylated wild type FPR, although with lower affinity and a low affinity for the agonist as revealed by competition studies with heterotrimeric G proteins. Using FPR mutants, we further demonstrated that the phosphorylation status of serines and threonines between residues 328-332 is a key determinant that regulates the affinity of the FPR for arrestins. Furthermore, we found that the phosphorylation status of serine and threonine residues between amino acids 334 and 339 regulates the affinity of the receptor for agonist when arrestin is bound. These results suggest that the agonist affinity state of the receptor is principally regulated by phosphorylation at specific sites and is not simply a consequence of arrestin binding as has previously been proposed. Furthermore, this is the first demonstration that agonist affinity of a GPCR and the affinity of arrestin binding to the phosphorylated receptor are regulated by distinct receptor phosphodomains.     

Partial phosphorylation of the N-formyl peptide receptor inhibits G protein association independent of arrestin binding

It is now well accepted that G protein-coupled receptors activated by agonist binding become targets for phosphorylation, leading to desensitization of the receptor. Using a series of phosphorylation deficient mutants of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), we have explored the role of phosphorylation on the ability of the receptor to interact with G proteins and arrestins. Using a fluorometric assay in conjunction with solubilized receptors, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of the wild type FPR lowers its affinity for G protein, whereas mutant receptors lacking four potential phosphorylation sites retain their ability to couple to G protein. Phosphorylated mutant receptors lacking only two potential phosphorylation sites are again unable to couple to G protein. Furthermore, whereas stimulated wild type FPR in whole cells colocalizes with arrestin-2, and the solubilized, phosphorylated FPR binds arrestin-2, the stimulated receptors lacking four potential phosphorylation sites display no interaction with arrestin-2. However, the mutant receptors lacking only two potential phosphorylation sites are restored in their ability to bind and colocalize with arrestin-2. Thus, there is a submaximal threshold of FPR phosphorylation that simultaneously results in an inhibition of G protein binding and an induction of arrestin binding. These results are the first to demonstrate that less than maximal levels of receptor phosphorylation can block G protein binding, independent of arrestin binding. We therefore propose that phosphorylation alone may be sufficient to desensitize the FPR in vivo, raising the possibility that for certain G protein-coupled receptors, desensitization may not be the primary function of arrestin.     

Targeted construction of phosphorylation-independent beta-arrestin mutants with constitutive activity in cells

Arrestin proteins play a key role in the desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Recently we proposed a molecular mechanism whereby arrestin preferentially binds to the activated and phosphorylated form of its cognate GPCR. To test the model, we introduced two different types of mutations into beta-arrestin that were expected to disrupt two crucial elements that make beta-arrestin binding to receptors phosphorylation-dependent. We found that two beta-arrestin mutants (Arg169 --> Glu and Asp383 --> Ter) (Ter, stop codon) are indeed "constitutively active." In vitro these mutants bind to the agonist-activated beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) regardless of its phosphorylation status. When expressed in Xenopus oocytes these beta-arrestin mutants effectively desensitize beta2AR in a phosphorylation-independent manner. Constitutively active beta-arrestin mutants also effectively desensitize delta opioid receptor (DOR) and restore the agonist-induced desensitization of a truncated DOR lacking the critical G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) phosphorylation sites. The kinetics of the desensitization induced by phosphorylation-independent mutants in the absence of receptor phosphorylation appears identical to that induced by wild type beta-arrestin + GRK3. Either of the mutations could have occurred naturally and made receptor kinases redundant, raising the question of why a more complex two-step mechanism (receptor phosphorylation followed by arrestin binding) is universally used.     

Protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor regulates its coupling to Gs and Gi. Demonstration in a reconstituted system

While classically viewed as a prototypic G(s) and adenylyl cyclase-coupled G protein-coupled receptor, recent studies have indicated that some aspects of beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)-AR) signaling are inhibited by pertussis toxin, indicating that they are mediated by G(i)/G(o) proteins. These signals include activation of ERK MAPKs and Akt activation, as well as hypertrophic and anti-apoptotic pathways in cardiac myocytes. Studies in cultured cells have suggested the hypothesis that protein kinase A (PKA)-mediated phosphorylation of the beta(2)-AR regulates its coupling specificity with respect to G(s) and G(i). Using a Chinese hamster ovary cell system, we show that mutant beta(2)-ARs with Ala substituted for Ser at consensus PKA sites stimulate robust cyclic AMP accumulation (G(s)) but are unable to activate ERK (G(i)). In contrast, Ser --> Asp mutants are dramatically impaired in their ability to activate adenylyl cyclase but are significantly more active than wild type receptor in activating ERK. Activation of adenylyl cyclase by wild type and Ser --> Ala mutant receptors is not altered by pertussis toxin, whereas adenylyl cyclase stimulated through the Ser --> Asp mutant is enhanced. Activation of ERK by wild type and Ser --> Asp receptors is inhibited by pertussis toxin. To further rigorously test the hypothesis, we utilized a completely reconstituted system of purified recombinant wild type and PKA phosphorylation site mutant beta(2)-ARs and heterotrimeric G(s) and G(i). G protein coupling was measured by receptor-mediated stimulation of GTPgammaS binding to the G protein. PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the beta(2)-AR significantly decreased its ability to couple to G(s), while simultaneously dramatically increasing its ability to couple to G(i). These results are reproduced when a purified recombinant Ser --> Asp mutant beta(2)-AR is tested, whereas the Ser --> Ala receptor resembles the unphosphorylated wild type. These results provide strong experimental support for the idea that PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor switches its predominant coupling from G(s) to G(i).     

Conservation of the phosphate-sensitive elements in the arrestin family of proteins.

Arrestins play a key role in the homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These cytosolic proteins selectively bind to the agonist-activated and GPCR kinase-phosphorylated forms of the GPCR, precluding its further interaction with the G protein. Certain mutations in visual arrestin yield "constitutively active" proteins that bind with high affinity to the light-activated form of rhodopsin without requiring phosphorylation. The crystal structure of visual arrestin shows that these activating mutations perturb two groups of intramolecular interactions that keep arrestin in its basal (inactive) state. Here we introduced homologous mutations into arrestin2 and arrestin3 and found that the resulting mutants bind to the beta(2)-adrenoreceptor in vitro in a phosphorylation-independent fashion. The same mutants effectively desensitize both the beta(2)-adrenergic and delta-opioid receptors in the absence of receptor phosphorylation in Xenopus oocytes. Moreover, the arrestin mutants also desensitize the truncated delta-opioid receptor from which the C terminus, containing critical phosphorylation sites, has been removed. Conservation of the phosphate-sensitive hot spots in non-visual arrestins suggests that the overall fold is similar to that of visual arrestin and that the mechanisms whereby receptor-attached phosphates drive arrestin transition into the active binding competent state are conserved throughout the arrestin family of proteins.     

Phosphorylation of beta-arrestin2 regulates its function in internalization of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors

Beta-arrestins mediate agonist-dependent desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors. Previously, we have shown that phosphorylation of beta-arrestin1 by ERKs at Ser-412 regulates its association with clathrin and its function in promoting clathrin-mediated internalization of the receptor. In this paper we report that beta-arrestin2 is also phosphorylated, predominantly at residues Thr-383 and Ser-361. Isoproterenol stimulation of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor promotes dephosphorylation of beta-arrestin2. Mutation of beta-arrestin2 phosphorylation sites to aspartic acid decreases the association of beta-arrestin2 with clathrin, thereby reducing its ability to promote internalization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Its ability to bind and desensitize the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor is, however, unaltered. These results suggest that, analogous to beta-arrestin1, phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-arrestin2 regulates clathrin-mediated internalization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. In contrast to beta-arrestin1, which is phosphorylated by ERK1 and ERK2, phosphorylation of beta-arrestin2 at Thr-383 is shown to be mediated by casein kinase II. Recently, it has been reported that phosphorylation of visual arrestin at Ser-366 prevents its binding to clathrin. Thus it appears that the function of all arrestin family members in mediating internalization of G protein-coupled receptors is regulated by distinct phosphorylation/dephosphorylation mechanisms.     

Phosphorylation uncouples the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor from G(q)

Previous work on the desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors has focused on the role of arrestin binding following receptor phosphorylation. We have examined the hypothesis that phosphorylation alone contributes to desensitization. In this study we demonstrate that for the G(q)-coupled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R), phosphorylation by GRK2 to a stoichiometry of approximately 1 mol PO(4)/mol GRP-R is sufficient in the absence of arrestin to reduce the rate of receptor catalyzed G protein activation by approximately 80%. Furthermore, GRP-Rs exposed in vivo to agonist are rapidly phosphorylated to a similar stoichiometry and are desensitized to a similar degree. Finally, the molecular mechanism for both in vitro GRK2-induced and in vivo agonist-induced desensitization is primarily a decrease in the maximum velocity (V(max)) for the catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange by the GRP-R rather than a change in the affinity of the receptor for the alpha(q) or betagamma subunits. Based on these results, we suggest that, for some G protein-coupled receptors, phosphorylation has a role in desensitization that is independent of arrestin.     

Distinct roles for Src tyrosine kinase in beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to MAPK and in receptor internalization

G protein-coupled receptors form the largest family of membrane receptors and transmit diverse ligand signals to modulate various cellular responses. After activation by their ligands, some of these G protein-coupled receptors are desensitized, internalized (endocytosed), and down-regulated (degraded). In HEK 293 cells, the G(s)-coupled beta2-adrenergic receptor was postulated to initiate a second wave of signaling, such as the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway after the receptor is internalized. The tyrosine kinase c-Src plays a critical role in these events. Here we used mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells deficient in Src family tyrosine kinases to examine the role of Src in beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to the MAPK pathway and in receptor internalization. We found that in Src-deficient cells the beta2-adrenergic receptor could activate the MAPK pathway. However, the internalization of beta2-adrenergic receptors was blocked in Src-deficient MEF cells. Furthermore, we observed that in MEF cells deficient in beta-arrestin 2 the internalization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor was impaired, whereas the activation of the MAPK pathway by the beta2-adrenergic receptor was normal. Our data demonstrate that although Src and beta-arrestin 2 play essential roles in beta2-adrenergic receptor internalization, they are not required for the activation of the MAPK pathway by the beta2-adrenergic receptor. In other words, our finding suggests that receptor internalization is not required for beta2-adrenergic receptor signaling to the MAPK pathway in MEF cells.     

Inhibition of chemoattractant N-formyl peptide receptor trafficking by active arrestins

Recent studies have highlighted the emergence of a class of G protein-coupled receptors that are internalized in an arrestin-independent manner. In addition to demonstrating that the N-formyl peptide receptor belongs in this family, we have recently shown that recycling of the receptor requires the presence of arrestins. To further elucidate mechanisms of arrestin-dependent regulation of G protein-coupled receptor processing, we examined the effects of altering the receptor-arrestin complex on ternary complex formation and cellular trafficking of the N-formyl peptide receptor by studying two active arrestin-2 mutants (truncated arrestin-2 [1-382], and arrestin-2 I386A, V387A, F388A). Complexes between the N-formyl peptide receptor and active arrestins exhibited higher affinity in vitro than the complex between the N-formyl peptide receptor and wild-type arrestin and furthermore were observed in vivo by colocalization studies using confocal microscopy. To assess the effects of these altered interactions on receptor trafficking, we demonstrated that active, but not wild-type, arrestin expression retards N-formyl peptide receptor internalization. Furthermore, expression of arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A but not arrestin-2 [1-382] inhibited recycling of the N-formyl peptide receptor, reflecting an expanded role for arrestins in G protein-coupled receptor processing and trafficking. Whereas the extent of N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation had no effect on the inhibition of internalization, N-formyl peptide receptor recycling was restored when the receptor was only partially phosphorylated. These results indicate not only that a functional interaction between receptor and arrestin is required for recycling of certain G protein-coupled receptors, such as the N-formyl peptide receptor, but that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation further regulates this process.     

Binding of the beta2 adrenergic receptor to N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor regulates receptor recycling

Following agonist stimulation, most G protein-coupled receptors become desensitized and are internalized, either to be degraded or recycled back to the cell surface. What determines the fate of a specific receptor type after it is internalized is poorly understood. Here we show that the rapidly recycling beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) binds via a determinant including the last three amino acids in its carboxyl-terminal tail to the membrane fusion regulatory protein, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF). This is documented by in vitro overlay assays and by cellular coimmunoprecipitations. Receptors bearing mutations in any of the last three residues fail to interact with NSF. After stimulation with the agonist isoproterenol, a green fluorescent protein fusion of NSF colocalizes with the wild type beta2AR but not with a tail-mutated beta2AR. The beta2AR-NSF interaction is required for efficient internalization of the receptors and for their recycling to the cell surface. Mutations in the beta2AR tail that ablate NSF binding reduce the efficiency of receptor internalization upon agonist stimulation. Upon subsequent treatment of cells with the antagonist propranolol, wild type receptors return to the cell surface, while tail-mutated receptors remain sequestered. Thus, the direct binding of the beta2AR to NSF demonstrates how, after internalization, the fate of a receptor is reliant on a specific interaction with a component of the cellular membrane-trafficking machinery.     

Role of the rate of internalization of the agonist-receptor complex on the agonist-induced down-regulation of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor.

The extent of agonist-induced down-regulation of the LH/CG receptor (LHR) in human kidney 293 cells transfected with the rat LHR (rLHR) is much lower than in two Leydig tumor cell lines (MA-10 and R2C) that express the rodent LHR endogenously. This difference can not be attributed to differences in the recycling of internalized receptors, or in the replenishment of new receptors at the cell surface. It can be correlated, however, with the half-life of internalization of the bound agonist, which is approximately 60 min in Leydig tumor cells and about 100 min in transfected 293 cells. To determine whether the rate of internalization of the bound agonist affects down-regulation, we compared these two parameters in 293 cells expressing four rLHR mutants that enhance internalization and three mutants that impair internalization. We show that all four mutations of the rLHR that enhanced internalization enhanced down-regulation, while only one of the three mutations that impaired internalization impaired down-regulation. In addition, cotransfections of 293 cells with the rLHR-wt and three constructs that enhanced internalization (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, beta-arrestin, and arrestin-3) increased down-regulation, while a related construct (visual arrestin) that had no effect on internalization also had no effect on down-regulation. We conclude that the rate of internalization of the agonist-LHR complex is the main determinant of the extent of down-regulation of the LHR.     

Identification of distinct c-terminal domains of the Bombyx adipokinetic hormone receptor that are essential for receptor export, phosphorylation and internalization

Neuropeptides of the adipokinetic hormone (AKH) family play important roles in insect hemolymph sugar homeostasis, larval lipolysis and storage-fat mobilization. Our previous studies have shown that the adipokinetic hormone receptor (AKHR), a Gs-coupled receptor, induces intracellular cAMP accumulation, calcium mobilization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation upon agonist stimulation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate the internalization and desensitization of AKHR remain largely unknown. In the current study we made a construct to express AKHR fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at its C-terminal end to further characterize AKHR internalization. In stable AKHR-EGFP-expressing HEK-293 cells, AKHR-EGFP was mainly localized at the plasma membrane and was rapidly internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner via the clathrin-coated pit pathway upon agonist stimulation, and internalized receptors were slowly recovered to the cell surface after the removal of AKH peptides. The results derived from RNA interference and arrestin translocation demonstrated that G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and 5 (GRK2/5) and β-arrestin2 were involved in receptor phosphorylation and internalization. Furthermore, experiments using deletion and site-directed mutagenesis strategies identified the three residues (Thr356, Ser359 and Thr362) responsible for GRK-mediated phosphorylation and internalization and the C-terminal domain from residue-322 to residue-342 responsible for receptor export from ER. This is the first detailed investigation of the internalization and trafficking of insect G protein-coupled receptors.     

Resistance of the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor to agonist-mediated down-regulation. Role of the C terminus in determining beta-subtype degradation

Prolonged agonist stimulation results in down-regulation of most G protein-coupled receptors. When we exposed baby hamster kidney cells stably expressing the human beta1-adrenergic receptor (beta 1AR) to agonist over a 24-h period, we instead observed an increase of approximately 30% in both beta 1AR binding activity and immune-detected receptors. In contrast, beta 2AR expressed in these cells exhibited a decrease of > or =50%. We determined that the basal turnover rates of the two subtypes were similar (t(1/2) approximately 7 h) and that agonist stimulation increased beta 2AR but not beta 1AR turnover. Blocking receptor trafficking to lysosomes with bafilomycin A1 had no effect on basal turnover of either subtype but blocked agonist-stimulated beta 2AR turnover. As beta 1AR mRNA levels increased in agonist-stimulated cells, beta 1AR up-regulation appeared to result from increased synthesis with no change in degradation. To explore the basis for the subtype differences, we expressed chimeras in which the C termini had been exchanged. Each chimera responded to persistent agonist stimulation based on the source of its C-tail; beta 1AR with a beta 2AR C-tail underwent down-regulation, and beta 2AR with a beta 1AR C-tail underwent up-regulation. The C-tails had a corresponding effect on agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation and internalization with the order being beta 2AR > beta 1AR with beta 2AR C-tail > beta 2AR with a beta 1AR C-tail > beta 1AR. As internalization may be a prerequisite for down-regulation, we addressed this possibility by co-expressing each subtype with arrestin-2. Although beta 1AR internalization was increased to that of beta 2AR, down-regulation still did not occur. Instead, beta 1AR accumulated inside the cells. We conclude that in unstimulated cells, both subtypes appear to be turned over by the same mechanism. Upon agonist stimulation, both subtypes are internalized, and beta 2AR but not beta 1AR undergoes lysosomal degradation, the fate of each subtype being regulated by determinants in its C-tail.     

Beta 2-adrenergic receptor stimulated,G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 mediated,phosphorylation of ribosomal protein P2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases are well characterized for their ability to phosphorylate and desensitize G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition to phosphorylating the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) and other receptors, G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) can also phosphorylate tubulin, a nonreceptor substrate. To identify novel nonreceptor substrates of GRK2, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to find cellular proteins that were phosphorylated upon agonist-stimulation of the beta2AR in a GRK2-dependent manner. The ribosomal protein P2 was identified as an endogenous HEK-293 cell protein whose phosphorylation was increased following agonist stimulation of the beta2AR under conditions where tyrosine kinases, PKC and PKA, were inhibited. P2 along with its other family members, P0 and P1, constitutes a part of the elongation factor-binding site connected to the GTPase center in the 60S ribosomal subunit. Phosphorylation of P2 is known to regulate protein synthesis in vitro. Further, P2 and P1 are shown to be good in vitro substrates for GRK2 with K(M) values approximating 1 microM. The phosphorylation sites in GRK2-phosphorylated P2 are identified (S102 and S105) and are identical to the sites known to regulate P2 activity. When the 60S subunit deprived of endogenous P1 and P2 is reconstituted with GRK2-phosphorylated P2 and unphosphorylated P1, translational activity is greatly enhanced. These findings suggest a previously unrecognized relationship between GPCR activation and the translational control of gene expression mediated by GRK2 activation and P2 phosphorylation and represent a potential novel signaling pathway responsible for P2 phosphorylation in mammals.     

The association of arrestin-3 with the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor depends mostly on receptor activation rather than on receptor phosphorylation.

Although the involvement of the nonvisual arrestins in the agonist-induced internalization of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) has been documented previously with the use of dominant-negative mutants, a physical association of the nonvisual arrestins with the hLHR in intact cells has not been established. In the studies presented herein, we used a cross-linking/coimmunoprecipitation/immunoblotting approach as well as confocal microscopy to document the association of the hLHR with the nonvisual arrestins in co-transfected 293 cells. We also used this approach to examine the relative importance of receptor activation and receptor phosphorylation in the formation of this complex. Using hLHR mutants that impair phosphorylation, activation, or both, we show that the formation of the hLHR-nonvisual arrestin complex depends mostly on the agonist-induced activation of the hLHR rather than on the phosphorylation of the hLHR. These results stand in contrast to those obtained with several other G protein-coupled receptors (i.e. the beta2-adrenergic receptor, the m2 muscarinic receptor, rhodopsin, and the type 1A angiotensin receptor) where arrestin binding depends mostly on receptor phosphorylation rather than on receptor activation. We have also examined the association of the nonvisual arrestins with naturally occurring gain-of-function mutations of the hLHR found in boys with Leydig cell hyperplasia or Leydig cell adenomas. Our results show that these mutants associate with the nonvisual arrestins in an agonist-independent fashion.     

Differential roles of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and adaptor protein 2 in G protein-coupled receptor trafficking

The non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, play a critical role in regulating the signaling and trafficking of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Molecular insight into the role of arrestins in GPCR trafficking has suggested that arrestin interaction with clathrin, beta(2)-adaptin (the beta-subunit of the adaptor protein AP2), and phosphoinositides contributes to this process. In the present study, we have attempted to better define the molecular basis and functional role of arrestin-2 interaction with clathrin and beta(2)-adaptin. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that the C-terminal region of arrestin-2 mediated beta(2)-adaptin and clathrin interaction with Phe-391 and Arg-395 having an essential role in beta(2)-adaptin binding and LIELD (residues 376-380) having an essential role in clathrin binding. Interestingly, arrestin-2-R169E, an activated form of arrestin that binds to GPCRs in a phosphorylation-independent manner, has significantly enhanced binding to beta(2)-adaptin and clathrin. This suggests that receptor-induced conformational changes in the C-terminal tail of arrestin-2 will likely play a major role in mediating arrestin interaction with clathrin-coated pits. In an effort to clarify the role of these interactions in GPCR trafficking we generated arrestin mutants that were completely and selectively defective in either clathrin (arrestin-2-DeltaLIELD) or beta(2)-adaptin (arrestin-2-F391A) interaction. Analysis of these mutants in COS-1 cells revealed that arrestin/clathrin interaction was essential for agonist-promoted internalization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, while arrestin/beta(2)-adaptin interaction appeared less critical. Arrestin-2 mutants defective in both clathrin and beta(2)-adaptin binding functioned as effective dominant negatives in HEK293 cells and significantly attenuated beta(2)-adrenergic receptor internalization. These mutants should prove useful in better defining the role of arrestins in mediating receptor trafficking.     

Regulation of arrestin-3 phosphorylation by casein kinase II

Arrestins play an important role in regulating the function of G protein-coupled receptors including receptor desensitization, internalization, down-regulation, and signaling via nonreceptor tyrosine kinases and mitogen-activated protein kinases. Previous studies have revealed that arrestins themselves are also subject to regulation. In the present study, we focused on identifying potential mechanisms involved in regulating the function of arrestin-3. Using metabolic labeling, phosphoamino acid analysis, and mutagenesis studies, we found that arrestin-3 is constitutively phosphorylated at Thr-382 and becomes dephosphorylated upon beta(2)-adrenergic receptor activation in COS-1 cells. Casein kinase II (CKII) appears to be the major kinase mediating arrestin-3 phosphorylation, since 1) Thr-382 is contained within a canonical consensus sequence for CKII phosphorylation and 2) wild type arrestin-3 but not a T382A mutant is phosphorylated by CKII in vitro. Functional analysis reveals that mutants mimicking the phosphorylated (T382E) and dephosphorylated (T382A or T382V) states of arrestin-3 promote beta(2)-adrenergic receptor internalization and bind clathrin, beta-adaptin, and Src to comparable levels as wild type arrestin-3. This suggests that the phosphorylation of arrestin-3 does not directly regulate interaction with endocytic (clathrin, beta-adaptin) or signaling (Src) components and is in contrast to arrestin-2, where phosphorylation appears to regulate interaction with clathrin and Src. However, additional analysis reveals that arrestin-3 phosphorylation may regulate formation of a large arrestin-3-containing protein complex. Differences between the regulatory roles of arrestin-2 and -3 phosphorylation may contribute to the different cellular functions of these proteins in G protein-coupled receptor signaling and regulation.     

Arrestin binding to the G protein-coupled N-formyl peptide receptor is regulated by the conserved "DRY" sequence

Following activation by ligand, the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) undergoes processing events initiated by phosphorylation that lead to receptor desensitization and internalization. Our previous results have shown that FPR internalization can occur in the absence of receptor desensitization, suggesting that FPR desensitization and internalization are controlled by distinct mechanisms. More recently, we have provided evidence that internalization of the FPR occurs via a mechanism that is independent of the actions of arrestin, dynamin, and clathrin. In the present report, we demonstrate that stimulation of the FPR with agonist leads to a significant translocation of arrestin-2 from the cytosol to the membrane. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that the translocated arrestin-2 is highly colocalized with the ligand-bound FPR. A D71A mutant FPR, which does not undergo activation or phosphorylation in response to ligand, did not colocalize with arrestin-2. Surprisingly, an R123G mutant FPR, which does not bind G protein but does become phosphorylated and subsequently internalized, also did not bind arrestin. These results indicate that arrestin binding is not required for FPR internalization and demonstrate for the first time that a common motif, the conserved "DRY" domain of G protein-coupled receptors, is essential for phosphorylation-dependent arrestin binding, as well as G protein activation.     

Novel mutants of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor reveal amino acids relevant for receptor activation

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors like the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor results in conformational changes that ultimately lead to signal propagation through a G protein to an effector like adenylyl cyclase. In this study we identified amino acids that seem to be critical for activation of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor. Activation patterns of mutant receptors were analyzed using two structurally different ligands for beta-adrenergic receptors that both are mixed agonist/antagonists. Broxaterol and terbutaline are agonists at beta(2)- and beta(3)-receptors; however, they act as antagonists at the beta(1)-subtype. We reasoned that this functional selectivity may be reflected by a corresponding sequence pattern in the receptor subtypes. Therefore, we exchanged single amino acids of the beta(1)-adrenergic receptor for residues that were identical in the beta(2)- and beta(3)-subtypes but different in the beta(1)-receptor. Pharmacological characterization of such receptor mutants revealed that binding of a panel of agonists and antagonists including broxaterol and terbutaline was unaltered. However, two of the mutants (I185V and D212N) were activated by broxaterol and terbutaline, which acted as antagonists at the wild-type receptor. Two additional mutants (V120L and K253R) could be activated by terbutaline alone, which is structurally more closely related to endogenous catecholamines like epinephrine than to broxaterol. A model of the human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor showed that the four gain-of-function mutations are outside of the putative ligand-binding domain substantiating the lack of an effect of the mutations on binding characteristics. These results support the notion that Val-120, Ile-185, Asp-212, and Lys-253 are critically involved in conformational changes occurring during receptor activation.     

Post-endocytic fates of delta-opioid receptor are regulated by GRK2-mediated receptor phosphorylation and distinct beta-arrestin isoforms

Once internalized, some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can recycle back to the cell surface, while some of them are delivered to lysosomes for degradation. Because recycling and degradation represent two opposing receptor fates, understanding the mechanisms that determine post-endocytic fate of GPCRs is of great importance. Our recent work has verified that agonist-induced internalization of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) employs both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms in HEK293 cells. To investigate whether these two internalization mechanisms work differently in receptor regulation, we monitored receptor post-endocytic fates using flow cytometry, surface receptor biotinylation and radioligand binding assays. Results showed that the internalized wild type DOR could either recycle to the cell surface or be degraded. Mutant DOR M4/5/6, which lacks all three G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylation sites, could also internalize upon agonist challenge although in a reduced level as compared with the wild type counterpart. However, the internalized mutant DOR could not recycle back to the cell surface and all mutant DOR was degraded after internalization. Inhibition of GRK2 expression by GRK2 RNAi also strongly attenuated recycling of DOR. Furthermore, overexpression of GRK2, which significantly increased receptor phosphorylation and internalization, also targeted more internalized receptors to the recycling pathway. These data suggest that GRK2-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation is critically involved in DOR internalization and recycling, and the phosphorylation-independent internalization leads to receptor degradation. Data obtained from beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 RNAi experiments indicated that both beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 participate in phosphorylation-dependent internalization and the subsequent recycling of DOR. However, phosphorylation-independent internalization and degradation of DOR were strongly blocked by beta-arrestin2 RNAi, but not beta-arrestin1 RNAi. Taken together, these data demonstrate for the first time that GRK2 phosphorylation-dependent internalization mediated by both beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 leads DOR to recycle, whereas GRK2-independent internalization mediated by beta-arrestin2 alone leads to receptor degradation. Thus, the post-endocytic fate of internalized DOR can be regulated by GRK2-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation as well as distinct beta-arrestin isoforms.