Molecular dynamic simulations of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-d(GG) intrastand cross-links reveal differences in their conformational dynamics

Mismatch repair proteins, DNA damage-recognition proteins and translesion DNA polymerases discriminate between Pt-GG adducts containing cis-diammine ligands (formed by cisplatin (CP) and carboplatin) and trans-RR-diaminocyclohexane ligands (formed by oxaliplatin (OX)) and this discrimination is thought to be important in determining differences in the efficacy, toxicity and mutagenicity of these platinum anticancer agents. We have postulated that these proteins recognize differences in conformation and/or conformational dynamics of the DNA containing the adducts. We have previously determined the NMR solution structure of OX-DNA, CP-DNA and undamaged duplex DNA in the 5'-d(CCTCAGGCCTCC)-3' sequence context and have shown the existence of several conformational differences in the vicinity of the Pt-GG adduct. Here we have used molecular dynamics simulations to explore differences in the conformational dynamics between OX-DNA, CP-DNA and undamaged DNA in the same sequence context. Twenty-five 10 ns unrestrained fully solvated molecular dynamics simulations were performed starting from two different DNA conformations using AMBER v8.0. All 25 simulations reached equilibrium within 4 ns, were independent of the starting structure and were in close agreement with previous crystal and NMR structures. Our data show that the cis-diammine (CP) ligand preferentially forms hydrogen bonds on the 5' side of the Pt-GG adduct, while the trans-RR-diaminocyclohexane (OX) ligand preferentially forms hydrogen bonds on the 3' side of the adduct. In addition, our data show that these differences in hydrogen bond formation are strongly correlated with differences in conformational dynamics, specifically the fraction of time spent in different DNA conformations in the vicinity of the adduct, for CP- and OX-DNA adducts. We postulate that differential recognition of CP- and OX-GG adducts by mismatch repair proteins, DNA damage-recognition proteins and DNA polymerases may be due, in part, to differences in the fraction of time that the adducts spend in a conformation favorable for protein binding.     

Translesion synthesis past platinum DNA adducts by human DNA polymerase mu

DNA polymerase mu (pol mu) is a member of the pol X family of DNA polymerases, and it shares a number of characteristics of both DNA polymerase beta (pol beta) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). Because pol beta has been shown to perform translesion DNA synthesis past cisplatin (CP)- and oxaliplatin (OX)-GG adducts, we determined the ability of pol mu to bypass these lesions. Pol mu bypassed CP and OX adducts with an efficiency of 14-35% compared to chain elongation on undamaged DNA, which is second only to pol eta in terms of bypass efficiency. The relative ability of pol mu to bypass CP and OX adducts was dependent on both template structure and sequence context. Since pol mu has been shown to be more efficient on gapped DNA templates than on primed single-stranded DNA templates, we determined the ability of pol mu to bypass Pt-DNA adducts on both primed single-stranded and gapped templates. The bypass of Pt-DNA adducts by pol mu was highly error-prone on all templates, resulting in 2, 3, and 4 nt deletions. We postulate that bypass of Pt-DNA adducts by pol mu may involve looping out the Pt-GG adduct to allow chain elongation downstream of the adduct. This reaction appears to be facilitated by the presence of a downstream "acceptor" and a gap large enough to provide undamaged template DNA for elongation past the adduct, although gapped DNA is clearly not required for bypass.     

Specificity of platinum-DNA adduct repair

Cell lines with resistance to cisplatin and carboplatin often retain sensitivity to platinum complexes with different carrier ligands (e.g., oxaliplatin and JM216). HeLa cell extracts were shown to excise cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and JM216 adducts with equal efficiency, suggesting that nucleotide excision repair does not contribute to the carrier-ligand specificity of platinum resistance. We have shown previously that the extent of replicative bypass in vivo is influenced by the carrier ligand of the platinum adducts. The specificity of replicative bypass may be determined by the DNA polymerase complexes that catalyze translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts, by the mismatch-repair system that removes newly synthesized DNA opposite Pt-DNA adducts, and/or by DNA damage-recognition proteins that bind to the Pt-DNA adducts and block translesion synthesis. Primer extension on DNA templates containing site-specifically placed cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or JM216 Pt-GG adducts revealed that the eukaryotic DNA polymerases beta, zeta, gamma and HIV-1 RT had a similar specificity for translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts (oxaliplatin > or = cisplatin > JM216). In addition, defects in the mismatch-repair proteins hMSH6 and hMLH1 led to increased replicative bypass of cisplatin adducts, but not of oxaliplatin adducts. Finally, primer extension assays performed in the presence of HMG1, which is known to recognize cisplatin-damaged DNA, revealed that inhibition of translesion synthesis by HMG1 also depended on the carrier ligand of the Pt-DNA adduct (cisplatin > oxaliplatin = JM216). These studies show that DNA polymerases, the mismatch-repair system and damage-recognition proteins can all impart specificity to replicative bypass of Pt-DNA adducts. Replicative bypass, in turn, may influence the carrier-ligand specificity of resistance.     

The effect of DNA structure on the catalytic efficiency and fidelity of human DNA polymerase beta on templates with platinum-DNA adducts

DNA adducts formed by platinum-based anticancer drugs interfere with DNA replication. The carrier ligand of the platinum compound is likely to affect the conformation of the Pt-DNA adducts. In addition, the conformation of the adduct can also change upon binding of damaged DNA to the active site of DNA polymerase. From the crystal structures of pol beta ternary complexes it is evident that undamaged gapped and primed single-stranded (non-gapped) DNA templates exist in very different conformations when bound to pol beta. Therefore, one might expect that the constraints imposed on the damaged templates by binding to the polymerase active site should also affect the conformation of the Pt-DNA adducts and their ability to inhibit DNA replication. In support of this hypothesis we have found that the efficiency, carrier ligand specificity, site of discrimination (3'-G versus 5'-G of the Pt-GG adducts), and fidelity of translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts by pol beta are strongly affected by the structure of the DNA template. Previous studies have suggested that the conformation of Pt-DNA adducts may be affected by the sequence context of the adduct. In support of this hypothesis, our data show that sequence context affects the efficiency, fidelity, and pattern of misincorporation by pol beta.     

Structural basis for the sequence-dependent effects of platinum–DNA adducts

The differences in efficacy and molecular mechanisms of platinum based anti-cancer drugs cisplatin (CP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have been hypothesized to be in part due to the differential binding affinity of cellular and damage recognition proteins to CP and OX adducts formed on adjacent guanines in genomic DNA. HMGB1a in particular exhibits higher binding affinity to CP-GG adducts, and the extent of discrimination between CP- and OX-GG adducts is dependent on the bases flanking the adducts. However, the structural basis for this differential binding is not known. Here, we show that the conformational dynamics of CP- and OX-GG adducts are distinct and depend on the sequence context of the adduct. Molecular dynamics simulations of the Pt-GG adducts in the TGGA sequence context revealed that even though the major conformations of CP- and OX-GG adducts were similar, the minor conformations were distinct. Using the pattern of hydrogen bond formation between the Pt–ammines and the adjacent DNA bases, we identified the major and minor conformations sampled by Pt–DNA. We found that the minor conformations sampled exclusively by the CP-GG adduct exhibit structural properties that favor binding by HMGB1a, which may explain its higher binding affinity to CP-GG adducts, while these conformations are not sampled by OX-GG adducts because of the constraints imposed by its cyclohexane ring, which may explain the negligible binding affinity of HMGB1a for OX-GG adducts in the TGGA sequence context. Based on these results, we postulate that the constraints imposed by the cyclohexane ring of OX affect the DNA conformations explored by OX-GG adduct compared to those of CP-GG adduct, which may influence the binding affinities of HMG-domain proteins for Pt-GG adducts, and that these conformations are further influenced by the DNA sequence context of the Pt-GG adduct.     

Protein interactions with platinum-DNA adducts: from structure to function

Because of the efficacy of cisplatin and carboplatin in a wide variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, hundreds of platinum(II) and platinum(IV) complexes have been synthesized and evaluated as anticancer agents over the past 30 years. Of the many third generation platinum compounds evaluated to date, only oxaliplatin has been approved for clinical usage in the United States. Thus, it is important to understand the mechanistic basis for the differences in efficacy, mutagenicity and tumor range between cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Cisplatin and oxaliplain form the same types of adducts at the same sites on DNA. The most abundant adduct for both compounds is the Pt-GG intrastrand diadduct. Cisplatin-GG adducts are preferentially recognized by mismatch repair proteins and some damage-recognition proteins, and this differential recognition of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts is thought to contribute to the differences in cytotoxicity and tumor range of cisplatin and oxaliplatin. A detailed kinetic analysis of the insertion and extension steps of dNTP incorporation in the vicinity of the adduct shows that both pol beta and pol eta catalyze translesion synthesis past oxaliplatin-GG adducts with greater efficiency than past cisplatin-GG adducts. In the case of pol eta, the efficiency and fidelity of translesion synthesis in vitro is very similar to that previously observed with cyclobutane TT dimers, suggesting that pol eta is likely to be involved in error-free bypass of Pt adducts in vivo. This has been confirmed for cisplatin by comparing the cisplatin-induced mutation frequency in human fibroblast cell lines with and without pol eta. Thus, the greater efficiency of bypass of oxaliplatin-GG adducts by pol eta is likely to explain the lower mutagenicity of oxaliplatin compared to cisplatin. The ability of these cellular proteins to discriminate between cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts suggest that there exist significant conformational differences between the adducts, yet the crystal structures of the cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts were very similar. We have recently solved the solution structure of the oxaliplatin-GG adduct and have shown that it is significantly different from the previously published solution structures of the cisplatin-GG adducts. Furthermore, the observed differences in conformation provide a logical explanation for the differential recognition of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by mismatch repair and damage-recognition proteins. Molecular modeling studies are currently underway to analyze the mechanistic basis for the differential bypass of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by DNA polymerases.     

Efficient translesion replication past oxaliplatin and cisplatin GpG adducts by human DNA polymerase eta

Platinum anticancer agents form bulky DNA adducts which are thought to exert their cytotoxic effect by blocking DNA replication. Translesion synthesis, one of the pathways of postreplication repair, is thought to account for some resistance to DNA damage and much of the mutagenicity of bulky DNA adducts in dividing cells. Oxaliplatin has been shown to be effective in cisplatin-resistant cell lines and less mutagenic than cisplatin in the Ames assay. We have shown that the eukaryotic DNA polymerases yeast pol zeta, human pol beta, and human pol gamma bypass oxaliplatin-GG adducts more efficiently than cisplatin-GG adducts. Human pol eta, a product of the XPV gene, has been shown to catalyze efficient translesion synthesis past cis, syn-cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. In the present study we compared translesion synthesis past different Pt-GG adducts by human pol eta. Our data show that, similar to other eukaryotic DNA polymerases, pol eta bypasses oxaliplatin-GG adducts more efficiently than cisplatin-GG adducts. However, pol eta-catalyzed translesion replication past Pt-DNA adducts was more efficient and less accurate than that seen for previously tested polymerases. We show that the efficiency and fidelity of translesion replication past Pt-DNA adducts appear to be determined by both the structure of the adduct and the DNA polymerase active site.     

Role of structure and dynamics of DNA with cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts in various sequence contexts on binding of HMGB1a

Anti-cancer drugs, such as cisplatin and oxaliplatin, covalently bind to adjacent guanine bases in DNA to form intra-strand adducts. Differential recognition of drug–DNA adducts by the protein HMGB1a has been related to the differences in efficacy of these drugs in tumours. Additionally, the bases flanking the adduct (the sequence context) also have a marked effect on HMGB1a binding affinity. We perform atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of DNA with cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts in four sequence contexts (AGGC, CGGA, TGGA and TGGT) in the absence and presence of HMGB1a. The structure of HMGB1a-bound drug–DNA molecules is independent of sequence and drug identity, confirming that differential recognition cannot be explained by the protein-bound structure. The differences in the static and conformational dynamics of the drug–DNA structures in the absence of the protein explain some but not all trends in differential binding affinity of HMGB1a. Since the minor groove width and helical bend of all drug–DNA molecules in the unbound state are lower than the protein-bound state, HMGB1a must actively deform the DNA during binding. The thermodynamic pathway between the unbound and protein-bound states could be an additional factor in the binding affinity of HMGB1a for drug–DNA adducts in various sequence contexts.     

DNA oligonucleotides with A, T, G or C opposite an abasic site: structure and dynamics

Abasic sites are common DNA lesions resulting from spontaneous depurination and excision of damaged nucleobases by DNA repair enzymes. However, the influence of the local sequence context on the structure of the abasic site and ultimately, its recognition and repair, remains elusive. In the present study, duplex DNAs with three different bases (G, C or T) opposite an abasic site have been synthesized in the same sequence context (5′-CCA AAG₆ XA₈C CGG G-3′, where X denotes the abasic site) and characterized by 2D NMR spectroscopy. Studies on a duplex DNA with an A opposite the abasic site in the same sequence has recently been reported [Chen,J., Dupradeau,F.-Y., Case,D.A., Turner,C.J. and Stubbe,J. (2007) Nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies and molecular modeling of duplex DNA containing normal and 4′-oxidized abasic sites. Biochemistry, 46, 3096–3107]. Molecular modeling based on NMR-derived distance and dihedral angle restraints and molecular dynamics calculations have been applied to determine structural models and conformational flexibility of each duplex. The results indicate that all four duplexes adopt an overall B-form conformation with each unpaired base stacked between adjacent bases intrahelically. The conformation around the abasic site is more perturbed when the base opposite to the lesion is a pyrimidine (C or T) than a purine (G or A). In both the former cases, the neighboring base pairs (G6-C21 and A8-T19) are closer to each other than those in B-form DNA. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that transient H-bond interactions between the unpaired pyrimidine (C20 or T20) and the base 3′ to the abasic site play an important role in perturbing the local conformation. These results provide structural insight into the dynamics of abasic sites that are intrinsically modulated by the bases opposite the abasic site.     

Damaged DNA-binding proteins: recognition of N-acetoxy-acetylaminofluorene-induced DNA adducts.

Proteins which bind to the DNA damaged by genotoxic agents can be detected in all living organisms. Damage-recognition proteins are thought to be generally involved in DNA repair mechanisms. On the other hand, the relevance to DNA repair of some other proteins which show elevated affinity to damaged DNA (e.g. HMG-box containing proteins or histone H1) has not been established. Using the electrophoretic mobility-shift assay we have investigated damage-recognition proteins in nuclei from rat hepatocytes. We detected two different protein complexes which preferentially bound the DNA damaged by N-acetoxy-acetylaminofluorene. One of them also recognized the DNA damaged by benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (yet with much lower efficiency). The proteins which bind to damaged DNA are permanently present in rat cells and their level does not change after treatment of animals with the carcinogens. Differences in the affinity of the detected damage-recognition proteins to DNA lesion evoked by either carcinogen did not correlate with more efficient removal from hepatic DNA of 2-acetylaminofluorene-induced adducts than benzo(a)pyrene-induced ones.     

Solution structures of a DNA dodecamer duplex with and without a cisplatin 1,2-d(GG) intrastrand cross-link: comparison with the same DNA duplex containing an oxaliplatin 1,2-d(GG) intrastrand cross-link

Proteins that discriminate between cisplatin-DNA adducts and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts are thought to be responsible for the differences in tumor range, toxicity, and mutagenicity of these two important chemotherapeutic agents. However, the structural basis for differential protein recognition of these adducts has not been determined and could be important for the design of more effective platinum anticancer agents. We have determined high-resolution NMR structures for cisplatin-GG and undamaged DNA dodecamers in the AGGC sequence context and have compared these structures with the oxaliplatin-GG structure in the same sequence context determined previously in our laboratory. This structural study allows the first direct comparison of cisplatin-GG DNA and oxaliplatin-GG DNA solution structures referenced to undamaged DNA in the same sequence context. Non-hydrogen atom rmsds of 0.81 and 1.21 were determined for the 15 lowest-energy structures for cisplatin-GG DNA and undamaged DNA, respectively, indicating good structural convergence. The theoretical NOESY spectra obtained by back-calculation from the final average structures showed excellent agreement with the experimental data, indicating that the final structures are consistent with the NMR data. Several significant conformational differences were observed between the cisplatin-GG adduct and the oxaliplatin-GG adduct, including buckle at the 5' G6.C19 base pair, opening at the 3' G7.C18 base pair, twist at the A5G6.T20C19 base pair step, slide, twist, and roll at the G6G7.C19C18 base pair step, slide at the G7C8.C18G17 base pair step, G6G7 dihedral angle, and overall bend angle. We hypothesize that these conformational differences may be related to the ability of various DNA repair proteins, DNA binding proteins, and DNA polymerases to discriminate between cisplatin-GG and oxaliplatin-GG adducts.     

Role of base sequence context in conformational equilibria and nucleotide excision repair of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-adenine adducts

We investigate the influence of base sequence context on the conformations of the 10S (+)- and 10R (-)-trans-anti-[BP]-N(6)-dA adducts through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with free energy calculations, and relate the structural findings to results of nucleotide excision repair (NER) assays in human cell extracts. In previous studies, these adducts were studied in the CA*A sequence context, and here we report results for the CA*C sequence. Our simulations indicate that the base sequence context affects the syn-anti conformational equilibrium in the 10S (+) adduct by modulating the barrier heights between these states on the energy surface, with a higher barrier in the CA*C case. Our nucleotide excision repair assay finds greater NER susceptibilities in the 10S (+) adduct for the CA*C sequence context. A structural rationale ties together these results. A sequence specific hydrogen bond, accompanied by a significantly increased roll and consequent bending in the 10S (+) adduct, has been found in our simulations for the CA*C sequence, which could account for the enhanced nucleotide excision repair as well as the syn-anti equilibrium difference we observe in this isomer and sequence. Such sequence specific differential repair could contribute to the existence of mutational hotspots and thereby contribute to the complexity of cancer initiation.     

Structural Basis for the Inefficient Nucleotide Incorporation Opposite Cisplatin-DNA Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase β

Human DNA polymerase β (polβ) has been suggested to play a role in cisplatin resistance, especially in polβ-overexpressing cancer cells. Polβ has been shown to accurately albeit slowly bypass the cisplatin-1,2-d(GpG) (Pt-GG) intramolecular cross-link in vitro. Currently, the structural basis for the inefficient Pt-GG bypass mechanism of polβ is unknown. To gain structural insights into the mechanism, we determined two ternary structures of polβ incorporating dCTP opposite the templating Pt-GG lesion in the presence of the active site Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺. The Mg²⁺-bound structure shows that the bulky Pt-GG adduct is accommodated in the polβ active site without any steric hindrance. In addition, both guanines of the Pt-GG lesion form Watson-Crick base pairing with the primer terminus dC and the incoming dCTP, providing the structural basis for the accurate bypass of the Pt-GG adduct by polβ. The Mn²⁺-bound structure shows that polβ adopts a catalytically suboptimal semiclosed conformation during the insertion of dCTP opposite the templating Pt-GG, explaining the inefficient replication across the Pt-GG lesion by polβ. Overall, our studies provide the first structural insights into the mechanism of the potential polβ-mediated cisplatin resistance.     

Solution structure of a DNA duplex containing a cis-diammineplatinum(II) 1,3-d(GTG) intrastrand cross-link, a major adduct in cells treated with the anticancer drug carboplatin.

The platinum 1,3-d(GXG) intrastrand cross-link is one of the adducts formed in the reaction of the antitumor drug cisplatin with DNA, and in fact the major adduct found in cells treated with the cisplatin analogue carboplatin. To determine the 3D structure of this adduct, the duplex d(CTCTGTGTCTC).d(GAGACACAGAG)], where GTG denotes a platinum 1,3-intrastrand cross-link, was prepared and studied with high-resolution (1)H NMR. The solution structure was determined using the SPEDREF protocol, which includes an iterative NOE-restrained refinement procedure. Calculated and recorded NOE spectra were found to be in good agreement (NMR R factor 22%). The studied duplex is more distorted from B-DNA than previously determined structures of the 1,2-d(GG) intrastrand adducts. The base pairing is lost for the 5'G-C and the central T-A base pair in the GTG lesion, and the central thymine is extruded from the minor groove. To accommodate this lesion, the minor groove is widened, and the 5'-guanine ribose adopts an N-type conformation. The helix is unwound locally and is significantly bent toward the major groove. Significant difference between the structural distortion of the 1, 3-d(GTG) cross-link and other Pt-DNA cross-links sheds new light on the observed differences in protein recognition of these lesions, and thus on the possible differences in mechanisms of action of the various Pt-DNA adducts formed in treatment with platinum anticancer complexes.     

DNA sequence context modulates the impact of a cisplatin 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link on the conformational and thermodynamic properties of duplex DNA

The anticancer activity of cisplatin derives from its ability to bind and cross-link DNA, with the major adduct being the 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link. Here, the consequences of this adduct on the conformation, thermal stability, and energetics of duplex DNA are assessed, and the modulation of these parameters by the sequence context of the adduct is evaluated. The properties of a family of 15-mer DNA duplexes containing a single 1,2-d(GpG) cis-?Pt(NH(3))(2)?(2+) intrastrand cross-link are probed in different sequence contexts where the flanking base-pairs are systematically varied from T.A to C.G to A.T. By using a combination of spectroscopic and calorimetric techniques, the structural, thermal, and thermodynamic properties of each duplex, both with and without the cross-link, are characterized. Circular dichroism spectroscopic data reveal that the cross-link alters the structure of the host duplex in a manner consistent with a shift from a B-like to an A-like conformation. Thermal denaturation data reveal that the cross-link induces substantial thermal and thermodynamic destabilization of the host duplex. Significantly, the magnitudes of these cross-link-induced effects on duplex structure, thermal stability, and energetics are influenced by the bases that flank the adduct. The presence of flanking A.T base-pairs, relative to T.A or C.G base-pairs, enhances the extent of cross-link-induced alteration to an A-like conformation and dampens the extent of cross-link-induced duplex destabilization. These results are discussed in terms of available structural data, and in terms of the selective recognition of cisplatin-DNA adducts by HMG-domain proteins.     

Ca(2+)-mediated inhibition of a nuclear protein that recognizes UV-damaged DNA and is constitutively overexpressed in resistant human cells: DNA-binding assay.

A nuclear protein that recognizes UV-damaged DNA was detected from HeLa cells using DNA-binding assay. Treatment of cells with Ca2+ ionophore (A23187) caused a dramatic inhibition of the damage-recognition activity. In contrast, in vitro treatment of nuclear extracts with agents that affect protein conformation (such as urea, NP40 and Ca2+) did not significantly affect on the damage-recognition activity. The Ca(2+)-mediated inhibition of UV damage recognition was reconstituted by the addition of the cytosolic extracts, suggesting that the Ca2+ effect does not directly act on the UV damage-recognition protein. The expression of the detected nuclear protein was increased in UV-resistant HeLa cells. In contrast, the level of this protein was dramatically reduced in UV-sensitive xeroderma pigmentosum group A cells. In addition, UV damage-recognition protein is resistant to RNase, and is independent of the previously identified proteins that bind cisplatin-DNA adduct. These findings implied that the recognition of UV-DNA adduct is modulated by the intracellular level of Ca2+.     

Two Distinct Mechanisms for Actin Capping Protein Regulation—Steric and Allosteric Inhibition

The actin capping protein (CP) tightly binds to the barbed end of actin filaments, thus playing a key role in actin-based lamellipodial dynamics. V-1 and CARMIL proteins directly bind to CP and inhibit the filament capping activity of CP. V-1 completely inhibits CP from interacting with the barbed end, whereas CARMIL proteins act on the barbed end-bound CP and facilitate its dissociation from the filament (called uncapping activity). Previous studies have revealed the striking functional differences between the two regulators. However, the molecular mechanisms describing how these proteins inhibit CP remains poorly understood. Here we present the crystal structures of CP complexed with V-1 and with peptides derived from the CP-binding motif of CARMIL proteins (CARMIL, CD2AP, and CKIP-1). V-1 directly interacts with the primary actin binding surface of CP, the C-terminal region of the α-subunit. Unexpectedly, the structures clearly revealed the conformational flexibility of CP, which can be attributed to a twisting movement between the two domains. CARMIL peptides in an extended conformation interact simultaneously with the two CP domains. In contrast to V-1, the peptides do not directly compete with the barbed end for the binding surface on CP. Biochemical assays revealed that the peptides suppress the interaction between CP and V-1, despite the two inhibitors not competing for the same binding site on CP. Furthermore, a computational analysis using the elastic network model indicates that the interaction of the peptides alters the intrinsic fluctuations of CP. Our results demonstrate that V-1 completely sequesters CP from the barbed end by simple steric hindrance. By contrast, CARMIL proteins allosterically inhibit CP, which appears to be a prerequisite for the uncapping activity. Our data suggest that CARMIL proteins down-regulate CP by affecting its conformational dynamics. This conceptually new mechanism of CP inhibition provides a structural basis for the regulation of the barbed end elongation in cells.