生物样品离子刻蚀法

早在一个世纪前人们就认识离子的轰击作用,开始在金属学、固体电子学中应用。近年来离子刻蚀技术已成为扫描电镜生物样品制备中的一种新方法。利用高速运动的离子流不断轰击样品表面,使表面的原子和离子发生溅射和剥离.这种溅射一般为物理溅射和化学溅射,其速率取决于刻蚀体和被刻蚀体的性质和刻蚀条件。生物样品的细胞膜表面结构被一层糖蛋白或糖脂掩盖,有些材料如胃、小肠等表面还附有许多粘液,用常规方法很难洗净,就会影响电镜观察效果。应用超声波方法清洗,由于功率和时间较难控制,一旦掌握不好,细胞表面结构就     

低能离子束介导外源基因转化烟草的研究

以烟草ＮＣ－８９种子为材料,用显微扫描电镜（ＥＳＭ）和电子自旋共振（ＥＳＲ）波谱仪研究氮离子束对烟草种子表面的刻蚀作用及能量沉积产生自由基的间接效应,为离子束介导转移外源基因提供了形态结构依据。将烟草种子用２０Ｋｅｖ的氮离子束处理后,浸入含有ＰＢⅠ１２１质粒的缓冲介质中,在含有卡那霉素１００ｍｇ／Ｌ的ＭＳ０培养基上继代筛选,得到３株抗性植株。取抗性植株的叶片,经组织培养后得到再生抗性植株。经过ＰＣＲ及ｓｏｕｔｈｅｒｎ杂交分析,证明外源基因已转入烟草。     

遮荫对库拉索芦荟细胞超微结构和芦荟素含量的影响

分别用透射电子显微镜技术、高效液相色谱法研究了生长在遮荫和自然光照条件下库拉索芦荟叶片的超微结构和芦荟素含量.电镜观察结果表明,遮荫处理6个月后,库拉索芦荟叶片细胞中叶绿体基粒数量减少,类囊体片层数目减少且排列疏松,质体中原来积累的淀粉粒逐渐减少直至消失;内质网、高尔基体等内膜系统不发达.高效液相色谱分析结果显示,生长在遮荫条件下的库拉索芦荟叶片,芦荟素含量明显低于生长在自然光照下的含量.其中,遮荫下幼叶芦荟素的含量是自然光照下的63.33%,而成熟叶芦荟素含量仅有自然光照下的23.77%.无论自然光下还是遮荫条件下生长的芦荟,芦荟素的含量与叶龄有显著的负相关性,遮荫对成熟叶的影响更大.综合两方面的实验结果认为,遮荫首先影响芦荟叶片细胞内膜系统的发育,进而限制了芦荟素的合成和运输,使芦荟叶片中芦荟素含量降低.     

3种芦荟属植物叶的表皮扫描电镜观察及芦荟素含量的测定

以库拉索芦荟、木立芦荟和皂质芦荟为材料,用扫描电镜观察其叶表皮气孔和角质膜的结构,用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定了3种芦荟属植物叶中芦荟素的含量。扫描电镜观察结果表明,3种芦荟叶表皮都覆盖有厚的角质膜,气孔下陷,表现出典型的旱生植物特征。但角质膜的纹饰和厚度在不同芦荟间有显着差异。木立芦荟角质膜表面呈瘤状突起,角质膜厚度为5～6μm,库拉索芦荟和皂质芦荟的角质膜表面较平,库拉索芦荟的角质膜厚度为3～4μm,皂质芦荟的角质膜厚度为8～10μm。高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定结果表明,木立芦荟叶含芦荟素最高,库拉索芦荟叶含量较低,而皂质芦荟叶含量最低。此外,本文还初步探讨了芦荟属植物叶表皮结构与芦荟素含量的关系。     

食管癌细胞与正常食管上皮细胞的扫描电镜观察

在透射电镜中,已发现食管癌管细胞与正常食管上皮细胞不仅具有细胞器的差异,而且细胞表面的微绒毛也有不同。由于透射电镜只能观察到细胞的某一切面,而不能观察细胞的立体图像,因之我们应用扫描电镜观察了培养的正常食管上皮与     

低能Ar^＋注入家蚕卵的生物学效应研究

家蚕作为鳞翅目昆虫的模式生物,是研究遗传和变异的极好模型.本文以家蚕卵为材料,研究不同能量和剂量的低能Ar+注入家蚕卵的生物学效应,结果表明:在真空10 min时间内,对家蚕卵的孵化无明显影响;在25 keV和30 keV的能量下,2.6～8×2.6×1015 ion/cm2的剂量作用于家蚕卵,对家蚕卵的孵化影响较为显著;在能量为30 keV, 剂量为8×2.6×1015 ion/cm2和9×2.6×1015 ion/cm2的Ar+轰击下,以扫描电镜可观察到蚕卵壳表面有明显的刻蚀痕迹;并且经30 keV, 9×2.6×1015 ion/cm2处理的饲养区至5龄期发现了3例突变性状.     

一份条斑和颖花异常水稻双突变体的形态特征和细胞学观察

在水稻遗传转化过程中发现一个不含外源基因的条斑和颖花异常的双突变体。该突变体的茎、叶、穗出现条斑。在分蘖盛期,一些叶片开始分岔或卷曲;花器官数目增多,表现为多内外稃,叶片状浆片,或浆片增大,雌雄蕊增多,颖花开裂。透射电镜对叶片白色组织细胞超微结构观察,发现细胞壁内陷,质体结构异常,不能发育出正常叶绿体所具有的片层和类囊体。叶绿素总含量和净光合速率明显低于野生型。突变体绿色组织部分中的细胞生长正常,但细胞较大。利用扫描电镜对花器官形态发生过程进行观察,雄蕊原基发育严重不同步,原基大小也不一样;心皮原基较小。     

珠芽蓼叶片对海拔变化的表型可塑性

采用石蜡制片、扫描电镜和透射电镜方法,研究了祁连山植被垂直分布带海拔2300、3200和3900 m珠芽蓼叶片组织结构、叶表皮特征和叶绿体超微结构对海拔升高的适应性变化.结果 表明:珠芽蓼为异面叶,随海拔升高,叶片表皮毛数目减少而直径增大变粗,表皮蜡质层结构更加致密.叶片厚度在海拔3200 m最大,分别比海拔2300和...     

增强UV-B辐射对3种芦荟蒽醌类物质含量的影响

以中华芦荟、库拉索芦荟和木立芦荟为试验材料,采用HPLC技术,研究了增强UV-B辐射对3种芦荟叶片中主要药用成分总蒽醌、芦荟素和芦荟大黄素含量的影响。结果显示:增强UV-B辐射20 d,每天处理6 h,库拉索芦荟和木立芦荟叶中总蒽醌、芦荟素、芦荟大黄素的含量增加,叶提取物中出峰数量增多,总峰面积增大;而中华芦荟中蒽醌类物质含量显著降低,叶提取物中出峰数量减少,总峰面积减少。研究表明,增强UV-B辐射能刺激库拉索芦荟和木立芦荟叶片中蒽醌类物质的积累和新物质的合成,而不利于中华芦荟蒽醌类物质的积累。     

秦冠苹果品种对苹果黑星病的组织学抗性研究

为揭示苹果抗病品种秦冠在组织细胞学水平上抗苹果黑星病的特征,本研究采用扫描和透射电镜技术,将苹果黑星菌Venturia inaequalis接种侵染寄主后,系统观察抗病品种秦冠和感病品种嘎啦的叶片组织和细胞结构变化。扫描电镜观察结果表明,黑星菌分生孢子悬浮液接种秦冠和嘎啦叶片48 h后,病菌沿叶脉生长扩展,其菌丝可从叶片气孔或直接侵入。透射电镜观察结果表明,秦冠叶片的角质层厚度明显高于嘎啦,其中秦冠角质层平均厚度为1.75 μm,嘎啦为1.06 μm。透射电镜观察结果表明,黑星菌菌丝在寄主叶肉细胞间扩展,导致嘎啦栅栏组织细胞萎缩,排列松散,叶绿体变形受损,细胞内出现较大淀粉粒和胞内物质外渗流失,并在后期发展成大量细胞坏死;而秦冠虽症状类似,但受损程度明显小于嘎啦。以上结果表明,秦冠在组织细胞学上对苹果黑星病具有抗侵染、抗扩展和延缓病程发展的作用,可作为苹果黑星病抗性育种材料加以利用。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor