Replication protein A interactions with DNA. 2. Characterization of double-stranded DNA-binding/helix-destabilization activities and the role of the zinc-finger domain in DNA interactions

Human replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is composed of subunits of 70, 32, and 14 kDa. RPA is required for multiple processes in cellular DNA metabolism. RPA has been reported to (1) bind with high affinity to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), (2) bind specifically to certain double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) sequences, and (3) have DNA helix-destabilizing ("unwinding") activity. We have characterized both dsDNA binding and helix destabilization. The affinity of RPA for dsDNA was lower than that of ssDNA and precisely correlated with the melting temperature of the DNA fragment. The rates of helix destabilization and dsDNA binding were similar, and both were slow relative to the rate of binding ssDNA. We have previously mapped the regions required for ssDNA binding [Walther et al. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3963-3973]. Here, we show that both helix-destabilization and dsDNA-binding activities map to the central DNA-binding domain of the 70-kDa subunit and that other domains of RPA are needed for optimal activity. We conclude that all types of RPA binding are manifestations of RPA ssDNA-binding activity and that dsDNA binding occurs when RPA destabilizes a region of dsDNA and binds to the resulting ssDNA. The 70-kDa subunit of all RPA homologues contains a highly conserved putative (C-X2-C-X13-C-X2-C) zinc finger. This motif directly interacts with DNA and contributes to dsDNA-binding/unwinding activity. Evidence is presented that a metal ion is required for the function of the zinc-finger motif.     

RPA phosphorylation in mitosis alters DNA binding and protein-protein interactions

The heterotrimeric DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), consists of 70-, 34-, and 14-kDa subunits and is involved in maintaining genomic stability by playing key roles in DNA replication, repair, and recombination. RPA participates in these processes through its interaction with other proteins and its strong affinity for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). RPA-p34 is phosphorylated in a cell-cycle-dependent fashion primarily at Ser-29 and Ser-23, which are consensus sites for Cdc2 cyclin-dependent kinase. By systematically examining RPA-p34 phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle, we have found there are distinct phosphorylated forms of RPA-p34 in different cell-cycle stages. We have isolated and purified a unique phosphorylated form of RPA that is specifically associated with the mitotic phase of the cell cycle. The mitotic form of RPA (m-hRPA) shows no difference in ssDNA binding activity as compared with recombinant RPA (r-hRPA), yet binds less efficiently to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). These data suggest that mitotic phosphorylation of RPA-p34 inhibits the destabilization of dsDNA by RPA complex, thereby decreasing the binding affinity for dsDNA. The m-hRPA also exhibits altered interactions with certain DNA replication and repair proteins. Using highly purified proteins, m-hRPA exhibited decreased binding to ATM, DNA pol alpha, and DNA-PK as compared to unphosphorylated recombinant RPA (r-hRPA). Dephosphorylation of m-hRPA was able to restore the interaction with each of these proteins. Interestingly, the interaction of RPA with XPA was not altered by RPA phosphorylation. These data suggest that phosphorylation of RPA-p34 plays an important role in regulating RPA functions in DNA metabolism by altering specific protein-protein interactions.     

Tyrosine phosphorylation enhances RAD52-mediated annealing by modulating its DNA binding

RAD52 protein has an important role in homology-directed DNA repair by mediating RAD51 nucleoprotein filament formation on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) protected by replication protein-A (RPA) and annealing of RPA-coated ssDNA. In human, cellular response to DNA damage includes phosphorylation of RAD52 by c-ABL kinase at tyrosine 104. To address how this phosphorylation modulates RAD52 function, we used an amber suppressor technology to substitute tyrosine 104 with chemically stable phosphotyrosine analogue (p-Carboxymethyl-L-phenylalanine, pCMF). The RAD52(Y104pCMF) retained ssDNA-binding activity characteristic of unmodified RAD52 but showed lower affinity for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) binding. Single-molecule analyses revealed that RAD52(Y104pCMF) specifically targets and wraps ssDNA. While RAD52(Y104pCMF) is confined to ssDNA region, unmodified RAD52 readily diffuses into dsDNA region. The Y104pCMF substitution also increased the ssDNA annealing rate and allowed overcoming the inhibitory effect of dsDNA. We propose that phosphorylation at Y104 enhances ssDNA annealing activity of RAD52 by attenuating dsDNA binding. Implications of phosphorylation-mediated activation of RAD52 annealing activity are discussed.     

The function of the secondary DNA-binding site of RecA protein during DNA strand exchange.

RecA protein features two distinct DNA-binding sites. During DNA strand exchange, the primary site binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), forming the helical RecA nucleoprotein filament. The weaker secondary site binds double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) during the homology search process. Here we demonstrate that this site has a second important function. It binds the ssDNA strand that is displaced from homologous duplex DNA during DNA strand exchange, stabilizing the initial heteroduplex DNA product. Although the high affinity of the secondary site for ssDNA is essential for DNA strand exchange, it renders DNA strand exchange sensitive to an excess of ssDNA which competes with dsDNA for binding. We further demonstrate that single-stranded DNA-binding protein can sequester ssDNA, preventing its binding to the secondary site and thereby assisting at two levels: it averts the inhibition caused by an excess of ssDNA and prevents the reversal of DNA strand exchange by removing the displaced strand from the secondary site.     

NMR study on the interaction between RPA and DNA decamer containing cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in the presence of XPA: implication for damage verification and strand-specific dual incision in nucleotide excision repair

In mammalian cells, nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the major pathway for the removal of bulky DNA adducts. Many of the key NER proteins are members of the XP family (XPA, XPB, etc.), which was named on the basis of its association with the disorder xerodoma pigmentosum. Human replication protein A (RPA), the ubiquitous single-stranded DNA-binding protein, is another of the essential proteins for NER. RPA stimulates the interaction of XPA with damaged DNA by forming an RPA–XPA complex on damaged DNA sites. Binding of RPA to the undamaged DNA strand is most important during NER, because XPA, which directs the excision nucleases XPG and XPF, must bind to the damaged strand. In this study, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to assess the binding of the tandem high affinity DNA-binding domains, RPA-AB, and of the isolated domain RPA-A, to normal DNA and damaged DNA containing the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) lesion. Both RPA-A and RPA-AB were found to bind non- specifically to both strands of normal and CPD- containing DNA duplexes. There were no differences observed when binding to normal DNA duplex was examined in the presence of the minimal DNA-binding domain of XPA (XPA-MBD). However, there is a drastic difference for CPD-damaged DNA duplex as both RPA-A and RPA-AB bind specifically to the undamaged strand. The strand-specific binding of RPA and XPA to the damaged duplex DNA shows that RPA and XPA play crucial roles in damage verification and guiding cleavage of damaged DNA during NER.     

Binding of XPA and RPA to damaged DNA investigated by fluorescence anisotropy

The proteins XPA and RPA are assumed to be involved in primary damage recognition of global genome nucleotide excision repair. XPA as well as RPA have been each reported to specifically bind DNA lesions, and ternary complex formation with damaged DNA has also been shown. We employed fluorescence anisotropy measurements to study the DNA-binding properties of XPA and RPA under true equilibrium conditions using damaged DNA probes carrying a terminal fluorescein modification as a reporter. XPA binds with low affinity and in a strongly salt-dependent manner to DNA containing a 1,3-d(GTG) intrastrand adduct of the anticancer drug cisplatin or a 6-nt mismatch (K(D) = 400 nM) with 3-fold preference for damaged vs undamaged DNA. At near physiological salt conditions binding is very weak (K(D) > 2 microM). RPA binds to damaged DNA probes with dissociation constants in the range of 20 nM and a nearly 15-fold preference over undamaged DNA. The presence of a cisplatin modification weakens the affinity of RPA for single-stranded DNA by more than 1 order of magnitude indicating that binding to the lesion itself is not a driving force in damage recognition. Our fluorescence anisotropy assays also show that the presence of XPA does not enhance the affinity of RPA for damaged DNA although both proteins interact. In contrast, cooperative binding of XPA and RPA is observed in EMSA. Our results point to a damage-sensing function of the XPA-RPA complex with RPA mediating the important DNA contacts.     

DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A. 2. Characterization of DNA binding activity, protein interactions, and activity in DNA replication and repair

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric protein consisting of 70-, 34-, and 14- kDa subunits that is required for many DNA metabolic processes including DNA replication and DNA repair. Using a purified hyperphosphorylated form of RPA protein prepared in vitro, we have addressed the effects of hyperphosphorylation on steady-state and pre-steady-state DNA binding activity, the ability to support DNA repair and replication reactions, and the effect on the interaction with partner proteins. Equilibrium DNA binding activity measured by fluorescence polarization reveals no difference in ssDNA binding to pyrimidine-rich DNA sequences. However, RPA hyperphosphorylation results in a decreased affinity for purine-rich ssDNA and duplex DNA substrates. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis is consistent with the equilibrium DNA binding and demonstrates a contribution from both the k(on) and k(off) to achieve these differences. The hyperphosphorylated form of RPA retains damage-specific DNA binding, and, importantly, the affinity of hyperphosphorylated RPA for damaged duplex DNA is 3-fold greater than the affinity of unmodified RPA for undamaged duplex DNA. The ability of hyperphosphorylated RPA to support DNA repair showed minor differences in the ability to support nucleotide excision repair (NER). Interestingly, under reaction conditions in which RPA is maintained in a hyperphosphorylated form, we also observed inhibition of in vitro DNA replication. Analyses of protein-protein interactions bear out the effects of hyperphosphorylated RPA on DNA metabolic pathways. Specifically, phosphorylation of RPA disrupts the interaction with DNA polymerase alpha but has no significant effect on the interaction with XPA. These results demonstrate that the effects of DNA damage induced hyperphosphorylation of RPA on DNA replication and DNA repair are mediated through alterations in DNA binding activity and protein-protein interactions.     

Order of assembly of human DNA repair excision nuclease.

Human excision nuclease removes DNA damage by concerted dual incisions bracketing the lesion. The dual incisions are accomplished by sequential and partly overlapping actions of six repair factors, RPA, XPA, XPC, TFIIH, XPG, and XPF.ERCC1. Of these, RPA, XPA, and XPC have specific binding affinity for damaged DNA. To learn about the role of these three proteins in damage recognition and the order of assembly of the excision nuclease, we measured the binding affinities of XPA, RPA, and XPC to a DNA fragment containing a single (6-4) photoproduct and determined the rate of damage excision under a variety of reaction conditions. We found that XPC has the highest affinity to DNA and that RPA has the highest selectivity for damaged DNA. Under experimental conditions conducive to binding of either XPA + RPA or XPC to damaged DNA, the rate of damage removal was about 5-fold faster for reactions in which XPA + RPA was the first damage recognition factor presented to DNA compared with reactions in which XPC was the first protein that had the opportunity to bind to DNA. We conclude that RPA and XPA are the initial damage sensing factors of human excision nuclease.     

DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells

For the bulk of mammalian DNA, the core protein factors needed for damage recognition and incision during nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the XPA protein, the heterotrimeric RPA protein, the 6 to 9-subunit TFIIH, the XPC-hHR23B complex, the XPG nuclease, and the ERCC1-XPF nuclease. With varying efficiencies, NER can repair a very wide range of DNA adducts, from bulky helical distortions to subtle modifications on sugar residues. Several of the NER factors have an affinity for damaged DNA. The strongest binding factor appears to be XPC-hHR23B but preferential binding to damage is also a property of XPA, RPA, and components of TFIIH. It appears that in order to be repaired by NER, an adduct in DNA must have two features: it must create a helical distortion, and there must be a change in DNA chemistry. Initial recognition of the distortion is the most likely function for XPC-hHR23B and perhaps XPA and RPA, whereas TFIIH is well-suited to locate the damaged DNA strand by locating altered DNA chemistry that blocks translocation of the XPB and XPD components.     

Replication protein A phosphorylation and the cellular response to DNA damage

Defects in cellular DNA metabolism have a direct role in many human disease processes. Impaired responses to DNA damage and basal DNA repair have been implicated as causal factors in diseases with DNA instability like cancer, Fragile X and Huntington's. Replication protein A (RPA) is essential for multiple processes in DNA metabolism including DNA replication, recombination and DNA repair pathways (including nucleotide excision, base excision and double-strand break repair). RPA is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein composed of subunits of 70-, 32- and 14-kDa. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity and interacts specifically with multiple proteins. Cellular DNA damage causes the N-terminus of the 32-kDa subunit of human RPA to become hyper-phosphorylated. Current data indicates that hyper-phosphorylation causes a change in RPA conformation that down-regulates activity in DNA replication but does not affect DNA repair processes. This suggests that the role of RPA phosphorylation in the cellular response to DNA damage is to help regulate DNA metabolism and promote DNA repair.     

Strand-specific binding of RPA and XPA to damaged duplex DNA

The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is a major pathway used to repair bulky adduct DNA damage. Two proteins, xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA), have been implicated in the role of DNA damage recognition in the NER pathway. The particular manner in which these two damage recognition proteins align themselves with respect to a damaged DNA site was assessed using photoreactive base analogues within specific DNA substrates to allow site-specific cross-linking of the damage recognition proteins. Results of these studies demonstrate that both RPA and XPA are in close proximity to the adduct as measured by cross-linking of each protein directly to the platinum moiety. Additional studies demonstrate that XPA contacts both the damaged and undamaged strands of the duplex DNA. Direct evidence is presented demonstrating preferential binding of RPA to the undamaged strand of a duplex damaged DNA molecule.     

RPA repair recognition of DNA containing pyrimidines bearing bulky adducts

Recognition of new DNA nucleotide excision repair (NER) substrate analogs, 48-mer ddsDNA (damaged double-stranded DNA), by human replication protein A (hRPA) has been analyzed using fluorescence spectroscopy and photoaffinity modification. The aim of the present work was to find quantitative characteristics of RPA-ddsDNA interaction and RPA subunits role in this process. The designed DNA structures bear bulky substituted pyrimidine nitrogen bases at the inner positions of duplex forming DNA chains. The photoreactive 4-azido-2,5-difluoro-3- pyridin-6-yl (FAP) and fluorescent antracenyl, pyrenyl (Antr, Pyr) groups were introduced via different linker fragments into exo-4N of deoxycytidine or 5C of deoxyuridine. J-dU-containing DNA was used as a photoactive model of undamaged DNA strands. The reporter group was a fluorescein residue, introduced into the 5'-phosphate end of one duplex-forming DNA strand. RPA-dsDNA association constants and the molar RPA/dsDNA ratio have been calculated based on fluorescence anisotropy measurements under conditions of a 1:1 RPA/dsDNA molar ratio in complexes. The evident preference for RPA binding to ddsDNA over undamaged dsDNA distinctly depends on the adduct type and varies in the following way: undamaged dsDNA < Antr-dC-ddsDNA < mmdsDNA < FAPdU-, Pyr-dU-ddsDNA < FAP-dC-ddsDNA (K(D) = 68 +/- 1; 25 +/- 6; 13 +/- 1; 8 +/- 2, and 3.5 +/- 0.5 nM correspondingly) but weakly depends on the chain integrity. Interestingly the bulkier lesions not in all cases have a greater effect on RPA affinity to ddsDNA. The experiments on photoaffinity modification demonstrated only p70 of compactly arranged RPA directly interacting with dsDNA. The formation of RPA-ddsDNA covalent adducts was drastically reduced when both strands of DNA duplex contained virtually opposite located FAP-dC and Antr-dC. Thus RPA requires undamaged DNA strand presence for the effective interaction with dsDNA bearing bulky damages and demonstrates the early NER factors characteristic features underlying strand discrimination capacity and poor activity of the NER system toward double damaged DNA.     

Stopped-flow kinetic analysis of replication protein A-binding DNA: damage recognition and affinity for single-stranded DNA reveal differential contributions of k(on) and k(off) rate constants

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric protein required for many DNA metabolic functions, including replication, recombination, and nucleotide excision repair (NER). We report the pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of RPA-binding DNA substrates using a stopped-flow assay to elucidate the kinetics of DNA damage recognition. The bimolecular association rate, k(on), for RPA binding to duplex DNA substrates is greatest for a 1,3d(GXG), intermediate for a 1,2d(GpG) cisplatin-DNA adduct, and least for an undamaged duplex DNA substrate. RPA displays a decreased k(on) and an increased k(off) for a single-stranded DNA substrate containing a single 1,2d(GpG) cisplatin-DNA adduct compared with an undamaged DNA substrate. The k(on) for RPA-binding single-stranded polypyrimidine sequences appears to be diffusion-limited. There is minimal difference in k(on) for varying length DNA substrates; therefore, the difference in equilibrium binding affinity is mainly attributed to the k(off). The k(on) for a purine-rich 30-base DNA is reduced by a factor of 10 compared with a pyrimidine-rich DNA of identical length. These results provide insight into the mechanism of RPA-DNA binding and are consistent with RPA recognition of DNA-damage playing a critical role in NER.     

Strand displacement of double-stranded DNA by triplex-forming antiparallel purine-hairpins

We characterize the binding affinity and the thermodynamics of hybridization of triplex-forming antiparallel purine-hairpins composed of two antiparallel purine domains linked by a loop directed toward single-stranded and double-stranded DNA (ssDNA, dsDNA). Gel retardation assays and melting experiments reveal that a 13-mer purine-hairpin binds specifically and with a K ( d ) of 8 x 10(8) M to polypyrimidine ssDNA to form a triple helical structure. Remarkably, we show that purine-hairpins also bind polypurine/polypyrimidine stretches included in a dsDNA of several hundred bp in length. Binding of purine-hairpins to dsDNA occurs by triplex formation with the polypyrimidine strand, causing displacement of the polypurine strand. Because triplex formation is restricted to polypurine/polypyrimidine stretches of dsDNA, we studied the triplex formation between purine-hairpins and polypyrimidine targets containing purine interruptions. We found that an 11-mer purine-hairpin with an adenine opposite to a guanine interruption in the polypyrimidine track binds to ssDNA and dsDNA, allowing expansion of the possible target sites and increase in the length of purine-hairpins. Thus, when using a 20-mer purine-hairpin targeting an interruption-containing polypyrimidine target, the binding affinity is increased compared to its 13-mer antiparallel purine-hairpin counterpart. Surprisingly, this increase is much more pronounced than that observed for a tail-clamp purine-hairpin extended up to 20 nt in the Watson-Crick domain only. Thus, triplexforming antiparallel purine-hairpins can be a potentially useful strategy for both single-strand and double-strand nucleic acid recognition.     

Stable binding of human XPC complex to irradiated DNA confers strong discrimination for damaged sites

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) of DNA damage requires an efficient means of discrimination between damaged and non-damaged DNA. Cells from humans with xeroderma pigmentosum group C do not perform NER in the bulk of the genome and are corrected by XPC protein, which forms a complex with hHR23B protein. This complex preferentially binds to some types of damaged DNA, but the extent of discrimination in comparison to other NER proteins has not been clear. Recombinant XPC, hHR23B, and XPC-hHR23B complex were purified. In a reconstituted repair system, hHR23B stimulated XPC activity tenfold. Electrophoretic mobility-shift competition measurements revealed a 400-fold preference for binding of XPC-hHR23B to UV damaged over non-damaged DNA. This damage preference is much greater than displayed by the XPA protein. The discrimination power is similar to that determined here in parallel for the XP-E factor UV-DDB, despite the considerably greater molar affinity of UV-DDB for DNA. Binding of XPC-hHR23B to UV damaged DNA was very fast. Damaged DNA-XPC-hHR23B complexes were stable, with half of the complexes remaining four hours after challenge with excess UV-damaged DNA at 30 degrees C. XPC-hHR23B had a higher level of affinity for (6-4) photoproducts than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, and some affinity for DNA treated with cisplatin and alkylating agents. XPC-hHR23B could bind to single-stranded M13 DNA, but only poorly to single-stranded homopolymers. The strong preference of XPC complex for structures in damaged duplex DNA indicates its importance as a primary damage recognition factor in non-transcribed DNA during human NER.     

DNA recognition of a 24-mer peptide derived from RecA protein

A novel 24-residue peptide (L2-G), Ile-Arg-Met-Lys-Ile-Gly-Val-Met-Phe-Gly-Asn-Pro-Glu-Thr-Thr-Thr-Gly-Gly-Asn-Ala-Leu-Lys-Phe-Tyr, derived from RecA can discriminate a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) from a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and a new developed support with this peptide recognizes not dsDNA but ssDNA. The 24-mer peptide with L2 and helix G amino acids of Escherichia coli RecA protein showed the ssDNA binding property with more than 1000 times affinity difference for the dsDNA. However, truncated 15-mer peptide showed no ssDNA binding activity. In the ssDNA binding, L2-G changed its conformation with the perturbation of an alpha-helix structure. The ssDNA binding and the DNA discrimination property of this peptide were due to almost all L2 and helix G amino acids, respectively. This result is useful to design synthetic peptides as functional materials for DNA recognition.     

Replication-mediated disassociation of replication protein A-XPA complex upon DNA damage: implications for RPA handing off

RPA (replication protein A), the eukaryotic ssDNA (single-stranded DNA)-binding protein, participates in most cellular processes in response to genotoxic insults, such as NER (nucleotide excision repair), DNA, DSB (double-strand break) repair and activation of cell cycle checkpoint signalling. RPA interacts with XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum A) and functions in early stage of NER. We have shown that in cells the RPA-XPA complex disassociated upon exposure of cells to high dose of UV irradiation. The dissociation required replication stress and was partially attributed to tRPA hyperphosphorylation. Treatment of cells with CPT (camptothecin) and HU (hydroxyurea), which cause DSB DNA damage and replication fork collapse respectively and also leads to the disruption of RPA-XPA complex. Purified RPA and XPA were unable to form complex in vitro in the presence of ssDNA. We propose that the competition-based RPA switch among different DNA metabolic pathways regulates the dissociation of RPA with XPA in cells after DNA damage. The biological significances of RPA-XPA complex disruption in relation with checkpoint activation, DSB repair and RPA hyperphosphorylation are discussed.     

Double-check probing of DNA bending and unwinding by XPA-RPA: an architectural function in DNA repair.

The multiprotein factor composed of XPA and replication protein A (RPA) is an essential subunit of the mammalian nucleotide excision repair system. Although XPA-RPA has been implicated in damage recognition, its activity in the DNA repair pathway remains controversial. By replacing DNA adducts with mispaired bases or non-hybridizing analogues, we found that the weak preference of XPA and RPA for damaged substrates is entirely mediated by indirect readout of DNA helix conformations. Further screening with artificially distorted substrates revealed that XPA binds most efficiently to rigidly bent duplexes but not to single-stranded DNA. Conversely, RPA recognizes single-stranded sites but not backbone bending. Thus, the association of XPA with RPA generates a double-check sensor that detects, simultaneously, backbone and base pair distortion of DNA. The affinity of XPA for sharply bent duplexes, characteristic of architectural proteins, is not compatible with a direct function during recognition of nucleotide lesions. Instead, XPA in conjunction with RPA may constitute a regulatory factor that monitors DNA bending and unwinding to verify the damage-specific localization of repair complexes or control their correct three-dimensional assembly.