Presynaptic Targeting of ��4��2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Is Regulated by Neurexin-1��

The mechanisms involved in the targeting of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), critical for their functional organization at neuronal synapses, are not well understood. We have identified a novel functional association between α4β2 AChRs and the presynaptic cell adhesion molecule, neurexin-1β. In non-neuronal tsA 201 cells, recombinant neurexin-1β and mature α4β2 AChRs form complexes. α4β2 AChRs and neurexin-1β also coimmunoprecipitate from rat brain lysates. When exogenous α4β2 AChRs and neurexin-1β are coexpressed in hippocampal neurons, they are robustly targeted to hemi-synapses formed between these neurons and cocultured tsA 201 cells expressing neuroligin-1, a postsynaptic binding partner of neurexin-1β. The extent of synaptic targeting is significantly reduced in similar experiments using a mutant neurexin-1β lacking the extracellular domain. Additionally, when α4β2 AChRs, α7 AChRs, and neurexin-1β are coexpressed in the same neuron, only the α4β2 AChR colocalizes with neurexin-1β at presynaptic terminals. Collectively, these data suggest that neurexin-1β targets α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic terminals, which mature by trans-synaptic interactions between neurexins and neuroligins. Interestingly, human neurexin-1 gene dysfunctions have been implicated in nicotine dependence and in autism spectrum disorders. Our results provide novel insights as to possible mechanisms by which dysfunctional neurexins, through downstream effects on α4β2 AChRs, may contribute to the etiology of these neurological disorders.The clustering of ion channels or receptors and precise targeting to pre- and postsynaptic specializations in neurons is critical to efficiently regulate synaptic transmission. Within the central nervous system, neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs)⁵ regulate the release of neurotransmitters at presynaptic sites (1) and mediate fast synaptic transmission at postsynaptic sites of neurons (2). These receptors are part of a family of acetylcholine-gated ion channels that are assembled from various combinations of α2–α10 and β2–β4 subunits (3). AChRs participate in the regulation of locomotion, affect, reward, analgesia, anxiety, learning, and attention (4, 5).The α4β2 subtype is the most abundant AChR receptor expressed in the brain. Multiple lines of evidence support a major role for α4β2 AChRs in nicotine addiction. α4β2 AChRs show high affinity for nicotine (6) and are located on the dopaminergic projections of ventral tegmental area neurons to the medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens (7, 8). Furthermore, β2 AChR subunit knock-out mice lose their sensitivity to nicotine in passive avoidance tasks (9) and show attenuated self-administration of nicotine (10). α4 AChR subunit knock-out mice also exhibit a loss of tonic control of striatal basal dopamine release (11). Finally, experiments with knock-in mice expressing α4β2 AChRs hypersensitive to nicotine demonstrate that α4β2 AChRs indeed mediate the essential features of nicotine addiction including reward, tolerance, and sensitization (12). High resolution ultrastructural studies show that α4 subunit-containing AChRs are clustered at dopaminergic axonal terminals (13), and a sequence motif has been identified within the α4 AChR subunit cytoplasmic domain that is essential for receptor trafficking to axons (14). However, the mechanisms underlying the targeting and clustering of α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic sites in neurons remain elusive.Recently, bi-directional interactions between neurexins and neuroligins have been shown to promote synapse assembly and maturation by fostering pre- and postsynaptic differentiation (reviewed in Refs. 15–17). The neurexins are encoded by three genes corresponding to neurexins I–III (18, 19), each encoding longer α-neurexins and shorter β-neurexins, because of differential promoter use. Neurexins recruit N- and P/Q-type calcium channels via scaffolding proteins, including calmodulin-associated serine/threonine kinase (20), to active zones of presynaptic terminals (21, 22). Recently, α-neurexins were shown to specifically induce GABAergic postsynaptic differentiation (23). Neuroligins, postsynaptic binding partners of neurexins, cluster N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and GABA_A receptors by recruiting the scaffolding proteins PSD-95 (post-synaptic density 95) and gephyrin, respectively (24, 25). Interestingly, neurexins and neuroligins also modulate the postsynaptic clustering of α3-containing AChRs in chick ciliary ganglia (26, 27). In this study, using multiple experimental strategies, we provide evidence for the formation of complexes between neurexin-1β and α4β2 AChRs and a role for neurexin in the targeting of α4β2 AChRs to presynaptic terminals of neurons.     

Core3 O-Glycan Synthase Suppresses Tumor Formation and Metastasis of Prostate Carcinoma PC3 and LNCaP Cells through Down-regulation of ��2��1 Integrin Complex

Although there are numerous reports of carbohydrates enriched in cancer cells, very few studies have addressed the functions of carbohydrates present in normal cells that decrease in cancer cells. It has been reported that core3 O-glycans are synthesized in normal gastrointestinal cells but are down-regulated in cancer cells. To determine the roles of core3 O-glycans, we transfected PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells with β3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-6 (core3 synthase) required to synthesize core3 O-glycans. Both engineered cell lines exhibited reduced migration and invasion through extracellular matrix components compared with mock-transfected cells. Moreover we found that α2β1 integrin acquired core3 O-glycans in cells expressing core3 synthase with decreased maturation of β1 integrin, leading to decreased levels of the α2β1 integrin complex, decreased activation of focal adhesion kinase, and reduced lamellipodia formation. Upon inoculation into the prostate of nude mice, PC3 cells expressing core3 O-glycans produced much smaller tumors without metastasis to the surrounding lymph nodes in contrast to robust tumor formation and metastasis seen in mock-transfected PC3 cells. Similarly LNCaP cells expressing core3 O-glycans barely produced subcutaneous tumors in contrast to robust tumor formation by mock-transfected LNCaP cells. These findings indicate that addition of core3 O-glycans to β1 and α2 integrin subunits in prostate cancer cells suppresses tumor formation and tumor metastasis.Cancer cells often express surface carbohydrates different from normal cells (1). One such change is expression of sialyl Lewis X and Lewis B blood group antigens in cancer cells (2, 3). These structural elements are seen as capping oligosaccharides attached to the underlying glycan backbone where they likely function as ligands for cell adhesion molecules.The structure of underlying glycans also changes during malignant transformation and differentiation. In particular, there are several reports that an increase in the β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl branch in N-glycans synthesized by β1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-V is associated with oncogenic transformation (4–7). Similar structural changes are seen in mucin-type O-glycans, which have N-acetylgalactosamine at the reducing end linked to polypeptide threonine or serine residues. Addition of different carbohydrate residues to N-acetylgalactosamine confers a variety of backbone structures on mucin-type O-glycans; the most abundant of those are classified as core1, core2, core3, and core4 O-glycans (8) (Fig. 1). Among these O-glycans, the synthesis of the core2 branch has been extensively studied particularly because conversion of core1 to core2 O-glycans was observed in T cell activation (9). Expression of core2 branch apparently represents an oncodifferentiation antigen because core2 branched O-glycans are synthesized in early stages of T cell differentiation, down-regulated in mature T cells, and reappear in T cell leukemia and immune deficiencies such as AIDS and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (for a review, see Ref. 10). In addition, overexpression of core2 O-glycans is seen in many cancers, including lung and breast carcinoma cells (11, 12).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Biosynthetic pathways of mucin-type O-glycans. N-Acetylgalactosamine is transferred to a serine or threonine residue in a polypeptide. Resultant GalNAcα1→Ser/Thr is converted by core3 synthase (β3GnT-6) to GlcNAcβ1→3GalNAcα1→Ser/Thr (core3). Core3 is then converted to core4 by C2GnT-2 (C2GnT-M). GalNAcα1→Ser/Thr is also converted to core1, Galβ1→3GalNAcα1→Ser/Thr, by core1 synthase. Core1 is then converted to core2 by C2GnT-1, C2GnT-2, and C2GnT-3.By contrast, core3 and core4 O-glycans are synthesized in normal cells but apparently down-regulated in gastric and colorectal carcinoma (13, 14). Core3 O-glycans are synthesized by core3 synthase (β3GnT-6),² which adds β1,3-linked N-acetylglucosamine to N-acetylgalactosamine at the reducing terminus (15) (Fig. 1). Iwai et al. (16) showed that forced expression of core3 synthase in human fibrosarcoma HT1080 FP-10 cells resulted in significant reduction in the formation of lung tumor foci in mice after intravenous injection of tumor cells through a tail vein. However, the same study did not address whether the expression of core3 influences tumor metastasis because the cancer cells were intravenously injected and no primary tumor was formed to spread into the lung as metastasis in contrast to the other studies (17, 18). Core4 O-glycan is synthesized by addition of β1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine to a core3 acceptor by core2 β1,6-N-acetylglucosamine M type (C2GnT-M) or C2GnT-2 (19, 20) (Fig. 1). Huang et al. (21) reported that C2GnT-M is down-regulated in colonic carcinoma cells and that forced expression of C2GnT-M in HCT116 colonic carcinoma cells significantly decreased cell invasion and subcutaneous tumor formation. How up-regulation of core3 and core4 O-glycans influences the pathophysiology of cells expressing core3 and core4 O-glycans has not been addressed.Cell-extracellular matrix interaction plays an essential role during acquisition of migration and invasive behavior of cancer cells. For example, α2β1 integrin is the major receptor for collagen (22) and most abundantly expressed in prostate cancer cells (23). Glycosylation on integrin is one of the important modulators of integrin functions, and many glycan structures, mainly N-glycans, have been studied. An increase of bisecting GlcNAc structure on α5β1 integrin inhibits the cell spreading and migration (24), and induced β1,6-GlcNAc sugar chains on N-glycans of β1 integrin result in stimulation of cell migration (25). However, it has not been addressed whether changes in O-glycans affect integrin maturation and functions.To determine the role of core3 O-glycans in tumor formation and metastasis, we analyzed PC3 and LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. We found that these cell lines express only small amounts of detectable core3 synthase; thus we transfected the cell lines with core3 synthase. Core3 synthase-transfected PC3 and LNCaP cells expressed increased amounts of core3 O-glycans in α2β1 integrin, showed the reduced maturation of β1 integrin and low levels of α2β1 integrin formation, migrated less efficiently through collagen and other extracellular matrix components, and were less invasive than mock-transfected cells. Moreover those cells exhibited decreased activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) compared with mock-transfected cells. Significantly PC3 cells expressing core3 O-glycans produced almost no primary tumors in the prostate and formed much fewer metastases in the draining lymph nodes than mock-transfected cells. Similarly LNCaP cells expressing core3 O-glycans produced much smaller subcutaneous tumors than mock-transfected LNCaP cells. These findings indicate that addition of core3 O-glycans to the α2β1 integrin leads to decreased cell migration and invasion, resulting in decreased prostate tumor formation and metastasis.     

Expression of Integrin ��v��6 and TGF-�� in Scarless vs Scar-forming Wound Healing

Oral mucosal wounds heal with reduced scar formation compared with skin. The epithelial integrin αvβ6 is induced during wound healing, and it can activate fibrogenic transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) and anti-fibrogenic TGF-β3 that play key roles in scar formation. In this study, expression of β6 integrin and members of the TGF-β pathway were studied in experimental wounds of human gingiva and both gingiva and skin of red Duroc pigs using real-time PCR, gene microarrays, and immunostaining. Similar to human wounds, the expression of β6 integrin was induced in the pig wounds 7 days after wounding and remained upregulated >49 days. The αvβ6 integrin was colocalized with both TGF-β isoforms in the wound epithelium. Significantly higher expression levels of β6 integrin and TGF-β1 were observed in the pig gingival wounds compared with skin. Early gingival wounds also expressed higher levels of TGF-β3 compared with skin. The spatio-temporal colocalization of αvβ6 integrin with TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 in the wound epithelium suggests that αvβ6 integrin may activate both isoforms during wound healing. Prolonged expression of αvβ6 integrin along with TGF-β3 in the gingival wound epithelium may be important in protection of gingiva from scar formation. (J Histochem Cytochem 57:543–557, 2009)     

Endogenous ADP-ribosylation of elongation factor-2 by interleukin-1��

Eukaryotic elongation factor-2 (eEF-2) catalyses the motion of the growing peptide chain relative to the mRNA at the ribosomes during protein synthesis. This highly conserved G-protein is the specific target of two lethal bacterial toxins, Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A and diphtheria toxin. These toxins exert their detrimental action by ADP-ribosylating a biologically unique posttranslationally modified histidine residue (diphthamide(715)) within eEF-2, thus inactivating the enzyme. Diphthamide(715) is also the target of endogenous (mono) ADP-ribosyl transferase activity. In this article, we report the first known activator of endogenous ADP-ribosylation of eEF-2, interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Thereby, systemic inflammatory processes may link to protein synthesis regulation.     

N-Glycosylation of the I-like Domain of ��1 Integrin Is Essential for ��1 Integrin Expression and Biological Function: IDENTIFICATION OF THE MINIMAL N-GLYCOSYLATION REQUIREMENT FOR ��5��1*

N-Glycosylation of integrin α5β1 plays a crucial role in cell spreading, cell migration, ligand binding, and dimer formation, but the detailed mechanisms by which N-glycosylation mediates these functions remain unclear. In a previous study, we showed that three potential N-glycosylation sites (α5S3–5) on the β-propeller of the α5 subunit are essential to the functional expression of the subunit. In particular, site 5 (α5S5) is the most important for its expression on the cell surface. In this study, the function of the N-glycans on the integrin β1 subunit was investigated using sequential site-directed mutagenesis to remove the combined putative N-glycosylation sites. Removal of the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit (i.e. the Δ4-6 mutant) decreased both the level of expression and heterodimeric formation, resulting in inhibition of cell spreading. Interestingly, cell spreading was observed only when the β1 subunit possessed these three N-glycosylation sites (i.e. the S4-6 mutant). Furthermore, the S4-6 mutant could form heterodimers with either α5S3-5 or α5S5 mutant of the α5 subunit. Taken together, the results of the present study reveal for the first time that N-glycosylation of the I-like domain of the β1 subunit is essential to both the heterodimer formation and biological function of the subunit. Moreover, because the α5S3-5/β1S4-6 mutant represents the minimal N-glycosylation required for functional expression of the β1 subunit, it might also be useful for the study of molecular structures.Integrin is a heterodimeric glycoprotein that consists of both an α and a β subunit (1). The interaction between integrin and the extracellular matrix is essential to both physiologic and pathologic events, such as cell migration, development, cell viability, immune homeostasis, and tumorigenesis (2, 3). Among the integrin superfamily, β1 integrin can combine with 12 distinct α subunits (α1–11, αv) to form heterodimers, thereby acquiring a wide variety of ligand specificity (1, 4). Integrins are thought to be regulated by inside-out signaling mechanisms that provoke conformational changes, which modulate the affinity of integrin for the ligand (5). However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that cell-surface carbohydrates mediate a variety of interactions between integrin and its extracellular environment, thereby affecting integrin activity and possibly tumor metastasis as well (6–8).Guo et al. (9) reported that an increase in β1–6-GlcNAc sugar chains on the integrin β1 subunit stimulated cell migration. In addition, elevated sialylation of the β1 subunit, because of Ras-induced STGal-I transferase activity, also induced cell migration (10, 11). Conversely, cell migration and spreading were reduced by the addition of a bisecting GlcNAc, which is a product of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III),² to the α5β1 and α3β1 integrins (12, 13). Alterations of N-glycans on integrins might also regulate their cis interactions with membrane-associated proteins, including the epidermal growth factor receptor, the galectin family, and the tetraspanin family of proteins (14–19).In addition to the positive and negative regulatory effects of N-glycan, several research groups have reported that N-glycans must be present on integrin α5β1 for the αβ heterodimer formation and proper integrin-matrix interactions. Consistent with this hypothesis, in the presence of the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, normal integrin-substrate binding and transport to the cell surface are inhibited (20). Moreover, treatment of purified integrin with N-glycosidase F blocked both the inherent association of the subunits and the interaction between integrin and fibronectin (FN) (21). These results suggest that N-glycosylation is essential to the functional expression of α5β1. However, because integrin α5β1 contains 26 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, 14 in the α subunit and 12 in the β subunit, identification of the sites that are essential to its biological functions is key to understanding the molecular mechanisms by which N-glycans alter integrin function. Recently, our group determined that N-glycosylation of the β-propeller domain on the α5 subunit is essential to both heterodimerization and biological functions of the subunit. Furthermore, we determined that sites 3–5 are the most important sites for α5 subunit-mediated cell spreading and migration on FN (22). The purpose of this study was to clarify the roles of N-glycosylation of the β1 subunit. Therefore, we performed combined substitutions in the putative N-glycosylation sites by replacement of asparagine residues with glutamine residues. We subsequently introduced these mutated genes into β1-deficient epithelial cells (GE11). The results of these mutation experiments revealed that the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit, sites number 4–6 (S4-6), are essential to both heterodimer formation and biological functions, such as cell spreading.     

miRNA-29c Suppresses Lung Cancer Cell Adhesion to Extracellular Matrix and Metastasis by Targeting Integrin β1 and Matrix Metalloproteinase2 (MMP2)

Our pilot study using miRNA arrays found that miRNA-29c (miR-29c) is differentially expressed in the paired low-metastatic lung cancer cell line 95C compared to the high-metastatic lung cancer cell line 95D. Bioinformatics analysis shows that integrin β1 and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) could be important target genes of miR-29c. Therefore, we hypothesized that miR-29c suppresses lung cancer cell adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) and metastasis by targeting integrin β1 and MMP2. The gain-of-function studies that raised miR-29c expression in 95D cells by using its mimics showed reductions in cell proliferation, adhesion to ECM, invasion and migration. In contrasts, loss-of-function studies that reduced miR-29c by using its inhibitor in 95C cells promoted proliferation, adhesion to ECM, invasion and migration. Furthermore, the dual-luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that miR-29c inhibited the expression of the luciferase gene containing the 3′-UTRs of integrin β1 and MMP2 mRNA. Western blotting indicated that miR-29c downregulated the expression of integrin β1 and MMP2 at the protein level. Gelatin zymography analysis further confirmed that miR-29c decreased MMP2 enzyme activity. Nude mice with xenograft models of lung cancer cells confirmed that miR-29c inhibited lung cancer metastasis in vivo, including bone and liver metastasis. Taken together, our results demonstrate that miR-29c serves as a tumor metastasis suppressor, which suppresses lung cancer cell adhesion to ECM and metastasis by directly inhibiting integrin β1 and MMP2 expression and by further reducing MMP2 enzyme activity. The results show that miR-29c may be a novel therapeutic candidate target to slow lung cancer metastasis.     

Modulation of the activity of cytosolic phospholipase A2�� (cPLA2��) by cellular sphingolipids and inhibition of cPLA2�� by sphingomyelin

We examined the effect of the cellular sphingolipid level on the release of arachidonic acid (AA) and activity of cytosolic phospholipase A2α (cPLA2α) using two Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1-derived mutants deficient in sphingolipid synthesis: LY-B cells defective in the LCB1 subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase for de novo synthesis of sphingolipid species, and LY-A cells defective in the ceramide transfer protein CERT for SM synthesis. When LY-B and LY-A cells were cultured in Nutridoma medium and the sphingolipid level was reduced, the release of AA stimulated by the Ca²⁺ ionophore {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A23187","term_id":"833253","term_text":"A23187"}}A23187 increased 2-fold and 1.7-fold, respectively, compared with that from control cells. The enhancement in LY-B cells was decreased by adding sphingosine and treatment with the cPLA2α inhibitor. When CHO cells were treated with an acid sphingomyelinase inhibitor to increase the cellular SM level, the release of AA induced by {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"A23187","term_id":"833253","term_text":"A23187"}}A23187 or PAF was decreased. In vitro studies were then conducted to test whether SM interacts directly with cPLA2α. Phosphatidylcholine vesicles containing SM reduced cPLA2α activity. Furthermore, SM disturbed the binding of cPLA2α to glycerophospholipids. These results suggest that SM at the biomembrane plays important roles in regulating the cPLA2α-dependent release of AA by inhibiting the binding of cPLA2α to glycerophospholipids.     

FAS1 Domain Protein Inhibits VEGF165-Induced Angiogenesis by Targeting the Interaction between VEGFR-2 and αvβ3 Integrin

It is known that VEGF receptors (VEGFR) and integrins interact with each other to regulate angiogenesis. We reported previously that the fasciclin 1 (FAS1) domain-containing protein, TGFBIp/βig-h3 (TGF-β-induced protein) is an angiogenesis regulator that inhibits both endothelial cell migration and growth via αvβ3 integrin. In an attempt to target the interaction between VEGFR-2 and αvβ3 integrin, we determined whether the FAS1 domain region of TGFBIp/βig-h3 (FAS1 domain protein) can block the interaction between the two receptors, leading to the suppression of angiogenesis. In this study, we showed that FAS1 domain protein inhibits VEGF(165)-induced endothelial cell proliferation and migration via αvβ3 integrin, resulting in the inhibition of VEGF(165)-induced angiogenesis. We also defined a molecular mechanism by which FAS1 domain protein blocks the association between αvβ3 integrin and VEGFR-2, showing that it binds to αvβ3 integrin but not to VEGFR-2. Blocking the association of these major angiogenic receptors with FAS1 domain protein inhibits signaling pathways downstream of VEGFR-2. Collectively, our results indicate that FAS1 domain protein, in addition to its inhibitory effect on αvβ3 integrin-mediated angiogenesis, also inhibits VEGF(165)-induced angiogenesis. Thus, FAS1 domain protein can be further developed into a potent anticancer drug that targets two principal angiogenic pathways. Mol Cancer Res; 10(8); 1010-20. ?2012 AACR.     

Extracellular Matrix Lumican Deposited on the Surface of Neutrophils Promotes Migration by Binding to ��2 Integrin

During inflammation, circulating polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) receive signals to cross the endothelial barrier and migrate through the extracellular matrix (ECM) to reach the injured site. Migration requires complex and poorly understood interactions of chemokines, chemokine receptors, ECM molecules, integrins, and other receptors. Here we show that the ECM protein lumican regulates PMN migration through interactions with specific integrin receptors. Lumican-deficient (Lum^−/−) mice manifest connective tissue defects, impaired innate immune response, and poor wound healing with reduced PMN infiltration. Lum^−/− PMNs exhibit poor chemotactic migration that is restored with exogenous recombinant lumican and inhibited by anti-lumican antibody, confirming a role for lumican in PMN migration. Treatment of PMNs with antibodies that block β₂, β₁, and α_M integrin subunits inhibits lumican-mediated migration. Furthermore, immunohistochemical and biochemical approaches indicate binding of lumican to β₂, α_M, and α_L integrin subunits. Thus, lumican may regulate PMN migration mediated by MAC-1 (α_M/β₂) and LFA-1 (α_L/β₂), the two major PMN surface integrins. We detected lumican on the surface of peritoneal PMNs and not bone marrow or peripheral blood PMNs. This suggests that PMNs must acquire lumican during or after crossing the endothelial barrier as they exit circulation. We also found that peritoneal PMNs do not express lumican, whereas endothelial cells do. Taken together these observations suggest a novel endothelial lumican-mediated paracrine regulation of neutrophils early on in their migration path.Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs)³ play a major role in the development of inflammatory responses to host injury and infection. Their functions include destruction of invading bacteria and recruitment of macrophages and lymphocytes to the affected site (1). Circulating PMNs sense injury and pathogen signals, cross the vascular endothelium, and migrate to the target tissue; two series of events control this process. The first leads to the slowing down and adherence of circulating PMNs on the vascular endothelium followed by their transendothelial migration or extravasation and activation (2). The second controls the directional migration of PMNs to the injured site through the endothelial basement membrane, a specialized type of ECM, and subsequently the deeper interstitial ECM, along chemokine and cytokine gradients. Leukocyte-to-leukocyte and leukocyte-to-endothelium interactions are important before extravasation. These are mediated by interactions between selectins and their ligands and by β₂ (MAC-1 and LFA-1) and β₁ (VLA-4–6) integrin interactions with cell adhesion proteins ICAM and PECAM (3). The directional migration of PMNs through the ECM is a complex, multistep process that involves several α and β integrin interactions with ECM proteins. Thus far, a few basement membrane proteins, laminins, entactin, and fibronectin have been identified as specific ligands in regulating migration of PMNs after extravasation (4–6). Additional interstitial ECM proteins and their receptors that modulate PMN migration have yet to be identified. Here we show that the ECM protein lumican is a novel regulator of PMN migration.Lumican is a secreted collagen-binding ECM protein of the corneal, dermal, and tendon stroma, arterial wall, and the intestinal submucosa (7–9). It is a member of the small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans (10); these were initially investigated in the context of binding collagen and regulating tissue structure and biomechanics (11, 12). A body of literature is beginning to indicate that these proteoglycans interact with cytokines, growth factors, and cell surface receptors to modulate cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration (13–16). Lumican and biglycan, another member of this family of proteoglycans, have been recently shown to regulate host response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (17, 18). Thus, lumican-deficient (Lum^−/−) mice are hyporesponsive to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxins, and Lum^−/− macrophages in culture produce lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to LPS (18). Lumican facilitates innate immune response by binding LPS and CD14, the glycerol phosphatidylinositol-linked cell surface adaptor protein that transfers the LPS signal to toll-like receptor 4 (18). In a corneal injury model neutrophil influx is delayed in the Lum^−/− mice (19, 20). Although this may be partly due to impaired innate immune response, it raises the possibility that lumican may have an additional role in neutrophil migration. Here we elucidate a role for lumican in PMN migration. We show that poor chemotactic migration of Lum^−/− PMNs can be rescued by exogenous recombinant lumican (rLum) and blocked specifically with antibodies against lumican, β₂, β₁, and α_M integrins. Our results also show that lumican localizes on the surface of extravasated PMNs through its interactions with β₂ integrins. The likely source of lumican on neutrophils is the vascular endothelium.     

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Regulates Integrin ��v��3 Expression and Autocrine Transforming Growth Factor �� Signaling

Fibrosis is characterized by elevated transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling, resulting in extracellular matrix accumulation and increased PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor) expression. PAI-1 induces the internalization of urokinase plasminogen activator/receptor and integrin αvβ3 from the cell surface. Since increased αvβ3 expression correlates with increased TGFβ signaling, we hypothesized that aberrant PAI-1-mediated αvβ3 endocytosis could initiate an autocrine loop of TGFβ activity. We found that in PAI-1 knock-out (KO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts), αvβ3 endocytosis was reduced by ∼75%, leaving αvβ3 in enlarged focal adhesions, similar to wild type cells transfected with PAI-1 small interfering RNA. TGFβ signaling was significantly enhanced in PAI-1 KO cells, as demonstrated by a 3-fold increase in SMAD2/3-containing nuclei and a 2.9-fold increase in TGFβ activity that correlated with an increase in αvβ3 and TGFβ receptor II expression. As expected, PAI-1 KO cells had unregulated plasmin activity, which was only partially responsible for TGFβ activation, as evidenced by a mere 25% reduction in TGFβ activity when plasmin was inhibited. Treatment of cells with an αvβ3-specific cyclic RGD peptide (GpenGRGD) led to a more profound (59%) TGFβ inhibition; a nonspecific RGD peptide (GRGDNP) inhibited TGFβ by only 23%. Human primary fibroblasts were used to confirm that PAI-1 inhibition and β3 overexpression led to an increase in TGFβ activity. Consistent with a fibrotic phenotype, PAI-1 KO cells were constitutively myofibroblasts that had a 1.6-fold increase in collagen deposition over wild type cells. These data suggest that PAI-1-mediated regulation of αvβ3 integrin is critical for the control of TGFβ signaling and the prevention of fibrotic disease.Fibrotic disorders can result from environmental toxins, persistent infection, autoimmune disease, or mechanical injury, leading to the hardening and scarring of tissues. In fibrotic diseases, such as liver cirrhosis, renal fibrosis, and idiopathic lung fibrosis, or in pathological wound healing, such as hypertrophic scarring, scleroderma, and Dupuytren disease, the persistence of myofibroblasts contributes to disease progression by overproduction of extracellular matrix (ECM)² and by excessive contraction (1–3). A shift in the balance of growth factors and cytokines that promote ECM deposition and proteases that degrade matrix often contributes to fibrotic disease (4, 5). Plasmin, a broad spectrum protease that is generated from plasminogen by uPA, is one of the proteases that degrades matrix and activates growth factors and other proteases (6). Since uPA activity is inhibited by PAI-1, the overexpression of PAI-1 results in matrix accumulation. For this reason, PAI-1 is a key prognostic marker for fibrotic disease. PAI-1 exerts its inhibitory activity on uPA by stimulating the endocytosis of the cell surface uPA·uPAR complex through the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (7). Integrin αvβ3 is also internalized with the uPA·uPAR·low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein complex (8). After endocytosis, uPAR and integrins are recycled back to the cell surface for another round of binding (8, 9). uPAR and αvβ3 promote cellular attachment and spreading, since they are receptors for the extracellular matrix molecule, vitronectin (10). Thus, cycling of the complex is thought to stimulate the attachment and detachment that is necessary for cell migration (8). Consequently, a shift in the expression of any of these components (PAI-1/uPA/uPAR/αvβ3) can result in either aggressive migration, as seen in cancer invasion, or a persistent increase in cell adhesion and cell tension, as seen in myofibroblasts in fibrotic tissue.The family of TGFβ growth factors has been intensively studied for their role in fibrotic wound healing. Up-regulation of TGFβ results in amplified and persistent overproduction of molecules, such as integrins and PAI-1 and other protease inhibitors (e.g. TIMPs) (2, 3). Up-regulated integrins continue the cycle of TGFβ signaling by participating in the sustained activation of TGFβ from its latent form. To date, studies have found that various αv integrins participate in the activation of TGFβ (αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8), but the mechanism differs (11–15). Integrins can serve as docking proteins to localize proteases that cleave and activate latent TGFβ in the ECM, or they can directly activate latent TGFβ in a protease-independent manner. Recently, it was discovered that latent TGFβ is also activated by mechanical stress generated from an integrin-mediated interaction between myofibroblasts and the ECM, primarily involving αvβ5. The mechanical stress promotes a conformational change that activates the latent TGFβ complex (15). αv integrins also modulate TGFβ signaling through the binding of αvβ3 to TGFβ receptor II (TGFβRII) in the presence of TGFβ. This interaction was shown to promote a dramatic increase in the proliferation of lung fibroblasts and induce invasion of epithelial breast cancer cells (16, 17).Our data establish a role for the PAI-1-mediated control of αvβ3 expression and support a significant role for αvβ3 in TGFβ signaling. Using PAI-1 KO cells, we tested the hypothesis that the absence of PAI-1 would result in the accumulation of αvβ3 on the cell surface, since PAI-1 promotes the endocytosis of uPA·uPAR·αvβ3. PAI-1-mediated endocytosis of β3 was significantly reduced in the PAI-1 KO cells. Correspondingly, we report that β3 accumulated at the cell surface in enlarged β3-containing focal adhesions. Thus, we explored whether the accumulation of αvβ3 on the cell surface had fibrogenic effects even in the absence of profibrotic PAI-1. Our results demonstrate dramatically increased TGFβ activity and an increase in collagen expression in PAI-1 KO cells. Together, these findings suggest that PAI-1 modulates β3 expression and localization and, in turn, TGFβ signaling. Our data reveal that maintaining precise levels of PAI-1 is a key to preventing fibrosis. Understanding the consequence of regulating PAI-1 activity is critical in light of the many clinical therapies currently under development that target PAI-1 (18, 19).