The Direct Binding of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) to Integrin ��v��3 Is Involved in IGF-1 Signaling

It has been proposed that ligand occupancy of integrin αvβ3 with extracellular matrix ligands (e.g. vitronectin) plays a critical role in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling. We found that expression of αvβ3 enhanced IGF-1-induced proliferation of Chinese hamster ovary cells in serum-free conditions (in the absence of vitronectin). We hypothesized that the direct integrin binding to IGF-1 may play a role in IGF-1 signaling. We demonstrated that αvβ3 specifically and directly bound to IGF-1 in cell adhesion, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type binding, and surface plasmon resonance studies. We localized the amino acid residues of IGF-1 that are critical for integrin binding by docking simulation and mutagenesis. We found that mutating two Arg residues at positions 36 and 37 in the C-domain of IGF-1 to Glu (the R36E/R37E mutation) effectively reduced integrin binding. Interestingly, although the mutant still bound to IGF1R, it was defective in inducing IGF1R phosphorylation, AKT and ERK1/2 activation, and cell proliferation. Furthermore wild type IGF-1 mediated co-precipitation of αvβ3 and IGF1R, whereas the R36E/R37E mutant did not, suggesting that IGF-1 mediates the interaction between αvβ3 and IGF1R. These results suggest that the direct binding to IGF-1 to integrin αvβ3 plays a role in IGF-1 signaling through ternary complex formation (αvβ3-IGF-IGF1R), and integrin-IGF-1 interaction is a novel target for drug discovery.Integrins are a family of cell adhesion receptors that mediate cell-extracellular matrix (ECM)³ interaction and cell-cell interaction (1). It has been proposed that signaling from inside the cells regulates the ligand binding affinity of integrins (inside-out signaling) (2). Each integrin is a heterodimer containing α and β subunits. At present 18 α and 8 β subunits have been identified that combine to form 24 integrins (3).It has been reported that integrin αvβ3 plays a role in cancer proliferation and invasiveness. High levels of integrin αvβ3 correlate with growth and/or progression of melanoma (4, 5), neuroblastoma (6), breast cancer (7, 8), colon cancer (9), ovarian cancer (10), and cervical cancer (11). Moreover, individuals homozygous for the β3L33P polymorphism that enhances the ligand binding affinity of β3 integrins have an increased risk to develop breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and melanoma (12). However, it remains unclear whether and how increased levels of αvβ3 on tumor cells contribute to cancer development.Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) is a polypeptide hormone (75 kDa) that has a high degree of structural similarity to human proinsulin. IGF-1 acts through binding to the type I IGF receptor (IGF1R), a receptor tyrosine kinase. The IGF1R is a heterotetramer that consists of two α-subunits that contain the ligand-binding domains and two β-subunits that contain the tyrosine kinase activity. After ligand binding, the receptor undergoes a conformational change resulting in the activation of the tyrosine kinase, which results in transphosphorylation of the opposite β-subunit on specific tyrosine residues. These phosphotyrosines then bind to adapter molecules such as Shc and IRS-1. Phosphorylation of these proteins leads to activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways (reviewed in Ref. 13).IGF-1 has been implicated in cancer progression (14). One of the major actions of IGF-1 is to inhibit apoptosis. IGF-1 confers resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. IGF-1 expression levels are increased in breast, lung, prostate, and many other cancers. Several strategies to target IGF-1 signaling have been extensively studied, including small interfering RNA and monoclonal antibodies for IGF1R and kinase inhibitors to inhibit the enzymatic activity of the receptor. The IGF-1 system is a therapeutic target for cancer, and elucidation of the IGF-1 signaling pathway should have a major impact in designing new therapeutic strategies.It has been proposed that ligand occupancy of αvβ3 with ECM ligands such as vitronectin plays a critical role in enhancing IGF-1 signaling (14). It has been reported that inhibiting αvβ3-ECM interaction (“ligand occupancy”) of αvβ3 inhibited IGF-1 actions selectively in cell types that express αvβ3 (14). Inhibiting ligand occupancy of αvβ3 blocked IGF-1-induced cell migration (15), DNA synthesis, IRS-1 phosphorylation, and IGF1R-linked downstream signaling events, such as activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ERK1/2 (16).In the present study, we demonstrated that expression of αvβ3 enhanced proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in the presence of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and in serum-free conditions if IGF-1 was present. This suggests that IGF-1 is involved in enhanced proliferation of αvβ3-expressing cells. We demonstrated that αvβ3 bound to IGF-1 in several different binding assays. We found that two Arg residues at positions 36 and 37 in the C-domain of IGF-1 are critical for integrin binding by docking simulation and mutagenesis. Mutation of these Arg residues to Glu (the R36E/R37E mutation) effectively reduced integrin binding. Interestingly, the R36E/R37E mutant was defective in inducing cell proliferation and IGF-1 intracellular signaling, although it still bound to IGF1R. We demonstrated that wild type IGF-1 mediated co-precipitation of αvβ3 and IGF1R, whereas the R36E/R37E mutant did not, suggesting that IGF-1 mediates the interaction between αvβ3 and IGF1R. These results suggest that the direct binding to IGF-1 plays a role in IGF-1 signaling.     

BRCA1 and Estrogen Receptor α Expression Regulation in Breast Cancer Cells

Molecular Biology - BRCA1 (breast cancer 1) protein is involved in the genome stability maintenance participating in homologous recombination-dependent DNA repair. Disruption of BRCA1 functioning...     

The Asymmetric Binding of PGC-1α to the ERRα and ERRγ Nuclear Receptor Homodimers Involves a Similar Recognition Mechanism

Background

PGC-1α is a crucial regulator of cellular metabolism and energy homeostasis that functionally acts together with the estrogen-related receptors (ERRα and ERRγ) in the regulation of mitochondrial and metabolic gene networks. Dimerization of the ERRs is a pre-requisite for interactions with PGC-1α and other coactivators, eventually leading to transactivation. It was suggested recently (Devarakonda et al) that PGC-1α binds in a strikingly different manner to ERRγ ligand-binding domains (LBDs) compared to its mode of binding to ERRα and other nuclear receptors (NRs), where it interacts directly with the two ERRγ homodimer subunits.

Methods/Principal Findings

Here, we show that PGC-1α receptor interacting domain (RID) binds in an almost identical manner to ERRα and ERRγ homodimers. Microscale thermophoresis demonstrated that the interactions between PGC-1α RID and ERR LBDs involve a single receptor subunit through high-affinity, ERR-specific L3 and low-affinity L2 interactions. NMR studies further defined the limits of PGC-1α RID that interacts with ERRs. Consistent with these findings, the solution structures of PGC-1α/ERRα LBDs and PGC-1α/ERRγ LBDs complexes share an identical architecture with an asymmetric binding of PGC-1α to homodimeric ERR.

Conclusions/Significance

These studies provide the molecular determinants for the specificity of interactions between PGC-1α and the ERRs, whereby negative cooperativity prevails in the binding of the coactivators to these receptors. Our work indicates that allosteric regulation may be a general mechanism controlling the binding of the coactivators to homodimers.     

FRS2 via Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Is Required for Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor ��-mediated Regulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Marker Gene Expression

Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) exhibit phenotypic plasticity and change from a quiescent contractile phenotype to a proliferative synthetic phenotype during physiological arteriogenesis and pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis and restenosis. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB is a potent inducer of the VSMC synthetic phenotype; however, much less is known about the role of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) in this process. Here, we show using signal transduction mutants of FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) expressed in rat VSMC that the adaptor protein FRS2 is essential for FGFR1-mediated phenotypic modulation and down-regulation of VSMC smooth muscle α-actin (SMA) gene expression. In addition, we show that PDGF-BB and FGF2 act synergistically to induce cell proliferation and down-regulate SMA and SM22α in VSMC. Furthermore, we show that PDGF-BB induces tyrosine phosphorylation of FGFR1 and that this phosphorylation is mediated by PDGF receptor-β (PDGFRβ), but not c-Src. We demonstrate that FRS2 co-immunoprecipitates with PDGFRβ in a complex that requires FGFR1 and that both the extracellular and the intracellular domains of FGFR1 are required for association with PDGFRβ, whereas the cytoplasmic domain of FGFR1 is required for FRS2 association with the FGFR1-PDGFRβ complex. Knockdown of FRS2 in VSMC by RNA interference inhibited PDGF-BB-mediated down-regulation of SMA and SM22α without affecting PDGF-BB mediated cell proliferation or ERK activation. Together, these data support the notion that PDGFRβ down-regulates SMA and SM22α through formation of a complex that requires FGFR1 and FRS2 and prove novel insight into VSMC phenotypic plasticity.Phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC)3 is an important step in the development of several pathophysiological processes including atherosclerosis, restenosis, and vascular remodeling (1, 2). During these processes VSMC change from a contractile phenotype to a synthetic phenotype characterized by increased proliferation, migration, increased extracellular matrix production, and decreased expression of contractile proteins, including smooth muscle α-actin (SMA), SM22α, calponin, and myosin heavy chain. Several growth factors including platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), and thrombin have been implicated in the induction of the synthetic phenotype (3). These growth factors bind cell surface receptors and activate intracellular signaling pathways that result in changes in gene expression and cellular phenotype. Understanding the interactions between these pathways may provide insights into mechanisms of phenotypic modulation of VSMC and provide new targets for therapeutic intervention in vascular disease.Experimental evidence using various in vitro and in vivo models points to a role for FGF-FGFR in the phenotypic modulation of VSMC. FGFs and FGFRs are expressed in VSMC and are up-regulated during vascular injury and in atherosclerotic plaque formation (4–6). Balloon injury of rat arteries led to an increase in FGFR expression in VSMC. The up-regulation of FGF and FGFR suggests that they contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular disease. In support of this hypothesis, administration of anti-FGF2 antibodies and FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors results in decreased VSMC proliferation, migration, and attenuated neointimal thickening (7).PDGF-BB binds to PDGFRβ and activates several intracellular signaling pathways including ERK, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (8). Studies have indicated that PDGF-BB induces the release of FGF2 and activation FGFR1, resulting in sustained ERK activation and proliferation of human VSMC (9). When FGFR1 expression was inhibited by RNA interference, PDGF-BB induced transient but not sustained ERK activation.Binding of FGF2 to FGFR1 activates the ERK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathways via the adaptor protein FRS2 (10, 11). Upon FGF2 binding, FGFR1 phosphorylates FRS2 on six tyrosine residues that function as docking sites for the SH2 domain-containing proteins Grb2 and SHP2 (12, 13). Grb2 binds Gab1 leading to activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt, whereas SHP2 activates the Ras-Raf-ERK pathway. FRS2 binds to FGFR1 via a Val-Thr dipeptide in the juxtamembrane region of FGFR1 (14, 15). Deletion of these two amino acids abrogates binding of FRS2 to FGFR1. To determine the role of FRS2 in FGFR1-mediated VSMC phenotypic modulation and to determine the interaction of PDGFRβ with the FGFR1 signaling pathway, we developed a set of FGFR1 signaling pathway deficient mutants and stably expressed them in rat VSMC. In this study we report that PDGFRβ, FGFR1, and FRS2 form a multi-protein complex that is essential for VSMC phenotypic modulation and that stable knockdown of FRS2 inhibits PDGF-BB-mediated down-regulation of VSMC marker gene expression but not PDGF-BB-mediated VSMC proliferation.     

Proline cis/trans-Isomerase Pin1 Regulates Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor �� Activity through the Direct Binding to the Activation Function-1 Domain

The important roles of a nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) are widely accepted in various biological processes as well as metabolic diseases. Despite the worldwide quest for pharmaceutical manipulation of PPARγ activity through the ligand-binding domain, very little information about the activation mechanism of the N-terminal activation function-1 (AF-1) domain. Here, we demonstrate the molecular and structural basis of the phosphorylation-dependent regulation of PPARγ activity by a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase, Pin1. Pin1 interacts with the phosphorylated AF-1 domain, thereby inhibiting the polyubiquitination of PPARγ. The interaction and inhibition are dependent upon the WW domain of Pin1 but are independent of peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans-isomerase activity. Gene knockdown experiments revealed that Pin1 inhibits the PPARγ-dependent gene expression in THP-1 macrophage-like cells. Thus, our results suggest that Pin1 regulates macrophage function through the direct binding to the phosphorylated AF-1 domain of PPARγ.     

Direct Binding and Regulation of RhoA Protein by Cyclic GMP-dependent Protein Kinase Iα

Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) tone is regulated by the state of myosin light chain (MLC) phosphorylation, which is in turn regulated by the balance between MLC kinase and MLC phosphatase (MLCP) activities. RhoA activates Rho kinase, which phosphorylates the regulatory subunit of MLC phosphatase, thereby inhibiting MLC phosphatase activity and increasing contraction and vascular tone. Nitric oxide is an important mediator of VSMC relaxation and vasodilation, which acts by increasing cyclic GMP (cGMP) levels in VSMC, thereby activating cGMP-dependent protein kinase Iα (PKGIα). PKGI is known to phosphorylate Rho kinase, preventing Rho-mediated inhibition of MLC phosphatase, promoting vasorelaxation, although the molecular mechanisms that mediate this are unclear. Here we identify RhoA as a target of activated PKGIα and show further that PKGIα binds directly to RhoA, inhibiting its activation and translocation. In protein pulldown and immunoprecipitation experiments, binding of RhoA and PKGIα was demonstrated via a direct interaction between the amino terminus of RhoA (residues 1–44), containing the switch I domain of RhoA, and the amino terminus of PKGIα (residues 1–59), which includes a leucine zipper heptad repeat motif. Affinity assays using cGMP-immobilized agarose showed that only activated PKGIα binds RhoA, and a leucine zipper mutant PKGIα was unable to bind RhoA even if activated. Furthermore, a catalytically inactive mutant of PKGIα bound RhoA but did not prevent RhoA activation and translocation. Collectively, these results support that RhoA is a PKGIα target and that direct binding of activated PKGIα to RhoA is central to cGMP-mediated inhibition of the VSMC Rho kinase contractile pathway.