Use of covariance analysis for the prediction of structural domain boundaries from multiple protein sequence alignments

Current methods for identification of domains within protein sequences require either structural information or the identification of homologous domain sequences in different sequence contexts. Knowledge of structural domain boundaries is important for fold recognition experiments and structural determination by X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy using the divide-and-conquer approach. Here, a new and conceptually simple method for the identification of structural domain boundaries in multiple protein sequence alignments is presented. Analysis of covariance at positions within the alignment is first used to predict 3D contacts. By the nature of the domain as an independent folding unit, inter-domain predicted contacts are fewer than intra-domain predicted contacts. By analysing all possible domain boundaries and constructing a smoothed profile of predicted contact density (PCD), true structural domain boundaries are predicted as local profile minima associated with low PCD. A training data set is constructed from 52 non-homologous two-domain protein sequences of known 3D structure and used to determine optimal parameters for the profile analysis. The alignments in the training data set contained 48 +/- 17 (mean +/- SD) sequences and lengths of 257 +/- 121 residues. Of the 47 alignments yielding predictions, 35% of true domain boundaries are predicted to within 15 amino acids by the local profile minimum with the lowest profile value. Including predictions from the second- and third-lowest local minima increases the correct domain boundary coverage to 60%, whereas the lowest five local minima cover 79% of correct domain boundaries. Through further profile analysis, criteria are presented which reliably identify subsets of more accurate predictions. Retrospective analysis of CASP3 targets shows predictions of sufficient accuracy to enable dramatically improved fold recognition results. Finally, a prediction is made for geminivirus AL1 protein which is in full agreement with biochemical data, yielding a plausible, novel threading result.     

Multiple sequence alignments as tools for protein structure and function prediction

Multiple sequence alignments have much to offer to the understanding of protein structure, evolution and function. We are developing approaches to use this information in predicting protein-binding specificity, intra-protein and protein-protein interactions, and in reconstructing protein interaction networks.     

Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments

The increasing number and diversity of protein sequence families requires new methods to define and predict details regarding function. Here, we present a method for analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from multiple protein sequence alignments. Given an alignment and set of proteins grouped into sub-types according to some definition of function, such as enzymatic specificity, the method identifies positions that are indicative of functional differences by comparison of sub-type specific sequence profiles, and analysis of positional entropy in the alignment. Alignment positions with significantly high positional relative entropy correlate with those known to be involved in defining sub-types for nucleotidyl cyclases, protein kinases, lactate/malate dehydrogenases and trypsin-like serine proteases. We highlight new positions for these proteins that suggest additional experiments to elucidate the basis of specificity. The method is also able to predict sub-type for unclassified sequences. We assess several variations on a prediction method, and compare them to simple sequence comparisons. For assessment, we remove close homologues to the sequence for which a prediction is to be made (by a sequence identity above a threshold). This simulates situations where a protein is known to belong to a protein family, but is not a close relative of another protein of known sub-type. Considering the four families above, and a sequence identity threshold of 30 %, our best method gives an accuracy of 96 % compared to 80 % obtained for sequence similarity and 74 % for BLAST. We describe the derivation of a set of sub-type groupings derived from an automated parsing of alignments from PFAM and the SWISSPROT database, and use this to perform a large-scale assessment. The best method gives an average accuracy of 94 % compared to 68 % for sequence similarity and 79 % for BLAST. We discuss implications for experimental design, genome annotation and the prediction of protein function and protein intra-residue distances.     

Hierarchical folding of multiple sequence alignments for the prediction of structures and RNA-RNA interactions

Background  

Many regulatory non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) function through complementary binding with mRNAs or other ncRNAs, e.g., microRNAs, snoRNAs and bacterial sRNAs. Predicting these RNA interactions is essential for functional studies of putative ncRNAs or for the design of artificial RNAs. Many ncRNAs show clear signs of undergoing compensating base changes over evolutionary time. Here, we postulate that a non-negligible part of the existing RNA-RNA interactions contain preserved but covarying patterns of interactions.     

Pfam: multiple sequence alignments and HMM-profiles of protein domains.

Pfam contains multiple alignments and hidden Markov model based profiles (HMM-profiles) of complete protein domains. The definition of domain boundaries, family members and alignment is done semi-automatically based on expert knowledge, sequence similarity, other protein family databases and the ability of HMM-profiles to correctly identify and align the members. Release 2.0 of Pfam contains 527 manually verified families which are available for browsing and on-line searching via the World Wide Web in the UK at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Pfam/ and in the US at http://genome.wustl. edu/Pfam/ Pfam 2.0 matches one or more domains in 50% of Swissprot-34 sequences, and 25% of a large sample of predicted proteins from the Caenorhabditis elegans genome.     

PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments

Although multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are essential for a wide range of applications from structure modeling to prediction of functional sites, construction of accurate MSAs for distantly related proteins remains a largely unsolved problem. The rapidly increasing database of spatial structures is a valuable source to improve alignment quality. We explore the use of 3D structural information to guide sequence alignments constructed by our MSA program PROMALS. The resulting tool, PROMALS3D, automatically identifies homologs with known 3D structures for the input sequences, derives structural constraints through structure-based alignments and combines them with sequence constraints to construct consistency-based multiple sequence alignments. The output is a consensus alignment that brings together sequence and structural information about input proteins and their homologs. PROMALS3D can also align sequences of multiple input structures, with the output representing a multiple structure-based alignment refined in combination with sequence constraints. The advantage of PROMALS3D is that it gives researchers an easy way to produce high-quality alignments consistent with both sequences and structures of proteins. PROMALS3D outperforms a number of existing methods for constructing multiple sequence or structural alignments using both reference-dependent and reference-independent evaluation methods.     

Building multiple sequence alignments with a flavor of HSSP alignments

Homology-derived secondary structure of proteins (HSSP) is a well-known database of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) which merges information of protein sequences and their three-dimensional structures. It is available for all proteins whose structure is deposited in the PDB. It is also used by STING and (Java)Protein Dossier to calculate and present relative entropy as a measure of the degree of conservation for each residue of proteins whose structure has been solved and deposited in the PDB. However, if the STING and (Java)Protein Dossier are to provide support for analysis of protein structures modeled in computers or being experimentally solved but not yet deposited in the PDB, then we need a new method for building alignments having a flavor of HSSP alignments (myMSAr). The present study describes a new method and its corresponding databank (SH2QS--database of sequences homologue to the query [structure-having] sequence). Our main interest in making myMSAr was to measure the degree of residue conservation for a given query sequence, regardless of whether it has a corresponding structure deposited in the PDB. In this study, we compare the measurement of residue conservation provided by corresponding alignments produced by HSSP and SH2QS. As a case study, we also present two biologically relevant examples, the first one highlighting the equivalence of analysis of the degree of residue conservation by using HSSP or SH2QS alignments, and the second one presenting the degree of residue conservation for a structure modeled in a computer, which , as a consequence, does not have an alignment reported by HSSP.     

Easy method to predict solvent accessibility from multiple protein sequence alignments

An easy and uncomplicated method to predict the solvent accessibility state of a site in a multiple protein sequence alignment is described. The approach is based on amino acid exchange and compositional preference matrices for each of three accessibility states: buried, exposed, and intermediate. Calculations utilized a modified version of the 3D―ali databank, a collection of multiple sequence alignments anchored through protein tertiary structural superpositions. The technique achieves the same accuracy as much more complex methods and thus provides such advantages as computational affordability, facile updating, and easily understood residue substitution patterns useful to biochemists involved in protein engineering, design, and structural prediction. The program is available from the authors; and, due to its simplicity, the algorithm can be readily implemented on any system. For a given alignment site, a hand calculation can yield a comparative prediction. Proteins 32:190–199, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models

Comparative modeling is the method of choice, whenever applicable, for protein structure prediction, not only because of its higher accuracy compared to alternative methods, but also because it is possible to estimate a priori the quality of the models that it can produce, thereby allowing the usefulness of a model for a given application to be assessed beforehand. By and large, the quality of a comparative model depends on two factors: the extent of structural divergence between the target and the template and the quality of the sequence alignment between the two protein sequences. The latter is usually derived from a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of as many proteins of the family as possible, and its accuracy depends on the number and similarity distribution of the sequences of the protein family. Here we describe a method to evaluate the expected difficulty, and by extension accuracy, of a comparative model on the basis of the MSA used to build it. The parameter that we derive is used to compare the results obtained in the last two editions of the Critical Assessment of Methods for Structure Prediction (CASP) experiment as a function of the difficulty of the modeling exercise. Our analysis demonstrates that the improvement in the scope and quality of comparative models between the two experiments is largely due to the increased number of available protein sequences and to the consequent increased chance that a large and appropriately spaced set of protein sequences homologous to the proteins of interest is available.     

Progressive multiple sequence alignments from triplets

Background  

The quality of progressive sequence alignments strongly depends on the accuracy of the individual pairwise alignment steps since gaps that are introduced at one step cannot be removed at later aggregation steps. Adjacent insertions and deletions necessarily appear in arbitrary order in pairwise alignments and hence form an unavoidable source of errors.     

Gleaning structural and functional information from correlations in protein multiple sequence alignments

1. Download : Download high-res image (307KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

3DCoffee: combining protein sequences and structures within multiple sequence alignments

Most bioinformatics analyses require the assembly of a multiple sequence alignment. It has long been suspected that structural information can help to improve the quality of these alignments, yet the effect of combining sequences and structures has not been evaluated systematically. We developed 3DCoffee, a novel method for combining protein sequences and structures in order to generate high-quality multiple sequence alignments. 3DCoffee is based on TCoffee version 2.00, and uses a mixture of pairwise sequence alignments and pairwise structure comparison methods to generate multiple sequence alignments. We benchmarked 3DCoffee using a subset of HOMSTRAD, the collection of reference structural alignments. We found that combining TCoffee with the threading program Fugue makes it possible to improve the accuracy of our HOMSTRAD dataset by four percentage points when using one structure only per dataset. Using two structures yields an improvement of ten percentage points. The measures carried out on HOM39, a HOMSTRAD subset composed of distantly related sequences, show a linear correlation between multiple sequence alignment accuracy and the ratio of number of provided structure to total number of sequences. Our results suggest that in the case of distantly related sequences, a single structure may not be enough for computing an accurate multiple sequence alignment.     

Identifying subset errors in multiple sequence alignments

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) accuracy is important, but there is no widely accepted method of judging the accuracy that different alignment algorithms give. We present a simple approach to detecting two types of error, namely block shifts and the misplacement of residues within a gap. Given a MSA, subsets of very similar sequences are generated through the use of a redundancy filter, typically using a 70–90% sequence identity cut-off. Subsets thus produced are typically small and degenerate, and errors can be easily detected even by manual examination. The errors, albeit minor, are inevitably associated with gaps in the alignment, and so the procedure is particularly relevant to homology modelling of protein loop regions. The usefulness of the approach is illustrated in the context of the universal but little known [K/R]KLH motif that occurs in intracellular loop 1 of G protein coupled receptors (GPCR); other issues relevant to GPCR modelling are also discussed.     

Evaluation measures of multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are frequently used in the study of families of protein sequences or DNA/RNA sequences. They are a fundamental tool for the understanding of the structure, functionality and, ultimately, the evolution of proteins. A new algorithm, the Circular Sum (CS) method, is presented for formally evaluating the quality of an MSA. It is based on the use of a solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem, which identifies a circular tour through an evolutionary tree connecting the sequences in a protein family. With this approach, the calculation of an evolutionary tree and the errors that it would introduce can be avoided altogether. The algorithm gives an upper bound, the best score that can possibly be achieved by any MSA for a given set of protein sequences. Alternatively, if presented with a specific MSA, the algorithm provides a formal score for the MSA, which serves as an absolute measure of the quality of the MSA. The CS measure yields a direct connection between an MSA and the associated evolutionary tree. The measure can be used as a tool for evaluating different methods for producing MSAs. A brief example of the last application is provided. Because it weights all evolutionary events on a tree identically, but does not require the reconstruction of a tree, the CS algorithm has advantages over the frequently used sum-of-pairs measures for scoring MSAs, which weight some evolutionary events more strongly than others. Compared to other weighted sum-of-pairs measures, it has the advantage that no evolutionary tree must be constructed, because we can find a circular tour without knowing the tree.     

AltAVisT: comparing alternative multiple sequence alignments

We introduce a WWW-based tool that is able to compare two alternative multiple alignments of a given sequence set. Regions where both alignments coincide are color-coded to visualize the local agreement between the two alignments and to identify those regions that can be considered to be reliably aligned. AVAILABILITY: http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/altavist/.