Flexible Estimation of Differences in Treatment-Specific Recurrent Event Means in the Presence of a Terminating Event

Summary .  In this article, we consider the setting where the event of interest can occur repeatedly for the same subject (i.e., a recurrent event; e.g., hospitalization) and may be stopped permanently by a terminating event (e.g., death). Among the different ways to model recurrent/terminal event data, the marginal mean (i.e., averaging over the survival distribution) is of primary interest from a public health or health economics perspective. Often, the difference between treatment-specific recurrent event means will not be constant over time, particularly when treatment-specific differences in survival exist. In such cases, it makes more sense to quantify treatment effect based on the cumulative difference in the recurrent event means, as opposed to the instantaneous difference in the rates. We propose a method that compares treatments by separately estimating the survival probabilities and recurrent event rates given survival, then integrating to get the mean number of events. The proposed method combines an additive model for the conditional recurrent event rate and a proportional hazards model for the terminating event hazard. The treatment effects on survival and on recurrent event rate among survivors are estimated in constructing our measure and explain the mechanism generating the difference under study. The example that motivates this research is the repeated occurrence of hospitalization among kidney transplant recipients, where the effect of expanded criteria donor (ECD) compared to non-ECD kidney transplantation on the mean number of hospitalizations is of interest.     

An estimator for the proportional hazards model with multiple longitudinal covariates measured with error

In many longitudinal studies, it is of interest to characterize the relationship between a time-to-event (e.g. survival) and several time-dependent and time-independent covariates. Time-dependent covariates are generally observed intermittently and with error. For a single time-dependent covariate, a popular approach is to assume a joint longitudinal data-survival model, where the time-dependent covariate follows a linear mixed effects model and the hazard of failure depends on random effects and time-independent covariates via a proportional hazards relationship. Regression calibration and likelihood or Bayesian methods have been advocated for implementation; however, generalization to more than one time-dependent covariate may become prohibitive. For a single time-dependent covariate, Tsiatis and Davidian (2001) have proposed an approach that is easily implemented and does not require an assumption on the distribution of the random effects. This technique may be generalized to multiple, possibly correlated, time-dependent covariates, as we demonstrate. We illustrate the approach via simulation and by application to data from an HIV clinical trial.     

A semiparametric approach for the two-sample comparison of survival times with long-term survivors

In the two-sample comparison of survival times with long-term survivors, the overall difference between the two distributions reflects differences occurring in early follow-up for susceptible subjects and in long-term follow-up for nonsusceptible subjects. In this setting, we propose statistics for testing (i) no overall, (ii) no short-term, and (iii) no long-term difference between the two distributions to be compared. The statistics are derived as follows. A semiparametric model is defined that characterizes a short-term effect and a long-term effect. By approximating this model about no difference in early survival, a time-dependent proportional hazards model is obtained. The statistics are obtained from this working model. The asymptotic distributions of the statistics for testing no overall or no short-term effects are ascertained, while that of the statistic for testing no long-term effect is valid only when the short-term effect is small. Simulation studies investigate the power properties of the proposed tests for different configurations. The results show the interesting behavior of the proposed tests for situations where a short-term effect is expected. An example investigating the impact of progesterone receptors status on local tumor relapse for patients with early breast cancer illustrates the use of the proposed tests.     

Application of the Principal Components Method and the Proportional Hazards Regression Model to Analysis of Survival Data

One of factor analysis techniques, viz. the principal components method, and the proportional hazards regression model (Cox, 1972) are applied in this work to study the significance of various factors characterizing the patient, the disease, and the method of treatment in the survival. The application of these methods to analysis of survival data for cervical cancer patients has shown, in particular, the tumor growth rate to be the crucial factor in distribution of the patients survival time and to be even more important than the therapy characteristics.     

Two‐stage estimation for multivariate recurrent event data with a dependent terminal event

Recurrent event data arise in longitudinal follow‐up studies, where each subject may experience the same type of events repeatedly. The work in this article is motivated by the data from a study of repeated peritonitis for patients on peritoneal dialysis. Due to the aspects of medicine and cost, the peritonitis cases were classified into two types: Gram‐positive and non‐Gram‐positive peritonitis. Further, since the death and hemodialysis therapy preclude the occurrence of recurrent events, we face multivariate recurrent event data with a dependent terminal event. We propose a flexible marginal model, which has three characteristics: first, we assume marginal proportional hazard and proportional rates models for terminal event time and recurrent event processes, respectively; second, the inter‐recurrences dependence and the correlation between the multivariate recurrent event processes and terminal event time are modeled through three multiplicative frailties corresponding to the specified marginal models; third, the rate model with frailties for recurrent events is specified only on the time before the terminal event. We propose a two‐stage estimation procedure for estimating unknown parameters. We also establish the consistency of the two‐stage estimator. Simulation studies show that the proposed approach is appropriate for practical use. The methodology is applied to the peritonitis cohort data that motivated this study.     

Hazard regression for interval-censored data with penalized spline

This article introduces a new approach for estimating the hazard function for possibly interval- and right-censored survival data. We weakly parameterize the log-hazard function with a piecewise-linear spline and provide a smoothed estimate of the hazard function by maximizing the penalized likelihood through a mixed model-based approach. We also provide a method to estimate the amount of smoothing from the data. We illustrate our approach with two well-known interval-censored data sets. Extensive numerical studies are conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the new procedure.