The Hox-gene research programme and the shortcomings of molecular preformationism.

The study of the so-called HOM/Hox genes has provided many important insights on the control, at the molecular level, of developmental processes in a variety of model systems such as the fly and the mouse. Yet, in the specialised literature on the subject abound the claims that such genes, and the products coded by them, are the true morphogens responsible for determining the actual form of a particular organism. According to this view, morphogenesis results from the expression of specific 'master control' genes and thus, organic form is somehow pre-established (i.e., preformed) as an assembly programme encoded within the genome. Or in other words, it is claimed that the complex spatio-temporal order that leads to the achievement and maintenance of organic form is implied in a two-dimensional organisation of the genome. Moreover, some authors have claimed that the success of the Hox-gene research programme strongly suggests that morphological evolution is a direct result of evolution at the genetic level. Hereunder I discuss recent evidence that falsifies the basic preformationist tenets of molecular developmental biology. Thus suggesting that the problem of the origin of organic form is left untouched by the Hox-gene research programme and therefore, there is a need to reconsider alternative approaches, such as the structuralist morphogenetic outlook, that are better suited to eventually explain the origin of organic form.