The structure of ubiquitinated histone H2B.

Ubiquitinated histone H2B (uH2B) has been purified from both calf and pig thymus by exclusion chromatography in 7 M urea. Digestion of uH2B with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease yielded the peptide 114-125 containing the ubiquitin moiety. Further digestion of this peptide with trypsin removed the ubiquitin and three H2B residues from the N-terminus. Edman degradations of both peptides established that ubiquitin is attached to the epsilon-amino group of lysine 120 in both calf and pig uH2B by an iso-peptide bond to the C-terminal glycine 76 of ubiquitin.     

The sites of deposition of newly synthesized histone.

The chromosomal fragments produced by nuclease digestion of freshly replicated chromatin migrate more rapidly relative to bulk chromatin when analyzed in nucleoprotein gels. The cause of the anomalous migration has been studied and the evidence indicates that rather than reflecting a shorter nucleosomal repeat in vivo that it may be a consequence of nucleosome sliding during the digestion itself. The distinct electrophoretic characteristics of nucleosomal material containing newly replicated DNA have enabled us to examine their histone composition by two dimensional electrophoresis. We find that nucleosomes containing new DNA also contain newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. In contrast more than 50% of newly synthesized H2A and H2B, and essentially all of new H1, are deposited at sites on the bulk chromatin distinct from that material containing newly replicated DNA. In addition we show that newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 are bound unusually weakly when they first become associated with the chromatin.     

The metabolism of histone fractions. VI. Differences in the phosphorylation of histone fractions during the cell cycle

Phosphorylation of histone fractions in the presence and absence of DNA synthesis was measured using the new “isoleucine-limiting” method for synchronizing Chinese hamster cells in early G₁-phase. Using preparative electrophoresis, histone f1 phosphorylation was found to be dependent upon cell-cycle position, being absent in G₁-arrested and G₁-traversing cells and active in the S-phase. The absence of f1 phosphorylation in G₁-arrested cells, which are known to exhibit f1 turnover, indicates that f1 phosphorylation is not an obligatory part of the f1 turnover process. In contrast to histone f1, it was found that histone f2a2 phosphorylation is independent of cell-cycle position, occurring with equal magnitude in the G₁-traversing state when DNA synthesis is essentially absent and in the S-phase when DNA synthesis is active. When cells were arrested in the G₁-state by isoleucine deprivation, f2a2 phosphorylation continued to be active, occurring at 56% of the rate observed in the G₁-traversing state. These results indicate that phosphorylation of histone f2a2 is independent of f2a2 synthesis, independent of DNA synthesis, and independent of histone f1 phosphorylation. Because f2a2 is actively phosphorylated in G₁-arrested cells known to be active in the synthesis of various types of RNA (including messenger) as well as in G₁-traversing and S-phase cells, we feel that phosphorylation of histone f2a2 should continue to be considered in models concerning activation of DNA template activity.     

The secondary structure of histone IV and its stability.

The secondary structure within histone IV and its fragments obtained by cyanogen bromide (CNBr) and cleavage at Met 84 has been examined by circular dichroism and spectophotometric pH titration measurements. These studies have confirmed the existence of stable secondary structure within the C-terminal fragment of histone IV (C-peptide which can be perturbed only by 6M urea at pH greater than 8 or 8 M guanidine-HCL. In contrast, the N-terminal fragment (N-peptide) appears to lack significant secondary structure at low ionic strengths but acquires approximately 15% betasheet conformation and 5% alpha-helix upon aggregation at ionic strengths larger than or equal to 0.4. The rates of nitration of the N- and C-peptides by tetranitromethane (TNM) have also been measured as a function of ionic strengths. Under comparable conditions, the rate constant for nitration of the N-peptide was found to be about six times greater than that for the C-peptide, further evidence in support of the presence of stable secondary structure within the C-terminal region of histone IV. After binding these histone IV fragments to DNA, however, the nitration reaction rate constants for the N- and C-peptide in the bound form are found to be 2% and 27% of the corresponding free peptides. Reconstituted nucleohistone IV is about 10% as reactive to TNM as histone IV at comparable ionic strength.     

Histone acetylation in Zea mays.I. Activities of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases

DEAE-Sepharose chromatography of extracts from Zea mays meristematic cells revealed multiple histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase enzyme forms. An improved method for nuclear isolation allowed us to discriminate nuclear and cytoplasmic enzymes. Two nuclear histone acetyltransferases, A1 and A2, a cytoplasmic B-enzyme and two nuclear histone deacetylases, HD1 and HD2, have been identified. The histone specificity of the different enzyme forms has been studied in an in vitro system, using chicken erythrocyte histones as substrate. The cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase B is the predominant enzyme, which acetylates mainly histone H4 and to a lesser extent H2A. The nuclear histone acetyltransferase A1 preferentially acetylates H3 and also H4, whereas enzyme A2 is specific for H3. This substrate specificity was confirmed with homologous Z. mays histones. The two histone deacetylases differ from each other with respect to ionic strength dependence, inhibition by acetate and butyrate, and substrate specificity. The strong inhibitory effect of acetate on histone deacetylases was exploited to distinguish different histone acetyltransferase forms.     

The human histone deacetylase family

Since the identification of the first histone deacetylase (Taunton et al., Science 272, 408-411), several new members have been isolated. They can loosely be separated into entities on the basis of their similarity to various yeast histone deacetylases. The first class is represented by its closeness to the yeast Rpd3-like proteins, and the second most recently discovered class has similarities to yeast Hda1-like proteins. However, due to the fact that several different research groups isolated the Hda1-like histone deacetylases independently, there have been various different nomenclatures used to describe the various members, which can lead to confusion in the interpretation of this family's functions and interactions. With the discovery of another novel murine histone deacetylase, homologous to yeast Sir2, the number of members of this family is set to increase, as 7 human homologues of this gene have been isolated. In the light of these recent discoveries, we have examined the literature data and conducted a database analysis of the isolated histone deacetylases and potential candidates. The results obtained suggest that the number of histone deacetylases within the human genome may be as high as 17 and are discussed in relation to their homology to the yeast histone deacetylases.     

The analysis of histone modifications

The biological function of many proteins is often regulated through posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Frequently different modifications influence each other and lead to an intricate network of interdependent modification patterns that affect protein-protein interactions, enzymatic activities and sub-cellular localizations. One of the best-studied class of proteins that is affected by PTMs and combinations thereof are the histone molecules. Histones are very abundant, small basic proteins that package DNA in the eukaryotic nucleus to form chromatin. The four core-histones are densely modified within their first 20-40 N-terminal amino acids, which are highly evolutionary conserved despite playing no structural role. The modifications are thought to constitute a histone code that is used by the cell to encrypt various chromatin conformations and gene expression states. The analysis of modified histones can be used as a model to dissect complex modification patterns and to investigate their molecular functions. Here we review techniques that have been used to decipher complex histone modification patterns and discuss the implication of these findings for chromatin structure and function.     

The distribution of histone H1 subfractions in chromatin subunits.

Rat liver chromatin was digested with micrococcal nuclease to various extents and fractionated into nucleosomes, di and trimers of nucleosomes on an isokinetic sucrose gradient. In conditions under which degradation of linker DNA within the particles was limited, the electrophoretic analysis of the histone content showed that the overall content of H1 histone increased from nucleosomes to higher order oligomers. Moreover, the histone H1 subfractions were found unevenly distributed among the chromatin subunits, one of them, H1--3 showing most variation. A more regular distribution of these subfractions was found in subunits obtained from a more extended digestion level of chromatin. It is suggested that the H1 subfractions differ in the protection they confer upon DNA.