Response of cyclic and post-partum suckled cows to injections of synthetic LH-RH.

Doses of 125, 250 or 500 micrograms LH-RH were injected i.m. into suckled beef cows on approximately Day 11 of an oestrous cycle synchronized by prostaglandin treatment. There was a positive linear relationship between dose of LH-RH and the area under the measured LH peak. Administration of 500 micrograms LH-RH as a single injection to suckled cows 13-32 days post partum resulted in LH release but failed to induce normal ovarian activity. A small transient rise in plasma progesterone for 6--9 days occurred at the expected time after injection in 50% of animals. Administration of 500 micrograms LH-RH to suckled beef cows approximately 20--30 days post partum and a second injection approximately 10 days later at the time when the resulting transient rise in plasma progesterone had returned to basal values induced normal cyclic activity (as shown by progesterone concentrations and observed oestrus) at 35 days compared with 70 days for untreated controls. Pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH, as assessed by LH levels, was found to increase up to 20 days post partum.     

Prolactin and LH release in response to LH-RH and TRH in ewes during dioestrus, pregnancy and post partum

With advancing pregnancy in the ewe there was a marked decline in plasma LH concentrations and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness (integrated LH release) and a marked increase in plasma prolactin values and pituitary TRH responsiveness (integrated prolactin release). In lactating ewes plasma LH levels and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness had returned to values found in the luteal phase of the normal cycle by 21 days post partum, whereas at 42 days post partum prolactin levels were still high. No interaction between TRH and LH-RH on prolactin and LH release in dioestrous ewes was detected. In non-pregnant ewes plasma prolactin levels were significantly higher in June than in January but TRH responsiveness was similar. It is concluded that, in sheep, pituitary LH secretion recovers more rapidly from the chronic negative feedback effect of oestrogens and progesterone in pregnancy than prolactin secretion recovers from the chronic positive feedback effects of oestrogens. This finding may be a contributory factor in the resistance to resumption of breeding activity.     

Comparison of mammalian luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH), and of an analog (ICI 118630), on luteinizing hormone and ovarian steroid (progesterone, oestradiol) secretions in laying hens. (Gallus domesticus)

This experiment was conducted to compare the luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P4) and oestradiol (E2) release in response to injections of various doses of synthetic mammalian luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) and of an LH-RH agonist, ICI 118630, administered to laying hens 4 to 9 hours after a mid-sequence ovulation. Plasma LH increased significantly within 10 minutes of injection of either compound whereas any increases in plasma steroid concentrations were discerned later, at approximately minutes post-injection. No dose-response relationship was found for either compound with respect to LH release, but ICI 118630 appeared more potent than LH-RH. This analog also produced a greater mean incremental rise in plasma progesterone, but not oestradiol, than LH-RH, and this was found in animals injected at a time when the largest ovarian follicle was not mature. These result suggest that ICI 118630 is a more potent releasing hormone in the hen at the level of the pituitary, and that it may have a stimulating effect on ovarian progesterone secretion.     

Serum luteinizing hormone and ovulatory response to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in the estrous and anestrous domestic cat.

A heterologous double antibody radioimmunoassay was developed to measure changes in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations in estrous and anestrous queens (female domestic cats), following a single injection of varying doses (0--25 microgram) of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH). No increase in serum LH was detected in any of the estrous or anestrous queens following a single saline injection. Treatment with LH-RH resulted in a sharp increase in serum LH concentration in both estrous and anestrous queens. Ovulations as observed by the presence of corpora lutea at laparoscopy occurred in none of four, one of four, two of four and four of four estrous queens receiving 0, 5, 10 or 25 microgram of LH-RH, respectively. Mean serum LH concentration of the ovulating queens was maintained at a higher level and did not return to basal level at the same time as that of nonovulating queens. The data show that: LH-RH can cause release of LH in both estrous and anestrous queens and induce ovulation in the estrous cat; the magnitude of LH response is influenced by the stage of the reproductive cycle; and the duration during which LH is maintained above basal level may play a significant role in ovulation induction in this coitus-induced ovulatory species.     

Differential effects of LH-RH immunoneutralization on LH and FSH secretion in the ewe

Neutralization of LH-RH by injection of an ovine antiserum to LH-RH in ewes during the late follicular phase of the oestrous cycle resulted in an immediate blockade of pulsatile secretion of LH. Plasma concentrations of FSH gradually rose in the antiserum-treated ewes during the 36-h study period but levels declined in control ewes. These results show that, in the ewe, pulsatile LH secretion is dependent on LH-RH from the hypothalamus, while FSH is largely unresponsive to short-term reduction of LH-RH stimulation. Since reduction in LH secretion is likely to reduce ovarian function, the changes in FSH secretion may be attributed to the removal of a negative feedback influence of an ovarian factor, perhaps oestradiol, on FSH secretion.     

Direct pituitary effects of estradiol and progesterone on luteinizing hormone release, stores, and subunit messenger ribonucleic acids

To determine the direct, chronic actions of progesterone (P4) and estrogen (estradiol, E2) on anterior pituitary synthesis and release of LH, 24 western range ewes underwent hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD) and ovariectomy (OVX) during the breeding season and were pulsed with exogenous GnRH with or without steroid replacement. Sequential blood samples were collected before infusion of GnRH and on Days 7 and 14 of GnRH infusion. Silastic capsules of P4 and/or E2 were implanted s.c. on Day 7 and remained in place throughout the experiment. Control ewes received only GnRH infusion. Blood sampling was centered around three exogenous GnRH pulses. After the final blood sampling, pituitaries were collected and stored at -70 degrees C. Concentrations of LH in serum and pituitaries were determined by RIA. Relative concentrations of LH subunit mRNAs were determined by Fast Blot analysis. Simultaneous implantation of P4 and E2 lowered LH pulse amplitude 70% and mean serum levels 30% compared with controls. Neither steroid alone affected LH release. E2 alone or in combination with P4 lowered LH-beta subunit mRNA concentrations 40% compared with controls while alpha-subunit levels were unchanged. Only E2 alone altered the pituitary content of LH, causing a 60% decrease. We conclude that the combination of P4 and E2 is necessary for inhibition of GnRH-stimulated LH secretion. E2 inhibits GnRH-stimulated LH-beta subunit mRNA concentrations but does not affect alpha-subunit mRNA concentrations. The control of pituitary LH content by P4 and E2 is the result of changes in both LH-beta subunit mRNA concentrations and LH secretion.     

Effects of prostaglandin E1 or E2 (PGE1; PGE2) on luteal function and binding of luteinizing hormone in nonpregnant ewes

Two studies were conducted to determine the effects of PGE1 or PGE2 on luteal function and binding of luteinizing hormone (LH) to luteal cell membranes in nonpregnant ewes. In Study I, ewes (n=5 per group) received an injection of vehicle (VEH) or 333 micrograms of PGE1 or PGE2 into the tissue surrounding the ovarian vascular pedicle (intrapedicle) on day 7 postestrus. Systemic progesterone concentrations of PGE1-treated ewes were greater (P less than 0.01) than those of VEH-treated ewes at 24 and 48 hr after injection. For PGE2-treated ewes, progesterone concentrations were greater (P less than 0.01) than for VEH-treated ewes only at 24 hr. Neither PGE1 nor PGE2 affected luteal weights or LH binding capacity at 48 hr. Treatment with PGE1, however, increased (P less than 0.10) endogenously bound LH at this time. In Study II, ewes (n=5 per group) received an intrapedicle injection of VEH, or 10 mg of PGE1 or PGE2 on day 8 postestrus. Systemic progesterone concentrations in PGE1-treated ewes were less (P less than 0.01) than for VEH-treated ewes at 24 hr, but by 72 hr were not different from those of VEH-treated ewes. For PGE2-treated ewes, systemic progesterone declined steadily to reach low values by 72 hr. Prostaglandin E2 had no effect on luteal binding of LH at 72 hr, whereas PGE1 increased (P less than 0.05) LH binding capacity and endogenously bound LH. Although PGE2 had no apparent affect on luteal binding of LH in these studies, PGE1 may enhance the function of ovine corpora lutea by stimulating an increase in their binding of LH and capacity to bind LH when the CL receives a luteolytic signal.     

Luteinizing hormone (LH) release after single injections of a synthetic LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH) in the ewe at three different reproductive stages and comparison with natural LH release at oestrus

The possibility was investigated of using single i.v. injections of a synthetic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) to manipulate the reproductive pattern of the ewe.Single i.v. injections of 150 μg synthetic LH-RH were given on Day 12 of the oestrous cycle, during seasonal anoestrus and on Day 16 $\text{post}$-$\text{partum}$ in ewes which lambed during the breeding season. Blood samples were obtained at 5-, 10- or 15-minute intervals for 1 hour before and for 3 hours after treatment. Plasma LH concentrations were measured using a specific double antibody radioimmunoassay, the development of which is described. Laparotomy was performed on each animal 2–3 days after treatment.The treatment induced LH peaks in all animals and ovulation in the majority. There was no significant difference between the groups in the LH response. The LH release was, however, much less than that found in untreated ewes sampled every 15 minutes for 18 hours during oestrus.     

The effects of injecting [D-Ser(But)6] Des Gly-NH2(10) luteinizing hormone releasing hormone ethylamide in early, mid and late seasonal anoestrus on gonadotrophin secretion and luteal function in the ewe

The ability of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogue [D-Ser(Bu(t))(6)] Des-Gly-NH(2)(10) LH-RH ethylamide to stimulate the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and to induce ovulation and luteal function in seasonally anoestrous ewes was investigated by injecting the analogue at three stages of the anoestrus (day 118, day 182 and day 235 of the year). After injection on day 118, eight of nine ewes ovulated and all of the former secreted progesterone during the subsequent 20 days. After injection on day 182, six of the nine ewes ovulated, of which none showed luteal function. Only two of the nine ewes were not already secreting progesterone on day 235. Both of these responded to the analogue by secreting normal luteal levels of progesterone. The mean LH peak heights in response to injection at the three stages showed no significant differences from one another. The mean FSH peak heightafter injection on day 182 was significantly lower than the mean FSH peak height associated with the other two challenges (P < 0.05). On day 116 of the following year, 20 ewes were treated with the analogue as before. The high progesterone levels confirmed the results of the day 118 challenge in the previous year. However, none of the ewes conceived when inseminated artificially 24 and 36 hours after analogue treatment.     

Plasma progesterone and LH concentrations in ewes after injection of an analogue of prostaglandin F-2alpha

Plasma progesterone and LH concentrations were monitored throughout a natural oestrous cycle in 12 Clun Forest ewes and compared to those following treatment with a single i.m. injection of 100 microng ICI 80,996, an analogoue of prostaglandin F-2alpha, given during the luteal phase of the cycle. After injection of the analogue there was a high degree of synchrony in the return of oestrus (440 +/- 1-9 h; mean +/- S.E.M.) and the timing of the LH peak (48-5 +/- 2-0 h) from injection. There were no significant differences in the plasma progesterone concentrations or in the height and duration of the preovulatory LH peak between control and treatment cycles. The technique offers the possibility of controlled ovulation in the ewe.     

Evidence for a direct negative effect of estradiol at the level of the pituitary gland in sheep

The purpose of this experiment was to determine if pituitary stores of LH could be replenished by administration of GnRH when circulating concentrations of both progesterone and estradiol-17 beta (estradiol) were present at levels observed during late gestation. Ten ovariectomized (OVX) ewes were administered estradiol and progesterone via Silastic implants for 69 days. One group of 5 steroid-treated OVX ewes was given GnRH for an additional 42 days (250 ng once every 4 h). Steroid treatment alone reduced (p less than 0.01) the amount of LH in the anterior pituitary gland by 77%. Pulsatile administration of GnRH to steroid-treated ewes resulted in a further decrease (p less than 0.01) in pituitary content of LH. Compared to the OVX ewes, concentrations of mRNAs for alpha- and LH beta-subunits were depressed (p less than 0.01) in all steroid-treated ewes, whether or not they received GnRH. The ability of the dosage of GnRH used to induce release of LH was examined by collecting blood samples for analysis of LH at 15 days and 42 days after GnRH treatment was initiated. Two of 5 and 3 of 5 steroid-treated ewes that received pulses of GnRH responded with increased serum concentrations of LH after GnRH administration during the first and second bleedings, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hypersensitivity of the human gonadotrophs to the repeated administration of small doses of LH-RH.

The functional capacity of the gonadotrophs was assessed by repeated stimulation with small doses of LH-RH (5 microgram intravenously at 2-hour intervals for 3 injections) in normal women during the early and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. The results were compared to those obtained when a single dose (100 microgram) of the neurohormone was administered. During the early follicular phase, the release of LH and FSH remained about equal after the 3 successive injections of the small and after the large dose of LH-RH. During the late follicular phase, the release of LH and fsh increased progressively after the repeated administration of the 5 microgram of the neurohormone while the large dose induced a more pronounced and a more sustained pituitary response. This hypersensitivity of the gonadotrophs is observed when the E2 concentrations are higher than in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.     

Effect of steroids in combination with LH-RH on the release of LH and FSH in LH-RH-primed immature male rat.

LH and FSH release of immature male rats was remarkedably enhanced by LH-RH if primed with LH-RH one hour before. The effect of exogenous steroids on the action of the second LH-RH was investigated. C-18, C-19 and C-21 steroids in different doses were tested. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein immediately before and 30 min after the second LH-RH injection. Serum LH and FSH were determined by respective radioimmunoassays. The concomitant increase of LH and FSH was not induced by all the steroids administered iv. Estrone or 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone suppressed LH and FSH release. Estradiol-17beta preferentially suppressed LH release. Cortisone, progesterone or dehydroepiandrosterone significantly facilitated FSH release, whiel 20alpha-dihydroprogesterone or 20beta-dihydroprogesterone selectively promoted LH release. The sc injection of most steroids dissolved in oil tended to augment the acute release of LH but not FSH. 20alpha-Dihydroprogesterone was particularly potent in this concern. Dehydroepiandrosterone or androstenedione was effective in maintaining FSH release for a longer period. These data revealed that potentiated LH and FSH release induced by the second LH-RH was readily modified by steroids administered simultaneously.     

Effect of active immunisation of ewes against synthetic luteinising hormone releasing hormone.

At the start of the breeding season 13 intact and four ovariectomised ewes were immunised against LH-RH which was rendered immunogenic by conjugation to bovine serum albumin using carbodiimide. The immunogen was emulsified with Freund's complete adjuvant prior to multi-site intradermal injection into a shaved area on the back of each animal. All the ewes were boosted using an identical procedure six and twelve weeks later. LH-RH antibody titres were monitored from weekly blood samples. Oestrous cycles were shown to stop in all but one of the intact ewes after anti-LH-RH titres had developed, but before the seasonal anoestrus. Laparoscopy of the ewes at this time showed that the ovaries and uteri were in various stages of regression. Plasma gonadotrophin levels of ovariectomised ewes fell significantly after immunisation and in intact immunised ewes ovariectomy failed to result in any increase in plasma gonadotrophins. Injection of 150μg synthetic Lh-RH or 6μg of an immunologically distinct analogue of LH-RH failed to induce LH or FSH responses approaching those previously demonstrated with identical doses in non-immunised anoestrous ewes. These results suggest that immunisation against LH-RH could provide an alternative to ovariectomy for the suppression of unwanted oestrous symptoms and ovulation but that reversal of the effects of immunisation might be difficult to achieve routinely.     

Progesterone blockade of the positive feedback effects of 17β oestradiol in the ewe

Ovariectomized ewes (n = 24) were treated with implants that resulted in circulating concentrations of progesterone and 17β-oestradiol similar to those seen in intact ewes in the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle. Progesterone implants were left in for 10 days, and 17β-oestradiol implants for 14 days. Twelve of these ewes received daily injections of 17β-oestradiol in oil (i.m.) at doses sufficient to cause a surge release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the absence of progesterone. The other 12 ewes were treated daily with vehicle (oil). Following progesterone withdrawal on Day 10, each group of 12 ewes was divided into three subgroups. Ewes in each subgroup of the groups treated daily with 17β-oestradiol or vehicle, received an injection of either 17β-oestradiol (oil i.m.), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) (saline, i.v.) or vehicle, 24 h after progesterone withdrawal. Following progesterone withdrawal, no LH surge was detected in ewes treated with vehicle. Surge secretion of LH was detected in ewes of all other groups. The data suggested that in progesterone-treated ewes, daily exposure to stimulatory doses of 17β-oestradiol did not desensitize the hypothalamic pituitary axis to the positive feedback effects of 17β-oestradiol. Daily exposure to 17β-oestradiol did not suppress pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. It was concluded that circulating concentrations of progesterone, similar to those seen during the luteal phase of an oestrous cycle in intact ewes, may prevent all necessary components of the LH surge secretory mechanism from responding to 17β-oestradiol.     

Plasma LH concentrations after single or double injections of synthetic LH-RH in dairy cows.

Milked Friesian dairy cows were given 1 or 2 i.v. injections of synthetic LH-RH. The second of 2 injections of LH-RH given 1.5 h apart induced a significantly greater release of LH than did the first. The response to this injection was also significantly greater than that caused by injections given 6 h apart. There was no significant difference between the LH responses to the two injections given 6 h apart. The total LH release produced by the two injections of 100 microgram synthetic LH-RH given 1.5 h apart was significantly greater than that produced by single injection of 200 microgram synthetic LH-RH. It is concluded that there is a short-term increase in the responsiveness of the bovine pituitary gland to LH-RH after an initial LH-RH stimulus.     

Ovarian steroid hormone involvement in endogenous opioid modulation of LH secretion in mature ewes during the breeding and non-breeding seasons

The opioid antagonist WIN-44441-3 (WIN-3, Sterling-Winthrop) caused significant increases in LH secretion in ovariectomized ewes treated with progesterone but not in ovariectomized animals treated with oestradiol-17 beta. In the non-breeding season, plasma LH concentrations in ovariectomized ewes without steroid therapy, given oestradiol-17 beta or oestradiol-17 beta and progesterone together were not affected by treatment with WIN-3 on Day 6 after ovariectomy (there was a significant increase in LH as a result of WIN-3 treatment 13 days after ovariectomy in sheep given no steroid therapy). However, WIN-3 treatment of ovariectomized sheep given progesterone resulted in a significant increase in plasma LH. WIN-3 was ineffective when given to intact ewes treated with progesterone during the non-breeding season. With ovariectomized sheep during the breeding season there was again no response to WIN-3 at 6 days after ovariectomy in sheep given oestradiol-17 beta, but significant LH elevations in animals given no steroid, those given progesterone and those given progesterone + oestradiol-17 beta. The lack of an LH response to WIN-3 in ovariectomized sheep treated with oestradiol-17 beta did not result from a reduced pituitary response to GnRH since such animals responded normally to exogenous GnRH treatment. Overall, these results are consistent with the idea that, irrespective of the time of year, progesterone exerts negative feedback upon LH release at least in part through an opioidergic mechanism, whereas oestradiol-17 beta exerts negative feedback through steps unlikely to involve opioids. Progesterone can override the effect of oestradiol-17 beta during the breeding season only. Further, there appears to be a steroid-independent opioid involvement in LH suppression, operating at both times of year.     

Independence of progesterone blockade of the luteinizing hormone surge in ewes from opioid activity at naloxone-sensitive receptors.

Fifteen ovariectomized ewes were treated with implants (s.c.) creating circulating luteal progesterone concentrations of 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 serum. Ten days later, progesterone implants were removed from five ewes which were then infused with saline for 64 h (0.154 mol NaCl l-1, 20 ml h-1, i.v.). Ewes with progesterone implants remaining were infused with saline (n = 5) or naloxone (0.5 mg kg-1 h-1, n = 5) in saline for 64 h. At 36 h of infusion, all ewes were injected with oestradiol (20 micrograms in 1 ml groundnut oil, i.m.). During the first 36 h of infusion, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were similar in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal and ewes infused with naloxone, but with progesterone implants remaining (1.23 +/- 0.11 and 1.28 +/- 0.23 ng ml-1 serum, respectively, mean +/- SEM, P greater than 0.05). These values exceeded circulating LH concentrations during the first 36 h of saline infusion of ewes with progesterone implants remaining (0.59 +/- 0.09 ng ml-1 serum, P less than 0.05). The data suggested that progesterone suppression of tonic LH secretion, before oestradiol injection, was completely antagonized by naloxone. After oestradiol injection, circulating LH concentrations decreased for about 10 h in ewes of all groups. A surge in circulating LH concentrations peaked 24 h after oestradiol injection in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal (8.16 +/- 3.18 ng LH ml-1 serum).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effects of gonadectomy and oestradiol-17 beta on pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH in the adult male marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Exogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) administered in a wide range of doses (0.2-25 micrograms) to intact male marmoset monkeys induced a marked increased in plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. Maximum LH concentrations achieved after injection of LH-RH occurred progressively later as the dosage increased. Bilateral orchidectomy sigificantly enhanced pituitary responsiveness to a standard dose (2.0 microgram) of LH-RH, whereas the introduction of oestradiol-17 beta implants effectively inhibited the responses. LH-RH-induced LH release after gonadectomy (with and without oestradiol-17 beta treatment) was similar in males and females. The use of marmosets for appropriate investigation into the physiological role of LH-RH in controlling LH secretion in primates is proposed.     

LH release and luteal function in post-partum acyclic ewes after the pulsatile administration of LH-RH

The administration of LH-RH in a pulsatile regimen (100 ng i.v./h for 48 h) to acyclic ewes 26-30 days post partum increased plasma LH concentrations, and both the frequency and amplitude of plasma LH pulses. In 12/14 ewes these increases were followed by plasma LH surges similar to the preovulatory surges observed in 10 control cyclic ewes. Subsequent luteal function in the post-partum ewes was deficient. Plasma progesterone was detected in 7/12 post-partum ewes showing plasma LH surges. The concentrations were lower (1.3 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) and detected for shorter periods (3-10 days) than in cyclic ewes (2.4 +/- 0.2 ng/ml, 12/15 days). In the post-partum ewes the increases in plasma LH concentrations before the LH surge were higher but of shorter duration than in the cyclic ewes. The inadequate luteal function in the post-partum ewes could therefore have been due to inappropriate LH stimulation of the ovary before the LH surge.