The activation of a neuralizing factor in the neural plate is correlated with its homoiogenetic-inducing activity

Summary Neural plates which are induced in the dorsal ectoderm of Triturus by the underlying mesoderm acquire, in turn, neural-inducing activity. This process is correlated with the appearance of neural-inducing activity in the microsomal fraction of the neural plate homogenate. The high-speed supernatant also acquires inducing activity after neural induction, but to a lesser extent. The experiments suggest that a masked neuralizing factor, which is already present in the ectoderm, is in part activated and exported from the inducing neural plate cells.     

Homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus

Neural induction is known to involve an interaction of ectoderm with dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation, but several kinds of studies have argued that competent ectoderm can also be neutralized via an interaction with previously neuralized tissue, a process termed homeogenetic neural induction. Although homeogenetic neural induction has been proposed to play an important role in the normal induction of neural tissue, this process has not been subjected to detailed study using tissue recombinants and molecular markers. We have examined the question of homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus embryos, both in transplant and recombinant experiments, using the expression of two neural antigens to assay the response. When ectoderm that is competent to be neuralized is transplanted to the region adjacent to the neural plate of early neurula embryos, it forms neural tissue, as assayed by staining with antibodies against the neural cell adhesion molecule, N-CAM. Transplants to the ventral region, far from the neural plate, do not express N-CAM, indicating that neuralization is not occurring as a result of the transplantation procedure itself. Because this response might be occurring as a result of interactions of ectoderm with either adjacent neural plate tissue, or with underlying dorsolateral mesoderm, recombinant experiments were performed to determine the source of the neuralizing signal. Ectoderm cultured in combination with neural plate tissue alone expresses neural markers, while ectoderm cultured in combination with dorsolateral mesoderm does not. We conclude that neural tissue can homeogenetically induce competent ectoderm to form neural tissue and argue that this induction occurs via planar signaling within the ectoderm, a mechanism that, in normal development, may be involved in interactions within presumptive neural ectoderm or in specifying structures that lie near the neural plate.     

Hensen's node induces neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Implications for the action of the organizer in neural induction.

The development of the vertebrate nervous system is initiated in amphibia by inductive interactions between ectoderm and a region of the embryo called the organizer. The organizer tissue in the dorsal lip of the blastopore of Xenopus and Hensen's node in chick embryos have similar neural inducing properties when transplanted into ectopic sites in their respective embryos. To begin to determine the nature of the inducing signals of the organizer and whether they are conserved across species we have examined the ability of Hensen's node to induce neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. We show that Hensen's node induces large amounts of neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Neural induction proceeds in the absence of mesodermal differentiation and is accompanied by tissue movements which may reflect notoplate induction. The competence of the ectoderm to respond to Hensen's node extends much later in development than that to activin-A or to induction by vegetal cells, and parallels the extended competence to neural induction by axial mesoderm. The actions of activin-A and Hensen's node are further distinguished by their effects on lithium-treated ectoderm. These results suggest that neural induction can occur efficiently in response to inducing signals from organizer tissue arrested at a stage prior to gastrulation, and that such early interactions in the blastula may be an important component of neural induction in vertebrate embryos.     

Effects of Inducers on Inner and Outer Gastrula Ectoderm Layers of Xenopus laevis

Abstract. Gastrula ectoderm, isolated from Xenopus laevis , was cultured in Holtfreter solution or modified Leibovitz medium (L-15) by the sandwich-method with or without inducer. The ectoderm (SD cell layers) consists of two cell sheets, representing a superficial (S) and a deep (D) layer. In the L-15 medium rather than in Holtfreter solution, the two cell layers separate out into distinct cell masses. This difference in cell affinity under certain experimental conditions could indicate that the deep layer contains endodermal cells. However, an endodermal character of the deep layer can be ruled out by induction experiments with vegetalizing factor or dorsal blastopore lip as inducers. Under the influence of vegetalizing factor the outer as well as the inner ectoderm layer differentiated into mesodermal derivatives such as notochord and somites. The results of the experiments with dorsal blastopore lip as inducer indicate that both inner and outer ectoderm layers are responsive to the neural stimulus. The lower neural competence of the outer ectoderm layer observed by several authors in normogenesis is discussed with regard to the hypothesis about short distance diffusion of the neuralizing factor and/or close cell-to-cell contact between inducing tissue and ectodermal target cells.     

A homeobox-containing marker of posterior neural differentiation shows the importance of predetermination in neural induction

A homeobox sequence has been used to isolate a new Xenopus cDNA, named XIHbox6. A short probe from this gene serves as an early marker of posterior neural differentiation in the Xenopus nervous system. The gene recognized by this cDNA sequence is first transcribed at the late gastrula stage and solely in the posterior neural cells. The gene is expressed when ectodermal and mesodermal tissues of an early gastrula are placed in contact, but not by either tissue cultured on its own. However, gene expression is most easily inducible in ectoderm from the dorsal region, i.e., in ectoderm normally destined to form neural structures. This establishes the principle, in contrast to previous belief, that the induction of the embryonic nervous system involves a predisposition of the ectoderm and does not depend entirely on an interaction with inducing mesoderm.     

Xwnt-8 modifies the character of mesoderm induced by bFGF in isolated Xenopus ectoderm.

In Xenopus, growth factors of the TGF-beta, FGF and Wnt oncogene families have been proposed to play a role in generating embryonic pattern. In this paper we examine potential interactions between the bFGF and Xwnt-8 signaling pathways in the induction and dorsal-ventral patterning of mesoderm. Injection of Xwnt-8 mRNA into 2-cell Xenopus embryos does not induce mesoderm formation in animal cap ectoderm isolated from these embryos at the blastula stage, but alters the response of this tissue to mesoderm induction by bFGF. While animal cap explants isolated from non-injected embryos differentiate to form ventral types of mesoderm and muscle in response to bFGF, explants from Xwnt-8 injected embryos form dorsal mesodermal and neural tissues in response to the same concentration of bFGF, even if the ectoderm is isolated from the prospective ventral sides of embryos or from UV-ventralized animals. Our results support a model whereby dorso-ventral mesodermal patterning can be attained by a single mesoderm inducing agent, possibly bFGF, which is uniformly distributed across the prospective dorsal-ventral axis, and which acts in concert with a dorsally localized signal, possibly a Wnt protein, which either alters the response of ectoderm to induction or modifies the character of mesoderm after its induction.     

Inducing activity of subcellular fractions from amphibian embryos

Summary The homogenate from unfertilized eggs, gastrulae, neurulae and hatched embryos ofXenopus laevis was fractionated by differential centrifugation and subsequent repeated centrifugation on discontinuous sucrose gradients. A high archencephalic-neural inducing activity was found in RNP particles, which were released from the high-speed (microsomal) sediment by treatment with EDTA, and in a fraction of heterogeneous small vesicles. The highest archencephalic inducing activity was observed in RNP particles from unfertilized eggs and from gastrulae. RNP particles isolated from hatched embryos had a lower inducing activity. The neuralizing factor can be extracted from the small vesicles with pyrophosphate buffer at pH 8.6, but it is not solubilized with a non-ionic detergent (Triton X 100). The high-speed supernatant from the gastrula homogenate contains soluble neuralizing factor, whereas the supernatant from egg homogenate has a low inducing activity. The plasma membrane fraction (isolated from gastrulae) also has only a low inducing activity. The possible significance of the subcellular distribution of neuralizing factors for the transmission of neuralizing inducer from the mesoderm to competent gastrula ectoderm and the processing of signals which are generated on the plasma membrane of induced cells is discussed.     

Role of BMP-4 in the inducing ability of the head organizer in Xenopus laevis

BMP-4 has been implicated in the patterning of the Dorsal-Ventral axis of mesoderm and ectoderm. In this study, we describe the posteriorizing effect of BMP-4 on the neural inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm (dorsal lip region) in Xenopus gastrulae. Dorsal lip explants dissected from stage 10.25 embryos retained anterior inducing ability when precultured for 6 hrs until sibling embryos reach stage 12. When the dorsal lips from stage 10.25 embryos were treated with a range of BMP-4 concentrations, posterior tissues were induced in adjacent ectoderm in a dose-dependent manner. Thus activin-treated explants able to act as head inducers can also induce posterior structures in the presence of BMP-4. To investigate whether BMP-4 directly affects the inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm, we blocked the BMP-4 signaling pathway by injection of mRNA encoding a truncated form of the BMP-4 receptor (tBR) mRNA. Under these conditions, activin-treated explants induced anterior tissues following BMP-4 treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that BMP-4 may affect the head inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm and confer trunk-tail inducing ability during Xenopus gastrulation.     

A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus.

The process by which the vertebrate central nervous system acquires its regional properties remains a central problem in developmental biology. It is generally argued that at early gastrula stages the dorsal mesoderm possesses precise anterior-posterior positional information, which is subsequently imparted to the overlying ectoderm. However, using regionally specific gene probes to monitor regional responses in Xenopus embryos, we find that anterior-posterior properties are not fixed until early neurula stages. During gastrulation the regional inducing capacities of the dorsal mesoderm as well as the regional responses of the presumptive neural ectoderm are activated along the entire anterior-posterior axis when these properties are assayed in recombinant and explant experiments, respectively. Restriction of regional inducing capacity in the mesoderm and responsiveness in the neural ectoderm occur only at neural plate stages.     

Cyclic GMP is not involved in neural induction inXenopus laevis

Summary Recent evidence indicates an important role for cell-surface mediated signal transduction in embryonic induction. We, therefore, started a systematic search to identify signal transduction pathways which are activated during embryonic induction and specifically during neural induction. We showed previously that the protein kinase C and cAMP pathways mediate neural induction inXenopus laevis. Here, we investigated whether cGMP is also involved in the early development of the nervous system. We measured the cGMP content of whole embryos at embryonic stages which mark important events in the early development of the nervous system, as well as in the developing neural tissue itself, after this was induced from ectoderm by dorsal mesoderm. No changes in cGMP content were found, either in whole embryos at different developmental stages, or in developing neural tissue from these stages. We also found no evidence for the presence of nitroprusside stimulatable guanylate cyclase in these developmental stages. A cGMP analogue, 8-Br-cGMP, was not able to induce neural tissue, either alone or in combination with known neural inducers, the phorbol ester TPA and 8-Br-cAMP. 8-Br-cGMP also had no negative influence on the neural inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm or TPA, alone or in combination with 8-Br-cAMP. We conclude that cGMP has no role in the early development of the central nervous system inXenopus laevis. This conclusion underlines the specificity of the signal transduction pathways (PKC and cAMP pathways) that do mediate neural induction.     

Protein kinase C isozymes have distinct roles in neural induction and competence in Xenopus.

The restricted ability of embryonic tissue to respond to inductive signals is controlled by a poorly understood phenomenon, termed competence. In Xenopus, dorsal ectoderm is more competent than ventral ectoderm to become induced to neural tissue. We tested whether the Xenopus protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes alpha and beta have a role in neural induction and competence. We found that PKC alpha is predominantly localized in dorsal ectoderm, whereas PKC beta is uniformly distributed. Overexpression of PKC beta conveys a higher propensity for neural differentiation to both dorsal and ventral ectoderm, but their difference in competence remains. However, ectopic expression of PKC alpha elevates the level of neural competence of ventral ectoderm to that of dorsal ectoderm. These data indicate that different PKC isozymes have distinct roles in mediating both neural induction and competence.     

Vertical versus planar induction in amphibian early development

In the Urodeles, the archenteron roof invaginates as a single continuous sheet of cells, vertically inducing the neural anlage in the overlying ectoderm during invagination. The induction comprises first the activation process, leading, to forebrain differentiation tendencies, and then the superimposed transformation process, which changes presumptive forebrain development into that of hindbrain and spinal cord acting with a caudally increasing intensity. The activating action, being maximal anteriorly, decreases caudally to nearly zero. In the double-layered Xenopus embryo, the internal mesodermal marginal zone shows much more independent and earlier regional segregation and involution than the external marginal zone in the Urodeles; its prechordal mesoderm already initiating vertical neural induction in overlying ectoderm at stages 10 to 10⁺ before any visible archenteron invagination. In Xenopus incomplete exogastrulae the prechordal mesoderm involutes normally prior to evagination of the endoderm and mesodem. Artificially produced Xenopus total exogastrulae, made at stage 9 before mesoderm involution, behave just like axolotl total exogastrulae, showing no neural differentiation. The notion of planar neural induction in Xenopus can only be applied in exogastrulae and Keller explants for the transforming action, which is maximal in the caudal archenteron roof. In normal Xenopus development, the formation of the entire nervous system is essentially due to vertical induction by the successively involuting prechordal and notochordal mesoderm. The different behavior of Xenopus embryos in comparison with Urodele embryos can essentially be explained by the double-layered character of the animal moiety of the Xenopus embryo.     

Mesodermalizing Factors in Fetal Calf Serum

The inducing activities of fetal calf serum (FCS) and fetal calf serum heated for a short time (HFCS) were tested with early gastrula presumptive ectoderm of the newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster as a reactor. Inducing activity was measured by sitting-drop culture of pieces of ectoderm before and after treatment with Ca, Mg-free solution (CMF) in culture medium contained FCS or HFCS (10–50%) as inductor. Results showed that FCS did not induce mesodermalization of ectoderm, before or after treatment with CMF, and that HFCS induced mesodermalization only of ectoderm treated with CMF. The treated ectoderm cells differentiated into mesoderm cells such as muscle and notochord. The induction increased with increase in the duration of CMF treatment and with the concentration of HFCS in the medium. This indicates that FCS changes into mesodermalizing material when heated for a short time and that mesodermal induction by HFCS depends on some effect of CMF on presumptive ectoderm. Since CMF was found to be a neuralizing factor, activation of presumptive ectoderm with a neuralizing factor is probably a prerequisite for mesodermal induction with HFCS.     

Inductive differentiation of two neural lineages reconstituted in a microculture system from Xenopus early gastrula cells.

Neural induction of ectoderm cells has been reconstituted and examined in a microculture system derived from dissociated early gastrula cells of Xenopus laevis. We have used monoclonal antibodies as specific markers to monitor cellular differentiation from three distinct ectoderm lineages in culture (N1 for CNS neurons from neural tube, Me1 for melanophores from neural crest and E3 for skin epidermal cells from epidermal lineages). CNS neurons and melanophores differentiate when deep layer cells of the ventral ectoderm (VE, prospective epidermis region; 150 cells/culture) and an appropriate region of the marginal zone (MZ, prospective mesoderm region; 5-150 cells/culture) are co-cultured, but not in cultures of either cell type on their own; VE cells cultured alone yield epidermal cells as we have previously reported. The extent of inductive neural differentiation in the co-culture system strongly depends on the origin and number of MZ cells initially added to culture wells. The potency to induce CNS neurons is highest for dorsal MZ cells and sharply decreases as more ventrally located cells are used. The same dorsoventral distribution of potency is seen in the ability of MZ cells to inhibit epidermal differentiation. In contrast, the ability of MZ cells to induce melanophores shows the reverse polarity, ventral to dorsal. These data indicate that separate developmental mechanisms are used for the induction of neural tube and neural crest lineages. Co-differentiation of CNS neurons or melanophores with epidermal cells can be obtained in a single well of co-cultures of VE cells (150) and a wide range of numbers of MZ cells (5 to 100). Further, reproducible differentiation of both neural lineages requires intimate association between cells from the two gastrula regions; virtually no differentiation is obtained when cells from the VE and MZ are separated in a culture well. These results indicate that the inducing signals from MZ cells for both neural tube and neural crest lineages affect only nearby ectoderm cells.     

FRL-1, a member of the EGF-CFC family,is essential for neural differentiation in Xenopus early development

Recent studies indicate an essential role for the EGF-CFC family in vertebrate development, particularly in the regulation of nodal signaling. Biochemical evidence suggests that EGF-CFC genes can also activate certain cellular responses independently of nodal signaling. Here, we show that FRL-1, a Xenopus EGF-CFC gene, suppresses BMP signaling to regulate an early step in neural induction. Overexpression of FRL-1 in animal caps induced the early neural markers zic3, soxD and Xngnr-1, but not the pan-mesodermal marker Xbra or the dorsal mesodermal marker chordin. Furthermore, overexpression of FRL-1 suppressed the expression of the BMP-responsive genes, Xvent-1 and Xmsx-1, which are expressed in animal caps and induced by overexpressed BMP-4. Conversely, loss of function analysis using morpholino-antisense oligonucleotides against FRL-1 (FRL-1MO) showed that FRL-1 is required for neural development. FRL-1MO-injected embryos lacked neural structures but contained mesodermal tissue. It was suggested previously that expression of early neural genes that mark the start of neuralization is activated in the presumptive neuroectoderm of gastrulae. FRL-1MO also inhibited the expression of these genes in dorsal ectoderm, but did not affect the expression of chordin, which acts as a neural inducer from dorsal mesoderm. FRL-1MO also inhibited the expression of neural markers that were induced by chordin in animal caps, suggesting that FRL-1 enables the response to neural inducing signals in ectoderm. Furthermore, we showed that the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by FRL-1 is required for neural induction and BMP inhibition. Together, these results suggest that FRL-1 is essential in the establishment of the neural induction response.