Oligomerization properties of the viral oncoproteins adenovirus E1A and human papillomavirus E7 and their complexes with the retinoblastoma protein

Human papillomavirus 16 E7 (HPV16 E7) and adenovirus 5 E1A (Ad5 E1A) are encoded by highly divergent viruses yet are functionally similar in their ability to bind the retinoblastoma (pRB) tumor suppressor protein, causing the aberrant displacement of E2F trancription factors. The amino acid residues of HPV16 E7 that are necessary for stability, for inhibition of pRB function, and for cell transformation are also necessary for E7 oligomerization. However, neither the specific oligomerization state of HPV16 E7 nor of Ad5 E1A as a function of pRB-binding has been characterized. To gain insight into HPV16 E7 and Ad5 E1A oligomerization properties, sedimentation equilibrium experiments were performed with recombinant HPV16 E7 and Ad5 E1A proteins. These studies reveal that, despite the overall functional similarities between these proteins, monomers, dimers, and tetramers of HPV16 E7 were detected while only reversible monomer-dimer association was identified for Ad5 E1A. The apparent K(d(monomer)-(dimer)) of HPV16 E7 is approximately 100-fold lower than that of a comparable region of Ad5 E1A, and it is concluded that under physiological protein concentrations HPV16 E7 exists primarily as a dimer. Sedimentation equilibrium experiments of pRB/Ad5 E1A and of pRB/HPV16 E7 complexes demonstrate that the tight association of pRB with the viral oncoproteins does not disturb their inherent oligomerization properties. Taken together, this study demonstrates significant differences between the Ad5 E1A and HPV16 E7 oligomerization states that are potentially related to their distinct structures and specific mechanisms of pRB-inactivation.     

Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associates with the cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex, which contributes to degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) and other high-risk HPVs are etiologically linked to the development of cervical carcinomas and contribute to a number of other tumors of the anogenital tract, as well as oral cancers. The high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins are consistently expressed in cervical cancer cells and are necessary for the induction and maintenance of the transformed phenotype. An important aspect of HPV16 E7's oncogenic activities is destabilization of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (pRB) through a ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent mechanism, although the exact molecular mechanism is unknown. Here, we report that HPV16 E7 is associated with an enzymatically active cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex and that the HPV16 E7/pRB complex contains cullin 2. Depletion of cullin 2 by RNA interference causes increased steady-state levels and stability of pRB in HPV16 E7-expressing cells, and ectopic expression of HPV16 E7 and the cullin 2 complex leads to pRB ubiquitination in vivo. Hence, we propose that the HPV16 E7-associated cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex contributes to aberrant degradation of the pRB tumor suppressor in HPV16 E7-expressing cells.     

Interactions with pocket proteins contribute to the role of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 in the papillomavirus life cycle

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs), most commonly the HPV16 genotype, are the principle etiological determinant for cervical cancer, a common cancer worldwide resulting in over 200,000 deaths annually. The oncogenic properties of HPVs are attributable in part to the virally encoded protein E7, best known for its ability to bind to and induce the degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, pRb, and related "pocket proteins" p107 and p130. Previously, we defined a role for E7 in the productive stage of the HPV16 life cycle, which takes place in stratified squamous epithelia. HPV perturbs the normal processes of cell growth and differentiation of stratified squamous epithelia. HPVs reprogram cells to support continued DNA synthesis and inhibit their differentiation in the suprabasal compartment of the epithelia, where cells normally have withdrawn from the cell cycle and initiated a well-defined pattern of terminal differentiation. These virus-induced perturbations, which contribute to the production of progeny HPVs, are dependent on E7. In this study, we define the mechanism of action by which E7 contributes to the productive stage of the HPV16 life cycle. We found that the ability of HPV16 to reprogram suprabasal cells to support DNA synthesis correlates with E7's ability to bind pocket proteins but not its ability to induce their degradation. In contrast, the ability of HPV16 to perturb differentiation correlated with both E7's binding to and degradation of pocket proteins. These data indicate that different hallmarks of the productive stage of the HPV16 life cycle rely upon different sets of requirements for E7.     

Regions of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein required for immortalization of human keratinocytes.

Binding of the retinoblastoma gene product (pRB) by viral oncoproteins, including the E7 of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16), is thought to be important in transformation of cells. One of the steps in transformation is the immortalization process. Here we show that mutations in E7 within the full-length genome which inhibit binding of pRB do not abrogate the ability of the HPV 16 DNA to immortalize primary human epithelial (keratinocyte) cells. A mutation in one of the cysteines of a Cys-X-X-Cys motif which is contained in the carboxy half of the E7 and is part of a zinc finger arrangement completely eliminates the ability of HPV 16 DNA to immortalize cells. The results indicate the importance of E7 in the immortalization of primary keratinocytes but suggest that the binding of pRB is not essential.     

Nonconserved lysine residues attenuate the biological function of the low-risk human papillomavirus E7 protein

The mucosotrophic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are classified as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) genotypes based on their neoplastic properties. We have demonstrated previously that the E7 protein destabilizes p130, a pRb-related pocket protein, thereby promoting S-phase reentry in postmitotic, differentiated keratinocytes of squamous epithelia, and that HR HPV E7 does so more efficiently than LR HPV E7. The E7 proteins of LR HPV-11 and -6b uniquely possess lysine residues following a casein kinase II phosphorylation motif which is critical for the biological function of E7. We now show that mutations of these lysine residues elevated the efficiency of S-phase reentry, independent of their charge. An 11E7 K39,42R mutation moderately increased the association with and the destabilization of p130. Unexpectedly, polyubiquitination on these lysine residues did not attenuate E7 activity, as their mutation caused elevated proteasomal degradation and decreased protein stability. In this regard, the biologically more potent HR HPV E7 proteins were also less stable than the LR HPV E7 proteins. We infer that these lysine residues impede functional protein-protein interactions. A G22D mutation of 11E7 at the pocket protein binding motif possessed augmented efficiency in promoting S-phase reentry and strongly enhanced association with p130 and pRb. The combined effects of these two classes of 11E7 mutations exhibited an efficiency of S-phase reentry comparable to that of HR HPV E7. Thus, these nonconserved residues are primarily responsible for the differential abilities of LR and HR HPV E7 proteins to promote unscheduled DNA replication in organotypic raft cultures.     

Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein inhibits DNA binding by the retinoblastoma gene product.

The human papillomavirus E7 gene can transform murine fibroblasts and cooperate with other viral oncogenes in transforming primary cell cultures. One biochemical property associated with the E7 protein is binding to the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product (pRB). Biochemical properties associated with pRB include binding to viral transforming proteins (E1A, large T, and E7), binding to cellular proteins (E2F and Myc), and binding to DNA. The mechanism by which E7 stimulates cell growth is uncertain. However, E7 binding to pRB inhibits binding of cellular proteins to pRB and appears to block the growth-suppressive activity of pRB. We have found that E7 also inhibits binding of pRB to DNA. A 60-kDa version of pRB (pRB60) produced in reticulocyte translation reactions or in bacteria bound quantitatively to DNA-cellulose. Recombinant E7 protein used at a 1:1 or 10:1 molar ratio with pRB60 blocked 50 or greater than 95% of pRB60 DNA-binding activity, respectively. A mutant E7 protein (E7-Ala-24) with reduced pRB60-binding activity exhibited a parallel reduction in its blocking of pRB60 binding to DNA. An E7(20-29) peptide that blocks binding of E7 protein to pRB60 restored the DNA-binding activity of pRB60 in the presence of E7. Peptide E7(2-32) did not block pRB60 binding to DNA, while peptide E7(20-57) and an E7 fragment containing residues 1 to 60 partially blocked DNA binding. E7 species containing residues 3 to 75 were fully effective at blocking pRB60 binding to DNA. These studies indicate that E7 protein specifically blocks pRB60 binding to DNA and suggest that the E7 region responsible for this property lies between residues 32 and 75. The functional significance of these observations is unclear. However, we have found that a point mutation in pRB60 that impairs DNA-binding activity also blocks the ability of pRB60 to inhibit cell growth. This correlation suggests that the DNA-binding activity of retinoblastoma proteins contributes to their biological properties.     

Association of cottontail rabbit papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins with the hDlg/SAP97 tumor suppressor

Papillomaviruses are small DNA viruses that infect epithelial tissues and cause warts. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the primary risk factor for the development of cervical cancer. The E6 and E7 oncogenes are the only genes consistently expressed in HPV-positive cervical cancer cells. Cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) induces papillomas and carcinomas on cottontail and domestic rabbits and provides an excellent animal model of HPV infection and vaccine development. CRPV encodes three transforming proteins; LE6, SE6, and E7. Each of these proteins is required for papilloma formation. Like HPV E7, the CRPV E7 protein binds to the tumor suppressor pRB. In contrast, unlike HPV E6, the CRPV E6 proteins do not bind the tumor suppressor p53. Although more than a dozen cellular proteins have been identified as HPV E6 interacting proteins, nothing is known about the cellular interacting proteins of CRPV E6s. Here we describe the association of CRPV E6s with hDlg/SAP97, the mammalian homolog of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein. HPV E6 has previously shown to bind and target hDlg/SAP97 for degradation. Our results demonstrate that both LE6 and SE6 interact with hDlg/SAP97, although their association does not lead to the degradation of hDlg/SAP97. The PDZ domains of hDlg were shown to be sufficient for interaction with CRPV E6 proteins while the C-terminus of CRPV E6 is essential for the interaction with hDlg. The association of hDlg with SE6 may be important but not sufficient for the transformation of NIH 3T3 cells by SE6. Importantly, a CRPV SE6 mutant defective for papilloma formation did not interact with hDlg. These results suggest that interaction with hDlg/SAP97 plays a role in the biological function of CRPV E6s.     

Kinetic analysis of the interactions of human papillomavirus E6 oncoproteins with the ubiquitin ligase E6AP using surface plasmon resonance

Cervical cancers evolve from lesions generated by genital human papillomaviruses (HPV). "Low-risk" genital HPVs cause benign proliferations whereas "high-risk" types have the potential to progress into cancer. High-risk HPV E6 oncoproteins interact with the ubiquitin ligase E6AP and target several cellular proteins, including p53 and proteins of the MAGI family, towards ubiquitin-mediated degradation. E6AP, like other E6 binding proteins such as E6BP, IRF-3 and paxillin, interacts with E6 via a consensus leucine-charged motif. Here we have investigated the kinetics of the interactions of a 15-mer peptide containing the LxxvarphiLsh motif of E6AP with E6. For this we have developed a Biacore assay based on antibody-capture on the sensor surface of GST- and/or MBP-E6AP peptide constructs followed by E6 protein injection. Our experiments show that E6 oncoproteins from four major high-risk (16, 18, 33 and 58) HPV types bind to E6AP with equilibrium dissociation constants in the low micromolar range. The kinetic dissociation parameters of these interactions are remarkably similar. On the other hand, low-risk HPV 11 E6 does not interact with E6AP even at relatively high concentrations. We also show that the two zinc-binding domains of E6 are required for E6AP recognition. Finally, we have analysed the binding properties of site-directed mutants of the E6AP-derived peptide. We demonstrate the importance for binding of conserved aliphatic side-chains and the moderate role of the global negative charge of the peptide. This work provides the first quantitative data on an HPV E6-mediated interaction, which support the current models of E6AP-mediated degradation.     

E1A blocks hyperphosphorylation of p130 and p107 without affecting the phosphorylation status of the retinoblastoma protein

The phosphorylation status of the pRB family of growth suppressor proteins is regulated in a cell cycle entry-, progression-, and exit-dependent manner in normal cells. We have shown previously that p130, a member of this family, exhibits patterns of phosphorylated forms associated with various cell growth and differentiation stages. However, human 293 cells, which are transformed cells that express the adenoviral oncoproteins E1A and E1B, exhibit an abnormal pattern of p130 phosphorylated forms. Here we report that, unlike pRB, the phosphorylation status of both p130 and p107 is not modulated during the cell cycle in 293 cells as it is in other cells. Conditional overexpression of individual G(1)/S cyclins in 293 cells does not alter the phosphorylation status of p130, suggesting that the expression of E1A and/or E1B blocks hyperphosphorylation of p130. In agreement with these observations, transient cotransfection of vectors expressing E1A 12S, but not E1B, in combination with pocket proteins into U-2 OS cells blocks hyperphosphorylation of both p130 and p107. However, the phosphorylation status of pRB is not altered by cotransfection of E1A 12S vectors. Moreover, MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts stably expressing E1A 12S also exhibit a block in hyperphosphorylation of endogenous p130 and p107. Direct binding of E1A to p130 and p107 is not required for the phosphorylation block since E1A 12S mutants defective in binding to the pRB family also block hyperphosphorylation of p130 and p107. Our data reported here identify a novel function of E1A, which affects p130 and p107 but does not affect pRB. Since E1A does not bind the hyperphosphorylated forms of p130, this function of E1A might prevent the existence of "free" hyperphosphorylated p130, which could act as a CDK inhibitor.     

The Canine Papillomavirus and Gamma HPV E7 Proteins Use an Alternative Domain to Bind and Destabilize the Retinoblastoma Protein

The high-risk HPV E6 and E7 proteins cooperate to immortalize primary human cervical cells and the E7 protein can independently transform fibroblasts in vitro, primarily due to its ability to associate with and degrade the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, pRb. The binding of E7 to pRb is mediated by a conserved Leu-X-Cys-X-Glu (LXCXE) motif in the conserved region 2 (CR2) of E7 and this domain is both necessary and sufficient for E7/pRb association. In the current study, we report that the E7 protein of the malignancy-associated canine papillomavirus type 2 encodes an E7 protein that has serine substituted for cysteine in the LXCXE motif. In HPV, this substitution in E7 abrogates pRb binding and degradation. However, despite variation at this critical site, the canine papillomavirus E7 protein still bound and degraded pRb. Even complete deletion of the LXSXE domain of canine E7 failed to interfere with binding to pRb in vitro and in vivo. Rather, the dominant binding site for pRb mapped to the C-terminal domain of canine E7. Finally, while the CR1 and CR2 domains of HPV E7 are sufficient for degradation of pRb, the C-terminal region of canine E7 was also required for pRb degradation. Screening of HPV genome sequences revealed that the LXSXE motif of the canine E7 protein was also present in the gamma HPVs and we demonstrate that the gamma HPV-4 E7 protein also binds pRb in a similar way. It appears, therefore, that the type 2 canine PV and gamma-type HPVs not only share similar properties with respect to tissue specificity and association with immunosuppression, but also the mechanism by which their E7 proteins interact with pRb.     

Differential regulation of cutaneous oncoprotein HPVE6 by wtp53, mutant p53R248W and ΔNp63α is HPV type dependent

UV exposure and p53 mutations are major factors in non-melanoma skin cancer, whereas a role for HPV infections has not been defined. Previous data demonstrated the wtp53-mediated degradation of cutaneous HPV20E6 by caspase-3. ΔNp63α and hot-spot mutant p53R248W conveyed a protective effect on HPV20E6 under these conditions. We demonstrate a differential regulation by wtp53 of the E6 genes of cutaneous types HPV4, HPV5, HPV7, HPV27, HPV38, HPV48, HPV60 and HPV77. Caspase- or proteasome-mediated down-regulation was HPV type dependent. Mutant p53R248W up-regulated expression of all these E6 proteins as did ΔNp63α except for HPV38E6 which was down-regulated by the latter. None of these cellular proteins affected HPV41E6 expression. Ectopic expression of both mutp53R248W and ΔNp63α in the normal NIKS keratinocyte cell line harbouring endogenous p53 and p63however led to a down-regulation of HPV20E6. We demonstrate that HPV20E6 expression in these cells is modulated by additional, yet unidentified, cellular protein(s), which are not necessarily involved in apoptosis or autophagy. We further demonstrate proliferation of HPV20E6-expressing keratinocytes. Levels of proteins involved in cell cycle control, cyclin-D1, cdk6 and p16(INK4a), phosphorylated pRB, as well as c-Jun and p-c-Jun, were all increased in these cells. HPV20E6 did not compete for the interaction between p16(INK4a) with cyclin-D1 or cdk6. Phosphorylation of pRB in the HPV20E6 expressing cells seems to be sufficient to override the cytokenetic block induced by the p16(INK4a)/pRB pathway. The present study demonstrates the diverse influence of p53 family members on individual cutaneous HPVE6 proteins. HPV20E6 expression also resulted in varying protein levels of factors involved in proliferation and differentiation.     

Conditionally activated E7 proteins of high-risk and low-risk human papillomaviruses induce S phase in postmitotic, differentiated human keratinocytes

The productive program of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) in epithelia is tightly linked to squamous differentiation. The E7 proteins of high-risk HPV genotypes efficiently inactivate the pRB family of proteins that control the cell cycle, triggering S phase in suprabasal keratinocytes. This ability has until now not been demonstrated for the low-risk HPV-6 or HPV-11 E7 proteins. An inducible system in which HPV-16 E7 is fused to the ligand binding domain of the human estrogen receptor (ER) was described by Smith-McCune et al. (K. Smith-McCune, D. Kalman, C. Robbins, S. Shivakumar, L. Yuschenkoff, and J. M. Bishop, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6999-7004, 1999). In the absence of hormone, E7ER is cytoplasmic, and upon addition of 17beta-estradiol, it translocates to the nucleus. Using organotypic epithelial raft cultures developed from primary human keratinocytes, we show that 16E7ER promotes either S-phase reentry or p21cip1 accumulation in differentiated keratinocytes in a stochastic manner as early as 6 h postinduction with 17beta-estradiol. A vector expressing the ER moiety alone had no effect. These observations prove unequivocally that the E7 protein drives S-phase reentry in postmitotic, differentiated keratinocytes rather than preventing S-phase exit while the cells ascend through the epithelium. HPV-11 E7ER and, much less efficiently, HPV-6 E7ER also promoted S-phase reentry by differentiated cells upon exposure to 17beta-estradiol. S-phase induction required the consensus pRB binding motif. We propose that the elevated nuclear levels of the low-risk HPV E7 protein afforded by the inducible system account for the positive results. These observations are entirely consistent with the fact that low-risk HPV genotypes replicate in the differentiated strata in patient specimens, as do the high-risk HPVs.