Tau and Phase Response Curves for Non-photic Stimuli in Blinded Rats

Although light is the principal Zeitgeber in mammals, non-photic stimuli have also been described as affecting the properties of a circadian pacemaker. In the present experiment we tested the effect of 4 types of non-photic stimuli (heat and cold pulses, dexamethasone injection and access to a running-wheel) on the circadian rhythm of the motor activity of blinded Wistar rats. The Phase Response Curve and the Tau Response Curve for each stimulus were obtained. Our results show no clear effect of non-photic stimuli on the circadian rhythm of the rat, and thus, question the capacity of these animals to respond to single pulses other than light, and consequently the importance of these type of stimuli in this species.     

Integration of human sleep-wake regulation and circadian rhythmicity.

The human sleep-wake cycle is generated by a circadian process, originating from the suprachiasmatic nuclei, in interaction with a separate oscillatory process: the sleep homeostat. The sleep-wake cycle is normally timed to occur at a specific phase relative to the external cycle of light-dark exposure. It is also timed at a specific phase relative to internal circadian rhythms, such as the pineal melatonin rhythm, the circadian sleep-wake propensity rhythm, and the rhythm of responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker to light. Variations in these internal and external phase relationships, such as those that occur in blindness, aging, morning and evening, and advanced and delayed sleep-phase syndrome, lead to sleep disruptions and complaints. Changes in ocular circadian photoreception, interindividual variation in the near-24-h intrinsic period of the circadian pacemaker, and sleep homeostasis can contribute to variations in external and internal phase. Recent findings on the physiological and molecular-genetic correlates of circadian sleep disorders suggest that the timing of the sleep-wake cycle and circadian rhythms is closely integrated but is, in part, regulated differentially.     

Getting through to circadian oscillators: why use constant routines?

Overt 24-h rhythmicity is composed of both exogenous and endogenous components, reflecting the product of multiple (periodic) feedback loops with a core pacemaker at their center. Researchers attempting to reveal the endogenous circadian (near 24-h) component of rhythms commonly conduct their experiments under constant environmental conditions. However, even under constant environmental conditions, rhythmic changes in behavior, such as food intake or the sleep-wake cycle, can contribute to observed rhythmicity in many physiological and endocrine variables. Assessment of characteristics of the core circadian pacemaker and its direct contribution to rhythmicity in different variables, including rhythmicity in gene expression, may be more reliable when such periodic behaviors are eliminated or kept constant across all circadian phases. This is relevant for the assessment of the status of the circadian pacemaker in situations in which the sleep-wake cycle or food intake regimes are altered because of external conditions, such as in shift work or jet lag. It is also relevant for situations in which differences in overt rhythmicity could be due to changes in either sleep oscillatory processes or circadian rhythmicity, such as advanced or delayed sleep phase syndromes, in aging, or in particular clinical conditions. Researchers studying human circadian rhythms have developed constant routine protocols to assess the status of the circadian pacemaker in constant behavioral and environmental conditions, whereas this technique is often thought to be unnecessary in the study of animal rhythms. In this short review, the authors summarize constant routine methodology and what has been learned from constant routines and argue that animal and human circadian rhythm researchers should (continue to) use constant routines as a step on the road to getting through to central and peripheral circadian oscillators in the intact organism.     

Modeling the emergence of circadian rhythms in a clock neuron network

Circadian rhythms in pacemaker cells persist for weeks in constant darkness, while in other types of cells the molecular oscillations that underlie circadian rhythms damp rapidly under the same conditions. Although much progress has been made in understanding the biochemical and cellular basis of circadian rhythms, the mechanisms leading to damped or self-sustained oscillations remain largely unknown. There exist many mathematical models that reproduce the circadian rhythms in the case of a single cell of the Drosophila fly. However, not much is known about the mechanisms leading to coherent circadian oscillation in clock neuron networks. In this work we have implemented a model for a network of interacting clock neurons to describe the emergence (or damping) of circadian rhythms in Drosophila fly, in the absence of zeitgebers. Our model consists of an array of pacemakers that interact through the modulation of some parameters by a network feedback. The individual pacemakers are described by a well-known biochemical model for circadian oscillation, to which we have added degradation of PER protein by light and multiplicative noise. The network feedback is the PER protein level averaged over the whole network. In particular, we have investigated the effect of modulation of the parameters associated with (i) the control of net entrance of PER into the nucleus and (ii) the non-photic degradation of PER. Our results indicate that the modulation of PER entrance into the nucleus allows the synchronization of clock neurons, leading to coherent circadian oscillations under constant dark condition. On the other hand, the modulation of non-photic degradation cannot reset the phases of individual clocks subjected to intrinsic biochemical noise.     

Physiological basis for photic entrainment

The suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus contain a major circadian pacemaker. The most important external stimulus that affects the circadian pacemaker is the environmental light-dark cycle. The effects of light and darkness on the pacemaker at various phases of the circadian cycle have been well documented. In this paper these effects are summarized briefly. A number of pharmacological and neurophysiological studies will then be presented that are related to the processing of light information by the circadian system. It will be considered whether these studies have increased insight in the behavioral responsiveness to light.     

Chronic ethanol intake alters circadian period-responses to brief light pulses in rats

Although chronic alcohol intake is associated with widespread disruptions of sleep-wake cycles and other daily biological rhythms in both human alcoholics and experimental animals, the extent to which the chronobiological effects of alcohol are mediated by effects on the underlying circadian pacemaker remains unknown. Nevertheless, recent studies indicate that both adult and perinatal ethanol treatments may alter the free-running period and photic responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker. The present experiment was designed to further characterize the effects of chronic ethanol intake on the response of the rat circadian pacemaker to brief light pulses. Ethanol-treated and control animals were exposed to 15-min light pulses during either early or late subjective night on the first day of constant darkness following entrainment to a 12:12 light-dark cycle. Relative to pulses delivered during early subjective night and to “no-pulse” conditions, light pulses delivered during late subjective night resulted in period-shortening after-effects under constant darkness, but only in control animals, not in ethanol-treated animals. These results indicate that chronic ethanol intake reduces the responsiveness of the circadian pacemaker to acute photic stimulation, and suggest that the chronobiological disruptions seen in human alcoholics are due in part to alterations in circadian pacemaker function.     

Melatonin rhythm observed throughout a three-cycle bright-light stimulus designed to reset the human circadian pacemaker.

Exposure to light and darkness can rapidly induce phase shifts of the human circadian pacemaker. A type 0 phase response curve (PRC) to light that has been reported for humans was based on circadian phase data collected from constant routines performed before and after a three-cycle light stimulus, but resetting data observed throughout the entire resetting protocol have not been previously reported. Pineal melatonin secretion is governed by the hypothalamic circadian pacemaker via a well-defined neural pathway and is reportedly less subject to the masking effects of sleep and activity than body temperature. The authors reasoned that observation of the melatonin rhythm throughout the three-cycle light resetting trials could provide daily phase-resetting information, allowing a dynamic view of the resetting response of the circadian pacemaker to light. Subjects (n = 12) living in otherwise dim light (approximately 10-15 lux) were exposed to a noncritical stimulus of three cycles of bright light (approximately 9500 lux for 5 h per day) timed to phase advance or phase delay the human circadian pacemaker; control subjects (n = 11) were scheduled to the same protocols but exposed to three 5-h darkness cycles instead of light. Subjects underwent initial and final constant routine phase assessments; hourly melatonin samples and body temperature data were collected throughout the protocol. Average daily phase shifts of 1 to 3 h were observed in 11 of 12 subjects receiving the bright light, supporting predictions obtained using Kronauer's phase-amplitude model of the resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker. The melatonin rhythm in the 12th subject progressively attenuated in amplitude throughout the resetting trial, becoming undetectable for >32 hours preceding an abrupt reappearance of the rhythm at a shifted phase with a recovered amplitude. The data from control subjects who remained in dim lighting and darkness delayed on average -0.2 h per day, consistent with the daily delay expected due to the longer than 24-h intrinsic period of the human circadian pacemaker. Both temperature and melatonin rhythms shifted by equivalent amounts in both bright light-treated and control subjects (R = 0.968; p<0.0001; n = 23). Observation of the melatonin rhythm throughout a three-cycle resetting trial has provided a dynamic view of the daily phase-resetting response of the human circadian pacemaker. Taken together with the observation of strong type 0 resetting in humans in response to the same three-cycle stimulus applied at a critical phase, these data confirm the importance of considering both phase and amplitude when describing the resetting of the human circadian pacemaker by light.     

Nonphotic entrainment in humans?

Although light is accepted as the dominant zeitgeber for entrainment of the human circadian system, there is evidence that nonphotic stimuli may play a role. This review critically assesses the current evidence in support of nonphotic entrainment in humans. Studies involving manipulations of sleep-wake schedules, exercise, mealtimes, and social stimuli are re-examined, bearing in mind the fact that the human circadian clock is sensitive to very dim light and has a free-running period very close to 24 h. Because of light confounds, the study of totally blind subjects with free-running circadian rhythms represents the ideal model to investigate the effects of nonphotic stimuli on circadian phase and period. Strong support for nonphotic entrainment in humans has already come from the study of a few blind subjects with entrained circadian rhythms. However, in these studies the nonphotic stimulus(i) responsible was not identified. The effect of appropriately timed exercise or exogenous melatonin represents the best proof to date of an effect of nonphotic stimuli on human circadian timing. Phase-response curves for both exercise and melatonin have been constructed. Given the powerful effect of feeding as a circadian zeitgeber in various nonhuman species, studies of meal timing are recommended. In conclusion, the available evidence indicates that it remains worthwhile to continue to study nonphotic effects on human circadian timing to identify treatment strategies for shift workers and transmeridian travelers as well as for the blind and possibly the elderly.     

Acute exposure to 2G phase shifts the rat circadian timing system

The circadian timing system (CTS) provides internal and external temporal coordination of an animal's physiology and behavior. In mammals, the generation and coordination of these circadian rhythms is controlled by a neural pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), located within the hypothalamus. The pacemaker is synchronized to the 24 hour day by time cues (zeitgebers) such as the light/dark cycle. When an animal is exposed to an environment without time cues, the circadian rhythms maintain internal temporal coordination but exhibit a "free-running" condition in which the period length is determined by the internal pacemaker. Maintenance of internal and external temporal coordination are critical for normal physiological and psychological function in human and non-human primates. Exposure to altered gravitational environments has been shown to affect the amplitude, mean, and timing of circadian rhythms in species ranging from unicellular organisms to man. However, it has not been determined whether altered gravitational fields have a direct effect on the neural pacemaker, or affect peripheral physiological systems that express these circadian parameters. In previous studies, the ability of a stimulus to phase shift circadian rhythms was used to determine whether a stimulus has a direct effect on the neural pacemaker. The present experiment was performed in order to determine whether acute exposure to a hyperdynamic field could phase shift circadian rhythms.     

Mathematical Models for Sleep-Wake Dynamics: Comparison of the Two-Process Model and a Mutual Inhibition Neuronal Model

Sleep is essential for the maintenance of the brain and the body, yet many features of sleep are poorly understood and mathematical models are an important tool for probing proposed biological mechanisms. The most well-known mathematical model of sleep regulation, the two-process model, models the sleep-wake cycle by two oscillators: a circadian oscillator and a homeostatic oscillator. An alternative, more recent, model considers the mutual inhibition of sleep promoting neurons and the ascending arousal system regulated by homeostatic and circadian processes. Here we show there are fundamental similarities between these two models. The implications are illustrated with two important sleep-wake phenomena. Firstly, we show that in the two-process model, transitions between different numbers of daily sleep episodes can be classified as grazing bifurcations. This provides the theoretical underpinning for numerical results showing that the sleep patterns of many mammals can be explained by the mutual inhibition model. Secondly, we show that when sleep deprivation disrupts the sleep-wake cycle, ostensibly different measures of sleepiness in the two models are closely related. The demonstration of the mathematical similarities of the two models is valuable because not only does it allow some features of the two-process model to be interpreted physiologically but it also means that knowledge gained from study of the two-process model can be used to inform understanding of the behaviour of the mutual inhibition model. This is important because the mutual inhibition model and its extensions are increasingly being used as a tool to understand a diverse range of sleep-wake phenomena such as the design of optimal shift-patterns, yet the values it uses for parameters associated with the circadian and homeostatic processes are very different from those that have been experimentally measured in the context of the two-process model.     

Chronic clorgyline treatment of Syrian hamsters: an analysis of effects on the circadian pacemaker

Clorgyline, a type A monoamine oxidase inhibitor with antidepressant properties when administered to depressed patients, is often associated with disturbances of the human sleep-wake cycle. In order to assess its effects on the mammalian circadian system, this drug was administered chronically to Syrian hamsters. It was found to affect the hamster circadian system in four specific ways. Clorgyline increased the intrinsic period of wheel-running activity, altered the phase response curve to brief light pulses, altered the reduced waveform of running activity in animals maintained in light-dark cycles or constant darkness, and increased the activity-rest ratio in animals maintained in constant darkness. Our data support the interpretation that clorgyline exhibits direct or indirect input to the circadian pacemaker and alters the processing of photic information to the pacemaker.     

A circadian rhythm in heart rate variability contributes to the increased cardiac sympathovagal response to awakening in the morning

Morning hours are associated with a heightened risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Recent evidence suggests that the sleep-wake cycle and endogenous circadian system modulate cardiac function in humans and may contribute to these epidemiological findings. The aim of the present study was to investigate the interaction between circadian and sleep-wake-dependent processes on heart rate variability (HRV). Fifteen diurnally active healthy young adults underwent a 72-h ultradian sleep-wake cycle (USW) procedure (alternating 60-min wake episodes in dim light and 60-min nap opportunities in total darkness) in time isolation. The present study revealed a significant main effect of sleep-wake-dependent and circadian processes on cardiac rhythmicity, as well as a significant interaction between these processes. Turning the lights off was associated with a rapid increase in mean RR interval and cardiac parasympathetic modulation (high-frequency [HF] power), whereas low-frequency (LF) power and sympathovagal balance (LF:HF ratio) were reduced (p?≤?.001). A significant circadian rhythm in mean RR interval and HRV components was observed throughout the wake and nap episodes (p?≤?.001). Sleep-to-wake transitions occurring in the morning were associated with maximal shifts towards sympathetic autonomic activation as compared to those occurring during the rest of the day. Namely, peak LF:HF ratio was observed in the morning, coincidental with peak salivary cortisol levels. These results contribute to our understanding of the observed increase in cardiovascular vulnerability after awakening in the morning.     

Commentary: models of sleep regulation: successes and continuing challenges

Quantitative models have been developed to describe salient aspects of human sleep regulation. The two-process model of sleep regulation and the thermoregulatory model of sleep control highlight the interaction between sleep homeostasis and circadian rhythmicity and the association between sleep and temperature regulation, respectively. These models have been successful and inspiring, but continuing progress remains dependent on rigorous testing of some of their basic assumptions. Whereas it has been established that EEG slow-wave activity is a marker of sleep homeostasis, its causal role in regulating the timing of sleep and wakefulness remains to be demonstrated conclusively. Likewise, the causal role of the temperature regulatory system in sleep timing requires further investigation. In both models, many parameters have yet to be associated with specific physiologic processes. This makes it challenging, at least within the framework of these models, to account for interindividual differences or age-related changes in such features as sleep duration and sleep timing, as well as changes in the phase angle between the sleep-wake cycle and accepted markers of the circadian pacemaker, such as the body temperature or melatonin rhythm. Although the models may describe adequately global sleep patterns and their circadian modulation, detailed modeling of the frequent short awakenings from, and the subsequent transitions back to, sleep, as well as the variation of the propensity to awaken across the ultradian non-REM-REM cycle, is not addressed. Incoporation of these aspects of sleep in mathematical models of sleep regulation may further our understanding of a key aspect of sleep regulation, that is, its timing.     

Revised limit cycle oscillator model of human circadian pacemaker

In 1990, Kronauer proposed a mathematical model of the effects of light on the human circadian pacemaker. This study presents several refinements to Kronauer's original model of the pacemaker that enable it to predict more accurately the experimental results from a number of different studies of the effects of the intensity, timing, and duration of light stimuli on the human circadian pacemaker. These refinements include the following: The van der Pol oscillator from Kronauer's model has been replaced with a higher order limit cycle oscillator so that the system's amplitude recovery is slower near the singularity and faster near the limit cycle; the phase and amplitude of the circadian rhythm in sensitivity to light from Kronauer's model has been refined so that the peak sensitivity to light on the limit cycle now occurs approximately 4 h before the core body temperature minimum (CBTmin) and is three times as great as the minimum sensitivity on the limit cycle; the critical phase (at which type 1 phase response curves [PRCs] can be distinguished from type 0 PRCs) that occurs at CBT,n now corresponds to 0.8 h after the minimum of x (x(min) in this refined model rather than to the exact timing of x(min) as in Kronauer's model; a direct effect of light on circadian period was incorporated into the model such that as light intensity increases, the period decreases, which is in accordance with Aschoff's rule.     

Dynamic resetting of the human circadian pacemaker by intermittent bright light

In humans, experimental studies of circadian resetting typically have been limited to lengthy episodes of exposure to continuous bright light. To evaluate the time course of the human endogenous circadian pacemaker's resetting response to brief episodes of intermittent bright light, we studied 16 subjects assigned to one of two intermittent lighting conditions in which the subjects were presented with intermittent episodes of bright-light exposure at 25- or 90-min intervals. The effective duration of bright-light exposure was 31% or 63% compared with a continuous 5-h bright-light stimulus. Exposure to intermittent bright light elicited almost as great a resetting response compared with 5 h of continuous bright light. We conclude that exposure to intermittent bright light produces robust phase shifts of the endogenous circadian pacemaker. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that humans, like other species, exhibit an enhanced sensitivity to the initial minutes of bright-light exposure.     

Phase-dependent effect of room light exposure in a 5-h advance of the sleep-wake cycle: implications for jet lag

The acute disruption in sleep quality, vigilance levels, and cognitive and athletic performance observed after transmeridian flights is presumed to be the result of a transient misalignment between the endogenous circadian pacemaker and the shifted sleep schedule. Several laboratory and field experiments have demonstrated that exposure to bright artificial light can accelerate circadian entrainment to a shifted sleep-wake schedule. In the present study, the authors investigated whether the schedule of exposure to indoor room light, to which urban dwellers are typically exposed, can substantially affect circadian adaptation to a simulated eastward voyage. We enrolled 15 healthy young men in a laboratory simulation of a Montreal-to-London voyage. Subjects were exposed to 6 h of room light (mean +/- SD: 379+/-10) prior to bedtime (n = 7) or when on a progressively advancing schedule (n = 8) early in the day. The remaining 10 hours of wakefulness were spent in dim light (4+/-1 lux). Circadian assessments, performed via the constant routine procedure, evaluated the phase of the endogenous circadian rhythms of core body temperature and plasma melatonin before and after 1 week on the shifted schedule. At the end of the study, only subjects exposed to room light on the advancing schedule expressed oscillations of the endogenous circadian pacemaker in phase with the new sleep-wake cycle. In this group, a mean advance shift of the nadir of core body temperature of +5:22+/-0:15 h was observed, with parallel shifts in plasma melatonin concentration and subjective alertness. The circadian rhythms of subjects exposed to room light later in the day remained much more adjusted to the departure than to the destination time zone. These results demonstrate that the schedule of exposure to room light can substantially affect circadian adaptation to a shifted sleep-wake schedule.     

Use of benzodiazepines to manipulate the circadian clock regulating behavioral and endocrine rhythms

Extensive studies have now been carried out demonstrating that the systemic administration of the short-acting benzodiazepine, triazolam, can have pronounced effects on both behavioral and endocrine circadian rhythms. For example, three daily injections of triazolam can phase-advance the circadian rhythm of pituitary luteinizing hormone release and locomotor activity by about 2-3 h in female hamsters maintained in constant light. Triazolam has also been found to facilitate the rate of reentrainment of the activity rhythm following an 8-hour advance or delay in the light-dark cycle. Limited studies with other short-acting benzodiazepines indicate that the effects of triazolam on the circadian system of hamsters can be generalized to this class of drugs. Recent studies in humans indicate that treatment with triazolam can alter the time it takes for human endocrine rhythms to become reentrained following an 8-hour delay in the sleep-wake and light-dark cycle. Such findings raise the possibility that short-acting benzodiazepines may prove useful in reducing the symptoms associated with 'jet-lag' and rotating shift-work schedules as well as in the treatment of various physical and mental illnesses that have been associated with a disorder of biological timekeeping.     

Interpreting the human phase response curve to multiple bright-light exposures

Czeisler and his colleagues have recently reported that bright light can induce strong (Type O) resetting of the human circadian pacemaker. This surprising result shows that the human clock is more responsive to light than has been previously thought. The interpretation of their results is subtle, however, because of an unconventional aspect of their experimental protocol: They measured the phase shift after three cycles of the bright-light stimulus, rather than after the usual single pulse. A natural question is whether the apparent Type O response could reflect the summation of three weaker Type 1 responses to each of the daily light pulses. In this paper I show mathematically that repeated Type 1 resetting cannot account for the observed Type O response. This finding corroborates the strong resetting reported by Czeisler et al., and supports their claim that bright light induces strong resetting by crushing the amplitude of the circadian pacemaker. Furthermore, the results indicate that back-to-back light pulses can have a cooperative effect different from that obtained by simple iteration of a phase response curve (PRC). In this sense the resetting response of humans is similar to that of Drosophila, Kalanchoe, and Culex, and is more complex than that predicted by conventional PRC theory. To describe the way in which light resets the human circadian pacemaker, one needs a theory that includes amplitude resetting, as pioneered by Winfree and developed for humans by Kronauer.     

Regression Models for the Estimation of Orcadian Rhythms in the Presence of Effects Due to Masking

The estimation of human circadian rhythms from experimental data is complicated by the presence of “masking” effects associated with the sleep-wake cycle. The observed rhythm may include a component due to masking, as well as the endogenous component linked to a circadian pacemaker. In situations where the relationship between the sleep-wake cycle and the circadian rhythm is not constant, it may be possible to obtain individual estimates of these two components, but methods commonly used for the estimation of circadian rhythms, such as the cosinor analysis, spectral analysis, average waveforms and complex demodulation, have not generally been adapted to identify the modulations that arise from masking. The estimates relate to the observed rhythms, and the amplitudes and acrophases do not necessarily refer to the endogenous rhythm.

In this paper methods are discussed for the separation of circadian and masking effects using regression models that incorporate a sinusoidal circadian variation together with functions of time since sleep and time during sleep. The basic model can be extended to include a time-varying circadian rhythm and estimates are available for the amplitude and phase at a given time, together with their joint confidence intervals and tests for changes in amplitude and acrophase between any two selected times. Modifications of these procedures are discussed to allow for non-sinusoidal circadian rhythms, non-additivity of the circadian and time-since-sleep effects and the breakdown of the usual assumptions concerning the residual errors.

This approach enables systematic masking effects associated with the sleep-wake cycle to be separated from the circadian rhythm, and it has applications to the analysis of data from experiments where the sleep-wake cycle is not synchronized with the circadian rhythm, for example after time-zone transitions or during irregular schedules of work and rest.