Reduction mammaplasty following radiation therapy for breast cancer.

This report describes an unusual case in which reduction mammaplasty was performed following radiation therapy for breast cancer. While healing was significantly prolonged (compared with the nonirradiated contralateral breast), the final result was satisfactory from both the functional and the aesthetic standpoint. Women with prior radiation therapy may be considered candidates for reduction mammaplasty. Patients should be warned of the increased risks of wound complications, the likelihood of delayed healing, and the possibility of pigmentation changes in the grafted nipple-areola complex. We elected to transpose the nipple as a full-thickness graft, but consideration also might be given to use of an inferiorly based pedicle flap.     

Textured-surface saline-filled silicone breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty

The earliest silicone breast implants were smooth-surface, silicone rubber devices filled with either silicone gel or saline. Because of persistent problems with capsular contracture, polyurethane-covered silicone implants were developed as an alternative. Particularly in the short run, these alternatives proved highly successful at reducing the incidence of capsular contracture. By 1990, polyurethane-covered implants were rapidly becoming the preferred implant choice of many plastic surgeons, but for legal, regulatory, financial, and safety reasons they were withdrawn from the market by Bristol-Myers in 1991. Meanwhile, during the late 1980s, surface texturing and improved materials became available on other silicone breast implants and expanders. Most studies suggest that textured-surface silicone gel-filled implants, saline-filled implants, and tissue expanders have less frequent capsular contracture than their smooth-surface counterparts.     

The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study

Surgical implantation of breast prostheses for cosmetic purposes has become increasingly popular, and by 1981, it was estimated that three-quarters of a million women had had such an operation. The long-term potential risks, particularly of breast cancer, of such procedures have not been properly investigated. To evaluate the potential breast cancer risk, we have conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3111 women followed through various public and medical records for a total of 18,476 person-years, with a median of 6.2 years per person. The cases of breast cancer were detected by means of a computerized match with the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program, a population-based cancer registry. Overall, 15.7 breast cancer cases were expected and 9 were observed, a nonsignificant deficit [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 57 percent, 95 percent confidence limits: 26 percent, 109 percent]. The cancers were generally diagnosed at an early stage. Among the 573 women aged 40 or older at implantation, 7.1 cases were expected and 8 were observed (SIR = 113 percent). In women whose implants were performed before the age of 40, only 1 case was observed whereas 8.6 cases were expected (SIR = 12 percent, 95 percent confidence limits: 0.3 percent, 65 percent), a significant difference. These data do not support an increased risk of breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty. The low breast cancer rate in women having augmentation mammaplasty at a young age that many such women may have a reduced amount of breast tissue, but data on this are unavailable.     

The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty

This review of the efficacy and safety of breast implants was intended to focus on our current body of knowledge about these devices. There are informational gaps, but not all of these can be laid at the door of imperfect studies or failed scientific methods. Certain properties of the implants are still unmeasurable, immunologic investigation is still evolving, the cause of wound contraction is inexplicable here or in the burnscar contracture, and the indications for and results of this surgery necessarily are subjective. Still, there are a number of investigative avenues open to us, and our cumulative experience shows no reluctance on the part of plastic surgeons to initiate further studies.     

Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty

Subfascial placement of implants was introduced 3 years ago. Collected data reveal very promising short-term and long-term results in comparison with subglandular and subpectoral positioned implants. The clinical experiences of 69 breast augmentations in the subfascial position are reported. The indications for this technique are proposed. The incidence of complications is described from clinical experiences and compared with that for other methods. From January of 1998 through May of 2002, 328 patients underwent periareolar augmentation mammaplasty; 105 patients had a subglandular mammaplasty, 154 patients had a subpectoral mammaplasty, and from August of 1999 through May of 2002, 69 patients had a subfascial augmentation mammaplasty. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 3.6 years in the subglandular group, 3.5 years in the subpectoral group, and 2.9 years in the subfascial group. In comparing the results of the subglandular augmentation group with those of the subpectoral and subfascial augmentation groups, the total rate of complications diminished significantly. The long-term complications of severe capsular contracture, rippling, and nipple sensation and numbness in subglandular augmentation mammaplasty could be significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The subfascial augmentation mammaplasty unites all the advantages of the subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty but eliminates the disadvantages of increased postoperative discomfort and disturbing muscle movement of the breast.     

Evaluating breast parenchymal maldistribution with regard to mastopexy and augmentation mammaplasty

Mammary parenchymal maldistribution or lower-pole hypoplasia, a first cousin of the tubular breast deformity, is a common condition complicating the selection of patients for retropectoral augmentation mammaplasty and/or mastopexy. The eccentric mammary parenchyma must be released from the pectoral fascia to obtain good results with augmentation mammaplasty and to minimize the necessity for mastopexy.     

Surgical thimble for use in augmentation mammaplasty

A conveniently formed thimble has been created for use in dissection during augmentation mammaplasty and gynecomastia operations which forms a rigid extension to the surgeon's finger. With the aid of this instrument, which is fitted onto the third and partly onto the second phalanx of the index finger, the delicacy and maneuverability characteristics of digital dissection are on the whole retained and the surgeon avoids the use of traditional dissection instruments gripped in the hand, with which it is easy to exceed the desired limits of dissection creating nervous lesions and unequal pockets.