Dyneins, autophagy, aggregation and neurodegeneration

We recently showed that the dynein motor machinery plays a role in the delivery of autophagosome contents to lysosomes, in the process of autophagosome-lysosome fusion. This may explain a number of important previous observations, including why intracellular aggregates form in mice with dynein mutations that have motor neuron-like disease. These studies highlight the importance of dyneins and autophagy in the clearance of aggregate-prone proteins in general, and also in the specific case of Huntington's disease. Since many common neurodegenerative diseases are associated with intracellular aggregate formation but the causative variants are unknown, it may be worth considering the possibility of genetic lesions affecting autophagy as contributing factors in such disorders. The importance of dyneins in autophagosome-lysosome fusion provides new insights for the microtubule dependency of autophagy. In this Addendum, we review our findings in the contexts of autophagy and neurodegeneration and consider some of the questions raised.     

Regulation of lysosomal phosphoinositide balance by INPP5E is essential for autophagosome–lysosome fusion

Macroautophagy (autophagy) is a multistep intracellular degradation system. Autophagosomes form, mature, and ultimately fuse with lysosomes, where their sequestered cargo molecules are digested. In contrast to autophagosome formation, our knowledge of autophagosome-lysosome fusion is limited. In a recent study, we identified a novel regulator of autophagy, INPP5E (inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E), which is essential for autophagosome-lysosome fusion. INPP5E primarily functions in neuronal cells, and knockdown of the corresponding gene causes accumulation of autophagosomes by impairing fusion with lysosomes. Some INPP5E molecules localize at the lysosome, and both lysosomal localization and INPP5E enzymatic activity are crucial for autophagy. In addition, INPP5E decreases PtdIns(3,5)P₂ levels on lysosomes, leading to activation of CTTN (cortactin) and stabilization of actin filaments, which are also essential for autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Mutations in INPP5E are causative for Joubert syndrome, a rare brain abnormality, and our results indicate that defects in autophagy play a critical role in pathogenesis.     

The dynein heavy chain family

Dynein is the large molecular motor that translocates to the (-) ends of microtubules. Dynein was first isolated from Tetrahymena cilia four decades ago. The analysis of the primary structure of the dynein heavy chain and the discovery that many organisms express multiple dynein heavy chains have led to two insights. One, dynein, whose motor domain comprises six AAA modules and two potential mechanical levers, generates movement by a mechanism that is fundamentally different than that which underlies the motion of myosin and kinesin. And two, organisms with cilia or flagella express approximately 14 different dynein heavy chain genes, each gene encodes a distinct dynein protein isoform, and each isoform appears to be functionally specialized. Sequence comparisons demonstrate that functionally equivalent isoforms of dynein heavy chains are well conserved across species. Alignments of portions of the motor domain result in seven clusters: (i) cytoplasmic dynein Dyhl; (ii) cytoplasmic dynein Dyh2; (iii) axonemal outer arm dynein alpha; (iv) outer arm dyneins beta and gamma; (v) inner arm dynein 1alpha; (vi) inner arm dynein 1beta; and (vii) a group of apparently single-headed inner arm dyneins. Some of the dynein groups contained more than one representative from a single organism, suggesting that these may be tissue-specific variants.     

Clockwise translocation of microtubules by flagellar inner-arm dyneins in vitro

Cilia and flagella are equipped with multiple species of dyneins that have diverse motor properties. To assess the properties of various axonemal dyneins of Chlamydomonas, in vitro microtubule translocation by isolated dyneins was examined with and without flow of the medium. With one inner-arm dynein species, dynein c, most microtubules became aligned parallel to the flow and translocated downstream after the onset of flow. When the flow was stopped, the gliding direction was gradually randomized. In contrast, with inner-arm dyneins d and g, microtubules tended to translocate at a shallow right angle to the flow. When the flow was stopped, each microtubule turned to the right, making a curved track. The clockwise translocation was not accompanied by lateral displacement, indicating that these dyneins generate torque that bends the microtubule. The torque generated by these dyneins in the axoneme may modulate the relative orientation between adjacent doublet microtubules and lead to more efficient functioning of total dyneins.     

BORC coordinates encounter and fusion of lysosomes with autophagosomes

Whereas the mechanisms involved in autophagosome formation have been extensively studied for the past 2 decades, those responsible for autophagosome-lysosome fusion have only recently begun to garner attention. In this study, we report that the multisubunit BORC complex, previously implicated in kinesin-dependent movement of lysosomes toward the cell periphery, is required for efficient autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Knockout (KO) of BORC subunits causes not only juxtanuclear clustering of lysosomes, but also increased levels of the autophagy protein LC3B-II and the receptor SQSTM1. Increases in LC3B-II occur without changes in basal MTORC1 activity and autophagy initiation. Instead, LC3B-II accumulation largely results from decreased lysosomal degradation. Further experiments show that BORC KO impairs both the encounter and fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. Reduced encounters result from an inability of lysosomes to move toward the peripheral cytoplasm, where many autophagosomes are formed. However, BORC KO also reduces the recruitment of the HOPS tethering complex to lysosomes and assembly of the STX17-VAMP8-SNAP29 trans-SNARE complex involved in autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Through these dual roles, BORC integrates the kinesin-dependent movement of lysosomes toward autophagosomes with HOPS-dependent autophagosome-lysosome fusion. These findings reveal a requirement for lysosome dispersal in autophagy that is independent of changes in MTORC1 signaling, and identify BORC as a novel regulator of autophagosome-lysosome fusion.     

Nucleotide specificity of the enzymatic and motile activities of dynein, kinesin, and heavy meromyosin

The substrate specificities of dynein, kinesin, and myosin substrate turnover activity and cytoskeletal filament-driven translocation were examined using 15 ATP analogues. The dyneins were more selective in their substrate utilization than bovine brain kinesin or muscle heavy meromyosin, and even different types of dyneins, such as 14S and 22S dynein from Tetrahymena cilia and the beta-heavy chain-containing particle from the outer-arm dynein of sea urchin flagella, could be distinguished by their substrate specificities. Although bovine brain kinesin and muscle heavy meromyosin both exhibited broad substrate specificities, kinesin-induced microtubule translocation varied over a 50-fold range in speed among the various substrates, whereas heavy meromyosin-induced actin translocation varied only by fourfold. With both kinesin and heavy meromyosin, the relative velocities of filament translocation did not correlate well with the relative filament-activated substrate turnover rates. Furthermore, some ATP analogues that did not support the filament translocation exhibited filament-activated substrate turnover rates. Filament-activated substrate turnover and power production, therefore, appear to become uncoupled with certain substrates. In conclusion, the substrate specificities and coupling to motility are distinct for different types of molecular motor proteins. Such nucleotide "fingerprints" of enzymatic activities of motor proteins may prove useful as a tool for identifying what type of motor is involved in powering a motility-related event that can be reconstituted in vitro.     

Autophagosome-lysosome fusion depends on the pH in acidic compartments in CHO cells

Autophagy is the bulk degradation of cytoplasmic constituents in response to starvation and other environmental or intracellular cues. During this process, most of the cytoplasm is sequestered into autophagosomes, which then fuse with lysosomes where the degradation of the sequestered material proceeds. We investigated the relationship between autophagosome-lysosome fusion and the pH in acidic compartments by visualizing the fusion process using fluorescence in CHO cells. In this experiment, mitochondria were labeled with GFP by transfecting CHO cells with the presequence of ornithine transcarbamylase, and lysosomes were labeled with Texas Red Dextran; any fusion was identified by the colocalization of mitochondria (in autophagosomes) and lysosomes using fluorescence microscopy. When CHO cells were treated with rapamycin or starvation medium to induce autophagy, the colocalization of fluorescence was observed. Whereas when they were treated with 3-MA, an inhibitor of autophagy, the colocalization disappeared. We conclude that the colocalization reflects the fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes. Moreover, when the CHO cells were treated with drugs that increase the pH of acidic compartments, the colocalization disappeared. This suggests that the autophagosome-lysosome fusion is inhibited by increasing pH in acidic compartments independently of V-ATPase activity in CHO cells.     

Directional instability of microtubule transport in the presence of kinesin and dynein, two opposite polarity motor proteins

Kinesin and dynein are motor proteins that move in opposite directions along microtubules. In this study, we examine the consequences of having kinesin and dynein (ciliary outer arm or cytoplasmic) bound to glass surfaces interacting with the same microtubule in vitro. Although one might expect a balance of opposing forces to produce little or no net movement, we find instead that microtubules move unidirectionally for several microns (corresponding to hundreds of ATPase cycles by a motor) but continually switch between kinesin-directed and dynein-directed transport. The velocities in the plus-end (0.2-0.3 microns/s) and minus-end (3.5-4 microns/s) directions were approximately half those produced by kinesin (0.5 microns/s) and ciliary dynein (6.7 microns/s) alone, indicating that the motors not contributing to movement can interact with and impose a drag upon the microtubule. By comparing two dyneins with different duty ratios (percentage of time spent in a strongly bound state during the ATPase cycle) and varying the nucleotide conditions, we show that the microtubule attachment times of the two opposing motors as well as their relative numbers determine which motor predominates in this assay. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which kinesin-induced movement of a microtubule induces a negative strain in attached dyneins which causes them to dissociate before entering a force-generating state (and vice versa); reversals in the direction of transport may require the temporary dissociation of the transporting motor from the microtubule. The bidirectional movements described here are also remarkably similar to the back-and-forth movements of chromosomes during mitosis and membrane vesicles in fibroblasts. These results suggest that the underlying mechanical properties of motor proteins, at least in part, may be responsible for reversals in microtubule-based transport observed in cells.     

Dyneins across eukaryotes: a comparative genomic analysis

Dyneins are large minus-end-directed microtubule motors. Each dynein contains at least one dynein heavy chain (DHC) and a variable number of intermediate chains (IC), light intermediate chains (LIC) and light chains (LC). Here, we used genome sequence data from 24 diverse eukaryotes to assess the distribution of DHCs, ICs, LICs and LCs across Eukaryota. Phylogenetic inference identified nine DHC families (two cytoplasmic and seven axonemal) and six IC families (one cytoplasmic). We confirm that dyneins have been lost from higher plants and show that this is most likely because of a single loss of cytoplasmic dynein 1 from the ancestor of Rhodophyta and Viridiplantae, followed by lineage-specific losses of other families. Independent losses in Entamoeba mean that at least three extant eukaryotic lineages are entirely devoid of dyneins. Cytoplasmic dynein 2 is associated with intraflagellar transport (IFT), but in two chromalveolate organisms, we find an IFT footprint without the retrograde motor. The distribution of one family of outer-arm dyneins accounts for 2-headed or 3-headed outer-arm ultrastructures observed in different organisms. One diatom species builds motile axonemes without any inner-arm dyneins (IAD), and the unexpected conservation of IAD I1 in non-flagellate algae and LC8 (DYNLL1/2) in all lineages reveals a surprising fluidity to dynein function.     

Computer simulation of flagellar movement: VII. Conventional but functionally different cross-bridge models for inner and outer arm dyneins can explain the effects of outer arm dynein removal

Outer arm dynein removal from flagella by genetic or chemical methods causes decreased frequency and power, but little change in bending pattern. These results suggest that outer arm dynein operates within bends to increase the speed of bend propagation, but does not produce forces that alter the bending pattern established by inner arm dyneins. A flagellar model incorporating different cross-bridge models for inner and outer arm dyneins has been examined. The inner arm dynein model has a hyperbolic force-velocity curve, with a maximum average force at 0 sliding velocity of about 14 pN for each 96 nm group of inner arm dyneins. The outer arm dynein model has a very different force-velocity curve, with a maximum force at about 10-15% of V(max). The outer arm dynein model is adjusted so that the unloaded sliding velocity for a realistic mixture of inner and outer arm dyneins is twice the unloaded sliding velocity for the inner arm dynein model alone. With these cross-bridge models, a flagellar model can be obtained that reduces its sliding velocity and frequency by approximately 50% when outer arm dyneins are removed, with little change in bending pattern. The addition of outer arm dyneins, therefore, gives an approximately 4-fold increase in power output against viscous resistances, and outer arm dyneins may generate 90% or more of the power output. Cell Motil.     

Defective recruitment of motor proteins to autophagic compartments contributes to autophagic failure in aging

Inability to preserve proteostasis with age contributes to the gradual loss of function that characterizes old organisms. Defective autophagy, a component of the proteostasis network for delivery and degradation of intracellular materials in lysosomes, has been described in multiple old organisms, while a robust autophagy response has been linked to longevity. The molecular mechanisms responsible for defective autophagic function with age remain, for the most part, poorly characterized. In this work, we have identified differences between young and old cells in the intracellular trafficking of the vesicular compartments that participate in autophagy. Failure to reposition autophagosomes and lysosomes toward the perinuclear region with age reduces the efficiency of their fusion and the subsequent degradation of the sequestered cargo. Hepatocytes from old mice display lower association of two microtubule‐based minus‐end‐directed motor proteins, the well‐characterized dynein, and the less‐studied KIFC3, with autophagosomes and lysosomes, respectively. Using genetic approaches to mimic the lower levels of KIFC3 observed in old cells, we confirmed that reduced content of this motor protein in fibroblasts leads to failed lysosomal repositioning and diminished autophagic flux. Our study connects defects in intracellular trafficking with insufficient autophagy in old organisms and identifies motor proteins as a novel target for future interventions aiming at correcting autophagic activity with anti‐aging purposes.     

Autoinhibitory and other autoregulatory elements within the dynein motor domain

The dyneins are a family of microtubule motor proteins. The motor domain, which represents the C-terminal 2/3 of the dynein heavy chain, exhibits homology to the AAA family of ATPases. It consists of a ring of six related but divergent AAA+ units, with two substantial sized protruding projections, the stem, or tail, which anchors the protein to diverse subcellular sites, and the stalk, which binds microtubules. This article reviews recent efforts to probe the mechanism by which the dyneins produce force, and work from the authors' lab regarding long-range conformational regulation of dynein enzymatic activity.     

Building complexity: an in vitro study of cytoplasmic dynein with in vivo implications

BACKGROUND: Cytoplasmic dynein is the molecular motor responsible for most retrograde microtubule-based vesicular transport. In vitro single-molecule experiments suggest that dynein function is not as robust as that of kinesin-1 or myosin-V because dynein moves only a limited distance (approximately 800 nm) before detaching and can exert a modest (approximately 1 pN) force. However, dynein-driven cargos in vivo move robustly over many microns and exert forces of multiple pN. To determine how to go from limited single-molecule function to robust in vivo transport, we began to build complexity in a controlled manner by using in vitro experiments. RESULTS: We show that a single cytoplasmic dynein motor frequently transitions into an off-pathway unproductive state that impairs net transport. Addition of a second (and/or third) dynein motor, so that cargos are moved by two (or three) motors rather than one, is sufficient to recover several properties of in vivo motion; such properties include long cargo travels, robust motion, and increased forces. Part of this improvement appears to arise from selective suppression of the unproductive state of dynein rather than from a fundamental change in dynein's mechanochemical cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple dyneins working together suppress shortcomings of a single motor and generate robust motion under in vitro conditions. There appears to be no need for additional cofactors (e.g., dynactin) for this improvement. Because cargos are often driven by multiple dyneins in vivo, our results show that changing the number of dynein motors could allow modulation of dynein function from the mediocre single-dynein limit to robust in vivo-like dynein-driven motion.     

Modulation of cytoplasmic dynein ATPase activity by the accessory subunits

The microtubule-based motor molecule cytoplasmic dynein has been proposed to be regulated by a variety of mechanisms, including phosphorylation and specific interaction with the organelle-associated complex, dynactin. In this study, we examined whether the intermediate chain subunits of cytoplasmic dynein are involved in modulation of ATP hydrolysis, and thereby affect motility. Treatment of testis cytoplasmic dynein under hypertonic salt conditions resulted in separation of the intermediate chains from the remainder of the dynein molecule, and led to a 4-fold enhancement of ATP hydrolysis. This result suggests that the accessory subunits act as negative regulators of dynein heavy chain activity. Comparison of ATPase activities of dyneins with differing intermediate chain isoforms showed significant differences in basal ATP hydrolysis rates, with testis dynein 7-fold more active than dynein from brain. Removal of the intermediate chain subunits led to an equalization of ATPase activity between brain and testis dyneins, suggesting that the accessory subunits are responsible for the observed differences in tissue activity. Finally, our preparative procedures have allowed for the identification and purification of a 1:1 complex of dynein with dynactin. As this interaction is presumed to be mediated by the dynein intermediate chain subunits, we now have defined experimental conditions for further exploration of dynein enzymatic and motility regulation.     

The role of the dynein stalk in cytoplasmic and flagellar motility

We have recently identified a microtubule binding domain within the motor protein cytoplasmic dynein. This domain is situated at the end of a slender 10–12 nm projection which corresponds to the stalks previously observed extending from the heads of both axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The stalks also correspond to the B-links observed to connect outer arm axonemal dyneins to the B-microtubules in flagella and constitute the microtubule attachment sites during dynein motility. The stalks contrast strikingly with the polymer attachment domains of the kinesins and myosins which are found on the surface of the motor head. The difference in dynein's structural design raises intriguing questions as to how the stalk functions in force production along microtubules. In this article, we attempt to integrate the myriad of biochemical and EM structural data that has been previously collected regarding dynein with recent molecular findings, in an effort to begin to understand the mechanism of dynein motility. Received: 13 March 1998 / Revised version: 17 April 1998 / Accepted: 17 April 1998     

Ciliary motility: the components and cytoplasmic preassembly mechanisms of the axonemal dyneins

Motile cilia and flagella are organelles, which function in cell motility and in the transport of fluids over the surface of cells. Motility defects often result in a rare human disease, primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Cell motility depends on axonemal dynein, a molecular motor that drives the beating of cilia and flagella. The dyneins are composed of multiple subunits, which are thought to be preassembled in the cytoplasm before they are transported into cilia and flagella. Axonemal dyneins have been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas. In addition, analyses of human PCDs over the past decade, together with studies in other model animals, have identified the conserved components required for dynein assembly. Recently also, the first cytoplasmic component of dynein assembly, kintoun (ktu), was elucidated through the analysis of a medaka mutant in combination with human genetics and cell biology and biochemical studies of Chlamydomonas. The components of dynein and the proteins involved in its cytoplasmic assembly process are discussed.     

Preparation of microtubules from rat liver and testis: cytoplasmic dynein is a major microtubule associated protein

A microtubule associated protein from brain tissue (MAP 1C), has been found to possess many properties in common with ciliary and flagellar dyneins (Paschal et al.:J. Cell Biol. 105:1273-1282, 1987). However, this protein, now designated as cytoplasmic dynein, exhibited several properties which distinguish it from axonemal forms of the enzyme. We have investigated these characteristics further in a study of cytoplasmic dyneins from non-neuronal tissues. Rat liver and testis in particular were found to contain high levels of cytoplasmic dynein. The yield of dynein from testis was over 70 micrograms/g of tissue, making this the best source of cytoplasmic dynein of all tissues so far examined. The characterization of dynein from these sources has confirmed and extended our previous observations concerning the unique properties of cytoplasmic dynein. Activation of liver and testis dynein occurred at low (less than 1 mg/ml) tubulin concentration. Polypeptides identified as subunits of brain cytoplasmic dynein (74, 59, 57, 55, and 53 kDa) were present in liver and testis preparations. In addition, polypeptides at 150 and 45 kDa were found to copurify with the non-neuronal dyneins. The liver and testis enzyme hydrolyzed pyrimidine nucleotides at rates up to 12.5 times faster than ATP, though the relative affinity of cytoplasmic dynein for CTP was much lower (Km = 1.0 mM) than that for ATP. The properties of the testis enzyme were consistent with its identification as a cytoplasmic dynein rather than a sperm axonemal precursor. These data indicate that cytoplasmic dyneins may be widespread in distribution and that they share certain biochemical properties unique from those of axonemal dyneins. These characteristics are consistent with the proposal that cytoplasmic dynein plays a universal role in retrograde organelle motility.     

Structural-functional relationships of the dynein,spokes, and central-pair projections predicted from an analysis of the forces acting within a flagellum

In the axoneme of eukaryotic flagella the dynein motor proteins form crossbridges between the outer doublet microtubules. These motor proteins generate force that accumulates as linear tension, or compression, on the doublets. When tension or compression is present on a curved microtubule, a force per unit length develops in the plane of bending and is transverse to the long axis of the microtubule. This transverse force (t-force) is evaluated here using available experimental evidence from sea urchin sperm and bull sperm. At or near the switch point for beat reversal, the t-force is in the range of 0.25-1.0 nN/ micro m, with 0.5 nN/ micro m the most likely value. This is the case in both beating and arrested bull sperm and in beating sea urchin sperm. The total force that can be generated (or resisted) by all the dyneins on one micron of outer doublet is also approximately 0.5 nN. The equivalence of the maximum dynein force/ micro m and t-force/ micro m at the switch point may have important consequences. Firstly, the t-force acting on the doublets near the switch point of the flagellar beat is sufficiently strong that it could terminate the action of the dyneins directly by strongly favoring the detached state and precipitating a cascade of detachment from the adjacent doublet. Secondly, after dynein release occurs, the radial spokes and central-pair apparatus are the structures that must carry the t-force. The spokes attached to the central-pair projections will bear most of the load. The central-pair projections are well-positioned for this role, and they are suitably configured to regulate the amount of axoneme distortion that occurs during switching. However, to fulfill this role without preventing flagellar bend formation, moveable attachments that behave like processive motor proteins must mediate the attachment between the spoke heads and the central-pair structure.