Effects of acute and chronic methylphenidate administration on beta-endorphin, growth hormone, prolactin and cortisol in children with attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity

The effect of 5 mg/p.o. methylphenidate (MPH) challenge on beta-endorphin (beta-EP), growth hormone (GH), prolactin (Prl) and cortisol was investigated in 16 children suffering from attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) before and after 4 weeks MPH treatment. The study population consisted of 13 males and 3 females aged 6-11 years. All patients were drug free for at least 3 months prior to investigation. The severity of ADDH symptomatology and response to MPH chronic treatment was assessed using parent/teacher abbreviated Conners rating scale. Blood samples for beta-EP, cortisol, Prl and GH were drawn before initiation of treatment (basal pre-treatment level), 2 hours after MPH challenge, 4 weeks after MPH treatment (basal post-treatment level) and 2 hours after re-challenge with MPH. Chronic MPH treatment resulted in a decrease in basal Prl levels (5.5 +/- 2.8 vs 3.7 +/- 1.9 ng/ml; p less than 0.05). Pre-treatment challenge stimulates significantly both beta-EP (15.0 +/- 7.5 vs 12.5 +/- 5.3 pmol/l; p less than 0.05) and cortisol secretion (20.6 +/- 6.6 vs 12.6 +/- 5.8 micrograms/dl; p less than 0.05), and suppressed Prl secretion (4.0 +/- 1.5 vs 5.5 +/- 2.8 ng/ml; p less than 0.05). Re-challenge with MPH enhanced beta-EP levels (14.9 +/- 8.6 vs 10.6 +/- 5.0 pmol/l; p less than 0.05) but failed to affect cortisol, Prl and GH secretion. The acute and chronic neuroendocrine effects of MPH administration might be related to its dopaminergic and adrenergic agonistic activity. It might be that the stimulatory effect of single and repeated acute MPH administration on beta-EP release contributes to the beneficial effect of MPH treatment in ADDH children.     

Effect of growth hormone-releasing factor on plasma growth hormone, prolactin and somatomedin C in hypopituitary and short normal children

We studied the effect of a single intravenous bolus of 0.5 microgram/kg of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) on plasma GH, prolactin (PRL) and somatomedin C (SMC) in 12 short normal children and 24 patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD), i.e. GH less than 5 ng/ml after insulin and glucagon tolerance tests. GRF elicited an increase in plasma GH in both short normal and GHD children. The mean GH peak was lower in the GHD than in the short normal children (8.2 +/- 2.5 vs. 39.2 +/- 5.1 ng/ml, p less than 0.001). In the GHD patients (but not in the short normals) there was a negative correlation between bone age and peak GH after GRF (r = -0.58, p less than 0.005); GH peaks within the normal range were seen in 5 out of 8 GHD children with a bone age less than 5 years. In the short normal children, GRF had no effect on plasma PRL, which decreased continuously between 8.30 and 11 a.m. (from 206 +/- 22 to 86 +/- 10 microU/ml, p less than 0.005), a reflection of its circadian rhythm. In the majority of the GHD patients, PRL levels were higher than in the short normal children but had the same circadian rhythm, except that a slight increase in PRL was observed 15 min after GRF; this increase in PRL was seen both in children with isolated GHD and in those with multiple hormone deficiencies; it did occur in some GHD patients who had no GH response to GRF. Serum SMC did not change 24 h after GRF in the short normal children. We conclude that: (1) in short normal children: (a) the mean GH response to a single intravenous bolus of 0.5 microgram/kg of GRF is similar to that reported in young adults and (b) GRF has no effect on PRL secretion; (2) in GHD patients: (a) normal GH responses to GRF are seen in patients with a bone age less than 5 years and establish the integrity of the somatotrophs in those cases; (b) the GH responsiveness to GRF decreases with age, which probably reflects the duration of endogenous GRF deficiency, and (c) although the PRL response to GRF is heterogeneous, it does in some patients provide additional evidence of responsive pituitary tissue.     

Psychological distress, depression and prolactin response in stressed persons

We examined the relationship of psychological distress to serum prolactin response in 54 persons who had lost a spouse or were threatened with a loss. We found that our two measures of psychological distress, both separation anxiety and depression, were directly correlated with prolactin response during a stressful interview (p less than .05). When we stratified the sample first by depression score and then by separation anxiety, we found a positive correlation between separation anxiety and prolactin response only in the highly depressed half of the sample (r = .32) and a positive correlation between depression and prolactin response only in the highest quartile of intensity for separation anxiety (r = .49, p less than .05). This suggested that both depression and separation anxiety, each in conjunction with high levels of the other but not independently, rendered the individual under stress more physiologically sensitive to distressing challenges such as a stressful interview. Alternatively, it was global distress above a certain threshold that was associated with degree of physiological response.     

Factors influencing the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors influencing the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in idiopathic GH deficiency. METHODS: 28 patients aged 4.9 +/- 0.7 years with certain GH deficiency were given GHRH (2 microg/kg). RESULTS: The GH peak after GHRH was correlated negatively with age at evaluation (r = -0.37, p < 0.05) and body mass index (r = -0.44, p = 0.02), and positively with anterior pituitary height (r = 0.47, p = 0.02), GH peak after non-GHRH stimulation (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and spontaneous GH peak (r = 0.82, p = 0.007). It was lower in the patients aged >5 years than in the youngest (p = 0.04), but it was similar in the patients with and without features suggesting a hypothalamic origin. CONCLUSION: The GH response to GHRH test cannot be used to differentiate between hypothalamic and pituitary forms of idiopathic GH deficiency, probably because the GH response decreases after the first 5 years of life, whatever the origin of the deficiency.     

Pyridostigmine enhances even if it does not normalize the growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with Cushing's disease.

Subjects with Cushing's disease have diminished growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). The aim of our study was to investigate the underlying mechanism of this diminished GH response in these patients using pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, which is reported to increase GH secretion by reducing somatostatin tone. Eight subjects with untreated Cushing's disease (caused by a pituitary adenoma) and 6 control subjects received GHRH 100 micrograms in 1 ml of saline, as intravenous bolus injection 60 min after (1) placebo (2 tablets, p.o.) or (2) PD (120 mg, p.o.). After GHRH plus placebo, the GH peak (mean +/- SEM) was significantly lower in subjects with Cushing's disease (2.4 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) compared to control subjects (25.1 +/- 1.8 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05). After GHRH plus PD, the GH peak was significantly enhanced both in subjects with Cushing's disease (7.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05) and in control subjects (42.3 +/- 4.3 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05). In patients with Cushing's disease, the GH response to GHRH plus PD was lower with respect to the GH response to GHRH alone in normal subjects. We conclude that hypercortisolism may cause a decrease in central cholinergic tone which is in turn hypothesized to be responsible of an enhanced somatostatin release from the hypothalamus. However, other metabolic or central nervous system alterations may act synergistically with hypercortisolism in causing GH inhibition in patients with Cushing's disease.     

Robust growth hormone (GH) secretion in aged female rats co-administered GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)

Aging is associated with a blunted growth hormone (GH) secretory response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), in vivo. The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of aging on the GH secretory response to GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6), a synthetic GH secretagogue. GHRP-6 (30 micrograms/kg) was administered alone or in combination with GHRH (2 micrograms/kg) to anesthetized female Fischer 344 rats, 3 or 19 months of age. The peptides were co-administered to determine the effect of aging upon the potentiating effect of GHRP-6 on GHRH activity. The increase in plasma GH as a function of time following administration of GHRP-6 was lower (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats; whereas the increase in plasma GH secretion as a function of time following co-administration of GHRP-6 and GHRH was higher (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats (mean Cmax = 8539 +/- 790.6 micrograms/l vs. 2970 +/- 866 micrograms/l, respectively; p less than 0.01). Since pituitary GH concentrations in old rats were lower than in young rats (257.0 +/- 59.8 micrograms/mg wet wt. vs. 639.7 +/- 149.2 micrograms/mg wet wt., respectively; p less than 0.03), the results suggested that GH functional reserve in old female rats was not linked to pituitary GH concentration. The differential responses of old rats to individually administered and co-administered GHRP-6 are important because they demonstrate that robust and immediate GH secretion can occur in old rats that are appropriately stimulated. The data further suggest that the cellular processes subserving GH secretion are intact in old rats, and that age-related decrements in GH secretion result from inadequate stimulation, rather than to maladaptive changes in the mechanism of GH release.     

Growth hormone responses to sleep, insulin hypoglycaemia and arginine infusion

This study compares the peak serum growth hormone (GH) concentration during slow wave sleep with the serum GH responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia and intravenous arginine infusion in 23 children referred because of short stature (20) or precocious puberty (3). Peak serum GH concentration during sleep correlated significantly with peak GH response to insulin hypoglycaemia (r = 0.64, p less than 0.01) and arginine infusion (r = 0.57, p less than 0.01). 3 children had subnormal (less than 15 mU/l) peak serum GH concentrations during sleep but normal responses to either insulin-induced hypoglycaemia or intravenous arginine infusion. 1 child had a normal peak serum GH response to sleep but subnormal responses to insulin and arginine. Sleep studies of GH secretion may be indicated when the GH responses to pharmacological stimuli are inconsistent with the observed growth pattern.     

Anabolic growth hormone action improves submaximal measures of physical performance in patients with HIV-associated wasting

Growth hormone (GH) treatment reverses the muscle loss allegedly responsible for diminished aerobic capacity and increased fatigue in patients with HIV-associated wasting. This study examined whether submaximal measures of physical performance can be used as objective measures of the functional impact of GH treatment-induced anabolism. We randomized 27 HIV-positive men [mean (SD) age, 43.9 (7.2) yr; body mass, 71.9 (10.4) kg; BMI, 23.1 (2.8) kg/m2] with unintentional weight loss despite antiretroviral therapy to receive GH (6 mg) or placebo in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial with a 3-mo washout. Lean body mass (LBM), maximum oxygen uptake (Vo2 peak), ventilatory threshold (VeT), 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance and work, profile of mood states (POMS) fatigue and vigor scores, and Nottingham health profile (NHP) energy and physical mobility scores were measured. LBM significantly increased after 3 mo of GH treatment vs. placebo (means +/- SE, 3.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.4 kg; P < 0.001). VeT significantly improved (17.6 +/- 3.7 vs. -5.9 +/- 2.5%; P < 0.001), but Vo2 peak did not change significantly. 6MWT distance improved (24.9 +/- 9.7 vs. 19.9 +/- 11.6 m; P > 0.05) and 6MWT work increased significantly more after 3 mo of GH treatment (33.3 +/- 8.8 vs. 16.5 +/- 7.5 kJ; P < 0.05). POMS scores of fatigue and vigor and the NHP score of energy improved, yet the changes were not statistically significant. GH treatment improved VeT linearly to the increase in LBM (r =0.43, P = 0.037) and 6MWT work (r = 0.51, P = 0.008), and the increase in 6MWT work correlated with increase in LBM (r = 0.45, P = 0.024). Improvement in 6MWT work above the median (27.3 kJ) showed a decrease in fatigue (r = -0.62, P = 0.024). We concluded that GH treatment-induced LBM gains in HIV-associated wasting were functionally relevant, as determined by effort-independent submaximal measures of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.     

Evidence for direct inhibitory effects of dopamine on zona glomerulosa secretion of 18-hydroxycorticosterone in rhesus monkeys

This study was designed to more selectively investigate the dopaminergic regulation of 18-hydroxycorticosterone (18-OHB) and aldosterone production by the adrenal zona glomerulosa. Mature rhesus monkeys received either an infusion of dopamine (2 micrograms/kg/min) or 5% dextrose (0.2 ml/min) over a 60 min period (N=6). Dopamine had no effect on plasma levels of renin activity, cortisol, corticosterone, aldosterone or blood pressure. However, dopamine suppressed (p less than 0.05) plasma 18-OHB levels from a baseline of 31.6 +/- 3.5 ng/dl to 23.6 +/- 2.1 ng/dl at 60 min after onset of infusion. This observation is in agreement with some studies in humans but differs from others in which no depression in 18-OHB was observed following dopamine infusion. Dopamine infusion markedly (p less than 0.001) suppressed plasma PRL levels by 30 min after onset of infusion. Corticosteroid responses to metoclopramide (200 micrograms/kg) after dexamethasone 1 mg im every 6 h X 5 days or placebo treatment (vehicle im every 6 h X 5 days) was then evaluated. Dexamethasone significantly suppressed basal cortisol, corticosterone, 18-OHB and aldosterone. Although dexamethasone blunted the prolactin response, it did not inhibit the aldosterone response to metoclopramide. The 18-OHB response to metoclopramide was increased (p less than 0.01) following dexamethasone treatment. Following dexamethasone suppression, 18-OHB levels were still lowered (p less than 0.05) by dopamine infusion. These results suggest that dopamine selectively inhibits zona glomerulosa production of 18-OHB and aldosterone in rhesus monkeys.     

Growth hormone response of bull calves to growth hormone-releasing factor

Three experiments were conducted to determine serum growth hormone (GH) response of bull calves (N = 4; 83 kg body wt) to iv injections and infusions of human pancreatic GH-releasing factor 1-40-OH (hpGRF). Peak GH responses to 0, 2.5, 10, and 40 micrograms hpGRF/100 kg body wt were 7 +/- 3, 8 +/- 3, 18 +/- 7, and 107 +/- 55 (mean peak height +/- SEM) ng/ml serum, respectively. Only the response to the 40-microgram dose was greater (P less than 0.05) than the 0-microgram dose. Concentrations of prolactin in serum were not affected by hpGRF treatment. In calves injected with hpGRF (20 micrograms/100 kg body wt) at 6-hr intervals for 48 hr, GH increased from a mean preinjection value of 3.1 ng/ml serum to a mean peak response value of 70 ng/ml serum. Differences in peak GH response between times of injection existed within individual calves (e.g., 10.5 ng/ml vs 184.5 ng/ml serum). Concentrations of GH in calves infused continuously with either 0 or 200 micrograms hpGRF/hr for 6 hr averaged 7.4 +/- 3 and 36.5 +/- 11 ng/ml serum, respectively (P less than 0.05). Concentrations of GH oscillated markedly in hpGRF-infused calves, but oscillations were asynchronous among calves. We conclude that GH response of bull calves to hpGRF is dose dependent and that repeated injections or continuous infusions of hpGRF elicit GH release, although magnitude of response varies considerably. We hypothesize that differences in GH response to hpGRF within and among calves, and pulsatile secretion in the face of hpGRF infusion may be related to the degree of synchrony among exogenous hpGRF and endogenous GRF and somatostatin.     

TRH-Gly, a precursor of TRH, alters GH secretion in acromegaly

We explored effects of a precursor of thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone (TRH), TRH-Gly, on growth hormone (GH) secretion in acromegaly. Intravenous injection of TRH-Gly produced a profound increase in GH secretion in eight, decrease in two, and no response in five out of a total fifteen patients. The magnitude of GH responsiveness to TRH-Gly was significantly correlated with that induced by TRH (r = 0.824, P less than 0.01). In contrast, TRH-Gly did not induce secretion of TSH or prolactin. The present data suggest that TRH-Gly may participate in regulating GH secretion in some patients with acromegaly and that TRH-Gly-induced GH secretion may be due at least in part to TRH-associated mechanisms underlying GH secretion.     

Spontaneous growth hormone secretion and plasma somatomedin-C in children of short stature

We studied 17 short prepubertal children, aged 7.5 to 17.0 years (mean +/- SD: 11.7 +/- 2.4) more than 2.0 SD below the mean height for their age and of delayed bone age (M +/- SD: 8.1 +/- 2.3), to clarify their physiological GH secretory status. The mean concentration of GH (MCGH) was calculated and was compared with the subjects' GH responses to insulin and arginine tolerance tests (IATT) and plasma somatomedin-C (SM-C). The mean 24-h MCGH value was 3.2 +/- 1.3 ng/ml (range 1.6-5.5). The mean peak GH response to the IATT was 13.0 +/- 7.5 ng/ml (range 2.4-33.9). In addition to the two patients with abnormally low GH responses to the IATT, seven with normal responses showed low 24-h MCGH values, a small number of GH pulses and low mean GH amplitude. The mean plasma SM-C in all patients was 0.60 +/- 0.20 U/ml. This was significantly lower than that of age-matched children of normal height (p less than 0.001). The 24-h MCGH was significantly correlated with plasma SM-C levels (r = 0.51, p less than 0.05) and with that of the first three hours of sleep at night (r = 0.84, p less than 0.01). These results indicate that: 1) some short children with normal GH response to pharmacological tests secrete a low amount of GH physiologically and 2) blood sampling during the first three hours of sleep as well as 24-hour sampling is suitable in evaluating the physiological secretion of GH.     

Growth hormone response to human pancreatic growth hormone releasing factor in cattle

The effects of a growth hormone releasing factor, human pancreatic growth hormone releasing factor-44 (hpGRF-44), on growth hormone (GH) secretion in calves, heifers and cows were studied. A single intravenous (iv) injection of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 or 1.0 microgram of synthetic hpGRF-44 per kg of body weight (bw) in calves significantly elevated the circulating GH level within 2-5 min, while no increase in plasma GH was observed in saline injected control calves. The plasma GH level increased proportionally to the log dose of hpGRF-44, and reached a peak at 5-10 min (p less than 0.01). Subcutaneous injection of hpGRF-44 also elevated the plasma GH level, but the peak value at 15 min was 37% of that of iv injection (p less than 0.05). Intravenous injection of 0.25 microgram of hpGRF-44 per kg of bw to female calves, heifers, and cows significantly elevated mean the GH levels from 8.5, 2.3, and 1.6 ng/ml at 0 time to peak values of 97, 26, and 11.6 ng/ml, respectively (p less than 0.01). The plasma GH response and basal level in calves were significantly higher than those of heifers or cows (p less than 0.025). The plasma GH response to hpGRF-44 as well as the basal level decreased with advancing age. The plasma GH response to hpGRF-44 and basal GH in male calves were significantly greater than those in female calves (p less than 0.001). These results indicate that synthetic hpGRF-44 is a potent secretogogue for bovine GH, and suggest its usefulness in the assessment of GH secretion and reserve in cattle.     

Ghrelin is suppressed by glucagon and does not mediate glucagon-related growth hormone release

BACKGROUND: Glucagon stimulation is routinely used as a provocative test to assess growth hormone (GH) sufficiency in pediatrics. Ghrelin also markedly stimulates GH secretion. Because glucagon stimulates the promoter of the ghrelin gene in vitro as well as ghrelin secretion by the perfused rat stomach, we sought to determine whether ghrelin mediates glucagon-induced GH secretion. METHODS: We compared ghrelin, GH, insulin and glucose responses following administration of 0.03 mg/kg intravenously (iv; max. 1 mg) and 0.1 mg/kg intramuscularly (im; max. 2 mg) of glucagon in two groups (n = 10-11/group) of GH-sufficient children. We also measured ghrelin before and 6 min after iv administration of 1 mg glucagon in 21 adult subjects. RESULTS: In children, glucagon caused a 26% decrease in ghrelin and a 72% increase in glucose concentrations that were independent of the dose or administration route of glucagon. In contrast, the insulin response was 2-3 times higher following administration of 0.1 mg/kg im compared to 0.03 mg/kg of glucagon iv. There was a significant correlation between the maximum decrease in ghrelin and increases in glucose (p = 0.03) but not in insulin. There was a significant correlation between ghrelin and GH area under the curve after controlling for the dose of glucagon (p = 0.03) but not for the maximum increase in glucose.In normal adults, glucagon administration caused a 7% decrease in ghrelin concentrations after 6 min (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Ghrelin does not play a causal role in the GH response to pharmacological glucagon administration, which suppresses ghrelin levels starting a few minutes after injection.     

Study of insulin-like growth factor I in human obesity.

In obesity there is a decrease in basal and stimulated GH secretion. IGF-I, which has negative feedback effects on GH secretion, could be the initial mediator of such alterations. We studied IGF-I levels in obese subjects and their relationship to the obesity level and GH secretion. We determined plasma IGF-I, basal and stimulated GH in 30 normal and 30 obese women and related these variables to obesity indices (body mass index, BMI, and % overweight). Baseline plasma GH values were 1.2 +/- 0.3 and 2.3 +/- 0.6 micrograms/l in obese subjects and controls, respectively (NS). Mean peak GH secretion after stimuli were 11.2 +/- 1.4 and 34.4 +/- 5.6 micrograms/l in obese subjects and controls, respectively (p less than 0.001). Plasma IGF-I were 1.0 +/- 0.1 U/ml and 0.7 +/- 0.1 U/l in obese subjects and controls, respectively (NS). There was a significant negative correlation between plasma IGF-I and age (r = -0.55, p less than 0.001) and a significant negative correlation between mean peak GH secretion and weight (r = -0.60, p less than 0.001), BMI (r = -0.64, p less than 0.001) and percentage of ideal body weight (r = -0.67, p less than 0.001). We did not find any correlation between IGF-I and indices of overweight. These data suggest that the reduced GH secretion found in obesity is not related to a negative feedback inhibition by elevated levels of IGF-I and that adiposity is not associated with a decline in IGF-I levels. We confirm the existence of a negative correlation between GH secretion and obesity indices.     

Effects of acute intravenous injection of two growth hormone-releasing hormones (GHRH 1-40 and 1-29) on serum growth hormone and other pituitary hormones in short children with pulsatile growth hormone secretion

We administered two different growth hormone-releasing hormones (GHRH) to 20 short, prepubertal children who had spontaneous secretion of growth hormone (GH), assessed from 24-hour GH secretion profiles (72 sampling periods of 20 min). We compared one i.v. injection of 1 microgram/kg of GHRH 1-40 with that of GHRH 1-29 regarding serum concentrations of GH, prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and IGF-I. The children were allocated to two groups without statistical randomization. Both groups were given both peptides, with at least 1 week in between. The first group started with GHRH 1-40, the other with GHRH 1-29. The peptides both induced an increased serum concentration of GH of the same magnitude: mean maximal peak of 89 +/- 12 mU/l after GHRH 1-40 and 94 +/- 10 mU/l after GHRH 1-29 (n.s.). The mean difference in maximum serum GH concentration in each child after injection was 52 +/- 9 mU/l, range 1-153 mU/l. GHRH 1-29 also induced a short-term, small increase in the concentrations of prolactin (p less than 0.05), luteinizing hormone (p less than 0.01) and follicle-stimulating hormone (p less than 0.05). We conclude that the shorter sequence GHRH 1-29, when given in a dose of 1 microgram/kg, gives a rise in serum concentration of GH similar to that after the native form GHRH 1-40.     

Low-dose growth hormone treatment with diet restriction accelerates body fat loss, exerts anabolic effect and improves growth hormone secretory dysfunction in obese adults.

Growth hormone (GH) can induce an accelerated lipolysis. Impaired secretion of GH in obesity results in the consequent loss of the lipolytic effect of GH. Dietary restriction as a basic treatment for obesity is complicated by poor compliance, protein catabolism, and slow rates or weight loss. GH has an anabolic effect by increasing insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. We investigated the effects of GH treatment and dietary restriction on lipolytic and anabolic actions, as well as the consequent changes in insulin and GH secretion in obesity. 24 obese subjects (22 women and 2 men; 22-46 years old) were fed a diet of 25 kcal/kg ideal body weight (IBW) with 1.2 g protein/kg IBW daily and were treated with recombinant human GH (n = 12, 0.18 U/kg IBW/week) or placebo (n = 12, vehicle injection) in a 12-week randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial. GH treatment caused a 1.6-fold increase in the fraction of body weight lost as fat and a greater loss of visceral fat area than placebo treatment (35.3 vs. 28.5%, p < 0.05). In the placebo group, there was a loss in lean body mass (-2.62 +/- 1.51 kg) and a negative nitrogen balance (-4.52 +/- 3.51 g/day). By contrast, the GH group increased in lean body mass (1.13 +/- 1.04 kg) and had a positive nitrogen balance (1.81 +/- 2.06 g/day). GH injections caused a 1.6-fold increase in IGF-I, despite caloric restriction. GH response to L-dopa stimulation was blunted in all subjects and it was increased after treatment in both groups. GH treatment did not induce a further increase in insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) but significantly decreased free fatty acid (FFA) levels during OGTT. The decrease in FFA area under the curve during OGTT was positively correlated with visceral fat loss. This study demonstrates that in obese subjects given a hypocaloric diet, GH accelerates body fat loss, exerts anabolic effects and improves GH secretion. These findings suggest a possible therapeutic role of low-dose GH with caloric restriction for obesity.     

Serum glucose and free fatty acids modulate growth hormone and luteinizing hormone secretion in the pig

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of free fatty acids (FFA) and glucose treatment on growth hormone (GH) and luteinizing hormone secretion in the pig. In Experiment (Exp) 1, 15 prepuberal gilts received an intravenous infusion of FFA (n = 5; 3 ml of 10% Liposyn II/kg), glucose (n = 5; 1 g/kg), or saline (n = 5; 3 ml of 0.9%/kg). Jugular blood samples were collected every 15 min for 2 hr before and 3 hr after intravenous infusion of saline, FFA, and glucose. Synthetic [Ala15]-h growth hormone-releasing factor-(1-29)NH2 (1 microgram/kg) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (0.2 micrograms/kg) were administered 30 min after infusion (Time 0 = infusion). In Exp 2, eight prepuberal gilts received either FFA (n = 4) or saline (n = 4) as described in Exp 1, except that treatments were given every hour ove a 10-hr period. Blood samples were collected every 15 min from 1 hr before to 10 hr after the start of FFA or saline infusion. In Exp 1, the peak GH response to growth hormone-releasing factor was delayed by 45 min (P less than 0.01) by glucose treatment and suppressed (P less than 0.01) by FFA treatment. The luteinizing hormone response to gonadotroph-releasing hormone was suppressed (P less than 0.03) by glucose and enhanced (P less than 0.03) by FFA. In Exp 2, the number of GH pulses was increased (P less than 0.05) by FFA infusion and GH concentrations were positively correlated (r = 0.58, P less than 0.0003) with FFA concentrations, while luteinizing hormone pulse amplitude was greater (P less than 0.01) in FFA gilts than in saline gilts. These results indicate that FFA are more effective modulators of GH secretion than acute hyperglycemia, while metabolic status can alter pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone.     

Influence of leptin, androgens and insulin sensitivity on increased GH response to clonidine in lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Our aim was to investigate whether insulin sensitivity, leptin, androgen or estradiol levels are associated with disturbed GH response to clonidine in lean patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fourteen lean polycystic ovary syndrome patients, 11 ovulatory patients presenting idiopathic hirsutism and 10 non-hirsute, normal women with regular cycles paired for age and BMI were included in a cross-sectional study. Baseline hormonal and metabolic variables were assessed and analyzed in association with GH response to oral administration of 0.3 mg of clonidine. Delta GH was significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the IH and control groups (p = 0.014). The groups were similar in terms of body mass index, insulin, glucose, total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides and estradiol levels. Free androgen index (r = 0. 454, p = 0.015) and leptin (r = 0.419, p = 0.023) were positively correlated with the homeostasis model assessment. The homeostasis model assessment was the only variable that significantly correlated with GH response to clonidine (r = 0.375, p = 0.029) (vs. estradiol, free androgen index, leptin and LH). Nonetheless, when the analysis was adjusted for leptin levels and free androgen index, the statistical significance of this correlation was lost. The increased GH secretion observed in our lean PCOS patients may be associated with slight changes in insulin sensitivity, even in the absence of clinical evidence of insulin resistance. This association seems to be modulated by leptin and androgen levels.     

Serum thyrotropin response to combined arginine and thyrotropin-releasing hormone administration provides evidence for an altered somatostatinergic tone in acromegaly.

The aim of this study was to evaluate plasma thyrotropin (TSH), prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) responses to the TSH-releasing hormone (TRH) test and to a combined arginine-TRH test (ATT-TRH) in 10 normal subjects and in 15 acromegalic patients. In controls, TSH responsiveness to TRH was enhanced by ATT (p less than 0.001). When considering the 15 acromegalic patients as a whole, no significant difference in TSH responses was detected during the two tests. However, patients without suppression of plasma GH levels after oral glucose load showed an increased TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test if compared to TRH alone (p less than 0.025), while patients with partial suppression of plasma GH levels after glucose ingestion showed a decreased TSH responsiveness to ATT-TRH (p less than 0.05). No difference was recorded in PRL and GH responses, evaluated as area under the curve, during TRH or ATT-TRH tests in controls and in acromegalics. In conclusion, (1) normal subjects have an enhanced TSH response to the ATT-TRH test and (2) acromegalic patients without suppression of GH levels after oral glucose load show a TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test similar to that of controls, while acromegalics with partial GH suppression after oral glucose load have a decreased TSH responsiveness to the ATT-TRH test. These data suggest that acromegaly is a heterogeneous disease as far as the somatostatinergic tone is concerned.