Integrins in development and cancer

The correct control of cell fate decisions is critical for metazoan development and tissue homeostasis. It is established that the integrin family of cell surface receptors regulate cell fate by mediating cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. However, our understanding of how the different family members control discrete aspects of cell biology, and how this varies between tissues and is temporally regulated, is still in its infancy. An emerging area of investigation aims to understand how integrins translate changes in tension in the surrounding microenvironment into biological responses. This is particularly pertinent due to changes in the mechanical properties of the ECM having been linked to diseases, such as cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the roles integrins play in important developmental processes, such as proliferation, polarity, apoptosis, differentiation and maintenance of “stemness”. We also discuss recent advances in integrin mechanobiology and highlight the involvement of integrins and aberrant ECM in cancer.     

Integrins during evolution: Evolutionary trees and model organisms

The integrins form a large family of cell adhesion receptors. All multicellular animals express integrins, indicating that the family evolved relatively early in the history of metazoans, and homologous sequences of the component domains of integrin α and β subunits are seen in prokaryotes. Some integrins, however, seem to be much younger. For example, the αI domain containing integrins, including collagen receptors and leukocyte integrins, have been found in chordates only. Here, we will discuss what conclusions can be drawn about integrin function by studying the evolutionary conservation of integrins. We will also look at how studying integrins in organisms such as the fruit fly and mouse has helped our understanding of integrin evolution-function relationships. As an illustration of this, we will summarize the current understanding of integrin involvement in skeletal muscle formation.     

Structural and mechanical functions of integrins

Integrins are ubiquitously expressed cell surface receptors that play a critical role in regulating the interaction between a cell and its microenvironment to control cell fate. These molecules are regulated either via their expression on the cell surface or through a unique bidirectional signalling mechanism. However, integrins are just the tip of the adhesome iceberg, initiating the assembly of a large range of adaptor and signalling proteins that mediate the structural and signalling functions of integrin. In this review, we summarise the structure of integrins and mechanisms by which integrin activation is controlled. The different adhesion structures formed by integrins are discussed, as well as the mechanical and structural roles integrins play during cell migration. As the function of integrin signalling can be quite varied based on cell type and context, an in depth understanding of these processes will aid our understanding of aberrant adhesion and migration, which is often associated with human pathologies such as cancer.     

Integrin signalling in neutrophils and macrophages.

Integrins have been characterized extensively as adhesion receptors capable of transducing signals inside the cell. In myelomonocytic cells, integrin-mediated adhesive interactions regulate different selective cell responses, such as transmigration into the inflammatory site, cytokine secretion, production or reactive oxygen intermediates, degranulation and phagocytosis. In the last few years, great progress has been made in elucidating mechanisms of signal transduction by integrins in neutrophils and macrophages. This review summarises the current information on the role of integrins in regulating myelomonocytic cell functions and highlights the signalling pathways activated by integrin engagement in these cells. Also, exploiting the current knowledge of mechanisms of integrin signal transduction in other cell types, we propose a model to explain how integrins transduce signals inside neutrophils and macrophages, and how signaling pathways leading to regulation of selective cell functions may be coordinated.     

Integrin clipping: A novel adhesion switch?

During human prostate cancer progression, the majority of normally expressed integrins are suppressed with the exception of the alpha6, alpha3, and beta1 integrins. We have shown that in prostate cancer, the alpha6 integrin is found paired with the beta1 integrin and that a novel form of the alpha6 integrin that lacks a large portion of the extracellular domain (alpha6p) exists. The alpha6pbeta1 integrin is found in human prostate cancer tissue specimens as well as tissue culture cell lines and is formed on the cell surface. This review discusses the mechanism of alpha6pbeta1 production and the potential functions of this integrin variant. Our current working model predicts that the alpha6pbeta1 integrin maintains the intracellular cytoskeletal connections associated with the heterodimer while allowing for an alteration in cell adhesion. The mechanism provides a selective advantage for cancer cell metastasis.     

Chemical modulation of VLA integrin affinity in human breast cancer cells

The fact that disruption of integrin-extracellular matrix contacts leads to cell death, has converted cell adhesion into a potential target for the control of invasive cancer. In this work, we studied the functional consequences of the interference with the activity of the very late activation antigen (VLA) family of integrins in human breast cancer cell lines of distinct malignancy. The alpha2beta1-mediated adhesion reduced the entry of highly malignant, hormone-independent breast cancer cells into apoptosis. Adhesion of breast cancer cells through the VLA integrins alpha2beta1 and alpha5beta1 was significantly reduced by an apoptosis-inducing natural triterpenoid, dehydrothyrsiferol (DT), when studied on low amounts of extracellular matrix. This effect was dose-dependent, not related to cell toxicity and not shared with apoptosis-inducing standard chemotherapeutics, such as doxorubicin and taxol. The compound did not affect either the cell surface expression level of VLA integrins or cell distribution of vinculin and actin during cell spreading. In addition, neither phosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase pp125FAK on Tyr397 nor the protein kinase B (Akt/PKB) on Ser473 was significantly altered by DT. The integrin activation level, assessed by binding of soluble collagen to the alpha2beta1 integrin, was reduced upon cell treatment with DT. Importantly, the TS2/16, an anti-beta1 activating monoclonal antibody was able to rescue DT-treated cells from apoptosis. Since the activation state of integrins is increasingly recognized as an essential factor in metastasis formation, findings presented herein reveal that the chemical regulation of integrin affinity may be a potential therapeutic strategy in cancer therapy.     

Characterisation of alpha3beta1 and alpha(v)beta3 integrin N-oligosaccharides in metastatic melanoma WM9 and WM239 cell lines

It is well documented that glycan synthesis is altered in some pathological processes, including cancer. The most frequently observed alterations during tumourigenesis are extensive expression of beta1,6-branched complex type N-glycans, the presence of poly-N-acetyllactosamine structures, and high sialylation of cell surface glycoproteins. This study investigated two integrins, alpha3beta1 and alpha(v)beta3, whose expression is closely related to cancer progression. Their oligosaccharide structures in two metastatic melanoma cell lines (WM9, WM239) were analysed with the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry. Both examined integrins possessed heavily sialylated and fucosylated glycans, with beta1,6-branches and short polylactosamine chains. In WM9 cells, alpha3beta1 integrin was more variously glycosylated than alpha(v)beta3; in WM239 cells the situation was the reverse. Functional studies (wound healing and ELISA integrin binding assays) revealed that the N-oligosaccharide component of the tested integrins influenced melanoma cell migration on vitronectin and alpha3beta1 integrin binding to laminin-5. Additionally, more variously glycosylated integrins exerted a stronger influence on these parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report concerning structural characterisation of alpha(v)beta3 integrin glycans in melanoma or in any cancer cells.     

Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction

Cell adhesion mediated by integrin receptors has a critical function in organizing cells in tissues and in guiding haematopoietic cells to their sites of action. However, integrin adhesion receptors have broader functions in regulating cell behaviour through their ability to transduce bi-directional signals into and out of the cell and to engage in reciprocal interactions with other cellular receptors. This historical perspective traces the key findings that have led to our current understanding of these important functions of integrins.     

Tetraspanin CD82 attenuates cellular morphogenesis through down-regulating integrin alpha6-mediated cell adhesion

Tetraspanin CD82 has been implicated in integrin-mediated functions such as cell motility and invasiveness. Although tetraspanins associate with integrins, it is unknown if and how CD82 regulates the functionality of integrins. In this study, we found that Du145 prostate cancer cells underwent morphogenesis on the reconstituted basement membrane Matrigel to form an anastomosing network of multicellular structures. This process entirely depends on integrin alpha6, a receptor for laminin. After CD82 is expressed in Du145 cells, this cellular morphogenesis was abolished, indicating a functional cross-talk between CD82 and alpha6 integrins. Interestingly, antibodies against other tetraspanins expressed in Du145 cells such as CD9, CD81, and CD151 did not block this integrin alpha6-dependent morphogenesis. We further found that CD82 significantly inhibited cell adhesion on laminin 1. Notably, the level of alpha6 integrins on the cell surface was down-regulated upon CD82 expression, although total cellular alpha6 protein levels remained unchanged in CD82-expressing cells. This down-regulation indicates that the diminished cell adhesiveness of CD82-expressing Du145 cells on laminin likely resulted from less cell surface expression of alpha6 integrins. As expected, CD82 physically associated with the integrin alpha6 in Du145-CD82 transfectant cells, suggesting that the formation of the CD82-integrin alpha6 complex reduces alpha6 integrin cell surface expression. Finally, the internalization of cell surface integrin alpha6 is significantly enhanced upon CD82 expression. In conclusion, our results indicate that 1) CD82 attenuates integrin alpha6 signaling during a cellular morphogenic process; 2) the decreased surface expression of alpha6 integrins in CD82-expressing cells is likely responsible for the diminished adhesiveness on laminin and, subsequently, results in the attenuation of alpha6 integrin-mediated cellular morphogenesis; and 3) the accelerated internalization of integrin alpha6 upon CD82 expression correlates with the down-regulation of cell surface integrin alpha6.     

Insulin-like growth factor 1 stimulation of androgen receptor activity requires β(1A) integrins

Despite the findings that β1 integrins play a vital role in the regulation of cell proliferation and survival, the mechanisms through which they operate and lead to cancer progression remain elusive. Previously, our laboratory has shown that β(1A) integrins support insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGFI)-mediated mitogenic and transforming activities. Here, we report that β(1A) integrins regulate basal levels of IGF-IR, although they are not critical for maintaining cancer cell morphology. Upon transfection of β(1A) siRNA and consequent downregulation of IGF-IR, we show inhibition of anchorage-independent growth of prostate cancer cells, a function which is dependent on IGF-IR expression. In addition, we demonstrate that IGFI-mediated activation of androgen receptor (AR), known to occur in prostate cancer cells, requires expression of β(1A) integrins as evaluated by luciferase reporter assays and immunoblotting analysis. Since β(1A) integrin levels are increased by R1881 or dihydrotestosterone (DHT), our results imply that β(1A) integrins support an androgen-enhanced feedback loop that regulates the expression of IGF-IR. β(1A) integrins also regulate inducible levels of IGF-IR in cells stimulated by androgen or by a combination of androgen and IGFI, as evaluated by flow cytometric analysis and immunoblotting. Furthermore, upon transfection of β(1A) siRNA and consequent downregulation of IGF-IR, neither activation of AKT, an effector of IGF-IR, nor AR levels are affected. We conclude that β(1A) integrin expression is critical for maintaining the regulatory crosstalk between IGF-IR and AR.     

A functionally neutral single chain antibody to measure beta‐1 integrin uptake and recycling

Integrin‐mediated cell adhesion and signaling are critical for many physiological processes. The dynamic turnover of integrins and their associated adhesion complexes through endocytic and recycling pathways has emerged as an important mechanism for controlling cell migration and invasion in cancer. Thus, the regulation of integrin trafficking and how this may be altered by disease‐specific molecular mechanisms has generated considerable interest. However, current tools available to study integrin trafficking may cause artifacts and/or do not provide adequate kinetic information. Here, we report the generation of a functionally neutral and monovalent single chain antibody to quantitatively and qualitatively measure β1 integrin trafficking in cells. Our novel probe can be used in a variety of assays and allows for the biochemical characterization of rapid recycling of endogenous integrins. We also demonstrate its potential utility in live cell imaging, providing proof of principle to guide future integrin probe design.     

Characterization of adhesion properties of the cardiomyocyte integrins and extracellular matrix proteins using atomic force microscopy

Integrins are transmembrane adhesion receptors that play important roles in the cardiovascular system by interacting with the extracellular matrix (ECM). However, direct quantitative measurements of the adhesion properties of the integrins on cardiomyocyte (CM) and their ECM ligands are lacking. In this study, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to quantify the adhesion force (peak force and mean force) and binding probability between CM integrins and three main heart tissue ECM proteins, ie, collagen (CN), fibronectin (FN), and laminin (LN). Functionalizing the AFM probes with ECM proteins, we found that the peak force (mean force) was 61.69 ± 5.5 pN (76.54 ± 4.0 pN), 39.26 ± 4.4 pN (59.84 ± 3.6 pN), and 108.31 ± 4.2 pN (129.63 ± 6.0 pN), respectively, for the bond of CN‐integrin, FN‐integrin, and LN‐integrin. The binding specificity between CM integrins and ECM proteins was verified by using monoclonal antibodies, where α₁₀‐ and α₁₁‐integrin bind to CN, α₃‐ and α₅‐integrin bind to FN, and α₃‐ and α₇‐integrin bind to LN. Furthermore, adhesion properties of CM integrins under physiologically high concentrations of extracellular Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ were tested. Additional Ca²⁺ reduced the adhesion mean force to 68.81 ± 4.0 pN, 49.84 ± 3.3 pN, and 119.21 ± 5.8 pN and binding probability to 0.31, 0.34, 0.40 for CN, FN, and LN, respectively, whereas Mg²⁺ caused very minor changes to adhesion properties of CM integrins. Thus, adhesion properties between adult murine CM integrins and its main ECM proteins were characterized, paving the way for an improved understanding of CM mechanobiology.     

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (CD87) is a ligand for integrins and mediates cell-cell interaction

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its receptor (uPAR/CD87) regulates cellular adhesion, migration, and tumor cell invasion. However, it is unclear how glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR, which lacks a transmembrane structure, mediates signal transduction. It has been proposed that uPAR forms cis-interactions with integrins as an associated protein and thereby transduces proliferative or migratory signals to cells upon binding of uPA. We provide evidence that soluble uPAR (suPAR) specifically binds to integrins alpha4beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha9beta1, and alphavbeta3 on Chinese hamster ovary cells in a cation-dependent manner. Anti-integrin and anti-uPAR antibodies effectively block binding of suPAR to these integrins. Binding of suPAR to alpha4beta1 and alphavbeta3 is blocked by known soluble ligands and by the integrin mutations that inhibit ligand binding. These results suggest that uPAR is an integrin ligand rather than, or in addition to, an integrin-associated protein. In addition, we demonstrate that glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR on the cell surface specifically binds to integrins on the apposing cells, suggesting that uPAR-integrin interaction may mediate cell-cell interaction (trans-interaction). These previously unrecognized uPAR-integrin interactions may allow uPAR to transduce signals through the engaged integrin without a hypothetical transmembrane adapter and may provide a potential therapeutic target for control of inflammation and cancer.     

A Spatial Model for Integrin Clustering as a Result of Feedback between Integrin Activation and Integrin Binding

Integrins are transmembrane adhesion receptors that bind extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and signal bidirectionally to regulate cell adhesion and migration. In many cell types, integrins cluster at cell-ECM contacts to create the foundation for adhesion complexes that transfer force between the cell and the ECM. Even though the temporal and spatial regulation of these integrin clusters is essential for cell migration, how cells regulate their formation is currently unknown. It has been shown that integrin cluster formation is independent of actin stress fiber formation, but requires active (high-affinity) integrins, phosphoinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), talin, and immobile ECM ligand. Based on these observations, we propose a minimal model for initial formation of integrin clusters, facilitated by localized activation and binding of integrins to ECM ligands as a result of biochemical feedback between integrin binding and integrin activation. By employing a diffusion-reaction framework for modeling these reactions, we show how spatial organization of bound integrins into clusters may be achieved by a local source of active integrins, namely protein complexes formed on the cytoplasmic tails of bound integrins. Further, we show how such a mechanism can turn small local increases in the concentration of active talin or active integrin into integrin clusters via positive feedback. Our results suggest that the formation of integrin clusters by the proposed mechanism depends on the relationships between production and diffusion of integrin-activating species, and that changes to the relative rates of these processes may affect the resulting properties of integrin clusters.     

Inhibition of Cancer Cell Adhesion,Migration and Proliferation by a Bispecific Antibody that Targets two Distinct Epitopes on αv Integrins

Members of the αv family of integrins regulate activation of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) and are directly involved in pro-tumorigenic phenotypes. Thus, αv integrins may be therapeutic targets for fibrosis and cancer, yet the isolation of selective inhibitors is currently a challenge. We generated synthetic antibodies selective for αv integrins by phage display selections on cell lines that displayed integrin heterodimers. We identified antibodies that targeted two distinct epitopes on cell-surface αv integrins and partially inhibited cell adhesion mediated by interactions between integrins and the latency-associated peptide, part of the pro-form of TGFβ. Using the isolated antibody paratope sequences we engineered a bispecific antibody capable of binding to both epitopes simultaneously; this antibody potently and completely inhibited cell adhesion mediated by integrins αvβ1, αvβ3 and αvβ5. In addition, the bispecific antibody inhibited proliferation and migration of lung carcinoma lines, where the highest and lowest potencies observed correlated with integrin-αv cell surface expression levels. Taken together, our results demonstrate that phage display selections with live cells can yield high quality anti-integrin antibodies, which we used as biparatopic building blocks to construct a bispecific antibody that strongly inhibited integrin function and may be a therapeutic candidate for cancer and fibrosis.     

Structure of the PTB domain of tensin1 and a model for its recruitment to fibrillar adhesions

Tensin is a cytoskeletal protein that links integrins to the actin cytoskeleton at sites of cell-matrix adhesion. Here we describe the crystal structure of the phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain of tensin1, and show that it binds integrins in an NPxY-dependent fashion. Alanine mutagenesis of both the PTB domain and integrin tails supports a model of integrin binding similar to that of the PTB-like domain of talin. However, we also show that phosphorylation of the NPxY tyrosine, which disrupts talin binding, has a negligible effect on tensin binding. This suggests that tyrosine phosphorylation of integrin, which occurs during the maturation of focal adhesions, could act as a switch to promote the migration of tensin-integrin complexes into fibronectin-mediated fibrillar adhesions.     

Methylselenol generated from selenomethionine by methioninase downregulates integrin expression and induces caspase-mediated apoptosis of B16F10 melanoma cells

Melanoma is a highly metastatic cancer resistant to current chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic approaches. Several studies have shown that interactions between cancer cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) are critical for the survival and invasion of metastatic cancer cells. In this study, we examine the effects of methylselenol generated from selenomethionine (SeMet) by methioninase (METase) on cell proliferation, adhesion, and expression of integrins in murine melanoma B16F10 cells, which are metastatic in the lungs of syngeneic C57BL/6J mice. Combined treatment with SeMet-METase decreased the expression of integrins alpha(4), beta(1), alpha(nu), and beta(3), and inhibited melanoma-ECM adhesion. Caspase-mediated apoptosis was induced following loss of cell adherence. Phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and Akt, related to integrin-mediated survival, were decreased upon treatment with SeMet-METase while phosphorylation of p38, PKC-delta, and IkappaBalpha increased. In the presence of specific inhibitors of p38, PKC-delta, and NF-kappaB, expression of integrins and cell adhesion to ECM were maintained and cell apoptosis was prevented in SeMet-METase-treated melanoma cells. Treatment with caspase inhibitors restored cell viability and blocked poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, but did not restore integrin expression and cell adhesion to ECMs reduced by SeMet-METase. Based on these results, we propose that combined treatment with SeMet-METase induces caspase-mediated apoptosis in melanoma cells by altering integrin expression and adhesion. Furthermore, activation of p38, PKC-delta, and NF-kappaB is a prerequisite for the down-regulation of integrin expression, followed by detachment-mediated apoptosis.     

The interaction between uPAR and vitronectin triggers ligand‐independent adhesion signalling by integrins

The urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a non‐integrin vitronectin (VN) cell adhesion receptor linked to the plasma membrane by a glycolipid anchor. Through structure–function analyses of uPAR, VN and integrins, we document that uPAR‐mediated cell adhesion to VN triggers a novel type of integrin signalling that is independent of integrin–matrix engagement. The signalling is fully active on VN mutants deficient in integrin binding site and is also efficiently transduced by integrins deficient in ligand binding. Although integrin ligation is dispensable, signalling is crucially dependent upon an active conformation of the integrin and its association with intracellular adaptors such as talin. This non‐canonical integrin signalling is not restricted to uPAR as it poses no structural constraints to the receptor mediating cell attachment. In contrast to canonical integrin signalling, where integrins form direct mechanical links between the ECM and the cytoskeleton, the molecular mechanism enabling the crosstalk between non‐integrin adhesion receptors and integrins is dependent upon membrane tension. This suggests that for this type of signalling, the membrane represents a critical component of the molecular clutch.     

Integrin–TGF‐β crosstalk in fibrosis,cancer and wound healing

Accumulating evidence indicates that there is extensive crosstalk between integrins and TGF‐β signalling. TGF‐β affects integrin‐mediated cell adhesion and migration by regulating the expression of integrins, their ligands and integrin‐associated proteins. Conversely, several integrins directly control TGF‐β activation. In addition, a number of integrins can interfere with both Smad‐dependent and Smad‐independent TGF‐β signalling in different ways, including the regulation of the expression of TGF‐β signalling pathway components, the physical association of integrins with TGF‐β receptors and the modulation of downstream effectors. Reciprocal TGF‐β–integrin signalling is implicated in normal physiology, as well as in a variety of pathological processes including systemic sclerosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer; thus, integrins could provide attractive therapeutic targets to interfere with TGF‐β signalling in these processes.     

Role of integrins in cancer: survey of expression patterns

Tumor cells are characterized by uncontrolled growth, invasion to surrounding tissues, and metastatic spread to distant sites. Mortality from cancer is often due to metastasis since surgical removal of tumors can enhance and prolong survival. The integrins constitute a family of transmembrane receptor proteins composed of heterodimeric complexes of noncovalently linked alpha and beta chains. Integrins function in cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesive interactions and transduce signals from the ECM to the cell interior and vice versa. Hence, the integrins mediate the ECM influence on cell growth and differentiation. Since these properties implicate integrin involvement in cell migration, invasion, intra- and extra-vasation, and platelet interaction, a role for integrins in tumor growth and metastasis is obvious. These findings are underpinned by observations that the integrins are linked to the actin cytoskeleton involving talin, vinculin, and alpha-actinin as intermediaries. Such cytoskeletal changes can be manifested by rounded cell morphology, which is often coincident with tumor transformation via decreased or increased integrin expression patterns. For the various types of cancers, different changes in integrin expression are further associated with tumor growth and metastasis. Tumor progression leading to metastasis appears to involve equipping cancer cells with the appropriate adhesive (integrin) phenotype for interaction with the ECM. Therapies directed at influencing integrin cell expression and function are presently being explored for inhibition of tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Such therapeutic strategies include anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies, peptidic inhibitors (cyclic and linear), calcium-binding protein antagonists, proline analogs, apoptosis promotors, and antisense oligonucleotides. Moreover, platelet aggregation induced by tumor cells, which facilitates metastatic spread, can be inhibited by the disintegrins, a family of viper venom-like peptides. Therefore, adhesion molecules from the integrin family and components of angiogenesis might be useful as tumor progression markers for prognostic and for diagnostic purposes. Development of integrin cell expression profiles for individual tumors may have further potential in identifying a cell surface signature for a specific tumor type and/or stage. Thus, recent advances in elucidating the structure, function, ECM binding, and signaling pathways of the integrins have led to new and exciting modalities for cancer therapeutics and diagnoses.