Cell nucleus as a microrheological probe to study the rheology of the cytoskeleton

Mechanical properties of the cell are important biomarkers for probing its architectural changes caused by cellular processes and/or pathologies. The development of microfluidic technologies has enabled measuring the cell’s mechanical properties at high throughput so that mechanical phenotyping can be applied to large samples in reasonable timescales. These studies typically measure the stiffness of the cell as the only mechanical biomarker and do not disentangle the rheological contributions of different structural components of the cell, including the cell cortex, the interior cytoplasm and its immersed cytoskeletal structures, and the nucleus. Recent advancements in high-speed fluorescent imaging have enabled probing the deformations of the cell cortex while also tracking different intracellular components in rates applicable to microfluidic platforms. We present a, to our knowledge, novel method to decouple the mechanics of the cell cortex and the cytoplasm by analyzing the correlation between the cortical deformations that are induced by external microfluidic flows and the nucleus displacements, induced by those cortical deformations, i.e., we use the nucleus as a high-throughput microrheological probe to study the rheology of the cytoplasm, independent of the cell cortex mechanics. To demonstrate the applicability of this method, we consider a proof-of-concept model consisting of a rigid spherical nucleus centered in a spherical cell. We obtain analytical expressions for the time-dependent nucleus velocity as a function of the cell deformations when the interior cytoplasm is modeled as a viscous, viscoelastic, porous, and poroelastic material and demonstrate how the nucleus velocity can be used to characterize the linear rheology of the cytoplasm over a wide range of forces and timescales/frequencies.     

Keeping the LINC: the importance of nucleocytoskeletal coupling in intracellular force transmission and cellular function

Providing a stable physical connection between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton is essential for a wide range of cellular functions and it could also participate in mechanosensing by transmitting intra- and extra-cellular mechanical stimuli via the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nesprins and SUN proteins, located at the nuclear envelope, form the LINC (linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton) complex that connects the nucleus to the cytoskeleton; underlying nuclear lamins contribute to anchoring LINC complex components at the nuclear envelope. Disruption of the LINC complex or loss of lamins can result in disturbed perinuclear actin and intermediate filament networks and causes severe functional defects, including impaired nuclear positioning, cell polarization and cell motility. Recent studies have identified the LINC complex as the major force-transmitting element at the nuclear envelope and suggest that many of the aforementioned defects can be attributed to disturbed force transmission between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. Thus mutations in nesprins, SUN proteins or lamins, which have been linked to muscular dystrophies and cardiomyopathies, may weaken or completely eliminate LINC complex function at the nuclear envelope and result in impaired intracellular force transmission, thereby disrupting critical cellular functions.     

Biophysical Assays to Probe the Mechanical Properties of the Interphase Cell Nucleus: Substrate Strain Application and Microneedle Manipulation

In most eukaryotic cells, the nucleus is the largest organelle and is typically 2 to 10 times stiffer than the surrounding cytoskeleton; consequently, the physical properties of the nucleus contribute significantly to the overall biomechanical behavior of cells under physiological and pathological conditions. For example, in migrating neutrophils and invading cancer cells, nuclear stiffness can pose a major obstacle during extravasation or passage through narrow spaces within tissues.¹ On the other hand, the nucleus of cells in mechanically active tissue such as muscle requires sufficient structural support to withstand repetitive mechanical stress. Importantly, the nucleus is tightly integrated into the cellular architecture; it is physically connected to the surrounding cytoskeleton, which is a critical requirement for the intracellular movement and positioning of the nucleus, for example, in polarized cells, synaptic nuclei at neuromuscular junctions, or in migrating cells.² Not surprisingly, mutations in nuclear envelope proteins such as lamins and nesprins, which play a critical role in determining nuclear stiffness and nucleo-cytoskeletal coupling, have been shown recently to result in a number of human diseases, including Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy.³ To investigate the biophysical function of diverse nuclear envelope proteins and the effect of specific mutations, we have developed experimental methods to study the physical properties of the nucleus in single, living cells subjected to global or localized mechanical perturbation. Measuring induced nuclear deformations in response to precisely applied substrate strain application yields important information on the deformability of the nucleus and allows quantitative comparison between different mutations or cell lines deficient for specific nuclear envelope proteins. Localized cytoskeletal strain application with a microneedle is used to complement this assay and can yield additional information on intracellular force transmission between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton. Studying nuclear mechanics in intact living cells preserves the normal intracellular architecture and avoids potential artifacts that can arise when working with isolated nuclei. Furthermore, substrate strain application presents a good model for the physiological stress experienced by cells in muscle or other tissues (e.g., vascular smooth muscle cells exposed to vessel strain). Lastly, while these tools have been developed primarily to study nuclear mechanics, they can also be applied to investigate the function of cytoskeletal proteins and mechanotransduction signaling. Download video file.^{(105M, mov)}     

DNA-tumor virus entry—From plasma membrane to the nucleus

DNA-tumor viruses comprise enveloped and non-enveloped agents that cause malignancies in a large variety of cell types and tissues by interfering with cell cycle control and immortalization. Those DNA-tumor viruses that replicate in the nucleus use cellular mechanisms to transport their genome and newly synthesized viral proteins into the nucleus. This requires cytoplasmic transport and nuclear import of their genome. Agents that employ this strategy include adenoviruses, hepadnaviruses, herpesviruses, and likely also papillomaviruses, and polyomaviruses, but not poxviruses which replicate in the cytoplasm. Here, we discuss how DNA-tumor viruses enter cells, take advantage of cytoplasmic transport, and import their DNA genome through the nuclear pore complex into the nucleus. Remarkably, nuclear import of incoming genomes does not necessarily follow the same pathways used by the structural proteins of the viruses during the replication and assembly phases of the viral life cycle. Understanding the mechanisms of DNA nuclear import can identify new pathways of cell regulation and anti-viral therapies.     

Stable nuclear RNA returns to post-division nuclei following release to the cytoplasm during mitosis

When nuclei from ³H-RNA-containing amebae (A. proteus), chased for as many as 8 cell generations, are implanted into unlabeled enucleate cells, the nuclei retain 30% or more of the cellular ³H-RNA (or at least 15 times the cytoplasmic concentration of ³H-RNA). After such cells divide, the daughter nuclei retain approximately the same proportion of total cellular ³H-RNA—although all (or almost all) of the nuclear RNA is liberated to the cytoplasm during mitosis. Thus, we conclude that RNA stably associated with the interphase nucleus has a particular affinity for the nucleus despite the fact it is in the cytoplasm when the chromosomes are condensed and the nuclear envelope is not intact.     

Zinc transporters and the cellular trafficking of zinc

Zinc is an essential nutrient for all organisms because this metal serves as a catalytic or structural cofactor for many different proteins. Zinc-dependent proteins are found in the cytoplasm and within many organelles of the eukaryotic cell including the nucleus, the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, secretory vesicles, and mitochondria. Thus, cells require zinc transport mechanisms to allow cells to efficiently accumulate the metal ion and distribute it within the cell. Our current knowledge of these transport systems in eukaryotes is the focus of this review.     

Probing compressibility of the nuclear interior in wild-type and lamin deficient cells using microscopic imaging and computational modeling

Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus play an important role in maintaining the integrity of the genome and controlling the cellular force balance. Irregularities in these properties have been related to disruption of a variety of force-dependent processes in the cell, such as migration, division, growth or differentiation. Characterizing mechanical properties of the cell nucleus in situ and relating these parameters to cellular phenotypes remain challenging tasks, as conventional micromanipulation techniques do not allow direct probing of intracellular structures. Here, we present a framework based on light microscopic imaging and automated mechanical modeling that enables characterization of the compressibility of the nuclear interior in situ. Based entirely on optical methods, our approach does not require application of destructive or contacting techniques and it enables measurements of a significantly larger number of cells. Compressibility, in this paper represented by Poisson's ratio ν, is determined by fitting a numerical model to experimentally observed time series of microscopic images of fluorescent cell nuclei in which bleached patterns are introduced. In a proof-of-principle study, this framework was applied to estimate ν in wild type cells and cells lacking important structural proteins of the nuclear envelope (LMNA(-/-)). Based on measurements of a large number of cells, our study revealed distinctive changes in compressibility of the nuclear interior between these two cell types. Our method allows an automated, contact-free estimation of mechanical properties of intracellular structures. Combined with knockdown and overexpression screens, it paves the way towards a high-throughput measurement of intracellular mechanical properties in functional phenotyping screens.     

Influence of Lamin A on the Mechanical Properties of Amphibian Oocyte Nuclei Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy

The nuclear lamina is part of the nuclear envelope (NE). Lamin filaments provide the nucleus with mechanical stability and are involved in many nuclear activities. The functional importance of these proteins is highlighted by mutations in lamin genes, which cause a variety of human diseases (laminopathies). Here we describe a method that allows one to quantify the contribution of lamin A protein to the mechanical properties of the NE. Lamin A is ectopically expressed in Xenopus oocytes, where it is incorporated into the NE of the oocyte nucleus, giving rise to a prominent lamina layer at the inner nuclear membrane. Nuclei are then isolated and probed by atomic force microscopy. From the resulting force curves, stiffness values are calculated and compared with those of control nuclei. Expression of lamin A significantly increases the stiffness of oocyte nuclei in a concentration-dependent manner. Since chromatin adds negligibly to nuclear mechanics in these giant nuclei, this method allows one to measure the contribution of individual NE components to nuclear mechanics.     

On the origin of intracellular compartmentation and organized metabolic systems

The history of the development of the ideas and research of organized metabolic systems during last three decades is shortly reviewed. The cell cytoplasm is crowded with solutes, soluble macromolecules such as enzymes, nucleic acids, structural proteins and membranes. The high protein density within the large compartments of the cells predominantly determines the major characteristics of cellular environment such as viscosity, diffusion and inhomogeneity. The fact that the solvent viscosity of cytoplasm is not substantially different from the water is explained by intracellular structural heterogeneity: the intrinsic macromolecular density is relatively low within the interstitial voids in the cell because many soluble enzymes are apparently integral parts of the insoluble cytomatrix and are not distributed homogeneously. The molecular crowding and sieving restrict the mobility of very large solutes, binding severely restrict the mobility of smaller solutes. One of consequence of molecular crowding and hindered diffusion is the need to compartmentalize metabolic pathway to overcome diffusive barriers. Although the movement of small molecules is slowed down in the cytoplasm, the metabolism can successfully proceed and even be facilitated by metabolite channeling which directly transfers the intermediate from one enzyme to an adjacent enzyme without the need of free aqueous-phase diffusion. The enhanced probability for intermediates to be transferred from one active site to the other by sequential enzymes requires stable or transient interactions of the relevant enzymes, which associate physically in non-dissociable, static multienzyme complexes--metabolones, particles containing enzymes of a part or whole metabolic systems. Therefore, within the living cell the metabolism depends on the structural organization of enzymes forming microcompartments. Since cells contain many compartments and microenvironments, the measurement of the concentration of metabolites in whole cells or tissues gives an average cellular concentration and not that which is actually sensed by the active site of a specific enzyme. Thus, the microcompartmentation could provide a mechanism which can control metabolic pathways. Independently and in parallel to the developments described above, the ideas of compartmentation came into existence from the necessity to explain important physiological phenomena, in particular in heart research and in cardiac electrophysiology. These phenomena demonstrated the physiological importance of the biophysical and biochemical mechanisms described in this review.     

Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures

Force-induced changes in genome expression as well as remodeling of nuclear architecture in development and disease motivate a deeper understanding of nuclear mechanics. Chromatin and green fluorescent protein-lamin B dynamics were visualized in a micropipette aspiration of isolated nuclei, and both were shown to contribute to viscoelastic properties of the somatic cell nucleus. Reversible swelling by almost 200% in volume, with changes in salt, demonstrates the resilience and large dilational capacity of the nuclear envelope, nucleoli, and chromatin. Swelling also proves an effective way to separate the mechanical contributions of nuclear elements. In unswollen nuclei, chromatin is a primary force-bearing element, whereas swollen nuclei are an order of magnitude softer, with the lamina sustaining much of the load. In both cases, nuclear deformability increases with time, scaling as a power law-thus lacking any characteristic timescale-when nuclei are either aspirated or indented by atomic force microscopy. The nucleus is stiff and resists distortion at short times, but it softens and deforms more readily at longer times. Such results indicate an essentially infinite spectrum of timescales for structural reorganization, with implications for regulating genome expression kinetics.     

雌激素受体α和β亚型在文昌鱼神经系统、哈氏窝和性腺中的定位

用兔抗人ER-α和ER-β多克隆抗体对文昌鱼神经系统、轮器哈氏窝和性腺进行免疫细胞化学的定位研究。结果揭示幼年和成年两性不同发育时期文昌鱼在这些部位分布ER-α和ER-β蛋白。ER-α定位在端脑、中脑、后脑和神经管中大多数神经细胞核,少数在胞质及其突起和神经纤维,ER-β则定位在细胞质或细胞膜上,少数在核内。ER—α免疫阳性物质主要分布在哈氏窝下层的上皮细胞核,少数在上层细胞质,β受体则在上层细胞核。在性腺,ER-α分布在卵巢中卵原细胞和小生长期卵母细胞胞质与核仁,生发泡(核)显免疫阴性,在大生长期卵母细胞核膜和核仁的免疫阳性显著增强,成熟期则在卵细胞生发泡表达,ER-β免疫阳性物质分布在卵原细胞和早期卵母细胞质以及成熟卵细胞的卵被膜检测到,生发泡显免疫阴性。在精巢,这两种ER亚型均定位在精原细胞、初级与次级精母细胞和足细胞质,精子细胞在胞核,精子显免疫阴性。另外,双染结果还揭示ER-α和ER-β在上述部位多数共存于同一细胞,少数在不同细胞表达,且在细胞定位有不同。首次发现这两种雌激素受体亚型在文昌鱼有广泛分布,它们介导雌激素对文昌鱼神经内分泌组织的调节作用。α和β受体在靶细胞定位的不同,提示两者在介导雌激素信号路线和基因转录机制可能有不同生理作用。     

Towards an integrated understanding of the structure and mechanics of the cell nucleus

Changes in the shape and structural organization of the cell nucleus occur during many fundamental processes including development, differentiation and aging. In many of these processes, the cell responds to physical forces by altering gene expression within the nucleus. How the nucleus itself senses and responds to such mechanical cues is not well understood. In addition to these external forces, epigenetic modifications of chromatin structure inside the nucleus could also alter its physical properties. To achieve a better understanding, we need to elucidate the relationship between nuclear structure and material properties. Recently, new approaches have been developed to systematically investigate nuclear mechanical properties. These experiments provide important new insights into the disease mechanism of a growing class of tissue-specific disorders termed 'nuclear envelopathies'. Here we review our current understanding of what determines the shape and mechanical properties of the cell nucleus.     

Nuclear actin and myosins: life without filaments

Actin and myosin are major components of the cell cytoskeleton, with structural and regulatory functions that affect many essential cellular processes. Although they were traditionally thought to function only in the cytoplasm, it is now well accepted that actin and multiple myosins are found in the nucleus. Increasing evidence on their functional roles has highlighted the importance of these proteins in the nuclear compartment.     

A cytological study of the ovary of Rhodnius prolixus. III. Cytoarchitecture and development of the trophic chamber

The tropharium of the telotrophic ovarioles of Rhodnius is syncytial with the nurse cell nuclei located in tortuous finger-like projections arborizing from a common cytoplasmic area, the trophic core. The nurse cell nuclei exhibit prominent nucleoli. Located adjacent to the nuclear envelope are masses of granular material both within the nucleus and adjoining cytoplasm. The cytoplasm consists primarily of ribosomes and mitochondria. The trophic core and the trophic cords that connect the core to individual oocytes characteristically possess parallel arrays of microtubules with ribosomes and mitochondria interspersed between. Surrounding the nurse tissue (germarium) is a thin layer of squamous cells comprising the inner sheath. The inner sheath is encompassed by the non-cellular tunica propria superficial to which are two external cellular sheaths. The syncytial nature of the tropharium appears to arise as a result of the fusion of many entangled nurse cell-oocyte complexes during the late fifth instar. The structural similarities, and possible homologies with the polytrophic type of ovariole is discussed.     

Two putative alpha-helical domains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr mediate nuclear localization by at least two mechanisms

To identify the domains of Vpr that are involved nuclear localization, we transfected HeLa cells with a panel of expression vectors that encode mutant Vpr protein with deletions or substitutions within putative domains. Immunofluorescence staining of transfected cells revealed that wild-type Vpr was localized predominantly in the nucleus and the nuclear envelope and certainly in the cytoplasm. Introduction of substitutions or deletions within alphaH1 or alphaH2 resulted, by contrast, in diffuse expression over the entire cell. In addition, double mutations within both of these alpha-helical domains led to the complete absence of Vpr from nuclei. Next, we prepared HeLa cells that express chimeric proteins which consist of the alphaH1 and alphaH2 domains fused individually with green fluorescent protein (GFP) and a Flag tag and extracted them with digitonin and Triton X-100 prior to fixation. Flag-alphaH1-GFP was detected in the nucleus but not in the cytoplasm, while Flag-alphaH2-GFP was retained predominantly in the nucleus and in a small amount in the cytoplasm. The immunostaining patterns were almost eliminated by substitutions in each chimeric protein. Thus, it appeared that the two alpha-helical domains might be involved in nuclear import by binding to certain cellular factors. Taken together, our data suggest that the two putative alpha-helical domains mediate the nuclear localization of Vpr by at least two mechanisms.     

Force-Induced Changes in Subnuclear Movement and Rheology

Extracellular mechanical forces result in changes in gene expression, but it is unclear how cells are able to permanently adapt to new mechanical environments because chemical signaling pathways are short-lived. We visualize force-induced changes in nuclear rheology to examine short- and long-time genome organization and movements. Punctate labels in the nuclear interior of HeLa, human umbilical vein endothelial, and osteosarcoma (Saos-2) cells allow tracking of nuclear movements in cells under varying levels of shear and compressive force. Under adequate shear stress two distinct regimes develop in cells under mechanical stimulation: an initial event of increased intranuclear movement followed by a regime of intranuclear movements that reflect the dose of applied force. At early times there is a nondirectionally oriented response with a small increase in nuclear translocations. After 30 min, there is a significant increase in nuclear movements, which scales with the amount of shear or compressive stress. The similarities in the nuclear response to shear and compressive stress suggest that the nucleus is a mechanosensitive element within the cell. Thus, applied extracellular forces stimulate intranuclear movements, resulting in repositioning of nuclear bodies and the associated chromatin within the nucleus.     

Nuclear mechanics in differentiation and development

The nucleus is by far one of the stiffest organelles within cells of higher eukaryotes. Its mechanical properties are determined by contributions from the nuclear lamina and chromatin. Together they allow a viscoelastic response of the nucleus to applied stresses, where the lamina is thought to behave as an elastic shell, while the nucleoplasm contributes as a largely viscous material. Nuclear mechanics changes during differentiation and development. Altered nuclear mechanics reflects but might also influence global re-arrangements in chromatin architecture, which take place when cells commit themselves into distinct lineages. Thus it is likely that the mechanical characteristics of nuclei significantly contribute to proper differentiation.     

Distribution of proteins between nucleus and cytoplasm of amoeba proteus

By transplanting nuclei between labeled and unlabeled cells, we determined the localization of the major proteins of amebas and described certain features of their intracellular distributon. We identified approximately 130 cellular proteins by fluorography of one-dimensional polyacrylamide electrophoretic gels and found that slightly less than half of them (designated NP, for nuclear proteins) are almost exclusively nuclear. About 95 percent of the other proteins (designated CP for cytoplamsic proteins) are roughly equally concentrated in nucleus and cytoplasm, but—because the cytoplasm is 50 times larger than the nucleus—about 98 percent of each of the latter is in the cytoplasm. Of the CP, roughly 5 percent are not detectable in the nucleus. Assuming that these are restricted to the cytoplasm only because, for example, they are in structures too large to enter the nucleus and labeled CP readily exit a nucleus introduced into unlabeled cytoplasm, we conclude that the nuclear envelope does not limit the movement of any nonstructural cellular protein in either direction between the two compartments. Some NP are not found in the cytoplasm (although ostensibly synthesized there) presumably because of preferential binding within the nucleus. Almost one half of the protein mass in nuclei in vivo is CP and apparently only proteins of that group are lost from nuclei when cells are lysed. Thus, while an extracellular environment allows CP to exit isolated nuclei, the nuclear binding affinities for NP are retained. Further examination of NP distribution shows that many NP species are, in fact, detectable in the cytoplasm (although at only about 1/300 the nuclear concentration), apparently because the nuclear affinity is relatively low. These proteins are electrophoretically distinguishable from the high-affinity NP not found in the cytoplasm. New experiments show that an earlier suggestion that the nuclear transplantation operation causes an artifactual release of NP to the cytoplasm is largely incorrect. Moreover, we show that cytoplasmic “contamination” of nuclear preparations is not a factor in classifying proteins by these nuclear transplantation experiments. We speculate the no mechanism has evolved to confine most CP to the cytoplasm (where they presumably function exclusively) because the cytoplasm’s large volume ensures that CP will be abundant there. Extending Bonner’s idea of “quasi-functional nuclear binding sites” for NP, we suggest that a subset of NP usually have a low affinity for available intranuclear sites because their main function(s) occurs at other intranuclear sites to which they bind tightly only when particular metabolic conditions demand. The other NP (those completely absent from cytoplasm) presumable always are bound with high affinity at their primary functional sites.