Membrane protein folding and oligomerization: the two-stage model.

We discuss the view that the folding of many, perhaps most, integral membrane proteins can be considered as a two-stage process. In stage I, hydrophobic alpha-helices are established across the lipid bilayer. In stage II, they interact to form functional transmembrane structures. This model is suggested by the nature of transmembrane segments in known structures, refolding experiments, the assembly of integral membrane protein from fragments, and the existence of very small integral membrane protein subunits. It may extend to proteins with a variety of functions, including the formation of transmembrane aqueous channels. The model is discussed in the context of the forces involved in membrane protein folding and the interpretation of sequence data.     

Optimal bundling of transmembrane helices using sparse distance constraints

We present a two-step approach to modeling the transmembrane spanning helical bundles of integral membrane proteins using only sparse distance constraints, such as those derived from chemical cross-linking, dipolar EPR and FRET experiments. In Step 1, using an algorithm, we developed, the conformational space of membrane protein folds matching a set of distance constraints is explored to provide initial structures for local conformational searches. In Step 2, these structures refined against a custom penalty function that incorporates both measures derived from statistical analysis of solved membrane protein structures and distance constraints obtained from experiments. We begin by describing the statistical analysis of the solved membrane protein structures from which the theoretical portion of the penalty function was derived. We then describe the penalty function, and, using a set of six test cases, demonstrate that it is capable of distinguishing helical bundles that are close to the native bundle from those that are far from the native bundle. Finally, using a set of only 27 distance constraints extracted from the literature, we show that our method successfully recovers the structure of dark-adapted rhodopsin to within 3.2 A of the crystal structure.     

Membrane proteins: from bench to bits

Membrane proteins currently receive a lot of attention, in large part thanks to a steady stream of high-resolution X-ray structures. Although the first few structures showed proteins composed of tightly packed bundles of very hydrophobic more or less straight transmembrane α-helices, we now know that helix-bundle membrane proteins can be both highly flexible and contain transmembrane segments that are neither very hydrophobic nor necessarily helical throughout their lengths. This raises questions regarding how membrane proteins are inserted into the membrane and fold in vivo, and also complicates life for bioinformaticians trying to predict membrane protein topology and structure.     

Structural comparison and classification of alpha‐helical transmembrane domains based on helix interaction patterns

Structural classification of membrane proteins is still in its infancy due to the relative paucity of available three‐dimensional structures compared with soluble proteins. However, recent technological advances in protein structure determination have led to a significant increase in experimentally known membrane protein folds, warranting exploration of the structural universe of membrane proteins. Here, a new and completely membrane protein specific structural classification system is introduced that classifies α‐helical membrane proteins according to common helix architectures. Each membrane protein is represented by a helix interaction graph depicting transmembrane helices with their pairwise interactions resulting from individual residue contacts. Subsequently, proteins are clustered according to similarities among these helix interaction graphs using a newly developed structural similarity score called HISS. As HISS scores explicitly disregard structural properties of loop regions, they are more suitable to capture conserved transmembrane helix bundle architectures than other structural similarity scores. Importantly, we are able to show that a classification approach based on helix interaction similarity closely resembles conventional structural classification databases such as SCOP and CATH implying that helix interactions are one of the major determinants of α‐helical membrane protein folds. Furthermore, the classification of all currently available membrane protein structures into 20 recurrent helix architectures and 15 singleton proteins demonstrates not only an impressive variability of membrane helix bundles but also the conservation of common helix interaction patterns among proteins with distinctly different sequences. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A CD study of uncoupling protein-1 and its transmembrane and matrix-loop domains

Conformations of the prototypic UCP-1 (uncoupling protein-1) and its TM (transmembrane) and ML (matrix-loop) domains were studied by CD spectroscopy. Recombinant, untagged mouse UCP-1 and a hexahistidine-tagged version of the protein were obtained in high purity following their overexpression in Escherichia coli. The TM and ML domains of hamster UCP-1 were chemically synthesized. Conformations of both recombinant UCP-1 proteins were dominantly helical (40-50%) in digitonin micelles. Binding of the purine nucleotides GDP and GTP to UCP-1, detected in the near-UV CD region, supported the existence of the functional form of the protein in digitonin micelles. All individual TM and ML peptides, except the third ML domain, adopted helical structures in aqueous trifluoroethanol, which implies that, in addition to six TM segments, at least two of the ML domains of the UCP-1 can form helical structures in membrane interface regions. TM and ML domains interacted with vesicles composed of the main phospholipids of the inner membrane of mitochondria, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine and cardiolipin, to adopt dominantly beta- and/or unordered conformations. Mixtures of UCP-1 peptide domains spontaneously associated in aqueous, phospholipid vesicles and digitonin micelle environments to form ordered conformations, which exhibited common features with the conformations of the full-length proteins. Thermal denaturations of UCP-1 and its nine-peptide-domain assembly in digitonin were co-operative but not reversible. Assembly of six TM domains in lipid bilayers formed ion-conducting units with possible helical bundle conformations. Consequently, covalent connection between peptide domains, tight domain interactions and TM potential are essential for the formation of the functional conformation of UCP-1.     

Simulation studies on bacteriorhodopsin bundle of transmembrane α segments

Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) is a membrane protein which pumps protons through the plasma membrane. Seven transmembrane BR helical segments are subjected to simulation studies in order to investigate the packing process of transmembrane helices. A Monte Carlo simulated annealing protocol is employed to optimize the helix bundle system. Helix packing is optimized according to a semi-empirical potential mainly composed of six components: a bilayer potential, a crossing angle potential, a helix dipole potential, a helix-helix distance potential, a helix orientation potential and a helix-helix distance restraint potential (a loop potential). Necessary parameters are derived from theoretical studies and statistical analysis of experimentally determined protein structures. The structures from the simulations are compared with the experimentally determined structures in terms of geometry. The structures generated show similar shapes to the experimentally suggested structure even without the helix-helix distance restraint potential. However, the relative locations of individual helices were reproduced only when the helix-helix distance restraint potential was used with restraint conditions. Our results suggest that transmembrane helix bundles resembling those observed experimentally may be generated by simulations using simple potentials. Received: 19 April 1999 / Revised version: 6 September 1999 / Accepted: 17 September 1999     

Strategies for dealing with conformational sampling in structural calculations of flexible or kinked transmembrane peptides.

Peptides corresponding to transmembrane (TM) segments from membrane proteins provide a potential route for the determination of membrane protein structure. We have determined that 2 functionally critical TM segments from the mammalian Na+/H+ exchanger display well converged structure in regions separated by break points. The flexibility of these break points results in conformational sampling in solution. A brief review of available NMR structures of helical membrane proteins demonstrates that there are a number of published structures showing similar properties. Such flexibility is likely indicative of kinks in the full-length protein. This minireview focuses on methods and protocols for NMR structure calculation and analysis of peptide structures under conditions of conformational sampling. The methods outlined allow the identification and analysis of structured peptides containing break points owing to conformational sampling and the differentiation between oligomerization and ensemble-averaged observation of multiple peptide conformations.     

D(n)-symmetrical tertiary templates for the design of tubular proteins

Antiparallel helical bundles are found in a wide range of proteins. Often, four-helical bundles form tube-like structures, with binding sites for substrates or cofactors near their centers. For example, a transmembrane four-helical bundle in cytochrome bc(1) binds a pair of porphyrins in an elongated central cavity running down the center of the structure. Antiparallel helical barrels with larger diameters are found in the crystal structures of TolC and DSD, which form antiparallel 12-helical and six-helical bundles, respectively. The backbone geometries of the helical bundles of cytochrome bc(1), TolC, and DSD are well described using a simple D(n)-symmetrical model with only eight adjustable parameters. This parameterization provides an excellent starting point for construction of minimal models of these proteins as well as the de novo design of proteins with novel functions.     

kPROT: a knowledge-based scale for the propensity of residue orientation in transmembrane segments. Application to membrane protein structure prediction

Modeling of integral membrane proteins and the prediction of their functional sites requires the identification of transmembrane (TM) segments and the determination of their angular orientations. Hydrophobicity scales predict accurately the location of TM helices, but are less accurate in computing angular disposition. Estimating lipid-exposure propensities of the residues from statistics of solved membrane protein structures has the disadvantage of relying on relatively few proteins. As an alternative, we propose here a scale of knowledge-based Propensities for Residue Orientation in Transmembrane segments (kPROT), derived from the analysis of more than 5000 non-redundant protein sequences. We assume that residues that tend to be exposed to the membrane are more frequent in TM segments of single-span proteins, while residues that prefer to be buried in the transmembrane bundle interior are present mainly in multi-span TMs. The kPROT value for each residue is thus defined as the logarithm of the ratio of its proportions in single and multiple TM spans. The scale is refined further by defining it for three discrete sections of the TM segment; namely, extracellular, central, and intracellular. The capacity of the kPROT scale to predict angular helical orientation was compared to that of alternative methods in a benchmark test, using a diversity of multi-span alpha-helical transmembrane proteins with a solved 3D structure. kPROT yielded an average angular error of 41 degrees, significantly lower than that of alternative scales (62 degrees -68 degrees ). The new scale thus provides a useful general tool for modeling and prediction of functional residues in membrane proteins. A WWW server (http://bioinfo.weizmann.ac.il/kPROT) is available for automatic helix orientation prediction with kPROT.     

Structures of the transmembrane helices of the G-protein coupled receptor, rhodopsin.

An hypothesis is tested that individual peptides corresponding to the transmembrane helices of the membrane protein, rhodopsin, would form helices in solution similar to those in the native protein. Peptides containing the sequences of helices 1, 4 and 5 of rhodopsin were synthesized. Two peptides, with overlapping sequences at their termini, were synthesized to cover each of the helices. The peptides from helix 1 and helix 4 were helical throughout most of their length. The N- and C-termini of all the peptides were disordered and proline caused opening of the helical structure in both helix 1 and helix 4. The peptides from helix 5 were helical in the middle segment of each peptide, with larger disordered regions in the N- and C-termini than for helices 1 and 4. These observations show that there is a strong helical propensity in the amino acid sequences corresponding to the transmembrane domain of this G-protein coupled receptor. In the case of the peptides from helix 4, it was possible to superimpose the structures of the overlapping sequences to produce a construct covering the whole of the sequence of helix 4 of rhodopsin. As similar superposition for the peptides from helix 1 also produced a construct, but somewhat less successfully because of the disordering in the region of sequence overlap. This latter problem was more severe for helix 5 and therefore a single peptide was synthesized for the entire sequence of this helix, and its structure determined. It proved to be helical throughout. Comparison of all these structures with the recent crystal structure of rhodopsin revealed that the peptide structures mimicked the structures seen in the whole protein. Thus similar studies of peptides may provide useful information on the secondary structure of other transmembrane proteins built around helical bundles.     

Membrane fusion machines of paramyxoviruses: capture of intermediates of fusion

Peptides derived from heptad repeat regions adjacent to the fusion peptide and transmembrane domains of many viral fusion proteins form stable helical bundles and inhibit fusion specifically. Paramyxovirus SV5 fusion (F) protein-mediated fusion and its inhibition by the peptides N-1 and C-1 were analyzed. The temperature dependence of fusion by F suggests that thermal energy, destabilizing proline residues and receptor binding by the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein collectively contribute to F activation from a metastable native state. F-mediated fusion was reversibly arrested by low temperature or membrane-incorporated lipids, and the resulting F intermediates were characterized. N-1 inhibited an earlier F intermediate than C-1. Co-expression of HN with F lowered the temperature required to attain the N-1-inhibited intermediate, consistent with HN binding to its receptor stimulating a conformational change in F. C-1 bound and inhibited an intermediate of F that could be detected until a point directly preceding membrane merger. The data are consistent with C-1 binding a pre-hairpin intermediate of F and with helical bundle formation being coupled directly to membrane fusion.     

Structural and functional characterization of transmembrane segment VII of the Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1

The Na(+)/H(+) exchanger isoform 1 is an integral membrane protein that regulates intracellular pH by exchanging one intracellular H(+) for one extracellular Na(+). It is composed of an N-terminal membrane domain of 12 transmembrane segments and an intracellular C-terminal regulatory domain. We characterized the structural and functional aspects of the critical transmembrane segment VII (TM VII, residues 251-273) by using alanine scanning mutagenesis and high resolution NMR. Each residue of TM VII was mutated to alanine, the full-length protein expressed, and its activity characterized. TM VII was sensitive to mutation. Mutations at 13 of 22 residues resulted in severely reduced activity, whereas other mutants exhibited varying degrees of decreases in activity. The impaired activities sometimes resulted from low expression and/or low surface targeting. Three of the alanine scanning mutant proteins displayed increased, and two displayed decreased resistance to the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger isoform 1 inhibitor EMD87580. The structure of a peptide of TM VII was determined by using high resolution NMR in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. TM VII is predominantly alpha-helical, with a break in the helix at the functionally critical residues Gly(261)-Glu(262). The relative positions and orientations of the N- and C-terminal helical segments are seen to vary about this extended segment in the ensemble of NMR structures. Our results show that TM VII is a critical transmembrane segment structured as an interrupted helix, with several residues that are essential to both protein function and sensitivity to inhibition.     

Structure of a flavivirus envelope glycoprotein in its low-pH-induced membrane fusion conformation

Enveloped viruses enter cells via a membrane fusion reaction driven by conformational changes of specific viral envelope proteins. We report here the structure of the ectodomain of the tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope glycoprotein, E, a prototypical class II fusion protein, in its trimeric low-pH-induced conformation. We show that, in the conformational transition, the three domains of the neutral-pH form are maintained but their relative orientation is altered. Similar to the postfusion class I proteins, the subunits rearrange such that the fusion peptide loops cluster at one end of an elongated molecule and the C-terminal segments, connecting to the viral transmembrane region, run along the sides of the trimer pointing toward the fusion peptide loops. Comparison with the low-pH-induced form of the alphavirus class II fusion protein reveals striking differences at the end of the molecule bearing the fusion peptides, suggesting an important conformational effect of the missing membrane connecting segment.     

Current status of membrane protein structure classification

For over 2 decades, continuous efforts to organize the jungle of available protein structures have been underway. Although a number of discrepancies between different classification approaches for soluble proteins have been reported, the classification of membrane proteins has so far not been comparatively studied because of the limited amount of available structural data. Here, we present an analysis of α‐helical membrane protein classification in the SCOP and CATH databases. In the current set of 63 α‐helical membrane protein chains having between 1 and 13 transmembrane helices, we observed a number of differently classified proteins both regarding their domain and fold assignment. The majority of all discrepancies affect single transmembrane helix, two helix hairpin, and four helix bundle domains, while domains with more than five helices are mostly classified consistently between SCOP and CATH. It thus appears that the structural constraints imposed by the lipid bilayer complicate the classification of membrane proteins with only few membrane‐spanning regions. This problem seems to be specific for membrane proteins as soluble four helix bundles, not restrained by the membrane, are more consistently classified by SCOP and CATH. Our findings indicate that the structural space of small membrane helix bundles is highly continuous such that even minor differences in individual classification procedures may lead to a significantly different classification. Membrane proteins with few helices and limited structural diversity only seem to be reasonably classifiable if the definition of a fold is adapted to include more fine‐grained structural features such as helix–helix interactions and reentrant regions. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Structural analysis of synthetic peptide fragments from EmrE,a multidrug resistance protein,in a membrane-mimetic environment

EmrE, a multidrug resistance protein from Escherichia coli, renders the bacterium resistant to a variety of cytotoxic drugs by active translocation out of the cell. The 110-residue sequence of EmrE limits the number of structural possibilities that can be envisioned for this membrane protein. Four helix bundle models have been considered [Yerushalmi, H., Lebendiker, M., and Schuldiner, S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31044-31048]. The validity of EmrE structural models has been probed experimentally by investigations on overlapping peptides (ranging in length from 19 to 27 residues), derived from the sequence of EmrE. The choice of peptides was made to provide sequences of two complete, predicted transmembrane helices (peptides H1 and H3) and two helix-loop-helix motifs (peptides A and B). Peptide (B) also corresponds to a putative hairpin in a speculative beta-barrel model, with the "Pro-Thr-Gly" segment forming a turn. Structure determination in SDS micelles using NMR indicates peptide H1 to be predominantly helical, with helix boundaries in the micellar environment corroborating predicted helical limits. Peptide A adopts a helix-loop-helix structure in SDS micelles, and peptide B was also largely helical in micellar environments. An analogue peptide, C, in which the central "Pro-Thr-Gly" was replaced by "(D)Pro-Gly" displays local turn conformation at the (D)Pro-Gly segment, but neither a continuous helical stretch nor beta-hairpin formation was observed. This study implies that the constraints of membrane and micellar environments largely direct the structure of transmembrane peptides and proteins and study of judiciously selected peptide fragments can prove useful in the structural elucidation of membrane proteins.     

Alpha-hairpin stability and folding of transmembrane segments

Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations at low dielectric constant have been carried out for peptides matching the double spanning segments of transmembrane proteins. Different folding dynamics have been observed. The peptides folded into the stable helix-turn-helix conformation-alpha-hairpin-with antiparallel-oriented strands or unstable alpha-hairpin conformation that unfolded later into the straight helical structure. The peptide having flexible residues in the TM helices often misfolded into a tangled structure that can be avoided by restricting the flexibility of these residues. General conclusions can be drawn from the observed folding dynamics. The stability and folding of some double spanning transmembrane fragments are self-assembling. The following and/or neighboring peptide chains of the protein may support the stability of the hairpin structure of other fragments. The stability of the TM helices containing flexible residues could be maintained due to contacts with neighboring TM segments.     

Perspective: peptides as mimics of transmembrane segments in proteins.

Peptide-based approaches to protein structure within membranes have proven enormously valuable. When one focusses on the detailed manner through which membrane proteins actually traverse the cell bilayer, a simple observation emerges: helical peptide segments of 20 amino acids each constitute the only tangible connection between the inside and outside of the cell. Thus, a major step towards understanding the key relationships between biological function and membrane protein structure can be taken through characterization, by composition, sequence, chain length, hydrophobicity and conformation, of hydrophobic peptides designed as mimics of transmembrane segments.     

Dissecting membrane protein architecture: An annotation of structural complexity

α‐Helical membrane proteins exist in an anisotropic environment which strongly influences their folding, stability, and architecture, which is far more complex than a simple bundle of transmembrane helices, notably due to helix deformations, prosthetic groups and extramembrane structures. However, the role and the distribution of such heterogeneity in the supra molecular organization of membrane proteins remains poorly investigated. Using a nonredundant subset of α‐helical membrane proteins, we have annotated and analyze the statistics of several types of new elements such as incomplete helices, intramembrane loops, helical extensions of helical transmembrane domains, extracellular loops, and helices lying parallel to the membrane surface. The relevance of the annotation scheme was studied using residue composition, statistics, physical chemistry, and symmetry of their distribution in relation to the immediate membrane environment. Calculation of hydrophobicity using different scales show that different structural elements appear to have affinities coherent with their position in the membrane. Examination of the annotation scheme suggests that there is considerable information content in the amino acid compositions of the different elements suggesting that it might be useful for structural prediction. More importantly, the proposed annotation will help to decipher the complex hierarchy of interactions involved in membrane protein architecture. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 815–829, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com