DNA methylation and chromatin structure regulate T cell perforin gene expression

Perforin is a cytotoxic effector molecule expressed in NK cells and a subset of T cells. The mechanisms regulating its expression are incompletely understood. We observed that DNA methylation inhibition could increase perforin expression in T cells, so we examined the methylation pattern and chromatin structure of the human perforin promoter and upstream enhancer in primary CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells as well as in an NK cell line that expresses perforin, compared with fibroblasts, which do not express perforin. The entire region was nearly completely unmethylated in the NK cell line and largely methylated in fibroblasts. In contrast, only the core promoter was constitutively unmethylated in primary CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells, and expression was associated with hypomethylation of an area residing between the upstream enhancer at -1 kb and the distal promoter at -0.3 kb. Treating T cells with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine selectively demethylated this area and increased perforin expression. Selective methylation of this region suppressed promoter function in transfection assays. Finally, perforin expression and hypomethylation were associated with localized sensitivity of the 5' flank to DNase I digestion, indicating an accessible configuration. These results indicate that DNA methylation and chromatin structure participate in the regulation of perforin expression in T cells.     

Carcinogenic nickel silences gene expression by chromatin condensation and DNA methylation: a new model for epigenetic carcinogens.

A transgenic gpt+ Chinese hamster cell line (G12) was found to be susceptible to carcinogenic nickel-induced inactivation of gpt expression without mutagenesis or deletion of the transgene. Many nickel-induced 6-thioguanine-resistant variants spontaneously reverted to actively express gpt, as indicated by both reversion assays and direct enzyme measurements. Since reversion was enhanced in many of the nickel-induced variant cell lines following 24-h treatment with the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine, the involvement of DNA methylation in silencing gpt expression was suspected. This was confirmed by demonstrations of increased DNA methylation, as well as by evidence indicating condensed chromatin and heterochromatinization of the gpt integration site in 6-thioguanine-resistant cells. Upon reversion to active gpt expression, DNA methylation and condensation are lost. We propose that DNA condensation and methylation result in heterochromatinization of the gpt sequence with subsequent inheritance of the now silenced gene. This mechanism is supported by direct evidence showing that acute nickel treatment of cultured cells, and of isolated nuclei in vitro, can indeed facilitate gpt sequence-specific chromatin condensation. Epigenetic mechanisms have been implicated in the actions of some nonmutagenic carcinogens, and DNA methylation changes are now known to be important in carcinogenesis. This paper further supports the emerging theory that nickel is a human carcinogen that can alter gene expression by enhanced DNA methylation and compaction, rather than by mutagenic mechanisms.     

Methods for analyzing the role of DNA methylation and chromatin structure in regulating T lymphocyte gene expression

Chromatin structure, determined in part by DNA methylation, is established during differentiation and prevents expression of genes unnecessary for the function of a given cell type. We reported that DNA methylation and chromatin structure contributes to lymphoidspecific ITGAL (CD11a) and PRF1 (perforin) expression. We used bisulfite sequencing to compare methylation patterns in the ITGAL promoter and 5′ flanking region of T cells and fibroblasts, and in the PRF1 promoter and upstream enhancer of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with fibroblasts. The effects of methylation on promoter function were tested using regional methylation of reporter constructs, and confirmed by DNA methyltransferase inhibition. The relationship between DNA methylation and chromatin structure was analyzed by DNaseI hypersensitivity. Herein we described the methods and results in greater detail. Published: September 16, 2004.     

Chemoenzymatic labeling of DNA methylation patterns for single-molecule epigenetic mapping

DNA methylation, specifically, methylation of cytosine (C) nucleotides at the 5-carbon position (5-mC), is the most studied and significant epigenetic modification. Here we developed a chemoenzymatic procedure to fluorescently label non-methylated cytosines in CpG context, allowing epigenetic profiling of single DNA molecules spanning hundreds of thousands of base pairs. We used a CpG methyltransferase with a synthetic S-adenosyl-l-methionine cofactor analog to transfer an azide to cytosines instead of the natural methyl group. A fluorophore was then clicked onto the DNA, reporting on the amount and position of non-methylated CpGs. We found that labeling efficiency was increased up to 2-fold by the addition of a nucleosidase, presumably by degrading the inactive by-product of the cofactor after labeling, preventing its inhibitory effect. We used the method to determine the decline in global DNA methylation in a chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient and then performed whole-genome methylation mapping of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our genome maps show high concordance with published bisulfite sequencing methylation maps. Although mapping resolution is limited by optical detection to 500–1000 bp, the labeled DNA molecules produced by this approach are hundreds of thousands of base pairs long, allowing access to long repetitive and structurally variable genomic regions.     

DNA methylation as a regulatory mechanism in rat gamma-crystallin gene expression.

We have investigated the methylation state of the rat gamma-crystallin genes in DNA from lens cells at different developmental stages as well as from kidney and heart cells. A clear correlation between the extent of demethylation of the promoter and 5' gene regions and the expression of these genes was observed. No change in the methylation state of the far upstream or 3' regions of the genes was seen. The demethylation of the promoter region was shown to occur during the differentiation from the lens epithelial to the lens fiber cell. The effect of cytosine methylation on gamma-crystallin promoter activity was tested by measuring gamma-crystallin promoter/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase fusion gene expression after in vitro primed repair synthesis of the promoter region in the presence of either dCTP or 5mdCTP. The hemimethylated promoter was no longer capable of promoting high CAT activity after introduction into lens-like cells. Taken together, our data suggest that DNA demethylation may be the determining step in the developmental stage-specific expression of the rat gamma-crystallin genes.     

DNA methylation and chromatin structure: a view from below

An understanding of the function and control of DNA methylation in eukaryotes has been elusive. Studies of Neurospora crassa have led to a model that accounts for the chromosomal distribution of methylation and suggests a basic function for DNA methylation in eukaryotes.     

Parent-of-origin effects on gene expression and DNA methylation in the maize endosperm

Imprinting describes the differential expression of alleles based on their parent of origin. Deep sequencing of RNAs from maize (Zea mays) endosperm and embryo tissue 14 d after pollination was used to identify imprinted genes among a set of ~12,000 genes that were expressed and contained sequence polymorphisms between the B73 and Mo17 genotypes. The analysis of parent-of-origin patterns of expression resulted in the identification of 100 putative imprinted genes in maize endosperm, including 54 maternally expressed genes (MEGs) and 46 paternally expressed genes (PEGs). Three of these genes have been previously identified as imprinted, while the remaining 97 genes represent novel imprinted maize genes. A genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation identified regions with reduced endosperm DNA methylation in, or near, 19 of the 100 imprinted genes. The reduced levels of DNA methylation in endosperm are caused by hypomethylation of the maternal allele for both MEGs and PEGs in all cases tested. Many of the imprinted genes with reduced DNA methylation levels also show endosperm-specific expression patterns. The imprinted maize genes were compared with imprinted genes identified in genome-wide screens of rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis thaliana, and at least 10 examples of conserved imprinting between maize and each of the other species were identified.     

DNA methylation and gene expression profiles characterize epigenetic regulation of lncRNAs in colon adenocarcinoma

The long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are associated with tumorigenesis and progression of cancer. While DNA methylation is a common epigenetic regulator of gene expression, the methylation of lncRNAs was rarely studied. To address this gap, we integrated DNA methylation and RNA-seq data to characterize the landscape of lncRNA methylation in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). We collected and analyzed the lncRNA expression and methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia to identify the epigenetically regulated lncRNAs. We further investigated the biological and clinical relevance of the identified lncRNAs via bioinformatics analysis. We identified 20 epigenetically upregulated lncRNAs in COAD, including several well-studied lncRNAs whose methylation regulation were poorly investigated, such as PVT1 and UCA1. We also revealed several novel tumor-associated lncRNAs in COAD, including GATA2-As1 and CYTOR. Next, we explored their biology function using gene set enrichment analysis and competitive endogenous RNA analysis. We characterized the methylation landscape of lncRNA in COAD and identified 20 epigenetically upregulated lncRNAs. Our findings will shed new light on the epigenetic regulation of lncRNA expression by DNA methylation.     

DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance

Mammalian cell lines silence genes at low frequency by the methylation of promoter sequences. These silent genes can be reactivated at high frequency by the demethylating agent 5-azacytidine (5-aza-CR). The inactive and active epigenetic states of such genes are stably inherited. A method for silencing genes is now available. It involves treatment of permeabilized cells with 5-methyl deoxycytidine triphosphate (5-methyl dCTP) which is incorporated into DNA. The methylation of promoter sequences has been confirmed using the bisulfite genomic sequencing procedure. Methylated oligonucleotides homologous to promoter sequences might be used to specifically target and silence given genes, but results so far have not been conclusive. Treatments that silence or reactivate genes by changing DNA methylation can be referred to as epimutagens, as distinct from mutagens that act by changing DNA sequences. The epimutagen 5-aza-CR reactivates genes but has little mutagenic activity, whereas standard mutagens (such as ethyl methane sulfonate and ultraviolet light) have little reactivation activity. Nevertheless, much more information is required about the effects of DNA-damaging agents in changing DNA methylation and gene activity and also about the role of epimutations in tumor progression.     

DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance

Classical genetics has revealed the mechanisms for the transmission of genes from generation to generation, but the strategy of the genes in unfolding the developmental programme remains obscure. Epigenetics comprises the study of the mechanisms that impart temporal and spatial control on the activities of all those genes required for the development of a complex organism from the zygote to the adult. Epigenetic changes in gene activity can be studied in relation to DNA methylation in cultured mammalian cells and it is also possible to isolate and characterize mutants with altered DNA methylase activity. Although this experimental system is quite far removed from the epigenetic controls acting during development it does provide the means to clarify the rules governing the silencing of genes by specific DNA methylation and their reactivation by demethylation. This in turn will facilitate studies on the control of gene expression in somatic cells of the developing organism or the adult. The general principles of epigenetic mechanisms can be defined. There are extreme contrasts between instability or switches in gene expression, such as those in stem-line cells, and the stable heritability of a specialized pattern of gene activities. In some situations cell lineages are known to be important, whereas in others coordinated changes in groups of cells have been demonstrated. Control of numbers of cell divisions and the size of organisms, or parts of organisms, is also essential. The epigenetic determination of gene expression can be reversed or reprogrammed in the germ line. The extent to which methylation or demethylation of specific DNA sequences can help explain these basic epigenetic mechanisms is briefly reviewed.     

DNA methylation and epigenetic mechanisms

Genes are essential for the transmission of genetic information from generation to generation, and this mechanism of inheritance is fully understood. Genes are also essential for unfolding the genetic program for development, but the rules governing this process are obscure. Epigenetics comprises the study of the switching on and off of genes during development, the segregation of gene activities following somatic cell division, and the stable inheritance of a given spectrum of gene activities in specific cells. Some of these processes may be explained by DNA modification, particularly changes in the pattern of DNA methylation and the heritability of that pattern. There is strong evidence that DNA methylation plays an important role in the control of gene activity in cultured mammalian cells, and the properties of a CHO mutant strain affected in DNA methylation are described. Human diploid cells progressively lose cytosine methylation during serial subculture, and this may be related to their in vitro senescence. There is also evidence that DNA modifications can be inherited through the germ line. Classical genetics is based on the study of all types of change in DNA base sequence, but the rules governing the activity of genes by epigenetic mechanisms are necessarily different. Their elucidation will depend both on a theoretical framework for development and on experimental studies at the molecular, chromosomal, and cellular levels.     

Cell-specific epigenetic regulation of ChM-I gene expression: crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone acetylation

The expression of the chondromodulin-I (ChM-I) gene, a cartilage-specific gene, is regulated by the binding of Sp3 to the core promoter region, which is inhibited by the methylation of CpG in the target genome in the osteogenic lineage, osteosarcoma (OS) cells. The histone tails associated with the hypermethylated promoter region of the ChM-I gene were deacetylated by histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) in three ChM-I-negative OS cell lines. Treatment with an HDAC inhibitor induced the binding of Sp3 in one cell line, which became ChM-I-positive. This process was associated with acetylation instead of the dimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3-K9) and, surprisingly, the demethylation of the core promoter region. The demethylation was transient, and gradually replaced by methylation after a rapid recovery of histone deacetylaion. These results represent an example of the plasticity of differentiation being regulated by the cell-specific plasticity of epigenetic regulation.