Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites

Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms of fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at both supraspinal and spinal sites. In the mouse tail-flick test, the antinociceptive effects induced by both fentanyl and morphine were blocked by either the mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the mu1/mu2-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) after s.c., i.c.v. or i.t. injection. In contrast, both fentanyl and morphine given i.c.v. or i.t. failed to produce antinociception in mu1-deficient CXBK mice. These findings indicate that like morphine, the antinociception induced by fentanyl may be mediated predominantly through mu1-opioid receptors at both supraspinal and spinal sites in mice. We also determined the ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception in mice. The ED50 values for s.c.-, i.c.v.- and i.t.-administered fentanyl-induced antinociception were 73.7, 18.5 and 1.2-fold lower than that of morphine, respectively. The present data clearly suggest the usefulness of peripheral treatment with fentanyl for the control of pain.     

Effects of neomycin on the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception.

The effects of neomycin on the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception were examined in mice. Because neomycin did not readly cross blood brain barrier, we examined the effects of neomycin following systemic, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) and intrathecal (i.t.) injections on the morphine tolerance. Daily subcutaneous (s.c.), i.c.v. and i.t. injections of morphine produced tolerance regardless of route of administration. Both i.c.v. and i.t. neomycin, which alone produced no changes in the basal tail flick latencies, significantly attenuated the development of tolerance to antinociception produced by repeated systemic morphine, while intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of neomycin did not affect morphine tolerance. Further, i.c.v. and i.t. neomycin attenuated the development of tolerance to antinociception produced by repeated i.c.v. and i.t. morphine, respectively, which were not attenuated by systemic neomycin. This results indicate a potential role for neomycin-sensitive Ca2+ channels on the development of tolerance to the morphine antinoception.     

Antinociceptive effects of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II, a highly selective delta agonist in vivo

The present study has characterized the antinociceptive actions of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration in the mouse tail-flick test. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced dose- and time-related antinociception, with maximal effects at +10 min and significant antinociception which lasted for 40-60 min. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II was 13-fold more potent than i.c.v. [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), a second highly selective delta agonist, and approximately equipotent with i.c.v. morphine in producing antinociception. The antinociceptive effects of i.c.v. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE, but not those of morphine, were antagonized by the selective delta antagonist, ICI 174,864. In contrast, pretreatment with the non-equilibrium mu antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine blocked morphine antinociception, but failed to antagonize [D-Ala2]deltorphin II and DPDPE antinociception. These data indicate that [D-Ala2]deltorphin II produced its antinociceptive effects at a supraspinal delta receptor. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II appears to be the most appropriate delta opioid agonist currently available for studies in vivo and support the involvement of delta receptors in supraspinal antinociception.     

Aggravation of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug gastropathy by glucocorticoid deficiency or blockade of glucocorticoid receptors in rats

Our previous investigations suggest that the reduction of stress-induced corticosterone release, or inhibition of corticosterone actions, promotes stress-induced gastric erosions in rats. In this study the effect of glucocorticoid deficiency on susceptibility to gastric mucosal injury by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was evaluated in rats. Gastric erosions induced in male rats by indomethacin (25 mg/kg sc) or acidified aspirin (40 mM po) were studied one week after adrenalectomy with or without corticosterone replacement or after occupation of glucocorticoid receptors by the antagonist RU-38486 during the period of erosion formation. Corticosterone for replacement (4 mg/kg sc) was injected 15 min before the administration of indomethacin or acidified aspirin to adrenalectomized rats. The antagonist RU-38486 (10 mg/kg po) was administered twice, 20 min before and 60 min after NSAID administration. Plasma corticosterone levels were measured by fluorometry. Gastric erosions were quantitated by measuring the area of damage. Indomethacin or acidified aspirin induced both plasma corticosterone rise and gastric erosions. Adrenalectomy decreased both basal and NSAID-induced corticosterone levels and markedly promoted gastric erosion formation caused by the NSAID. An acute corticosterone replacement mimicking indomethacin-and aspirin-induced corticosterone rise prevented the effect of adrenalectomy on the gastric erosions. The administration of the glucocorticoid/progesterone antagonist RU-38486 significantly potentiated the formation of gastric erosions induced by indomethacin as well as aspirin. These observations suggest a gastroprotective action of glucocorticoids released in response to NSAID treatment against NSAID-induced injury.     

Attenuation of systemic morphine-induced analgesia by central administration of ghrelin and related peptides in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated 28-amino peptide secreted in the gastric endocrine cells, has been demonstrated to stimulate the release of growth hormone, increase food intake, and inhibit pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin mainly combines with its receptor (GHS-R1α) to play the role in physiological and pathological functions. It has been reported that ghrelin plays important roles in the control of pain through interaction with the opioid system in inflammatory pain and acute pain. However, very few studies show the effect of supraspinal ghrelin system on antinociception induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. In the present study, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of ghrelin (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 nmol/L) produced inhibition of systemic morphine (6 mg/kg, i.p.) analgesia in the tail withdrawal test. Similarly, i.c.v. injection GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 which are the agonists of GHS-R1α, also decreased analgesia effect induced by morphine injected intraperitoneally in mice. Furthermore, these anti-opioid activities of ghrelin and related peptides were not blocked by pretreatment with the GHS-R1α selective antagonist [d-Lys³]-GHRP-6 (100 nmol/L, i.c.v.). These results demonstrated that central ghrelin and related peptides could inhibit the analgesia effect induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. The anti-opioid effects of ghrelin and related peptides do not interact with GHS-R1a. These findings may pave the way for a new strategy on investigating the interaction between ghrelin system and opioids on pain modulation.     

Lack of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between intracerebroventricularly administered beta-endorphin and morphine or DPDPE in mice

Antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) beta-endorphin, morphine, and DPDPE (D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin) induced by a prior i.c.v. administration of beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE, respectively, were studied in mice. Acute tolerance was induced by i.c.v. pretreatment with beta-endorphin (0.58 nmol), morphine (6 nmol) and DPDPE (31 nmol) for 120, 180 and 75 min, respectively. Various doses of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE were then injected. The tail-flick and hot-plate tests were used as antinociceptive tests. Pretreatment of mice with beta-endorphin i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin, but not morphine and DPDPE. Pretreatment of mice with morphine i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to morphine but not beta-endorphin. Pretreatment of mice with DPDPE reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to DPDPE but not beta-endorphin. The results indicate that one injection of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE induces acute antinociceptive tolerance to its own distinctive opioid receptor and does not induce cross-tolerance to other opioid agonists with different opioid receptor specificities. The data support the hypothesis that beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE produce antinociception by stimulating specific epsilon, mu- and delta-opioid receptors, respectively.     

Supraspinal antinociceptive effect of apelin-13 in a mouse visceral pain model

Apelin, as the endogenous ligand of the APJ receptor, is a novel identified neuropeptide whose biological functions are not fully understood. APJ receptor mRNA was found in several brain regions related to descending control system of pain, such as amygdala, hypothalamus and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). The present study was designed to determine whether supraspinal apelin-13 may produce antinociceptive effect observed in the acetic acid-induced writhing test, a model of visceral pain. Apelin-13 not only significantly produced preemptive antinociception at the dose of 0.3, 0.5, 1 and 3μg/mouse when injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) before acetic acid, but also significantly induced antinociception at a dose of 0.5, 1 and 3μg/mouse when injected i.c.v. after acetic acid. And i.c.v. apelin-13 did not influence 30-min locomotor activity counts in mice. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of apelin-13 (1 and 3μg/mouse) significantly decreased the number of writhes, however, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of apelin-13 (10-100μg/mouse) had no effect on the number of writhes in the writhing test. The specific APJ receptor antagonist apelin-13(F13A), no-specific opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine hydrochloride (β-FNA) could significantly antagonize the antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. apelin-13, suggesting APJ receptor and μ-opioid receptor are involved in this process. Central low dose of apelin-13 (0.3μg/mouse, i.c.v.) could significantly potentiate the analgesic potencies of modest and even relatively ineffective doses of morphine administrated at supraspinal level. This enhanced antinociceptive effect was reversed by naloxone, suggesting that the potentiated analgesic response is mediated by opioid-responsive neurons.     

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeting distinct exons of the cloned mu-opioid receptor distinguish between endomorphin-1 and morphine supraspinal antinociception in mice.

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) were used to investigate the supraspinal antinociceptive effects of endomorphin-1, an endogenous peptide whose analgesic profile suggests that it is a ligand at the mu-opioid receptor. To selectively restrict the expression of this receptor, five ODN targeting distinct exons of the gene sequence were injected subchronically by the intracerebroventricular route (i.c.v.) into mice. The antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 was greatly reduced in animals receiving the ODN directed to nucleotides 677-697, which code for a sequence located on the second extracellular loop of the mu receptor. ODN-mu(un), one of the two antisense ODN directed to exon 1, also impaired endomorphin-1 antinociception. ODN targeting exons 2 and 4 were totally inactive. In contrast, all five ODN blocked the antinociception induced by morphine and beta-casomorphin. The analgesic potency of endomorphin-1, morphine, and beta-casomorphin remained unaltered by administration of an ODN to nucleotides 29-46 of the murine delta-opioid receptor gene sequence of a random-sequence ODN. This suggest the existence of diverse molecular forms for the mu-opioid receptor that mediate the antinociceptive effects of endomorphin-1 and morphine/beta-casomorphin.     

Modulation of acute morphine tolerance by corticotropin-releasing factor and dynorphin A in the mouse spinal cord.

Previously, we have demonstrated that intrathecally (i.t.) administered corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in mice produces stimulus-specific antinociception and modulation of morphine-induced antinociception by mechanisms involving spinal kappa opioid receptors. Recently, we also have found that CRF releases immunoreactive dynorphin A, a putative endogenous kappa opioid receptor agonist, from superfused mice spinal cords in vitro. Dynorphin A administered intracerebroventricularlly (i.c.v.) to mice has been shown to modulate the expression of morphine tolerance. In the present study, the possible modulatory effects of i.t. administered CRF as well as dynorphin A on morphine tolerance were studied in an acute tolerance model. Subcutaneous administration of 100 mg/kg of morphine sulfate (MS) to mice caused an acute tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception. The antinociceptive ED50 of MS was increased from 4.4 mg/kg (naive mice) to 17.9 mg/kg (4 hours after the injection of 100 mg/kg MS). To study the modulatory effects of spinally administered CRF and dynorphin A on the expression of morphine tolerance, CRF and dynorphin A were injected i.t. at 15 min and 5 min, respectively, before testing the tolerant mice by the tail-flick assay. The antinociceptive ED50 of MS in tolerant mice was decreased to 8.8 mg/kg and 7.1 mg/kg, respectively, after i.t. administration of CRF (0.1 nmol) and dynorphin A (0.2 nmol). In contrast, 0.5 nmol of alpha-helical CRF (9-41), a CRF antagonist and 0.4 nmol of norbinaltorphimine, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, when administered i.t. at 15 min before the tail-flick test in tolerant mice, increased the antinociceptive ED50 of MS to 56.6 mg/kg and 88.8 mg/kg, respectively. These data confirmed the modulatory effect of dynorphin A on morphine tolerance and suggested that CRF, which releases dynorphin A in several central nervous system regions, also plays a modulatory role in the expression of morphine tolerance.     

Analgesic effects of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 in the formalin test in mice

Two recently isolated peptides, endomorphin-1 (Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH2) and endomorphin-2 (Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2), are highly selective micro-opioid receptor agonists with analgesic actions in the tail-flick test. To further assess the analgesic properties of these peptides, the effects of endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2, and morphine were examined in the formalin test. Male Swiss Webster mice were injected i.c.v. with endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2, or morphine (0, 1, 3, 10 microg) 5 min before injection of 20 microl of 5% formalin s.c. into the plantar surface of one hind-paw. The mice were observed for 60 min after formalin injection. Endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 produced dose-dependent analgesia that was shorter in duration than for morphine. Increased locomotion was observed after morphine, but not after endomorphin-1 or endomorphin-2. These findings extend previous results and suggest that endomorphins may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of acute pain.     

Differential role of the opioid μ and δ receptors in the activation of prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) secretion by morphine in the male rat

Administration of naloxazone (50 mg/kg i.v.), an irreversible, selective and long acting antagonist of the μ₁ subclass of the opioid receptors, strongly reduced stimulation of PRL secretion by morphine (5.0 mg/kg i.v.) injected 24 hours later into conscious, unrestrained rats. In contrast, the effect of morphine on PRL release was unimpaired in rats treated 24 hours beforehand with either the reversible opioid antagonist naloxone (50 mg/kg i.v.), or the vehicle for naloxazone. A complete suppression of the PRL response to morphine (3.0 mg/kg i.v.) was observed in animals given intraventricular (IVT) injection of β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA, 2.5 μg), another selective, irreversible and long acting antagonist of the μ receptors, 24 hours beforehand. Neither naloxazone nor β-FNA had any effect on the activation of GH secretion by morphine, which, however, was conspiciously reduced by ICI 154, 129, a preferential δ receptor antagonist, injected IVT (50 μg) 5 minutes before morphine. It is concluded that the PRL stimulating effect of morphine is mediated by the μ receptors, wherease activation of GH probably involves the δ sites.     

Central mechanism underlying pressor and bradycardic effect of intracerebroventricularly injected arachidonic acid

The aim of the current study was to determine the central cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway and central thromboxane signaling in the cardiovascular effects evoked by arachidonic acid (AA). As a main control for the study, different doses of AA (75, 150, or 300?μg) were administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). Centrally injected AA dose- and time-dependently increased mean arterial pressure and decreased heart rate in conscious normotensive Sprague-Dawley rats. The maximal cardiovascular effects of AA were observed at min 10 of the injection and lasted almost 30?min. To investigate the central mechanism of the AA-induced cardiovascular effect in conscious normotensive animals, pretreatment with nonselective COX inhibitor indomethacin (200?μg; i.c.v.), thromboxane A2 (TXA2) synthesis inhibitor furegrelate (250 or 500?μg; i.c.v.), or TXA2 receptor antagonist SQ-29548 (8 or 16?μg; i.c.v.) was carried out 15?min before AA (150?μg; i.c.v.) injection. While indomethacin completely prevented the pressor and bradycardic responses to AA, furegrelate and SQ-29548 attenuated these effects in part in awake normotensive rats. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the pressor and bradycardic cardiovascular effects of centrally injected AA are dependent on COX activity being totally central and the TXA2 signaling pathway being subsequently central, at least in part.     

The role of T-type calcium channels in morphine analgesia,development of antinociceptive tolerance and dependence to morphine,and morphine abstinence syndrome

Involvement of T-type voltage dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs) on morphine antinociception, in the development of tolerance and dependence to morphine, and naloxone-precipitated abstinence syndrome in morphine dependent mice was examined by using mibefradil, a T-type VDCCs blocker. Mice were rendered tolerant and dependent on morphine by subcutaneous (s.c.) implantation of a morphine pellet containing 75 mg of morphine base for 72 hr. The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold. Coadministration of acute mibefradil (10 mg/kg, i.p.) with morphine enhanced the antinociceptive effects of acute morphine. Repeated mibefradil administration (10 mg/kg, i.p., just before, 24 and 48 hr after morphine pellet implantation) completely blocked the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine and even by this effect reached supersensitivity to morphine. However, repeated mibefradil treatment did not alter the development of dependence to morphine assessed by the A(50) values of naloxone (s.c.) required to precipitate withdrawal jumping 72 hr after morphine pellet. But, acute mibefradil (10, 30, and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) dose dependently decreased the expression of morphine abstinence syndrome when given directly 30 min prior to naloxone (0,05 mg/kg, s.c.) 72 hr after morphine pellet. These results indicate a critical role of T-type VDCCs in morphine antinociception, the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine and in morphine abstinence syndrome.     

In vivo characterization of the effects of ghrelin on the modulation of acute pain at the supraspinal level in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated peptide produced in the stomach, increases food intake and growth hormone secretion, inhibits pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin and its receptor (GHS-R1a) mRNA were found in the area related to the regions for controlling pain transmission, such as the hypothalamus, the midbrain, the spinal cord, etc. Ghrelin has been shown to have antinociceptive activity and also anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ghrelin for the first time in the acute pain modulation at the supraspinal level, using the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test in mice. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ghrelin (mouse, 0.1–3 nmol) produced a dose- and time-related antinociceptive effect in the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test, respectively. Antinociceptive effect elicited by ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol) was significantly antagonized by opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (i.c.v., 10 nmol co-injection or i.p., 10 mg/kg, 10 min prior to ghrelin) in both tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test. At these doses, naloxone significantly antagonized the antinociceptive effect induced by morphine (i.c.v., 3 nmol). Ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol)-induced antinociception was significantly antagonized by co-injection with 10 nmol [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6, the selective antagonist of GHS-R1a identified more recently, while [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6 (10 nmol) alone induced neither hyperalgesia nor antinociception. Overall this data indicate that ghrelin could produce antinociception through an interaction with GHS-R1a and with the central opioid system. Thus ghrelin may be a promising peptide for developing new analgesic drugs.     

Orexin receptor type-1 antagonist SB-334867 inhibits the development of morphine analgesic tolerance in rats

Herein the effect of orexin receptor type-1 antagonist SB-334867 on the development of tolerance to analgesic effects of morphine was studied in rats. To incite tolerance, morphine sulfate was injected intraperitoneally (i.p., 10mg/kg) once a day for 7 days. The tail flick test was used to evaluate antinociceptive effects of the morphine. A selective OxR1 receptor antagonist, SB-334867, was microinjected (i.c.v.) into the right cerebral ventricle (10 μg/10 μl) immediately before each morphine injection. Repeated morphine application resulted in tolerance to morphine analgesic effects as a decreasing trend during 7 days. Also, repeated administration of SB-334867 (i.c.v.) alone was without significant effect on the nociception as compared to control. Microinjection of SB-334867 prior to each morphine injection inhibited the development of tolerance, so that the analgesic effects of morphine were significantly higher in SB-334867 plus morphine treated rats than that of vehicle plus morphine treated ones on days 4-7. It is concluded that orexin receptor type-1 might be involved in the development of tolerance to morphine analgesic effects.     

Intravenous morphine infusion (IMF) to drug-naive, conscious rats evokes bradycardic, hypotensive effects, but pressor actions are elicited after IMF to rats previously given morphine

Hemodynamic (blood pressure and heart rate) responses of conscious drug-naive rats were studied following intravenous (i.v.) infusion of sterile saline, morphine sulphate, and then naloxone hydrochloride, as well as of other groups previously injected with morphine sulphate. Those groups chronically given morphine sulphate received twice daily injections of morphine sulphate (5 mg/kg, s.c. per injection) for 3 or 6 days before testing with the i.v. infusion of morphine sulphate. Drugs were infused (135 microL/min) through an indwelling femoral venous catheter via a Harvard infusion pump, and blood pressure was recorded from the abdominal aorta via a femoral arterial catheter. Other pretreatment studies were done to determine the receptor mechanisms mediating the blood pressure responses of drug-naive and chronic morphine-treated rats, whereby equimolar doses (0.32 mumol) of specific receptor antagonists were given as a bolus i.v. injection 5 min after saline but before subsequent infusion with morphine sulphate. Intravenous infusion of morphine sulphate (7.5 mg/kg total over 15 min) to drug-native rats caused a transient but precipitous fall in mean arterial pressure and mean heart rate with an associated rise in mean pulse pressure; these effects were blocked in other groups pretreated with atropine. Interestingly, however, rats chronically injected with morphine sulphate for 3 days previously evoked a transient pressor response when subsequently infused i.v. with morphine sulphate, actions that were blocked in other groups when pretreated i.v. with 0.32 mumol of phentolamine, yohimbine, prazosin, or guanethidine. A greater and persistent pressor response occurred following morphine infusion to groups of rats previously injected over 6 days with morphine sulphate, which was associated with tachycardia during the later stages of the 15-min morphine sulphate infusion period. The prolonged pressor and tachycardic responses of this 6-day chronically injected group were completely blocked in another group pretreated i.v. with both phentolamine and propranolol (0.32 mumol). The results suggest that morphine sulphate infusion to conscious, drug-naive rats evokes classical hypotensive effects due to decreases in mean heart rate caused by activation of parasympathetic vagal activity. With 3 or 6 days of chronic morphine sulphate administration beforehand, subsequent i.v. infusion of morphine sulphate evoked pressor actions felt to be caused by a progressive activation of the sympathetic nervous system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Reversal of the antinociceptive effects of centrally-administered morphine by the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788, were examined on analgesia induced by morphine after central (intracerebroventricular, i.c.v., or intrathecal, i.t.) and systemic administration. Analgesia was assessed in squirrel monkeys trained to respond under an electric shock tiltration procedure and in mice using the radiant heat tail-flick test. Central and systemic administration of morphine produced antinociceptive effects that were antagonized by 0.1 mg/kg of naloxone in both species. Ro 15-1788 antagonized the effects of morphine after central (i.c.v. or i.t.) administration but did not alter the effects of morphine given by the systemic route. This novel interaction suggests that Ro 15-1788 may be useful in pharmacologically separating neural substrates subserving opiate analgesia.     

Cholera and pertussis toxins inhibit differently hypothermic and anti-opioid effects of neuropeptide FF

In mice pretreated intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with pertussis or cholera toxins, effects of neuropeptide FF (NPFF), on hypothermia and morphine-induced analgesia, were assessed. NPFF and a potent NPFF agonist, 1DMe (0.005-22 nmol) injected into the lateral ventricle decreased morphine analgesia and produced naloxone (2.5 mg x kg(-1), s.c.)-resistant hypothermia after administration into the third ventricle. Cholera toxin (CTX 1 microg, i.c.v.) pretreatment (24 or 96 h before) inhibited the effect of 1DMe on body temperature, but failed to reverse its anti-opioid activity in the tail-flick test. CTX reduced hypothermia induced by a high dose of morphine (8 nmol, i.c.v.) but not the analgesic effect due to 3 nmol morphine. Pertussis toxin (PTX) pretreatment inhibited both morphine-hypothermia and -analgesia but did not modify hypothermia induced by 1DMe. The present results suggest that NPFF-induced hypothermia depends on the stimulation of Gs (but not Gi) proteins. In contrast, anti-opioid effects resulting from NPFF-receptor stimulation do not involve a cholera toxin-sensitive transducer protein.     

Characterization of the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on the DNA replication of adult rat hepatocytes growing at various cell densities

Dexamethasone inhibited the basal and EGF-stimulated DNA synthesis of adult rat hepatocytes in primary culture. The inhibition was glucocorticoid-specific: It was shown by dexamethasone and hydrocortisone, but not by progesterone, testosterone, or estradiol; and was counteracted by the glucocorticoid antagonist RU-38486 in a concentration-dependent manner. Dexamethasone acted by decreasing the rate of entry into S-phase (kG1/S), while cell cycle parameters were unaffected. The steroid was able to decrease the kG1/S severalfold even when added more than 20 hr after EGF, half-maximal effect occurring 11 hr after the addition of dexamethasone. Densely populated areas were much more sensitive to the inhibition by dexamethasone than sparsely populated areas within the same culture dish: A moderate (10 nM) concentration of dexamethasone nearly abolished the DNA synthesis in densely populated areas of hepatocyte cultures with only marginal effect on sparsely populated cells.     

A neuropeptide FF agonist blocks the acquisition of conditioned place preference to morphine in C57Bl/6J mice

Neuropeptide FF behaves as an opioid-modulating peptide that seems to be involved in morphine tolerance and physical dependence. Nevertheless, the effects of neuropeptide FF agonists on the rewarding properties of morphine remain unknown. C57BL6 mice were conditioned in an unbiased balanced paradigm of conditioned place preference to study the effect of i.c.v. injections of 1DMe (D-Tyr1(NMe)Phe3]NPFF), a stable agonist of the neuropeptide FF system, on the acquisition of place conditioning by morphine or alcohol (ethanol). Morphine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) induced a significant place preference. Injection of 1DMe (1-20 nmol), given 10 min before the i.p. injection of the reinforcing drug during conditioning, inhibited the rewarding effect of morphine but had no effect on the rewarding effect of ethanol. However, a single injection of 1DMe given just before place preference testing was unable to inhibit the rewarding effects of morphine. By itself, 1DMe was inactive but an aversive effect of this agonist could be evidenced if the experimental procedure was biased. These results suggest that neuropeptide FF, injected during conditioning, should influence the development of rewarding effects of morphine and reinforce the hypothesis of strong inhibitory interactions between neuropeptide FF and opioids.