Two-headed binding of the unphosphorylated nonmuscle heavy meromyosin.ADP complex to actin

The enzymatic and motor function of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II is activated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chains located in the head portion of myosin. Dimerization of the heads, which is brought about by the coiled-coil tail region, is essential for regulation since single-headed fragments are active regardless of the state of phosphorylation. Utilizing the fluorescence signal on binding of myosin to pyrene-labeled actin filaments, we investigated the interplay of actin and nucleotide binding to thiophosphorylated and unphosphorylated recombinant nonmuscle IIA heavy meromyosin constructs. We show that both heads of either thiophosphorylated or unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin bind very strongly to actin (K(d) < 10 nM) in the presence or absence of ADP. The heads have high and indistinguishable affinities for ADP (K(d) around 1 microM) when bound to actin. These findings are in line with the previously observed unusually loose coupling between nucleotide and actin binding to nonmuscle myosin IIA subfragment-1 (Kovács et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38132.). Furthermore, they imply that the structure of the two heads in the ternary actomyosin-ADP complex is symmetrical and that the asymmetrical structure observed in the presence of ATP and the absence of actin in previous investigations (Wendt et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4361) is likely to represent an ATPase intermediate that precedes the actomyosin-ADP state.     

ADP binding induces an asymmetry between the heads of unphosphorylated myosin

Light chain phosphorylation is the key event that regulates smooth and non-muscle myosin II ATPase activity. Here we show that both heads of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) bind tightly to actin in the absence of nucleotide, irrespective of the state of light chain phosphorylation. In striking contrast, only one of the two heads of unphosphorylated HMM binds to actin in the presence of ADP, and the heads have different affinities for ADP. This asymmetry suggests that phosphorylation alters the mechanical coupling between the heads of HMM. A model that incorporates strain between the two heads is proposed to explain the data, which have implications for how one head of a motor protein can gate the response of the other.     

Single-headed binding of a spin-labeled-HMM-ADP complex to F-actin. Saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance and sedimentation studies.

The interaction of actin and spin-labeled heavy meromyosin (MSL-HMM) was studied in the presence and absence of adenosine diphosphate or 5'-adenyl-yl-imidodiphosphate (AMPPNP) to determine the contributions of single and double-headed binding. The extent of single-headed binding to actin was deduced from a comparison of the fraction of immobilized heads (fi) with the fraction of bound molecules (fs) determined by saturation-transfer EPR (ST-EPR) and sedimentation, respectively. The ST-EPR measurements depend on the reduced motion of the spin label rigidly bound to the HMM heads upon the interaction of the latter with actin. During titration of acto-MSL-HMM with nucleotide, we measured changes in fi and fs brought about by dissociation of MSL-HMM from actin. On titration with ADP, fs changed very little, remaining above 0.8, while fi decreased to approximately 0.5 at 10mM ADP, a result consistent with extensive single-headed binding of MSL-HMM to actin. On titration with AMPPNP, single-headed binding was not detected; viz., fi and fs decreased in parallel. It was not necessary to postulate a nucleotide induced state of the bound heads, differing in motional properties from that of rigor heads, to account for the results.     

Mechanism of nucleotide binding to actomyosin VI: evidence for allosteric head-head communication

We have examined the kinetics of nucleotide binding to actomyosin VI by monitoring the fluorescence of pyrene-labeled actin filaments. ATP binds single-headed myosin VI following a two-step reaction mechanism with formation of a low affinity collision complex (1/K(1)' = 5.6 mm) followed by isomerization (k(+2)' = 176 s-1) to a state with weak actin affinity. The rates and affinity for ADP binding were measured by kinetic competition with ATP. This approach allows a broader range of ADP concentrations to be examined than with fluorescent nucleotide analogs, permitting the identification and characterization of transiently populated intermediates in the pathway. ADP binding to actomyosin VI, as with ATP binding, occurs via a two-step mechanism. The association rate constant for ADP binding is approximately five times greater than for ATP binding because of a higher affinity in the collision complex (1/K(5b)' = 2.2 mm) and faster isomerization rate constant (k(+5a)' = 366 s(-1)). By equilibrium titration, both heads of a myosin VI dimer bind actin strongly in rigor and with bound ADP. In the presence of ATP, conditions that favor processive stepping, myosin VI does not dwell with both heads strongly bound to actin, indicating that the second head inhibits strong binding of the lead head to actin. With both heads bound strongly, ATP binding is accelerated 2.5-fold, and ADP binding is accelerated >10-fold without affecting the rate of ADP release. We conclude that the heads of myosin VI communicate allosterically and accelerate nucleotide binding, but not dissociation, when both are bound strongly to actin.     

Difference between subfragment-1 and heavy meromyosin in their interaction with F-actin

To elucidate the difference between subfragment-1 and heavy meromyosin in their interaction with F-actin, we used limited tryptic digestion and cross-linking with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. The binding of actin to subfragment-1 lowers the susceptibility of the 50K-20K junction of its heavy chain to tryptic digestion. At a molar ratio of one actin to one subfragment-1, all the sites were gradually cleaved by trypsin whereas the sites were completely protected in the presence of a 2-fold molar excess of actin over subfragment-1. In the case of heavy meromyosin, nearly half of the sites were protected completely by the presence of an equimolar amount of actin to its heads suggesting that the two heads of heavy meromyosin bound actin in a different manner. The rate of the cross-linking reaction between subfragment-1 heavy chain and actin with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]carbodiimide also depended on the molar ratio of actin to subfragment-1. The rate was maximum at a molar ratio of about 5 actin to 1 subfragment-1. When heavy meromyosin was cross-linked to actin, the maximum rate was observed at a molar ratio of about 3 actin to 1 heavy meromyosin head, the level being about 60% that for subfragment-1 and actin. It was suggested that the presence of the subfragment-2 portion of heavy meromyosin caused these differences by restricting the motion of the two heads.     

Novel sensors of the regulatory switch on the regulatory light chain of smooth muscle Myosin

Smooth muscle myosin can be switched on by phosphorylation of Ser-19 of the regulatory light chain. Our previous photocross-linking results suggested that an element of the structural mechanism for the regulatory switch was a phosphorylation-induced motion of the regulatory light chain N terminus (Wahlstrom, J. L., Randall, M. A., Jr., Lawson, J. D., Lyons, D. E., Siems, W. F., Crouch, G. J., Barr, R., Facemyer, K. C., and Cremo, C. R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 5123-5131). Here we used three different approaches to test this notion, which are reactivity of cysteine thiols, pyrene and acrylodan spectral analysis, and pyrene fluorescence quenching. All methods detected significant differences between the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated regulatory light chain N termini in heavy meromyosin, a double-headed subfragment with an intact regulatory switch. These differences were not observed for subfragment-1, a single-headed, unregulated subfragment. In the presence of either ATP or ADP, phosphorylation increased the solvent exposure and decreased the polarity of the environment about position 23 of the regulatory light chain of heavy meromyosin. These phosphorylation-induced structural changes were not as evident in the absence of nucleotides. Nucleotide binding to unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin caused a decrease in exposure and an increase in polarity of the N terminus, whereas the effects of nucleotide on phosphorylated heavy meromyosin were the opposite. We showed a direct correlation between the kinetics of nucleotide binding/turnover and the conformational change reported by acrylodan at position 23 of the regulatory light chain. Acrylodan-A23C also reports the heads up (extended) to flexed (folded) transition in unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin. This is the first demonstration of direct coupling of nucleotide binding to conformational changes in the N terminus of the regulatory light chain.     

Further studies on the interaction of actin with heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1 in the presence of ATP.

It has been postulated that, during the hydrolysis of ATP, both normal and SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin undergo a rate-limiting transition from a refractory state which cannot bind to actin to a nonrefractory state which can bind to actin. This model leads to several predictions which were studied in the present work. First, the fraction of heavy meromysin or subfragment 1 which remains unbound to actin when the ATPase equals Vmax should have the same properties as the original protein. In the present study it was determined that the unbound protein has normal ATPase activity which suggests that it is unbound to actin for a kinetic reason rather than because it is a permanently altered form of the myosin. Second, if the heavy meromyosin heads act independently half as much subfragment 1 as heavy meromyosin should bind to actin. Experiments in the ultracentrifuge demonstrate that about half as much subfragment 1 as heavy meromyosin sediments with the actin at Vmax. Third, the ATP turnover rate per actin monomer at infinite heavy meromyosin concentration should be much higher than the ATP turnover rate per heavy meromyosin head at infinite actin concentration. This was found to be the case for SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin since, even at very high concentrations of SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin, in the presence of a fixed actin concentration, the actin-activated ATPase rate remained proportional to the SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin concentration. All of these results tend to confirm the refractory state model for both SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin and unmodified heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1. However, the nature of the small amount of heavy meromyosin which does bind to actin in the presence of ATP at high actin concentration remains unclear.     

Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin heads regulates the head-induced movement of tropomyosin

It has been shown that skeletal and smooth muscle myosin heads binding to actin results in the movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin, as revealed by a change in fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a fluorescence donor on tropomyosin and an acceptor on actin (Graceffa, P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11984-11992). In this work, tropomyosin movement was similarly monitored as a function of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated smooth muscle myosin double-headed fragment smHMM. In the absence of nucleotide and at low myosin head/actin ratios, only phosphorylated heads induced a change in energy transfer. In the presence of ADP, the effect of head phosphorylation was even more dramatic, in that at all levels of myosin head/actin, phosphorylation was necessary to affect energy transfer. It is proposed that the regulation of tropomyosin position on actin by phosphorylation of myosin heads plays a key role in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. In contrast, actin-bound caldesmon was not moved by myosin heads at low head/actin ratios, as uncovered by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and disulfide cross-linking between caldesmon and actin. At higher head concentration caldesmon was dissociated from actin, consistent with the multiple binding model for the binding of caldesmon and myosin heads to actin (Chen, Y., and Chalovich, J. M. (1992) Biophys. J. 63, 1063-1070).     

Kinetics of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin with one thiophosphorylated head

Actin-activated MgATPase of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin is activated by thiophosphorylation of two regulatory light chains, one on each head domain. To understand cooperativity between heads, we examined the kinetics of heavy meromyosin (HMM) with one thiophosphorylated head. Proteolytic gizzard heavy meromyosin regulatory light chains were partially exchanged with recombinant thiophosphorylated His-tagged light chains, and HMM with one thiophosphorylated head was isolated by nickel-affinity chromatography. In vitro motility was observed. By steady-state kinetic analysis, one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin had a similar K(m) value for actin but a V(max) value of approximately 50% of the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. However, single turnover analysis, which is not sensitive to small amounts of active heads, showed that one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin was 46-120 times more active than unphosphorylated HMM but only 7-19% as active as the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. Discrepancy between the single turnover and steady-state values could be explained by a small fraction of rigor heads. These rigor heads would have a large effect on the steady-state kinetics of one-head thiophosphorylated HMM. In summary, thiophosphorylation of one head leads to a molecule with unique intermediate kinetics suggesting that thiophosphorylation of one head cooperatively alters the kinetics of the partner head and vice versa.     

The binding of myosin heads on heavy meromyosin and assembled myosin to actin in the presence of nucleotides. Measurements by the proteolytic rates method

The initial rates of tryptic digestion at the 50/20-kDa junction in myosin and myosin subfragment 1 were determined for the free proteins and their complexes with actin in the presence and absence of MgATP. The proteolytic reactions were carried out at 24 degrees C and under ionic strength conditions (mu) adjusted to 35, 60, and 130 mM. The percentages of myosin heads and myosin subfragment 1 bound to actin in the presence of MgATP were calculated from the rates of proteolysis for each set of digestion experiments. In all cases, the myosin heads in the synthetic filaments showed greater binding to actin than myosin subfragment 1. This binding difference was most prominent (3-fold) at mu = 130 mM. The binding of heavy meromyosin (HMM) to actin in the presence of MgADP was measured at 4 degrees C by ultracentrifugation and the proteolytic rates methods. Ultracentrifugation experiments determined the fraction of HMM molecules bound to actin in the presence of MgADP, whereas the proteolytic measurements yielded the information on the fraction of HMM heads bound to actin. Taken together, these measurements show that a significant fraction of HMM is bound to actin with only one head in the presence of MgADP under ionic conditions of 180 and 280 mM.     

A spin-label study of phosphatidylcholine exchange protein. Regulation of the activity by phosphatidylserine and calcium ion.

The effects of the divalent cations Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+ on the Brownian rotational motion of fluorescently labeled myosin, heavy meromyosin and myosin subfragment-1 were measured by the method of time-resolved fluorescence depolarization. When Mg2+ was added to solutions of myosin or heavy meromyosin and EDTA, their rotational mobility increased. Ca2+ had no effect. Mn2+ increased the mobility of heavy meromyosin but decreased that of myosin. None of these divalent cations effected the mobility of subfragment-1. The binding of heavy meromyosin to actin was affected very little by Mg2+ or EDTA over a wide range of conditions. Divalent cations appear to change the swivel about which the heads of myosin rotate, presumably by binding to light chain 2 (also called DTNB light chain). However, the heads are still able to bind actin in nearly the same way whether Mg2+ is present or not. The concentration of free Mg2+ for the mid-point of the change in heavy meromyosin mobility is in good agreement with that for EDTA activation of ATPase activity. This suggests that EDTA activation is due to removal of Mg2+ bound to myosin itself.     

The tail domain of myosin Va modulates actin binding to one head

Calcium activates full-length myosin Va steady-state enzymatic activity and favors the transition from a compact, folded "off" state to an extended "on" state. However, little is known of how a head-tail interaction alters the individual actin and nucleotide binding rate and equilibrium constants of the ATPase cycle. We measured the effect of calcium on nucleotide and actin filament binding to full-length myosin Va purified from chick brains. Both heads of nucleotide-free myosin Va bind actin strongly, independent of calcium. In the absence of calcium, bound ADP weakens the affinity of one head for actin filaments at equilibrium and upon initial encounter. The addition of calcium allows both heads of myosin Va.ADP to bind actin strongly. Calcium accelerates ADP binding to actomyosin independent of the tail but minimally affects ATP binding. Although 18O exchange and product release measurements favor a mechanism in which actin-activated Pi release from myosin Va is very rapid, independent of calcium and the tail domain, both heads do not bind actin strongly during steady-state cycling, as assayed by pyrene actin fluorescence. In the absence of calcium, inclusion of ADP favors formation of a long lived myosin Va.ADP state that releases ADP slowly, even after mixing with actin. Our results suggest that calcium activates myosin Va by allowing both heads to interact with actin and exchange bound nucleotide and indicate that regulation of actin binding by the tail is a nucleotide-dependent process favored by linked conformational changes of the motor domain.     

The covalent modification of myosin's proteolytic fragments by a purine disulfide analog of adenosine triphosphate. Reaction at a binding site other than the active site.

A purine disulfide analog of ATP, 6,6'-dithiobis(inosinyl imidodiphosphate), forms mixed disulfide bonds between the 6 thiol group on the purine ring and certain key cysteines on myosin, heavy meromyosin, and subfragment one. The EDTA ATPase activities of myosin and heavy meromyosin were completely inactivated when 4 mol of thiopurine nucleotide was bound. When similarly inactivated, subfragment one, depending on its method of preparation, incorporated either 1 or 2 mol of thiopurine nucleotide. Modification of a single cysteine on subfragment one resulted in an inhibition of both the Ca2+ and the EDTA ATPase activities, but the latter always to a greater extent. Modification of two cysteines per head of heavy meromyosin had the same effect suggesting that the active sites were not blocked by the thiopurine nucleotides. Direct evidence for this suggestion was provided by equilibrium dialysis experiments. Heavy meromyosin and subfragment one bound 1.9 and 0.8 mol of [8-3H]adenylyl imidodiphosphate per mol of enzyme, respectively, with an average dissociation constant of 5 X 10(-7) M. Heavy meromyosin with four thiopurine nucleotides bound or subfragment one with two thiopurine nucleotides bound retained 65-80% of these tight adenylyl imidodiphosphate binding sites confirming the above suggestion. Thus previous work assuming reaction of thiopurine nucleotide analogs at the active site of myosin must be reevaluated. Ultracentrifugation studies showed that heavy meromyosin which had incorporated four thiopurine nucleotides did not bind to F-actin while subfragment one with one thiopurine nucleotide bound interacted only very weakly with F-actin. Thus reaction of 6,6'-dithiobis(inosinyl imidodiphosphate) at nucleotide binding sites other than the active sites reduces the rate of ATP hydrolysis and inhibits actin binding. It is suggested that these second sites may function as regulatory sites on myosin.     

Kinetics of ADP dissociation from the trail and lead heads of actomyosin V following the power stroke

Myosin V is a cellular motor protein, which transports cargos along actin filaments. It moves processively by 36-nm steps that require at least one of the two heads to be tightly bound to actin throughout the catalytic cycle. To elucidate the kinetic mechanism of processivity, we measured the rate of product release from the double-headed myosin V-HMM using a new ATP analogue, 3'-(7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carbonylamino)-3'-deoxy-ATP (deac-aminoATP), which undergoes a 20-fold increase in fluorescence emission intensity when bound to the active site of myosin V (Forgacs, E., Cartwright, S., Kovács, M., Sakamoto, T., Sellers, J. R., Corrie, J. E. T., Webb, M. R., and White, H. D. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 13035-13045). The kinetics of ADP and deac-aminoADP dissociation from actomyosin V-HMM, following the power stroke, were determined using double-mixing stopped-flow fluorescence. These used either deac-aminoATP as the substrate with ADP or ATP chase or alternatively ATP as the substrate with either a deac-aminoADP or deac-aminoATP chase. Both sets of experiments show that the observed rate of ADP or deac-aminoADP dissociation from the trail head of actomyosin V-HMM is the same as from actomyosin V-S1. The dissociation of ADP from the lead head is decreased by up to 250-fold.     

Effect of F-actin upon the binding of ADP to myosin and its fragments.

The effect of F-actin upon the binding of ADP to rabbit skeletal muscle myosin, heavy meromyosin, and subfragment 1 was studied by equilibrium dialysis, ultracentrifuge transport, and light scattering techniques. Both myosin and H-meromyosin (HMM) bind a maximum of approximately 1.6 mol of ADP/mol of protein, while S-1 binds approximately 0.9 mol of ADP/mol of protein. The affinity for ADP of all three preparations was similar at a given ionic strength (approximately 10(6) M-1 at 0.05 M KCl) and decreased with increasing ionic strength. Under conditions similar to those used for the measurement of ADP binding, the binding sites of myosin, HMM, and subfragment 1 (S-1) are saturated with actin at molar ratios of 2, 2, and 1 mol of actin monomer/mol of protein, respectively, as determined by light scattering, ultracentrifuge transport, and in the case of myosin by ATPase measurements. F-actin was found to inhibit ADP binding, but even at an actin concentration at least twice that required for saturation of myosin, HMM, or S-1, significant ADP binding remained. This ADP binding was inhibited by 10(-4) M pyrophosphate. The observations are consistent with the formation of an actomyosin-ADP complex in which actin and ADP are bound to myosin at distinct but interacting sites.     

Structural characterization of the binding of Myosin*ADP*Pi to actin in permeabilized rabbit psoas muscle

When myosin is attached to actin in a muscle cell, various structures in the filaments are formed. The two strongly bound states (A*M*ADP and A*M) and the weakly bound A*M*ATP states are reasonably well understood. The orientation of the strongly bound myosin heads is uniform ("stereospecific" attachment), and the attached heads exhibit little spatial fluctuation. In the prehydrolysis weakly bound A*M*ATP state, the orientations of the attached myosin heads assume a wide range of azimuthal and axial angles, indicating considerable flexibility in the myosin head. The structure of the other weakly bound state, A*M*ADP*P(i), however, is poorly understood. This state is thought to be the critical pre-power-stroke state, poised to make the transition to the strongly binding, force-generating states, and hence it is of particular interest for understanding the mechanism of contraction. However, because of the low affinity between myosin and actin in the A*M*ADP*P(i) state, the structure of this state has eluded determination both in isolated form and in muscle cells. With the knowledge recently gained in the structures of the weakly binding M*ATP, M*ADP*P(i) states and the weakly attached A*M*ATP state in muscle fibers, it is now feasible to delineate the in vivo structure of the attached state of A*M*ADP*P(i). The series of experiments presented in this article were carried out under relaxing conditions at 25 degrees C, where approximately 95% of the myosin heads in the skinned rabbit psoas muscle contain the hydrolysis products. The affinity for actin is enhanced by adding polyethylene glycol (PEG) or by lowering the ionic strength in the bathing solution. Solution kinetics and binding constants were determined in the presence and in the absence of PEG. When the binding between actin and myosin was increased, both the myosin layer lines and the actin layer lines increased in intensity, but the intensity profiles did not change. The configuration (mode) of attachment in the A*M*ADP*P(i) state is thus unique among the intermediate attached states of the cross-bridge ATP hydrolysis cycle. One of the simplest explanations is that both myosin filaments and actin filaments are stabilized (e.g., undergo reduced spatial fluctuations) by the attachment. The alignment of the myosin heads in the thick filaments and the alignment of the actin monomers in the thin filaments are improved as a result. The compact atomic structure of M*ADP*P(i) with strongly coupled domains may contribute to the unique attachment configuration: the "primed" myosin heads may function as "transient struts" when attached to the thin filaments.     

Phosphorylation-dependent regulation is absent in a nonmuscle heavy meromyosin construct with one complete head and one head lacking the motor domain

To understand the domain requirements of phosphorylation-dependent regulation, we prepared three recombinant constructs of nonmuscle heavy meromyosin IIB containing 1) two complete heads, 2) one complete head and one head lacking the motor domain, and 3) one complete head and one head lacking both motor and regulatory domains. Steady-state ATPase measurements showed that phosphorylation did not alter the affinity for actin by more than a factor of 2 for any construct. Phosphorylation increased V(max) by a factor of 10 for construct 1 and 1.5-3 for construct 2 but had no effect for construct 3. Single turnover measurements, a better measure of slow rates inherent to unphosphorylated regulated myosins, showed that the single-headed construct 2, like construct 3 retains less than 1% of the regulatory properties of the double-headed construct 1 (300-fold activation). Therefore, a complete head cannot be down-regulated by a regulatory domain (without the motor domain) on the partner head. Two motor domains are required for regulation. This result is predicted by a structural model (Wendt, T., Taylor, D., Messier, T., Trybus, K. M., and Taylor, K. A. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1385-1390) showing interaction between the motor domains for unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin, if motor-motor interaction is the basis for down-regulation.     

Does the S2 rod of myosin II uncoil upon two-headed binding to actin? A leucine-zippered HMM study

Myosin II, like many molecular motors, is a two-headed dimer held together by a coiled-coil rod. The stability of the (S2) rod has implications for head-head interactions, force generation, and possibly regulation. Whether S2 uncoils has been controversial. To test the stability of S2, we constructed a series of "zippered" dimeric smooth muscle myosin II compounds, containing a high-melting temperature 32-amino acid GCN4 leucine zipper in the S2 rod beginning 0, 1, 2, or 15 heptads from the head-rod junction. We then assessed the ability of these and wild-type myosin to bind strongly via two heads to an actin filament by measuring the fluorescence quenching of pyrene-labeled actin induced by myosin binding. Such two-headed binding is expected to exert a large strain that tends to uncoil S2, and hence provide a robust test of S2 stability. We find that wild-type and zippered heavy meromyosin (HMM) are able to bind by both heads to actin under both nucleotide-free and saturating ADP conditions. In addition, we compared the actin affinity and rates for the 0- and 15-zippered HMMs in the phosphorylated "on" state and found them to be very similar. These results strongly suggest that S2 uncoiling is not necessary for two-headed binding of myosin to actin, presumably due to a compliant point in the myosin head(s). We conclude that S2 likely remains intact during the catalytic cycle.     

Cooperative binding of tropomyosin to muscle and Acanthamoeba actin.

Analyses of the binding of tropomyosin to muscle and Acanthamoeba actin by the use of Scatchard plots indicate that the binding exhibits strong positive cooperativity in the presence of Mg2+. The cooperative nature of the binding is not affected by the presence of 80 mm KCl, but appears to decrease somewhat in the presence of heavy meromyosin or subfragment-1. Heavy meromyosin, subfragment-1, and KCl each increase the binding affinity of actin for tropomyosin; depending on the experimental condition and the type of actin involved, the apparent binding constant, Kapp, is in the range of 1 to 4 x 10(6) M-1. Muscle actin cross-linked with glutaraldehyde failed to bind tropomyosin even when heavy meromyosin, subfragment-1, or KCl were added as inducers, although the cross-linked actin still markedly activated the heavy meromyosin ATPase.     

Interaction of myosin subfragments with F-actin.

The effect of ionic strength, temperature, and divalent cations on the association of myosin with actin was determined in the ultracentrifuge using scanning absorption optics. The association constant (Ka) for the binding of heavy meromyosin (HmM) to F-actin was 1 X 10(7) M-1 at 20 degrees C, in 0.10 M KCl, 0.01 M imidazole (pH 7.0), 5 MM potassium phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.3 mM ethylene glycol bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N'-tetraacetic acid. Ka was the same for HMM prepared by trypsin or chymotrypsin. The affinity of subfragment 1 (S1) for actin under the same ionic conditions was 3 X 10(6) M-1. Varying the preparative procedure for S1 had little effect on Ka. The small difference in binding energy between HMM and S1 suggests that either only one head can bind strongly to actin at a time or that free energy is lost during the sterically unfavorable attachment of the two heads to actin.