Neural mechanisms for entrainment and generation of mammalian circadian rhythms.

The identification of a direct retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) terminating in the supra-chiasmatic nuclei (SCN) has focused attention on the role of these structures in the entrainment and generation of circadian rhythms in mammals. Light effects on circadian rhythms are mediated by both the RHT and portions of the classical visual system. The complex interactions of these systems are reflected both in their direct anatomical connections and in the functional changes in entrainment produced by interruption of either set of projections. Destruction of the RHT/SCN eliminated both normal entrainment and normal free-running circadian rhythms. No circadian rhythms has survived SCN ablation in rodents, but a variety of non-circadian cycles can be generated by lesioned animals. The complex behavioral patterns produced by SCN-lesioned hamsters suggest that circadian oscillators continue to function in these animals, but that their activity is no longer integrated into a single circadian framework. The available evidence indicates that the mammalian pacemaking system comprises a set of independent oscillators normally regulated by the SCN and by light information that is transmitted via several retinofugal pathways.     

How many pieces to build a circadian clock?

Biological rhythms represent a fundamental property of various living organisms. In particular, circadian rhythms, i.e. rhythms with a period close to 24 hours, help organisms to adapt to environmental daily rhythms. Although various factors can entrain or reset rhythms, they persist even in the absence of external timing cue, showing that their generation is endogenous. Indeed, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is considered to be the main circadian clock in mammals. Isolated SCN neurons have been shown to display circadian rhythms, and in each cell, a set of genes, called "clock genes", are devoted to the generation and regulation of rhythms. Recently, it has become obvious that the clock located in the SCN is not homogenous, but is rather composed of multiple functional components somewhat reminiscent of its neurochemical organization. The significance and implications of these findings are still poorly understood but pave the way for future exciting studies. Here, current knowledge concerning these distinct neuronal populations and the ways through which synchronization could be achieved, as well as the potential role of neuropeptides in both photic and non-photic resetting of the clock, are summarized. Finally, we discuss the role of the SCN within the circadian system, which also includes oscillators located in various tissues and cell types.     

The pineal gland influences rat circadian activity rhythms in constant light.

Mammalian circadian organization is believed to derive primarily from circadian oscillators within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). The SCN drives circadian rhythms of a wide array of functions (e.g., locomotion, body temperature, and several endocrine processes, including the circadian secretion of the pineal hormone melatonin). In contrast to the situation in several species of reptiles and birds, there is an extensive literature reporting little or no effect of pinealectomy on mammalian circadian rhythms. However, recent research has indicated that the SCN and circadian systems of several mammalian species are highly sensitive to exogenous melatonin, raising the possibility that endogenous pineal hormone may provide feedback in the control of overt circadian rhythms. To determine the role of the pineal gland in rat circadian rhythms, the effects of pinealectomy on locomotor rhythms in constant light (LL) and constant darkness (DD) were studied. The results indicated that the circadian rhythms of pinealectomized rats but not sham-operated controls dissociated into multiple ultradian components in LL and recoupled into circadian patterns only after 12-21 days in DD. The data suggest that pineal feedback may modulate sensitivity to light and/or provide coupling among multiple circadian oscillators within the SCN.     

Intrinsic regulation of spatiotemporal organization within the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The mammalian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a population of neural oscillators capable of sustaining cell-autonomous rhythms in gene expression and electrical firing. A critical question for understanding pacemaker function is how SCN oscillators are organized into a coherent tissue capable of coordinating circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology. Here we undertake a comprehensive analysis of oscillatory function across the SCN of the adult PER2::LUC mouse by developing a novel approach involving multi-position bioluminescence imaging and unbiased computational analyses. We demonstrate that there is phase heterogeneity across all three dimensions of the SCN that is intrinsically regulated and extrinsically modulated by light in a region-specific manner. By investigating the mechanistic bases of SCN phase heterogeneity, we show for the first time that phase differences are not systematically related to regional differences in period, waveform, amplitude, or brightness. Furthermore, phase differences are not related to regional differences in the expression of arginine vasopressin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, two key neuropeptides characterizing functionally distinct subdivisions of the SCN. The consistency of SCN spatiotemporal organization across individuals and across planes of section suggests that the precise phasing of oscillators is a robust feature of the pacemaker important for its function.     

Forced desynchronization of dual circadian oscillators within the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus

The circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (SCN) contains multiple autonomous single-cell circadian oscillators and their basic intracellular oscillatory mechanism is beginning to be identified. Less well understood is how individual SCN cells create an integrated tissue pacemaker that produces a coherent read-out to the rest of the organism. Intercellular coupling mechanisms must coordinate individual cellular periods to generate the averaged, genotype-specific circadian period of whole animals. To noninvasively dissociate this circadian oscillatory network in vivo, we (T.C. and A.D.-N.) have developed an experimental paradigm that exposes animals to exotic light-dark (LD) cycles with periods close to the limits of circadian entrainment. If individual oscillators with different periods are loosely coupled within the network, perhaps some of them would be synchronized to the external cycle while others remain unentrained. In fact, rats exposed to an artificially short 22 hr LD cycle express two stable circadian motor activity rhythms with different period lengths in individual animals. Our analysis of SCN gene expression under such conditions suggests that these two motor activity rhythms reflect the separate activities of two oscillators in the anatomically defined ventrolateral and dorsomedial SCN subdivisions. Our "forced desychronization" protocol has allowed the first stable separation of these two regional oscillators in vivo, correlating their activities to distinct behavioral outputs, and providing a powerful approach for understanding SCN tissue organization and signaling mechanisms in behaving animals.     

Resilience of circadian pacemaker development in hamsters

Disruptions of circadian rhythms have been linked to a wide range of pathologies from sleep disorders to cancer. The extent to which disruptions of circadian rhythms during development contribute to later conditions is not known. The present study tested the hypothesis that functional properties of the central circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), are affected by abnormal entrainment during development. The SCN is specialized for the generation of robust rhythms, for direct and indirect output to physiological and behavioral systems, and for entrainment to light/dark cycles via direct retinal input. It consists of thousands of neurons and glia with distinct phenotypes and has subdivisions delineated by both anatomical and functional criteria. In rodents, SCN rhythms develop within days after SCN cells are produced and before many other aspects of differentiation, such as synaptogenesis, are complete. We demonstrated that around the time of birth, the hamster SCN in vivo can undergo repeated phase shifts by a dopamine D(1) receptor agonist (SKF-38393). For 2 days before and 2 days after birth, one group of hamsters received regular exposure to the drug at the same time of day, while another group was exposed at varying times to induce repeated phase shifts. Free-running and entrained activity rhythms were compared between the groups at different ages after weaning. Repeated phase shifts during SCN development had a significant effect on free-running period measured immediately after weaning. This effect was eliminated by subsequent entrainment to a light/dark cycle, indicating that the effect was not permanent. These and other results suggest that SCN development required for functional properties such as free-running period is resilient to perturbation.     

Temporal reorganization of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in hamsters with split circadian rhythms.

A dual oscillator basis for mammalian circadian rhythms is suggested by the splitting of activity rhythms into two components in constant light and by the photoperiodic control of pineal melatonin secretion and phase-resetting effects of light. Because splitting and photoperiodism depend on incompatible environmental conditions, however, these literatures have remained distinct. The refinement of a procedure for splitting hamster rhythms in a 24-h light-dark:light-dark cycle has enabled the authors to assess the ability of each of two circadian oscillators to initiate melatonin secretion and to respond to light pulses with behavioral phase shifting and induction of Fos-immunoreactivity in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Hamsters exposed to a regimen of afternoon novel wheel running (NWR) split their circadian rhythms into two distinct components, dividing their activity between the latter half of the night and the afternoon dark period previously associated with NWR. Plasma melatonin concentrations were elevated during both activity bouts of split hamsters but were not elevated during the afternoon period in unsplit controls. Light pulses delivered during either the nighttime or afternoon activity bout caused that activity component to phase-delay on subsequent days and induced robust expression of Fos-immunoreactivity in the SCN. Light pulses during intervening periods of locomotor inactivity were ineffective. The authors propose that NWR splits the circadian pacemaker into two distinct oscillatory components separated by approximately 180 degrees, with each expressing a short subjective night.     

The brain's calendar: neural mechanisms of seasonal timing

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is the principal component of the mammalian biological clock, the neural timing system that generates and coordinates a broad spectrum of physiological, endocrine and behavioural circadian rhythms. The pacemaker of the SCN oscillates with a near 24 h period and is entrained to the diurnal light-dark cycle. Consistent with its role in circadian timing, investigations in rodents and non-human primates furthermore suggest that the SCN is the locus of the brain's endogenous calendar, enabling organisms to anticipate seasonal environmental changes. The present review focuses on the neuronal organization and dynamic properties of the biological clock and the means by which it is synchronized with the environmental lighting conditions. It is shown that the functional activity of the biological clock is entrained to the seasonal photic cycle and that photoperiod (day length) may act as an effective zeitgeber. Furthermore, new insights are presented, based on electrophysiological and molecular studies, that the mammalian circadian timing system consists of coupled oscillators and that the clock genes of these oscillators may also function as calendar genes. In summary, there are now strong indications that the neuronal changes and adaptations in mammals that occur in response to a seasonally changing environment are driven by an endogenous circadian clock located in the SCN, and that this neural calendar is reset by the seasonal fluctuations in photoperiod.     

Entrainment of circadian clocks in mammals by arousal and food

Circadian rhythms in mammals are regulated by a system of endogenous circadian oscillators (clock cells) in the brain and in most peripheral organs and tissues. One group of clock cells in the hypothalamic SCN (suprachiasmatic nuclei) functions as a pacemaker for co-ordinating the timing of oscillators elsewhere in the brain and body. This master clock can be reset and entrained by daily LD (light-dark) cycles and thereby also serves to interface internal with external time, ensuring an appropriate alignment of behavioural and physiological rhythms with the solar day. Two features of the mammalian circadian system provide flexibility in circadian programming to exploit temporal regularities of social stimuli or food availability. One feature is the sensitivity of the SCN pacemaker to behavioural arousal stimulated during the usual sleep period, which can reset its phase and modulate its response to LD stimuli. Neural pathways from the brainstem and thalamus mediate these effects by releasing neurochemicals that inhibit retinal inputs to the SCN clock or that alter clock-gene expression in SCN clock cells. A second feature is the sensitivity of circadian oscillators outside of the SCN to stimuli associated with food intake, which enables animals to uncouple rhythms of behaviour and physiology from LD cycles and align these with predictable daily mealtimes. The location of oscillators necessary for food-entrained behavioural rhythms is not yet certain. Persistence of these rhythms in mice with clock-gene mutations that disable the SCN pacemaker suggests diversity in the molecular basis of light- and food-entrainable clocks.     

Identification of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in birds

Circadian rhythms are generated by an internal biological clock. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus is known to be the dominant biological clock regulating circadian rhythms in mammals. In birds, two nuclei, the so-called medial SCN (mSCN) and the visual SCN (vSCN), have both been proposed to be the avian SCN. However, it remains an unsettled question which nuclei are homologous to the mammalian SCN. We have identified circadian clock genes in Japanese quail and demonstrated that these genes are expressed in known circadian oscillators, the pineal and the retina. Here, we report that these clock genes are expressed in the mSCN but not in the vSCN in Japanese quail, Java sparrow, chicken, and pigeon. In addition, mSCN lesions eliminated or disorganized circadian rhythms of locomotor activity under constant dim light, but did not eliminate entrainment under light-dark (LD) cycles in pigeon. However, the lesioned birds became completely arrhythmic even under LD after the pineal and the eye were removed. These results indicate that the mSCN is a circadian oscillator in birds.     

The mammalian circadian clock shop.

In mammals, a master circadian pacemaker driving daily rhythms in behavior and physiology resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN contains multiple circadian oscillators that synchronize to environmental cycles and to each other in vivo. Rhythm production, an intracellular event, depends on more than eight identified genes. The period of the rhythms within the SCN also depends upon intercellular communication. Many other tissues also retain the ability to generate near 24 -h periodicities although their place in the organization of circadian timing is still unclear. This paper focuses on the tissue-, cellular- and molecular-level events that generate and entrain circadian rhythms in behavior in mammals and emphasizes the apparent differences between the SCN and peripheral oscillators.     

In vivo monitoring of peripheral circadian clocks in the mouse

The mammalian circadian system is comprised of a central clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and a network of peripheral oscillators located in all of the major organ systems. The SCN is traditionally thought to be positioned at the top of the hierarchy, with SCN lesions resulting in an arrhythmic organism. However, recent work has demonstrated that the SCN and peripheral tissues generate independent circadian oscillations in Per1 clock gene expression in vitro. In the present study, we sought to clarify the role of the SCN in the intact system by recording rhythms in clock gene expression in vivo. A practical imaging protocol was developed that enables us to measure circadian rhythms easily, noninvasively, and longitudinally in individual mice. Circadian oscillations were detected in the kidney, liver, and submandibular gland studied in about half of the SCN-lesioned, behaviorally arrhythmic mice. However, their amplitude was decreased in these organs. Free-running periods of peripheral clocks were identical to those of activity rhythms recorded before the SCN lesion. Thus, we can report for the first time that many of the fundamental properties of circadian oscillations in peripheral clocks in vivo are maintained in the absence of SCN control.     

Photoperiod differentially regulates circadian oscillators in central and peripheral tissues of the Syrian hamster

In many seasonally breeding rodents, reproduction and metabolism are activated by long summer days (LD) and inhibited by short winter days (SD). After several months of SD, animals become refractory to this inhibitory photoperiod and spontaneously revert to LD-like physiology. The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) house the primary circadian oscillator in mammals. Seasonal changes in photic input to this structure control many annual physiological rhythms via SCN-regulated pineal melatonin secretion, which provides an internal endocrine signal representing photoperiod. We compared LD- and SD-housed animals and show that the waveform of SCN expression for three circadian clock genes (Per1, Per2, and Cry2) is modified by photoperiod. In SD-refractory (SD-R) animals, SCN and melatonin rhythms remain locked to SD, reflecting ambient photoperiod, despite LD-like physiology. In peripheral oscillators, Per1 and Dbp rhythms are also modified by photoperiod but, in contrast to the SCN, revert to LD-like, high-amplitude rhythms in SD-R animals. Our data suggest that circadian oscillators in peripheral organs participate in photoperiodic time measurement in seasonal mammals; however, circadian oscillators operate differently in the SCN. The clear dissociation between SCN and peripheral oscillators in refractory animals implicates intermediate factor(s), not directly driven by the SCN or melatonin, in entrainment of peripheral clocks.     

Simulation of day-length encoding in the SCN: from single-cell to tissue-level organization

The circadian pacemaker of the SCN is a heterogeneous structure containing many single-cell oscillators that display phase differences in gene expression and electrical activity rhythms. Thus far, it is unknown how single neurons contribute to the population signal measured from the SCN. The authors used single-unit electrical activity rhythms that have previously been recorded in SCN slices and investigated in simulation studies how changes in pattern shape and distribution of single neurons alter the ensemble activity rhythm of the SCN. The results were compared with recorded ensemble rhythms. The simulations show that single units should be distributed in phase to render the recorded multiunit waveform and that different distributions can account for the multiunit pattern of the SCN, including a bimodal distribution. Vice versa, the authors show that the single-unit distribution cannot be inferred from the ensemble pattern. Photoperiodic encoding by the SCN relies on changes in waveform of the neuronal output from the SCN and received special attention in this study's simulations. The authors show that a broadening or narrowing of the multiunit pattern can be based on changes in phase differences between neurons, as well as on changes in the circadian pattern of individual neurons. However, these mechanisms give rise to differences in the maximal discharge level of the multiunit pattern, leading to testable predictions to distinguish between the 2 mechanisms. If single units broaden their activity pattern in long days, the maximum frequency of the multiunit activity should increase, while an increase in phase difference between the single-unit activity rhythms should lead to a decrement in maximum frequency. The simulations also show that coding for day-length by an evening and morning oscillator is not self-evident and will only work under a limited set of conditions in which the distribution within each component and temporal distance between the components is taken into account. While the simulations were based on single-cell and multiunit electrical activity patterns, they are also relevant for understanding the relation between single-cell and population molecular expression profiles.     

Paraventricular-subparaventricular hypothalamic lesions selectively affect circadian function

The circadian timing system has three principal components: (i) entrainment pathways, (ii) pacemakers, and (iii) efferent pathways from the pacemakers that convey the circadian signal to effector systems. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is the principal mammalian circadian pacemaker and, although we understand the organization of entrainment pathways to the SCN and the pacemaker itself, we know much less about the functional organization of SCN projections mediating control of effector systems. It is unclear, for example, whether specific subsets of SCN projections control specific effector systems. In this study, we analyzed the effects of lesions ablating the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus (PVH), with variable extension into the subparaventricular zone (SPVZ) and adjacent structures, on nocturnal pineal melatonin production and rhythms in core body temperature (T_b) and rest-activity (R-A). In accordance with prior work, ablation of the PVH abolishes the nocturnal rise in pineal melatonin. Lesions restricted to the PVH do not affect rhythms in T_b and R-A but lesions extending caudally and ventrally into the SPVZ disrupt the R-A rhythm proportionate to the interruption of caudal SCN projections without affecting the rhythm in T_b. We conclude that pacemaker regulation of the circadian rhythms analyzed in this study is mediated by discrete sets of SCN projections: (i) dorsal projections to the PVH control pineal melatonin production; (ii) rostral projections to the anterior hypothalamic/preoptic areas mediate the T_b rhythm; and (iii) caudal projections to the SPVZ and hypothalamic arousal systems located in the posterior and lateral hypothalamic areas control the rhythm in R-A.     

Synchronization-induced rhythmicity of circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) host a robust, self-sustained circadian pacemaker that coordinates physiological rhythms with the daily changes in the environment. Neuronal clocks within the SCN form a heterogeneous network that must synchronize to maintain timekeeping activity. Coherent circadian output of the SCN tissue is established by intercellular signaling factors, such as vasointestinal polypeptide. It was recently shown that besides coordinating cells, the synchronization factors play a crucial role in the sustenance of intrinsic cellular rhythmicity. Disruption of intercellular signaling abolishes sustained rhythmicity in a majority of neurons and desynchronizes the remaining rhythmic neurons. Based on these observations, the authors propose a model for the synchronization of circadian oscillators that combines intracellular and intercellular dynamics at the single-cell level. The model is a heterogeneous network of circadian neuronal oscillators where individual oscillators are damped rather than self-sustained. The authors simulated different experimental conditions and found that: (1) in normal, constant conditions, coupled circadian oscillators quickly synchronize and produce a coherent output; (2) in large populations, such oscillators either synchronize or gradually lose rhythmicity, but do not run out of phase, demonstrating that rhythmicity and synchrony are codependent; (3) the number of oscillators and connectivity are important for these synchronization properties; (4) slow oscillators have a higher impact on the period in mixed populations; and (5) coupled circadian oscillators can be efficiently entrained by light–dark cycles. Based on these results, it is predicted that: (1) a majority of SCN neurons needs periodic synchronization signal to be rhythmic; (2) a small number of neurons or a low connectivity results in desynchrony; and (3) amplitudes and phases of neurons are negatively correlated. The authors conclude that to understand the orchestration of timekeeping in the SCN, intracellular circadian clocks cannot be isolated from their intercellular communication components.     

Melatonin's Role in Vertebrate Orcadian Rhythms

The circadian secretion of melatonin by the pineal gland and retinae is a direct output of circadian oscillators and of the circadian system in many species of vertebrates. This signal affects a broad array of physiological and behavioral processes, making a generalized hypothesis for melatonin function an elusive objective. Still, there are some common features of melatonin function. First, melatonin biosynthesis is always associated with photoreceptors and/or cells that are embryonically derived from photoreceptors. Second, melatonin frequently affects the perception of the photic environment and has as its site of action structures involved in vision. Finally, melatonin affects overt circadian function at least partially via regulation of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) or its hofnologues. The mechanisms by which melatonin affects circadian rhythms and other downstream processes are unknown, but they include interaction with a class of membrane-bound receptors that affect intracellular processes through guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding protein second messenger systems. Investigation of mechanisms by which melatonin affects its target tissues may unveil basic concepts of neuromodulation, visual system function, and the circadian clock.     

Cognitive Performance as a Zeitgeber: Cognitive Oscillators and Cholinergic Modulation of the SCN Entrain Circadian Rhythms

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the primary circadian pacemaker in mammals that can synchronize or entrain to environmental cues. Although light exerts powerful influences on SCN output, other non-photic stimuli can modulate the SCN as well. We recently demonstrated that daily performance of a cognitive task requiring sustained periods of attentional effort that relies upon basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic activity dramatically alters circadian rhythms in rats. In particular, normally nocturnal rats adopt a robust diurnal activity pattern that persists for several days in the absence of cognitive training. Although anatomical and pharmacological data from non-performing animals support a relationship between cholinergic signaling and circadian rhythms, little is known about how endogenous cholinergic signaling influences SCN function in behaving animals. Here we report that BF cholinergic projections to the SCN provide the principal signal allowing for the expression of cognitive entrainment in light-phase trained animals. We also reveal that oscillator(s) outside of the SCN drive cognitive entrainment as daily timed cognitive training robustly entrains SCN-lesioned arrhythmic animals. Ablation of the SCN, however, resulted in significant impairments in task acquisition, indicating that SCN-mediated timekeeping benefits new learning and cognitive performance. Taken together, we conclude that cognition entrains non-photic oscillators, and cholinergic signaling to the SCN serves as a temporal timestamp attenuating SCN photic-driven rhythms, thereby permitting cognitive demands to modulate behavior.