The GTPase Activity of FlhF Is Dispensable for Flagellar Localization,but Not Motility,in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses two surface organelles, flagella and pili, for motility and adhesion in biotic and abiotic environments. Polar flagellar placement and number are influenced by FlhF, which is a signal recognition particle (SRP)-type GTPase. The FlhF proteins of Bacillus subtilis and Campylobacter jejuni were recently shown to have GTPase activity. However, the phenotypes associated with flhF deletion and/or mutation differ between these organisms and P. aeruginosa, making it difficult to generalize a role for FlhF in pseudomonads. In this study, we confirmed that FlhF of P. aeruginosa binds and hydrolyzes GTP. We mutated FlhF residues that we predicted would alter nucleotide binding and hydrolysis and determined the effects of these mutations on FlhF enzymatic activity, protein dimerization, and bacterial motility. Both hydrolytically active and inactive FlhF point mutants restored polar flagellar assembly, as seen for wild-type FlhF. However, differential effects on flagellar function were observed in single-cell assays of swimming motility and flagellar rotation. These findings indicate that FlhF function is influenced by its nucleotide binding and hydrolytic activities and demonstrate that FlhF affects P. aeruginosa flagellar function as well as assembly.     

FlhF and Its GTPase Activity Are Required for Distinct Processes in Flagellar Gene Regulation and Biosynthesis in Campylobacter jejuni

FlhF proteins are putative GTPases that are often necessary for one or more steps in flagellar organelle development in polarly flagellated bacteria. In Campylobacter jejuni, FlhF is required for σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar gene expression and flagellar biosynthesis, but how FlhF influences these processes is unknown. Furthermore, the GTPase activity of any FlhF protein and the requirement of this speculated activity for steps in flagellar biosynthesis remain uncharacterized. We show here that C. jejuni FlhF hydrolyzes GTP, indicating that these proteins are GTPases. C. jejuni mutants producing FlhF proteins with reduced GTPase activity were not severely defective for σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar gene expression, unlike a mutant lacking FlhF. Instead, these mutants had a propensity to lack flagella or produce flagella in improper numbers or at nonpolar locations, indicating that GTP hydrolysis by FlhF is required for proper flagellar biosynthesis. Additional studies focused on elucidating a possible role for FlhF in σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar gene expression were conducted. These studies revealed that FlhF does not influence production of or signaling between the flagellar export apparatus and the FlgSR two-component regulatory system to activate σ⁵⁴. Instead, our data suggest that FlhF functions in an independent pathway that converges with or works downstream of the flagellar export apparatus-FlgSR pathway to influence σ⁵⁴-dependent gene expression. This study provides corroborative biochemical and genetic analyses suggesting that different activities of the C. jejuni FlhF GTPase are required for distinct steps in flagellar gene expression and biosynthesis. Our findings are likely applicable to many polarly flagellated bacteria that utilize FlhF in flagellar biosynthesis processes.Flagellar biosynthesis in bacteria is a complex process that requires expression of more than 50 genes in a sequential manner to ensure that the encoded proteins are secreted and interact in a proper order to construct a flagellar organelle (8). Formation of a flagellum to impart swimming motility is often an essential determinant for many bacteria to infect hosts or reside in an environmental niche. As such, flagella and flagellar motility are required for Campylobacter jejuni to initiate and maintain a harmless intestinal colonization in many wild and agriculturally important animals (16, 17, 19, 35, 47, 49), which leads to large reservoirs of the bacterium in the environment and the human food supply (13). In addition, flagellar motility is essential for the bacterium to infect human hosts to cause a diarrheal disease, which can range from a mild, watery enteritis to a severe, bloody diarrheal syndrome (4). Due to its prevalence in nature and in the food supply, C. jejuni is a leading cause of enteritis in humans throughout the world (7).C. jejuni belongs to a subset of motile bacteria that produce polarly localized flagella, which includes important pathogens of humans, such as Helicobacter, Vibrio, and Pseudomonas species. These bacteria have some commonalities in mechanisms for flagellar gene expression and biosynthesis, such as using both alternative σ factors, σ²⁸ and σ⁵⁴, for expression of distinct sets of flagellar genes (1, 6, 9, 11, 18, 20-22, 26, 36, 40, 44, 45, 49). In addition, these bacteria produce the putative FlhF GTPase, which is required in each bacterium for at least one of the following: expression of a subset of flagellar genes, biosynthesis of flagella, or the polar placement of the flagella. For instance, FlhF is required for expression of some σ⁵⁴- and σ²⁸-dependent flagellar genes and for production of flagella in the classical biotype of Vibrio cholerae (10). However, V. cholerae flhF mutants of another biotype can produce a flagellum in a minority of cells, but the flagellum is at a lateral site (14). Similar lateral flagella were found in flhF mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida (34, 37). FlhF of Vibrio alginolyticus may also be involved in the polar formation of flagella and may possibly influence the number of flagella produced (28, 29). Demonstration that FlhF is polarly localized in some of these species and the fact that FlhF has been observed to assist the early flagellar MS ring protein, FliF, in localizing to the old pole in one biotype of V. cholerae give credence that FlhF may be involved in the polar placement of flagella in the respective organisms (14, 29, 34).Bioinformatic analysis indicates that the FlhF proteins belong to the SIMIBI class of NTP-binding proteins (30). More specifically, the GTPase domains of FlhF proteins are most similar to those of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway GTPases, such as Ffh and FtsY. Because of the homology of the GTPase domains, these three proteins may form a unique subset within the SIMIBI proteins. Whereas the GTPase activities of the interacting Ffh and FtsY proteins have been extensively characterized (32, 38, 39, 42), little is known about the GTP hydrolysis activity of FlhF. Structural determination of FlhF of Bacillus subtilis indicates that the potential GTPase activity of FlhF is likely varied relative to those of Ffh and FtsY (2). However, no biochemical analysis has been performed to verify or characterize the ability of an FlhF protein to hydrolyze GTP. As such, no studies have correlated the biochemical activity of FlhF in relation to GTP hydrolysis with the role that FlhF performs in flagellar gene expression or biosynthesis.Through previous work, we have delineated the regulatory cascades governing flagellar gene expression in C. jejuni. We have found that formation of the flagellar export apparatus (FEA), a multiprotein inner membrane complex (consisting of the proteins FlhA, FlhB, FliF, FliO, FliP, FliQ, and FliR) that secretes most of the flagellar proteins out of the cytoplasm to form the flagellum, is required to activate the FlgS sensor kinase to begin a phosphorelay to the cognate FlgR response regulator (23, 24). Once activated by phosphorylation, FlgR likely interacts with σ⁵⁴ in RNA polymerase to initiate expression of many flagellar genes encoding components of the flagellar basal body, rod, and hook (20, 24). After formation of the hook, flaA, encoding the major flagellin, is expressed via σ²⁸ and RNA polymerase to generate the flagellar filament and complete flagellar biosynthesis (6, 18, 20, 21, 49). In two separate genetic analyses, we found that flhF mutants of C. jejuni are nonmotile and show a more than 10-fold reduction in expression of σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar genes, indicating that FlhF is required for both flagellar gene expression and biosynthesis (20). However, it is unclear how FlhF influences expression of σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar genes. Furthermore, it is unknown if the GTPase activity of FlhF is required for flagellar gene expression or biosynthesis in C. jejuni.We have performed experiments to determine that C. jejuni FlhF specifically hydrolyzes GTP, confirming that FlhF is a GTPase. Whereas the FlhF protein is required for motility, flagellar biosynthesis, and expression of σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar genes, the GTPase activity of the protein significantly influences only proper biosynthesis of flagella. These results suggest that multiple biochemical activities of FlhF (including GTPase activity and likely other, as yet uncharacterized activities mediated by other domains) are required at distinct steps in flagellar gene expression and biosynthesis. In addition, we provide biochemical and genetic evidence that FlhF likely functions in a pathway separate from the FEA-FlgSR pathway in C. jejuni to influence expression of σ⁵⁴-dependent flagellar genes. This study provides corroborative genetic and biochemical analysis of FlhF to indicate that FlhF has multiple inherent activities that function at different steps in development of the flagellar organelle, which may be applicable to many polarly flagellated bacteria.     

Membrane Protein Biogenesis in Ffh- or FtsY-Depleted Escherichia coli

Background

The Escherichia coli version of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) system is required for biogenesis of membrane proteins and contains two essential proteins: the SRP subunit Ffh and the SRP-receptor FtsY. Scattered in vivo studies have raised the possibility that expression of membrane proteins is inhibited in cells depleted of FtsY, whereas Ffh-depletion only affects their assembly. These differential results are surprising in light of the proposed model that FtsY and Ffh play a role in the same pathway of ribosome targeting to the membrane. Therefore, we decided to evaluate these unexpected results systematically.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We characterized the following aspects of membrane protein biogenesis under conditions of either FtsY- or Ffh-depletion: (i) Protein expression, stability and localization; (ii) mRNA levels; (iii) folding and activity. With FtsY, we show that it is specifically required for expression of membrane proteins. Since no changes in mRNA levels or membrane protein stability were detected in cells depleted of FtsY, we propose that its depletion may lead to specific inhibition of translation of membrane proteins. Surprisingly, although FtsY and Ffh function in the same pathway, depletion of Ffh did not affect membrane protein expression or localization.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that indeed, while FtsY-depletion affects earlier steps in the pathway (possibly translation), Ffh-depletion disrupts membrane protein biogenesis later during the targeting pathway by preventing their functional assembly in the membrane.     

Vestiges of the Bacterial Signal Recognition Particle-Based Protein Targeting in Mitochondria

The main bacterial pathway for inserting proteins into the plasma membrane relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP), composed of the Ffh protein and an associated RNA component, and the SRP-docking protein FtsY. Eukaryotes use an equivalent system of archaeal origin to deliver proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas a bacteria-derived SRP and FtsY function in the plastid. Here we report on the presence of homologs of the bacterial Ffh and FtsY proteins in various unrelated plastid-lacking unicellular eukaryotes, namely Heterolobosea, Alveida, Goniomonas, and Hemimastigophora. The monophyly of novel eukaryotic Ffh and FtsY groups, predicted mitochondrial localization experimentally confirmed for Naegleria gruberi, and a strong alphaproteobacterial affinity of the Ffh group, collectively suggest that they constitute parts of an ancestral mitochondrial signal peptide-based protein-targeting system inherited from the last eukaryotic common ancestor, but lost from the majority of extant eukaryotes. The ability of putative signal peptides, predicted in a subset of mitochondrial-encoded N. gruberi proteins, to target a reporter fluorescent protein into the endoplasmic reticulum of Trypanosoma brucei, likely through their interaction with the cytosolic SRP, provided further support for this notion. We also illustrate that known mitochondrial ribosome-interacting proteins implicated in membrane protein targeting in opisthokonts (Mba1, Mdm38, and Mrx15) are broadly conserved in eukaryotes and nonredundant with the mitochondrial SRP system. Finally, we identified a novel mitochondrial protein (MAP67) present in diverse eukaryotes and related to the signal peptide-binding domain of Ffh, which may well be a hitherto unrecognized component of the mitochondrial membrane protein-targeting machinery.     

Role of SRP RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and FtsY.

The bacterial homologues of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor, the Ffh*4.5S RNA ribonucleoprotein complex and the FtsY protein, respectively, form a unique complex in which both Ffh and FtsY act as GTPase activating proteins for one another, resulting in the mutual stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by both proteins. Previous work showed that 4.5S RNA enhances the GTPase activity in the presence of both Ffh and FtsY, but it was not clear how this was accomplished. In this work, kinetic and thermodynamic analyses of the GTPase reactions of Ffh and FtsY have provided insights into the role of 4.5S RNA in the GTPase cycles of Ffh and FtsY. We found that 4.5S RNA accelerates the association between Ffh and FtsY 400-fold in their GTP-bound form, analogous to its 200-fold catalytic effect on Ffh*FtsY association previously observed with the GppNHp-bound form [Peluso, P., et al. (2000) Science 288, 1640-1643]. Further, Ffh-FtsY association is rate-limiting for the observed GTPase reaction with subsaturating Ffh and FtsY, thereby accounting for the apparent stimulatory effect of 4.5S RNA on the GTPase activity observed previously. An additional step, GTP hydrolysis from the Ffh*FtsY complex, is also moderately facilitated by 4.5S RNA. These results suggest that 4.5S RNA modulates the conformation of the Ffh*FtsY complex and may, in turn, regulate its GTPase activity during the SRP functional cycle.     

flhF, a Bacillus subtilis flagellar gene that encodes a putative GTP-binding protein

We describe the sequence and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis flhF gene. flhF encodes a basic polypeptide of 41 kDa that contains a putative GTP-binding motif. The sequence of FlhF reveals a structural relationship to two Escherichia coli proteins, Ffh and FtsY, as well as to other members of the SRP54 family, in a domain presumed to bind GTP. flhF is located in a large operon consisting of chemotaxis and flagellar genes. Cells deficient in flhF are nonmotile. Through the use of anti-flagellar antibodies we have established that flhF is a flagellar (fla) gene. Thus, flhF is a unique flagellar gene in that it encodes a GTP-binding protein with similarities to members of the SRP54 family of proteins. These data suggest that flagellar biosynthesis in B. subtilis requires GTP.     

Analysis of the GTPase activity and active sites of the NG domains of FtsY and Ffh from Streptomyces coelicolor

Fifty-four homolog(Ffh)and FtsY are the central components of the signal recognitionparticle secretory pathway of bacteria.In this study,the core domain and active sites of FtsY and Ffh fromStreptomyces coelicolor,which are responsible for guanosine triphosphate(GTP)hydrolysis,were identi-fied using site-directed mutagenesis.Mutations were introduced to the conserved GXXGXGK loop of theputative GTP binding site.Mutation of the Lys residue to Gly in both FtsY and Ffh NG domains significantlydecreased the GTPase activity and GTP binding affinity.Furthermore,a structural model of the ternarycomplex of FtsY/Ffh NG domains and the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog guanylyl 5′-(β,γ-methylenediphosphonate)also revealed that each Lys residue in GXXGXGK of FtsY and Ffh provides thepredicted hydrogen bond required for GTP binding.However,in Fts Y not in Ffh,mutation of the first Glyresidue in the GXXGXGK loop disrupted the GTPase activity.In addition,protease-digesting test demon-strated that NG protein with the mutation of Lys residue was decomposed more easily.Western blot analysissuggested that in Streptomyces coelicolor,Fts Y is present in the membrane fraction and Ffh in the cytosolfraction during the mid-log phase of growth.These results indicated that Lys residue in the putative GTPbinding loop was the crucial residue for the GTPase activity of NG domain.     

The very early evolution of protein translocation across membranes

In this study, we used a computational approach to investigate the early evolutionary history of a system of proteins that, together, embed and translocate other proteins across cell membranes. Cell membranes comprise the basis for cellularity, which is an ancient, fundamental organizing principle shared by all organisms and a key innovation in the evolution of life on Earth. Two related requirements for cellularity are that organisms are able to both embed proteins into membranes and translocate proteins across membranes. One system that accomplishes these tasks is the signal recognition particle (SRP) system, in which the core protein components are the paralogs, FtsY and Ffh. Complementary to the SRP system is the Sec translocation channel, in which the primary channel-forming protein is SecY. We performed phylogenetic analyses that strongly supported prior inferences that FtsY, Ffh, and SecY were all present by the time of the last universal common ancestor of life, the LUCA, and that the ancestor of FtsY and Ffh existed before the LUCA. Further, we combined ancestral sequence reconstruction and protein structure and function prediction to show that the LUCA had an SRP system and Sec translocation channel that were similar to those of extant organisms. We also show that the ancestor of Ffh and FtsY that predated the LUCA was more similar to FtsY than Ffh but could still have comprised a rudimentary protein translocation system on its own. Duplication of the ancestor of FtsY and Ffh facilitated the specialization of FtsY as a membrane bound receptor and Ffh as a cytoplasmic protein that could bind nascent proteins with specific membrane-targeting signal sequences. Finally, we analyzed amino acid frequencies in our ancestral sequence reconstructions to infer that the ancestral Ffh/FtsY protein likely arose prior to or just after the completion of the canonical genetic code. Taken together, our results offer a window into the very early evolutionary history of cellularity.     

Conformation of the signal recognition particle in ribosomal targeting complexes

The bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to ribosomes synthesizing inner membrane proteins and, by interaction with the SRP receptor, FtsY, targets them to the translocon at the membrane. Here we probe the conformation of SRP and SRP protein, Ffh, at different stages of targeting by measuring fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorophores placed at various positions within SRP. Distances derived from FRET indicate that SRP binding to nontranslating ribosomes triggers a global conformational change of SRP that facilitates binding of the SRP receptor, FtsY. Binding of SRP to a signal-anchor sequence exposed on a ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) causes a further change of the SRP conformation, involving the flexible part of the Ffh(M) domain, which increases the affinity for FtsY of ribosome-bound SRP up to the affinity exhibited by the isolated NG domain of Ffh. This indicates that in the RNC–SRP complex the Ffh(NG) domain is fully exposed for binding FtsY to form the targeting complex. Binding of FtsY to the RNC–SRP complex results in a limited conformational change of SRP, which may initiate subsequent targeting steps.     

Identification and characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae Ffh, a homologue of SRP54 subunit of mammalian signal recognition particle

Recent studies have demonstrated that bacteria possess an essential protein translocation system similar to mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP). Here we have identified the Ffh, a homologue of the mammalian SRP54 subunit from S. pneumoniae. Ffh is a 58-kDa protein with three distinct domains: an N-terminal hydrophilic domain (N-domain), a G-domain containing GTP/GDP binding motifs, and a C-terminal methionine-rich domain (M-domain). The full-length Ffh and a truncated protein containing N and G domains (Ffh-NG) were overexpressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. The full-length Ffh has an intrinsic GTPase activity with k(cat) of 0.144 min(-1), and the K(m) for GTP is 10.9 microM. It is able to bind to 4.5S RNA specifically as demonstrated by gel retardation assay. The truncated Ffh-NG has approximately the same intrinsic GTPase activity to the full-length Ffh, but is unable to bind to 4.5S RNA, indicating that the NG domain is sufficient for supporting intrinsic GTP hydrolysis, and that the M domain is required for RNA binding. The interaction of S. pneumoniae Ffh with its receptor, FtsY, resulted in a 20-fold stimulation in GTP hydrolysis. The stimulation was further demonstrated to be independent of the 4.5S RNA. In addition, a similar GTPase stimulation is also observed between Ffh-NG and FtsY, suggesting that the NG domain is sufficient and the M domain is not required for GTPase stimulation between Ffh and FtsY.     

A cleavable N-terminal membrane anchor is involved in membrane binding of the Escherichia coli SRP receptor

Different from eukaryotes, the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor lacks a membrane-tethering SRP receptor (SR) β subunit and is composed of only the SRα homologue FtsY. FtsY is a modular protein composed of three domains. The N- and G-domains of FtsY are highly similar to the corresponding domains of Ffh/SRP54 and SRα and constitute the essential core of FtsY. In contrast, the weakly conserved N-terminal A-domain does not seem to be essential, and its exact function is unknown. Our data show that a 14-amino-acid-long positively charged region at the N-terminus of the A-domain is involved in stabilizing the FtsY-SecYEG interaction. Mutant analyses reveal that the positively charged residues are crucial for this function, and we propose that the 14-amino-acid region serves as a transient lipid anchor. In its absence, the activity of FtsY to support cotranslational integration is reduced to about 50%. Strikingly, in vivo, a truncated isoform of FtsY that lacks exactly these first 14 amino acids exists. Different from full-length FtsY, which primarily cofractionates with the membrane, the N-terminally truncated isoform is primarily present in the soluble fraction. Mutating the conserved glycine residue at position 14 prevents the formation of the truncated isoform and impairs the activity of FtsY in cotranslational targeting. These data suggest that membrane binding and function of FtsY are in part regulated by proteolytic cleavage of the conserved 14-amino-acid motif.     

Molecular crosstalk between the nucleotide specificity determinant of the SRP GTPase and the SRP receptor

In signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of proteins to the bacterial plasma membrane, two GTPases, Ffh (the SRP GTPase) and FtsY (the receptor GTPase), form a complex in which both proteins reciprocally stimulate each other's GTPase activities. We mutated Asp251 in the Ffh active site to Asn (D251N), converting Ffh to a xanthosine 5'-triphosphate (XTP)-specific protein as has been observed in many other GTPases. Unexpectedly, mutant SRP(D251N) is severely compromised in the formation of an active SRP.FtsY complex when bound with cognate XTP, and even more surprisingly, mutant SRP(D251N) works better when bound with noncognate GTP. These paradoxical results are explained by a model in which Ffh Asp251 forms a bidentate interaction with not only the bound GTP but also the receptor FtsY across the dimer interface. These interactions form part of the network that seals the lateral entrance to the composite active site at the dimer interface, thereby ensuring the electrostatic and/or structural integrity of the active site and contributing to the formation of an active SRP.FtsY complex.     

Domain rearrangement of SRP protein Ffh upon binding 4.5S RNA and the SRP receptor FtsY

The signal recognition particle (SRP) mediates membrane targeting of translating ribosomes displaying a signal-anchor sequence. In Escherichia coli, SRP consists of 4.5S RNA and a protein, Ffh, that recognizes the signal peptide emerging from the ribosome and the SRP receptor at the membrane, FtsY. In the present work, we studied the interactions between the NG and M domains in Ffh and their rearrangements upon complex formation with 4.5S RNA and/or FtsY. In free Ffh, the NG and M domains are facing one another in an orientation that allows cross-linking between positions 231 in the G domain and 377 in the M domain. There are binding interactions between the two domains, as the isolated domains form a strong complex. The interdomain contacts are disrupted upon binding of Ffh to 4.5S RNA, consuming a part of the total binding energy of 4.5S RNA-Ffh association that is roughly equivalent to the free energy of domain binding to each other. In the SRP particle, the NG domain binds to 4.5S RNA in a region adjacent to the binding site of the M domain. Ffh binding to FtsY also requires a reorientation of NG and M domains. These results suggest that in free Ffh, the binding sites for 4.5S RNA and FtsY are occluded by strong domain-domain interactions which must be disrupted for the formation of SRP or the Ffh-FtsY complex.     

Conformational change of the N-domain on formation of the complex between the GTPase domains of Thermus aquaticus Ffh and FtsY

The structural basis for the GTP-dependent co-translational targeting complex between the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor is unknown. The complex has been shown to have unusual kinetics of formation, and association in vivo is likely to be dependent on catalysis by the SRP RNA. We have determined conditions for RNA-independent association of the 'NG' GTPase domains of the prokaryotic homologs of the SRP components, Ffh and FtsY, from Thermus aquaticus. Consistent with previous studies of the Escherichia coli proteins, the kinetics of association and dissociation are slow. The T. aquaticus FtsY is sensitive to an endogenous proteolytic activity that cleaves at two sites--the first in a lengthy linker peptide that spans the interface between the N and G domains, and the second near the N-terminus of the N domain of FtsY. Remarkably, this second cleavage occurs only on formation of the Ffh/FtsY complex. The change in protease sensitivity of this region, which is relatively unstructured in the FtsY but not in the Ffh NG domain, implies that it undergoes conformational change on formation of the complex between the two proteins. The N domain, therefore, participates in the interactions that mediate the GTP-dependent formation of the targeting complex.     

Evidence for a novel GTPase priming step in the SRP protein targeting pathway.

Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway requires the interaction of two homologous GTPases that reciprocally regulate each other's GTPase activity, the SRP signal peptide- binding subunit (SRP54) and the SRP receptor alpha-subunit (SRalpha). The GTPase domain of both proteins abuts a unique 'N domain' that appears to facilitate external ligand binding. To examine the relationship between the unusual regulation and unique architecture of the SRP pathway GTPases, we mutated an invariant glycine in Escherichia coli SRP54 and SRalpha orthologs ('Ffh' and 'FtsY', respectively) that resides at the N-GTPase domain interface. A G257A mutation in Ffh produced a lethal phenotype. The mutation did not significantly affect Ffh function, but severely reduced interaction with FtsY. Likewise, mutation of FtsY Gly455 produced growth defects and inhibited interaction with Ffh. The data suggest that Ffh and FtsY interact only in a 'primed' conformation which requires interdomain communication. Based on these results, we propose that the distinctive features of the SRP pathway GTPases evolved to ensure that SRP and the SR engage external ligands before interacting with each other.     

X-ray structure of the T. aquaticus FtsY:GDP complex suggests functional roles for the C-terminal helix of the SRP GTPases

FtsY and Ffh are structurally similar prokaryotic Signal Recognition Particle GTPases that play an essential role in the Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)-mediated cotranslational targeting of proteins to the membrane. The two GTPases assemble in a GTP-dependent manner to form a heterodimeric SRP targeting complex. We report here the 2.1 A X-ray structure of FtsY from T. aquaticus bound to GDP. The structure of the monomeric protein reveals, unexpectedly, canonical binding interactions for GDP. A comparison of the structures of the monomeric and complexed FtsY NG GTPase domain suggests that it undergoes a conformational change similar to that of Ffh NG during the assembly of the symmetric heterodimeric complex. However, in contrast to Ffh, in which the C-terminal helix shifts independently of the other subdomains, the C-terminal helix and N domain of T. aquaticus FtsY together behave as a rigid body during assembly, suggesting distinct mechanisms by which the interactions of the NG domain "module" are regulated in the context of the two SRP GTPases.     

A Novel dnaJ Family Gene,sflA, Encodes an Inhibitor of Flagellation in Marine Vibrio Species

The marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus has a single polar flagellum. Formation of that flagellum is regulated positively and negatively by FlhF and by FlhG, respectively. The ΔflhF mutant makes no flagellum, whereas the ΔflhFG double-deletion mutant usually lacks a flagellum. However, the ΔflhFG mutant occasionally reverts to become motile by forming peritrichous flagella. We have isolated a suppressor pseudorevertant from the ΔflhFG strain (ΔflhFG-sup). The suppressor strain forms peritrichous flagella in the majority of cells. We identified candidate suppressor mutations by comparing the genome sequence of the parental strain, VIO5, with the genome sequences of the suppressor strains. Two mutations were mapped to a gene, named sflA (suppressor of ΔflhFG), at the VEA003730 locus of the Vibrio sp. strain EX25 genome. This gene is specific for Vibrio species and is predicted to encode a transmembrane protein with a DnaJ domain. When the wild-type gene was introduced into the suppressor strain, motility was impaired. Introducing a mutant version of the sflA gene into the ΔflhFG strain conferred the suppressor phenotype. Thus, we conclude that loss of the sflA gene is responsible for the suppressor phenotype and that the wild-type SflA protein plays a role in preventing polar-type flagella from forming on the lateral cell wall.     

Role for both DNA and RNA in GTP hydrolysis by the Neisseria gonorrhoeae signal recognition particle receptor

The prokaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP) targeting system is a complex of two proteins, FtsY and Ffh, and a 4.5S RNA that targets a subset of proteins to the cytoplasmic membrane cotranslationally. We previously showed that Neisseria gonorrhoeae PilA is the gonococcal FtsY homolog. In this work, we isolated the other two components of the gonococcal SRP, Ffh and 4.5S RNA, and characterized the interactions among the three SRP components by using gel retardation and nitrocellulose filter-binding assays and enzymatic analyses of the two proteins. In the current model of prokaryotic SRP function, based on studies of the Escherichia coli and mammalian systems, Ffh binds to 4.5S RNA and the Ffh-4.5S RNA complex binds to the signal sequence of nascent peptides and then docks with FtsY at the membrane. GTP is hydrolyzed by both proteins synergistically, and the nascent peptide is transferred to the translocon. We present evidence that the in vitro properties of the gonococcal SRP differ from those of previously described systems. GTP hydrolysis by PilA, but not that by Ffh, was stimulated by 4.5S RNA, suggesting a direct interaction between PilA and 4.5S RNA that has not been reported in other systems. This interaction was confirmed by gel retardation analyses in which PilA and Ffh, both alone and together, bound to 4.5S RNA. An additional novel finding was that P(pilE) DNA, previously shown by us to bind PilA in vitro, also stimulates PilA GTP hydrolysis. On the basis of these data, we hypothesize that DNA may play a role in targeting proteins via the SRP.