Sigma 54 levels and physiological control of the Pseudomonas putida Pu promoter

The cellular levels of the alternative sigma factor sigma(54) of Pseudomonas putida have been examined in a variety of growth stages and culture conditions with a single-chain Fv antibody tailored for detection of scarce proteins. The levels of sigma(54) were also monitored in P. putida strains with knockout mutations in ptsO or ptsN, known to be required for the C-source control of the sigma(54)-dependent Pu promoter of the TOL plasmid. Our results show that approximately 80 +/- 26 molecules of sigma(54) exist per cell. Unlike that in relatives of Pseudomonas (e.g., Caulobacter), where fluctuations of sigma(54) determine adaptation and differentiation when cells face starvation, sigma(54) in P. putida remains unexpectedly constant at different growth stages, in nitrogen starvation and C-source repression conditions, and in the ptsO and ptsN mutant strains analyzed. The number of sigma(54) molecules per cell in P. putida is barely above the predicted number of sigma(54)-dependent promoters. These figures impose a framework on the mechanism by which Pu (and other sigma(54)-dependent systems) may become amenable to physiological control.     

Active recruitment of sigma54-RNA polymerase to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida: role of IHF and alphaCTD.

The sequence elements determining the binding of the sigma54-containing RNA polymerase (sigma54-RNAP) to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida have been examined. Contrary to previous results in related systems, we show that the integration host factor (IHF) binding stimulates the recruitment of the enzyme to the -12/-24 sequence motifs. Such a recruitment, which is fully independent of the activator of the system, XylR, requires the interaction of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNAP with specific DNA sequences upstream of the IHF site which are reminiscent of the UP elements in sigma70 promoters. Our data show that this interaction is mainly brought about by the distinct geometry of the promoter region caused by IHF binding and the ensuing DNA bending. These results support the view that binding of sigma54-RNAP to a promoter is a step that can be subjected to regulation by factors (e.g. IHF) other than the sole intrinsic affinity of sigma54-RNAP for the -12/-24 site.