The distribution of fibronectin and tenascin along migratory pathways of the neural crest in the trunk of amphibian embryos

It is generally assumed that in amphibian embryos neural crest cells migrate dorsally, where they form the mesenchyme of the dorsal fin, laterally (between somites and epidermis), where they give rise to pigment cells, and ventromedially (between somites and neural tube), where they form the elements of the peripheral nervous system. While there is agreement about the crest migratory routes in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum), different opinions exist about the lateral pathway in Xenopus. We investigated neural crest cell migration in Xenopus (stages 23, 32, 35/36 and 41) using the X. laevis-X. borealis nuclear marker system and could not find evidence for cells migrating laterally. We have also used immunohistochemistry to study the distribution of the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoproteins fibronectin (FN) and tenascin (TN), which have been implicated in directing neural crest cells during their migrations in avian and mammalian embryos, in the neural crest migratory pathways of Xenopus and the axolotl. In premigratory stages of the crest, both in Xenopus (stage 22) and the axolotl (stage 25), FN was found subepidermally and in extracellular spaces around the neural tube, notochord and somites. The staining was particularly intense in the dorsal part of the embryo, but it was also present along the visceral and parietal layers of the lateral plate mesoderm. TN, in contrast, was found only in the anterior trunk mesoderm in Xenopus; in the axolotl, it was absent. During neural crest cell migration in Xenopus (stages 25-33) and the axolotl (stages 28-35), anti-FN stained the ECM throughout the embryo, whereas anti-TN staining was limited to dorsal regions. There it was particularly intense medially, i.e. in the dorsal fin, around the neural tube, notochord, dorsal aorta and at the medial surface of the somites (stage 35 in both species). During postmigratory stages in Xenopus (stage 40), anti-FN staining was less intense than anti-TN staining. In culture, axolotl neural crest cells spread differently on FN- and TN-coated substrata. On TN, the onset of cellular outgrowth was delayed for about 1 day, but after 3 days the extent of outgrowth was indistinguishable from cultures grown on FN. However, neural crest cells in 3-day-old cultures were much more flattened on FN than on TN. We conclude that both FN and TN are present in the ECM that lines the neural crest migratory pathways of amphibian embryos at the time when the neural crest cells are actively migrating. FN is present in the embryonic ECM before the onset of neural crest migration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The distribution of tenascin coincides with pathways of neural crest cell migration

The distribution of the extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein, tenascin, has been compared with that of fibronectin in neural crest migration pathways of Xenopus laevis, quail and rat embryos. In all species studied, the distribution of tenascin, examined by immunohistochemistry, was more closely correlated with pathways of migration than that of fibronectin, which is known to be important for neural crest migration. In Xenopus laevis embryos, anti-tenascin stained the dorsal fin matrix and ECM along the ventral route of migration, but not the ECM found laterally between the ectoderma and somites where neural crest cells do not migrate. In quail embryos, the appearance of tenascin in neural crest pathways was well correlated with the anterior-to-posterior wave of migration. The distribution of tenascin within somites was compared with that of the neural crest marker, HNK-1, in quail embryos. In the dorsal halves of quail somites which contained migrating neural crest cells, the predominant tenascin staining was in the anterior halves of the somites, codistributed with the migrating cells. In rat embryos, tenascin was detectable in the somites only in the anterior halves. Tenascin was not detectable in the matrix of cultured quail neural crest cells, but was in the matrix surrounding somite and notochord cells in vitro. Neural crest cells cultured on a substratum of tenascin did not spread and were rounded. We propose that tenascin is an important factor controlling neural crest morphogenesis, perhaps by modifying the interaction of neural crest cells with fibronectin.     

Distribution of integrins and their ligands in the trunk of Xenopus laevis during neural crest cell migration

We have examined the distribution in Xenopus embryos of beta 1 subunits of integrin, as recognized by cross-reactive antibodies against the avian integrin beta 1 subunit. These antibodies recognize a doublet of bands of approximately 120 kD in Xenopus embryos. The distribution pattern of these integrin cell surface receptors was compared with that of two possible ligands, fibronectin and laminin, in the extracellular matrix during the time of neural crest cell migration. Integrin immunoreactivity in the early neurula was observed lightly outlining somite and epidermal cells and the notochord. The integrin immunostaining increased with developmental age and was observed on most cell types in the embryo but was particularly notable in the intersomitic clefts through which motoraxons grow. The immunoreactivity in this region was not, however, wholly on the axon surfaces, since intersomitic integrin remained detectable in embryos in which the neural tube had been ablated. Fibronectin and laminin were more extensively distributed than integrin at all stages examined. Immunoreactivity for both was observed around the neural tube, notochord, somites, epidermis, dorsal mesentery, and lateral plate mesoderm. The distribution of laminin and fibronectin around the somites was particularly interesting since it was non-uniform and similar to that of integrin. Strongest staining was observed in the intersomitic clefts, and weakest staining was observed on the medial surface of the somites, which faces the neural tube and notochord. The major differences in distribution pattern between the fibronectin and laminin immunoreactivities were that only fibronectin was detected in the mesenchyme of the dorsal fin. Our results demonstrate that a molecule homologous to avian integrin is present in Xenopus embryos during neural crest cell migration and motoraxon outgrowth. Its presence in the intersomitic clefts and on the surface of many embryonic cell types together with the abundant distribution of its ligands are consistent with a potentially important developmental function in neurite outgrowth and/or muscle development.     

A Novel Role for Lh3 Dependent ECM Modifications during Neural Crest Cell Migration in Zebrafish

During vertebrate development, trunk neural crest cells delaminate along the entire length of the dorsal neural tube and initially migrate as a non-segmented sheet. As they enter the somites, neural crest cells rearrange into spatially restricted segmental streams. Extracellular matrix components are likely to play critical roles in this transition from a sheet-like to a stream-like mode of migration, yet the extracellular matrix components and their modifying enzymes critical for this transition are largely unknown. Here, we identified the glycosyltransferase Lh3, known to modify extracellular matrix components, and its presumptive substrate Collagen18A1, to provide extrinsic signals critical for neural crest cells to transition from a sheet-like migration behavior to migrating as a segmental stream. Using live cell imaging we show that in lh3 null mutants, neural crest cells fail to transition from a sheet to a stream, and that they consequently enter the somites as multiple streams, or stall shortly after entering the somites. Moreover, we demonstrate that transgenic expression of lh3 in a small subset of somitic cells adjacent to where neural crest cells switch from sheet to stream migration restores segmental neural crest cell migration. Finally, we show that knockdown of the presumptive Lh3 substrate Collagen18A1 recapitulates the neural crest cell migration defects observed in lh3 mutants, consistent with the notion that Lh3 exerts its effect on neural crest cell migration by regulating post-translational modifications of Collagen18A1. Together these data suggest that Lh3–Collagen18A1 dependent ECM modifications regulate the transition of trunk neural crest cells from a non-segmental sheet like migration mode to a segmental stream migration mode.     

Analysis of neural crest cell lineage and migration.

In this review, we describe the results of recent experiments designed to investigate various aspects of neural crest cell lineage and migration. We have analyzed the lineage of individual premigratory neural crest cells by injecting a fluorescent lineage tracer dye, lysinated fluorescein dextran, into cells within the dorsal neural tube. Individual clones contained cells that were located in very diverse sites consistent with their being sensory neurons, prepigment cells, Schwann cells, adrenergic cells, and neural tube cells. These results suggest that some neural crest cells in the trunk and cranial regions are multipotent prior to their emigration from the neural tube. The environment through which neural crest cells move influences both the pattern and direction of their migration. We have shown that the sclerotomal portion of the somites are responsible for the rostrocaudal pattern of trunk neural crest cell movement, whereas the neural tube appears to govern the dorsoventral position of neural crest-derived ganglia. In addition, the notochord inhibits the movement of neural crest cells. In order to understand necessary cell-matrix interactions in neural crest migration, we have performed perturbation experiments, in which antibodies directed against cell surface or extracellular matrix molecules were introduced along neural crest pathways. We find that integrins, fibronectin, laminin, and tenascin all play some role in cranial neural crest emigration. Thus, multiple factors may be involved in controlling neural crest cell migration, and different factors may be important for migration in different regions of the embryo.     

The developmental potentials of the caudalmost part of the neural crest are restricted to melanocytes and glia

The avian spinal cord is characterized by an absence of motor nerves and sensory nerves and ganglia at its caudalmost part. Since peripheral sensory neurons derive from neural crest cells, three basic mechanisms could account for this feature: (i) the caudalmost neural tube does not generate any neural crest cells; (ii) neural crest cells originating from the caudal part of the neural tube cannot give rise to dorsal root ganglia or (iii) the caudal environment is not permissive for the formation of dorsal root ganglia. To solve this problem, we have first studied the pattern of expression of ventral (HNF3beta) and dorsal (slug) marker genes in the caudal region of the neural tube; in a second approach, we have recorded the emergence of neural crest cells using the HNK1 monoclonal antibody; and finally, we have analyzed the developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the caudalmost part of the neural tube in avian embryo in in vitro culture and by means of heterotopic transplantations in vivo. We show here that neural crest cells arising from the neural tube located at the level of somites 47-53 can differentiate both in vitro and in vivo into melanocytes and Schwann cells but not into neurons. Furthermore, the neural tube located caudally to the last pair of somites (i.e. the 53rd pair) does not give rise to neural crest cells in any of the situations tested. The specific anatomical aspect of the avian spinal cord can thus be accounted for by limited developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the most caudal part of the neural tube.     

Formation of the dorsal root ganglia in the avian embryo: Segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells

The segmental origin and migratory pattern of neural crest cells at the trunk level of avian embryos was studied, with special emphasis on the formation of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) which organize in the anterior half of each somite. Neural crest cells were visualized using the quail-chick marker and HNK-1 immunofluorescence. The migratory process turned out to be closely correlated with somitic development: when the somites are epithelial in structure few labeled cells were found in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube, uniformly distributed along the craniocaudal axis. Following somitic dissociation into dermomyotome and sclerotome labeled cells follow defined migratory pathways restricted to each anterior somitic half. In contrast, opposite the posterior half of the somites, cells remain grouped in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube. The fate of crest cells originating at the level of the posterior somitic half was investigated by grafting into chick hosts short segments of quail neural primordium, which ended at mid-somitic or at intersomitic levels. It was found that neural crest cells arising opposite the posterior somitic half participate in the formation of the DRG and Schwann cells lining the dorsal and ventral root fibers of the same somitic level as well as of the subsequent one, whereas those cells originating from levels facing the anterior half of a somite participate in the formation of the corresponding DRG. Moreover, crest cells from both segmental halves segregate within each ganglion in a distinct topographical arrangement which reflects their segmental origin on the neural primordium. Labeled cells which relocate from posterior into anterior somitic regions migrate longitudinally along the neural tube. Longitudinal migration of neural crest cells was first observed when the somites are epithelial in structure and is completed after the disappearance of the last cells from the posterior somitic region at a stage corresponding to the organogenesis of the DRG.     

Abnormalities of cells and extracellular matrix of T/T embryos

Abstract. The dominant mutation T , (Brachyury), of the T/t -complex in the mouse causes severe disorganization in neural tube, notochord, and somites in homozygotes. The use of scanning electron microscopy to investigate the relationships of cells to one another and to the extracellular matrix in the three axial organs and in the head mesenchyme reveals that cells in all areas examined are abnormal in size, shape, and arrangement in T/T embryos. Cells of T/T head mesenchyme and somites are arrayed in flat sheets of broadened cells with fewer cytoplasmic processes than those of normal littermates. The notochord is discontinuous and its surface is exposed rather than covered by a dense matrix as in the normal. Likewise the sheath of the T/T neural tube is less dense than normal. Cell size and shape are very irregular whereas normal neural tube cells are all about the same size. Extracellular matrix in T/T embryos is greatly decreased in all areas.     

Experimental analysis of the migration and differentiation of neuroblasts of the autonomic nervous system and of neurectodermal mesenchymal derivatives, using a biological cell marking technique

By isotopic and isochronic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick, it has been previously shown that enteric ganglion cells arise from the “vagal” (somites 1–7) and the “lumbo-sacral” (behind somite 28) levels of the neural crest, while the trunk region (somites 8–28) gives rise to orthosympathetic ganglion chain and adrenomedullary cells. The latter originate precisely from the neural crest corresponding to somites 18–24 (i.e., “adrenomedullary” level of the crest). Heterotopic transplantations of fragments of quail neural tube into chick have been carried out in the present work. When the “adrenomedullary” level of the quail neural tube is grafted into the “vagal” region of a chick, the crest cells colonize the gut and differentiate into enteric ganglia of Auerbach's and Meissner's plexi. If quail cephalic neural crest is transplanted in the “adrenomedullary” level of a chick, quail cells migrate into the suprarenal glands and differentiate into adrenomedullary cells. Mesectodermal cells migrate laterally, and differentiate into cartilage, dermis and connective tissues. Thus it appears that preferential pathways located at precise levels of the embryo lead crest cells to their definitive sites. On the other hand the differentiation of the autonomic neuroblasts is controlled by the environment in which crest cells are localized at the end of their migration. On the contrary, mesenchymal derivatives of the cephalic neural crest appear to be early determined since they differentiate according to their presumptive fate when transplanted into the trunk.     

Site-restricted expression of cytotactin during development of the chicken embryo

The sequential appearance of the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, cytotactin, was examined during development of the chicken embryo by immunohistochemical techniques. Although cytotactin was identified as a molecule that mediates glia-neuron interactions, preliminary immunohistochemical localization of the molecule suggested that it was an ECM protein with a widespread but nonetheless more restricted distribution than either fibronectin or laminin. In the present study, it was found that cytotactin is first present in the gastrulating chicken embryo. It appears later in the basement membrane of the developing neural tube and notochord in a temporal sequence beginning in the cephalic regions and proceeding caudally. Between 2 and 3 d of development, the molecule is present at high levels in the early neural crest pathways (surrounding the neural tube and somites) but, in contrast to fibronectin and laminin, is not found in the lateral plate mesoderm or ectoderm. At later times, cytotactin is expressed extensively in the central nervous system, in lesser amounts in the peripheral nervous system, and in a number of nonneural sites, most prominently in all smooth muscles and in basement membranes of lung and kidney. Cytotactin appears in adult tissues with distributions that are similar to those seen in embryonic tissues. The findings raise the possibility that certain ECM proteins contribute to pattern formation in embryogenesis as a result of their restricted expression in a spatiotemporally regulated fashion at some sites but not at others.     

Mechanisms of neural crest cell migration

Neural crest cells are remarkable in their extensive and stereotypic patterns of migration. The pathways of neural crest migration have been documented by cell marking techniques, including interspecific neural tube grafts, immunocytochemistry and Dil-labelling. In the trunk, neural crest cells migrate dorsally under the skin or ventrally through the somites, where they move in a segmental fashion through the rostral half of each sclerotome. The segmental migration of neural crest cells appears to be prescribed by the somites, perhaps by an inhibitory cue from the caudal half. Within the rostral sclerotome, neural crest cells fill the available space except for a region around the notochord, suggesting the notochord may inhibit neural crest cells in its vicinity. In the cranial region, antibody perturbation experiments suggest that multiple cell-matrix interactions are required for proper in vivo migration of neural crest cells. Neural crest cells utilize integrin receptors to bind to a number of extracellular matrix molecules. Substrate selective inhibition of neural crest cell attachment in vitro by integrin antibodies and antisense oligonucleotides has demonstrated that they possess at least three integrins, one being an α₁β₁ integrin which functions in the absence of divalent cations. Thus, neural crest cells utilize complex sets of interactions which may differ at different axial levels.     

Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo

Neural crest cells migrate during embryogenesis to give rise to segmented structures of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system: namely, the dorsal root ganglia and the sympathetic chain. However, neural crest cell arise from the dorsal neural tube where they are apparently unsegmented. It is generally agreed that the somites impose segmentation on migrating crest cells, but there is a disagreement about two basic questions: exactly pathways do neural crest cells use to move through or around somites, and do neural crest cells actively migrate or are they passively dispersed by the movement of somite cells? The answers to both questions are critically important to any further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the precise distribution of the neural crest cells that develop into ganglia. We have done an exhaustive study of the locations of neural crest cells in chick embryos during early stages of their movement, using antibodies to neural crest cells (HNK-1), to neural filament-associated protein in growing nerve processes (E/C8), and to the extracellular matrix molecule laminin. Our results show that Some neural crest cells invade the extracellular space between adjacent somites, but the apparent majority move into the somites themselves along the border between the dermatome/myotome (DM) and the sclerotome. Neural crest cells remain closely associated with the anterior half of the DM of developing somites as they travel, suggesting that the basal lamina of the DM may be used as a migratory substratum. Supporting this idea is our observation that the development of the DM basal lamina coincides in time and location with the onset of crest migration through the somite. The leading front of neural crest cells advance through the somite while the length of the DM pathway remains constant, suggesting active locomotion, at least in this early phase of development. Neural crest cells leave the DM at a later stage of development to associate with the dorsal aorta, where sympathetic ganglia form, and to associate with newly emerging fibers of the ventral root nerve, where they presumably give rise to neuronal supportive cells. Thus we propose that the establishment of the segmental pattern of the peripheral ganglia and nerves depends on the timely development of appropriate substrata to guide and distribute migrating neural crest cells during the early stages of embryogenesis.     

Control of neural crest cell dispersion in the trunk of the avian embryo

Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the orientation and directional migration of neural crest cells. These include positive and negative chemotaxis, haptotaxis, galvanotaxis, and contact inhibition. To test directly the factors that may control the directional dispersion of the neural crest, I have employed a variety of grafting techniques in living embryos. In addition, time-lapse video microscopy has been used to study neural crest cells in tissue culture. Trunk neural crest cells normally disperse from their origin at the dorsal neural tube along two extracellular pathways. One pathway extends laterally between the ectoderm and somites. When either pigmented neural crest cells or neural crest cells isolated from 24-hr cultures are grafted into the space lateral to the somites, they migrate: (1) medially toward the neural tube in the space between the ectoderm and somites and (2) ventrally along intersomitic blood vessels. Once the grafted cells contact the posterior cardinal vein and dorsal aorta they migrate along both blood vessels for several somite lengths in the anterior-posterior axis. Neural crest cells grafted lateral to the somites do not immediately move laterally into the somatic mesoderm of the body wall or the limb. Dispersion of neural crest cells into the mesoderm occurs only after blood vessels and nerves have first invaded, which the grafted cells then follow. The other neural crest pathway extends ventrally alongside the neural tube in the intersomitic space. When neural crest cells were grafted to a ventral position, between the notochord and dorsal aorta, in this intersomitic pathway at the axial level of the last somite, the grafted cells migrate rapidly within 2 hr in two directions: (1) dorsally, in the intersomitic space, until the grafted cells contact the ventrally moving stream of the host neural crest and (2) laterally, along the dorsal aorta and endoderm. All of the above experiments indicate that neither a preestablished chemotactic nor adhesive (haptotactic) gradient exists in the embryo since the grafted neural crest cells will move in the reverse direction along these pathways toward the dorsal neural tube. For the same reason, these experiments also show that dispersal of the neural crest is not directed passively by other environmental controls, since the cells can clearly move counter to their usual pathway and against such putative passive mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Promotion of chromatophore differentiation in isolated premigratory neural crest cells by extracellular matrix material explanted on microcarriers

This study was undertaken to determine whether premigratory neural crest cells of the axolotl embryo differentiate autonomously into chromatophores, or whether stimuli from the environment, particularly from the extracellular matrix, are required for this process. Neural crest cells were excised from the dorsal part of the premigratory crest cord and cultured alone, either in a serum-free salt solution or in the presence of fetal calf serum (FCS), and together with explants of the neural tube or dorsal epidermis. A "microcarrier" technique was developed to assay the possible effects of subepidermal extracellular matrix (ECM) on chromatophore differentiation. ECM was adsorbed in vivo onto microcarriers prepared from Nuclepore filters, by inserting such carriers under the dorsolateral epidermis in the embryonic trunk. Neural crest cells were then cultured on the substrate of ECM deposited on the carriers. Melanophores were detected by DOPA incubation, revealing phenol oxidase activity, or by externally visible accumulation of melanin. Prospective xanthophores were visualized before they became overtly differentiated by alkali-induced pteridine fluorescence. Isolated premigratory neural crest cells did not transform autonomously into any of these phenotypes. Conversely, coculture with the neural tube or the dorsal epidermis, and also the initial presence or later addition of FCS during incubation, resulted in differentiation of neural crest cells into chromatophores. Both chromatophore phenotypes were also expressed on the ECM substrate deposited on the microcarriers. The results indicate that neural crest cells do not differentiate autonomously into melanophores and xanthophores, but that interactions with components of, or factors associated with the extra cellular matrix surrounding the premigratory neural crest and present along the dorsolateral migratory pathway are crucial for the expression of these chromatophore phenotypes in the embryo.     

The effect of back-transplants of the embryonic gut wall on growth of the neural tube

Experiments in which the developing gut of avian embryos was back-transplanted to permit the bowel to interact with the developing neural tube were undertaken. Segments of intestine from 4-day quail embryos were implanted between the somites and neural tubes of chick embryos of 7 to 24 somites. The spinal cord responded to the presence of the bowel by enlarging unilaterally on the side of the graft. This effect encompassed both gray and white matter and was accompanied by the extension of neuritic projections from the spinal cord into the enteric grafts. The growth-promoting effect of enteric transplants was manifest at all levels of the neural tube where the grafts were made and led to enlargement of the brain as well as the spinal cord; however, truncal neural crest derivatives in the region of the grafts, such as developing sympathetic and spinal ganglia, were unaffected. Neither sham operations nor grafts of ciliary ganglion, lung, pancreas, mesonephros, or rudiment of the eye mimicked the action of the gut. The effect of the bowel was manifest as early as 24 hr following back-transplantation and was found to be due to an increase in the number of cells in the neuroepithelium. The cell responsible for the ability of the gut wall to enhance neuroepithelial proliferation was not identified, but the effect lacked species specificity and could be elicited in the absence of endoderm or neural crest derivatives in the explant. We propose that the musculoconnective tissue of the gut produces a short-range diffusible factor that induces mitogenic activity in the neuroepithelial cells of the neural tube, but not in the crest cells that form sympathetic or sensory ganglia. Since the gut is not normally in apposition to the neural tube, we suggest that the physiological targets of this factor are the specialized crest cells that colonize the bowel and give rise to the enteric nervous system.     

The role of BMP signaling in outgrowth and patterning of the Xenopus tail bud.

Tail bud formation in Xenopus depends on interaction between a dorsal domain (dorsal roof) expressing lunatic fringe and Notch, and a ventral domain (posterior wall) expressing the Notch ligand Delta. Ectopic expression of an activated form of Notch, Notch ICD, by means of an animal cap graft into the posterior neural plate, results in the formation of an ectopic tail-like structure containing a neural tube and fin. However, somites are never formed in these tails. Here, we show that BMP signaling is activated in the posterior wall of the tail bud and is involved in the formation of tail somites from this region. Grafts into the posterior neural plate, in which BMP signaling is activated, will form tail-like outgrowths. Unlike the Notch ICD tails, the BMP tails contain well-organized somites as well as neural tube and fin, with the graft contributing to both somites and neural tube. Through a variety of epistasis-type experiments, we show that the most likely model involves a requirement for BMP signaling upstream of Notch activation, resulting in formation of the secondary neural tube, as well as a Notch-independent pathway leading to the formation of tail somites from the posterior wall.     

Regulation of Cell Number in Formation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion Revealed by Transplantation of Quail Neural Crest Cells into Chick Embryos

Neural crest cells appear transiently in early embryogenesis on the dorsal surface of the neural tube and subsequently migrate along specific pathways. Some migrate to between the neural tube and somites, aggregating to form the rudiments of dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The size of DRG at a given somite level is almost constant in all chick embryos. To determine the mechanisms controlling the size of DRG, we transplanted neural crest cells of 2.5-day-old quail embryos into 2.5-day-old chick embryos between the neural tube and the somites, and examined the size of DRG in these chimeric embryos with extra neural crest cells 2 days after the operation, when natural cell death in DRG had not yet occurred. The DRG on the operated side were composed of both chick and quail cells in various proportions. The cell numbers of these chimeric DRG were almost the same as those of the normal DRG on the opposite side. That is, there were significantly fewer chick cells in chimeric DRG than in DRG composed of only chick cells on the opposite unoperated side. This finding indicates that the size of DRG is not determined in migrating neural crest cells but is regulated by the circumstances.