Random mutagenesis of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in yeast: identification of second-site mutations that restore function to a coupling-deficient mutant M3 receptor

The M(3) muscarinic receptor is a prototypical member of the class A family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To gain insight into the structural mechanisms governing agonist-mediated M(3) receptor activation, we recently developed a genetically modified yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) which allows the efficient screening of large libraries of mutant M(3) receptors to identify mutant receptors with altered/novel functional properties. Class A GPCRs contain a highly conserved Asp residue located in transmembrane domain II (TM II; corresponding to Asp-113 in the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor) which is of fundamental importance for receptor activation. As observed previously with other GPCRs analyzed in mammalian expression systems, the D113N point mutation abolished agonist-induced receptor/G protein coupling in yeast. We then subjected the D113N mutant M(3) receptor to PCR-based random mutagenesis followed by a yeast genetic screen to recover point mutations that can restore G protein coupling to the D113N mutant receptor. A large scale screening effort led to the identification of three such second-site suppressor mutations, R165W, R165M, and Y250D. When expressed in the wild-type receptor background, these three point mutations did not lead to an increase in basal activity and reduced the efficiency of receptor/G protein coupling. Similar results were obtained when the various mutant receptors were expressed and analyzed in transfected mammalian cells (COS-7 cells). Interestingly, like Asp-113, Arg-165 and Tyr-250, which are located at the cytoplasmic ends of TM III and TM V, respectively, are also highly conserved among class A GPCRs. Our data suggest a conformational link between the highly conserved Asp-113, Arg-165, and Tyr-250 residues which is critical for receptor activation.     

Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors

An approach to discover sequence patterns characteristic of ligand classes is described and applied to aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Putative ligand-binding residue positions were inferred from considering three lines of evidence: conservation in the subfamily absent or underrepresented in the superfamily, any available mutation data, and the physicochemical properties of the ligand. For aminergic GPCRs, the motif is composed of a conserved aspartic acid in the third transmembrane (TM) domain (rhodopsin position 117) and a conserved tryptophan in the seventh TM domain (rhodopsin position 293); the roles of each are readily justified by molecular modeling of ligand-receptor interactions. This minimally defined motif is an appropriate computational tool for identifying additional, potentially novel aminergic GPCRs from a set of experimentally uncharacterized "orphan" GPCRs, complementing existing sequence matching, clustering, and machine-learning techniques. Motif sensitivity stems from the stepwise addition of residues characteristic of an entire class of ligand (and not tailored for any particular biogenic amine). This sensitivity is balanced by careful consideration of residues (evidence drawn from mutation data, correlation of ligand properties to residue properties, and location with respect to the extracellular face), thereby maintaining specificity for the aminergic class. A number of orphan GPCRs assigned to the aminergic class by this motif were later discovered to be a novel subfamily of trace amine GPCRs, as well as the successful classification of the histamine H4 receptor.     

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation.

We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC₁ receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y²²⁴, N²²⁹, F²³⁰, W²³², E²³⁶, G²³⁷, Y²³⁹, L²⁴⁰. N²²⁹A VPAC₁ mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N²²⁹D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N²²⁹Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N²²⁹A and N²²⁹Q VPAC₁ were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking.

Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC₂ could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N²¹⁶Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.     

Constitutive activation of G protein-coupled receptors as a result of selective substitution of a conserved leucine residue in transmembrane helix III

Whereas numerous mutations of the human lutropin receptor (hLHR) and human TSH receptor (hTSHR) have been shown to cause constitutive activation of these receptors, it has been suggested that either the hFSHR as a whole, or the i3/TM VI region of the hFSHR, is less susceptible to mutation-induced constitutive activation. However, as shown herein, substitution of a highly conserved leucine residue in transmembrane III (TM III) of the hFSHR (Leu 111.18) with arginine causes a 5-fold increase in basal cAMP in transfected cells, consistent with a strong constitutive activation of the hFSHR. Interestingly, this mutant is unresponsive to further hormonal stimulation. Substitutions of hFSHR(L460) with lysine, alanine, or aspartate show that only arginine causes constitutive activation. However, all result in decreased FSH responsiveness, suggesting a role for L460 in FSH-stimulated cAMP production by the hFSHR. Because Leu 111.18 is highly conserved in rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), we tested the effects of substitution of the comparable leucine in the human beta2-adrenergic receptor (hbeta2-AR). Substitution of L124 in the hbeta2-AR with arginine, lysine, or alanine resulted in constitutive activation as evidenced by increased basal levels of cAMP that could be attenuated by an inverse agonist. In all cases, isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP was unaffected. Taken altogether, our data support a model whereby Leu 111.18 may play a general role in GPCRs by stabilizing them in an inactive state. Constitutive activation may arise by both a disruption of Leu 111.18 as well as the introduction of a specific residue that serves to stabilize the active state of the receptor.     

Random mutagenesis of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in yeast. Identification of point mutations that "silence" a constitutively active mutant M3 receptor and greatly impair receptor/G protein coupling

The M3 muscarinic receptor is a prototypical member of the class I family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To facilitate studies on the structural mechanisms governing M3 receptor activation, we generated an M3 receptor-expressing yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) that requires agonist-dependent M3 receptor activation for cell growth. By using receptor random mutagenesis followed by a genetic screen in yeast, we initially identified a point mutation at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain (TM) VI (Q490L) that led to robust agonist-independent M3 receptor signaling in both yeast and mammalian cells. To explore further the molecular mechanisms by which point mutations can render GPCRs constitutively active, we subjected a region of the Q490L mutant M3 receptor that included TM V-VII to random mutagenesis. We then applied a yeast genetic screen to identify second-site mutations that could suppress the activating effects of the Q490L mutation and restore wild-type receptor-like function to the Q490L mutant receptor. This analysis led to the identification of 12 point mutations that allowed the Q490L mutant receptor to function in a fashion similar to the wild-type receptor. These amino acid substitutions mapped to two distinct regions of the M3 receptor, the exofacial segments of TM V and VI and the cytoplasmic ends of TM V-VII. Strikingly, in the absence of the activating Q490L mutation, all recovered point mutations severely reduced the efficiency of receptor/G protein coupling, indicating that the targeted residues play important roles in receptor activation and/or receptor/G protein coupling. This strategy should be generally applicable to identify sites in GPCRs that are critically involved in receptor function.     

Molecular dynamics simulations reveal insights into key structural elements of adenosine receptors

The crystal structure of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, is used as a starting point for the structural characterization of the conformational equilibrium around the inactive conformation of the human A(2) (A(2A) and A(2B)) adenosine receptors (ARs). A homology model of the closely related A(2B)AR is reported, and the two receptors were simulated in their apo form through all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Different conditions were additionally explored in the A(2A)AR, including the protonation state of crucial histidines or the presence of the cocrystallized ligand. Our simulations reveal the role of several conserved residues in the ARs in the conformational equilibrium of the receptors. The "ionic lock" absent in the crystal structure of the inactive A(2A)AR is rapidly formed in the two simulated receptors, and a complex network of interacting residues is presented that further stabilizes this structural element. Notably, the observed rotameric transition of Trp6.48 ("toggle switch"), which is thought to initiate the activation process in GPCRs, is accompanied by a concerted rotation of the conserved residue of the A(2)ARs, His6.52. This new conformation is further stabilized in the two receptors under study by a novel interaction network involving residues in transmembrane (TM) helices TM5 (Asn5.42) and TM3 (Gln3.37), which resemble the conformational changes recently observed in the agonist-bound structure of β-adrenoreceptors. Finally, the interaction between Glu1.39 and His7.43, a pair of conserved residues in the family of ARs, is found to be weaker than previously thought, and the role of this interaction in the structure and dynamics of the receptor is thoroughly examined. All these findings suggest that, despite the commonalities with other GPCRs, the conformational equilibrium of ARs is also modulated by specific residues of the family.     

Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation

All G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) share a common seven TM helix architecture and the ability to activate heterotrimeric G proteins. Nevertheless, these receptors have widely divergent sequences with no significant homology. We present a detailed structure-function comparison of the very divergent Class A and D receptors to address whether there is a common activation mechanism across the GPCR superfamily. The Class A and D receptors are represented by the vertebrate visual pigment rhodopsin and the yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor Ste2, respectively. Conserved amino acids within each specific receptor class and amino acids where mutation alters receptor function were located in the structures of rhodopsin and Ste2 to assess whether there are functionally equivalent positions or regions within these receptors. We find several general similarities that are quite striking. First, strongly polar amino acids mediate helix interactions. Their mutation generally leads to loss of function or constitutive activity. Second, small and weakly polar amino acids facilitate tight helix packing. Third, proline is essential at similar positions in transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of both receptors. Mapping the specific location of the conserved amino acids and sites of constitutively active mutations identified conserved microdomains on transmembrane helices H3, H6, and H7, suggesting that there are underlying similarities in the mechanism of the widely divergent Class A and Class D receptors.     

The activation mechanism of chemokine receptor CCR5 involves common structural changes but a different network of interhelical interactions relative to rhodopsin

In G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the interaction between the cytosolic ends of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) and TM6 was shown to play an important role in the transition from inactive to active states. According to the currently prevailing model, constructed for rhodopsin and structurally related receptors, the arginine of the conserved "DRY" motif located at the cytosolic end of TM3 (R3.50) would interact with acidic residues in TM3 (D/E3.49) and TM6 (D/E6.30) at the resting state and shift out of this polar pocket upon agonist stimulation. However, 30% of GPCRs, including all chemokine receptors, contain a positively charged residue at position 6.30 which does not support an interaction with R3.50. We have investigated the role of R6.30 in this receptor family by using CCR5 as a model. R6.30D and R6.30E substitutions, which allow an ionic interaction with R3.50, resulted in an almost silent receptor devoid of constitutive activity and strongly impaired in its ability to bind chemokines but still able to internalize. R6.30A and R6.30Q substitutions, allowing weaker interactions with R3.50, preserved chemokine binding but reduced the constitutive activity and the functional response to chemokines. These results indicate that the constitutive and ligand-promoted activity of CCR5 can be modified by modulating the interaction between the DRY motif in TM3 and residues in TM6 suggesting that the overall structure and activation mechanism are well conserved in GPCRs. However, the molecular interactions locking the inactive state must be different in receptors devoid of D/E6.30.     

Highly conserved intracellular H208 residue influences agonist selectivity in bitter taste receptor T2R14

Bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are a specialized class of cell membrane receptors of the G protein-coupled receptor family and perform a crucial role in chemosensation. The 25 T2Rs in humans are activated by structurally diverse ligands of plant, animal and microbial origin. The mechanisms of activation of these receptors are poorly understood. Therefore, identification of structural determinants of T2Rs that regulate its efficacy could be beneficial in understanding the molecular mechanisms of T2R activation. In this work, we characterized a highly conserved histidine (H208), present at TM5-ICL3 region of T2R14 and its role in agonist-induced T2R14 signaling. Surprisingly, mutation of the conserved H208 (H208A) did not result in increased basal activity of T2R14, in contrast to similar H206A mutation in T2R4 that showed constitutive or basal activity. However, H208A mutation in T2R14 resulted in an increase in agonist-induced efficacy for Flufenamic acid (FFA). Interestingly, H208A did not affect the potency of another T2R14 agonist Diphenhydramine (DPH). The H208R compensatory mutation showed FFA response similar to wild-type T2R14. Molecular modeling suggests a FFA-induced shift in TM3 and TM5 helices of H208A, which changes the network of interactions connecting TM5-ICL3-TM6. This report identifies a crucial residue on the intracellular surface of T2Rs that is involved in bitter ligand selectivity. It also highlights the varied roles carried out by some conserved residues in different T2Rs.     

Structure and pH sensitivity of the transmembrane segment 3 of rhodopsin

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) originates in ligand-induced protein conformational changes that are transmitted to the cytosolic receptor surface. In the photoreceptor rhodopsin, and possibly other rhodopsin-like GPCRs, protonation of a carboxylic acid in the conserved E(D)RY motif at the cytosolic end of transmembrane helix 3 (TM3) is coupled to receptor activation. Here, we have investigated the structure of synthetic peptides derived from rhodopsin TM3. Polarized FTIR spectroscopy reveals a helical structure of a 31-mer TM3 peptide reconstituted into PC vesicles with a large tilt of 40-50 degrees of the helical axis relative to the membrane normal. Helical structure is also observed for the TM3 peptide in detergent micelles and depends on pH, especially in the C-terminal sequence. In addition, the fluorescence emission of the single tyrosine of the D(E)RY motif in the TM3 peptide exhibits a pronounced pH sensitivity that is abolished when Glu is replaced by Gln, demonstrating that protonation of the conserved Glu side chain affects the structure in the environment of the D(E)RY motif of TM3. The pH regulation of the C-terminal TM3 structure may be an intrinsic feature of the E(D)RY motif in other class I receptors, allowing the coupling of protonation and conformation of membrane-exposed residues in full-length GPCRs.     

G protein-coupled receptors of class A harness the energy of membrane potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity

The human genome contains about 700 genes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) of class A; these seven-helical membrane proteins are the targets of almost half of all known drugs. In the middle of the helix bundle, crystal structures reveal a highly conserved sodium-binding site, which is connected with the extracellular side by a water-filled tunnel. This binding site contains a sodium ion in those GPCRs that are crystallized in their inactive conformations but does not in those GPCRs that are trapped in agonist-bound active conformations. The escape route of the sodium ion upon the inactive-to-active transition and its very direction have until now remained obscure. Here, by modeling the available experimental data, we show that the sodium gradient over the cell membrane increases the sensitivity of GPCRs if their activation is thermodynamically coupled to the sodium ion translocation into the cytoplasm but decreases it if the sodium ion retreats into the extracellular space upon receptor activation. The model quantitatively describes the available data on both activation and suppression of distinct GPCRs by membrane voltage. The model also predicts selective amplification of the signal from (endogenous) agonists if only they, but not their (partial) analogs, induce sodium translocation. Comparative structure and sequence analyses of sodium-binding GPCRs indicate a key role for the conserved leucine residue in the second transmembrane helix (Leu2.46) in coupling sodium translocation to receptor activation. Hence, class A GPCRs appear to harness the energy of the transmembrane sodium potential to increase their sensitivity and selectivity.     

A single subunit (GB2) is required for G-protein activation by the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.

Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABA(B)R) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152-2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca(2+) channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABA(B) heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.     

Constitutive activation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the orientation of transmembrane Helix-2

A key step in transmembrane (TM) signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the ligand-induced conformational change of the receptor, which triggers the activation of a guanine nucleotide-binding protein. GPCRs contain a seven-TM helical structure essential for signal transduction in response to a large variety of sensory and hormonal signals. Primary structure comparison of GPCRs has shown that the second TM helix contains a highly conserved Asp residue, which is critical for agonist activation in these receptors. How conformational changes in TM2 relate to signal transduction by a GPCR is not known, because activation-induced conformational changes in TM2 helix have not been measured. Here we use modification of reporter cysteines to measure water accessibility at specific residues in TM2 of the type 1 receptor for the octapeptide hormone angiotensin II. Activation-dependent changes in the accessibility of Cys76 on TM2 were measured in constitutively activated mutants. These changes were directly correlated with measurement of function, establishing the link between physical changes in TM2 and function. Accessibility changes were measured at several consecutive residues on TM2, which suggest that TM2 undergoes a transmembrane movement in response to activation. This is the first report of in situ measurement of TM2 movement in a GPCR.     

Conserved activation pathways in G-protein-coupled receptors

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are seven-transmembrane helix proteins that transduce exogenous and endogenous signals to modulate the activity of downstream effectors inside the cell. Despite the relevance of these proteins in human physiology and pharmaceutical research, we only recently started to understand the structural basis of their activation mechanism. In the period 2008-2011, nine active-like structures of GPCRs were solved. Among them, we have determined the structure of light-activated rhodopsin with all the features of the active metarhodopsin-II, which represents so far the most native-like model of an active GPCR. This structure, together with the structures of other inactive, intermediate and active states of rhodopsin constitutes a unique structural framework on which to understand the conserved aspects of the activation mechanism of GPCRs. This mechanism can be summarized as follows: retinal isomerization triggers a series of local structural changes in the binding site that are amplified into three intramolecular activation pathways through TM (transmembrane helix) 5/TM3, TM6 and TM7/TM2. Sequence analysis strongly suggests that these pathways are conserved in other GPCRs. Differential activation of these pathways by ligands could be translated into the stabilization of different active states of the receptor with specific signalling properties.     

Mutation of a single TMVI residue, Phe(282), in the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor results in structurally distinct activated receptor conformations

We showed previously that Phe(303) in transmembrane segment (TM) VI of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1B)-AR), a residue conserved in many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is critically involved in coupling agonist binding with TM helical movement and G protein activation. Here the equivalent residue, Phe(282), in the beta(2)-AR was evaluated by mutation to glycine, asparagine, alanine, or leucine. Except for F282N, which exhibits attenuated basal and maximal isoproterenol stimulation, the Phe(282) mutants display varying degrees of constitutive activity (F282L > F282A > F282G), and as shown by the results of substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) studies, induce movement of endogenous cysteine(s) into the water-accessible ligand-binding pocket. For F282A, movement is confined to Cys(285) in TMVI, whereas F282L induces movement of both Cys(285) in TMVI and Cys(327) in TMVII. Further, engineered cysteine-sensor studies indicate that F282L causes movement of TMVI, both above and below an apparent kink-inducing TMVI proline (Pro(288)), whereas that due to F282A is confined to the domain below Pro(288). A plausible interpretation of these data is that receptor activation involves rigid body movement of TMVI which, because of its Pro(288)-induced kink, acts as a pivot to transduce and amplify the agonist-induced conformational change in the upper domain, to a change in the lower domain required for productive receptor-G protein coupling.     

How do G-protein-coupled receptors work? The case of metabotropic glutamate and GABA receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane proteins family in animal genomes. Being the receptors for most hormones and neurotransmitters, these proteins play a central role in intercellular communication. GPCRs can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common structural feature: the heptahelical domain. The metabotropic receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) belong to the class III of GPCRs, together with others receptors for Ca2+, for sweet and amino acid taste compounds and for some pheromones, as well as for odorants in fish. Besides their transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation, most of class III receptors possess a large extracellular domain responsible for ligand recognition. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain of one of these receptors, the mGlu1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed an original mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities to develop drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raised a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of other GPCRs.     

Structural basis of activation of bitter taste receptor T2R1 and comparison with Class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

The human bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are non-Class A members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, with very limited structural information. Amino acid sequence analysis reveals that most of the important motifs present in the transmembrane helices (TM1-TM7) of the well studied Class A GPCRs are absent in T2Rs, raising fundamental questions regarding the mechanisms of activation and how T2Rs recognize bitter ligands with diverse chemical structures. In this study, the bitter receptor T2R1 was used to systematically investigate the role of 15 transmembrane amino acids in T2Rs, including 13 highly conserved residues, by amino acid replacements guided by molecular modeling. Functional analysis of the mutants by calcium imaging analysis revealed that replacement of Asn-66(2.65) and the highly conserved Asn-24(1.50) resulted in greater than 90% loss of agonist-induced signaling. Our results show that Asn-24(1.50) plays a crucial role in receptor activation by mediating an hydrogen bond network connecting TM1-TM2-TM7, whereas Asn-66(2.65) is essential for binding to the agonist dextromethorphan. The interhelical hydrogen bond between Asn-24(1.50) and Arg-55(2.54) restrains T2R receptor activity because loss of this bond in I27A and R55A mutants results in hyperactive receptor. The conserved amino acids Leu-197(5.50), Ser-200(5.53), and Leu-201(5.54) form a putative LXXSL motif which performs predominantly a structural role by stabilizing the helical conformation of TM5 at the cytoplasmic end. This study provides for the first time mechanistic insights into the roles of the conserved transmembrane residues in T2Rs and allows comparison of the activation mechanisms of T2Rs with the Class A GPCRs.     

Ligand-specific changes in M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor structure detected by a disulfide scanning strategy

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) function can be modulated by different classes of ligands including full and inverse agonists. At present, little is known about the conformational changes that agonist ligands induce in their target GPCRs. In this study, we employed an in situ disulfide cross-linking strategy to monitor ligand-induced structural changes in a series of cysteine (Cys)-substituted mutant M 3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. One of our goals was to study whether the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain V (TM V), a region known to be critically involved in receptor/G protein coupling, undergoes a major conformational change, similar to the adjacent region of TM VI. Another goal was to determine and compare the disulfide cross-linking patterns observed after treatment of the different mutant receptors with full versus inverse muscarinic agonists. Specifically, we generated 20 double Cys mutant M 3 receptors harboring one Cys substitution within the cytoplasmic end of TM V (L249-I253) and a second one within the cytoplasmic end of TM VI (A489-L492). These receptors were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells and subsequently characterized in pharmacological and disulfide cross-linking studies. Our cross-linking data, in conjunction with a three-dimensional model of the M 3 muscarinic receptor, indicate that M 3 receptor activation does not trigger major structural disturbances within the cytoplasmic segment of TM V, in contrast to the pronounced structural changes predicted to occur at the cytoplasmic end of TM VI. We also demonstrated that full and inverse muscarinic agonists had distinct effects on the efficiency of disulfide bond formation in specific double Cys mutant M 3 receptors. The present study provides novel information about the dynamic changes that accompany M 3 receptor activation and how the receptor conformations induced (or stabilized) by full versus inverse muscarinic agonists differ from each other at the molecular level. Because all class I GPCRs are predicted to share a similar transmembrane topology, the conclusions drawn from the present study should be of broad general relevance.     

Replacement of lysine-181 by aspartic acid in the third transmembrane region of endothelin type B receptor reduces its affinity to endothelin peptides and sarafotoxin 6c without affecting G protein coupling.

A conserved aspartic acid residue in the third transmembrane region of many of the G protein-coupled receptors has been shown to play a role in ligand binding. In the case of endothelin receptors, however, a lysine residue replaces this conserved aspartic acid residue. To access the importance of this residue in ligand binding, we have replaced it with an aspartic acid in the rat endothelin type B (ETb) receptor by PCR mediated mutagenesis. The binding characteristics and functional properties of both the wild type and mutant receptors were determined in COS-7 cells transiently expressing the cloned receptor cDNAs. Using 125I-ET-1 as the radioactive peptide ligand in displacement binding studies, the wild type receptor displayed a typical non-isopeptide-selective binding profile with similar IC50 values (0.2-0.6 nM) for all three endothelin peptides (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3) and sarafotoxin 6c (SRTX 6c). Interestingly, the mutant receptor showed an increase in IC50 values for ET-1 (5 nM), ET-2 (27 nM), and ET-3 (127 nM) but displayed a much larger increase in IC50 value for SRTX 6c (> 10 uM). The lysine mutant receptor still elicited full inositol phosphate (IP) turnover responses in the presence of saturating concentrations of endothelins (10 nM of ET-1, 100 nM of ET-2, or 1 uM of ET-3), indicating that the mutation (K181D) did not affect the coupling of mutant receptor to the appropriate G protein. These results demonstrate that lysine-181 on the receptor is important for binding ET peptides; however, it is required for binding the ETb selective agonist-SRTX 6c.     

An activation switch in the rhodopsin family of G protein-coupled receptors: the thyrotropin receptor

We aimed at understanding molecular events involved in the activation of a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, the thyrotropin receptor. We have focused on the transmembrane region and in particular on a network of polar interactions between highly conserved residues. Using molecular dynamics simulations and site-directed mutagenesis techniques we have identified residue Asn-7.49, of the NPxxY motif of TM 7, as a molecular switch in the mechanism of thyrotropin receptor (TSHr) activation. Asn-7.49 appears to adopt two different conformations in the inactive and active states. These two states are characterized by specific interactions between this Asn and polar residues in the transmembrane domain. The inactive gauche+ conformation is maintained by interactions with residues Thr-6.43 and Asp-6.44. Mutation of these residues into Ala increases the constitutive activity of the receptor by factors of approximately 14 and approximately 10 relative to wild type TSHr, respectively. Upon receptor activation Asn-7.49 adopts the trans conformation to interact with Asp-2.50 and a putatively charged residue that remains to be identified. In addition, the conserved Leu-2.46 of the (N/S)LxxxD motif also plays a significant role in restraining the receptor in the inactive state because the L2.46A mutation increases constitutive activity by a factor of approximately 13 relative to wild type TSHr. As residues Leu-2.46, Asp-2.50, and Asn-7.49 are strongly conserved, this molecular mechanism of TSHr activation can be extended to other members of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors.