Non-random Mating in the Dance Fly Empis borealis: The Importance of Male Choice

In the dance-fly Empis borealis (Diptera, Empididae), females form swarms to which males, carrying a nuptial gift, come for mating. We examined whether males or females were choosy and/or competed for mates. First, measurements of the size relationships between copulating males and females, nuptial gifts and the swarming females from different swarms were assessed. Second, male visiting time in differently sized female swarms was recorded. Larger (wing-length) females participated disproportionately in copulations in each swarm, but not for the population at large. Female mating status (virgin/non-virgin) or proximity to oviposition (egg size) did not influence the likelihood of copulation. No assortative mating pattern was found: male size and size of nuptial gift did not correlate with size of the mating female. The time spent by males in swarms increased with the number of females present and it took longer when males left a swarm without copulation than when doing so. Male visiting time per female was negatively correlated with number of females in swarms. Males more often left smaller than larger swarms without mating. We conclude that E. borealis males discriminate among females but find no evidence for male competition or for female choice. It is still a question to what degree females compete for males.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Hilara</Emphasis> sp. (Diptera: Empididae; Empidinae): Mating System,Swarm Movements,and Inbreeding Avoidance

In a study spanning parts of nine years, an undescribed species of Hilara Meigen was observed to form mating swarms displaying complex behaviors. Typically, swarms were shaped like a flattened torus rotating rapidly about a horizontal axis. Many swarms also moved up and down and turned slowly back-and-forth about a vertical axis. Both up-and-down and turning movements were random in extent and direction, suggesting that they might arise as random, asymmetric density fluctuations within the swarms themselves. A rotating secondary swarm appeared intermittently inside one end of some primary swarms. Swarm membership changed continually as flies left one swarm to join another and as entire swarms coalesced. At one site the set of all swarms displayed properties not found in the swarms individually: spatial extension, daily dissipation and reconstitution over a period of weeks or months, reproductive potential, and gene flow. Such emergent properties qualify the set as a multicomponent swarm, an object heretofore known only in computer models. Hilara sp. appears to be protandrous, univoltine, and promiscuous. Generally, males paired preferentially with somewhat smaller females, but some small and medium-sized males paired with much larger females. Although males of nearly all known Hilara species present nuptial gifts of prey or other items to females, nuptial gifts were not observed at any time during the present study. Many characteristics of swarms of Hilara sp. can be understood as adaptations that reduce inbreeding.     

Why do males of the dance flyEmpis borealis refuse to mate? The importance of female age and size

Empis borealisfemales form swarms, and males carrying a nuptial gift come to swarms to mate. Males either mated with one of the females (accepted swarms) or left swarms without mating (refused swarms). Males mated with the younger (low wing-wear) and relatively larger females in accepted swarms. They seemed to be able to judge the relative size of the females but to ignore their absolute size. Visiting males stayed shorter in accepted swarms as female size variation increased. This probably reflects their greater ease in choosing a mate among females of relatively different sizes. Females in accepted swarms tended to be larger and to have less worn wings than females in rejected swarms.     

Swarming and mating of Aedes communis mosquitoes in nature

The date of the beginning of mating behaviour in males and females, the rate of insemination and the increasing of bloodsucking activity of females were studied in natural environments. Over 80% of females mated on the 3-4th day after emergence; after fertilization their behaviour changed from looking for males for coupling to looking for ones for a prey. The male swarming began on the 5th day after emergence and simultaneously the appearance of inseminated females was observed. The places of mating of males and females were investigated. It was established that coupling took place in swarms with swarming males and out of swarms with freely flying males.     

Sexual selection within mating swarms of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae)

Little is known about the structure of mating aggregations of insects or sexual selection within them. Male lovebugs (Plecia nearctica) hover in large swarms above emergence sites in the ground litter. Females emerge periodically and take flight through the hovering males. Females may be grasped by one or more males before or during flight. Male-male interactions and the structure of lovebug swarms are clearly related to competition for access to emerging females. Lovebug swarms are distinctly stratified vertically: large males at the bottom nearest the ground, medium-sized males in the middle, and small males at the top farthest from the ground. Large males closest to the ground have better access to females and experience greater copulatory success.     

Swarming Behavior, Sexual Dimorphism, and Female Reproductive Status in the Sex Role-Reversed Dance Fly Species Rhamphomyia marginata

Dance flies are predaceous insects which often form male mating swarms. In many species males prior to swarming catch an insect prey, which is presented to the female at mating. In Rhamphomyia marginata, females in contrast to males gather to swarm, while males carrying a prey visit swarms for mating. Here I describe the swarming and courtship behavior in R. marginata and provide data on sexual dimorphism and swarming female reproductive status. Females swarm in small clearings in the forests. There was no specific swarm-maker. The swarming period lasted for 2–3 h and peaked around sunset. Identical swarm sites were used each evening and for several years. The mean number of females in swarms (swarm sites with at least one female) was 9.9 ± 9.1 (range, 1–40; n = 107) in 1993 and 7.1 ± 7.0 (range, 1–35; n = 68) in 1994. No obvious competition between females in swarms was observed. The operational sex ratio in swarms was extremely female biased (all swarms, 0.04). Less than one-third of male visits to swarms resulted in mating and males were found more often in larger swarms. Nuptial prey consisted of male midges. Females seem to mate more than once. Swarming females had undeveloped eggs, whereas mated females in swarms had further developed eggs than unmated females. Amount of sperm in the spermatheca was correlated with egg size. Amount of sperm and egg size did not correlate with wet weight, wing length, or wing load, except for egg size and weight. The wing coloration pattern and shape in R. marginata females are unique among dance flies, being greatly enlarged (1.6 times larger than that of males) and bicolored (gray part, 60% of wing area). When females, instead of males, possess extravagant secondary sexual characters, it is predicted from sexual selection theory that females should compete for males and that males should be selective in their choice of partner. A sex-role reversal will evolve when assess to males limit female reproductive success. The dance fly species R. marginata, like Empis borealis, another dance fly species studied earlier and discussed here, seems to fit these predictions.     

Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host

Sex-role-reversed mating systems in which females compete for males and males may be choosy are usually associated with males investing more than females in offspring. We report that sex-role reversal may also be caused by selfish genetic elements which distort the sex ratio towards females. Some populations of the butterflies Acraea encedon and Acraea encedana are extremely female biased because over 90% of females are infected with a Wolbachia bacterium that is maternally inherited and kills male embryos. Many females in these populations are virgins suggesting that their reproductive success may be limited by access to males. These females form lekking swarms at landmarks in which females exhibit behaviours which we interpret as functioning to solicit matings from males. The hypothesis that female A. encedon swarm in order to mate is supported by the finding that, in release recapture experiments, mated females tend to leave the swarm while unmated females remained. This behaviour is a sex-role-reversed form of a common mating system in insects in which males form lekking swarms at landmarks and compete for females. Female lekking swarms are absent from less female-biased populations and here the butterflies are instead associated with resources in the form of the larval food plant.     

Swarming and mating behavior in Ephemera orientalis Mclachlan, 1875 (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae) with morphological analyses

Swarming and mating behaviors of a mayfly species, Ephemera orientalis Mclachlan, 1875 were observed in 2015, 2016, and 2018 at a river bank of the Asahi River, Japan. Males started to make swarms between late April and middle May in 2016 and 2018. The numbers of mated pairs in a swarm correlated with the numbers of flying males in a swarm in 2016 and 2018. Swarms were formed during a limited period at dusk most probably because that interval is free from natural enemies. Males competed with each other to copulate with females in swarms. We clarified the function of the forelegs of males, which are significantly longer than those of females. Males used their forelegs to hold up a female from below. Besides forelegs, males have longer tails than females. We will discuss why sexual differences are found in these traits. Our results represent the first observation of swarm mating behavior in E. orientalis.     

An alternative mating system in small male insects

Abstract. 1. Small males of all midge (Diptera: Chironomidae and Chaoboridae) species thus far examined (one chaoborid and six chironomids) are rare in mating swarms. They are found instead in vegetation adjacent to the swarm.
2. We show that it is here that females aggregate prior to embarking on mate acquisition flights. In the vegetation females appear to be accessible to males staying behind.
3. Such behaviour in small males may exploit the mate-attracting activities of large males in the swarm and may, at the same time, reduce competition and conserve energy.
4. The evolution and maintenance of these size-related types of mating behaviour are discussed.     

Swarm behaviour and mate competition in mayflies (Ephemeroptera)

Although mayfly swarms are frequently cited as an example of lekking by insects, little is known about the behaviour of individuals within a swarm, or how mate-selection takes place. A study of five species of mayfly over a period of 10 consecutive years has revealed species-specific differences in the flight pattern of swarming males and in the ability of males to recognize swarms of their own species. Males of four of the five species jostle other males in the swarm at all times except when mating: mating pairs are not jostled. The pattern of jostling varies with the species. Measurements of the sperm content of the vesicula seminalis and of the wing length of members of individual swarms show that larger wing size is positively correlated with the presence of less sperm. The vesicula seminalis is always filled with sperm at the beginning of the imaginal stage and the testes regress before the beginning of the imaginal stage. If the volume of sperm in the vesicula seminalis is a valid index of mating success then males with larger wings have the highest success. Large wings may bestow an advantage during jostling. The males of Ephemera danica , which do not jostle, glide with outspread wings; these outspread wings may attract females, the largest wings being the most attractive. Females of all five species enter the swarm a few at a time, although many females may be resting beneath the swarm. This phased entry may decrease the attraction of the swarm for predators. The number of females in a swarm is not correlated with swarm size, and the factors which enable females to regulate their entry into a swarm remain obscure.     

A review of the reproductive behavior of Polyphemus pediculus (L.) Müller (Crustacea: Branchiopoda)

The reproductive behavior of Polyphemus pediculus (L.) includes mating, laying of resting eggs and giving birth to juveniles. All these forms of behavior are performed in a population daily and simultaneously by means of individual and social actions. Individual behavior is manifested by certain sets of stereotyped movements which can be observed at any time of the day and at any location in a water body. Individual behavior has an episodic, stable character and low intensity. Social behavior is accomplished by specimens of similar physiological state who form transitory swarms. They form within the main continually existing main swarms of the population. Social behavior is rhythmic and of high intensity. Reproductive parthenogenetic swarms first form around dawn and later during the day: about noon in May–July and before sunset in Autumn. As swarms of parthenogenetic females disintegrate, swarms of old gamogenetic females form and mass laying of resting eggs begins. Young gamogenetic females and males swarm only when resting-egg-laying swarms disintegrate. Parthenogenetic reproduction peaks in northern Russia in May and August and persists until late September. Swarms of resting-egg-laying females form once a day around dawn, from May to September. Mating swarms form in summer in midmorning, at twilight and on moonlit nights. In Autumn, there is only one peak of mating, in midmorning. Intensity, duration and time of manifestation of different forms of social behavior change from spring to autumn. Location and character of their manifestation are predictable.     

Swarming behavior in male chironomid midges: a cost-benefit analysis

Aerial mating swarms of nonbiting male midges form at dusk andattract females from the surrounding vegetation. Females flyinto the swarm, and copulation occurs on the wing. Mating andpredation are identified as the major benefit and cost of swarmingand are influenced by swarm size in opposing ways. Swarms varygreatly in size but the individual's probability of mating isgreatest in the smallest swarms. However, the individual predationrisk is also greatest in the smallest swarms. These opposingeffects on swarm size combine in a common currency of matingsuccess per evening to favor males in the smallest swarms. Thereis also an effect of male body size. The smallest males occurpredominantly in the smallest swarms and have the highest matingsuccess. The mechanisms that might maintain the observed swarmsize distribution are discussed.     

Pelagic swarms and beach strandings of the squat lobster Munida gregaria (Anomura: Munididae) in the Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego

The present article is the first formal record of pelagic swarms and beach strandings of the squat lobster Munida gregaria in the Beagle Channel, southern South America. To describe size composition and natural diet of beach strandings and swarms, samples from strandings were taken in April 2007, March 2008 and March 2010. Samples from swarms were taken in May 2007 and April 2010. Also, during November 2008 and January 2009, two acoustic surveys were carried out to describe both, horizontal distribution and school metrics of swarms. Pelagic swarms and beach strandings were composed of 100% individuals of the morph gregaria of M. gregaria. Mean size of males and females in both, beach strandings and swarms, were similar. The diet of pelagic M. gregaria was composed mainly of crustaceans, unicellular algae and small macroalgae, sediment and particulate organic matter. Swarms of pelagic Munida took the shape of extended layers of varying density and height. Their positions in the water column were also variable: swarms were found at different depths, from the subsurface layer to near the sea bottom. Occasionally, some large swarms occupied most of the water column. In the Beagle Channel, SW winds during spring tides could be a forcing factor for M. gregaria strandings. The absence of shoaling animals in the Beagle Channel between 1997 and 2002 and the recent occurrence of swarms are coincident with their appearance in other locations in Patagonia. In consequence, we hypothesize that the factor influencing the formation of swarms must be acting at a regional scale.     

Competition for access to mates predicts female-specific ornamentation and male investment in relative testis size

Sexually selected ornaments are highly variable and the factors that drive variation in ornament expression are not always clear. Rare instances of female-specific ornament evolution (such as in some dance fly species) are particularly puzzling. While some evidence suggests that such rare instances represent straightforward reversals of sexual selection intensity, the distinct nature of trade-offs between ornaments and offspring pose special constraints in females. To examine whether competition for access to mates generally favors heightened ornament expression, we built a phylogeny and conducted a comparative analysis of Empidinae dance fly taxa that display female-specific ornaments. We show that species with more female-biased operational sex ratios in lek-like mating swarms have greater female ornamentation, and in taxa with more ornate females, male relative testis investment is increased. These findings support the hypothesis that ornament diversity in dance flies depends on female receptivity to mates, which is associated with contests for nutritious nuptial gifts provided by males. Moreover, our results suggest that increases in female receptivity lead to higher levels of sperm competition among males. The incidence of both heightened premating sexual selection on females and postmating selection on males contradicts assertions that sex roles are straightforwardly reversed in dance flies.     

Swarming, Delayed Sexual Maturation of Males, and Mating Behavior of Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

Fopius arisanus is unusual among hymenopterous parasitoids in males having an obligatory premating period. We confirmed Hagen's (1953) view that sperm takes several days to migrate from the testes to the seminal vesicles. Males mated for the first time only 4 days after emergence, the time that sperm was first ever recorded in the seminal vesicles. In the field, we studied the sexual maturation of F. arisanus males in relation to their behavior. In general, sexually immature males were found in male-only swarms that persisted over several days in host tree canopies. Mature males were usually found in loose aggregations in the vegetation beneath host trees. Females entered these loose aggregations and were mated, whereas they were generally absent from swarms in the canopy. Swarming is therefore apparently not a primary component of the sexual communication system of the species. We describe, for the first time in F. arisanus, the behavioral sequence that accompanies the intersexual communication that leads to mating. Males probably release a volatile chemical that attracts females from a distance, but we have only circumstantial evidence for this. We also postulate that males may form aggregations to amplify the effects of this distance attractant. In the vicinity of males, females release a pheromone that attracts males, a process we demonstrated with female-baited sticky traps.     

Age-associated male mating success in three swarming caddis fly species (Trichoptera: Leptoceridae)

Abstract. 1. In the three caddis fly species, Athripsodes albifrons (L.), A. cinereus (Curtis) and Mystacides azurea (L.) (Leptoceridae; Trichoptera), males swarm above the water surface of lakes or rivers. Receptive females fly to swarms and are chased and/or courted by males. After one of the swarming males has grasped an approaching female, the pair flies in tandem to the shore where they copulate.
2. In males, wing wear indices were negatively correlated with the ratio of fat/dry weight. In the only species in which comparisons were possible between newly emerged and swarming males (M. azurea), the former had significantly lower indices. Unmated females on average had lower wing wear indices than spent females. These facts suggest that wing wear reflects relative age.
3. The tandem males had significantly less wing wear than those in swarms, and are probably therefore younger. Age is therefore likely to be significant in relation to mating success.
4. Among males of the same relative age, tandem males had higher fat ratio than swarming ones, indicating that male mating success was also influenced by traits other than age. It is suggested that the shortest possible duration of the period of adult prematurity is adaptive, especially in insects with marginal adult food intake.     

Mating system ofTokunagayusurika akamusi (Diptera: Chironomidae): I. Copulation in the air by swarming and on the ground by searching

Observations on the mating system of the midge,Tokunagayusurika akamusi, revealed mating to occur both in the air by swarming and on the ground by searching. At the shores of Lake Biwa, midges appeared from November to early December. Newly emerged adults arrived at the resting place, lakeside vegetation, in the morning, during which time a number of males also walked about in search of mates. Many copulating pairs were observed at the resting place. Huge swarms occurred chiefly before sunset but the frequency of copulation observed in the swarm was extremely low. It is likely that, in the Lake Biwa population, the proportion of females inseminated by searching males at the resting place was much larger than that by swarming males in the air. Furthermore, by searching, males copulated with younger females than by swarming. The differences between the searching and swarming tactics are discussed.     

Assortative mating in mixed swarms of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae s.s. M and S molecular forms,in Burkina Faso,West Africa

The molecular form composition of Anopheles gambiae Giles s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae) mating swarms and the associated mating pairs (copulae) were investigated during two rainy seasons (July to October, 2005 and July to November, 2006) in the villages of Soumousso and Vallée du Kou (VK7). Although the habitats of these villages differ markedly, sympatric populations of M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae s.s. occur in both places periodically. The main aim was to assess the degree to which these molecular forms mate assortatively. In Soumousso, a wooded savannah habitat, the majority of swarm samples consisted of only S‐form males (21/28), although a few M‐form males were found in mixed M‐ and S‐form swarms. In VK7, a rice growing area, the majority of swarm samples consisted of only M‐form males (38/62), until October and November 2006, when there were nearly as many mixed‐form as single‐form swarms. Overall, ～60% of M‐ and S‐form swarms were temporally or spatially segregated; the two forms were effectively prevented from encountering each other. Of the remaining 40% of swarms, however, only about half were single‐form and the rest were mixed‐form. Of the 33 copulae collected from mixed‐form swarms, only four were mixed‐form pairs, significantly fewer than expected by random pairing between forms (χ² = 10.34, d.f. = 2, P < 0.01). Finally, all specimens of inseminated females were of the same form as the sperm contained within their spermatheca (n = 91), even for the four mixed‐form copulae. These findings indicate that assortative mating occurs within mixed‐form swarms, mediated most probably by close‐range mate recognition cues.     

Male body size and mating success in swarms of the mayfly Epeorus longimanus

Epeorus longimanus is a widely distributed mayfly in the western United States that forms relatively large mating swarms. The operational sex ratio of swarms is highly male biased and males are potentially polygynous, suggesting that male-male competition over mates may be intense. We investigated whether body size influenced male mating success in E. longimanus , as evidence of sexual selection. Males collected as mating pairs had significantly greater body lengths compared with males collected randomly from the swarm on each of six sampling dates examined, and had significantly greater head widths than males from random collections on two dates. There was no indication that large males occupied preferred positions within the swarm, and we suspect that the large male advantage may be due to greater success in pursuing females. We found no evidence of size-assortative mating in E. longimanus indicating that males attempt to male with every female encountered, consistent with the brief copulatory period in mayflies and overall low parental investment of males.     

Swarm Site Fidelity in the Sex Role-Reversed Dance Fly Empis borealis

In the dance fly species Empis borealis (L.), females (1–40) gather to swarm at landmarks (swarm markers, like trees and bushes), and males carrying an insect prey visit these swarms for mating. We noticed earlier that some swarm sites were used for several years and that they appeared to be frequented by a similar number of swarming females in each year, although the numbers of females varied greatly among swarm sites and certain sites attracted more swarming individuals than others. To explore swarm site fidelity in this mating system, in 1993 we monitored the same swarm sites that we studied in 1989, addressing the questions, Would the same swarm sites still attract the same number of females and males after 4 years? and Why do some swarm sites attract more displaying females than others? The number of females swarming at the different markers in 1993 was approximately the same as 4 years earlier. Some of these swarm sites are known to have been used for 18 years. The swarm sites with the largest number of flies had a high sun exposure during the day and were found at coniferous swarm marker trees and in a mixed forest habitat. A swarm site with few females attending and with a low amount of insolation during the day can be predicted to be abandoned as a swarming site soon. Empis borealis swarm sites thus persist over many years and are attended by a similar number of individuals each year. To our knowledge, such site fidelity has not been demonstrated for any swarming insect species earlier.