Recognition and interaction of CphA from Aeromonas hydrophila with imipenem and biapenem by spectroscopic analysis in combination with molecular docking

The molecular recognition and interaction of CphA from Aeromonas hydrophila with imipenem (Imip) and biapenem (Biap) were studied by means of the combined use of fluorescence spectra and molecular docking. The results showed that both the fluorescence quenching of CphA by Imip and Biap were caused through the combined dynamic and static quenching, and the latter was dominating in the process; the microenvironment and conformational of CphA were altered upon the addition of Imip and Biap from synchronous and three‐dimensional fluorescence. The binding of CphA with Imip or Biap caused a conformational change in the loop of CphA, and through the conformational change, the loop opened the binding pocket of CphA to allow for an induced fit of the newly introduced ligand. In the binding of CphA with Imip, the whole molecule entered into the active pocket of CphA. The binding was driven by enthalpy change, and the binding force between them was mainly hydrogen bonding and Van der Waals force; whereas in the binding of CphA with Biap, only the beta‐lactam ring of Biap entered into the binding pocket of CphA while the side chain was located outside the active pocket. The binding was driven by the enthalpy change and entropy change together, and the binding force between them was mainly electrostatic interaction. This study provided an insight into the recognition and binding of CphA with antibiotics, which may be helpful for designing new substrate for beta‐lactamase and developing new antibiotics resistant to superbugs.     

The RES domain toxins of RES‐Xre toxin‐antitoxin modules induce cell stasis by degrading NAD+

Type II toxin‐antitoxin (TA) modules, which are important cellular regulators in prokaryotes, usually encode two proteins, a toxin that inhibits cell growth and a nontoxic and labile inhibitor (antitoxin) that binds to and neutralizes the toxin. Here, we demonstrate that the res‐xre locus from Photorhabdus luminescens and other bacterial species function as bona fide TA modules in Escherichia coli. The 2.2 Å crystal structure of the intact Pseudomonas putida RES‐Xre TA complex reveals an unusual 2:4 stoichiometry in which a central RES toxin dimer binds two Xre antitoxin dimers. The antitoxin dimers each expose two helix‐turn‐helix DNA‐binding domains of the Cro repressor type, suggesting the TA complex is capable of binding the upstream promoter sequence on DNA. The toxin core domain shows structural similarity to ADP‐ribosylating enzymes such as diphtheria toxin but has an atypical NAD⁺‐binding pocket suggesting an alternative function. We show that activation of the toxin in vivo causes a depletion of intracellular NAD⁺ levels eventually leading to inhibition of cell growth in E. coli and inhibition of global macromolecular biosynthesis. Both structure and activity are unprecedented among bacterial TA systems, suggesting the functional scope of bacterial TA toxins is much wider than previously appreciated.     

Conformational selection in protein binding and function

Protein binding and function often involves conformational changes. Advanced nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments indicate that these conformational changes can occur in the absence of ligand molecules (or with bound ligands), and that the ligands may “select” protein conformations for binding (or unbinding). In this review, we argue that this conformational selection requires transition times for ligand binding and unbinding that are small compared to the dwell times of proteins in different conformations, which is plausible for small ligand molecules. Such a separation of timescales leads to a decoupling and temporal ordering of binding/unbinding events and conformational changes. We propose that conformational‐selection and induced‐change processes (such as induced fit) are two sides of the same coin, because the temporal ordering is reversed in binding and unbinding direction. Conformational‐selection processes can be characterized by a conformational excitation that occurs prior to a binding or unbinding event, while induced‐change processes exhibit a characteristic conformational relaxation that occurs after a binding or unbinding event. We discuss how the ordering of events can be determined from relaxation rates and effective on‐ and off‐rates determined in mixing experiments, and from the conformational exchange rates measured in advanced NMR or single‐molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. For larger ligand molecules such as peptides, conformational changes and binding events can be intricately coupled and exhibit aspects of conformational‐selection and induced‐change processes in both binding and unbinding direction.     

From signal perception to signal transduction: ligand‐induced dimeric switch of DctB sensory domain in solution

Sinorhizobium meliloti DctB is a typical transmembrane sensory histidine kinase, which senses C₄‐dicarboxylic acids (DCA) and regulates the expression of DctA, the DCA transporter. We previously reported the crystal structures of its periplasmic sensory domain (DctBp) in apo and succinate‐bound states, and these structures showed dramatic conformational changes at dimeric level. Here we show a ligand‐induced dimeric switch in solution and a strong correlation between DctBp's dimerization states and the in vivo activities of DctB. Using site‐directed mutagenesis, we identify important determinants for signal perception and transduction. Specifically, we show that the ligand‐binding pocket is essential for DCA‐induced ‘on’ activity of DctB. Mutations at different sections of DctBp's dimerization interface can lock full‐length DctB at either ‘on’ or ‘off’ state, independent of ligand binding. Taken together, these results suggest that DctBp's signal perception and transduction occur through a ‘ligand‐induced dimeric switch’, in which the changes in the dimeric conformations upon ligand binding are responsible for the signal transduction in DctB.     

A novel mechanism of ligand binding and release in the odorant binding protein 20 from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae

Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes that transmit malaria are attracted to humans by the odor molecules that emanate from skin and sweat. Odorant binding proteins (OBPs) are the first component of the olfactory apparatus to interact with odorant molecules, and so present potential targets for preventing transmission of malaria by disrupting the normal olfactory responses of the insect. AgamOBP20 is one of a limited subset of OBPs that it is preferentially expressed in female mosquitoes and its expression is regulated by blood feeding and by the day/night light cycles that correlate with blood‐feeding behavior. Analysis of AgamOBP20 in solution reveals that the apo‐protein exhibits significant conformational heterogeneity but the binding of odorant molecules results in a significant conformational change, which is accompanied by a reduction in the conformational flexibility present in the protein. Crystal structures of the free and bound states reveal a novel pathway for entrance and exit of odorant molecules into the central‐binding pocket, and that the conformational changes associated with ligand binding are a result of rigid body domain motions in α‐helices 1, 4, and 5, which act as lids to the binding pocket. These structures provide new insights into the specific residues involved in the conformational adaptation to different odorants and have important implications in the selection and development of reagents targeted at disrupting normal OBP function.     

Exploration of the conformational landscape in pregnane X receptor reveals a new binding pocket

Ligand‐regulated pregnane X receptor (PXR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, plays a central role in xenobiotic metabolism. Despite its critical role in drug metabolism, PXR activation can lead to adverse drug‐drug interactions and early stage metabolism of drugs. Activated PXR can induce cancer drug resistance and enhance the onset of malignancy. Since promiscuity in ligand binding makes it difficult to develop competitive inhibitors targeting PXR ligand binding pocket (LBP), it is essential to identify allosteric sites for effective PXR antagonism. Here, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies unravelled the existence of two different conformational states, namely “expanded” and “contracted”, in apo PXR ligand binding domain (LBD). Ligand binding events shifted this conformational equilibrium and locked the LBD in a single “ligand‐adaptable” conformational state. Ensemble‐based computational solvent mapping identified a transiently open potential small molecule binding pocket between α5 and α8 helices, named “α8 pocket”, whose opening‐closing mechanism directly correlated with the conformational shift in LBD. A virtual hit identified through structure‐based virtual screening against α8 pocket locks the pocket in its open conformation. MD simulations further revealed that the presence of small molecule at allosteric site disrupts the LBD dynamics and locks the LBD in a “tightly‐contracted” conformation. The molecular details provided here could guide new structural studies to understand PXR activation and antagonism.     

The 2.1 Å crystal structure of an acyl‐CoA synthetase from Methanosarcina acetivorans reveals an alternate acyl‐binding pocket for small branched acyl substrates

The acyl‐AMP forming family of adenylating enzymes catalyze two‐step reactions to activate a carboxylate with the chemical energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. X‐ray crystal structures have been determined for multiple members of this family and, together with biochemical studies, provide insights into the active site and catalytic mechanisms used by these enzymes. These studies have shown that the enzymes use a domain rotation of 140° to reconfigure a single active site to catalyze the two partial reactions. We present here the crystal structure of a new medium chain acyl‐CoA synthetase from Methanosarcina acetivorans. The binding pocket for the three substrates is analyzed, with many conserved residues present in the AMP binding pocket. The CoA binding pocket is compared to the pockets of both acetyl‐CoA synthetase and 4‐chlorobenzoate:CoA ligase. Most interestingly, the acyl‐binding pocket of the new structure is compared with other acyl‐ and aryl‐CoA synthetases. A comparison of the acyl‐binding pocket of the acyl‐CoA synthetase from M. acetivorans with other structures identifies a shallow pocket that is used to bind the medium chain carboxylates. These insights emphasize the high sequence and structural diversity among this family in the area of the acyl‐binding pocket. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.