Decreased Mitochondrial Activities of Malate Dehydrogenase and Fumarase in Tomato Lead to Altered Root Growth and Architecture via Diverse Mechanisms

Transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants in which either mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase or fumarase was antisense inhibited have previously been characterized to exhibit altered photosynthetic metabolism. Here, we demonstrate that these manipulations also resulted in differences in root growth, with both transgenics being characterized by a dramatic reduction of root dry matter deposition and respiratory activity but opposite changes with respect to root area. A range of physiological, molecular, and biochemical experiments were carried out in order to determine whether changes in root morphology were due to altered metabolism within the root itself, alterations in the nature of the transformants'' root exudation, consequences of alteration in the efficiency of photoassimilate delivery to the root, or a combination of these factors. Grafting experiments in which the transformants were reciprocally grafted to wild-type controls suggested that root length and area were determined by the aerial part of the plant but that biomass was not. Despite the transgenic roots displaying alteration in the expression of phytohormone-associated genes, evaluation of the levels of the hormones themselves revealed that, with the exception of gibberellins, they were largely unaltered. When taken together, these combined experiments suggest that root biomass and growth are retarded by root-specific alterations in metabolism and gibberellin contents. These data are discussed in the context of current models of root growth and biomass partitioning.The structure of the plant tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle has been established for decades (Beevers, 1961), and in vitro studies have established regulatory properties of many of its component enzymes (Budde and Randall, 1990; Millar and Leaver, 2000; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2005). That said, relatively little is known, as yet, regarding how this important pathway is regulated in vivo (Fernie et al., 2004a; Sweetlove et al., 2007). Indeed, even fundamental questions concerning the degree to which this pathway operates in illuminated leaves (Tcherkez et al., 2005; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007a) and the influence it has on organic acid levels in fruits (Burger et al., 2003) remain contentious. Furthermore, in contrast to many other pathways of primary metabolism, the TCA cycle has been subjected to relatively few molecular physiological studies. To date, the functions of pyruvate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, aconitase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, succinyl-CoA ligase, fumarase, and malate dehydrogenase have been studied via this approach (Landschütze et al., 1995; Carrari et al., 2003; Yui et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a; Lemaitre et al., 2007; Studart-Guimarães et al., 2007); however, several of these studies were relatively cursory. Despite this fact, they generally corroborate one another, with at least two studies providing clear evidence for an important role of the TCA cycle in flower development (Landschütze et al., 1995; Yui et al., 2003) or in the coordination of photosynthetic and respiratory metabolisms of the illuminated leaf (Carrari et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a).In our own studies on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), we have observed that modulation of fumarase and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activities leads to contrasting shoot phenotypes, with the former displaying stunted growth while the later exhibited an enhanced photosynthetic performance (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a). We were able to demonstrate that the stunted-growth phenotype observed in aerial parts of the fumarase plants was a consequence of altered stomatal function (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2007a), whereas the increased photosynthetic performance of the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase seems likely to be mediated by the alterations in ascorbate metabolism exhibited by these plants (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005; Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2006). In keeping with the altered rates of photosynthesis in these antisense plants, the fruit yield of fumarase and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase plants was decreased and increased, respectively. However, the root biomass of both transgenics was significantly reduced (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005, 2007a). These observations were somewhat surprising given that it is estimated that 30% to 60% of net photosynthate is transported to root organs (Merckx et al., 1986; Nguyen et al., 1999; Singer et al., 2003). When taken together, these results suggest that the root phenotype must result from either an impairment of translocation or a root-specific effect. Neither of these explanations is without precedence, with inhibition of the expression of Suc transporters (Riesmeier et al., 1993; Gottwald et al., 2000) resulting in dramatically impaired root growth while organic acid exudation itself has been implicated in a wide range of root organ functions, including nutrient acquisition (de la Fuente et al., 1997; Imas et al., 1997; Neumann and Römheld, 1999; López-Bucio et al., 2000; Anoop et al., 2003; Delhaize et al., 2004), metal sequestration (Gillooly et al., 1983; de la Fuente et al., 1997; Cramer and Titus, 2001), and microbial proliferation in the rhizosphere (Lugtenberg et al., 1999; Weisskopf et al., 2005). In addition to the putative mechanisms listed above, the TCA cycle could be anticipated to play a vital role in meeting the high energy demands of nitrogen fixation and polymer biosynthesis associated with rapidly growing heterotrophic organs (Pradet and Raymond, 1983; Dieuaide-Noubhani et al., 1997; Stasolla et al., 2003; Deuschle et al., 2006). In keeping with this theory, alteration of the energy status of roots and other heterotrophic tissue has been documented to positively correlate with elevated biomass production (Anekonda, 2001; Regierer et al., 2002; Carrari et al., 2003; Lovas et al., 2003; Geigenberger et al., 2005). Here, we performed a detailed physiological, molecular, and biochemical evaluation of whole plant and root metabolism of the mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase and fumarate antisense tomato lines. In this manner, we broadly assessed biochemical changes in the root, including the levels of several major phytohormones, as well as dissected which characteristics were influenced by aerial parts of the plant. The results obtained are discussed both with respect to the regulation of the TCA cycle per se and within the context of the determination of root morphology and growth.     

Extracellular DNA Is Required for Root Tip Resistance to Fungal Infection

Plant defense involves a complex array of biochemical interactions, many of which occur in the extracellular environment. The apical 1- to 2-mm root tip housing apical and root cap meristems is resistant to infection by most pathogens, so growth and gravity sensing often proceed normally even when other sites on the root are invaded. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown but appears to involve a mucilaginous matrix or “slime” composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and detached living cells called “border cells.” Here, we report that extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a component of root cap slime and that exDNA degradation during inoculation by a fungal pathogen results in loss of root tip resistance to infection. Most root tips (>95%) escape infection even when immersed in inoculum from the root-rotting pathogen Nectria haematococca. By contrast, 100% of inoculated root tips treated with DNase I developed necrosis. Treatment with BAL31, an exonuclease that digests DNA more slowly than DNase I, also resulted in increased root tip infection, but the onset of infection was delayed. Control root tips or fungal spores treated with nuclease alone exhibited normal morphology and growth. Pea (Pisum sativum) root tips incubated with [³²P]dCTP during a 1-h period when no cell death occurs yielded root cap slime containing ³²P-labeled exDNA. Our results suggest that exDNA is a previously unrecognized component of plant defense, an observation that is in accordance with the recent discovery that exDNA from white blood cells plays a key role in the vertebrate immune response against microbial pathogens.Root diseases caused by soil-borne plant pathogens are a perennial source of crop loss worldwide (Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986). These diseases are of increasing concern, as pesticides like methyl bromide are removed from the market due to environmental concerns (Gilreath et al., 2005). One possible alternative means of crop protection is to exploit natural mechanisms of root disease resistance (Nelson, 1990; Goswami and Punja, 2008; Shittu et al., 2009). Direct observation of root systems under diverse conditions has revealed that root tips, in general, are resistant to infection even when lesions are initiated elsewhere on the same plant root (Foster et al., 1983; Bruehl, 1986; Curl and Truelove, 1986; Smith et al., 1992; Gunawardena et al., 2005; Wen et al., 2007). This form of disease resistance is important for crop production because root growth and its directional movement in response to gravity, water, and other signals can proceed normally as long as the root tip is not invaded. The 1- to 2-mm apical region of roots houses the root meristems required for root growth and cap development, and when infection does occur, root development ceases irreversibly within a few hours even in the absence of severe necrosis (Gunawardena and Hawes, 2002). Mechanisms underlying root tip resistance to infection are unclear, but the phenomenon appears to involve root cap “slime,” a mucilaginous matrix produced by the root cap (Morré et al., 1967; Rougier et al., 1979; Foster, 1982; Chaboud, 1983; Guinel and McCully, 1986; Moody et al., 1988; Knee et al., 2001; Barlow, 2003; Iijima et al., 2008). Within the root cap slime of cereals, legumes, and most other crop species are specialized populations of living cells called root “border cells” (Supplemental Fig. S1; Hawes et al., 2000). Border cell numbers increase in response to pathogens and toxins such as aluminum, and the cell populations maintain a high rate of metabolic activity even after detachment from the root cap periphery (Brigham et al., 1995; Miyasaka and Hawes, 2000).As border cells detach from roots of cereals and legumes, a complex of more than 100 proteins, termed the root cap secretome, is synthesized and exported from living cells into the matrix ensheathing the root tip (Brigham et al., 1995). The profile of secreted proteins changes in response to challenge with soil-borne bacteria (De-la-Peña et al., 2008). In pea (Pisum sativum), root tip resistance to infection is abolished in response to proteolytic degradation of the root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). In addition to an array of antimicrobial enzymes and other proteins known to be components of the extracellular matrix and apoplast of higher plants, the DNA-binding protein histone H4 unexpectedly was found to be present among the secreted proteins (Wen et al., 2007). One explanation for the presence of histone is global leakage of material from disrupted nuclei in dead cells, but no cell death occurs during delivery of the secretome (Brigham et al., 1995; Wen et al., 2007). An alternative explanation for the presence of a secreted DNA-binding protein is that extracellular DNA (exDNA) also is present in root cap slime.exDNA has long been known to be a component of slimy biological matrices ranging from purulent localized human infections to bacterial capsules, biofilms, and snail exudate (Sherry and Goeller, 1950; Leuchtenberger and Schrader, 1952; Braun and Whallon, 1954; Smithies and Gibbons, 1955; Catlin, 1956; Fahy et al., 1993; Allesen-Holm et al., 2006; Spoering and Gilmore, 2006; Qin et al., 2007; Izano et al., 2008). Specialized white blood cells in humans and other species including fish recently have been shown to deploy a complex neutrophil extracellular “trap” (NET), composed of DNA and a collection of enzymes, in response to infection (Brinkmann et al., 2004; Brinkmann and Zychlinsky, 2007; Palić et al., 2007; Wartha et al., 2007; Yousefi et al., 2008). NETs appear to kill bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens by localizing them within a matrix of antimicrobial peptides and proteins (Urban et al., 2006; Wartha et al., 2007; Guimaraes-Costa et al., 2009). Several extracellular peptides and proteins implicated in neutrophil function, including histone, also are present within the pea root cap secretome (Wen et al., 2007). exDNA linked with extracellular histone is a structural component of NETs, and treatment with DNase destroys NET integrity and function (Wartha et al., 2007). Moreover, human pathogens including group A Streptococcus and Streptococcus pneumoniae release extracellular DNase (Sherry and Goeller, 1950). When these activities are eliminated by mutagenesis of the encoding genes, bacteria lose their normal ability to escape the NET and multiply at the site of infection (Sumby et al., 2005; Buchanan et al., 2006). Here, we report that, in addition to histone and other secretome proteins, exDNA also is a component of root cap slime. When this exDNA is digested enzymatically, root tip resistance to infection is abolished.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Cell Type-Specific Gene Expression Analyses by RNA Sequencing Reveal Local High Nitrate-Triggered Lateral Root Initiation in Shoot-Borne Roots of Maize by Modulating Auxin-Related Cell Cycle Regulation

Plants have evolved a unique plasticity of their root system architecture to flexibly exploit heterogeneously distributed mineral elements from soil. Local high concentrations of nitrate trigger lateral root initiation in adult shoot-borne roots of maize (Zea mays) by increasing the frequency of early divisions of phloem pole pericycle cells. Gene expression profiling revealed that, within 12 h of local high nitrate induction, cell cycle activators (cyclin-dependent kinases and cyclin B) were up-regulated, whereas repressors (Kip-related proteins) were down-regulated in the pericycle of shoot-borne roots. In parallel, a ubiquitin protein ligase S-Phase Kinase-Associated Protein1-cullin-F-box protein^{S-Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2B}-related proteasome pathway participated in cell cycle control. The division of pericycle cells was preceded by increased levels of free indole-3-acetic acid in the stele, resulting in DR5-red fluorescent protein-marked auxin response maxima at the phloem poles. Moreover, laser-capture microdissection-based gene expression analyses indicated that, at the same time, a significant local high nitrate induction of the monocot-specific PIN-FORMED9 gene in phloem pole cells modulated auxin efflux to pericycle cells. Time-dependent gene expression analysis further indicated that local high nitrate availability resulted in PIN-FORMED9-mediated auxin efflux and subsequent cell cycle activation, which culminated in the initiation of lateral root primordia. This study provides unique insights into how adult maize roots translate information on heterogeneous nutrient availability into targeted root developmental responses.Roots have developed adaptive strategies to reprogram their gene expression and metabolic activity in response to heterogeneous soil environments (Osmont et al., 2007). By this way, local environmental stimuli can be integrated into the developmental program of roots (Forde, 2014; Giehl and von Wirén, 2014). In resource-depleted environments, an important heterogeneously distributed soil factor is nutrient availability, which then directs lateral root growth preferentially into nutrient-rich patches (Zhang and Forde, 1998; Lima et al., 2010; Giehl et al., 2012). Such directed lateral root development depends on regulatory networks that integrate both local and systemic signals to coordinate them with the overall plant nutritional status (Ruffel et al., 2011; Guan et al., 2014). As shown by the impact of the N status-dependent regulatory module CLAVATA3/EMBRYO-SURROUNDING REGION-related peptides-CLAVATA1 leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase, economizing the costs for root development is pivotal for a resource-efficient strategy in nutrient acquisition (Araya et al., 2014). In recent years, strategies on yield and efficiency improvement have been developed that are primarily based on the manipulation of root system architecture (Gregory et al., 2013; Lynch, 2014; Meister et al., 2014). A common imperative of these strategies is to develop crops that use water and nutrients more efficiently, allowing the reduction of fertilizer input and potentially hazardous environmental contamination.Maize (Zea mays) plays an eminent role in global food, feed, and fuel production, which is also a consequence of its unique root system (Rogers and Benfey, 2015). The genetic analysis of maize root architecture revealed a complex molecular network coordinating root development during the whole lifecycle (for review, see Hochholdinger et al., 2004a, 2004b). Identification of root type-specific lateral root mutants in maize emphasized the existence of regulatory mechanisms involved in the branching of embryonic roots, which are distinct from those in postembryonic roots (Hochholdinger and Feix, 1998; Woll et al., 2005). Under heterogeneous nutrient supplies, nitrate-rich patches increased only the length of lateral roots in primary and seminal roots, whereas they increased both length and density of lateral roots from shoot-borne roots of adult maize plants (Yu et al., 2014a). Remarkably, modulation of the extensive postembryonic shoot-borne root stock has a great potential to improve grain yield and nutrient use efficiency (Hochholdinger and Tuberosa, 2009).Lateral root branching is critical to secure anchorage and ensure adequate uptake of water and nutrients. In maize, these roots originate from concentric single-file layers of pericycle and endodermis cells (Fahn, 1990; Jansen et al., 2012). Lateral root initiation is the result of auxin-dependent cell cycle progression (Beeckman et al., 2001; Jansen et al., 2013a). Most of the molecular changes during the cell cycle like, for instance, the induction of positive regulators, such as cyclins (CYCs) and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), and the repression of Kip-related proteins (KRPs), thus account for a reactivation of the cell cycle (Beeckman et al., 2001; Himanen et al., 2002, 2004). In eukaryotes, ubiquitin-mediated degradation of cell cycle proteins plays a critical role in the regulation of cell division (Hershko, 2005; Jakoby et al., 2006). Conjugation of ubiquitin to a substrate requires the sequential action of three enzymes: ubiquitin-activating enzyme, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3). The E3 enzymes are responsible for the specificity of the pathway, and several classes of E3 enzymes have been implicated in cell cycle regulation, including the S-Phase Kinase-Associated Protein1-cullin-F-box protein (SCF) and Really Interesting New Gene (RING) finger-domain ubiquitin ligases (Del Pozo and Manzano, 2014). The F-box protein S-Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2B (SKP2B) encodes an F-box ubiquitin ligase, which plays an important role in the cell cycle by regulating the stability of KRP1 and pericycle founder cell division during lateral root initiation (Ren et al., 2008; Manzano et al., 2012).It has been shown that auxin is involved in long-distance signaling to adjust root growth in response to local nutrient availability (Giehl et al., 2012), and it is likely to serve in long-distance signaling for local nutrient responses as well (for review, see Rubio et al., 2009; Krouk et al., 2011; Saini et al., 2013; Forde, 2014). Polar auxin transport is instrumental for the generation of local auxin maxima, which guide these cells to switch their developmental program (Vanneste and Friml, 2009; Lavenus et al., 2013). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the PIN-FORMED (PIN) family of auxin efflux carrier proteins controls the directionality of auxin flows to maximum formation at the tip or pericycle cells (Benková et al., 2003; Laskowski et al., 2008; Marhavý et al., 2013). Auxin responses in protoxylem or protophloem cells of the basal meristem coincide with the site of lateral root initiation (De Smet et al., 2007; Jansen et al., 2012). In these defined pericycle cells, the phloem pole pericycle founder cells are primed before auxin accumulation occurs (De Smet et al., 2007; Jansen et al., 2012, 2013a). In contrast to dicots, the larger PIN family in monocots has a more divergent phylogenetic structure (Paponov et al., 2005). It is likely that monocot-specific PIN genes regulate monocot-specific morphogenetic processes, such as the development of a complex root system (Wang et al., 2009; Forestan et al., 2012).The molecular control of lateral root initiation of the root system to heterogeneous nitrate availabilities is not yet understood in maize. In this study, the plasticity of lateral root induction in adult shoot-borne roots of maize in response to local high concentration of nitrate was surveyed in an experimental setup that simulated patchy nitrate distribution. RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) experiments and cell type-specific gene expression analyses showed that local nitrate triggers progressive cell cycle control during pericycle cell division. In addition, tissue-specific determination of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and its metabolites combined with auxin maxima determination by DR5 supported a role of basipetal auxin transport during lateral root initiation in shoot-borne roots. Thereby, this study provides unique insights in how auxin orchestrates cell cycle control under local nitrate stimulation in the shoot-borne root system of maize.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.