Regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 Complex Assembly by Phosphatidic Acid: Competition with Rapamycin

mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin, is a critical node for control of cell growth and survival and has widely been implicated in cancer survival signals. mTOR exists in two complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2. Phospholipase D (PLD) and its metabolite phosphatidic acid (PA) have been implicated in the regulation of mTOR; however, their role has been controversial. We report here that suppression of PLD prevents phosphorylation of the mTORC1 substrate S6 kinase (S6K) at Thr389 and the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473. Suppression of PLD also blocked insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 and the mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of PRAS40. Importantly, PA was required for the association of mTOR with Raptor to form mTORC1 and that of mTOR with Rictor to form mTORC2. The effect of PA was competitive with rapamycin—with much higher concentrations of rapamycin needed to compete with the PA-mTORC2 interaction than with PA-mTORC1. Suppressing PA production substantially increased the sensitivity of mTORC2 to rapamycin. Data provided here demonstrate a PA requirement for the stabilization of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes and reveal a mechanism for the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on mTOR. This study also suggests that by suppressing PLD activity, mTORC2 could be targeted therapeutically with rapamycin.It has become apparent during the past decade that a critical aspect of tumor progression is the suppression of default apoptotic programs that constitute what is likely the most important protection against cancer. Cellular signals that suppress apoptosis have come to be known as “survival signals.” A common node for survival signals is mTOR, the mammalian target of rapamycin (5, 13, 14, 25). mTOR exists in two distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (21), that differ in their subunit composition and sensitivity to rapamycin. mTORC1 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), whereas mTORC2 consists of a complex that includes mTOR and a protein known as Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) (13, 14). There are also mTORC2 complexes that can be distinguished by association with different isoforms of mSin1 (9). While much is known about the regulation of mTORC1 (21), very little is known about the regulation of mTORC2.mTORC1 is highly sensitive to rapamycin, whereas mTORC2 is relatively insensitive to rapamycin (21). However, it was recently reported that long-term exposure to rapamycin prevented the formation of mTORC2 complexes and blocked the phosphorylation of the mTORC2 substrate Akt at Ser473 (24, 38). Rapamycin, in association with FK506 binding protein 12 (FKBP12), has been reported to interact with mTOR in a manner that is competitive with phosphatidic acid (PA), the metabolic product of phospholipase D (PLD) (2, 4). PLD, like mTOR, has been implicated in survival signals in several human cancer cell lines (1, 10, 11, 27, 32, 39). Since rapamycin-FKBP12 competes with PA for binding to mTOR, the sensitivity of mTORC2 complex formation to rapamycin suggests that PA facilitates the assembly of mTORC2—and ultimately the activation of mTORC2. We report here that the assembly of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes is dependent upon PLD and its metabolite PA. The study also provides mechanistic insight into how rapamycin impacts on mTOR-mediated signals and how PLD regulates mTOR by facilitating the formation of mTOR complexes.     

mTORC1-Activated S6K1 Phosphorylates Rictor on Threonine 1135 and Regulates mTORC2 Signaling

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase that forms two functionally distinct complexes important for nutrient and growth factor signaling. While mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, mTORC2 plays an important role in the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of Akt. Interestingly, mTORC1 negatively regulates Akt activation, but whether mTORC1 signaling directly targets mTORC2 remains unknown. Here we show that growth factors promote the phosphorylation of Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), an essential subunit of mTORC2. We found that Rictor phosphorylation requires mTORC1 activity and, more specifically, the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). We identified several phosphorylation sites in Rictor and found that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 in vitro and in vivo, in a rapamycin-sensitive manner. Phosphorylation of Rictor on Thr1135 did not affect mTORC2 assembly, kinase activity, or cellular localization. However, cells expressing a Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased mTORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Akt. In addition, phosphorylation of the Akt substrates FoxO1/3a and glycogen synthase kinase 3α/β (GSK3α/β) was found to be increased in these cells, indicating that S6K1-mediated phosphorylation of Rictor inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling. Together, our results uncover a new regulatory link between the two mTOR complexes, whereby Rictor integrates mTORC1-dependent signaling.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionarily conserved phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related Ser/Thr kinase that integrates signals from nutrients, energy sufficiency, and growth factors to regulate cell growth as well as organ and body size in a variety of organisms (reviewed in references 4, 38, 49, and 77). mTOR was discovered as the molecular target of rapamycin, an antifungal agent used clinically as an immunosuppressant and more recently as an anticancer drug (5, 20). Recent evidence indicates that deregulation of the mTOR pathway occurs in a majority of human cancers (12, 18, 25, 46), suggesting that rapamycin analogs may be potent antineoplastic therapeutic agents.mTOR forms two distinct multiprotein complexes, the rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mTOR complexes 1 and 2 (mTORC1 and mTORC2), respectively (6, 47). In cells, rapamycin interacts with FKBP12 and targets the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTORC1, thereby inhibiting some of its function (13, 40, 66). mTORC1 is comprised of the mTOR catalytic subunit and four associated proteins, Raptor (regulatory associated protein of mTOR), mLST8 (mammalian lethal with sec13 protein 8), PRAS40 (proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa), and Deptor (28, 43, 44, 47, 59, 73, 74). The small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain) is a key upstream activator of mTORC1 that is negatively regulated by the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 GTPase-activating protein complex (reviewed in reference 35). mTORC1 is activated by PI3K and Ras signaling through direct phosphorylation and inactivation of TSC2 by Akt, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p90 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RSK) (11, 37, 48, 53, 63). mTORC1 activity is also regulated at the level of Raptor. Whereas low cellular energy levels negatively regulate mTORC1 activity through phosphorylation of Raptor by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (27), growth signaling pathways activating the Ras/ERK pathway positively regulate mTORC1 activity through direct phosphorylation of Raptor by RSK (10). More recent evidence has also shown that mTOR itself positively regulates mTORC1 activity by directly phosphorylating Raptor at proline-directed sites (20a, 75). Countertransport of amino acids (55) and amino acid signaling through the Rag GTPases were also shown to regulate mTORC1 activity (45, 65). When activated, mTORC1 phosphorylates two main regulators of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, the AGC (protein kinase A, G, and C) family kinase p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and thus stimulates protein synthesis and cellular growth (50, 60).The second mTOR complex, mTORC2, is comprised of mTOR, Rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR), mSin1 (mammalian stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase-interacting protein 1), mLST8, PRR5 (proline-rich region 5), and Deptor (21, 39, 58, 59, 66, 76, 79). Rapamycin does not directly target and inhibit mTORC2, but long-term treatment with this drug was shown to correlate with mTORC2 disassembly and cytoplasmic accumulation of Rictor (21, 39, 62, 79). Whereas mTORC1 regulates hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of S6K1, mTORC2 has been shown to phosphorylate other members of the AGC family of kinases. Biochemical and genetic evidence has demonstrated that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser473 (26, 39, 68, 70), thereby contributing to growth factor-mediated Akt activation (6, 7, 52). Deletion or knockdown of the mTORC2 components mTOR, Rictor, mSin1, and mLST8 has a dramatic effect on mTORC2 assembly and Akt phosphorylation at Ser473 (26, 39, 79). mTORC2 was also shown to regulate protein kinase Cα (PKCα) (26, 66) and, more recently, serum- and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase 1 (SGK1) (4, 22). Recent evidence implicates mTORC2 in the regulation of Akt and PKCα phosphorylation at their turn motifs (19, 36), but whether mTOR directly phosphorylates these sites remains a subject of debate (4).Activation of mTORC1 has been shown to negatively regulate Akt phosphorylation in response to insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) (reviewed in references 30 and 51). This negative regulation is particularly evident in cell culture models with defects in the TSC1/TSC2 complex, where mTORC1 and S6K1 are constitutively activated. Phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) by mTORC1 (72) and its downstream target S6K1 has been shown to decrease its stability and lead to an inability of insulin or IGF1 to activate PI3K and Akt (29, 69). Although the mechanism is unknown, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGF-Rβ) has been found to be downregulated in TSC1- and TSC2-deficient murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), contributing to a reduction of PI3K signaling (80). Interestingly, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation by mTORC1 has also been observed in the presence of growth factors other than IGF-1, insulin, or PDGF, suggesting that there are other mechanisms by which mTORC1 activation restricts Akt activity in cells (reviewed in references 6 and 31). Recent evidence demonstrates that rapamycin treatment causes a significant increase in Rictor electrophoretic mobility (2, 62), suggesting that phosphorylation of the mTORC2 subunit Rictor may be regulated by mTORC1 or downstream protein kinases.Herein, we demonstrate that Rictor is phosphorylated by S6K1 in response to mTORC1 activation. We demonstrate that Thr1135 is directly phosphorylated by S6K1 and found that a Rictor mutant lacking this phosphorylation site increases Akt phosphorylation induced by growth factor stimulation. Cells expressing the Rictor T1135A mutant were found to have increased Akt signaling to its substrates compared to Rictor wild-type- and T1135D mutant-expressing cells. Together, our results suggest that Rictor integrates mTORC1 signaling via its phosphorylation by S6K1, resulting in the inhibition of mTORC2 and Akt signaling.     

Site-Specific mTOR Phosphorylation Promotes mTORC1-Mediated Signaling and Cell Growth

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) functions as a rapamycin-sensitive environmental sensor that promotes cellular biosynthetic processes in response to growth factors and nutrients. While diverse physiological stimuli modulate mTORC1 signaling, the direct biochemical mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation remain poorly defined. Indeed, while three mTOR phosphorylation sites have been reported, a functional role for site-specific mTOR phosphorylation has not been demonstrated. Here we identify a new site of mTOR phosphorylation (S1261) by tandem mass spectrometry and demonstrate that insulin-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in both mTORC1 and mTORC2. Here we focus on mTORC1 and show that TSC/Rheb signaling promotes mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in an amino acid-dependent, rapamycin-insensitive, and autophosphorylation-independent manner. Our data reveal a functional role for mTOR S1261 phosphorylation in mTORC1 action, as S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1-mediated substrate phosphorylation (e.g., p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 [S6K1] and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1) and cell growth to increased cell size. Moreover, Rheb-driven mTOR S2481 autophosphorylation and S6K1 phosphorylation require S1261 phosphorylation. These data provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function and suggest a model whereby insulin-stimulated mTOR S1261 phosphorylation promotes mTORC1 autokinase activity, substrate phosphorylation, and cell growth.The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine protein kinase, senses and integrates signals from diverse environmental cues (14, 31, 50, 74). mTOR associates with different partner proteins to form functionally distinct signaling complexes (4). The immunosuppressive drug rapamycin acutely inhibits signaling by mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) (22), which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, raptor, and PRAS40 (24, 33, 34, 54, 67). Rapamycin fails to acutely inhibit signaling by mTORC2, which contains mTOR, mLST8/GβL, rictor, mSin1, and PRR5/Protor (18, 32, 47, 55, 73, 76). mTORC1 promotes various biosynthetic processes, including protein synthesis, cell growth (an increase in cell mass and size), and cell proliferation (an increase in cell number) (14, 40, 74). During growth factor (e.g., insulin) and nutrient (e.g., amino acids and glucose) sufficiency, mTORC1 phosphorylates the translational regulators p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1) to coordinately upregulate protein biosynthesis (40). Both S6K1 and 4EBP1 contain a TOR signaling motif, which mediates their interaction with raptor and thus facilitates their recruitment to the mTOR kinase (10, 44, 57, 58). In addition to regulating protein synthesis, mTORC1-mediated phosphorylation of S6K1 and 4EBP also promotes cell growth and cell cycle progression (15, 16). While more recently identified and thus less well characterized than mTORC1, mTORC2 mediates the phosphorylation of AGC kinase family members (e.g., Akt [also known as protein kinase B, PKB], PKCα, and SGK1) on their hydrophobic motifs and modulates the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (20, 26, 32, 55, 56).The insulin pathway represents the best-characterized activator of mTORC1 signaling to date, and thus many signaling intermediates that link insulin receptor activation to mTORC1 have been identified (12, 31). Complementary work using Drosophila melanogaster genetics and mammalian cell culture identified TSC1 (hamartin) and TSC2 (tuberin) as upstream negative regulators of mTORC1 (27). Inactivation of either the TSC1 or TSC2 genes, whose protein products heterodimerize to form a tumor suppressor complex, causes the development of benign tumors in diverse organs in both humans and rodents, a disease known as tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (36). TSC2 contains a GTPase-activating protein domain that acts on Rheb, a Ras-like GTP binding protein that activates mTORC1 (27). Thus, in TSC-deficient cells, constitutive Rheb-GTP leads to chronically high mTORC1 signaling. While the mechanism by which Rheb-GTP activates mTORC1 remains incompletely understood, Rheb coimmunoprecipitates with mTOR and directly activates mTORC1 kinase activity in vivo and in vitro when GTP bound (2, 38, 54). Rheb has been reported to augment the activity of PLD1, an enzyme that catalyzes the production of the lipid second messenger phosphatidic acid, which contributes to the mitogenic activation of mTORC1 signaling (13, 62). Additionally, Rheb-GTP was reported to induce the dissociation of the endogenous mTOR inhibitor FKBP38 (3), although aspects of this model have been questioned (72). Insulin/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling reduces the inhibitory effect of TSC on mTORC1 via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (29, 42, 64). Additionally, Ras-regulated signaling via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and RSK also inhibits TSC via PI3K/Akt-independent phosphorylation of TSC2 (39, 51, 63). In contrast, glucose deprivation enhances TSC''s inhibitory effect on mTORC1 signaling via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 (on different sites) (30). Thus, TSC functions as a central nexus of diverse physiological signals to fine-tune mTORC1 signaling depending on environmental conditions (27). While the mechanism by which amino acids promote mTORC1 signaling has remained elusive, compelling new data reveal that the Rag GTPases link amino acid sensing to mTORC1 activation (35, 52, 53). During amino acid sufficiency, GTP-bound Rag heterodimers bind raptor and recruit mTORC1 to an endomembrane compartment that contains the mTORC1 activator Rheb; thus, amino acid sufficiency may function to prime mTORC1 for subsequent growth factor-mediated activation via a dynamic subcellular redistribution mechanism (52).Despite the well-characterized regulation of mTORC1 signaling by growth factors (e.g., insulin), nutrients (e.g., amino acids and glucose), and cellular stress (e.g., hypoxia) and the identification of numerous signaling mediators of these pathways, the direct molecular mechanisms by which cellular signals modulate mTORC1 action remain obscure (31). While three phosphorylation sites (P-sites) on mTOR have been reported to date (T2446, S2448, and S2481), no function has yet been ascribed to any site (7, 43, 49, 59). Here we identify S1261 as a novel mTOR phosphorylation site in vivo in cultured mammalian cells and provide the first evidence that site-specific mTOR phosphorylation regulates mTORC1 function. We show that insulin signals via the PI3K/TSC/Rheb pathway in an amino acid-dependent and rapamycin-insensitive manner to promote mTOR S1261 phosphorylation, which regulates mTORC1 autokinase activity, biochemical signaling to downstream substrates, and cell growth to increased cell size, a major cellular function of mTORC1. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying mTORC1 regulation will enable us to better understand how mTORC1 senses environmental stimuli to control cellular physiology. As aberrantly upregulated mTORC1 signaling likely contributes to cancer, insulin-resistant diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, understanding mTORC1 regulation may aid in the development of novel therapeutics for these prevalent human diseases (11, 21, 28).     

Glycolytic Flux Signals to mTOR through Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase-Mediated Regulation of Rheb

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) interacts with raptor to form the protein complex mTORC1 (mTOR complex 1), which plays a central role in the regulation of cell growth in response to environmental cues. Given that glucose is a primary fuel source and a biosynthetic precursor, how mTORC1 signaling is coordinated with glucose metabolism has been an important question. Here, we found that the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) binds Rheb and inhibits mTORC1 signaling. Under low-glucose conditions, GAPDH prevents Rheb from binding to mTOR and thereby inhibits mTORC1 signaling. High glycolytic flux suppresses the interaction between GAPDH and Rheb and thus allows Rheb to activate mTORC1. Silencing of GAPDH or blocking of the Rheb-GAPDH interaction desensitizes mTORC1 signaling to changes in the level of glucose. The GAPDH-dependent regulation of mTORC1 in response to glucose availability occurred even in TSC1-deficient cells and AMPK-silenced cells, supporting the idea that the GAPDH-Rheb pathway functions independently of the AMPK axis. Furthermore, we show that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, a glycolytic intermediate that binds GAPDH, destabilizes the Rheb-GAPDH interaction even under low-glucose conditions, explaining how high-glucose flux suppresses the interaction and activates mTORC1 signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that the glycolytic flux regulates mTOR''s access to Rheb by regulating the Rheb-GAPDH interaction, thereby allowing mTORC1 to coordinate cell growth with glucose availability.The mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) signal transduction pathway acts as a central controller of cell growth in mammals (20, 23, 29). mTORC1 integrates a wide range of intracellular and extracellular signals, including insulin, availability of nutrients (glucose and amino acids), cellular energy status, and hypoxia, to regulate protein synthesis and cell growth (11, 12, 17, 36, 46). Many of these environmental cues are integrated into tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC1-TSC2), the major upstream regulator of mTORC1. In response to the absence of insulin and to the low-energy status of cells, the TSC1-TSC2 complex stimulates the GTPase function of Rheb, a small GTPase that acts as a proximal key activator of mTORC1, which leads to the inhibition of Rheb-mediated mTORC1 activation. In contrast, inactivation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex results in the accumulation of GTP-bound Rheb and thus activation of mTORC1 (3, 13, 21, 27, 32, 39). For this reason, both the loss of TSC proteins and the overexpression of Rheb cause hyperactivation of mTORC1 signaling, which is frequently observed in many common human cancers (2, 5, 19, 25, 33). Therefore, a tight regulation of Rheb activity is critical for the proper operation of the mTORC1 pathway in response to environmental cues.Rheb is an atypical member of the Ras superfamily of GTPases (1, 10, 47). As with other small GTPases, the activity of Rheb is regulated by its guanine nucleotide binding status. However, the negative control of GTP-bound Rheb by the TSC1-TSC2 complex has only recently been investigated, and the regulation of the nucleotide binding status of Rheb is not fully understood. A recent study proposed that translationally controlled tumor protein may function as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rheb that causes the accumulation of GTP-bound Rheb (18). GTP-bound Rheb is essential for activating mTOR kinase (21, 28, 38). However, the interaction between Rheb and mTOR does not depend on the GTP binding status of Rheb (30), raising questions regarding the mechanism by which Rheb activates mTORC1. Recently, FKBP38 (immunophilin FK506-binding protein, 38 kDa) was found to be a direct binding partner of Rheb and an inhibitor of mTORC1 (4). GTP-bound Rheb binds FKBP38 and releases FKBP38 from mTORC1, resulting in activation of the mTORC1 pathway. However, there have been conflicting results regarding the effects of nutrient availability on Rheb activity (31, 37, 42, 50) and the effect of these newly identified regulators of Rheb function (44, 45). Thus, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying Rheb regulation and Rheb-mediated mTORC1 activation have remained unclear.In this study, we identified glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (Gly-3-P) dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as a novel Rheb binding protein and a negative regulator of Rheb. We found that the interaction between GAPDH and Rheb is induced when the glycolytic flux is suppressed under low-glucose conditions to inhibit mTORC1. Here, we provide a molecular mechanism underlying the cross talk between the glycolytic flux and the mTORC1 signaling.     

Protein Tyrosine Kinase 6 Directly Phosphorylates AKT and Promotes AKT Activation in Response to Epidermal Growth Factor

Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) is a nonmyristoylated Src-related intracellular tyrosine kinase. Although not expressed in the normal mammary gland, PTK6 is expressed in a majority of human breast tumors examined, and it has been linked to ErbB receptor signaling and AKT activation. Here we demonstrate that AKT is a direct substrate of PTK6 and that AKT tyrosine residues 315 and 326 are phosphorylated by PTK6. Association of PTK6 with AKT occurs through the SH3 domain of PTK6 and is enhanced through SH2 domain-mediated interactions following tyrosine phosphorylation of AKT. Using Src, Yes, and Fyn null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (SYF cells), we show that PTK6 phosphorylates AKT in a Src family kinase-independent manner. Introduction of PTK6 into SYF cells sensitized these cells to physiological levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and increased AKT activation. Stable introduction of active PTK6 into SYF cells also resulted in increased proliferation. Knockdown of PTK6 in the BPH-1 human prostate epithelial cell line led to decreased AKT activation in response to EGF. Our data indicate that in addition to promoting growth factor receptor-mediated activation of AKT, PTK6 can directly activate AKT to promote oncogenic signaling.Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6; also known as the breast tumor kinase BRK) is an intracellular Src-related tyrosine kinase (9, 48). Human PTK6 was identified in cultured human melanocytes (32) and breast tumor cells (39), while its mouse orthologue was cloned from normal small intestinal epithelial cell RNA (50). Although PTK6 shares overall structural similarity with Src family tyrosine kinases, it lacks an N-terminal myristoylation consensus sequence for membrane targeting (39, 51). As a consequence, PTK6 is localized to different cellular compartments, including the nucleus (14, 15). PTK6 is expressed in normal differentiated epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract (34, 42, 51), prostate (14), and skin (51-53). Expression of PTK6 is upregulated in different types of cancers, including breast carcinomas (6, 39, 54), colon cancer (34), ovarian cancer (47), head and neck cancers (33), and metastatic melanoma cells (16). The significance of apparent opposing signaling roles for PTK6 in normal differentiation and cancer is still poorly understood.In human breast tumor cells, PTK6 enhances signaling from members of the ErbB receptor family (10, 29, 30, 36, 40, 49, 54). In the HB4a immortalized human mammary gland luminal epithelial cell line, PTK6 promoted epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced ErbB3 tyrosine phosphorylation and AKT activation (29). In response to EGF stimulation, PTK6 promoted phosphorylation of the focal adhesion protein paxillin and Rac1-mediated cell migration (10). PTK6 can be activated by the ErbB3 ligand heregulin and promotes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in breast cancer cells (40). PTK6 can also phosphorylate p190RhoGAP-A and stimulate its activity, leading to RhoA inactivation and Ras activation and thereby promoting EGF-dependent breast cancer cell migration and proliferation (49). Expression of PTK6 has been correlated with ErbB2 expression in human breast cancers (4, 5, 54).AKT (also called protein kinase B) is a serine-threonine kinase that is activated downstream of growth factor receptors (38). It is a key player in signaling pathways that regulate energy metabolism, proliferation, and cell survival (7, 45). Aberrant activation of AKT through diverse mechanisms has been discovered in different cancers (2). AKT activation requires phosphorylation of AKT on threonine residue 308 and serine residue 473. The significance of phosphorylation of AKT on tyrosine residues is less well understood. Src has been shown to phosphorylate AKT on conserved tyrosine residues 315 and 326 near the activation loop (11). Substitution of these two tyrosine residues with phenylalanine abolished AKT kinase activity stimulated by EGF (11). Use of the Src family inhibitor PP2 impaired AKT activation following IGF-1 stimulation of oligodendrocytes (13). The RET/PTC receptor tyrosine kinase that responds to glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor also phosphorylated AKT tyrosine residue 315 promoting activation of AKT (28). AKT tyrosine residue 474 was phosphorylated when cells were treated with the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate, and phosphorylation of tyrosine 474 contributed to full activation of AKT (12). Recently, the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Ack1 was shown to regulate AKT tyrosine phosphorylation and activation (37).Here we show that AKT is a cytoplasmic substrate of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6. We identify the tyrosine residues on AKT that are targeted by PTK6, and we demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation plays a role in regulating association between PTK6 and AKT. In addition, we show that PTK6 promotes AKT activation and cell proliferation in a Src-independent manner.     

Mitotic Raptor Promotes mTORC1 Activity,G2/M Cell Cycle Progression,and Internal Ribosome Entry Site-Mediated mRNA Translation

The mTOR signaling complex integrates signals from growth factors and nutrient availability to control cell growth and proliferation, in part through effects on the protein-synthetic machinery. Protein synthesis rates fluctuate throughout the cell cycle but diminish significantly during the G₂/M transition. The fate of the mTOR complex and its role in coordinating cell growth and proliferation signals with protein synthesis during mitosis remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, which stimulates protein synthesis, is actually hyperactive during mitosis despite decreased protein synthesis and reduced activity of mTORC1 upstream activators. We describe previously unknown G₂/M-specific phosphorylation of a component of mTORC1, the protein raptor, and demonstrate that mitotic raptor phosphorylation alters mTORC1 function during mitosis. Phosphopeptide mapping and mutational analysis demonstrate that mitotic phosphorylation of raptor facilitates cell cycle transit through G₂/M. Phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor cause cells to delay in G₂/M, whereas depletion of raptor causes cells to accumulate in G₁. We identify cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways as two probable mitosis-regulated protein kinase pathways involved in mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation and altered mTORC1 activity. In addition, mitotic raptor promotes translation by internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) on mRNA during mitosis and is demonstrated to be associated with rapamycin resistance. These data suggest that this pathway may play a role in increased IRES-dependent mRNA translation during mitosis and in rapamycin insensitivity.Cell growth and cell division are tightly coordinated processes required for cells to remain equal in size after division. In unicellular organisms, cell growth and proliferation are coordinated by nutrient availability, whereas their multicellular counterparts must also respond to growth factor input. Both processes lead to organismal growth as well as to increased cell number and cell mass. Cell growth and cell proliferation are also linked via the mTOR signaling pathway (16, 17). The mTOR kinase forms a distinct signaling complex (mTORC1) that participates in the coordination of nutrient and growth factor signaling. mTORC1 is composed of the kinase mTOR, the adaptor protein raptor, and the regulatory protein LST8 (25, 33, 34, 72).Accumulation of cellular proteins leads to cell growth and cell division. However, cell growth occurs only during certain phases of the cell cycle, necessitating that protein synthesis rates oscillate during cell cycling (40). In addition, in quiescent cells in G₀, protein synthesis rates are significantly reduced, whereas a select group of mRNAs maintain active translation (20, 68). During the G₁ phase, overall protein synthesis rates increase through S phase to allow cells to grow and enter another round of cell division while maintaining cell size (2, 3, 42, 45). As with G₀, entrance into mitosis (G₂/M phase) results in a global downregulation by as much as 60 to 80% of cap-dependent mRNA translation in primary, immortalized, and some transformed cells (5, 14, 29).Studies report several possible mechanisms for inhibition of protein synthesis during mitosis. Translation initiation requires the formation of an initiation factor complex known as eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F), which consists of cap binding protein eIF4E, molecular scaffold protein eIF4G, and RNA helicase eIF4A. Together, they recruit ribosomes to mRNAs via bridging interactions between the 7-methyl-GTP (m⁷GTP) 5′ cap and the small 40S ribosomal subunit. Downregulation of protein synthesis during G₂/M was first ascribed to hypophosphorylation of eIF4E and the eIF4E binding proteins (4E-BPs) (5, 46). 4E-BPs are activated by hypophosphorylation, which allows them to bind and sequester eIF4E, preventing it from binding eIF4G and thereby blocking cap-dependent mRNA translation. More recently, several studies suggest that 4E-BP1, the major 4E-BP and a key target of mTORC1, is actually hyperphosphorylated (inactivated) during mitosis (26, 49). It is puzzling, then, that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT network and AKT itself (which modulate mTORC1 activity) are reportedly inactivated during late mitosis (1, 9, 22). In addition, phosphorylation of another mTORC1 target, ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), and its activity are actually highest during G₂/M phase, consistent with elevated mTORC1 activity during mitosis (6).In this study we show that, despite repression of AKT and other activators of mTORC1 activity in mitosis, mTORC1 remains active and phosphorylates 4E-BP1 and S6K1 during G₂/M. We describe the multisite phosphorylation of raptor during mitosis, and we identify seven mitosis-specific raptor phosphorylation sites. By developing phosphomimetic and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of raptor, we show that hyperphosphorylated raptor promotes cell cycle transit through G₂/M, whereas hypophosphorylated raptor promotes transit through G₁. Raptor phosphorylation is shown to involve kinase pathways that are known to be active during mitosis, including cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1 [cdc2]) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) pathways that are also upregulated in certain human cancers, including breast cancers. These and other findings disclose a novel regulatory network for mTORC1 that is active during mitosis, important for G₂/M progression and increased internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation during mitosis, and indirectly associated with rapamycin resistance.     

NF2/Merlin Is a Novel Negative Regulator of mTOR Complex 1, and Activation of mTORC1 Is Associated with Meningioma and Schwannoma Growth

Inactivating mutations of the neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) gene, NF2, result predominantly in benign neurological tumors, schwannomas and meningiomas, in humans; however, mutations in murine Nf2 lead to a broad spectrum of cancerous tumors. The tumor-suppressive function of the NF2 protein, merlin, a membrane-cytoskeleton linker, remains unclear. Here, we identify the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) as a novel mediator of merlin''s tumor suppressor activity. Merlin-deficient human meningioma cells and merlin knockdown arachnoidal cells, the nonneoplastic cell counterparts of meningiomas, exhibit rapamycin-sensitive constitutive mTORC1 activation and increased growth. NF2 patient tumors and Nf2-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts demonstrate elevated mTORC1 signaling. Conversely, the exogenous expression of wild-type merlin isoforms, but not a patient-derived L64P mutant, suppresses mTORC1 signaling. Merlin does not regulate mTORC1 via the established mechanism of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt or mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase-mediated TSC2 inactivation and may instead regulate TSC/mTOR signaling in a novel fashion. In conclusion, the deregulation of mTORC1 activation underlies the aberrant growth and proliferation of NF2-associated tumors and may restrain the growth of these lesions through negative feedback mechanisms, suggesting that rapamycin in combination with phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors may be therapeutic for NF2.Meningiomas are mesenchymal tumors that arise from the arachnoid layer covering the brain and spinal cord and account for approximately 30% of all primary intracranial neoplasms (30). Most sporadic meningiomas (60%) display somatic inactivation of the NF2 gene. Germ line mutations of NF2 are associated with neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by multiple nervous system tumors, including schwannomas and meningiomas (33). Although most meningiomas are benign (WHO grade I), they often cause significant morbidity due to compression of the adjacent brain or spinal cord. Benign meningiomas also have recurrence rates of up to 20% over 10 years. Ten percent of meningiomas are classified as atypical (WHO grade II) or anaplastic (WHO grade III) and display more aggressive clinical behavior, with rapid growth and increased recurrence rates (6, 21). The current standard of care is maximal surgical resection, with adjuvant radiation reserved for progressive tumors or those with aggressive features (e.g., WHO grade II or III). The treatment strategy for meningiomas that progress despite surgery and radiation remains limited, and currently there is no effective chemotherapy.The development of effective therapies has been hampered, in part, by our incomplete understanding of the signals influencing meningioma cell growth. Enhanced expression of certain peptide and steroid growth factors and receptors in meningioma tissue suggests that specific autocrine growth-stimulatory loops may be functionally important in meningioma cell proliferation (20, 38). The scarcity of established meningioma models that would allow for the assessment of growth-regulatory mechanisms has also hampered progress. Recently, we have developed reliable meningioma models that overcome the challenges of the low growth rates and senescence of primary benign meningioma cells (19).Biallelic inactivation of the NF2 gene is detected in the majority of sporadic meningiomas and nearly all schwannomas (11). The tumor suppressor gene NF2 encodes merlin (also called schwannomin), a member of the ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) protein family that functions to link membrane proteins to the cortical actin cytoskeleton (31, 41). Like the ERM proteins, merlin has been implicated in the regulation of membrane organization and cytoskeleton-based cellular processes such as adhesion, migration, cell-cell contact, spreading, proliferation, and signal transduction (27). The loss of contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation is seen in several types of NF2-deficient cells (23, 29). Merlin controls cell proliferation in response to cell contact via CD44 (28) and functions together with the related tumor suppressor Expanded via the Hippo/Mst pathway in both Drosophila and some types of mammalian cells (14, 49). Although merlin is implicated in a wide range of cellular activities, the precise mechanism by which merlin mediates growth-inhibitory functions in human arachnoidal and Schwann cells and the way in which its loss results in tumor formation in NF2 remain poorly understood.We recently reported that primary human merlin-deficient meningioma cells exhibit a striking, enlarged-cell phenotype compared to nonneoplastic arachnoidal cell counterparts derived from the same patient (19). Interestingly, the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) tumor suppressor syndrome is characterized by widespread benign tumors that possess abnormally large cells (22). Mutations in the tumor suppressor genes TSC1 and TSC2 result in TSC syndrome, and the corresponding protein products, hamartin and tuberin (referred to as TSC1 and TSC2), function together as a complex that potently inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) (17). mTOR is an evolutionarily conserved Ser/Thr kinase that exists in one of two distinct functional complexes, TORC1 and TORC2. TORC1, which regulates autophagy, protein translation, and ribosome biogenesis, is potently and specifically inhibited by rapamycin (10, 46). TORC2, which is less sensitive to rapamycin, is important for cytoskeletal regulation and Akt/protein kinase B activation (16, 18, 36).The TSC1-TSC2 complex inhibits mTORC1 by acting as a GTPase-activating protein for the small GTPase Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain). Inactivation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex results in the accumulation of GTP-bound Rheb, which activates mTORC1 (10). In addition to naturally occurring mutations in the TSC1 and TSC2 genes, growth factor stimulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway, as well as Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, leads to the phosphorylation and inactivation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex and consequent activation of mTORC1 (17). The activation of mTORC1 results in the phosphorylation of two well-characterized effectors, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1) and S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), leading to an increase in ribosomal biogenesis and the selective translation of specific mRNA populations. As a critical regulator of cell growth and proliferation, the mTORC1 pathway is dysregulated in several hamartoma syndromes, as well as in many cancers (10).In this report, we identify the NF2 tumor suppressor protein, merlin, as a novel negative regulator of the mTORC1 pathway to control cell growth (cell size). We show that mTORC1 is constitutively activated in merlin-deficient human meningioma cells, leading to increased cell size. Furthermore, we suggest that the slow growth of merlin-deficient meningioma cells is due to a rapamycin-sensitive, mTORC1-S6K-dependent negative feedback loop that diminishes PI3K-Akt signaling in response to growth factor stimulation. The findings of these studies provide insight into the mechanism of merlin tumor suppressor activity and, moreover, indicate that rapamycin or rapamycin analogs in combination with PI3K inhibitors may provide promise as new therapeutics in the treatment of meningiomas and schwannomas.     

TOR Complex 2 Controls Gene Silencing,Telomere Length Maintenance,and Survival under DNA-Damaging Conditions

The Target Of Rapamycin (TOR) kinase belongs to the highly conserved eukaryotic family of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs). TOR proteins are found at the core of two distinct evolutionarily conserved complexes, TORC1 and TORC2. Disruption of TORC1 or TORC2 results in characteristically dissimilar phenotypes. TORC1 is a major cell growth regulator, while the cellular roles of TORC2 are not well understood. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Tor1 is a component of the TORC2 complex, which is particularly required during starvation and various stress conditions. Our genome-wide gene expression analysis of Δtor1 mutants indicates an extensive similarity with chromatin structure mutants. Consistently, TORC2 regulates several chromatin-mediated functions, including gene silencing, telomere length maintenance, and tolerance to DNA damage. These novel cellular roles of TORC2 are rapamycin insensitive. Cells lacking Tor1 are highly sensitive to the DNA-damaging drugs hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate, similar to mutants of the checkpoint kinase Rad3 (ATR). Unlike Rad3, Tor1 is not required for the cell cycle arrest in the presence of damaged DNA. Instead, Tor1 becomes essential for dephosphorylation and reactivation of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc2, thus allowing reentry into mitosis following recovery from DNA replication arrest. Taken together, our data highlight critical roles for TORC2 in chromatin metabolism and in promoting mitotic entry, most notably after recovery from DNA-damaging conditions. These data place TOR proteins in line with other PIKK members, such as ATM and ATR, as guardians of genome stability.The TOR protein kinase is a major cell growth regulator that links cellular growth with cell divisions (18, 42, 64, 65). TOR is an atypical protein kinase conserved from yeast to humans that was isolated as the target of the immunosuppressive and anticancer drug rapamycin (28). TOR proteins can be found in two distinct complexes, known as TORC1 and TORC2 (27, 64). These complexes mediate their distinct cellular functions via phosphorylation and activation of different sets of AGC-like kinases, including mammalian p70S6K, downstream of TORC1, and AKT/protein kinase B (PKB) downstream of TORC2 (18). TORC1 in mammals contains mTOR (Tor1 or Tor2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Tor2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and the Raptor protein (Kog1 in S. cerevisiae; Mip1 in S. pombe). TORC1 in many different eukaryotes plays a central role in the control of growth (mass accumulation) in response to external stimuli, particularly nutrient availability. Disruption of TORC1, either by mutating its components or by rapamycin treatment, can lead to a starvation-like phenotype (64). The cellular roles of TORC2, on the other hand, are less well defined. TORC2 in mammals contains mTOR (Tor2 in S. cerevisiae; Tor1 in S. pombe) together with Rictor (Avo3 in S. cerevisiae; Ste20 in S. pombe) and mSin1 (Avo1 in S. cerevisiae; Sin1 in S. pombe). TORC2 plays a role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton and cell wall integrity pathway in S. cerevisiae (3, 15, 27), a function that is at least partially conserved in human cells (17, 47).Fission yeast contains two TOR homologues, Tor1 and Tor2 (59), which form the TORC2 and TORC1 complexes, respectively (14, 32). Disruption tor2⁺ (TORC1) mimics nitrogen starvation responses (1, 14, 32, 56, 57, 62), while disruption of tor1⁺ (TORC2) results in pleiotropic defects, including elongated cells, sensitivity to osmotic and oxidative stress, inability to execute developmental processes in response to nutrient depletion, and a decrease in amino acid uptake (16, 22, 59). Tor1 regulates cell survival under stress conditions and starvation responses via the AGC protein kinase Gad8, a putative homologue of mammalian AKT/PKB (16).In budding yeast and mammalian cells, TORC1 mediates the rapamycin-sensitive signaling branch while TORC2 is far less sensitive to inhibition by this drug (27, 48). Curiously, rapamycin does not inhibit growth of S. pombe cells but partially inhibits sexual development and amino acid uptake (60-62). Inhibition of amino acid uptake is likely a result of inhibiting Tor1 (61, 62). Accordingly, a tor1 rapamycin-defective allele (tor1^S1834E) confers rapamycin resistance to strains that are dependent on amino acid uptake for their growth (61). Yet rapamycin also induces a response similar to that for a shift from rich to poor nitrogen conditions, an effect that may involve inhibition of both Tor1 and Tor2 (41).While other members of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-related kinase (PIKK) family of proteins, such as ATM and ATR, have been shown to play central roles in the DNA damage response, little is known about roles that TOR proteins might play in such processes. Recently it was shown that the rapamycin-sensitive TORC1 complex participates in regulating cell survival under DNA-damaging conditions (24, 42, 49). Currently, no such role has been attributed to TORC2.Here we show that Tor1 (TORC2) is critical for cell survival under DNA-damaging conditions, gene silencing at heterochromatic regions, and telomere length maintenance and for regulation of cell cycle progression. Since the TOR complexes are highly conserved in evolution, this novel TORC2 function may also be conserved in other organisms.     

Mouse-Specific Residues of Claudin-1 Limit Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2a Infection in a Human Hepatocyte Cell Line

Recently, claudin-1 (CLDN1) was identified as a host protein essential for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. To evaluate CLDN1 function during virus entry, we searched for hepatocyte cell lines permissive for HCV RNA replication but with limiting endogenous CLDN1 expression, thus permitting receptor complementation assays. These criteria were met by the human hepatoblastoma cell line HuH6, which (i) displays low endogenous CLDN1 levels, (ii) efficiently replicates HCV RNA, and (iii) produces HCV particles with properties similar to those of particles generated in Huh-7.5 cells. Importantly, naïve cells are resistant to HCV genotype 2a infection unless CLDN1 is expressed. Interestingly, complementation of HCV entry by human, rat, or hamster CLDN1 was highly efficient, while mouse CLDN1 (mCLDN1) supported HCV genotype 2a infection with only moderate efficiency. These differences were observed irrespective of whether cells were infected with HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) or cell culture-derived HCV (HCVcc). Comparatively low entry function of mCLDN1 was observed in HuH6 but not 293T cells, suggesting that species-specific usage of CLDN1 is cell type dependent. Moreover, it was linked to three mouse-specific residues in the second extracellular loop (L152, I155) and the fourth transmembrane helix (V180) of the protein. These determinants could modulate the exposure or affinity of a putative viral binding site on CLDN1 or prevent optimal interaction of CLDN1 with other human cofactors, thus precluding highly efficient infection. HuH6 cells represent a valuable model for analysis of the complete HCV replication cycle in vitro and in particular for analysis of CLDN1 function in HCV cell entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a liver-tropic plus-strand RNA virus of the family Flaviviridae that has chronically infected about 130 million individuals worldwide. During long-term persistent virus replication, many patients develop significant liver disease which can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (54). Current treatment of chronic HCV infection consists of a combination of pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin. However, this regimen is not curative for all treated patients and is associated with severe side effects (37). Therefore, an improved therapy is needed and numerous HCV-specific drugs targeting viral enzymes are currently being developed (47). These efforts have been slowed down by a lack of small-animal models permissive for HCV replication since HCV infects only humans and chimpanzees. Among small animals, only immunodeficient mice suffering from a transgene-induced disease of endogenous liver cells and repopulated with human primary hepatocytes are susceptible to HCV infection (39).The restricted tropism of HCV likely reflects very specific host factor requirements for entry, RNA replication, assembly, and release of virions. Although HCV RNA replication has been observed in nonhepatic human cells and even nonhuman cells, its efficiency is rather low (2, 11, 59, 67). In addition, so far, efficient production of infectious particles has only been reported with Huh-7 human hepatoma cells, Huh-7-derived cell clones, and LH86 cells (33, 61, 65, 66). Although murine cells sustain HCV RNA replication, they do not produce detectable infectious virions (59). Together, these results suggest that multiple steps of the HCV replication cycle may be blocked or impaired in nonhuman or nonhepatic cells.HCV entry into host cells is complex and involves interactions between viral surface-resident glycoproteins E1 and E2 and multiple host factors. Initial adsorption to the cell surface is likely facilitated by interaction with attachment factors like glycosaminoglycans (4, 31) and lectins (13, 35, 36, 51). Beyond these, additional host proteins have been implicated in HCV entry. Since HCV circulates in the blood associated with lipoproteins (3, 43, 57), it has been postulated that HCV enters hepatocytes via the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R), and evidence in favor of an involvement of LDL-R has been provided (1, 40, 42, 44). Direct interactions between soluble E2 and scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) (53) and CD81 (49) have been reported, and firm experimental proof has accumulated that these host proteins are essential for HCV infection (5, 6, 16, 26, 28, 33, 41, 61). Finally, more recently, claudin-1 (CLDN1) and occludin, two proteins associated with cellular tight junctions, have been identified as essential host factors for infection (20, 34, 50) and an interaction between E2 and these proteins, as revealed by coimmunoprecipitation assays, was reported (7, 34, 63). Although the precise functions of the individual cellular proteins during HCV infection remain poorly defined, based on kinetic studies with antibodies blocking interactions with SR-BI, CD81, or CLDN1, these factors are likely required subsequent to viral attachment (14, 20, 31, 64). Interestingly, viral resistance to antibodies directed against CLDN1 seems to be slightly delayed compared to resistance to antibodies directed against CD81 and SR-BI (20, 64), suggesting that there may be a sequence of events with the virus encountering first SR-BI and CD81 and subsequently CLDN1. Moreover, in Huh-7 cells, engagement of CD81 by soluble E1/E2 induces Rho GTPase-dependent relocalization of these complexes to areas of cell-to-cell contact, where these colocalized with CLDN1 and occludin (9). Together, these findings are consistent with a model where HCV reaches the basolateral, sinusoid-exposed surface of hepatocytes via the circulation. Upon binding to attachment factors SR-BI and CD81, which are highly expressed in this domain (52), the HCV-receptor complex may be ferried to tight-junction-resident CLDN1 and occludin and finally be endocytosed in a clathrin-dependent fashion (8, 38). Once internalized, the viral genome is ultimately delivered into the cytoplasm through a pH-dependent fusion event (24, 26, 31, 58). Recently, Ploss et al. reported that expression of human SR-BI, CD81, CLDN1, and occludin was sufficient to render human and nonhuman cells permissive for HCV infection (50). These results indicate that these four factors are the minimal cell type-specific set of host proteins essential for HCV entry. Interestingly, HCV seems to usurp at least CD81 and occludin in a very species-specific manner since their murine orthologs permit HCV infection with limited efficiency only (22, 50). Recently, it was shown that expression of mouse SR-BI did not fully restore entry function in Huh-7.5 cells with knockdown of endogenous human SR-BI, suggesting that also SR-BI function in HCV entry is, to some extent, species specific (10).In this study, we have developed a receptor complementation system for CLDN1 that permits the assessment of functional properties of this crucial HCV host factor with cell culture-derived HCV (HCVcc) and a human hepatocyte cell line. This novel model is based on HuH6 cells, which were originally isolated from a male Japanese patient suffering from a hepatoblastoma (15). These cells express little endogenous CLDN1, readily replicate HCV RNA, and produce high numbers of infectious HCVcc particles with properties comparable to those of Huh-7 cell-derived HCV. In addition, we identified three mouse-typic residues of CLDN1 that limit receptor function in HuH6 cells. These results suggest that besides CD81 and occludin, and to a minor degree SR-BI, CLDN1 also contributes to the restricted species tropism of HCV.     

p85 Associates with Unphosphorylated PTEN and the PTEN-Associated Complex

The lipid phosphatase PTEN functions as a tumor suppressor by dephosphorylating the D3 position of phosphoinositide-3,4,5-trisphosphate, thereby negatively regulating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway. In mammalian cells, PTEN exists either as a monomer or as a part of a >600-kDa complex (the PTEN-associated complex [PAC]). Previous studies suggest that the antagonism of PI3K/AKT signaling by PTEN may be mediated by a nonphosphorylated form of the protein resident within the multiprotein complex. Here we show that PTEN associates with p85, the regulatory subunit of PI3K. Using newly generated antibodies, we demonstrate that this PTEN-p85 association involves the unphosphorylated form of PTEN engaged within the PAC and also includes the p110β isoform of PI3K. The PTEN-p85 association is enhanced by trastuzumab treatment and linked to a decline in AKT phosphorylation in some ERBB2-amplified breast cancer cell lines. Together, these results suggest that integration of p85 into the PAC may provide a novel means of downregulating the PI3K/AKT pathway.The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway regulates glucose/nutrient homeostasis and cell survival and plays a central role in both normal metabolism and cancer. The PTEN tumor suppressor gene (29, 30, 54) negatively regulates the PI3K/AKT pathway by dephosphorylating the D3 hydroxyl subunit of phosphoinositide-3,4,5-trisphosphate, a key membrane phosphatidylinositol generated by PI3K (34). PTEN undergoes genetic or epigenetic inactivation in many malignancies, including glioblastoma, melanoma, and endometrial, prostate, and breast cancers, among others (6, 13, 22, 23, 47, 49-51, 55, 68). Similarly, germ line mutations of PTEN are associated with the development of hamartomatous neoplasias such as Cowden disease and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome (17, 21, 41).The tumor suppressor function of PTEN undergoes dynamic regulation involving both C-terminal phosphorylation and protein-protein interactions. Phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues at the PTEN C-terminal tail, mediated by kinases such as CK2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3β, alters its conformational structure and association with PDZ domain-containing proteins and attenuates PTEN enzymatic activity (1, 11, 20, 32, 45, 61-63, 66, 67, 71). Conversely, PTEN function is promoted in large part through its stabilization in unphosphorylated form by incorporation into a high-molecular-weight protein complex (the PTEN-associated complex [PAC]) (66). We first demonstrated the existence of the PAC through gel filtration studies of rat liver extracts, which identified PTEN within a high-molecular-mass peak (>600 kDa), as well as a low-molecular-mass peak (40 to 100 kDa) in which PTEN is monomeric and phosphorylated (66). Subsequently, several PDZ domain-containing proteins were shown to interact with PTEN, including MAGI-1b, MAGI-2, MAGI-3, ghDLG, hMAST205, MSP58/MCRS1, NHERF1, and NHERF2, which mediate indirect binding with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor β (25, 36, 42, 57, 66). More recently, LKB1, a serine/threonine kinase tumor suppressor (7), was also found to interact with and phosphorylate PTEN in vitro (36). In aggregate, these data suggest that PTEN functional output is controlled by a complex interplay of protein interactions and regulation of C-terminal phosphorylation.Beyond these interactions, there is also evidence to support additional regulatory mechanisms by which the tumor suppressor function of PTEN is mediated. The herpesvirus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease was shown to interact directly with PTEN and promote its nuclear entry (53). Both ubiquitination and relocalization into the nucleus constitute important PTEN regulatory mechanisms (53, 64). In many tumors, PTEN nuclear exclusion has been associated with poor cancer prognosis and more aggressive cancer development (15, 44, 56). Moreover, successful treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia was shown to be associated with an increase in monoubiquitinylation and relocation of PTEN into the nucleus (53).Like PTEN, the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K serves as a prominent modulator of PI3K/AKT signaling. p85, which exists in three isoforms (α, β, and γ), targets the catalytic (110-kDa) PI3K subunit to the membrane, which brings it into proximity with membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol lipids. In the steady state, p85 forms a tight association with the catalytic PI3K subunit, usually p110α or p110β in nonhematopoietic cells, with p110δ predominating in leukocytes (19). Consistent with this notion, p85 and p110 exist in equimolar ratios in a wide variety of mammalian cell lines and tissues (19), although some studies have suggested a role for free p85 in cell signaling (33, 65).Several recent lines of evidence have begun to support a possible regulatory relationship between PTEN and p85 (reviewed in references 3 and 53). For example, liver-specific deletion of PIK3R1, which encodes the p85α regulatory subunit, reduces both the activation of PI3K and PTEN enzymatic activity in this context. As a result, p85α-deficient hepatic cells express elevated levels of phosphoinositide trisphosphate and exhibit prolonged AKT activation (60). In addition, both PTEN and p85 are regulated by small GTPase proteins such as RhoA, but PTEN coimmunoprecipitates with the RhoA effector Rock only in the presence of PI3K (18, 31, 37). Although only correlative in nature, these findings may suggest a possible role for PTEN in p85 regulation or vice versa, in addition to its known function as a direct antagonist of the PI3K/AKT pathway (3, 9, 52, 57, 60).In the present study, we demonstrate an endogenous association between p85 and PTEN. Using newly generated antibodies that selectively recognize the PTEN C-terminal tail in its unphosphorylated form, we demonstrate that this PTEN-p85 association preferentially involves the unphosphorylated form of PTEN. The specificity of this interaction was confirmed using multiple antibodies and through studies of both human cancer cells and murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) deficient for specific p85 subunits. This association, which also engages p110β, is enhanced by trastuzumab treatment and correlates with diminished AKT phosphorylation. These results support a functional role for the PTEN-p85 association that may have important biological and therapeutic implications for PI3K/AKT pathway regulation.     

Mutations within a Conserved Region of the Hepatitis C Virus E2 Glycoprotein That Influence Virus-Receptor Interactions and Sensitivity to Neutralizing Antibodies

Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 glycoprotein have been widely reported. We identify here a single mutation (N415D) in E2 that arose during long-term passaging of HCV strain JFH1-infected cells. This mutation was located within E2 residues 412 to 423, a highly conserved region that is recognized by several broadly neutralizing antibodies, including the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33. Introduction of N415D into the wild-type (WT) JFH1 genome increased the affinity of E2 to the CD81 receptor and made the virus less sensitive to neutralization by an antiserum to another essential entry factor, SR-BI. Unlike JFH1_WT, the JFH1_N415D was not neutralized by AP33. In contrast, it was highly sensitive to neutralization by patient-derived antibodies, suggesting an increased availability of other neutralizing epitopes on the virus particle. We included in this analysis viruses carrying four other single mutations located within this conserved E2 region: T416A, N417S, and I422L were cell culture-adaptive mutations reported previously, while G418D was generated here by growing JFH1_WT under MAb AP33 selective pressure. MAb AP33 neutralized JFH1_T416A and JFH1_I422L more efficiently than the WT virus, while neutralization of JFH1_N417S and JFH1_G418D was abrogated. The properties of all of these viruses in terms of receptor reactivity and neutralization by human antibodies were similar to JFH1_N415D, highlighting the importance of the E2 412-423 region in virus entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV), which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, has a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome encoding a polyprotein that is cleaved by cellular and viral proteases to yield mature structural and nonstructural proteins. The structural proteins consist of core, E1 and E2, while the nonstructural proteins are p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B (42). The hepatitis C virion comprises the RNA genome surrounded by the structural proteins core (nucleocapsid) and E1 and E2 (envelope glycoproteins). The HCV glycoproteins lie within a lipid envelope surrounding the nucleocapsid and play a major role in HCV entry into host cells (21). The development of retrovirus-based HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) (3) and the cell culture infectious clone JFH1 (HCVcc) (61) has provided powerful tools to study HCV entry.HCV entry is initiated by the binding of virus particles to attachment factors which are believed to be glycosaminoglycans (2), low-density lipoprotein receptor (41), and C-type lectins such as DC-SIGN and L-SIGN (12, 37, 38). Upon attachment at least four entry factors are important for particle internalization. These include CD81 (50), SR-BI (53) and the tight junction proteins claudin-1 (15) and occludin (6, 36, 51).CD81, a member of the tetraspanin family, is a cell surface protein with various functions including tissue differentiation, cell-cell adhesion and immune cell maturation (34). It consists of a small and a large extracellular loop (LEL) with four transmembrane domains. Viral entry is dependent on HCV E2 binding to the LEL of CD81 (3, 50). The importance of HCV glycoprotein interaction with CD81 is underlined by the fact that many neutralizing antibodies compete with CD81 and act in a CD81-blocking manner (1, 5, 20, 45).SR-BI is a multiligand receptor expressed on liver cells and on steroidogenic tissue. It binds to high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) (31). The SR-BI binding site is mapped to the hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) of HCV E2 (53). SR-BI ligands, such as HDL and oxidized LDL have been found to affect HCV infectivity (4, 14, 58-60). Indeed, HDL has been shown to enhance HCV infection in an SR-BI-dependent manner (4, 14, 58, 59). Antibodies against SR-BI and knockdown of SR-BI in cells result in a significant inhibition of viral infection in both the HCVpp and the HCVcc systems (5, 25, 32).Although clearly involved in entry and immune recognition, the more downstream function(s) of HCV glycoproteins are poorly understood, as their structure has not yet been solved. Nonetheless, mutational analysis and mapping of neutralizing antibody epitopes have delineated several discontinuous regions of E2 that are essential for HCV particle binding and entry (24, 33, 45, 47). One of these is a highly conserved sequence spanning E2 residues 412 to 423 (QLINTNGSWHIN). Several broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) bind to this epitope. These include mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33, rat MAb 3/11, and the human MAbs e137, HCV1, and 95-2 (8, 16, 44, 45, 49). Of these, MAbs AP33, 3/11, and e137 are known to block the binding of E2 to CD81.Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the HCV glycoproteins are valuable for investigating the virus interaction(s) with cellular receptors (18). In the present study, we characterize an asparagine-to-aspartic acid mutation at residue 415 (N415D) in HCV strain JFH1 E2 that arose during the long-term passaging of infected human hepatoma Huh-7 cells. Alongside N415D, we also characterize three adjacent cell culture adaptive mutations reported previously and a novel substitution generated in the present study by propagating virus under MAb AP33 selective pressure to gain further insight into the function of this region of E2 in viral infection.     

Residues in a Highly Conserved Claudin-1 Motif Are Required for Hepatitis C Virus Entry and Mediate the Formation of Cell-Cell Contacts

Claudin-1, a component of tight junctions between liver hepatocytes, is a hepatitis C virus (HCV) late-stage entry cofactor. To investigate the structural and functional roles of various claudin-1 domains in HCV entry, we applied a mutagenesis strategy. Putative functional intracellular claudin-1 domains were not important. However, we identified seven novel residues in the first extracellular loop that are critical for entry of HCV isolates drawn from six different subtypes. Most of the critical residues belong to the highly conserved claudin motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄. Alanine substitutions of these residues did not impair claudin-1 cell surface expression or lateral protein interactions within the plasma membrane, including claudin-1-claudin-1 and claudin-1-CD81 interactions. However, these mutants no longer localized to cell-cell contacts. Based on our observations, we propose that cell-cell contacts formed by claudin-1 may generate specialized membrane domains that are amenable to HCV entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major human pathogen that affects approximately 3% of the global population, leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronically infected individuals (5, 23, 42). Hepatocytes are the major target cells of HCV (11), and entry follows a complex cascade of interactions with several cellular factors (6, 8, 12, 17). Infectious viral particles are associated with lipoproteins and initially attach to target cells via glycosaminoglycans and the low-density lipoprotein receptor (1, 7, 31). These interactions are followed by direct binding of the E2 envelope glycoprotein to the scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-B1) and then to the CD81 tetraspanin (14, 15, 33, 36). Early studies showed that CD81 and SR-B1 were necessary but not sufficient for HCV entry, and claudin-1 was discovered to be a requisite HCV entry cofactor that appears to act at a very late stage of the process (18).Claudin-1 is a member of the claudin protein family that participates in the formation of tight junctions between adjacent cells (25, 30, 37). Tight junctions regulate the paracellular transport of solutes, water, and ions and also generate apical-basal cell polarity (25, 37). In the liver, the apical surfaces of hepatocytes form bile canaliculi, whereas the basolateral surfaces face the underside of the endothelial layer that lines liver sinusoids. Claudin-1 is highly expressed in tight junctions formed by liver hepatocytes as well as on all hepatoma cell lines that are permissive to HCV entry (18, 24, 28). Importantly, nonhepatic cell lines that are engineered to express claudin-1 become permissive to HCV entry (18). Claudin-6 and -9 are two other members of the human claudin family that enable HCV entry into nonpermissive cells (28, 43).The precise role of claudin-1 in HCV entry remains to be determined. A direct interaction between claudins and HCV particles or soluble E2 envelope glycoprotein has not been demonstrated (18; T. Dragic, unpublished data). It is possible that claudin-1 interacts with HCV entry receptors SR-B1 or CD81, thereby modulating their ability to bind to E2. Alternatively, claudin-1 may ferry the receptor-virus complex to fusion-permissive intracellular compartments. Recent studies show that claudin-1 colocalizes with the CD81 tetraspanin at the cell surface of permissive cell lines (22, 34, 41). With respect to nonpermissive cells, one group observed that claudin-1 was predominantly intracellular (41), whereas another reported associations of claudin-1 and CD81 at the cell surface, similar to what is observed in permissive cells (22).Claudins comprise four transmembrane domains along with two extracellular loops and two cytoplasmic domains (19, 20, 25, 30, 37). The first extracellular loop (ECL1) participates in pore formation and influences paracellular charge selectivity (25, 37). It has been shown that the ECL1 of claudin-1 is required for HCV entry (18). All human claudins comprise a highly conserved motif, W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄, in the crown of ECL1 (25, 37). The exact function of this domain is unknown, and we hypothesized that it is important for HCV entry. The second extracellular loop is required for the holding function and oligomerization of the protein (25). Claudin-1 also comprises various signaling domains and a PDZ binding motif in the intracellular C terminus that binds ZO-1, another major component of tight junctions (30, 32, 37). We further hypothesized that some of these domains may play a role in HCV entry.To understand the role of claudin-1 in HCV infection, we developed a mutagenesis strategy targeting the putative sites for internalization, glycosylation, palmitoylation, and phosphorylation. The functionality of these domains has been described by others (4, 16, 25, 35, 37, 40). We also mutagenized charged and bulky residues in ECL1, including all six residues within the highly conserved motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄. None of the intracellular domains were found to affect HCV entry. However, we identified seven residues in ECL1 that are critical for entry mediated by envelope glycoproteins derived from several HCV subtypes, including all six residues of the conserved motif. These mutants were still expressed at the cell surface and able to form lateral homophilic interactions within the plasma membrane as well as to engage in lateral interactions with CD81. In contrast, they no longer engaged in homophilic trans interactions at cell-cell contacts. We conclude that the highly conserved motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄ of claudin-1 is important for HCV entry into target cells and participates in the formation of cell-cell contacts.     

Potent and Broadly Reactive HIV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by a Vaccinia Virus Vector Prime-C2V3C3 Polypeptide Boost Immunization Strategy

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects about 1 to 2 million individuals, the majority living in West Africa, Europe, and India. As for HIV-1, new strategies for the prevention of HIV-2 infection are needed. Our aim was to produce new vaccine immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive HIV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Native and truncated envelope proteins from the reference HIV-2ALI isolate were expressed in vaccinia virus or in bacteria. This source isolate was used due to its unique phenotype combining CD4 independence and CCR5 usage. NAbs were not elicited in BALB/c mice by single immunization with a truncated and fully glycosylated envelope gp125 (gp125t) or a recombinant polypeptide comprising the C2, V3, and C3 envelope regions (rpC2-C3). A strong and broad NAb response was, however, elicited in mice primed with gp125t expressed in vaccinia virus and boosted with rpC2-C3. Serum from these animals potently neutralized (median 50% neutralizing titer, 3,200) six of six highly divergent primary HIV-2 isolates. Coreceptor usage and the V3 sequence of NAb-sensitive isolates were similar to that of the vaccinating immunogen (HIV-2ALI). In contrast, NAbs were not reactive on three X4 isolates that displayed major changes in V3 loop sequence and structure. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that broadly reactive HIV-2 NAbs can be elicited by using a vaccinia virus vector-prime/rpC2-C3-boost immunization strategy and suggest a potential relationship between escape to neutralization and cell tropism.Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects 1 to 2 million individuals, most of whom live in India, West Africa, and Europe (17). HIV-2 has diversified into eight genetic groups named A to H, of which group A is by far the most prevalent worldwide. Nucleotide sequences of Env can differ up to 21% within a particular group and by over 35% between groups.The mortality rate in HIV-2-infected patients is at least twice that of uninfected individuals (26). Nonetheless, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals survive as elite controllers (17). In the absence of antiretroviral therapy, the numbers of infected cells (39) and viral loads (36) are much lower among HIV-2-infected individuals than among those who are HIV-1 infected. This may be related to a more effective immune response produced against HIV-2. In fact, most HIV-2-infected individuals have proliferative T-cell responses and strong cytotoxic responses to Env and Gag proteins (17, 31). Moreover, autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are raised in most HIV-2-infected individuals (8, 32, 48, 52), and the virus seems unable to escape from these antibodies (52). As for HIV-1, the antibody specificities that mediate HIV-2 neutralization and control are still elusive. The V3 region in the envelope gp125 has been identified as a neutralizing target by some but not by all investigators (3, 6, 7, 11, 40, 47, 54). Other weakly neutralizing epitopes were identified in the V1, V2, V4, and C5 regions in gp125 and in the COOH-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain (6, 7, 41). A better understanding of the neutralizing determinants in the HIV-2 Env will provide crucial information regarding the most relevant targets for vaccine design.The development of immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs is considered the number one priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field (4, 42). Most current HIV-1 vaccine candidates intended to elicit such broadly reactive NAbs are based on purified envelope constructs that mimic the structure of the most conserved neutralizing epitopes in the native trimeric Env complex and/or on the expression of wild-type or modified envelope glycoproteins by different types of expression vectors (4, 5, 29, 49, 58). With respect to HIV-2, purified gp125 glycoprotein or synthetic peptides representing selected V3 regions from HIV-2 strain SBL6669 induced autologous and heterologous NAbs in mice or guinea pigs (6, 7, 22). However, immunization of cynomolgus monkeys with a subunit vaccine consisting of gp130 (HIV-2BEN) micelles offered little protection against autologous or heterologous challenge (34). Immunization of rhesus (19, 44, 45) and cynomolgus (1) monkeys with canarypox or attenuated vaccinia virus expressing several HIV-2 SBL6669 proteins, including the envelope glycoproteins, in combination with booster immunizations with gp160, gp125, or V3 synthetic peptides, elicited a weak neutralizing response and partial protection against autologous HIV-2 challenge. Likewise, vaccination of rhesus monkeys with immunogens derived from the historic HIV-2ROD strain failed to generate neutralizing antibodies and to protect against heterologous challenge (55). Finally, baboons inoculated with a DNA vaccine expressing the tat, nef, gag, and env genes of the HIV-2UC2 group B isolate were partially protected against autologous challenge without the production of neutralizing antibodies (33). These studies illustrate the urgent need for new vaccine immunogens and/or vaccination strategies that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-2. The present study was designed to investigate in the mouse model the immunogenicity and neutralizing response elicited by novel recombinant envelope proteins derived from the reference primary HIV-2ALI isolate, when administered alone or in different prime-boost combinations.