Centromere pairing by a plasmid-encoded type I ParB protein

The par2 locus of Escherichia coli plasmid pB171 encodes two trans-acting proteins, ParA and ParB, and two cis-acting sites, parC1 and parC2, to which ParB binds cooperatively. ParA is related to MinD and oscillates in helical structures and thereby positions ParB/parC-carrying plasmids regularly over the nucleoid. ParB ribbon-helix-helix dimers bind cooperatively to direct repeats in parC1 and parC2. Using four different assays we obtain solid evidence that ParB can pair parC1- and parC2-encoding DNA fragments in vitro. Convincingly, electron microscopy revealed that ParB mediates binary pairing of parC fragments. In addition to binary complexes, ParB mediated the formation of higher order complexes consisting of several DNA fragments joined by ParB at centromere site parC. N-terminal truncated versions of ParB still possessing specific DNA binding activity were incompetent in pairing, hence identifying the N terminus of ParB as a requirement for ParB-mediated centromere pairing. These observations suggest that centromere pairing is an important intermediate step in plasmid partitioning mediated by the common type I loci.     

ParA‐mediated plasmid partition driven by protein pattern self‐organization

DNA segregation ensures the stable inheritance of genetic material prior to cell division. Many bacterial chromosomes and low‐copy plasmids, such as the plasmids P1 and F, employ a three‐component system to partition replicated genomes: a partition site on the DNA target, typically called parS, a partition site binding protein, typically called ParB, and a Walker‐type ATPase, typically called ParA, which also binds non‐specific DNA. In vivo, the ParA family of ATPases forms dynamic patterns over the nucleoid, but how ATP‐driven patterning is involved in partition is unknown. We reconstituted and visualized ParA‐mediated plasmid partition inside a DNA‐carpeted flowcell, which acts as an artificial nucleoid. ParA and ParB transiently bridged plasmid to the DNA carpet. ParB‐stimulated ATP hydrolysis by ParA resulted in ParA disassembly from the bridging complex and from the surrounding DNA carpet, which led to plasmid detachment. Our results support a diffusion‐ratchet model, where ParB on the plasmid chases and redistributes the ParA gradient on the nucleoid, which in turn mobilizes the plasmid.     

Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament-forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171

Centromere-like loci from bacteria segregate plasmids to progeny cells before cell division. The ParA ATPase (a MinD homologue) of the par2 locus from plasmid pB171 forms oscillating helical structures over the nucleoid. Here we show that par2 distributes plasmid foci regularly along the length of the cell even in cells with many plasmids. In vitro, ParA binds ATP and ADP and has a cooperative ATPase activity. Moreover, ParA forms ATP-dependent filaments and cables, suggesting that ParA can provide the mechanical force for the observed regular distribution of plasmids. ParA and ParB interact with each other in a bacterial two-hybrid assay but do not interact with FtsZ, eight other essential cell division proteins or MreB actin. Based on these observations, we propose a simple model for how oscillating ParA filaments can mediate regular cellular distribution of plasmids. The model functions without the involvement of partition-specific host cell receptors and is thus consistent with the striking observation that partition loci can function in heterologous host organisms.     

ATP-regulated interactions between P1 ParA, ParB and non-specific DNA that are stabilized by the plasmid partition site, parS

Localization of the P1 plasmid requires two proteins, ParA and ParB, which act on the plasmid partition site, parS. ParB is a site-specific DNA-binding protein and ParA is a Walker-type ATPase with non-specific DNA-binding activity. In vivo ParA binds the bacterial nucleoid and forms dynamic patterns that are governed by the ParB-parS partition complex on the plasmid. How these interactions drive plasmid movement and localization is not well understood. Here we have identified a large protein-DNA complex in vitro that requires ParA, ParB and ATP, and have characterized its assembly by sucrose gradient sedimentation and light scattering assays. ATP binding and hydrolysis mediated the assembly and disassembly of this complex, while ADP antagonized complex formation. The complex was not dependent on, but was stabilized by, parS. The properties indicate that ParA and ParB are binding and bridging multiple DNA molecules to create a large meshwork of protein-DNA molecules that involves both specific and non-specific DNA. We propose that this complex represents a dynamic adaptor complex between the plasmid and nucleoid, and further, that this interaction drives the redistribution of partition proteins and the plasmid over the nucleoid during partition.     

Competing ParA Structures Space Bacterial Plasmids Equally over the Nucleoid

Low copy number plasmids in bacteria require segregation for stable inheritance through cell division. This is often achieved by a parABC locus, comprising an ATPase ParA, DNA-binding protein ParB and a parC region, encoding ParB-binding sites. These minimal components space plasmids equally over the nucleoid, yet the underlying mechanism is not understood. Here we investigate a model where ParA-ATP can dynamically associate to the nucleoid and is hydrolyzed by plasmid-associated ParB, thereby creating nucleoid-bound, self-organizing ParA concentration gradients. We show mathematically that differences between competing ParA concentrations on either side of a plasmid can specify regular plasmid positioning. Such positioning can be achieved regardless of the exact mechanism of plasmid movement, including plasmid diffusion with ParA-mediated immobilization or directed plasmid motion induced by ParB/parC-stimulated ParA structure disassembly. However, we find experimentally that parABC from Escherichia coli plasmid pB171 increases plasmid mobility, inconsistent with diffusion/immobilization. Instead our observations favor directed plasmid motion. Our model predicts less oscillatory ParA dynamics than previously believed, a prediction we verify experimentally. We also show that ParA localization and plasmid positioning depend on the underlying nucleoid morphology, indicating that the chromosomal architecture constrains ParA structure formation. Our directed motion model unifies previously contradictory models for plasmid segregation and provides a robust mechanistic basis for self-organized plasmid spacing that may be widely applicable.     

The chromosome partitioning protein, ParB, is required for cytokinesis in Caulobacter crescentus

In Caulobacter crescentus, the genes encoding the chromosome partitioning proteins, ParA and ParB, are essential. Depletion of ParB resulted in smooth filamentous cells in which DNA replication continued. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that the formation of FtsZ rings at the mid-cell, the earliest molecular event in the initiation of bacterial cell division, was blocked in cells lacking ParB. ParB binds sequences near the C. crescentus origin of replication. Cell cycle experiments show that the formation of bipolarly localized ParB foci, and presumably localization of the origin of replication to the cell poles, preceded the formation of FtsZ rings at the mid-cell by 20 min. These results suggest that one major function of ParA and ParB may be to regulate the initiation of cytokinesis in C. crescentus.     

Probing the structure of complex macromolecular interactions by homolog specificity scanning: the P1 and P7 plasmid partition systems.

The P1 plasmid partition locus, P1 par, actively distributes plasmid copies to Escherichia coli daughter cells. It encodes two DNA sites and two proteins, ParA and ParB. Plasmid P7 uses a similar system, but the key macromolecular interactions are species specific. Homolog specificity scanning (HSS) exploits such specificities to map critical contact points between component macromolecules. The ParA protein contacts the par operon operator for operon autoregulation, and the ParB contacts the parS partition site during partition. Here, we refine the mapping of these contacts and extend the use of HSS to map protein-protein contacts. We found that ParB participates in autoregulation at the operator site by making a specific contact with ParA. Similarly, ParA acts in partition by making a specific contact with ParB bound at parS. Both these interactions involve contacts between a C-terminal region of ParA and the extreme N-terminus of ParB. As a single type of ParA-ParB complex appears to be involved in recognizing both DNA sites, the operator and the parS sites may both be occupied by a single protein complex during partition. The general HSS strategy may aid in solving the three-dimensional structures of large complexes of macromolecules.     

Mechanism of DNA segregation in prokaryotes: ParM partitioning protein of plasmid R1 co-localizes with its replicon during the cell cycle.

The parA locus of plasmid R1 encodes a prokaryotic centromere-like system that mediates genetic stabilization of plasmids by an unknown mechanism. The locus codes for two proteins, ParM and ParR, and a centromere-like DNA region (parC) to which the ParR protein binds. We showed recently that ParR mediates specific pairing of parC-containing DNA molecules in vitro. To obtain further insight into the mechanism of plasmid stabilization, we examined the intracellular localization of the components of the parA system. We found that ParM forms discrete foci that localize to specific cellular regions in a simple, yet dynamic pattern. In newborn cells, ParM foci were present close to both cell poles. Concomitant with cell growth, new foci formed at mid-cell. A point mutation that abolished the ATPase activity of ParM simultaneously prevented cellular localization and plasmid partitioning. A parA-containing plasmid localized to similar sites, i.e. close to the poles and at mid-cell, thus indicating that the plasmid co-localizes with ParM. Double labelling of single cells showed that plasmid DNA and ParM indeed co-localize. Thus, our data indicate that parA is a true partitioning system that mediates pairing of plasmids at mid-cell and subsequently moves them to the cell poles before cell division.     

P1 ParA interacts with the P1 partition complex at parS and an ATP-ADP switch controls ParA activities

The partition system of P1 plasmids is composed of two proteins, ParA and ParB, and a cis-acting site parS. parS is wrapped around ParB and Escherichia coli IHF protein in a higher order nucleoprotein complex called the partition complex. ParA is an ATPase that autoregulates the expression of the par operon and has an essential but unknown function in the partition process. In this study we demonstrate a direct interaction between ParA and the P1 partition complex. The interaction was strictly dependent on ParB and ATP. The consequence of this interaction depended on the ParB concentration. At high ParB levels, ParA was recruited to the partition complex via a ParA-ParB interaction, but at low ParB levels, ParA removed or disassembled ParB from the partition complex. ADP could not support these interactions, but could promote the site-specific DNA binding activity of ParA to parOP, the operator of the par operon. Conversely, ATP could not support a stable interaction of ParA with parOP in this assay. Our data suggest that ParA-ADP is the repressor of the par operon, and ParA-ATP, by interacting with the partition complex, plays a direct role in partition. Therefore, one role of adenine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis by ParA is that of a molecular switch controlling entry into two separate pathways in which ParA plays different roles.     

Partition-associated incompatibility caused by random assortment of pure plasmid clusters

Summary Bacterial plasmids and chromosomes encode centromere-like partition loci that actively segregate DNA before cell division. The molecular mechanism behind DNA segregation in bacteria is largely unknown. Here we analyse the mechanism of partition-associated incompatibility for plasmid pB171, a phenotype associated with all known plasmid-encoded centromere loci. An R1 plasmid carrying par2 from plasmid pB171 was destabilized by the presence of an F plasmid carrying parC1, parC2 or the entire par2 locus of pB171. Strikingly, cytological double-labelling experiments revealed no evidence of long-lived pairing of plasmids. Instead, pure R1 and F foci were positioned along the length of the cell, and in a random order. Thus, our results raise the possibility that partition-mediated plasmid incompatibility is not caused by pairing of heterologous plasmids but instead by random positioning of pure plasmid clusters along the long axis of the cell. The strength of the incompatibility was correlated with the capability of the plasmids to compete for the mid-cell position.     

Structural biology of plasmid segregation proteins

DNA segregation, or partition, ensures stable genome transmission during cell division. In prokaryotes, partition is best understood for plasmids, which serve as tractable model systems to decipher the molecular underpinnings of this process. Plasmid partition is mediated by par systems, composed of three essential elements: a centromere-like site and the proteins ParA and ParB. In the first step, ParB binds the centromere to form a large segrosome. Subsequently, ParA, an ATPase, binds the segrosome and mediates plasmid separation. Recently determined ParB-centromere structures have revealed key insights into segrosome assembly, whereas ParA structures have shed light on the mechanism of plasmid separation. These structures represent important steps in elucidating the molecular details of plasmid segregation.     

Altered ParA partition proteins of plasmid P1 act via the partition site to block plasmid propagation

The partition system of the P1 plasmid, P1 par consists of the ParA and ParB proteins and a cis -acting site, parS . It is responsible for the orderly segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. Plasmids with null mutations in parA or parB replicate normally, but missegregate. ParB binds specifically to the parS site, but the role of ParA and its ATPase activity in partition is unclear. We describe a novel class of parA mutants that cannot be established or maintained as plasmids unless complemented by the wild-type gene. One, parAM314I , is conditional: it can be maintained in cells in minimal medium but cannot be established in cells growing in L broth. The lack of plasmid propagation in L broth-grown cells was shown to be caused by a ParB-dependent activity of the mutant ParA protein that blocks plasmid propagation by an interaction at the parS site. Thus, ParA acts to modify the ParB– parS complex, probably by binding to it. Partition is thought to involve selection of pairs of plasmids before segregation, either by physical pairing of copies or by binding of copies to paired host sites. We suggest that ParA is involved in this reaction and that the mutant ParA protein forms paired complexes that cannot unpair.     

Gyrase inhibitors and thymine starvation disrupt the normal pattern of plasmid RK2 localization in Escherichia coli

Multicopy plasmids in Escherichia coli are not randomly distributed throughout the cell but exist as defined clusters that are localized at the mid-cell, or at the 1/4 and 3/4 cell length positions. To explore the factors that contribute to plasmid clustering and localization, E. coli cells carrying a plasmid RK2 derivative that can be tagged with a green fluorescent protein-LacI fusion protein were subjected to various conditions that interfere with plasmid superhelicity and/or DNA replication. The various treatments included thymine starvation and the addition of the gyrase inhibitors nalidixic acid and novobiocin. In each case, localization of plasmid clusters at the preferred positions was disrupted but the plasmids remained in clusters, suggesting that normal plasmid superhelicity and DNA synthesis in elongating cells are not required for the clustering of individual plasmid molecules. It was also observed that the inhibition of DNA replication by these treatments produced filaments in which the plasmid clusters were confined to one or two nucleoid bodies, which were located near the midline of the filament and were not evenly spaced throughout the filament, as is found in cells treated with cephalexin. Finally, the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-RarA fusion protein was used to localize the replication complex in individual E. coli cells. Novobiocin and nalidixic acid treatment both resulted in rapid loss of RarA foci. Under these conditions the RK2 plasmid clusters were not disassembled, suggesting that a completely intact replication complex is not required for plasmid clustering.     

Partition of P1 plasmids in Escherichia coli mukB chromosomal partition mutants.

The partition system of the low-copy-number plasmid/prophage of bacteriophage P1 encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, and contains a DNA site called parS. ParB and the Escherichia coli protein IHF bind to parS to form the partition complex, in which parS is wrapped around ParB and IHF in a precise three-dimensional conformation. Partition can be thought of as a positioning reaction; the plasmid-encoded components ensure that at least one copy of the plasmid is positioned within each new daughter cell. We have used an E. coli chromosomal partition mutant to test whether this positioning is mediated by direct plasmid-chromosomal attachment, for example, by pairing of the partition complex that forms at parS with a bacterial attachment site. The E. coli MukB protein is required for proper chromosomal positioning, so that mukB mutants generate some cells without chromosomes (anucleate cells) at each cell division. We analyzed the plasmid distribution in nucleate and anucleate mukB cells. We found that P1 plasmids are stable in mukB mutants and that they partition into both nucleate and anucleate cells. This indicates that the P1 partition complex is not used to pair plasmids with the host chromosome and that P1 plasmids must be responsible for their own proper cellular localization, presumably through host-plasmid protein-protein interactions.     

Effects of the P1 plasmid centromere on expression of P1 partition genes

The partition operon of P1 plasmid encodes two proteins, ParA and ParB, required for the faithful segregation of plasmid copies to daughter cells. The operon is followed by a centromere analog, parS, at which ParB binds. ParA, a weak ATPase, represses the par promoter most effectively in its ADP-bound form. ParB can recruit ParA to parS, stimulate its ATPase, and significantly stimulate the repression. We report here that parS also participates in the regulation of expression of the par genes. A single chromosomal parS was shown to augment repression of several copies of the par promoter by severalfold. The repression increase was sensitive to the levels of ParA and ParB and to their ratio. The increase may be attributable to a conformational change in ParA mediated by the parS-ParB complex, possibly acting catalytically. We also observed an in cis effect of parS which enhanced expression of parB, presumably due to a selective modulation of the mRNA level. Although ParB had been earlier found to spread into and silence genes flanking parS, silencing of the par operon by ParB spreading was not significant. Based upon analogies between partitioning and septum placement, we speculate that the regulatory switch controlled by the parS-ParB complex might be essential for partitioning itself.     

A family of ATPases involved in active partitioning of diverse bacterial plasmids

Low copy-number bacterial plasmids F (the classical Escherichia coli sex factor) and prophage P1 encode partitioning functions which may provide fundamental insights into the active processes which ensure that bacterial genomes are segregated to both daughter cells prior to cell division. These partitioning systems involve two proteins: ParA and ParB. We report that incC from the broad host-range plasmid RK2 is a member of the family of ParA partitioning proteins and that these proteins (as well as related proteins encoded by plasmids from Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Chlamydia trachomatis) contain type I nucleotide-binding motifs. Also, we show that the cell division inhibitor MinD is homologous to members of the ParA family. Sequence comparisons of ParB proteins suggest that they may contain sites for phosphorylation. We propose that ATP hydrolysis by the ParA protein may result in phosphorylation of the ParB protein, thereby causing a conformational shift necessary to separate paired plasmid molecules at the cell division plane.     

ParA ATPases can move and position DNA and subcellular structures

Prokaryotic chromosomes and plasmids can be actively segregated by partitioning (par) loci. The common ParA-encoding par loci segregate plasmids by arranging them in regular arrays over the nucleoid by an unknown mechanism. Recent observations indicate that ParA moves plasmids and chromosomes by a pulling mechanism. Even though ParAs form filaments in vitro it is not known whether similar structures are present in vivo. ParA of P1 forms filaments in vitro at very high concentrations only and filament-like structures have not been observed in vivo. Consequently, a 'diffusion-ratchet' mechanism was suggested to explain plasmid movement by ParA of P1. We compare this mechanism with our previously proposed filament model for plasmid movement by ParA. Remarkably, ParA homologues have been discovered to arrange subcellular structures such as carboxysomes and chemotaxis sensory receptors in a regular manner very similar to those of the plasmid arrays.