Association between the TP53 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The previous published data on the association between TP53 codon 72, intron 6, and intron 3 16 bp polymorphisms and lung cancer risk remained controversial. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. 38 publications with 51 studies were selected for this meta-analysis, including 17,337 cases and 16,127 controls for TP53 codon 72 (from 43 studies), 2,201 cases and 2,399 controls for TP53 intron 6 (from four studies), and 4,322 cases and 4,558 controls for TP53 intron 3 16 bp (from four studies). When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of codon 72 polymorphism, there was significant association between lung cancer risk and codon 72 polymorphism in any genetic model (dominant model: OR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.05–1.21; recessive model: OR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.02–1.27; additive model: OR = 1.19, 95 % CI 1.05–1.33). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, histological type, source of control, and smoking status, significantly increased risks were observed in subgroups such as Asians, Caucasians, lung squamous cell carcinoma patients for Asians, population-based study, hospital-based study, non-smokers, and smokers. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of intron 6 polymorphism, there was significant association between lung cancer risk and intron 6 polymorphism in dominant model (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.11–1.44). When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of intron 3 16 bp polymorphism, there was significant association between lung cancer risk and intron 3 16 bp polymorphism in dominant model (OR = 1.12, 95 % CI 1.02–1.23) and additive model (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.04–1.90). Additionally, when one study was deleted in the sensitive analysis, the results of TP53 intron 3 16 bp duplication polymorphism were changed in the dominant model (OR = 1.11, 95 % CI 0.87–1.42) and additive model (OR = 1.01, 95 % CI 0.65–1.56). In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that codon 72 and intron 6 polymorphisms show an increased lung cancer risk. A study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluated gene-environment interaction on TP53 codon 72, intron 6, and intron 3 16 bp polymorphisms and lung cancer risk.     

Aberrant promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene may be correlated with colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the potential role of RASSF1A promoter methylation in colorectal carcinogenesis. A range of electronic databases were searched: PubMed (1966–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013), Web of Science (1945–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982–2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated. Eleven clinical cohort studies with a total of 1,505 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that met all inclusion criteria were included in our meta-analysis. The results of our meta-analysis revealed that the frequency of RASSF1A promoter methylation was strongly correlated with clinical stage (OR = 1.69, 95 % CI 1.16–2.44, P = 0.006), histological grade (OR = 1.92, 95 % CI 1.22–3.04, P = 0.005) and distant metastasis (OR = 2.59, 95 % CI 1.46–4.60, P = 0.037) of CRC patients. However, we observed no positive correlations of RASSF1A promoter methylation with gender (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI 0.74–1.46, P = 0.842), age (OR = 1.70, 95 % CI 0.98–2.93, P = 0.057) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.65, 95 % CI 0.87–3.14, P = 0.127) of CRC patients. Further subgroup analysis by ethnicity demonstrated that RASSF1A promoter methylation was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients among Asians (clinical stage: OR = 2.55, 95 % CI 1.55–4.20, P < 0.001; histological grade: OR = 2.70, 95 % CI 1.44–5.06, P = 0.002; lymph node metastasis: OR = 4.09, 95 % CI 1.49–11.26, P = 0.006; distant metastasis: OR = 5.38, 95 % CI 1.73–16.70, P = 0.004), but not among Caucasians and Africans (all P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis has shown positive correlations between aberrant promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients, especially among Asians.     

Relationship between serum levels of insulin-like growth factors and subsequent risk of cancer mortality: Findings from a nested case–control study within the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study

Background: We investigated the association between serum levels of IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 and the subsequent risk of cancer mortality. Methods: Our case–control study examined samples from 914 cancer deaths and their 2739 matched controls within the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Blood samples were obtained at the baseline and stored at ?80 °C until analysis for IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 levels. The conditional logistic model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for cancer mortality associated with these serum levels. Results: The adjusted ORs for IGF-I quartiles ranged from 0.81 to 0.96 but were not significant. The adjusted ORs and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the second, third, and fourth IGF-II quartiles were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52–0.79), 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58–0.88), and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59–0.91), respectively, while those for the respective IGFBP-3 quartiles were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.96), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60–0.94), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56–0.90). In the model of IGF-I, and IGF-II additionally adjusted for IGFBP-3, the associations of high IGFs levels were similar as observed in the above models, while the association of IGFBP-3 shifted into non-significance after adjusting for IGF-II. Conclusion: An increased level of IGF-II was significantly associated with decreased risk of cancer mortality, whereas the association between IGF-I and all cancer mortality was not significant. The inverse association of IGFBP-3 level with all cancer mortality was affected when adjusting for IGF-II levels, shifting from significant to non-significant. Confirmation of these results from further cohort studies may aid in identifying the potential association between these molecules and the risk of cancer among the general Japanese population.     

Association between the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. However, the results of these studies remained controversial. We aimed to examine the associations by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 11 studies including 5,093 cases and 5,941 controls evaluated the association between the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. No significantly associations were found in all genetic models (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.14, 95 % CI = 0.93–1.40; AC vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.91–1.20; dominant model: OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.95–1.24; recessive model: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.95–1.28). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or source of controls, there were still no significant associations detected in all genetic models. This meta-analysis suggested the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism was not a risk factor for increasing colorectal cancer, further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.     

A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer

Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is one of the important mutant sites for the cancer risk at present. The conclusions of the published reports on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer are still debated. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between GSTP1 and the risk of breast cancer. The association reports were identified from PubMed and Cochrane Library, and eligible studies were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 35 investigations were included into this meta-analysis for the association of GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, consisting of 40,347 subjects (18,665 patients with breast cancer and 21,682 controls). The association between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk was not found for overall population, Caucasians and Africans. Interestingly, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer in Asians (G allele: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.04–1.17, P = 0.001; GG genotype: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.62, P = 0.0008; AA genotype: OR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.85–0.98, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer for the analysis of the controls from hospital. In conclusion, GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism is associated with the breast cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, more studies on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer should be performed in further.     

The Cdx-2 polymorphism in the VDR gene is associated with increased risk of cancer: a meta-analysis

The Cdx-2 polymorphism in VDR gene has been extensively investigated for association with cancer risk, however, results of different studies have been inconsistent. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship of the Cdx-2 polymorphism in VDR and cancer risk by meta-analysis. All eligible case–control studies were searched in Pubmed, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases. Odds ratios (OR) with the 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the association. A total of 12,906 cases and 13,700 controls in 18 case–control studies were included. The results indicated that the AA homozygote carriers had a 16 % increased risk of cancer, when compared with the homozygote GG and heterozygote AG (OR = 1.16, 95 % CI 1.05–1.29 for AA vs. GG+AG). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant elevated risks were associated with AA homozygote carriers in Caucasians (OR = 1.16, 95 % CI 1.01–1.33, and P = 0.04) and African Americans (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.07–1.61, and P = 0.01). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, the polymorphism was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.23, 95 % CI 1.04–1.46, and P = 0.02). This meta-analysis suggested that the Cdx-2 polymorphism of VDR gene would be a risk factor for cancer. To further evaluate gene-to-gene and gene-to-environmental interactions between polymorphisms of VDR gene and cancer risk, more studies with large groups of patients are required.     

Significant association of glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype with esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Recent studies on the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer showed inconclusive results. To clarify this possible association, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies. Data were collected from the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to assess the strength of this association. We summarized the data on the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of esophageal cancer in the overall population, and performed subgroup analyses by ethnicity. Finally, a total of 24 independent studies including a total of 7,801 subjects (2,965 cases and 4,836 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, there was no significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and esophageal cancer risk (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 0.99–1.33, P = 0.067). However, meta-analysis of adjusted ORs showed a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.08–1.56, P = 0.005). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed there was an obvious association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer in East Asians (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10–1.39, P < 0.001), but not in Caucasians (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI 0.71–1.11, P = 0.300). There was no obvious risk of publication bias in this meta-analysis (Egger’s test, P = 0.784). This meta-analysis demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is independently associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, and a race-specific effect may exist in this association.     

Genetic polymorphisms in VDR,ESR1 and ESR2 genes may contribute to susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis

We conducted this meta-analysis of relevant case–control studies to investigate the relationships between genetic polymorphisms in VDR, ESR1 and ESR2 genes to the susceptibility of Parkinson’s disease (PD). A search on electronic databases without any language restrictions was conducted: MEDLINE (1966–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013), Web of Science (1945–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (1982–2013). Meta-analysis was performed using the STATA statistical software. Crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was calculated. Fourteen case–control studies with a total of 3,689 PD patients and 4,627 healthy subjects were included in our meta-analysis. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrated that the VDR genetic polymorphisms might be closely related to increased risks of PD (allele model: OR = 1.18, 95 % CI 1.09–1.29, P < 0.001; dominant model: OR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.16–1.63, P < 0.001; respectively), especially for the polymorphisms rs7976091 and rs10735810. Our findings also illustrated that ESR1 genetic polymorphisms might increase the risk of PD (allele model: OR = 1.56, 95 % CI 1.17–2.07, P = 0.002; recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.33–2.80, P < 0.001; homozygous model: OR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.02–1.79, P = 0.038; heterozygous model: OR = 2.04, 95 % CI 1.36–3.07, P = 0.001; respectively), especially for the polymorphisms rs2234693 and rs9340799. Furthermore, we found significant correlations of ESR2 genetic polymorphisms with the risk of PD (allele model: OR = 1.78, 95 % CI 1.19–2.67, P = 0.005; recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.15–3.27, P = 0.014; homozygous model: OR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.09–2.89, P = 0.022; heterozygous model: OR = 1.88, 95 % CI 1.08–3.27, P = 0.025; respectively), especially for the rs1256049 polymorphism. Our meta-analysis suggests that genetic polymorphisms in VDR, ESR1 and ESR2 genes may contribute to increased risks for PD.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and risk of glioma: a meta-analysis

The relationship between genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase (GST) and the development of glioma has been investigated in several epidemiologic studies. However these studies report inconsistent results. In order to quantitatively summarise the evidence for such a relationship, a meta-analysis is conducted. The PubMed database was searched from inception to January 2012 to identify relevant studies that met pre-stated inclusion criteria. We also reviewed reference lists from retrieved articles. Two researchers evaluated study eligibility and extracted the data independently, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the risk of glioma associated with GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 I105V or GSTP1 A114V. This meta-analysis included 11 case–control studies, which included 2,404 glioma cases and 6,379 controls. The combined results based on all studies showed that there was no association between any of the GST variants and the risk of glioma (for GSTM1: pooled OR = 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.92–1.15; for GSTT1: pooled OR = 1.12; 95 % CI, 0.90–1.40; for GSTP1 I105V: pooled OR = 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.64–1.31 and for GSTP1 A114V: pooled OR = 1.14; 95 % CI, 0.97–1.34). Subgroup analyses showed that GSTP1 A114V genotype was associated with an increased risk of other histopathologic glioma except glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (pooled OR = 1.30; 95 % CI = 1.06–1.60); no relationship was found between other GST variants and histopathologic groups. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests no association between GST variants and the risk of glioma. However, the significant risk elevation is present between GSTP1 A114V genotype and other histopathologic glioma except GBM.     

Effects of common polymorphisms rs2910164 in miR-146a and rs3746444 in miR-499 on cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of new non-coding RNA, which may play a more important role in the pathogenesis of human cancers. Rs2910164 in miR-146a and rs3746444 in miR-499 are shown to be associated with increased/decreased cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically summarize the possible association. We retrieved the relevant articles from PubMed databases. Studies were selected using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated to access the strength of association between microRNA polymorphism and cancer risk. All analyses were performed using the Stata software. Twenty-nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were not significant associations between miR-146a rs2910164 and miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphisms with overall cancer risk. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly affected cancer risks were found among Asians for both rs2910164 (GC vs. GG: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82–0.96; CC vs. GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.97; GC + CC vs. GG: OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.76–0.97; C vs. G: OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.82–1.00) and rs3746444 (GG + AG vs. AA: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.00–1.46). In the tumor type subgroup analysis, rs2910164 C allele decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (C vs. G: OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80–1.00) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (C vs. G: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.62–0.84). The rs2910164 in miR-146a and the rs3746444 in miR-499 are likely to be associated with cancer risk.     

MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and inflammatory bowel disease risk: a meta-analysis

The C3435T polymorphism of the multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) has been implicated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) risk, but the reported results are inconsistent. Here we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between C3435T polymorphism and the risk of IBD using all case–control studies published before February 2013 according to PubMed and Web of Science. A total of 13 case–control studies, including 6,757 cases and 4,295 controls, were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Overall, no evidence has indicated that the C3435T polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility to IBD (dominant model: OR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 0.96–1.16; CT vs. CC: OR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.95–1.17; TT vs. CC: OR = 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.92–1.17; recessive model: OR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.90–1.09). Besides, stratified analysis by clinical type also indicated that no significant association between MDR1 C3435T and the risk of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis was observed. This meta-analysis indicated that the C3435T polymorphism of MDR1 may not confer susceptibility to IBD.     

IGF1(CA)19 and IGFBP-3-202A/C Gene Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis

Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1)(CA)19 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3)-202A/C gene polymorphisms had been focused by many epidemiological studies recently, which were associated with common cancer risk including colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer. However, the findings of epidemiological investigations are not coincident. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies, including studies nested in cohorts, of the association between IGF1(CA)19 and IGFBP-3-202A/C gene polymorphism and prostate, colorectal, premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer. We identified 17 eligible studies (24 datasets), which included 9,744 cases and 11,332 controls. The result displays that individuals carrying (CA)19 allele had a subtly decreased risk of all cancer sites [OR(95 % CI) 0.92(0.87,0.97); 0.882(0.809,0.962); 0.902(0.849,0.958)] and postmenopausal breast cancer [OR(95 % CI) 0.893(0.832,0.959); 0.834(0.719,0.968); 0.862(0.776,0.958)] in allele contrast model, CA19/CA19 vs. non-CA19/non-CA19 model, and recessive genetic model. In subgroup analysis according to ethnicities, (CA)19 repeat polymorphism had an increased risk of common cancers in Asian [OR (95 % CI) of allele contrast model: 1.105(1.000,1.224); additive model: 1.103(0.844,1.441), 1.197(1.013,1.413); recessive model: 1.039(0.831,1.300); and dominant model: 1.191(1.030,1.376)]. On the other hand, IGFBP-3-202A/C gene polymorphism did not seem to be associated with all the cancer sites in any genetic model and ethnicity. In conclusion, the result of this meta-analysis indicates that the IGF1(CA)19 polymorphism is a candidate gene polymorphism for cancer susceptibility regardless of environmental factors, especially in Asian.     

The genetic polymorphisms of intercellular cell adhesion molecules and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Intercellular cell adhesion molecules (ICAMs) genetic polymorphisms have been considered to be implicated in the development of breast cancer. However, the previous reports are conflicting. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between three polymorphisms, including ICAM1 K469E, ICAM5 V301I, ICAM5 rs281439, and breast cancer risk. The meta-analyses are based on a literature search of PubMed, CNKI and VIP database up until August 2011. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was calculated using review manager 5.0.25 package. In total, five populations (2,020 cases and 2,012 controls) on ICAM1 K469E polymorphism, four populations (1,797 cases and 2,244 controls) on ICAM5 V301I polymorphism and five populations (2,744 cases and 3,006 controls) on ICAM5 rs281439 variant were included. Overall, the meta-analysis showed no significant association between ICAM1 K469E polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, a significant association was observed for ICAM5 V301I polymorphism (VV vs. II: OR = 1.48, 95 % CI 1.04–2.13, P = 0.03; VV/VI vs. II: OR = 1.25, 95 % CI 1.05–1.48, P = 0.01). In addition, there was a significant association between ICAM5 rs281439 variant and breast cancer risk (GG vs. CC: OR = 1.31, 95 % CI 1.03–1.65, P = 0.03). Our meta-analysis suggests that the ICAM5 V301I and rs281439 variants but not ICAM1 K469E polymorphism may contribute to the susceptibility of breast cancer. Given the limited sample sizes, further investigation is needed.     

Quantitative analysis of the association between interleukin-10 1082A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to sepsis

There are some epidemiological studies investigating the association between interleukin-10 (IL-10) 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility reporting conflicting findings. Our work tried to further quantitatively assess the association of the IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism with sepsis susceptibility through a systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of eleven studies with 2,528 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated with random-effects model or fixed-effects model based on the heterogeneity among the included studies. Meta-analysis of all 11 studies showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10 1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility under the allele comparison model (G vs A) and the codominant model (GG vs AA) (for G vs A: OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.72–0.96, P = 0.011; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.47–0.96, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that there was an obvious association between IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism and sepsis susceptibility in Asians under three comparison models (for G vs A: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.62–0.91, P = 0.004; for GG vs AA: OR = 0.39, 95 % CI 0.21–0.73, P = 0.003; for GG vs AA/AG: OR = 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14–0.92, P = 0.032), but there was no similar association in Caucasians under all four comparison models. Our meta-analysis reveals that the IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism has an association with the susceptibility to sepsis in Asian populations. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of IL-10-1082A/G polymorphism on sepsis susceptibility in Caucasians.     

The association between the Lys751Gln polymorphism in the XPD gene and the risk of bladder cancer

The Lys751Gln polymorphism in the XPD gene have been suggested as a risk factor for bladder cancer, however the results were inconclusive. The aim of the current study is to assess the association by meta-analysis. A total of 15 case–control studies concerning the association between the XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and bladder cancer risk were included in the meta-analysis. The results suggested that the Lys751Gln polymorphism was not associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer in the dominant model (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI 0.95–1.11, P = 0.53 for Lys/Gln+Gln/Gln vs. Lys/Lys) in overall analysis. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association was found in Caucasians or Asians. Other comparatives suggested a slight significant association between the polymorphism with the risk of bladder cancer in the recessive comparative (OR = 1.14, 95 % CI 1.02–1.29, P = 0.03). The current meta-analysis indicated that the Lys751Gln polymorphism in the XPD gene might be a risk factor for bladder cancer. In the future, more large-scale case–control studies are needed to validate our results.     

Association Between a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the TP53 Region and Risk of Ovarian Cancer

TP53 is known as a tumor suppressor gene involved in cell cycle regulation. Many previous epidemiological and clinical studies have evaluated the effects of rs1042522 polymorphism on risk of ovarian cancer. But the results are conflicting and heterogeneous. The primary objective of this study was to examine whether rs1042522 polymorphism is associated with ovarian cancer risk. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of 19 case–control studies that analyzed rs1042522 polymorphism in ovarian cancer risk. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using distinct genetic models. Heterogeneity between studies was detected by the χ²-based Q test. Additional analyses such as sensitivity analyses and publication bias were also performed. The rs1042522 polymorphism was not overall associated with ovarian cancer risk. But there was a borderline association in the heterozygote model (OR = 1.09, 95 % CI 0.99–1.21). Similar effects were observed in the subgroup of Caucasian population (the heterozygote model: OR = 1.11, 95 % CI 1.00–1.24). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were revealed in this meta-analysis. This study provides statistical evidence that TP53 rs1042522 polymorphism may play a role in modulating risk of ovarian cancer. This observation requires further analysis of a larger study size.     

Relationships between PON1 Q192R polymorphism and clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationships between the PON1 Q192R (rs662 T>C) polymorphism and the clinical outcome of antiplatelet treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A range of electronic databases were searched: Web of Science (1945–2013), the Cochrane Library Database (Issue 12, 2013), PubMed (1966–2013), EMBASE (1980–2013), CINAHL (1982–2013) and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1982–2013) without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. The crude odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Six clinical cohort studies with a total number of 5,189 patients undergoing PCI for coronary heart disease were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism was correlated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04–1.43, P = 0.014; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.38, 95 % CI 1.03–1.86, P = 0.029; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.05–1.99, P = 0.024; respectively), especially among Asians. Furthermore, we found significantly positive correlations between the PON1 Q192R polymorphism and the incidence of stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI (C allele vs. T allele: OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.08–1.87, P = 0.011; CT+CC vs. TT: OR = 1.93, 95 % CI 1.01–3.67, P = 0.046; CC vs. TT: OR = 2.18, 95 % CI 1.09–4.35, P = 0.027; respectively). Our meta-analysis of clinical cohort studies provides evidence that the PON1 Q192R polymorphism may increase the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in patients receiving antiplatelet treatment after PCI.     

XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism contributes to increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population

Previous studies investigating the association between X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese provided inconsistent findings. To assess the association in Chinese population, a meta-analysis was performed. Eligible studies were searched in Pubmed, Emabse, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Odds ratios (OR) with the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were pooled to assess the association. Seven case–control studies involving a total of 2136 colorectal cancer cases and 3168 controls were finally included in the meta-analysis. Our analysis suggested that the variant genotypes of XRCC1 Arg399Gln were associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population (Gln vs. Arg: random effect model OR = 1.24, 95 %CI = 1.01–1.52, P = 0.041; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: random effect model OR = 1.52, 95 %CI = 1.07–2.15, P = 0.019; and Recessive model: fixed effect model OR = 1.37, 95 %CI = 1.12–1.67, P = 0.002). There was low risk of publication bias in present meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis provides an evidence for the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population, and XRCC1 Arg399Gln variant genotypes contribute to increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese.     

The l58Val/Met polymorphism of catechol-O-methyl transferase gene and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer has been evaluated. However, the results of these studies on the association remain conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the eligible studies of COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer risk. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for COMT Val158Met polymorphism and prostate cancer were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the software program Review Manage (Version 5.0) and Stata (Version 12.0). Six case–control studies, totally 4,118 persons including 2,143 cases and 1,975 controls, met the included criteria and thus were selected. Our analysis suggested that Val158Met polymorphism was associated with prostate cancer risk in overall population. Collectively, the results of the present study suggest that significant associations of COMT Val158Met polymorphisms with prostate cancer were observed (for additive model: OR = 1.068, 95 % CI = 1.002–1.138, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.363, P = 0.043; for dominant model: OR = 1.266, 95 % CI = 1.057–1.517, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.000, P = 0.011; for recessive model: OR = 1.050, 95 % CI = 0.961–1.146, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.558, P = 0.279; and Val allele versus Met allele OR = 0.932, 95 % CI = 0.894–0.971, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.272, P = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, we detected no significant association between the COMT 158 Val/Met genotype and prostate cancer risk in Caucasian and Asian populations, while the contrary result for additive model (OR = 2.43, 95 % CI = 1.08–5.43, P _{heterogeneity} = 0.04, P = 0.03) in Asian populations. The result of this meta-analysis suggests that COMT l58Val/Met polymorphism might be contributed to the overall prostate cancer risk.     

A meta-analysis of the relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer including 31802 subjects

The relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer from the published reports are still conflicting. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between GSTT1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer using meta-analysis method. The association studies were identified from PubMed, and Cochrane Library on July 1, 2012, and eligible investigations were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 51 reports were recruited into this meta-analysis for the association of null genotype of GSTT1 with lung cancer susceptibility, consisting of 15,140 patients with lung cancer and 16,662 controls. There was a marked association between GSTT1 null genotype and lung cancer risk in overall populations (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.04–1.27, P = 0.007). Furthermore, GSTT1 null genotype was associated with the lung cancer risk in Asians (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI 1.23–1.76, P < 0.0001). However, GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with the risk of lung cancer in Caucasians, Brazilian population and Africans. In conclusion, GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the lung cancer in overall populations and in Asians.