The development of the Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR) in Eigenmannia: An innate behavior indeed

Summary In its Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR), the gymnotiform electric fish Eigenmannia shifts its electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from similar interfering frequencies. Continual behavioral measurements were carried out in 164 juvenile fish until a correct JAR emerged. Sixty-four of these fish were raised in complete isolation, the remainder in a community of their siblings. A correct JAR emerged in fish of 1.2–1.6 cm in body length, corresponding to a developmental age of 24–32 days. In 6 of 164 fish, the emergence of a correct JAR followed an interim appearance of an incorrect JAR, which involved frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. The fish raised in isolation developed the same forms of behavior and showed the same sequence in their appearance as did socially raised fish. This indicates that the JAR and its developmental schedule are innate. The appearance of an incorrect JAR suggests initial errors or incompleteness in the wiring of central nervous connections. A correct JAR ultimately emerged even if a stimulus regimen was offered that rewarded frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. This indicates that the development of the JAR is immune to experimental alterations of sensory experience.Abbreviations Df frequency difference between a jamming stimulus and fish's EOD - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EO electric organ - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR Jamming Avoidance Response - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nE subnucleus of nE, causing drop of EOD frequency - nE subnucleus of nE, causing rise of EOD frequency - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus     

The jamming avoidance response ofEigenmannia: properties of a diencephalic link between sensory processing and motor output

Summary Brain regions participating in the control ofEigenmannia's electric organ discharge frequency were localized by electrical microstimulation and anatomically identified by means of horseradish peroxidase deposition. A diencephalic region was found which, when stimulated, caused electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency increases of similar magnitude and time course as the frequency increases seen during the jamming avoidance response. Single unit recordings from this region revealed one cell type which preferentially responded to stimuli that cause the acceleration phase of the jamming avoidance response (electric organ discharge frequency increase). A second cell type responded preferentially to stimuli which cause EOD frequency decrease, and both cell types were tuned to stimuli which evoked maximal jamming avoidance behaviors.The results of the horseradish peroxidase experiments showed that the recording and stimulation sites correspond to the previously described nucleus electrosensorius. Our results confirm the earlier finding that this nucleus receives output from the torus semicircularis and we also found that the N. electrosensorius projects to the mesencephalic prepacemaker nucleus. The prepacemaker projects to the medullary pacemaker nucleus which generates the commands that evoke electric organ discharges.The anatomical and physiological results described here establish this diencephalic region as a link between the major sensory processing region for the jamming avoidance response, the torus semicircularis, and a mesencephalic pre-motor region, the prepacemaker nucleus.Abbreviations AM amplitude modulation - DF Delta F - ELLL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - NE nucleus electrosensorius - PPN prepacemaker nucleus - PN pacemaker nucleus     

The coding of signals in the electric communication of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: From electroreceptors to neurons in the torus semicircularis of the midbrain

Summary In the context of aggression and courtship, Eigenmannia repeatedly interrupts its electric organ discharges (EODs) These interruptions (Fig. 1) contain low-frequency components as well as high-frequency transients and, therefore, stimulate ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively (Figs. 2, 3). Information provided by these two classes of receptors is relayed along separate pathways, via the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) of the hindbrain, to the dorsal torus semicircularis (TSd) of the midbrain. Some neurons of the torus receive inputs from both types of receptors (Figs. 14, 15), and some respond predominantly to EOD interruptions while being rather insensitive to other forms of signal modulations (Figs. 12, 13). This high selectivity appears to result from convergence and gating of inputs from individually less selective neurons.Abbreviations CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DPn dorsal posterior nucleus (thalamus) - EOD electric organ discharge - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - JAR jamming avoidance response - LMR lateral mesencephalic reticular formation - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEb nucleus electrosensorius, beat-related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateralis area - NPd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TeO optic tectum - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechano-sensory and auditory) torus semicircularis     

Stimulus discrimination in the diencephalon ofEigenmannia: the emergence and sharpening of a sensory filter

Summary Neuronal reliability and sensitivity to behaviorally relevant stimulus patterns were investigated in a higher-order nucleus of the diencephalon believed to participate in the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish,Eigenmannia. The fish raises or lowers its frequency of electric organ discharge (EOD) to minimize interference from a neighboring fish's EOD. Proper JARs require determination of the sign of the difference frequency (Df) between the neighboring fish's EOD and the fish's own EOD. Bastian and Yuthas (1984) recently described diencephalic neurons within the nucleus electrosensorius that are able to make this determination. In the present study, response properties of such neurons were compared with those of lower-level sign-selective cells found in the torus semicircularis and the optic tectum (Heiligenberg and Rose 1985) as well as with properties of the intact behavior.Most sign-selective cells within the nucleus electrosensorius show a high degree of selectivity for one sign of the difference frequency; cells with either sign preference were found in approximately equal numbers. The sign preference and the degree of sign selectivity is most often independent of the spatial orientation of the jamming stimulus. In contrast, the responses of toral and tectal cells are less robust and consistent and are often highly dependent on the geometry of the jamming stimulus.Determination of the sign of the difference frequency requires the analysis of amplitude modulations coupled with modulations in phase (timing) differences between pairs of areas of the body surface. The most sensitive cells recorded in the nucleus electrosensorius can determine the sign of the difference frequency with timing differences of 1 s or less, roughly comparable to the behavioral threshold of 400 ns (Carr et al. 1986). The best toral/tectal response required at least a 16 s modulation.Cells within the nucleus electrosensorius thus code the sign of Df with a high degree of reliability and sensitivity. Ambiguities persist, however, which suggest that single cells at this level cannot completely account for the behavioral discrimination. Additional processing may be necessary to transform a still primarily sensory code into a motor program for control of the JAR (Rose et al. 1988).Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jammning avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and fish's own EOD - S ₁ sinusoidal EOD mimic of subject fish - S ₂ sinusoidal EOD mimic of neighbor     

Structure and function of neurons in the complex of the nucleus electrosensorius of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: Detection and processing of electric signals in social communication

Summary The complex of the diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) provides an interface between the electrosensory processing performed by the torus semicircularis and the control of specific behavioral responses. The rostral portion of the nE comprises two subdivisions that differ in the response properties and projection patterns of their neurons. First, the nEb (Fig. 1 B), which contains neurons that are driven almost exclusively by beat patterns generated by the interference of electric organ discharges (EODs) of similar frequencies. Second, the area medial to the nEb, comprising the lateral pretectum (PT) and the nE-acusticolateralis region (nEar, Fig. 1 B-D), which contains neurons excited predominantly by EOD interruptions, signals associated with aggression and courtship. Neurons in the second area commonly receive convergent inputs originating from ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, which respond to the low-frequency and high-frequency components of EOD interruptions, respectively. Projections of these neurons to hypothalamic areas linked to the pituitary may mediate modulations of a fish's endocrine state that are caused by exposure to EOD interruptions of its mate.Abbreviations a axon - ATh anterior thalamic nucleus - CCb corpus cerebelli - CE central nucleus of the inferior lobe - CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DFl nucleus diffusus lateralis of the inferior lobe - DFm nucleus diffusus medialis of the inferior lobe - DTn dorsal tegmental nucleus - EOD electric organ discharge - G glomerular nucleus - Hc caudal hypothalamus - Hd dorsal hypothalamus - Hl lateral hypothalamus - Hv ventral hypothalamus - JAR jamming avoidance response - LL lateral lemniscus - MGT magnocellular tegmental nucleus - MLF medial longitudinal fasciculus - nB nucleus at the base of the optic tract - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateral region - nEb nucleus electrosensorius-beat related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nLT nucleus tuberis lateralis - nLV nucleus lateralis valvulae - PC posterior commissure - Pd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PeG periglomerular complex - PG preglomerular nucleus - PLm medial division of the perilemniscal nucleus - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - PTh prethalamic nucleus - R red nucleus - Sc suprachiasmatic nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TAd nucleus tuberis anterior-dorsal subdivision - TAv nucleus tuberis anterior-ventral subdivision - TeO optic tectum - TL torus longitudinalis - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechanosensory and auditory) torus semicircularis - tTB tecto-bulbar tract - VCb cerebellar valvula - VP valvular peduncle - VPn nucleus of the valvular peduncle     

Individual prepacemaker neurons can modulate the pacemaker cycle of the gymnotiform electric fish,Eigenmannia

Summary The prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) in the midbrain of the gymnotiform electric fishEigenmannia provides the only known neuronal input to the medullary pacemaker nucleus, which triggers each electric organ discharge (EOD) cycle by a single command pulse. Electrical stimulation of the PPN elicited two distinct forms of modulations in the pacemaker activity, brief accelerations, hence referred to as chirps, and gradual frequency shifts with a time constant of approximately one second. The associated EOD modulations were indistinguishable from natural communication signals. Depending upon the site of stimulation, the two forms of modulation could be elicited alone or superimposed (Fig. 1). Stimulation sites eliciting only chirps could be separated from sites eliciting only gradual shifts by as little as 60 m. The magnitude of the elicited chirps depended upon the timing of the pulse stimulus with reference to the phase of the pacemaker cycle (Figs. 2, 3).Extracellular and intracellular recordings of single PPN neurons revealed that an action potential from a single neuron generates a chirp, and that the magnitude of the chirp depends upon the timing of the action potential with reference to the phase of the pacemaker cycle (Figs. 4, 5). The spike activity of these neurons had no relation to the jamming avoidance response (JAR), suggesting independent neuronal mechanisms for chirps and the JAR. Depolarization of such neurons by current injection produced bursts of chirps (Fig. 6), and intracellular injection of Lucifer Yellow identified these cells as a large type of PPN neuron which could also be retrogradely labeled from the pacemaker with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Fig. 7). We were unable to record from neurons linked to gradual shifts of the pacemaker frequency, although the JAR was elicited continually during the experiments. A smaller cell type of the PPN which can be retrogradely labeled with HRP but so far could not be recorded may control gradual frequency shifts.Abbreviations PPN prepacemaker nucleus - JAR jamming avoidance response - EOD electric organ discharge - Df neighbor's EOD frequency (or its mimic) minus animal's own EOD frequency (or its mimic)     

Species-specific differences in sensorimotor adaptation are correlated with differences in social structure

Here, we report a species difference in the strength and duration of long-term sensorimotor adaptation in the electromotor output of weakly electric fish. The adaptation is produced by changes in intrinsic excitability in the electromotor pacemaker nucleus; this change is a form of memory that correlates with social structure. A weakly electric fish may be jammed by a similar electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency of another fish and prevents jamming by transiently raising its own emission frequency, a behavior called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). The JAR requires activation of NMDA receptors, and prolonged JAR performance results in long-term frequency elevation (LTFE) of a fish’s EOD frequency for many hours after the jamming stimulus. We find that LTFE is stronger in a shoaling species (Eigenmannia virescens) with a higher probability of encountering jamming conspecifics, when compared to a solitary species (Apteronotus leptorhynchus). Additionally, LTFE persists in Eigenmannia, whereas, it decays over 5–9 h in Apteronotus.     

Testosterone modulates female chirping behavior in the weakly electric fish,Apteronotus leptorhynchus

The weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, produces a wave-like electric organ discharge (EOD) utilized for electrolocation and communication. Both sexes communicate by emitting chirps: transient increases in EOD frequency. In males, chirping behavior and the jamming avoidance response (JAR) can be evoked by an artificial EOD stimulus delivered to the water at frequencies 1–10 Hz below the animal's own EOD. In contrast, females rarely chirp in response to this stimulus even though they show consistent JARs. To investigate whether this behavioral difference is hormone dependent, we implanted females with testosterone (T) and monitored their chirping activity over a 5 week period. Our findings indicate that elevations in blood levels of T cause an enhancement of chirping behavior and a lowering of basal EOD frequency in females. Elevated blood levels of T also appear to modulate the quality of chirps produced by hormone treated females. The effects of T on female chirping behavior and basal EOD frequency appear specific, since the magnitude of the JAR was not affected by the hormonal treatment. These findings suggest that seasonal changes in circulating concentrations of T may regulate behavioral changes in female chirping behavior and basal EOD frequency.Abbreviations DHT dihydrotestosterone - E estradiol - EOD elecdric organ discharge - GSI gonadal size index - JAR jamming avoidance response - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - T testosterone     

Behavioral responses to jamming and ‘phantom’ jamming stimuli in the weakly electric fish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eigenmannia</Emphasis>

The jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia is characterized by upward or downward shifts in electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency that are elicited by particular combinations of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) and differential phase modulation (DPM). However, non-jamming stimuli that consist of AM and/or DPM can elicit similar shifts in EOD frequency. We tested the hypothesis that these behavioral responses result from non-jamming stimuli being misperceived as jamming stimuli. Responses to non-jamming stimuli were similar to JARs as measured by modulation rate tuning, sensitivity, and temporal dynamics. There was a smooth transition between the magnitude of JARs and responses to stimuli with variable depths of AM or DPM, suggesting that frequency shifts in response to jamming and non-jamming stimuli represent different points along a continuum rather than categorically distinct behaviors. We also tested the hypothesis that non-jamming stimuli can elicit frequency shifts in natural contexts. Frequency decreases could be elicited by semi-natural AM stimuli, such as random AM, AM presented to a localized portion of the body surface, transient changes in amplitude, and movement of resistive objects through the electric field. We conclude that ‘phantom’ jamming stimuli can induce EOD frequency shifts in natural situations.     

Gradual frequency rises in interacting black ghost knifefish,Apteronotus albifrons

The present paper highlights the relationship between social status and production of gradual frequency rises in interacting Apteronotus albifrons. The gradual frequency rise production was mathematically inferred and a discrete classification deliberately avoided. The results showed little gradual frequency rise production before the hierarchy settlement. Afterwards, only the dominant fish kept this gradual frequency rise production at low levels, while the subdominant fish drastically increased it in all following interaction contexts. The hypothesis of gradual frequency rises being involved in communication as submissive signals was thus strengthened.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - FM frequency modulation - GFR gradual frequency rise - IQR interquartile range - JAR jamming avoidance response     

‘Recognition units’ at the top of a neuronal hierarchy?

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, is able to discriminate the sign of the frequency difference, Df, between a neighbor's electric organ discharges (EODs) and its own. The fish lowers its EOD frequency for positive Dfs and raises its frequency for negative Dfs to minimize jamming of its electrolocation ability by a neighbor's EODs of similar frequency. This jamming avoidance response (JAR) is controlled by a group of 'sign-selective' neurons in the prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) that is located at the boundary of the midbrain and the diencephalon (Fig. 1). Extracellular recordings from a total of 35 neurons revealed a great similarity between behavioral and neuronal response properties: 1. All neurons fired vigorously for negative Dfs and were almost silent for positive Dfs, regardless of the orientation of the jamming stimulus, and thus discriminated the sign of Df unambiguously (Fig. 2). 2. In accordance with behavioral observations, individual neurons failed to discriminate the sign of Df when the jamming stimulus had the same field geometry as the signal mimicking the animal's own EOD (Fig. 3). 3. Df magnitudes which evoke strongest JARs, usually 4 to 8 Hz, also induced most vigorous responses in sign-selective neurons (Fig. 5). 4. Behavioral and neuronal thresholds for the detection of small jamming signals were similar. Threshold for sign selectivity was reached when the amplitude ratio of the jamming signal to the EOD mimic, measured near the head surface, was 0.001. This value corresponds to a maximal temporal disparity (a necessary cue for performing a correct JAR) of 1 to 2 microseconds for signals received by the two sides of the body in a transverse jamming field (Fig. 7). 5. The effects of two jamming fields, offered orthogonally to each other, may interact nonlinearly at the behavioral as well as at the neuronal level. A positive Df presented in one field may suppress behavioral and neuronal responses to modulations of the sign of Df in the other field (Fig. 8c).     

Sensory cues for the gradual frequency fall responses of the gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus

The sensory cues for a less known form of frequency shifting behavior, gradual frequency falls, of electric organ discharges (EODs) in a pulse-type gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus, were identified. We found that the gradual frequency fall occurs independently of more commonly observed momentary phase shifting behavior, and is due to perturbation of sensory feedback of the fish's own EODs by EODs of neighboring fish. The following components were identified as essential features in the signal mixture of the fish's own and the neighbor's EOD pulses: (1) the neighbor's pulses must be placed within a few millisecond of the fish's own pulses, (2) the neighbor's pulses, presented singly at low frequencies (0.2–4 Hz), were sufficient, (3) the frequency of individual pulse presentation must be below 4 Hz, (4) amplitude modulation of the sensory feedback of the fish's own pulses induced by such insertions of the neighbor's pulses must contain a high frequency component: sinusoidal amplitude modulation of the fish's own EOD feedback at these low frequencies does not induce gradual frequency falls. Differential stimulation across body surfaces, which is required for the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of wave-type gymnotiform electric fish, was not necessary for this behavior. We propose a cascade of high-pass and low-pass frequency filters within the amplitude processing pathway in the central nervous system as the mechanism of the gradual frequency fall response.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - f frequency of EOD or pacemaker command signal - JAR jamming avoidance response - S ₁ stimulus mimicking fish's own EOD - f ₁ frequency of S₁ - S ₂ stimulus mimicking neighbor's EOD - f ₂ frequency of S₂     

EOD modulations of brown ghost electric fish: JARs, chirps, rises, and dips.

Weakly electric "wave" fish make highly regular electric organ discharges (EODs) for precise electrolocation. Yet, they modulate the ongoing rhythmicity of their EOD during social interactions. These modulations may last from a few milliseconds to tens of minutes. In this paper we describe the different types of EOD modulations, what they may signal to recipient fish, and how they are generated on a neural level. Our main conclusions, based on a species called the brown ghost (Apteronotus leptorhynchus) are that fish: (1) show sexual dimorphism in the signals that they generate; (2) make different signals depending on Whether they are interacting with a fish of the opposite sex or, within their own sex, to a fish of that which is dominant or subordinate to it; (3) are able to assess relative dominance from electrical cues; (4) have a type of plasticity in the pacemaker nucleus, the control center for the EOD, that occurs after stimulation of NMDA receptors that causes a long-lasting (tens of minutes to hours) change in EOD frequency; (5) that this NMDA receptor-dependent change may occur in reflexive responses, like the jamming avoidance response (JAR), as well as after certain long-lasting social signals. We propose that NMDA-receptor dependent increases in EOD frequency during the JAR adaptively shift the EOD frequency to a new value to avoid jamming by another fish and that such increases in EOD frequency during social encounters may be advantageous since social dominance seems to be positively correlated with EOD frequency in both sexes.     

Single unit activity in the mesencephalon of Sternarchus

Action potentials evoked in a phase-locked 1 : 1 relationship by natural electric organ discharges (EOD) were recorded extracellularly and intracellularly from single mesencephalic magnocellular nucleus units in the high frequency electric fish Sternarchus albifrons (Gymnotidae). This activity has been shown to be the result of an extrinsic feedback of the electrosensory system and is probably important for the socalled jamming avoidance response triggered artificial electric pulses when delivered into the water in a 1 : 1 relationship at intensities higher than the EOD. In the same way, artificial pulses of frequency near EOD could either drive or, due to beats, greatly disturb the regular firing of the units. More insight into the neural mechanism was yielded by single EOD-triggered shocks provoking a failure in firing of certain action potentials of the series and causing long-lasting (10-20 ms) accelerations and decelerations of the regular EOD-evoked firing (transient disturbance). Intracellular stimulations show similar effects. The biological significance of this neural mechanism for the fish's electroperception and JAR is discussed.     

Neural coding of difference frequencies in the midbrain of the electric fishEigenmannia: Reading the sense of rotation in an amplitude-phase plane

Eigenmannia is able to discriminate the sign of the difference, Df, between the frequency of a neighbor's electric organ discharge (EOD) and that of its own EOD. This discrimination can be demonstrated at the level of individual neurons of the midbrain. Intracellular and extracellular recordings of such sign-selective cells revealed the following: Units preferring positive Dfs and units preferring negative Dfs were found with equal frequency. The degree of selectivity was also similar for these two classes of neurons. All sign-selective units were sensitive to the magnitude of the frequency difference, i.e. the beat rate. Most units responded best to beat rates in the 4-8 Hz range. Sign-selectivity was observed only when the jamming signal (S2) was presented through electrodes other than those used to deliver the mimic (S1) of the fish's EOD, i.e. only when amplitude modulations were accompanied by modulations of differential phase. Intracellular studies suggest that most sign-selective neurons of the tectum are large, multipolar cells in the stratum album centrale. These cells send projections to the reticular formation, to lamina 9 of the torus semicircularis and to the N. electrosensorius.     

An internal current source yields immunity of electrosensory information processing to unusually strong jamming in electric fish

Summary The electric organ of a fish represents an internal current source, and the largely isopotential nature of the body interior warrants that the current associated with the fish's electric organ discharges (EODs) recruits all electroreceptors on the fish's body surface evenly. Currents associated with the EODs of a neighbor, however, will not penetrate all portions of the fish's body surface equally and will barely affect regions where the neighbor's current flows tangentially to the skin surface. The computational mechanisms of the jamming avoidance response (JAR) in Eigenmannia exploit the uneven effects of a neighbor's EOD current to calculate the correct frequency difference between the two interfering EOD signals even if the amplitude of a neighbor's signal surpasses that of the fish's own signal by orders of magnitude. The particular geometry of the fish's own EOD current thus yields some immunity against the potentially confusing effects of unusually strong interfering EOD currents of neighbors.Abbreviations DF frequency difference - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response     

Motor control of the jamming avoidance response of Apteronotus leptorhynchus: evolutionary changes of a behavior and its neuronal substrates

The two closely related gymnotiform fishes, Apteronotus and Eigenmannia, share many similar communication and electrolocation behaviors that require modulation of the frequency of their electric organ discharges. The premotor linkages between their electrosensory system and their medullary pacemaker nucleus, which controls the repetition rate of their electric organ discharges, appear to function differently, however. In the context of the jamming avoidance response, Eigenmannia can raise or lower its electric organ discharge frequency from its resting level. A normally quiescent input from the diencephalic prepacemaker nucleus can be recruited to raise the electric organ discharge frequency above the resting level. Another normally active input, from the sublemniscal prepacemaker nucleus, can be inhibited to lower the electric organ discharge frequency below the resting level (Metzner 1993). In contrast, during a jamming avoidance response, Apteronotus cannot lower its electric organ discharge frequency below the resting level. The sublemniscal prepacemaker is normally completely inhibited and release of this inhibition allows the electric organ discharge frequency to rise during the jamming avoidance response. Further inhibition of this nucleus cannot lower the electric organ discharge frequency below the resting level. Lesions of the diencephalic prepacemaker do not affect performance of the jamming avoidance response. Thus, in Apteronotus, the sublemniscal prepacemaker alone controls the change of the electric organ discharge frequency during the jamming avoidance response.     

From oscillators to modulators: behavioral and neural control of modulations of the electric organ discharge in the gymnotiform fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus.

The brown ghost (Apteronotus leptorhynchus) is a weakly electric gymnotiform fish that produces wave-like electric organ discharges distinguished by their enormous degree of regularity. Transient modulations of these discharges occur both spontaneously and when stimulating the fish with external electric signals that mimic encounters with a neighboring fish. Two prominent forms of modulations are chirps and gradual frequency rises. Chirps are complex frequency and amplitude modulations lasting between 20 ms and more than 200 ms. Based on their biophysical characteristics, they can be divided into four distinct categories. Gradual frequency rises consist of a rise in discharge frequency, followed by a slow return to baseline frequency. Although the modulatory phase may vary considerably between a few 100 ms and almost 100 s, there is no evidence for the existence of distinct categories of this type of modulation signal. Stimulation of the fish with external electric signals results almost exclusively in the generation of type-2 chirps. This effect is independent of the chirp type generated by the respective individual under non-evoked conditions. By contrast, no proper stimulation condition is known to evoke the other three types of chirps or gradual frequency rises in non-breeding fish. In contrast to the type-2 chirps evoked when subjecting the fish to external electric stimulation, the rate of spontaneously produced chirps is quite low. However, their rate appears to be optimized according to the probability of encountering a conspecific. As a result, the rate of non-evoked chirping is increased during the night when the fish exhibit high locomotor activity and in the time period following external electric stimulation. These, as well as other, observations demonstrate that both the type and rate of modulatory behavior are affected by a variety of behavioral conditions. This diversity at the behavioral level correlates with, and is likely to be causally linked to, the diversity of inputs received by the neurons that control chirps and gradual frequency rises, respectively. These neurons form two distinct sub-nuclei within the central posterior/prepacemaker nucleus in the dorsal thalamus. In vitro tract-tracing experiments have elucidated some of the connections of this complex with other brain regions. Direct input is received from the optic tectum. Indirect input arising from telencephalic and hypothalamic regions, as well as from the preoptic area, is relayed to the central posterior/prepacemaker nucleus via the preglomerular nucleus. Feedback loops may be provided by projections of the central posterior/prepacemaker nucleus to the preglomerular nucleus and the nucleus preopticus periventricularis.     

Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the superimposed waveform. It was unclear whether or not the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold as behaviourally determined depends on the phase difference between a fish's own EOD and a sine-wave stimulus (at F = 0 Hz). Also the strength of the jamming avoidance response (JAR), a discharge frequency shift away from a stimulus that is sufficiently close to the EOD frequency, as a function of phase difference was studied. Sine-wave stimuli were both frequency-clamped and phase-locked to a fish's discharge frequency (F = 0 Hz). In food-rewarded fish, the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold depended significantly on the phase difference between a fish's discharge and the stimulus. Stimulus-intensity thresholds were low (down to 3 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the superimposed complex wave changed such that the shift in zero-crossings times relative to the original EOD was large but amplitude change minimal; stimulus-intensity thresholds were high (up to 16.9 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the shift in zero-crossings times was small but amplitude change maximal. Similar results were obtained for the non-conditioned JAR: at constant supra-threshold stimulus intensities and F = 0 Hz, the phase difference significantly affected the strength of the JAR, although variability between individuals was higher than that observed in the conditioned experiments.Abbreviations ACP active phase coupling - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - F frequency (fish) — frequency (stimulus) [Hz] - p-p peak-to-peak     

Distinct mechanisms of modulation in a neuronal oscillator generate different social signals in the electric fishHypopomus

Summary The medullary pacemaker nucleus of the gymnotiform electric fish,Hypopomus, is a relatively simple neuronal oscillator which contains pacemaker cells and relay cells. The pacemaker cells generate a regular discharge cycle and drive the relay cells which trigger pulse-like electric organ discharges (EODs). The diencephalic prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) projects to the pacemaker nucleus and modulates its activity to generate a variety of specific discharge patterns which serve as communicatory signals (Figs. 2 and 3).While inducing such signals by microiontophoresis of L-glutamate to the region of the PPN (Fig. 4) of curarized animals, we monitored the activity of neurons in the pacemaker nucleus intracellularly. We found that pacemaker cells and relay cells were affected differently in a manner specific to the type of EOD modulation (Figs. 5–10). The normal sequence of pacemaker cell and relay cell firing was maintained during gradual rises and falls in discharge rate. Both types of cells ceased to fire during interruptions following a decline in discharge rate. During sudden interruptions, however, relay cells were steadily depolarized, while pacemaker cells continued to fire regularly. Short and rapid barrages of EODs, called chirps, were generated through direct and synchronous activation of the relay cells whose action potentials invaded pacemaker cells antidromically and interfered with their otherwise regular firing pattern.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - HRP horseradish peroxidase - NMDA N-Methyl-D-Aspartate - PPN prepacemaker nucleus