2019冠状病毒病的发病机制研究进展

由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2)引起的病毒性肺炎已经扩散到全球200多个国家和地区,导致了数十万人死亡。2019冠状病毒病(coronavirus disease 19,COVID-19)的流行病学、致病机制和临床治疗方法成为各国政府以及科研界亟待研究解决的重大问题。本文对SARS-CoV-2的病原学特征及COVID-19的发病机制、病理学研究进展进行综述,重点评述病毒受体人血管紧张素转换酶Ⅱ (human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2,ACE2)与病毒致病机制的相关性,为后续研究与防治提供参考。     

严重急性呼吸综合征、中东呼吸综合征和2019冠状病毒病治疗研究进展

严重急性呼吸综合征2019(sever acute respiratory syndrome,SARS)、中东呼吸综合征(Middle East respiratory syndrome,MERS)和2019冠状病毒病(corona virus disease 2019,COVID-19)对全世界人民造成了严重的经济损...     

2019新型冠状病毒及其诊疗与防控:回顾与展望

2019新型冠状病毒的暴发持续至今,导致了世界各地数以百万计的感染个例,更夺去了数十万人的生命。世界卫生组织在2020年2月将此病毒引起的疾病定名为2019冠状病毒病(Coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19),而国际病毒分类委员会也将此病毒命名为SARS-Co V-2。COVID-19的典型临床症状类似感冒,少数病人可发展为重症甚至死亡。21世纪以来,人类冠状病毒有3次大暴发,分别是2003年暴发的严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)、2012年暴发的中东呼吸综合征(MERS)和本次的新型肺炎。自2003年以来,对SARS和MERS冠状病毒的研究从未间断,对其自然起源、致病机理、药物筛选及疫苗研发等已取得一定进展。鉴于SARS-Co V-2和SARS-Co V的基因组序列高度相似,以往对SARS-Co V的研究对深入探讨SARS-Co V-2生物学特性、诊断、治疗和防控有很强的借鉴性。文中通过回顾过往的研究进展,对比SARS-Co V和SARS-Co V-2的生物学特性,分析当前亟需的防控和诊疗措施,探讨疫苗研发所面对的一些难题,并展望疫情发展趋势及对本领域研究与开发的主要挑战,冀为我国和全世界有效控制COVID-19疫情提供参考。     

基于暴露分析与关键控制点方法对医院开展严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型检测的可行性研究

评估2019新型冠状病毒病暴发期间在医院开展严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2)核酸检测的可行性,为最终在医院开展核酸检测提供参考。熟悉暴露分析和关键点控制(exposure analysis and critical control points,EACCP)工作框架的专业人员在基于医院现实条件下,对SARS-CoV-2检测过程中可能的感染暴露风险和途径进行梳理,建立整个检测流程,验证在配备有发热门诊的医院开展的可行性,并明确降低暴露风险的关键控制点。高风险是在发热门诊标本的采集和灭活处理,中风险是未灭活标本的储运,低风险是灭活标本的储运和检测。优化检验流程能降低检测过程中感染暴露风险,对于高风险的操作,可在生物安全二级实验室(发热门诊或移动采集点等)和相应的安全防护等级下进行操作; EACCP分析方法可用于新发感染性疾病暴发期间的管理。     

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 Omicron变异株研究进展

世界卫生组织(World Health Organization, WHO)于2021年11月26日将首次在南非报告的新型冠状病毒 B．1.1.529 变异株列为受关注变种(variant of concern, VOC),并将其命名为奥密克戎(Omicron)。该变异株存在约50个突变,仅在刺突蛋白区域就有至少30个突变,远远超过其他流行株的突变位点数量。根据对突变位点的分析以及初步实验证实,该毒株可能具有极强的传染性以及免疫逃逸能力。Omicron变异株会怎样影响新冠疫情的走向引起了各国的广泛关注,本文将从Omicron变异株的基本特征、检测、致病性、传染性、免疫逃逸等方面进行综述。     

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型 IgM / IgG、病毒核酸和白细胞介素6的联合检测在2019冠状病毒病诊断和治疗中的价值

探讨严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2)免疫球蛋白M(Immunoglobulin M,IgM)/免疫球蛋白G(Immunoglobulin G,IgG)、病毒核酸和白细胞介素6(interleukin 6, IL-6)的联合检测在2019冠状病毒病(coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19)诊断和治疗中的临床价值。本研究按照《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第七版)》的标准收集了93例确诊病例(51例危重型、18例重型,15例轻型和9例普通型)和20例疑似病例(核酸检测阴性但临床症状和CT检测结果均符合标准)。选取110例儿科、妇科、肿瘤、血液和消化等疾病患者并排除COVID-19作为对照组。采用全自动化学发光免疫分析技术和电化学发光技术检测所有研究对象血清中SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG和IL-6。用实时荧光定量反转录聚合酶链反应对病例组和对照组的咽拭子进行SARS-CoV-2核酸检测。结果发现,血清IgM、IgG和IL-6在疑似病例中的阳性率分别为85%、75%和0%,在确诊病例中的阳性率分别为98.9%、95.7%和75.2%(其中危重型分别为100%、100%和100%,重型分别为94.4%、100%和97.9%,轻型分别为100%、93.3%和5%、普通型分别为100%、66.7%和0%)。IL-6和 SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG表达水平的改变与患者疾病的严重程度存在一定的关联性,差异有统计学意义(χ²＝273.51,χ²＝149.37;P＜0.05)。血清IL-6和SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG的联合检测可作为诊断和治疗COVID-19的监测指标,也可作为SARS-CoV-2核酸检测假阴性的有效互补。     

SARS-CoV-2抗原表位分析及相关疫苗研发的进展与挑战

疫苗的接种被认为是阻止时下2019冠状病毒病(Corona Virus Disease 2019,COVID-19)疫情进一步蔓延的最有效手段.目前,国内外多个研究团队采用了不同的技术路线开展严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2,S...     

冠状病毒相关研究工具进展

冠状病毒宿主范围广,可跨越动物宿主屏障感染人类,甚至造成人际传播。2019年12月新型冠状病毒(2019novel coronavirus,2019-nCoV)在中国武汉引发肺炎疫情,引起全世界的关注。截至2020年2月10日,中国实验室确诊病例40 235例,死亡909例,病死率2.3%;重症6 484例,重症率16.1%;全球已有25个国家和地区有确诊病例。至此,2019-nCoV成为继出现在中国内地的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus,SARS-CoV)、出现在中东沙特的中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus,MERS-CoV)之后,第三种可引起人类致死的冠状病毒。对于2019-nCoV的来源、中间宿主、传播方式、致病机制、防控措施等一系列问题,丞待科学家去研究探索。了解新病原的研究工具,借鉴SARS-CoV和MERS-CoV的研究经验,在基因合成技术提升的背景下,仅需新病原基因组序列就可开发基础研究工具,进行减毒疫苗株、筛...     

从肠道菌群角度再认识血管紧张素转换酶2在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2致病机制中的潜在作用

2019冠状病毒病(coronavirus disease 2019,COVID-19)的病原学和临床表现多有报道。该病在病原学和临床表现上与发生在2003年的严重急性呼吸综合征(severe acute respiratory syndrome, SARS)有诸多相似性。本文通过对比两者异同,尝试从其共同受体血管紧张素转换酶2(angiotensin converting enzyme 2,ACE2)角度,提出并探讨患者肠道菌群可能参与其致病的潜在机制,旨在为深入探索新型冠状病毒,即严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2)的致病机制及加速研发重症肺炎预测指标提供一种可能的新思路。     

Dynamic Changes of Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Patients at Early Stage of Outbreak

Virologica Sinica - The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has spread around the world with high mortality. To diagnose promptly and accurately is the vital step to...     

A Prognostic Model to Predict Recovery of COVID-19 Patients Based on Longitudinal Laboratory Findings

Virologica Sinica - The temporal change patterns of laboratory data may provide insightful clues into the whole course of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal change patterns of key...     

Viral and Antibody Kinetics of COVID-19 Patients with Different Disease Severities in Acute and Convalescent Phases: A 6-Month Follow-Up Study

Virologica Sinica - Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread rapidly around the world, posing a major threat to human...     

Cell-Type-Specific Immune Dysregulation in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients

1. Download : Download high-res image (182KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Increased sTREM-1 plasma concentrations are associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19

Patients with sepsis display increased concentrations of sTREM-1 (soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 1), and a phase II clinical trial focusing on TREM-1 modulation is ongoing. We investigated whether sTREM-1 circulating concentrations are associated with the outcome of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to assess the role of this pathway in COVID-19. This observational study was performed in two independent cohorts of patients with COVID-19. Plasma concentrations of sTREM-1 were assessed after ICU admission (pilot cohort) or after COVID-19 diagnosis (validation cohort). Routine laboratory and clinical parameters were collected from electronic patient files. Results showed sTREM-1 plasma concentrations were significantly elevated in patients with COVID-19 (161 [129–196] pg/ml) compared to healthy controls (104 [75–124] pg/ml; P<0.001). Patients with severe COVID-19 needing ICU admission displayed even higher sTREM-1 concentrations compared to less severely ill COVID-19 patients receiving clinical ward-based care (235 [176–319] pg/ml and 195 [139–283] pg/ml, respectively, P = 0.017). In addition, higher sTREM-1 plasma concentrations were observed in patients who did not survive the infection (326 [207–445] pg/ml) compared to survivors (199 [142–278] pg/ml, P<0.001). Survival analyses indicated that patients with higher sTREM-1 concentrations are at higher risk for death (hazard ratio = 3.3, 95%CI: 1.4–7.8). In conclusion, plasma sTREM-1 concentrations are elevated in patients with COVID-19, relate to disease severity, and discriminate between survivors and non-survivors. This suggests that the TREM-1 pathway is involved in the inflammatory reaction and the disease course of COVID-19, and therefore may be considered as a therapeutic target in severely ill patients with COVID-19.     

COVID-19: Antiviral Agents,Antibody Development and Traditional Chinese Medicine

Virologica Sinica - The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the first pandemic caused by coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome...     

冠状病毒疫苗的研究进展

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2)自被发现以来就引起了人们的广泛关注,开发针对该病毒的安全、有效疫苗成为近期的研究热点。本文以高致病性冠状病毒疫苗(包括灭活疫苗、重组亚单位疫苗、重组病毒载体疫苗和核酸疫苗)的研究展开综述,为研制SARS-CoV-2疫苗提供参考。     

新型冠状病毒肺炎:实验室检测、治疗及疫苗

新型冠状病毒肺炎(2019 novel coronavirus disease,COVID-19),一种由动物来源的新型冠状病毒(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,SRAS-CoV-2)感染所致的疾病在全球范围内急速传播,严重的危害人类的健康.快速、准确的诊...     

Current utilization of interferon alpha for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: A comprehensive review

Recent studies have identified an association between perturbed type I interferon (IFN) responses and the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). IFNα intervention may normalize the dysregulated innate immunity of COVID-19. However, details regarding its utilization and therapeutic evidence have yet to be systematically evaluated. The aim of this comprehensive review was to summarize the current utilization of IFNα for COVID-19 treatment and to explore the evidence on safety and efficacy. A comprehensive review of clinical studies in the literature prior to December 1st_, 2021, was performed to identify the current utilization of IFNα, which included details on the route of administration, the number of patients who received the treatment, the severity at the initiation of treatment, age range, the time from the onset of symptoms to treatment, dose, frequency, and duration as well as safety and efficacy. Encouragingly, no evidence was found against the safety of IFNα treatment for COVID-19. Early intervention, either within five days from the onset of symptoms or at hospital admission, confers better clinical outcomes, whereas late intervention may result in prolonged hospitalization.