OB Fold-containing Protein 1 (OBFC1), a Human Homolog of Yeast Stn1, Associates with TPP1 and Is Implicated in Telomere Length Regulation

The telosome/shelterin, a six-protein complex formed by TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, POT1, and TPP1, functions as the core of the telomere interactome, acting as the molecular platform for the assembly of higher order complexes and coordinating cross-talks between various protein subcomplexes. Within the telosome, there are two oligonucleotide- or oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold-containing proteins, TPP1 and POT1. They can form heterodimers that bind to the telomeric single-stranded DNA, an activity that is central for telomere end capping and telomerase recruitment. Through proteomic analyses, we found that in addition to POT1, TPP1 can associate with another OB fold-containing protein, OBFC1/AAF44. The yeast homolog of OBFC1 is Stn1, which plays a critical role in telomere regulation. We show here that OBFC1/AAF44 can localize to telomeres in human cells and bind to telomeric single-stranded DNA in vitro. Furthermore, overexpression of an OBFC1 mutant resulted in elongated telomeres in human cells, implicating OBFC1/AAF4 in telomere length regulation. Taken together, our studies suggest that OBFC1/AAF44 represents a new player in the telomere interactome for telomere maintenance.Telomeres are specialized linear chromosome end structures, which are regulated and protected by networks of protein complexes (1–4). Telomere length, structure, and integrity are critical for the cells and the organism as a whole. Telomere dysregulation can lead to DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoint, genome instability, and predisposition to cancer (5–9). Mammalian telomeres are composed of double-stranded (TTAGGG)_n repeats followed by 3′-single-stranded overhangs (10). In addition to the telomerase that directly mediates the addition of telomere repeats to the end of chromosomes (11, 12), a multitude of telomere-specific proteins have been identified that form the telosome/shelterin complex and participate in telomere maintenance (9, 13). The telosome in turn acts as the platform onto which higher order telomere regulatory complexes may be assembled into the telomere interactome (14). The telomere interactome has been proposed to integrate the complex and labyrinthine network of protein signaling pathways involved in DNA damage response, cell cycle checkpoint, and chromosomal end maintenance and protection for telomere homeostasis and genome stability.Of the six telomeric proteins (TRF1, TRF2, RAP1, TIN2, POT1, and TPP1) that make up the telosome, TRF1 and TRF2 have been shown to bind telomeric double-stranded DNA (15, 16), whereas the OB³ fold-containing protein POT1 exhibits high affinities for telomeric ssDNA in vitro (17, 18). Although the OB fold of TPP1 does not show appreciable ssDNA binding activity, heterodimerization of TPP1 and POT1 enhances the POT1 ssDNA binding (17, 18). More importantly, POT1 depends on TPP1 for telomere recruitment, and the POT1-TPP1 heterodimer functions in telomere end protection and telomerase recruitment. Notably, the OB fold of TPP1 is critical for the recruitment of the telomerase (18). Disruption of POT1-TPP1 interaction by dominant negative inhibition, RNA interference, or gene targeting could lead to dysregulation of telomere length as well DNA damage responses at the telomeres (18–21).In budding yeast, the homolog of mammalian POT1, Cdc13, has been shown to interact with two other OB fold-containing proteins, Stn1 and Ten1, to form a Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1 (CST) complex (22, 23). The CST complex participates in both telomere length control and telomere end capping (22, 23). The presence of multiple OB fold-containing proteins from yeast to human suggests a common theme for telomere ssDNA protection (4). Indeed, it has been proposed that the CST complex is structurally analogous to the replication factor A complex and may in fact function as a telomere-specific replication factor A complex (23). Notably, homologs of the CST complex have been found in other species such as Arabidopsis (24), further supporting the notion that multiple OB fold proteins may be involved in evolutionarily conserved mechanisms for telomere end protection and length regulation. It remains to be determined whether the CST complex exists in mammals.Although the circuitry of interactions among telosome components has been well documented and studied, how core telosome subunits such as TPP1 help to coordinate the cross-talks between telomere-specific signaling pathways and other cellular networks remains unclear. To this end, we carried out large scale immunoprecipitations and mass spectrometry analysis of the TPP1 protein complexes in mammalian cells. Through these studies, we identified OB fold-containing protein 1 (OBFC1) as a new TPP1-associated protein. OBFC1 is also known as α-accessory factor AAF44 (36). Sequence alignment analysis indicates that OBFC1 is a homolog of the yeast Stn1 protein (25). Further biochemical and cellular studies demonstrate the association of OBFC1 with TPP1 in live cells. Moreover, we showed that OBFC1 bound to telomeric ssDNA and localized to telomeres in mammalian cells. Dominant expression of an OBFC1 mutant led to telomere length dysregulation, indicating that OBFC1 is a novel telomere-associated OB fold protein functioning in telomere length regulation.     

Identification of the Determinant Conferring Permissive Substrate Usage in the Telomere Resolvase, ResT

Linear genome stability requires specialized telomere replication and protection mechanisms. A common solution to this problem in non-eukaryotes is the formation of hairpin telomeres by telomere resolvases (also known as protelomerases). These enzymes perform a two-step transesterification on replication intermediates to generate hairpin telomeres using an active site similar to that of tyrosine recombinases and type IB topoisomerases. Unlike phage telomere resolvases, the telomere resolvase from the Lyme disease pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi (ResT) is a permissive enzyme that resolves several types of telomere in vitro. However, the ResT region and residues mediating permissive substrate usage have not been identified. The relapsing fever Borrelia hermsii ResT exhibits a more restricted substrate usage pattern than B. burgdorferi ResT and cannot efficiently resolve a Type 2 telomere. In this study, we determined that all relapsing fever ResTs process Type 2 telomeres inefficiently. Using a library of chimeric and mutant B. hermsii/B. burgdorferi ResTs, we mapped the determinants in B. burgdorferi ResT conferring the ability to resolve multiple Type 2 telomeres. Type 2 telomere resolution was dependent on a single proline in the ResT catalytic region that was conserved in all Lyme disease but not relapsing fever ResTs and that is part of a 2-amino acid insertion absent from phage telomere resolvase sequences. The identification of a permissive substrate usage determinant explains the ability of B. burgdorferi ResT to process the 19 unique telomeres found in its segmented genome and will aid further studies on the structure and function of this essential enzyme.Replication and protection of telomeric DNA are required to ensure the genomic stability of all organisms with linear replicons. Until quite recently, it was assumed that linearity is a property confined to the replicons of eukaryotes and certain primarily eukaryotic viruses. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that linear DNA is also found in a broad range of bacteriophages (1–6) and in bacteria themselves (7–10), including the Borrelia species that cause Lyme disease and relapsing fever (11, 12). A common solution to the end replication and protection problem in non-eukaryotes is the covalent sealing of DNA ends in the form of hairpins (2, 4–6, 10, 11, 13–16). Hairpin DNA is not recognized as a double-strand break, and continuous synthesis of DNA around the hairpin loop abolishes the end replication problem. However, mother and daughter replicons are covalently linked at the junction of their telomeres following DNA replication; separation of the two replicons and formation of new hairpin telomeres require a DNA breakage and reunion process referred to as telomere resolution (17, 18).Resolution of the linear chromosome and plasmids in Borrelia species and of the linear plasmid prophages from Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Klebsiella oxytoca is performed by telomere resolvases (also referred to as protelomerases) (5, 19–21). A growing number of candidate telomere resolvases have been identified in the genomes of eukaryotic viruses, phages, and bacteria (22, 23). Telomere resolvases are DNA cleavage and rejoining enzymes related to tyrosine recombinases and type 1B topoisomerases (19, 21, 22, 24, 25). Telomere resolvase catalyzes a two-step transesterification reaction in which staggered cuts are introduced 6 bp apart on either side of the axis of symmetry in the replicated telomere substrate (5, 19, 21, 24). Cleavage is accompanied by the formation of a 3′-phosphotyrosyl protein-DNA linkage. Subsequent nucleophilic attack on opposing strands by the free 5′-OH groups in the nicked substrate creates covalently closed hairpin telomeres. A recent crystal structure of the Klebsiella phage telomere resolvase (TelK) in complex with its substrate identified the residues involved in catalysis (25); all but one of these residues are conserved in all telomere resolvases (22), implying that the basic catalytic mechanism underlying telomere resolution is conserved. However, telomere resolvase sequences vary substantially outside of the central catalytic region (25, 26), and the enzymes characterized to date demonstrate important differences in substrate usage that likely reflect functionally distinct mechanisms of substrate interaction.The Borrelia burgdorferi telomere resolvase, ResT, appears to be particularly divergent. It is substantially smaller than phage telomere resolvases, and unlike its phage counterparts (5, 20, 21), it cannot efficiently resolve negatively supercoiled DNA (19, 27), presumably reflecting differences in the substrates resolved by phage and Borrelia telomere resolvases in vivo. On the other hand, B. burgdorferi ResT can fuse hairpin telomeres in a reversal of the resolution reaction (28), a function that is not shared with the phage telomere resolvase TelK (25). It can also synapse replicated telomeres and catalyze the formation of Holliday junctions (29). The ability of ResT to promote hairpin fusion has been proposed as the mechanism underlying the ongoing genetic rearrangements that are a prominent feature of the B. burgdorferi genome (18, 28). Finally, B. burgdorferi ResT can tolerate a surprising amount of variation in its substrate (30, 31), a feature that is not shared by phage telomere resolvases (21). Although B. burgdorferi ResT appears to be more permissive with a greater scope of activities than other telomere resolvases, the sequences mediating most of its unique properties have not yet been identified.The B. burgdorferi genome contains a total of 19 distinct hairpin sequences, all of which must be resolved by ResT (31). These sequences can be classified into three groups based on the presence and positioning of the box 1 motif, which is a critical determinant of activity in phage and Borrelia telomere resolvases (see Fig. 1A) (21, 24, 30). A box 1-like motif is also found in many of the hairpin telomeres sequenced to date (6, 14, 32–35), although its function in telomere resolution is unknown. The box 1 consensus sequence (TAT(a/t)AT) closely resembles the −10/Pribnow box and TATA box consensus sequences of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters (TATAAT and TATA(a/t)A(a/t), respectively), which undergo transient deformations that predispose them to melting (36) and are intrinsically bent and anisotropically flexible (37). Therefore, box 1 may facilitate nucleation of hairpin folding and/or may confer an intrinsic bend or flexibility to substrates that is important for the resolution reaction.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Species-specific resolution of Type I and 2 telomeres. A, a schematic showing the three types of hairpin telomere found on the linear replicons of the B. burgdorferi genome (see Ref. 31). The box 1 sequence in Type 1 and 2 telomeres is situated 1 and 4 nucleotides away from the axis of symmetry, respectively, whereas Type 3 telomeres contain no clear box 1. B, a schematic illustrating the telomere resolution reaction substrate and products is shown along with two ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels showing telomere resolution assays. The gels show resolution kinetics for B. burgdorferi and B. hermsii ResT on Type 1 and 2 telomeres (plasmid substrates pYT1/lp17L and pYT92/chromL, respectively).B. burgdorferi ResT can resolve telomeres in which box 1 is located at positions 1 and 4 nucleotides away from the axis of symmetry (Type 1 and 2 telomeres, respectively), as well as AT-rich telomeres without a box 1 sequence (Type 3 telomeres) (see Fig. 1A) (30, 31). B. burgdorferi ResT cleaves telomeres at a fixed position relative to the axis of symmetry, independent of the location of box 1 (30). Positioning of the enzyme for cleavage in all telomere types is most likely driven by sequence-specific interactions between ResT domains 2 (catalytic) and/or 3 (C-terminal) and a fixed element upstream of box 1 that is positioned 14 nucleotides from the axis of symmetry in all Borrelia telomeres (box 3 and adjacent nucleotides) (see Figs. 1A and ​and2)2) (26, 30, 31). In contrast, box 1 and axis-flanking nucleotides are not involved in high affinity and/or sequence-specific interactions with ResT and require the ResT N-terminal domain for full protection in DNase footprinting assays (26, 27). The most likely candidate for interactions with box 1 and axis-flanking nucleotides is a Borrelia-specific hairpin-binding region in the N terminus, which is thought to promote a pre-hairpinning step involving strand opening at the axis (38).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 2.Alignment of 11 Borrelia ResT sequences. Shown is ClustalW2 alignment of ResT amino acid sequences from five Lyme disease Borrelia species (B. afzelii, B. spielmanii, B. valaisiana, B. garinii, and B. burgdorferi), five relapsing fever Borrelia species (B. turicatae, B. parkeri, B. hermsii, B. recurrentis, and B. duttonii), and one avian Borrelia species (B. anserina) (generated using ClustalW2 from the EBI web site) (19, 39–42, 48, 49). The sequences for B. anserina, B. parkeri, and B. turicatae ResTs are reported for the first time in this study (respective GenBank accession numbers are {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"FJ882620","term_id":"242263541","term_text":"FJ882620"}}FJ882620, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"FJ882621","term_id":"242263543","term_text":"FJ882621"}}FJ882621, and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"FJ882623","term_id":"242263547","term_text":"FJ882623"}}FJ882623). Sequences are arranged in order of similarity to neighboring sequences and are colored in JalView using the Zappo coloring scheme for identifying amino acids with similar physicochemical properties (50). Only residues that are identical in 100% of ResTs are indicated by colored shading. Arrows above the alignment indicate ResT domain boundaries identified by chymotrypsin digest, sequence comparison with other proteins, and HHsenser predictions (26, 51). The hairpin-binding motif found in cut-and-paste transposases is indicated beneath the alignment by white text on a black background (38). The positions corresponding to the active site residues in tyrosine recombinases, type IB topoisomerases, and TelK are indicated by blue asterisks below the sequence, with the active site tyrosine nucleophile at position 335 marked by a red asterisk (22, 25). The ringed black dot below position 326 indicates an amino acid in the active site region that differs in Lyme disease and relapsing fever ResTs. Sequences above the black line drawn between B. burgdorferi and B. turicatae are from Lyme disease Borrelia species; sequences below the black line are from relapsing fever Borrelia species. The ResT sequence from the avian Borrelia species B. anserina is shown at bottom.ResT from the relapsing fever Borrelia species Borrelia hermsii exhibits a more restricted substrate usage pattern in vitro when compared with ResT from the Lyme disease pathogen B. burgdorferi (39). Specifically, B. hermsii ResT is unable to efficiently resolve a Type 2 telomere. Therefore, B. burgdorferi ResT appears to be a more permissive enzyme than its relapsing fever counterpart. In this study, we investigated the basis for permissive substrate usage by B. burgdorferi ResT. Using a library of chimeric B. hermsii/B. burgdorferi ResTs, we mapped the sequence determinants in B. burgdorferi ResT that confer the ability to resolve multiple Type 2 telomeres. Surprisingly, this approach indicated that Type 2 telomere resolution was crucially regulated by a single proline residue located in a small Borrelia-specific insertion in the central catalytic region of ResT. The proline at this position was conserved in the ResTs from all Lyme disease Borrelia species but in none of the ResTs from relapsing fever Borrelia species, which were unable to efficiently resolve Type 2 telomeres in vitro. This study has identified a specific residue in ResT responsible for permissive substrate usage patterns.     

Revealing Novel Telomere Proteins Using in Vivo Cross-linking,Tandem Affinity Purification,and Label-free Quantitative LC-FTICR-MS

Telomeres are DNA-protein structures that protect chromosome ends from the actions of the DNA repair machinery. When telomeric integrity is compromised, genomic instability ensues. Considerable effort has focused on identification of telomere-binding proteins and elucidation of their functions. To date, protein identification has relied on classical immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometric approaches, primarily under conditions that favor isolation of proteins with strong or long lived interactions that are present at sufficient quantities to visualize by SDS-PAGE. To facilitate identification of low abundance and transiently associated telomere-binding proteins, we developed a novel approach that combines in vivo protein-protein cross-linking, tandem affinity purification, and stringent sequential endoprotease digestion. Peptides were identified by label-free comparative nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Here, we expressed an epitope-tagged telomere-binding protein and utilized a modified chromatin immunoprecipitation approach to cross-link associated proteins. The resulting immunoprecipitant contained telomeric DNA, establishing that this approach captures bona fide telomere binding complexes. To identify proteins present in the immunocaptured complexes, samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested with sequential endoprotease treatment. The resulting peptides were purified using a microscale porous graphite stationary phase and analyzed using nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Proteins enriched in cells expressing HA-FLAG-TIN2 were identified by label-free quantitative analysis of the FTICR mass spectra from different samples and ion trap tandem mass spectrometry followed by database searching. We identified all of the proteins that constitute the telomeric shelterin complex, thus validating the robustness of this approach. We also identified 62 novel telomere-binding proteins. These results demonstrate that DNA-bound protein complexes, including those present at low molar ratios, can be identified by this approach. The success of this approach will allow us to create a more complete understanding of telomere maintenance and have broad applicability.Numerous redundant systems exist to maintain the genome and ensure proper segregation of genetic material upon cellular division. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that constitute these systems is an area of intense inquiry. In model systems, elegant genetic approaches have been used extensively to identify proteins and interrogate their role in these mechanisms. Unfortunately, mammalian systems are refractory to similar approaches, and thus protein identification has relied heavily on homology searches and mass spectrometry. For this reason, the development of isolation procedures and refined mass spectrometric approaches capable of identifying proteins within large protein complexes, including those present as transient interactors and in substoichiometric quantities, is an important area of research. Previous studies have successfully utilized quantitative proteomics with stable isotopic peptide labeling to identify specific components of cellular macromolecular complexes by affinity purification (1–6). More recently, high resolution mass spectrometry with label-free quantification has been shown to improve and extend quantitative proteomics toward comprehensive analysis of protein complexes (7).Telomeres are DNA-protein structures located at the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes (see Fig. 1). The DNA portion of telomeres consists of a double-stranded region and a single-stranded 3′ overhang, both composed of repetitive non-coding G-rich sequences (TTAGGG). In addition to the DNA component, proteins bind the telomere and contribute to its stability. Six core proteins (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, RAP1, and ACD/TPP1), collectively known as the shelterin (or telosome) complex, are constitutively present at the telomere (for reviews, see Refs. 8 and 9). Together, the telomeric DNA and shelterin complex maintain a “capped” or functional telomere that protects the end of the chromosome by distinguishing it from a bona fide double strand DNA break (10). When telomeres become uncapped or “dysfunctional,” they no longer carry out this protective function, rendering the chromosome ends susceptible to DNA repair enzymes. In the absence of functional checkpoints, uncapped telomeres can lead to end-to-end fusions that drive genomic instability, a hallmark of human cancer (11).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Fluorescent in situ hybridization reveals presence of telomeres at termini of human chromosomes. Top panel, representative metaphase spread from human cells. FISH analysis reveals the presence of telomeres (red) and centromeres (green), and chromosomal DNA (blue) was detected by DAPI staining. Bottom panel, schematic drawing of a telomere loop (T-Loop) showing the shelterin core complex (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, RAP1, and TPP1) as well as a subset of known telomere-binding proteins (in gray). Question marks indicate that more telomere-binding proteins remain to be identified. WRN, Werner, BLM, Bloom, and XPF, xeroderma pigmentosum type F.Recent work has revealed that in addition to the shelterin complex a growing list of proteins associate with the telomere and play essential roles in telomere maintenance (a subset of these proteins, colored in gray, is depicted in Fig. 1). Paradoxically, many of these proteins play roles in DNA repair and recombination. These proteins include the MRE11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex involved in recombinational repair (12); Ku70 and Ku80, which are members of the non-homologous end joining complex (13); the ERCC1/XPF nucleotide excision repair endonuclease (14); and the ataxia telagiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase (12, 15). Additional proteins have been found at the telomere in low stoichiometric ratios, including telomerase, which binds the telomere during S phase and adds telomeric repeats to the ends of the chromosomes (16, 17). The Werner helicase is also present at the telomeres during S phase where it plays an important role in lagging strand DNA replication (18). Despite the plethora of proteins known to bind to the telomere, many proteins that act in a transient manner and/or are present in substoichiometric quantities remain to be identified.To identify novel telomere-binding proteins, we developed a method that involves chemical cross-linking of protein complexes in live cells to capture transient interactions followed by affinity purification of the cross-linked telomere complex with an epitope-tagged telomeric protein, TIN2. Using the affinity-captured protein preparations, we optimized cross-link reversal, sequential endoprotease digestion, and microscale solid phase peptide purification. The peptide pools were analyzed using nano-LC-FTICR-MS. Comparative quantitative analysis of affinity-purified proteins from cells overexpressing the epitope-tagged TIN2 and control cells was performed using the peptide ion currents at accurate m/z values from the aligned LC-MS chromatograms across multiple samples. The proteins were identified using tandem MS with spectral matching against protein databases. Using this approach, we identified the six members of the shelterin complex and other proteins previously reported to bind to the telomere. We also identified a novel group of candidate telomere-binding proteins that were significantly enriched in samples expressing epitope-tagged TIN2 (HA¹-FLAG-TIN2) compared with non-expressing control cells. Importantly, the presence of telomeric DNA in our immunoprecipitants from cells expressing HA-FLAG-TIN2 but not in control cells demonstrates that it is possible to identify proteins bound to DNA by utilizing a protein-protein cross-linking reagent. This strategy will prove versatile for the identification of other proteins found in large protein complexes as well as bound to DNA.     

Comprehensive Identification of Proteins from MALDI Imaging

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI IMS) is a powerful tool for the visualization of proteins in tissues and has demonstrated considerable diagnostic and prognostic value. One main challenge is that the molecular identity of such potential biomarkers mostly remains unknown. We introduce a generic method that removes this issue by systematically identifying the proteins embedded in the MALDI matrix using a combination of bottom-up and top-down proteomics. The analyses of ten human tissues lead to the identification of 1400 abundant and soluble proteins constituting the set of proteins detectable by MALDI IMS including >90% of all IMS biomarkers reported in the literature. Top-down analysis of the matrix proteome identified 124 mostly N- and C-terminally fragmented proteins indicating considerable protein processing activity in tissues. All protein identification data from this study as well as the IMS literature has been deposited into MaTisse, a new publically available database, which we anticipate will become a valuable resource for the IMS community.Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI IMS)¹ is an emerging technique that can be described as a multi-color molecular microscope as it allows visualizing the distribution of many molecules as mass to charge (m/z) signals in parallel in situ (1). Originally described some 15 years ago (2) the method has been successfully adapted to different analyte classes including small molecule drugs (3), metabolites (4), lipids (5), proteins (6), and peptides (7) using e.g. formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) as well as fresh frozen tissue (8). Because the tissue stays intact in the process, MALDI IMS is compatible with histochemistry (9) as well as immunohistochemistry and thus adds an additional dimension of molecular information to classical microscopy based tissue analysis (10). Imaging of proteins is appealing as it conceptually allows determining the localization and abundance of proteoforms (11) that naturally occur in the tissue under investigation including modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, or ubiquitination, protease mediated cleavage or truncation (12). Therefore a proteinous m/z species detected by MALDI IMS can be viewed as an in situ molecular probe of a particular biological process. In turn, m/z abundance patterns that discriminate different physiological or pathological conditions might be used as diagnostic or even prognostic markers (13, 14). In recent years, MALDI IMS of proteins has been successfully applied to different cancer types from the brain (15), breast (16, 17), kidney (18), prostate (19), and skin (20). Furthermore, the technique has been applied in the context of colon inflammation (21), embryonic development (22), Alzheimer''s disease (23), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (24). With a few notable exceptions (13, 14, 16–18, 20, 24–30), the identity of the proteins constituting the observed characteristic m/z patters has generally remained elusive. This not only precludes the validation of the putative biomarkers by, for example, immunohistochemistry, but also the elucidation of the biological processes that might underlie the observed phenotype.Here, we introduce a straightforward extraction and identification method for proteins embedded in the MALDI matrix layer that represent the molecular species amenable to MALDI IMS. Using a bottom-up proteomics approach including tryptic digestion and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), we first created an inventory list of proteins derived from this layer, which we term the MALDI matrix proteome. Although the bottom-up approach breaks the link between the identified proteins and the m/z species detected in MALDI IMS, the list of identified proteins serves as the pool of proteins from which all potential biomarkers are most likely derived. Indeed we detected >90% of all human MALDI IMS biomarkers reported in the literature by analyzing just ten human tissues. In addition, the results demonstrate that the same inventory can be used as a focused database for direct top-down sequencing and identification of proteins extracted from the MALDI matrix layer. The proposed method is generic and can be applied to any MALDI IMS study, which is why we believe that one of the major challenges in identifying MALDI IMS biomarkers has now been overcome. In addition, we provide a list of all proteins and peptides identified in the MALDI matrices and tissues studied here as well as a comprehensive list of m/z species identified in the literature dealing with MALDI imaging of humans and rodents. This information has been compiled in MaTisse (http://www.wzw.tum.de/bioanalytik/matisse), a new publically available and searchable database, which we believe will become a valuable tool for the MALDI imaging community.     

Repeated Domains of Leptospira Immunoglobulin-like Proteins Interact with Elastin and Tropoelastin

Leptospira spp., the causative agents of leptospirosis, adhere to components of the extracellular matrix, a pivotal role for colonization of host tissues during infection. Previously, we and others have shown that Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins (Lig) of Leptospira spp. bind to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and fibrinogen. In this study, we report that Leptospira can be immobilized by human tropoelastin (HTE) or elastin from different tissues, including lung, skin, and blood vessels, and that Lig proteins can bind to HTE or elastin. Moreover, both elastin and HTE bind to the same LigB immunoglobulin-like domains, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12 as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and competition ELISAs. The LigB immunoglobulin-like domain binds to the 17th to 27th exons of HTE (17–27HTE) as determined by ELISA (LigBCon4, K_D = 0.50 μm; LigBCen7′–8, K_D = 0.82 μm; LigBCen9, K_D = 1.54 μm; and LigBCen12, K_D = 0.73 μm). The interaction of LigBCon4 and 17–27HTE was further confirmed by steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (K_D = 0.49 μm) and ITC (K_D = 0.54 μm). Furthermore, the binding was enthalpy-driven and affected by environmental pH, indicating it is a charge-charge interaction. The binding affinity of LigBCon4D341N to 17–27HTE was 4.6-fold less than that of wild type LigBCon4. In summary, we show that Lig proteins of Leptospira spp. interact with elastin and HTE, and we conclude this interaction may contribute to Leptospira adhesion to host tissues during infection.Pathogenic Leptospira spp. are spirochetes that cause leptospirosis, a serious infectious disease of people and animals (1, 2). Weil syndrome, the severe form of leptospiral infection, leads to multiorgan damage, including liver failure (jaundice), renal failure (nephritis), pulmonary hemorrhage, meningitis, abortion, and uveitis (3, 4). Furthermore, this disease is not only prevalent in many developing countries, it is reemerging in the United States (3). Although leptospirosis is a serious worldwide zoonotic disease, the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira infection remain enigmatic. Recent breakthroughs in applying genetic tools to Leptospira may facilitate studies on the molecular pathogenesis of leptospirosis (5–8).The attachment of pathogenic Leptospira spp. to host tissues is critical in the early phase of Leptospira infection. Leptospira spp. adhere to host tissues to overcome mechanical defense systems at tissue surfaces and to initiate colonization of specific tissues, such as the lung, kidney, and liver. Leptospira invade hosts tissues through mucous membranes or injured epidermis, coming in contact with subepithelial tissues. Here, certain bacterial outer surface proteins serve as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)² to mediate the binding of bacteria to different extracellular matrices (ECMs) of host cells (9). Several leptospiral MSCRAMMs have been identified (10–18), and we speculate that more will be identified in the near future.Lig proteins are distributed on the outer surface of pathogenic Leptospira, and the expression of Lig protein is only found in low passage strains (14, 16, 17), probably induced by environmental cues such as osmotic or temperature changes (19). Lig proteins can bind to fibrinogen and a variety of ECMs, including fibronectin (Fn), laminin, and collagen, thereby mediating adhesion to host cells (20–23). Lig proteins also constitute good vaccine candidates (24–26).Elastin is a component of ECM critical to tissue elasticity and resilience and is abundant in skin, lung, blood vessels, placenta, uterus, and other tissues (27–29). Tropoelastin is the soluble precursor of elastin (28). During the major phase of elastogenesis, multiple tropoelastin molecules associate through coacervation (30–32). Because of the abundance of elastin or tropoelastin on the surface of host cells, several bacterial MSCRAMMs use elastin and/or tropoelastin to mediate adhesion during the infection process (33–35).Because leptospiral infection is known to cause severe pulmonary hemorrhage (36, 37) and abortion (38), we hypothesize that some leptospiral MSCRAMMs may interact with elastin and/or tropoelastin in these elastin-rich tissues. This is the first report that Lig proteins of Leptospira interact with elastin and tropoelastin, and the interactions are mediated by several specific immunoglobulin-like domains of Lig proteins, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12, which bind to the 17th to 27th exons of human tropoelastin (HTE).     

A Straight Path to Circular Proteins

Folding and stability are parameters that control protein behavior. The possibility of conferring additional stability on proteins has implications for their use in vivo and for their structural analysis in the laboratory. Cyclic polypeptides ranging in size from 14 to 78 amino acids occur naturally and often show enhanced resistance toward denaturation and proteolysis when compared with their linear counterparts. Native chemical ligation and intein-based methods allow production of circular derivatives of larger proteins, resulting in improved stability and refolding properties. Here we show that circular proteins can be made reversibly with excellent efficiency by means of a sortase-catalyzed cyclization reaction, requiring only minimal modification of the protein to be circularized.Sortases are bacterial enzymes that predominantly catalyze the attachment of surface proteins to the bacterial cell wall (1, 2). Other sortases polymerize pilin subunits for the construction of the covalently stabilized and covalently anchored pilus of the Gram-positive bacterium (3–5). The reaction catalyzed by sortase involves the recognition of short 5-residue sequence motifs, which are cleaved by the enzyme with the concomitant formation of an acyl enzyme intermediate between the active site cysteine of sortase and the carboxylate at the newly generated C terminus of the substrate (1, 6–8). In many bacteria, this covalent intermediate can be resolved by nucleophilic attack from the pentaglycine side chain in a peptidoglycan precursor, resulting in the formation of an amide bond between the pentaglycine side chain and the carboxylate at the cleavage site in the substrate (9, 10). In pilus construction, alternative nucleophiles such as lysine residues or diaminopimelic acid participate in the transpeptidation reaction (3, 4).When appended near the C terminus of proteins that are not natural sortase substrates, the recognition sequence of Staphylococcus aureus sortase A (LPXTG) can be used to effectuate a sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation reaction using a diverse array of artificial glycine-based nucleophiles (Fig. 1). The result is efficient installation of a diverse set of moieties, including lipids (11), carbohydrates (12), peptide nucleic acids (13), biotin (14), fluorophores (14, 15), polymers (16), solid supports (16–18), or peptides (15, 19) at the C terminus of the protein substrate. During the course of our studies to further expand sortase-based protein engineering, we were struck by the frequency and relative ease with which intramolecular transpeptidation reactions were occurring. Specifically, proteins equipped with not only the LPXTG motif but also N-terminal glycine residues yielded covalently closed circular polypeptides (Fig. 1). Similar reactivity using sortase has been described in two previous cases; however, rigorous characterization of the circular polypeptides was absent (16, 20). The circular proteins in these reports were observed as minor components of more complex reaction mixtures, and the cyclization reaction itself was not optimized.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Protein substrates equipped with a sortase A recognition sequence (LPXTG) can participate in intermolecular transpeptidation with synthetic oligoglycine nucleophiles (left) or intramolecular transpeptidation if an N-terminal glycine residue is present (right).Here we describe our efforts toward applying sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation to the synthesis of circular and oligomeric proteins. This method has general applicability, as illustrated by successful intramolecular reactions with three structurally unrelated proteins. In addition to circularization of individual protein units, the multiprotein complex AAA-ATPase p97/VCP/CDC48, with six identical subunits containing the LPXTG motif and an N-terminal glycine, was found to preferentially react in daisy chain fashion to yield linear protein fusions. The reaction exploited here shows remarkable similarities to the mechanisms proposed for circularization of cyclotides, small circular proteins that have been isolated from plants (21–23).     

Insect Virus Proteins (FALPE and p10) Self-Associate To Form Filaments in Infected Cells

Entomopoxviruses and baculoviruses are pathogens of insects which replicate in the cytoplasm and nuclei of their host cells, respectively. During the late stages of infection, both groups of viruses produce occlusion bodies which serve to protect virions from the external environment. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy studies have shown that large bundles of filaments are associated with these occlusion bodies. Entomopoxviruses produce cytoplasmic fibrils which appear to be composed of the filament-associated late protein of entomopoxviruses (FALPE). Baculoviruses, on the other hand, yield filaments in the nuclei and cytoplasm of the infected cell which are composed of a protein called p10. Despite significant differences in their sequences, FALPE and p10 have similar hydrophilicity profiles, and each has a proline-rich stretch of amino acids at its carboxyl terminus. Evidence that FALPE and p10 could produce filaments in the absence of other viral proteins is presented. When FALPE was expressed in insect cells from a recombinant baculovirus, filaments similar to those produced by the wild-type Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus were observed. In addition, when expression plasmids containing FALPE or p10 genes were transfected into Vero monkey kidney cells, filament structures similar to those found in infected insect cells were produced. The manner in which FALPE and p10 subunits interact to form polymers was investigated through deletion and site-specific mutagenesis in conjunction with immunofluorescence microscopy, yeast two-hybrid protein interaction analysis, and chemical cross-linking of adjacent molecules. These studies indicated that the amino termini of FALPE and p10 were essential for subunit interaction. Although deletion of the carboxy termini did not affect this interaction, it did inhibit filament formation. In addition, modification of several potential sites for phosphorylation also abolished filament assembly. We concluded that although the sequences of FALPE and p10 were different, the structural and functional properties of the two polypeptides appeared to be similar.Cytoskeletal elements have previously been demonstrated to be involved in several aspects of virus assembly (39, 66). For example, vaccinia virus has been shown to associate with actin during its release from the plasma membrane (15), while adenovirus is transported through the cytoplasm to the nucleus through its interaction with microtubules (17, 38). Actin has been implicated in the transport of baculovirus nucleocapsids to the nucleus (10). Other viruses contain actin in their envelopes along with viral surface glycoproteins, implying some role in the budding process (34, 54, 58). In addition, cytochalasin D, a disruptor of microfilaments, has been shown to impair the assembly of a number of different viruses (18, 42, 45). Most viruses use preexisting microtubule or microfilament proteins derived from host cells in these processes. However, we have recently demonstrated that insect poxviruses establish their own filament network during the later stages of infection, using a protein encoded by the viral genome (2).Entomopoxviruses (EPVs) are insect pathogens which replicate in the cytoplasm of infected cells and are members of the poxvirus family (reviewed in references 3 to 5 and 22). The genomes of these viruses consist of linear double-stranded DNA molecules which are 130 to 300 kb in length. Amsacta moorei EPV (AmEPV) can be grown in cultured insect cells and is the most studied member of this group of viruses (22–25, 27, 40, 50). AmEPV derives its name from the Indian red army worm, a larva from the Lepidoptera family and the host from which the virus was originally isolated (23, 25, 50). Baculoviruses also infect Lepidoptera larvae but instead replicate in the nuclei of their host cells (44). A number of baculoviruses have been studied, but knowledge of Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcNPV), which infects a wide variety of larvae including that of the alfalfa leaf hopper, is most extensive (44). This virus is used routinely to produce recombinant proteins in insect virus expression systems (36, 44, 46, 49).A common property of EPVs and baculoviruses is the formation of large intracellular structures known as occlusion bodies which assemble during the late stages of viral infection. Virions are embedded within these occlusion bodies, and the process serves to protect the virus from the external environment. In the case of baculoviruses, the occlusion bodies are called polyhedra and are composed predominantly of a 31-kDa protein called polyhedrin (52). The occlusion bodies of EPVs are known as spheroids and consist mainly of a 110-kDa protein known as spheroidin (6, 9, 27, 55). Spheroidin and polyhedrin do not appear to exhibit sequence homology (6, 27, 52). A multilamellar envelope also appears to surround both polyhedra and spheroids and may help to stabilize these structures during assembly (2, 53).During the late phases of AmEPV and baculovirus infections, large bundles of filaments also appear to accumulate in the infected insect cells. In the case of AmEPV, these structures are present in the cytoplasm (2, 22, 23, 40), while those found in cells infected with baculoviruses reside both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus (1, 14, 57). Baculovirus fibrils are composed primarily of a 10-kDa protein called p10 (47, 59). The p10 gene sequences from AcNPV, Orgyia pseudotsugata nuclear polyhedrosis virus (OpNPV), Bombyx mori nuclear polyhedrosis virus, Perina nuda nuclear polyhedrosis virus, Spodoptera exigua nuclear polyhedrosis virus (SeNPV), and Choristoneura fumiferana nuclear polyhedrosis virus (CfNPV) have been reported (13, 32, 35, 66–68). Although the different p10 protein sequences only exhibit 39 to 51% identity and molecules from different species cannot interact with one another, it is believed that the polypeptides must be structurally and functionally similar (61, 66). Deletion mutagenesis of AcNPV p10 has demonstrated that both the amino- and carboxy-terminal regions of this protein are necessary for the formation of filaments in the infected cell (60). Other studies have assigned an aggregation function to the amino-terminal half of p10 (63, 65), and it has been shown that this region contains a coiled-coil domain which is conserved among the different baculoviruses (66). It is tempting to speculate that p10 aggregation is the result of coiled-coil interaction, but direct evidence for this hypothesis is lacking. The precise role of the carboxy terminus of p10 is still unclear, although it has been proposed to interact with tubulin (11). Deletion of the entire p10 open reading frame (ORF) through homologous recombination produces a mutant virus which is still capable of replication both in vitro and in vivo but produces fragile polyhedra with fragmented polyhedral envelopes (26, 64, 65). The p10 protein has also been implicated in disintegration of the nuclear envelope of the host cell, and this function appears to be associated with the carboxy terminus of this protein (61, 65).Our laboratory (2) recently demonstrated that the cytoplasmic filaments, which characterize the late stages of infection by AmEPV, are composed primarily of a 156-amino-acid protein called FALPE (filament-associated late protein of EPVs). These filaments are closely associated with the spheroids and their membrane envelopes. FALPE is a phosphoprotein which migrates on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels as a 25/27-kDa doublet. This protein also contains an unusual proline-glutamic acid repeat region spanning 20 residues in the carboxy terminus of the polypeptide. The ultrastructure and close association of this protein with the occlusion bodies of AmEPV suggested that FALPE and p10 played analogous roles during infections by the respective viruses.This article addresses the structural and functional similarities between FALPE and p10. These two viral proteins are known to be major components of filamentous structures, but it is not known whether additional viral or cellular proteins cooperate during the polymerization process. In this report, we provide insight into the mechanisms which produce filaments in cells infected with either baculoviruses or EPVs. We demonstrate that p10 and FALPE can produce filaments in the absence of other viral gene products. Using the yeast two-hybrid system and a chemical cross-linking agent, we obtained evidence for self-association of either FALPE or p10. Finally, the polypeptide regions of FALPE and p10 which are required for self-association and subsequent filament formation are mapped.