Feeding after fourth ventricular administration of neuropeptide Y receptor agonists in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) stimulate food intake after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle, suggesting that NPY receptors in the hindbrain are targets for the stimulatory effect of these peptides on food intake. However, the NPY/PYY receptor subtype mediating the feeding response in the hindbrain is not known. To approach to this question we compared dose-effect of several NPY receptor agonists to stimulate food intake in freely-feeding rats 60- and 120-min after injection into the fourth cerebral ventricle. At the 120-min time point, PYY was 2- to 10-times as potent as NPY over the dose-response range and stimulated twice the total intake at the maximally effective dose (2-fold greater efficacy). NPY was 2-times as potent as the Y1, Y5 receptor agonist, [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY but acted with comparable efficacy. The Y5-, Y2-differentiating receptor agonist, NPY 2-36, was comparable in potency to PYY at low doses but equal in efficacy NPY and [Leu(31)Pro(34)]NPY. The Y2 receptor agonist, NPY 13-36, produced only a marginal effect on total food intake. The profile of agonist potency after fourth cerebral ventricle administration is similar to the profile obtained when these or related agonists are injected in the region of the hypothalamus. Agonists at both Y1 and Y5 receptors stimulated food intake with a rank order of potency that does not conclusively favor the exclusive involvement of a single known NPY receptor subtype. Thus it is possible that the ingestive effects of NPY and PYY are mediated by multiple or novel receptor subtypes in the hindbrain. And the relatively greater potency and efficacy of PYY raises the possibility that a novel PYY-preferring receptor in the hindbrain is involved in the stimulation of food intake.     

The rewarding properties of neuropeptide Y in perifornical hypothalamus vs. nucleus accumbens

There is a high coexistence of substance abuse in humans with eating disorders. One theory offered to account for this fact is that a common biochemical substrate may exist that mediates both processes. Brain neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one neurochemical system that might contribute to these separate, yet related, problems. To clarify the role of NPY in mediating reward processes and the possible interaction between reward and feeding, the present study examined the effects of injecting NPY bilaterally into the perifornical hypothalamus (PFH) vs. the nucleus accumbens (NAC) on intake of preferred vs. non-preferred food types, as well as on conditioned place preference (CPP) learning. NPY (24, 78, 156 and 235 pmol/side) stimulated intake of both regular powdered chow and sucrose when injected into the PFH, but not the NAC. A CPP that was negatively correlated with food intake occurred with the low (24 pmol/side) dose of NPY in the PFH, while a CPP that was not correlated with food intake was produced with the same dose in the NAC. The extent of the CPPs produced by NPY injection in both brain sites mirrored that produced by peripheral injection of amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg). These results indicate that NPY elicits reward-related behavior, but not feeding, from the NAC, and both behaviors from the PFH. However, the feeding effect derived from the PFH appears to overshadow a rewarding effect derived from this site. Considered together, these findings suggest that altered NPY functioning in both brain regions may contribute to some of the pathophysiological processes observed in eating disordered patients who have additional proclivities for substance abuse.     

Neuropeptide Y receptor agonists: Multiple effects on spontaneous activity in the paraventricular hypothalamus

In vitro rat hypothalamic slices were used to examine the ability of neuropeptide Y (NPY), and the putative Y₁ and Y₂ receptor agonists [Pro³⁴]NPY, and [C²]NPY, to modify spontaneous single-neuron discharge in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). NPY and [Pro³⁴]NPY, at high concentrations (1500 nM), decreased discharge rates. At intermediate concentrations (150 nM) these peptides produced multiple effects, including increases, decreases, and biphasic changes. At lower concentrations (0.15–15 nM), they typically increased discharge rates. In contrast, [C²]NPY, at all concentrations (1.5–1500 nM), predominantly increased discharge rates. Thus, these NPY sybtype agonists have multiple effects on discharge rate, which may be due to action on multiple NPY receptor subtypes.     

Robust feeding following central administration of neuropeptide Y or peptide YY in chicks, Gallus domesticus

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) were injected intracerebroventricularly (ICV) in broiler chicks. Both NPY and PYY markedly increased food intake during the first hour post-injection compared to saline (SAL) controls. Food intake doubled in chicks given 5 micrograms NPY. A response surface analysis suggested that following ICV injection of NPY, maximum food intake occurred, using a dose of 9 micrograms. In contrast, an estimated dose between one and 5 micrograms PYY resulted in maximum food intake, giving the latter a slightly higher potency. Time spent drinking was not significantly different among NPY, PYY and SAL groups. Chicks given NPY or PYY also spent significantly less time standing while those given PYY spent significantly less time preening compared to controls.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes mediating nutritional suppression of estrous behavior in Syrian hamsters

Caloric deprivation inhibits reproduction, including copulatory behaviors, in female mammals. Decreases in metabolic fuel availability are detected in the hindbrain, and this information is relayed to the forebrain circuits controlling estrous behavior by neuropeptide Y (NPY) projections. In the forebrain, the nutritional inhibition of estrous behavior appears to be mediated by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) or urocortin-signaling systems. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of the CRF antagonist, astressin, prevents the suppression of lordosis by food deprivation and by NPY treatment in Syrian hamsters. These experiments sought to determine which CRF receptor type(s) is involved. ICV infusion of the CRF receptor subtype CRFR2-selective agonists urocortin 2 and 3 (UCN2, UCN3) inhibited sexual receptivity in hormone-primed, ovariectomized hamsters. Furthermore, the CRFR2-selective antagonist, astressin 2B, prevented the inhibition of estrous behavior by UCN2 and by NPY, consistent with a role for CRFR2. On the other hand, astressin 2B did not prevent the inhibition of behavior induced by 48-h food deprivation or ICV administration of CRF, a mixed CRFR1 and CRFR2 agonist, suggesting that activation of CRFR1 signaling is sufficient to inhibit sexual receptivity in hamsters. Although administration of CRFR1-selective antagonists (NBI-27914 and CP-154,526) failed to reverse the inhibition of receptivity by CRF treatment, we could not confirm their biological effectiveness in hamsters. The most parsimonious interpretation of these findings is that, although NPY inhibits estrous behavior via downstream CRFR2 signaling, food deprivation may exert its inhibition via both CRFR1 and CRFR2 and that redundant neuropeptide systems may be involved.     

Analysis of neuropeptide Y-induced feeding: dissociation of Y1 and Y2 receptor effects on natural meal patterns.

To differentiate NPY receptor subtypes, Y₁ and Y₂, in terms of their impact on feeding behavior, the intact molecule NPY(1–36) and the 3 fragments, NPY(2–36), the Y₁ agonist [Leu³¹,Pro³⁴]NPY, and the Y₂ agonist NPY(13–36), were injected (100 pmol/0.3 μl) into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of freely feeding rats. A computer-automated data acquisition system was employed in these experiments to permit a detailed analysis of feeding over the 12-h nocturnal cycle, in animals maintained on pure macronutrient diets. The results demonstrate that: 1) NPY(1–36) potentiates feeding behavior, primarily carbohydrate ingestion, by increasing the size and duration of the first meal after injection, rather than by affecting meal number or feeding rate, suggesting that NPY acts through mechanisms of satiety. The potentiation of carbohydrate intake occurs in association with a suppression of protein intake, which is strongest during the second meal after injection and which further increases the proportion of carbohydrate in the diet. No changes in fat ingestion are seen. 2) NPY(2–36), with the N-terminal tyrosine residue deleted, is equally potent to NPY(1–36) in potentiating carbohydrate intake and increasing meal size; however, it is less selective than NPY(1–36), producing an additional, smaller increase in consumption of protein. 3) The stimulatory effect of these peptides on carbohydrate intake and meal size is similarly observed, with somewhat reduced potency, after PVN injection of the selective Y₁ agonist [Leu³¹,Pro³⁴]NPY which, like NPY(1–36), also reduces protein intake. 4) The Y₂ receptor agonist, NPY(13–36), causes a decrease in the ingestion of carbohydrate, a smaller decline in protein intake, and a reduction in meal size. It is proposed that hypothalamic Y₁ receptors mediate the stimulatory effect of NPY on carbohydrate intake and meal size, while Y₂ receptors have the opposite effect of suppressing carbohydrate intake, possibly by altering presynaptic release of monoamines known to influence nutrient ingestion.     

ICV NPY Y1 receptor agonist but not Y5 agonist induces torpor-like hypothermia in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters

The reduced metabolism derived from daily torpor enables numerous small mammals, including Siberian hamsters, to survive periods of energetic challenge. Little is known of the neural mechanisms underlying the initiation and expression of torpor. Hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) contributes to surviving energetic challenges by both increasing food ingestion and reducing metabolic expenditure. Intracerebroventricular injections of NPY in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters induce torpor-like hypothermia comparable to natural torpor. Multiple NPY receptor subtypes have been identified, and the Y1 receptor and Y5 receptor both contribute to the orexigenic effect of NPY. The purpose of this research was to compare and contrast the effects of Y1 receptor activation by a specific Y1 agonist ([D-Arg25]-NPY) or Y5 receptor activation by a specific Y5 agonist ([D-Trp34]-NPY) on body temperature and subsequent food intake in cold-acclimated Siberian hamsters. Intracerebroventricular injections of Y1 agonist produced torporlike hypothermia closely resembling that induced by intracerebroventricular NPY. The intracerebroventricular Y5 agonist infrequently produced hypothermia reaching criterion for torpor and that failed to resemble either NPY-induced or natural torpor. Combined injections of Y1 and Y5 agonists resulted in hypothermia comparable to Y5 agonist treatments alone, negating the mimicry of NPY treatment seen with Y1 agonist alone. Prior treatment with Y1 agonist or Y5 agonist surprisingly had lingering effects on NPY-induced torpor expression, Y1 agonist enhanced and Y5 agonist inhibited the effect of NPY. The ability of NPY to induce torporlike hypothermia, especially its initiation, most likely involves activation of the NPY Y1 receptor subtype.     

Paraventricular hypothalamic alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone and MTII reduce feeding without causing aversive effects

alpha-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) appears to play a tonic inhibitory role in feeding and energy storage. MTII, a specific synthetic MC3-R/MC4-R agonist, has similar effects on feeding in rats. The current studies demonstrate that PVN administration of alpha-MSH or MTII decreases nocturnal and NPY-stimulated food intake without causing aversive effects. Co-administration with NPY of 600 pmol alpha-MSH or 1 pmol MTII into the PVN caused a significant decrease in NPY-induced feeding. PVN administration of MTII or alpha-MSH at doses effective to suppress feeding did not cause conditioned taste aversion (CTA). ICV administration of alpha-MSH, however, did cause weak CTA. These results indicate that the potent effects on feeding of MC3-R and MC4-R agonists when injected into the PVN are not due to aversive effects.     

NPY receptors and opioidergic system are involved in NPY-induced feeding in goldfish

The present study evaluated the effects of both intraperitoneal (i.p. ) and intracerebroventricular administration of selective Y(1) [(Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY] and Y(2) [(Pro(13), Tyr(36))-NPY (13-36)] receptor agonists on food intake in satiated goldfish. Food intake (FI) was significantly increased by central administration of the Y(1) agonist (1 microg), but not by the Y(2) agonist, at 2 h postinjection. The feeding increase induced by (Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY was in a similar magnitude to that obtained after ICV injection of the neuropeptide Y, and both feeding stimulations were reversed by the NPY (27-36), a general NPY antagonist. The i.p. administration of the agonists either did not significantly modify (Y(2) agonist) or decreased (Y(1) agonist) food intake in goldfish. These data indicate that it is the Y(1)-like (similar to Y(1) and/or Y(5)) receptor, and not Y(2), that is involved in the central modulation of the feeding behavior in goldfish. We also investigated the possible involvement of opioid peptides as mediators of the NPY stimulatory action on food intake in goldfish. The ICV administration of naloxone (10 microg), a general opioid antagonist, blocked the NPY-induced feeding in goldfish, suggesting that the opioidergic system is involved in feeding regulation by NPY.     

Long-Term Over-Expression of Neuropeptide Y in Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Contributes to Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance Partly via the Y5 Receptor

Intracerebroventricular injection and overexpression of Neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) has been shown to induce obesity and glucose metabolism disorder in rodents; however, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism contributing to glucose metabolic disturbance induced by NPY. Recombinant lentiviral NPY vectors were injected into the PVN of rats fed a high fat (HFD) or low-fat diet. 8 weeks later, in vivo intravenous glucose tolerance tests and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp revealed that insulin resistance of adipose tissue were induced by NPY overexpression with or without HFD. NPY increased food intake, but did not change blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or lipid levels. However, NPY decreased the expression of pGSK3β, PI3K p85 and pAKT^Ser473 in adipose tissue of rats. In vitro, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with NPY, NPY Y1 and Y5 receptor antagonists. Glucose consumption and 2-deoxy-D-[³H] glucose uptake were partly inhibited by NPY, while a decrease in PI3K-AKT pathway signaling and a decreased expression of pGSK3α and pGSK3β were observed. Nevertheless, a Y5 receptor antagonist (L-152,804) reversed the effects of NPY on glucose uptake and consumption. These data suggest that long-term over-expression of NPY in PVN contributes to the establishment of adipose tissue insulin resistance, at least partly via the Y5 Receptor.     

Self-regulation of agonist activity at the Y receptors

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant neuropeptides, and is likely to be present at nanomolar levels over extended periods in the synaptic space of many forebrain areas. This might be linked to an evolved generalized toning activity through a number of other peptide receptors that use C-terminally amidated agonists (with LHRH and orexin receptors and GIR as examples). However, the Y1 and Y2 receptors (which constitute the bulk of Y receptors active in the neural matrix) possess subnanomolar affinities that, at saturating NPY levels, could produce excessive signaling, as well as receptor losses via repeated endocytosis. The related Y4 receptor shows an even higher agonist affinity, and faces the same problem in visceral and neural locations accessible to pancreatic polypeptide (PP). An examination of agonist peptide interaction with Y receptors shows that Y1 and Y4 receptors in particular (as located on either the intact cells, or on particulates derived from various cell types) develop a blockade dependent on ligand concentration, with the blocking ranks of [NPY]>[peptide YY] (PYY) for the Y1, and [human PP]>[PYY-related Y4 agonist] for the Y4 receptor. This blockade is also echoed in a concentration-related reduction in biological activity of primary agonists (NPY and PP), resembling a partial agonism, and is influenced especially by the allosteric interactivity of agonists. With the Y2 receptor, the blocking by agonists is less pronounced, but the signaling by NPY-related peptides is apparently less than with PYY-related agonists. The extended occupancy and self-attenuation of primary agonist activity at Y receptors could represent an evolutionary solution contributing to a balancing of metabolic signaling, agonist clearance and receptor conservation.     

Regulation of Neuropeptide Y Release by Neuropeptide Y Receptor Ligands and Calcium Channel Antagonists in Hypothalamic Slices

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is an important regulator of energy balance in mammals through its orexigenic, antithermogenic, and insulin secretagogue actions. We investigated the regulation of endogenous NPY release from rat hypothalamic slices by NPY receptor ligands and calcium channel antagonists. High-potassium stimulation (60 mM) of the slices produced a calcium-dependent threefold increase in NPY release above basal release. The Y2 receptor agonists NPY(13-36) and N-acetyl[Leu28,Leu31]NPY(24-36), the Y4 agonist rat pancreatic polypeptide (rPP), and the Y4/Y5 agonist human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP) significantly reduced both basal and stimulated NPY release. NPY(13-36)-induced reduction of NPY release could be partially prevented in the presence of the weak Y2 antagonist T4-[NPY(33-36)]4, whereas the hPP- and rPP-induced inhibition of release was not affected by the Y5 antagonist CGP71683A or the Y1 antagonist BIBP3226. The selective Y1, Y2, and Y5 antagonists had no effect on either basal or potassium-stimulated release when administered alone. The calcium channel inhibitors omega-conotoxin GVIA (N-type), omega-agatoxin TK (P/Q-type), and omega-conotoxin MVIIC (Q-type) all significantly inhibited potassium-stimulated NPY release, without any effect on basal release, whereas nifedipine had no effect on either basal or stimulated release. Addition of both omega-conotoxin GVIA and omega-agatoxin TK together completely inhibited the potassium-stimulated release. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that NPY release from hypothalamic slices is calcium-dependent, involving N-, P-, and Q-type calcium channels. NPY release is also inhibited by Y2 agonists and rPP/hPP, suggesting that Y2 and Y4 receptors may act as autoreceptors on NPY-containing nerve terminals.     

Y2 receptors for neuropeptide Y in the nucleus of the solitary tract mediate depressor responses.

In anesthetized, spontaneously breathing rats, microinjections of selective agonists of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes were made into the medial region of the caudal nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) at the level of the area postrema. This region of the rat NTS exhibits very high densities of NPY binding sites. Microinjections of the long C-terminal NPY fragment, NPY(13-36), a selective agonist at Y2 receptors, into the caudal NTS elicited pronounced, dose-related reductions in blood pressure and respiratory minute volume. Moreover, the specific pattern of cardiorespiratory responses elicited by NPY(13-36) was remarkably similar, over approximately the same dosage range, with the cardiorespiratory response pattern elicited by intact NPY. In contrast to the potent NTS-mediated responses evoked by NPY(13-36), similar microinjections conducted with either NPY(26-36), an inactive C-terminal NPY fragment, or [Leu31,Pro34]NPY, a NPY analog with specific agonist properties at Y1 receptors, into the same caudal NTS sites did not appreciably affect cardiorespiratory parameters even at 10-20-fold higher dosages. The present results with selective agonists for NPY receptor subtypes suggest that the depressor responses and reductions in minute volume elicited by microinjections of intact NPY and NPY(13-36) were mediated by Y2 receptors in the caudal NTS, likely distributed at presynaptic sites in the medial region of the subpostremal NTS.     

Cardiorespiratory responses to intracerebroventricular injection of neuropeptide Y in anaesthetised dogs.

Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of neuropeptide Y (NPY) and separate, preferential agonists for NPY Y1 and Y2 receptors were observed in anaesthetised dogs. Central injections of NPY resulted in significant cardiac slowing and decreases in arterial pressure. These cardiovascular effects were blocked by central injection of the NPY Y1- preferring antagonist 1229U91. Central injection of NPY did not have a significant effect on ventilation, but the NPY Y1 antagonist 1229U91 administered alone caused a significant increase in ventilation. The NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreased ventilation while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24--36 significantly increased it. A similar inverse relationship was seen with respect to blood pressure, with the NPY Y1-receptor agonist [Leu31Pro34] NPY significantly decreasing blood pressure, while the NPY Y2 receptor agonist N-acetyl [Leu28Leu31] NPY 24-36 significantly increased it. These findings suggest a role for NPY Y1 receptors in pathways mediating decreases in ventilation and blood pressure, and for NPY Y2 receptors in those mediating increased ventilation and blood pressure.     

Energy Metabolic Profile of Mice after Chronic Activation of Central NPY Y1, Y2, or Y5 Receptors**

Objective: Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a 36‐amino acid peptide with orexigenic properties, is expressed abundantly in the central nervous system and binds to several NPY receptor subtypes. This study examines the roles of the NPY Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor(s) in energy homeostasis. Research Methods and Procedures: We administered intracerebroventricular NPY (3 μg/d) or selective peptide agonists for the Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor subtypes to C57Bl/6 mice for 6 days by mini‐osmotic pumps to assess the role of each receptor subtype in NPY‐induced obesity. Energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory quotient (RQ) were studied using indirect calorimetry. Adiposity was measured by DXA scanning and fat pad dissection. Insulin sensitivity was tested by whole‐blood glucose measurement after an insulin challenge. Results: Central administration of the selective Y1 agonist, Y5 agonist, or NPY for 6 days in mice significantly increased body weight, adiposity, and RQ, with significant hyperphagia in the Y5 agonist‐ and NPY‐treated groups but not in the Y1 agonist‐treated group. The NPY, Y1, or Y5 agonist‐treated mice had little change in total EE during ad libitum and pair‐feeding conditions. Conversely, selective activation of the Y2 receptor reduced feeding and resulted in a significant, but transient, weight loss. Discussion: Central activation of both Y1 and Y5 receptors increases RQ and adiposity, whereas only Y5 receptor activation reduces energy expended per energy ingested. Selective activation of Y2 autoreceptors leads to hypophagia and transient weight loss, with little effect on total EE. Our study indicates that all three NPY receptor subtypes may play a role in regulating energy homeostasis in mice.     

Neuropeptide Y Y5-receptor activation on breast cancer cells acts as a paracrine system that stimulates VEGF expression and secretion to promote angiogenesis

Accumulating data implicate a pathological role for sympathetic neurotransmitters like neuropeptide Y (NPY) in breast cancer progression. Our group and others reported that NPY promotes proliferation and migration in breast cancer cells, however the angiogenic potential of NPY in breast cancer is unknown. Herein we sought to determine if NPY promotes angiogenesis in vitro by increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and release from 4T1 breast cancer cells. Western blot analysis revealed that NPY treatment caused a 52 ± 14% increase in VEGF expression in the 4T1 cells compared to non-treated controls. Using selective NPY Y-receptor agonists (Y1R, Y2R and Y5R) we observed an increase in VEGF expression only when cells were treated with Y5R agonist. Congruently, using selective Y1R, Y2R, or Y5R antagonists, NPY-induced increases in VEGF expression in 4T1 cells were attenuated only under Y5R antagonism. Endothelial tube formation assays were conducted using conditioned media (CM) from NPY treated 4T1 cells. Concentration-dependent increases in number of branch points and complete endothelial networks were observed in HUVEC exposed to NPY CM. CM from Y5R agonist treated 4T1 cells caused similar increases in number of branch points and complete endothelial networks. VEGF concentration was quantified in CM (ELISA) from agonist experiments; we observed a 2-fold and 2.5-fold increase in VEGF release from NPY and Y5R agonist treated 4T1 cells respectively. Overall these data highlight a novel mechanism by which NPY may promote breast cancer progression, and further implicate a pathological role of the NPY Y5R.     

PYY preference is a common characteristic of neuropeptide Y receptors expressed in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal epithelia

This investigation describes the relative potencies of four peptide agonists, namely, peptide YY (PYY), [Leu3l,Pro34]PYY (Pro34pYY), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and [Leu31,Pro34]NPY (Pro34NPY), as antisecretory agents in human, rat, and mouse gastrointestinal preparations. The inhibition of agonist responses by the Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 was also tested in each preparation. An unexpectedly pronounced preference for PYY and Pro34PYY was observed in functional studies of two human epithelial lines stably transfected with the rat Y1 receptor (Y1-7 and C1Y1-6). NPY and Pro34NPY were at least an order of magnitude less effective than PYY in these functional studies but were only marginally less potent in displacement binding studies using membrane preparations of the same clonal lines. The orders of agonist potency obtained in Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia were compared with those obtained from a single human colonic adenocarcinoma cell line (Colony-6, which constitutively expresses Y1 receptors) and also from mucosal preparations of rat and mouse descending colon. Similar peptide orders of potency were obtained in rat and mouse colonic mucosae and Colony-6 epithelia, all of which exhibited PYY preference (although less pronounced than with Y1-7 and C1Y1-6 epithelia) and significant sensitivity to the Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP 3226. We have compared the pharmacology of these five mammalian epithelial preparations and provide cautionary evidence against the reliance upon agonist concentration-response relationships alone, in the characterization of NPY receptor types.     

Identification of selective neuropeptide Y2 peptide agonists

Activation of the NPY2 receptor to reduce appetite while avoiding stimulation of the NPY1 and NPY5 receptors that induce feeding provides a pharmaceutical approach to modulate food intake. The naturally occurring peptide PYY(3-36) is a nonselective NPY1, NPY2, and NPY5 agonist. N-terminal truncation of PYY to abrogate affinity for the NPY1 and NPY5 receptors and subsequent N-terminal modification with aminobenzoic analogs to restore NPY2 receptor potency results in a series of highly selective NPY2 receptor peptide agonists.     

NPY signaling through Y1 receptors modulates thalamic oscillations

Neuropeptide Y is the ligand of a family of G-protein coupled receptors (Y(1) to Y(6)). In the thalamus, exogenous and endogenously released NPY can shorten the duration of thalamic oscillations in brain slices from P13 to P15 rats, an in vitro model of absence seizures. Here, we examine which Y receptors are involved in this modulation. Application of the Y(1) receptor agonist Leu(31)Pro(34)NPY caused a reversible reduction in the duration of thalamic oscillations (-26.6+/-7.8%), while the Y(2) receptor agonist peptideYY((3-36)) and the Y(5) receptor agonist BWX-46 did not exert a significant effect. No Y receptor agonist affected oscillation period. Application of antagonists of Y(1), Y(2) and Y(5) receptors (BIBP3226, BIIE0246 and L152,806, respectively) produced results consistent with those obtained from agonists. BIBP3226 caused a reversible disinhibition, an effect that increases oscillation duration (18.2+/-9.7%) while BIIE0246 and L152,806 had no significant effect. Expression of NPY is limited to neurons in the reticular thalamic nucleus (nRt), but Y(1) receptors are expressed in both nRt and adjacent thalamic relay nuclei. Thus, intra-nRt or nRt to relay nucleus NPY release could cause Y(1) receptor mediated inhibition of thalamic oscillations.     

The novel neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptor antagonist J-104870: a potent feeding suppressant with oral bioavailability

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is known to induce robust feeding through the action of NPY receptors in the hypothalamus. Among the subtypes of NPY receptors, Y(1) receptors may play a key role in feeding regulation. In the present study, we demonstrated that a novel Y(1) antagonist, J-104870, shows high selectivity and potency for the Y(1) receptor with an anorexigenic effect on NPY-mediated feeding. J-104870 displaced [(125)I]peptide YY (PYY) binding to cloned human and rat Y(1) receptors with K(i) values of 0.29 and 0.54 nM, respectively, and inhibited the NPY (10 nM)-induced increase in intracellular calcium levels (IC(50) = 3.2 nM) in cells expressing human Y(1) receptors. In contrast, J-104870 showed low affinities for human Y(2) (K(i) > 10 microM), Y(4) (K(i) > 10 microM), and Y(5) receptors (K(i) = 6 microM). In rat hypothalamic membranes, J-104870 also completely displaced the binding of [(125)I]1229U91, which is known to bind to the typical Y(1) receptor, with a high affinity (K(i) = 2.0 nM). Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of J-104870 (200 microg) significantly suppressed NPY (5 microg)-induced feeding in satiated Sprague-Dawley rats by 74%. Furthermore, ICV and oral administration of J-104870 (200 microg and 100 mg/kg, respectively) significantly suppressed spontaneous food intake in Zucker fatty rats. These findings suggested that J-104870 is a selective and potent nonpeptide Y(1) antagonist with oral bioavailability and brain penetrability. In addition, the anorexigenic effect of J-104870 clearly revealed the participation of the Y(1) receptor in NPY-mediated feeding regulation. The potent and orally active Y(1) antagonist J-104970 is a useful tool for elucidating the physiological roles of NPY in obesity.