Cisplatin adducts inhibit 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine repair by interacting with the human 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase

The human 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) is a repair enzyme that removes a number of damaged bases from DNA, including adducts formed by some chemotherapeutic agents. Cisplatin is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs. Its success in killing tumor cells results from its ability to form DNA adducts and the cellular processes triggered by the presence of those adducts in DNA. Variations in tumor response to cisplatin may result from altered expression of cellular proteins that recognize cisplatin adducts. The present study focuses on the interaction between the cisplatin intrastrand cross-links and human AAG. Using site-specifically modified oligonucleotides containing each of the cisplatin intrastrand cross-links, we found that AAG readily recognized cisplatin adducts. The apparent dissociation constants for the 1, 2-d(GpG), the 1,2-d(ApG), and the 1,3-d(GpTpG) oligonucleotides were 115 nM, 71 nM, and 144 nM, respectively. For comparison, the apparent dissociation constant for an oligonucleotide containing a single 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (epsilonA), which is repaired efficiently by AAG, was 26 nM. Despite the affinity of AAG for cisplatin adducts, AAG was not able to release any of these adducts from DNA. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the presence of cisplatin adducts in the reactions inhibited the excision of epsilonA by AAG. These data suggest a previously unexplored dimension to the toxicological response of cells to cisplatin. We suggest that cisplatin adducts could titrate AAG away from its natural substrates, resulting in higher mutagenesis and/or cell death because of the persistence of AAG substrates in DNA.     

Differential human nucleotide excision repair of paired and mispaired cisplatin-DNA adducts.

In order to understand the action of the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin, it is necessary to determine why some types of cisplatin-DNA intrastrand crosslinks are repaired better than others. Using cell extracts and circular duplex DNA, we compared nucleotide excision repair of uniquely placed 1,2-GG, 1,2-AG, and 1,3-GTG cisplatin-crosslinks, and a 2-acetylaminofluorene lesion. The 1,3 crosslink and the acetylaminofluorene lesion were repaired by normal cell extracts approximately 15-20 fold better than the 1,2 crosslinks. No evidence was found for selective shielding of 1,2 cisplatin crosslinks from repair by cellular proteins. Fractionation of cell extracts to remove putative shielding proteins did not improve repair of the 1,2-GG crosslink, and cell extracts did not selectively inhibit access of UvrABC incision nuclease to 1,2-GG crosslinks. The poorer repair of 1,2 crosslinks in comparison to the 1,3 crosslink is more likely a consequence of different structural alterations of the DNA helix. In support of this, a 1,2-GG-cisplatin crosslink was much better repaired when it was opposite one or two non-complementary thymines. Extracts from cells defective in the hMutSalpha mismatch binding activity also showed preferential repair of the 1,3 crosslink over the 1,2 crosslink, and increased repair of the 1,2 adduct when opposite thymines, showing that hMutSalphais not involved in the differential NER of these substrates in vitro. Mismatched cisplatin adducts could arise by translesion DNA synthesis, and improved repair of such adducts could promote cisplatin-induced mutagenesis in some cases.     

Walker rat carcinoma cells are exceptionally sensitive to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cisplatin) and other difunctional agents but not defective in the removal of platinum-DNA adducts

Cisplatin binds to cellular macromolecules (DNA, RNA and protein) to the same extent in wild-type Walker rat carcinoma cells and a variant sub-line of these cells resistant to cisplatin and to other difunctional, but not monofunctional cytotoxic agents. Wild-type Walker cells exhibit a unique sensitivity to DNA-bound cisplatin, while the resistant cells have a sensitivity that approximates to that of many normal and other tumour cell lines. Total DNA-bound adducts were lost from both sensitive and resistant Walker cells at similar rates. Equal numbers of DNA interstrand crosslinks and DNA-protein crosslinks were formed in both cell lines, and the rate of loss of both types of crosslinks was similar in the two lines. Therefore the unusual sensitivity of Walker cells to cisplatin is not due to a defect in their ability to remove these platinum-DNA adducts.     

Binding discrimination of MutS to a set of lesions and compound lesions (base damage and mismatch) reveals its potential role as a cisplatin-damaged DNA sensing protein

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system plays a critical role in sensitizing both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells to the clinically potent anticancer drug cisplatin. It is thought to mediate cytotoxicity through recognition of cisplatin DNA lesions. This drug generates a range of lesions that may also give rise to compound lesions resulting from the misincorporation of a base during translesion synthesis. Using gel mobility shift competition assays and surface plasmon resonance, we have analyzed the interaction of Escherichia coli MutS protein with site-specifically modified DNA oligonucleotides containing each of the four cisplatin cross-links or a set of compound lesions. The major 1,2-d(GpG) cisplatin intrastrand cross-link was recognized with only a 1.5-fold specificity, whereas a 47-fold specificity was found with a natural G/T containing DNA substrate. The rate of association, kon, for binding to the 1,2-d(GpG) adduct was 3.1 x 104 m-1 s-1 and the specificity of binding was essentially dependent on koff. DNA duplexes containing a single 1,2-d(ApG), 1,3-d(GpCpG) adduct, and an interstrand cross-link of cisplatin were not preferentially recognized. Among 12 DNA substrates, each containing a different cisplatin compound lesion derived from replicative misincorporation of one base opposite either of the 1,2-intrastrand adducts, 10 were specifically recognized including those that are more likely formed in vivo based on cisplatin mutation spectra. Moreover, among these lesions, two compound lesions formed when an adenine was misincorporated opposite a 1,2-d(GpG) adduct were not substrates for the MutY-dependent mismatch repair pathway. The ability of MutS to sense differentially various platinated DNA substrates suggests that cisplatin compound lesions formed during misincorporation of a base opposite either adducted base of both 1,2-intrastrand cross-links are more plausible critical lesions for MMR-mediated cisplatin cytotoxicity.     

Adduct-specific monoclonal antibodies for the measurement of cisplatin-induced DNA lesions in individual cell nuclei

The anticancer drug cisplatin executes its cytotoxic activity via formation of intra- and interstrand crosslinks in DNA. The relative contribution of structurally defined cisplatin adducts to induce apoptosis and the cellular processing of these lesions is still poorly understood mostly due to the lack of sensitive analytical tools for in vivo studies. Here we describe a new method to establish and characterize monoclonal antibodies (Mab) for structurally defined DNA adducts. The two major reaction products of cisplatin, the guanine–guanine (Pt-[GG]) and adenine–guanine (Pt-[AG]) intrastrand crosslinks are recognized by Mab R-C18 and R-B3, respectively. Both antibodies were employed in an immuno-cytological assay allowing the quantification of drug-induced lesions in individual cell nuclei at clinically relevant doses. Analyzing various tissues of cisplatin-treated C57Bl/6 mice the accumulation of Pt-(GG) was highest in kidney tubular cells compared with 30, 50 and 90% lower levels in kidney stroma, liver and peripheral blood cells, respectively. Adduct kinetics revealed that wild type mouse cells remove up to 80% of the crosslinks in contrast to their complete persistence in nucleotide excision repair-deficient (XPC^−/−) mice. The aptitude of the immunoassay for human molecular dosimetry studies was demonstrated by measuring adduct levels in tumor biopsies from patients treated with cisplatin.     

Differential recognition by the tumor suppressor protein p53 of DNA modified by the novel antitumor trinuclear platinum drug BBR3464 and cisplatin

The trinuclear platinum agent BBR3464, a representative of a new class of anticancer drugs, is more potent than conventional mononuclear cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)]. BBR3464 retains significant activity in human tumor cell lines and xenografts that are refractory or poorly responsive to cisplatin, and displays a high activity in human tumor cell lines that are characterized by both wild-type and mutant p53 gene. In contrast, on average, cells with mutant p53 are more resistant to the effect of cisplatin. It has been hypothesized that the sensitivity or resistance of tumor cells to cisplatin might be also associated with cell cycle control and repair processes that involve p53. DNA is a major pharmacological target of platinum compounds and DNA binding activity of the p53 protein is crucial for its tumor suppressor function. This study, using gel-mobility-shift assays, was undertaken to examine the interactions of active and latent p53 protein with DNA fragments and oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes modified by BBR3464 in a cell free medium and to compare these results with those describing the interactions of these proteins with DNA modified by cisplatin. The results indicate that structurally different DNA adducts of BBR3464 and cisplatin exhibit a different efficiency to affect the binding affinity of the modified DNA to p53 protein. It has been suggested that different structural perturbations induced in DNA by the adducts of BBR3464 and cisplatin produce a differential response to p53 protein activation and recognition and that a 'molecular approach' to control of downstream effects such as protein recognition and pathways of apoptosis induction may consist in design of structurally unique DNA adducts as cell signals.     

Different recognition of DNA modified by aatitumor cisplatin and its clinically ineffective trans isomer by tumor suppressor protein p53

The p53 gene encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein that is biologically activated in response to genotoxic stresses including treatment with anticancer platinum drugs. The DNA binding activity of p53 protein is crucial for its tumor suppressor function. DNA interactions of active wild-type human p53 protein with DNA fragments and oligodeoxyribonucleotide duplexes modified by antitumor cisplatin and its clinically ineffective trans isomer (transplatin) were investigated by using a gel mobility shift assay. It was found that DNA adducts of cisplatin reduced binding affinity of the consensus DNA sequence to p53, whereas transplatin adducts did not. This result was interpreted to mean that the precise steric fit required for the formation and stability of the tetrameric complex of p53 with the consensus sequence cannot be attained, as a consequence of severe conformational perturbations induced in DNA by cisplatin adducts. The results also demonstrate an increase of the binding affinity of p53 to DNA lacking the consensus sequence and modified by cisplatin but not by transplatin. In addition, only major 1,2-GG intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin are responsible for this enhanced binding affinity of p53. The data base on structures of various DNA adducts of cisplatin and transplatin reveals distinctive structural features of 1,2-intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin, suggesting a unique role for this adduct in the binding of p53 to DNA lacking the consensus sequence. The results support the hypothesis that the mechanism of antitumor activity of cisplatin may also be associated with its efficiency to affect the binding affinity of platinated DNA to active p53 protein.     

Interaction of novel bis(platinum) complexes with DNA.

Bis(platinum) complexes [[cis-PtCl2(NH3)]2H2N(CH2)nNH2] are a novel series of potential anticancer agents in which two cis-diamine(platinum) groups are linked by an alkyldiamine of variable length. These complexes are potentially tetrafunctional, a unique feature in comparison with known anticancer agents. Studies of DNA interactions of bis(platinum) complexes in comparison with cisplatin demonstrate significant differences. Investigations of interstrand crosslink formation in which crosslinking of a short DNA fragment is detected by gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions demonstrate that interstrand crosslinks are 250 fold more frequent among bis(platinum) adducts than among cisplatin-derived adducts under the conditions examined. These investigations indicate that bis(platinum) adducts contain a high frequency of structurally novel interstrand crosslinks formed through binding of the two platinum centers to opposite DNA strands. Unlike cisplatin, bis(platinum) complex binding does not unwind supercoiled DNA. Studies with the E. coli UvrABC nuclease complex demonstrate that both linear and supercoiled DNA containing bis(platinum) adducts are subject to incision by the repair enzyme complex. Initial studies using UvrABC nuclease as a probe to define the base and sequence specificity for bis(platinum) complex binding suggest that the specificity of the bis(platinum)s is similar, but not identical, to that of cisplatin.     

Removal of psoralen monoadducts and crosslinks by human cell free extracts.

Human cell free extracts are capable of carrying out damage-induced DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage by UV, psoralen, and cisplatin. We show that this damage-induced DNA synthesis is associated with removal of psoralen adducts and therefore is 'repair synthesis' and not an aberrant DNA synthesis reaction potentiated by DNA deformed by adducts. By comparing the denaturable fraction of psoralen adducted DNA which becomes labeled in the repair reaction to that of terminally labeled DNA (without repair) we have found that all DNA synthesis induced by psoralen monoadducts is the consequence of removal of these adducts. By the same approach we have obtained preliminary evidence that this in vitro system is capable of removing psoralen crosslinks as well.     

Mechanism of the formation of DNA-protein cross-links by antitumor cisplatin

DNA–protein cross-links are formed by various DNA-damaging agents including antitumor platinum drugs. The natures of these ternary DNA–Pt–protein complexes (DPCLs) can be inferred, yet much remains to be learned about their structures and mechanisms of formation. We investigated the origin of these DPCLs and their cellular processing on molecular level using gel electrophoresis shift assay. We show that in cell-free media cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II)] forms DPCLs more effectively than ineffective transplatin [trans-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II)]. Mechanisms of transformation of individual types of plain DNA adducts of the platinum complexes into the DPCLs in the presence of several DNA-binding proteins have been also investigated. The DPCLs are formed by the transformation of DNA monofunctional and intrastrand cross-links of cisplatin. In contrast, interstrand cross-links of cisplatin and monofunctional adducts of transplatin are stable in presence of the proteins. The DPCLs formed by cisplatin inhibit DNA polymerization or removal of these ternary lesions from DNA by nucleotide excision repair system more effectively than plain DNA intrastrand or monofunctional adducts. Thus, the bulky DNA–protein cross-links formed by cisplatin represent a more distinct and persisting structural motif recognized by the components of downstream cellular systems processing DNA damage considerably differently than the plain DNA adducts of this metallodrug.     

Thermodynamic properties of duplex DNA containing a site-specific d(GpG) intrastrand crosslink formed by an antitumor dinuclear platinum complex

Bifunctional polynuclear platinum compounds represent a novel class of metal-based antitumor drugs which are currently undergoing preclinical development. A typical agent is [(trans-PtCl(NH(3))(2))(2)H(2)N(CH(2))(4)NH(2)]Cl(2) (1,1/t,t), which coordinates to bases in DNA and forms various types of covalent crosslinks. It also forms a 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand adduct, the equivalent of the major DNA lesion of 'classical' cisplatin. In the present study differential scanning calorimetry and spectroscopic techniques were employed to characterize the influence of this crosslink on the thermal stability and energetics of 20 bp DNA duplexes site-specifically modified by 1,1/t,t. Thermal denaturation data revealed that the crosslink of 1,1/t,t reduced thermal and thermodynamical stability of the duplex noticeably more than that of 'classical' cisplatin. The energetic consequences of the intrastrand crosslink at the d(GG) site are discussed in relation to the structural distortions induced by this adduct in DNA and to its recognition and binding by HMG domain proteins. It has been suggested that the results of the present work are consistent with different DNA binding modes of cisplatin and polynuclear bifunctional DNA-binding drugs, which might be relevant to their distinct biological effectiveness.     

Protein interactions with platinum-DNA adducts: from structure to function

Because of the efficacy of cisplatin and carboplatin in a wide variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, hundreds of platinum(II) and platinum(IV) complexes have been synthesized and evaluated as anticancer agents over the past 30 years. Of the many third generation platinum compounds evaluated to date, only oxaliplatin has been approved for clinical usage in the United States. Thus, it is important to understand the mechanistic basis for the differences in efficacy, mutagenicity and tumor range between cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Cisplatin and oxaliplain form the same types of adducts at the same sites on DNA. The most abundant adduct for both compounds is the Pt-GG intrastrand diadduct. Cisplatin-GG adducts are preferentially recognized by mismatch repair proteins and some damage-recognition proteins, and this differential recognition of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts is thought to contribute to the differences in cytotoxicity and tumor range of cisplatin and oxaliplatin. A detailed kinetic analysis of the insertion and extension steps of dNTP incorporation in the vicinity of the adduct shows that both pol beta and pol eta catalyze translesion synthesis past oxaliplatin-GG adducts with greater efficiency than past cisplatin-GG adducts. In the case of pol eta, the efficiency and fidelity of translesion synthesis in vitro is very similar to that previously observed with cyclobutane TT dimers, suggesting that pol eta is likely to be involved in error-free bypass of Pt adducts in vivo. This has been confirmed for cisplatin by comparing the cisplatin-induced mutation frequency in human fibroblast cell lines with and without pol eta. Thus, the greater efficiency of bypass of oxaliplatin-GG adducts by pol eta is likely to explain the lower mutagenicity of oxaliplatin compared to cisplatin. The ability of these cellular proteins to discriminate between cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts suggest that there exist significant conformational differences between the adducts, yet the crystal structures of the cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-GG adducts were very similar. We have recently solved the solution structure of the oxaliplatin-GG adduct and have shown that it is significantly different from the previously published solution structures of the cisplatin-GG adducts. Furthermore, the observed differences in conformation provide a logical explanation for the differential recognition of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by mismatch repair and damage-recognition proteins. Molecular modeling studies are currently underway to analyze the mechanistic basis for the differential bypass of cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by DNA polymerases.     

Plasmodium falciparum: DNA sequence specificity of cisplatin and cisplatin analogues

In this paper, we provided evidence that cisplatin is able to form adducts with cellular DNA in Plasmodium falciparum. The DNA sequence specificity of cisplatin adduct formation was determined in trophozoite-enriched P. falciparum cells and this paper represents the first occasion that the sequence specificity of cisplatin DNA damage has been observed in malaria cells. Utilising a sub-telomeric, 692 bp repeat sequence in the P. falciparum genome, we were able to investigate the DNA adducts formed by cisplatin and five analogues. A run of eight consecutive guanines was the most prominent site of DNA damage in the malarial cells. This study suggests that the mechanism of P. falciparum cell death caused by cisplatin involves damage to DNA and hence inhibition of DNA replication and cell division.