Evidence for Translational Regulation by the Herpes Simplex Virus Virion Host Shutoff Protein

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by gene UL41 is an mRNA-specific RNase that triggers accelerated degradation of host and viral mRNAs in infected cells. We report here that vhs is also able to modulate reporter gene expression without greatly altering the levels of the target mRNA in transient-transfection assays conducted in HeLa cells. We monitored the effects of vhs on a panel of bicistronic reporter constructs bearing a variety of internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) located between two test cistrons. As expected, vhs inhibited the expression of the 5′ cistrons of all of these constructs; however, the response of the 3′ cistron varied with the IRES: expression driven from the wild-type EMCV IRES was strongly suppressed, while expression controlled by a mutant EMCV IRES and the cellular ApaF1, BiP, and DAP5 IRES elements was strongly activated. In addition, several HSV type 1 (HSV-1) 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) sequences also served as positive vhs response elements in this assay. IRES activation was also observed in 293 and HepG2 cells, but no such response was observed in Vero cells. Mutational analysis has yet to uncouple the ability of vhs to activate 3′ cistron expression from its shutoff activity. Remarkably, repression of 5′ cistron expression could be observed under conditions where the levels of the reporter RNA were not correspondingly reduced. These data provide strong evidence that vhs can modulate gene expression at the level of translation and that it is able to activate cap-independent translation through specific cis-acting elements.The virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by herpes simplex virus (HSV) gene UL41 is an endoribonuclease that is packaged into the tegument of mature HSV virions. Once delivered into the cytoplasm of newly infected cells, vhs triggers shutoff of host protein synthesis, disruption of preexisting polysomes, and degradation of host mRNAs (reviewed in reference 62). The vhs-dependent shutoff system destabilizes many cellular and viral mRNAs (36, 46, 67). The rapid decline in host mRNA levels presumably helps viral mRNAs gain access to the cellular translational apparatus. In addition, the relatively short half-lives of viral mRNAs contribute to the sharp transitions between the successive phases of viral protein synthesis by tightly coupling changes in the rates of synthesis of viral mRNAs to altered mRNA levels (46). These effects enhance virus replication and may account for the modest reduction in virus yield displayed by vhs mutants in cultured Vero cells (55, 61).vhs also plays a critical role in HSV pathogenesis: vhs mutants are severely impaired for replication in the corneas and central nervous systems of mice and cannot efficiently establish or reactivate from latency (63, 65, 66). Mounting evidence indicates that this attenuation stems at least in part from an impaired ability to disarm elements of the innate and adaptive host immune responses (reviewed in reference 62). For example, vhs suppresses certain innate cellular antiviral responses, including production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (68); dampens the type I interferon system (11, 45, 49, 78); and blocks activation of dendritic cells (58). Moreover, vhs mutants display enhanced virulence in knockout mice lacking type I interferon (IFN) receptors (37, 45) or Stat1 (48) and are hypersensitive to the antiviral effects of IFN in some cells in tissue culture (11, 49, 68). Thus, vhs is arguably a bona fide virulence factor.vhs present in extracts of HSV virions or purified from bacteria has nonspecific RNase activity capable of degrading all RNA substrates (15, 70, 71, 79). However, vhs is highly selective in vivo, targeting mRNAs and sparing other cytoplasmic RNAs (36, 46). In vivo and in mammalian whole-cell extracts, vhs-induced decay of at least some mRNAs initiates near regions of translation initiation and proceeds in an overall 5′-to-3′ direction (12, 13, 29, 52). Moreover, vhs binds to the translation initiation factors eIF4H, eIF4B, and eIF4A II, all components of the cap recognition factor eIF4F (10, 16, 17). Thus, it has been proposed that vhs selectively targets actively translated mRNAs through interactions with eIF4F components (17). Consistent with this hypothesis, recent data document that eIF4H is required for vhs activity in vivo (59).A previous report from this laboratory documented that the internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) of the picornaviruses poliovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) strongly target vhs-induced RNA cleavage events to sequences immediately 3′ to the IRES in an in vitro translation system derived from rabbit reticulocyte lysates (RRL) (13). IRES elements are highly structured RNA sequences that are able to direct cap-independent translational initiation (reviewed in references 21, 25, 30, and 64). In the case of the poliovirus and EMCV elements, this is achieved by directly recruiting the eIF4F scaffolding protein eIF4G, thus bypassing the requirement for the cap-binding eIF4F subunit, eIF4E (reviewed in reference 30). Based on these data, we suggested that vhs is strongly targeted to the picornavirus IRES elements via interactions with eIF4 factors.A growing number of cellular mRNAs have been proposed to bear IRES elements in their 5′ untranslated regions (5′ UTRs). These include many that are involved in cellular stress responses, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression (24, 64, 74). Given the striking ability of picornavirus IRES elements to target vhs RNase activity in vitro, we asked whether viral and cellular IRES elements are able to modify the susceptibility of mRNAs to vhs in vivo. During the course of preliminary experiments designed to test this hypothesis, we unexpectedly discovered that vhs is able to strongly activate gene expression controlled by some cellular IRES elements and HSV 5′ UTR sequences in in vivo bicistronic reporter assays. These observations are the subject of the present report.     

Nucleotide Variability and Translation Efficiency of the 5′ Untranslated Region of Hepatitis A Virus: Update from Clinical Isolates Associated with Mild and Severe Hepatitis

Mutations in the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of hepatitis A virus (HAV) have been associated with enhanced in vitro replication and viral attenuation in animal models. To address the possible role of IRES variability in clinical presentation, IRES sequences were obtained from HAV isolates associated with benign (n = 8) or severe (n = 4) hepatitis. IRES activity was assessed using a bicistronic dual-luciferase expression system in adenocarcinoma (HeLa) and hepatoma (HuH7) cell lines. Activity was higher in HuH7 than in HeLa cells, except for an infrequently isolated genotype IIA strain. Though globally low, significant variation in IRES-dependent translation efficiency was observed between field isolates, reflecting the low but significant genetic variability of this region (94.2% ± 0.5% nucleotide identity). No mutation was exclusive of benign or severe hepatitis, and variations in IRES activity were not associated with a clinical phenotype, indirectly supporting the preponderance of host factors in determining the clinical presentation.Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a nonenveloped RNA virus of the Picornaviridae family. The viral genome consists of an approximately 7,500-nucleotide (nt)-long, positive-stranded RNA divided in three parts: a 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR), a single open reading frame that encodes both structural and nonstructural proteins, and a 3′ UTR with a short poly(A) tail. By sequencing of the VP1-2A junction and the VP1 gene, 3 genotypes (I, II, and III) divided into A and B subtypes have been described in humans (7, 27). HAV is the main cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide. The majority of cases follow a benign course, but some may be present with fulminant forms, characterized by acute liver failure (factor V levels of <50% and encephalopathy). HAV-induced liver disease appears to result primarily from immunologic mechanisms, chiefly on the basis of in vitro studies. Most HAV strains have no detectable cytopathic effect in cell culture and no apparent effect on cell growth or metabolism (16), and HAV-infected cells are lysed by cytotoxic T cells isolated from the liver of acutely infected patients (30, 31). Clinical studies have suggested that host factors such as age and underlying liver disease were involved in the severity of liver diseases (32, 33) and that the host immune response also played a role in the fulminant forms of hepatitis A, as evidenced by markedly low viral loads (26).Nevertheless, the existence of viral determinants of hepatitis A severity is suggested by both experimental and clinical studies. Indeed, mutations within the VP1-2A and 2C genes have been shown to enhance virulence in tamarins (9). It has also been suggested that 5′ UTR mutations associated with viral adaptation to cell culture were also responsible for viral attenuation in vivo (15). The 5′ UTR of HAV is about 735 nucleotides long and is considered the most conserved region of the genome. The 5′ UTR is involved in genome replication and translation initiation. Folding predictions and biochemical probing showed that this region forms a highly ordered secondary structure containing a pyrimidine-rich tract (PRT) and an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) with 10 to 12 AUG triplets upstream of the initiator codon (18). The IRES allows the initiation of the cap-independent translation of the viral genome. Most knowledge of HAV IRES activity is derived from studies of the HM-175 reference strain and its cell culture-adapted variants (4, 5, 36). These experiments have shown that HAV presents the lowest IRES-dependent translation initiation activity among picornaviruses both in reticulocyte lysates and in a variety of cell lines, including the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 (type III IRES) (3, 6). These features have been attributed to a lower affinity of the HAV 5′ UTR for translation factors (6). The hypothesis that the slow growth of HAV in cell culture could be related to this inefficient translation is supported by the emergence of 5′ UTR mutations in cell culture-adapted variants with enhanced viral replication (8). The finding that these mutations were associated with viral attenuation in vivo supports the hypothesis of viral determinants of virulence in the 5′ UTR (15). Among the few clinical studies which have addressed this question, Fujiwara et al., by comparing full-length HAV genomes obtained from Japanese patients with benign or fulminant hepatitis, found less nucleotide variation in the 5′ UTRs from patients with fulminant hepatitis (12, 13) and suggested that two IRES mutations (G324A and C372G/T) might influence the course of HAV infection (14).The aim of the present study was to further examine the genetic variability of 5′ UTR sequences from field isolates, to assess the potential impact of nucleotide variations on IRES activity by using validated techniques, and to search for a relationship with disease severity by comparing isolates obtained from patients with benign or fulminant forms of hepatitis A.     

3′ cis-Acting Elements That Contribute to the Competence and Efficiency of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genome Replication: Functional Importance of Sequence Duplications,Deletions, and Substitutions

The positive-strand RNA genome of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) terminates in a highly conserved 3′-noncoding region (3′NCR) of six domains (V, X, I, II-1, II-2, and III in the 5′-to-3′ direction). By manipulating the JEV genomic RNA, we have identified important roles for RNA elements present within the 574-nucleotide 3′NCR in viral replication. The two 3′-proximal domains (II-2 and III) were sufficient for RNA replication and virus production, whereas the remaining four (V, X, I, and II-1) were dispensable for RNA replication competence but required for maximal replication efficiency. Surprisingly, a lethal mutant lacking all of the 3′NCR except domain III regained viability through pseudoreversion by duplicating an 83-nucleotide sequence from the 3′-terminal region of the viral open reading frame. Also, two viable mutants displayed severe genetic instability; these two mutants rapidly developed 12 point mutations in domain II-2 in the mutant lacking domains V, X, I, and II-1 and showed the duplication of seven upstream sequences of various sizes at the junction between domains II-1 and II-2 in the mutant lacking domains V, X, and I. In all cases, the introduction of these spontaneous mutations led to an increase in RNA production that paralleled the level of protein accumulation and virus yield. Interestingly, the mutant lacking domains V, X, I, and II-1 was able to replicate in hamster BHK-21 and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells but not in mosquito C6/36 cells, indicating a cell type-specific restriction of its viral replication. Thus, our findings provide the basis for a detailed map of the 3′ cis-acting elements in JEV genomic RNA, which play an essential role in viral replication. They also provide experimental evidence for the function of 3′ direct repeat sequences and suggest possible mechanisms for the emergence of these sequences in the 3′NCR of JEV and perhaps in other flaviviruses.Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), a mosquito-borne flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae, is serologically related to several significant human pathogens, including West Nile virus (WNV), Kunjin virus (KUNV), St. Louis encephalitis virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. It is also phylogenetically close to other clinically important human pathogens, including yellow fever virus (YFV) and dengue virus (DENV) (11, 67). JEV is the leading cause of viral encephalitis in Southeast Asia, including China, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and India, and it has begun to expand throughout the Indonesian archipelago and as far as Australia (21, 43). Despite the fact that JEV is generally asymptomatic, ∼50,000 cases are reported annually, and the disease has a mortality rate of ∼25%, mainly in children and young adults (29, 63). Thus, the geographic expansion and clinical importance of JEV infection have drawn increasing attention from the international public health community (44, 71).Like other flaviviruses, JEV is a spherical enveloped virus (∼50 nm diameter) with a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome that contains a 5′ cap structure but lacks a 3′ polyadenylated tail. Its genomic RNA of ∼11,000 nucleotides (nt) consists of a single long open reading frame (ORF) with two noncoding regions (NCRs) at the 5′ and 3′ ends (41, 84). The ORF is translated into an ∼3,400-amino acid polyprotein precursor, which is co- or posttranslationally cleaved by a cellular protease(s) or a viral protease complex into 10 mature proteins: (i) three structural proteins, the capsid (C), premembrane (prM; which is further processed into pr and M), and envelope (E) proteins; and (ii) seven nonstructural proteins, NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5, as arranged in the genome (13, 41, 84). The nonstructural proteins, together with cellular factors, form a viral replicase complex that directs the replication of the genomic RNA in the cytoplasm of the host cell in association with perinuclear membranes (40, 74). For the synthesis of the genomic RNA to take place, this replicase complex must specifically recognize viral cis-acting RNA elements, defined by primary sequences or secondary/tertiary structures. These RNA elements are found in various locations within the genome but most frequently are located in the 5′- and 3′NCRs (23, 47). The identification and characterization of these cis-acting RNA elements is critical for understanding the complete cycle of JEV genome replication.The availability of the complete nucleotide sequence of YFV genomic RNA (57) has led to the identification of three major conserved elements in the 5′- and 3′-terminal regions of the genomic RNA that contain the short primary sequences and secondary structures required for flavivirus RNA replication. (i) Both ends of the genomic RNA terminate with the conserved dinucleotides 5′-AG and CU-3′ (9, 10, 32, 45, 57, 72, 73) in all flaviviruses except an insect cell fusing agent virus (12). Mutations substituting another nucleotide for one of these four nucleotides in KUNV or WNV replicon RNA are known to abolish or compromise RNA replication (35, 69). (ii) A 3′ stem-loop structure (3′SL) has been recognized in all flaviviruses within the ∼90-nt 3′-terminal region of the genomic RNA (9, 45, 57). The structural and functional importance of this 3′SL in RNA replication has been demonstrated in several flaviviruses (9, 18, 49, 50, 61, 70, 82, 86). (iii) The presence of short 5′ and 3′ cyclization sequences (5′CYC and 3′CYC, respectively) in all mosquito-borne flaviviruses suggests that flavivirus genomes can cyclize via 5′-3′ long-range base-pairing interaction, since the 3′CYC upstream of the 3′SL is complementary to the 5′CYC in the 5′ coding region of the C protein (30). The role of these CYC motifs in RNA replication has been well characterized via cell-based assays in many mosquito-borne flaviviruses, including KUNV (34), WNV (42), YFV (8, 14), and DENV (2, 22, 49), and in cell-free systems in the case of WNV (51) and DENV (1, 3, 79, 80). Other RNA elements that have recently been shown to be important for RNA replication in DENV and WNV include an additional pair of complementary sequences (designated 5′- and 3′UARs) that participate in genome cyclization (3, 4, 17, 87) and a 5′ stem-loop structure (designated 5′SLA) present within the 5′NCR that promotes RNA synthesis in association with the 3′NCR (22).In all flaviviruses, the 3′NCR of the genomic RNA is relatively long (∼400 to ∼800 nt), with an array of conserved primary sequences and secondary structures. Although significant progress has been made in identifying cis-acting elements within the 3′NCRs that are essential for RNA replication, most of these elements (i.e., the 3′CYC, 3′SL, and CU-3′) are limited to the ∼100-nt 3′-terminal region that is highly conserved in these viruses (see recent reviews in references 23 and 47). However, the functional importance of the remaining 5′-proximal region of the 3′NCR, which differs in sequence between the various serological groups, is poorly understood. In particular, comparative sequence analyses and genetic algorithm-based computer modeling have suggested that in addition to the well-studied ∼100-nt 3′-proximal region, the remaining ∼474-nt 5′-proximal region of the 574-nt JEV 3′NCR also contains several RNA elements that may play critical roles in the viral life cycle (52, 55, 56, 68). To date, however, experimental evidence for the functional importance of these potential RNA elements in JEV genomic RNA replication is lacking.In the present study, we have identified and characterized the 3′ cis-acting RNA elements within the JEV 3′NCR and shown that they play an essential and/or regulatory role in genomic RNA replication. In particular, we have constructed and functionally characterized genome-length JEV mutant cDNAs with a series of 5′-to-3′ or 3′-to-5′ progressive deletions within the 3′NCR. In addition to identifying particular mutations within this region that affect either the competence or efficiency of genomic RNA replication, we found that the serial passaging of these mutants in susceptible BHK-21 cells produced a large number of pseudorevertants bearing a wide variety of spontaneous point mutations and sequence duplications, some of which were capable of restoring the replication competence of the defective mutants or enhancing replication efficiency. In addition, we assessed the replication of these mutants in three different cell types (BHK-21, SH-SY5Y, and C6/36 cells). Collectively, these data offer new insights into the functional importance of 3′ cis-acting RNA elements that regulate the cell type-dependent replication of JEV and perhaps other closely related mosquito-borne flaviviruses. Our findings also provide experimental evidence for the emergence of functional 3′ direct repeat sequences that are duplicated from the coding region and 3′NCR of JEV genomic RNA.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Replacement of the Replication Factors of Porcine Circovirus (PCV) Type 2 with Those of PCV Type 1 Greatly Enhances Viral Replication In Vitro

Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1), originally isolated as a contaminant of PK-15 cells, is nonpathogenic, whereas porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) causes an economically important disease in pigs. To determine the factors affecting virus replication, we constructed chimeric viruses by swapping open reading frame 1 (ORF1) (rep) or the origin of replication (Ori) between PCV1 and PCV2 and compared the replication efficiencies of the chimeric viruses in PK-15 cells. The results showed that the replication factors of PCV1 and PCV2 are fully exchangeable and, most importantly, that both the Ori and rep of PCV1 enhance the virus replication efficiencies of the chimeric viruses with the PCV2 backbone.Porcine circovirus (PCV) is a single-stranded DNA virus in the family Circoviridae (34). Type 1 PCV (PCV1) was discovered in 1974 as a contaminant of porcine kidney cell line PK-15 and is nonpathogenic in pigs (31-33). Type 2 PCV (PCV2) was discovered in piglets with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in the mid-1990s and causes porcine circovirus-associated disease (PCVAD) (1, 9, 10, 25). PCV1 and PCV2 have similar genomic organizations, with two major ambisense open reading frames (ORFs) (16). ORF1 (rep) encodes two viral replication-associated proteins, Rep and Rep′, by differential splicing (4, 6, 21, 22). The Rep and Rep′ proteins bind to specific sequences within the origin of replication (Ori) located in the intergenic region, and both are responsible for viral replication (5, 7, 8, 21, 23, 28, 29). ORF2 (cap) encodes the immunogenic capsid protein (Cap) (26). PCV1 and PCV2 share approximately 80%, 82%, and 62% nucleotide sequence identity in the Ori, rep, and cap, respectively (19).In vitro studies using a reporter gene-based assay system showed that the replication factors of PCV1 and PCV2 are functionally interchangeable (2-6, 22), although this finding has not yet been validated in a live infectious-virus system. We have previously shown that chimeras of PCV in which cap has been exchanged between PCV1 and PCV2 are infectious both in vitro and in vivo (15), and an inactivated vaccine based on the PCV1-PCV2 cap (PCV1-cap2) chimera is used in the vaccination program against PCVAD (13, 15, 18, 27).PCV1 replicates more efficiently than PCV2 in PK-15 cells (14, 15); thus, we hypothesized that the Ori or rep is directly responsible for the differences in replication efficiencies. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate that the Ori and rep are interchangeable between PCV1 and PCV2 in a live-virus system and to determine the effects of swapped heterologous replication factors on virus replication efficiency in vitro.