A new,liquid-based cytology technique

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new liquid-based cytology technique, Papspin (Thermo Shandon, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.). STUDY DESIGN: Three thousand cervical samples were examined. Each cervix was sampled with a Cervex Brush (Roche, Oss, the Netherlands), used first for a Pap smear and afterwards for a Papspin. One cytospin was prepared from each vial. RESULTS: An identical rate of epithelial cell abnormalities (3.8%) was detected with the two methods. Diagnostic concordance was observed in 86% of the 114 cases. Differences in diagnoses occurred in 168 of 3,000 cases (5.6%) concerning fungal infection (22 cases), epithelial cell abnormalities (24 cases) and minimal differences within the nonneoplastic Bethesda category (122 cases). Endocervical cells were absent from 158 Papspins (5.3%) and 66 Pap smears (2.2%), while they were present in the respective Pap smear or Papspin. Seven Papspins were considered "satisfactory, but limited by ..." (SBLB) as compared to 33 Pap smears given the absence of endocervical cells. CONCLUSION: Discordances concerning epithelial cell abnormalities were observed in 24 of 3,000 cases (0.8%). Fungal infections were more easily diagnosed on Papspin. The absence of endocervical cells in 5.3% of Papspins is due to a bias of methodology. Quality improvement was evident on Papspin for SBLB specimens. HPV testing could be performed with good results.     

Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices

OBJECTIVE: To examine cells that were retained on sampling devices used to collect ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) Pap smears in order to evaluate both the number and significance of cells that are routinely discarded with these devices after liquid-based specimens are collected. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred Pap smears from 100 women were prospectively procured after gynecologic Pap smears were collected for the ThinPrep Pap test. The sampling end of the collection devices was cut off and placed in a vial that contained SUREPATH preservative fluid (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A). The residual cell samples were processed using the SurePath PREPSTAIN slide processor (TriPath). A single liquid-based slide was prepared from the sampling devices from each of the 100 specimens collected. The slides produced from the discarded devices were reviewed for the following: squamous cells, endocervical component, epithelial cell abnormalities and miscellaneous findings. The slides prepared from the "throw-away" (TA) material were subsequently compared with the primary ThinPrep Pap smear slide. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the TA samples had an equal or greater number of squamous cells per high-power microscopic field when compared to the primary ThinPrep slide, with 8% of the TA slides demonstrating greater overall cellularity. An endocervical component was present on 27 of 66 cervical samples (40.9%). Three of five cases (60%) interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance had similar cells on the TA slides. Two cases of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance had no abnormal cells on the TA slides. Twelve of 14 cases (85.71%) of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion contained similar cells on the TA slides. Two of four cases (50%) of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion also had similar abnormal cells on the TA slides. Miscellaneous findings included 1 case of benign endometrial cells and 4 Candida infections present on both preparations, along with 1 case of Trichomonas vaginalis organisms present on the ThinPrep slide only. In 1 specimen, several multinucleated histiocytic giant cells were present only on the TA slide. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens prepared from TA collecting devices used for the ThinPrep Pap test are less sensitive than the primary specimen for the detection of cervical lesions. This is in contrast to split-sample studies involving ThinPrep and conventional smears. Our study documented the presence of normal and abnormal cells discarded from ThinPrep sampling devices in a high percentage of cases. Discarded abnormal cells on the TA slides were, however, few when compared to the primary specimen, with only 1 exception involving a high grade lesion.     

Decrease in numbers of glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ liquid-based cytology preparations

Objective:  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) has become standard of care in the management of cervical squamous neoplasia and with cone biopsy glandular intraepithelial neoplasia. Controversy remains about the long-term effects of this traumatic procedure. The aim of this study was to count and compare the number of endocervical glandular cell groups in pre- and post-LLETZ cervical preparations using liquid-based cytology to establish a cyto-morphological correlate of destruction of the transformation zone.
Methods:  The cytology/histology correlation audit records of the Cytopathology Department of St Luke's Hospital in 2003 and early 2004 were used to select patients with a cytological diagnosis of high grade dyskaryosis followed by LLETZ. Only those cases with post-LLETZ cytological follow-up were selected. Cases using conventional smears were excluded. One hundred and twenty slides (60 pairs of slides) in total were retrieved. The cases underwent review and all groups of >3 glandular cells in each slide were counted by AM while blinded as to whether smears were pre- or post-LLETZ. Medians were compared using a Mann–Whitney U -test.
Results:  The median number of groups of endocervical glandular cells of the pre-treatment group was 5.5 and of the post-treatment group was 2.0. There were significantly fewer endocervical glandular cell groups in the post-LLETZ population ( P  = 0.03).
Conclusions:  The number of endocervical glandular groups in cervical cytological preparations decreases significantly following LLETZ procedure. This suggests that cytological follow-up may not be as useful in glandular neoplasia cases. Few or absent glandular cell groups in post-LLETZ preparations may have implications for adequacy assessment.     

Inadequate cervical smears: results of an educational slide exchange scheme

Fifty-six slides, predominantly inadequate and of varying difficulty, were circulated to 12 laboratories as an educationally based slide exchange scheme. Three slides failed to achieve an agreed majority consensus opinion. Seventy percent of participants agreed with the consensus opinion in 80% of slides. Of the slides originally reported as inadequate, the consensus diagnosis was inadequate in 78%, negative in 12% and abnormal in 10%. The latter included two cases of high-grade dyskaryosis. There was good agreement for the two most frequent causes of inadequacy in submitted slides (obscured and poor cellularity). There was poor consistency in reporting the presence or absence of endocervical and immature squamous metaplastic cells, to an extent that questions their use in the assessment of smear adequacy. Three inadequate slides on consensus opinion were associated with subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (grade III) or invasive squamous cell carcinoma. In the latter case, the slide had originally been reported as negative by the submitting laboratory.     

Determination of liquid-based cervical cytology specimen adequacy using cellular light scatter and flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND: The majority of cervical cytology specimens are being collected in liquid-based preservatives (LBP). However, the assessment of specimen adequacy, as mandated by The Bethesda System (TBS), is still being performed at the time of slide review. We present a rapid, flow cytometric method for assessing specimen adequacy. METHODS: Three LBPs were compared for cell-surface antigen preservation. A three-color antibody panel was used to confirm the light scatter profile of specific cells in a liquid-based cervical cytology specimen. Using forward and orthogonal light scatter alone, we were able to assess the adequacy of liquid-based cytology specimens in all LBPs tested. RESULTS: The number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), endocervical (columnar) cells, ectocervical (squamous) cells, and debris in 120 liquid-based cervical cytology samples was quantified in less than 10 min. Using cutoffs of > 20% PMNs, < 1.0% endocervical cells, < 1.0% ectocervical cells, and < 500 total cells per milliliter, light scatter correlated with microscopic determination of adequacy with a correlation coefficient of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: This rapid method allows the quantitative determination of cervical cytology adequacy in liquid-based cytology preparations prior to the preparation of slides for morphologic assessment.     

Optimized quality of histologic images allows the use of neural network scanning in diagnosis of fungal infection of abnormal nails

OBJECTIVE: The neural network scanning (NNS) system, formerly known as Papnet, is capable of selecting fungi in cervical smears. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the optimized quality of histologic images created using a combination of coagulant fixation and microwave histoprocessing allows the application of this computer-assisted microscopy in the diagnostic process. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective study, 117 abnormal nails clinically suspect for fungal disease werefixed in a coagulant fixative, BoonFix, processed in a microwave histoprocessor to obtain optimal paraffin sections and stained with the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) method. The stained paraffin sections were randomly numbered and screened by two independent pathologists for diagnosis of fungal hyphae and spores. The same sections were subsequently scanned by a neural network, and a maximum of 128 digital images produced by the system were screened and diagnosed by pathologists. Using light microscopy as the gold standard for diagnosis of fungi, the usefulness of NNS was then assessed. RESULTS: The fungi and spores were clearly demonstrated in the paraffin sections, and the NNS system detected and recorded them efficiently. The hyphae and spores could be identified in these pixilated images with relative ease. Of the 117 examined cases, 50 were positive and 47 negative by both methods. In the 20 remaining cases, NNS did not present images of fungi that were present in the histologic sections. In practice, this implies that only 67 out of 117 cases (57%) must be screened by light microscopy. NNS recorded not only fungi and spores in the 128 digital images but also artifacts, such as round, deeply PAS-positive granules of talcum powder, which by light microscopy might be mistaken for fungal spores. CONCLUSION: NNS proves applicable for the selection of spores and fungi if the histologic sections are of sufficiently high quality. As a result, the number of slides to be screened by light microscopy can be reduced substantially. In a throughput diagnostic laboratory handling a large number of such cases this technology can be highly valuable.     

Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a liquid-based Pap test, the ThinPrep Pap test (TP) (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), by comparing concurrent TP and cervical biopsy results on 782 patients who were referred for colposcopy because of previously abnormal conventional Pap smears (CPs). STUDY DESIGN: The ability of TP diagnoses of atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) to predict biopsy diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was analyzed using chi2 and McNemar tests. RESULTS: The rate of agreement between diagnoses of SIL by TP and CIN by biopsy was 74.7%. ASC-US accounted for 16.0% of TP diagnoses. ASC-US had biopsy diagnoses of CIN 1 in 60% and CIN 2/3 in 12.8% of cases. For TP diagnosis of low grade SIL, biopsy diagnoses of CIN 2/3 were found in 13.5% of cases. For TP diagnoses of ASC-US and higher, the proportions of TP and cervical biopsies in comparable diagnostic categories were statistically significant (p < 0.001), with TP having sensitivity of 89.4% and positive predictive value of 89.7% for the detection of CIN. The false positive rate for TP was 8.1%, but rescreening confirmed the presence of abnormal cells in 51 of 63 (81.0%) cases of ASC-US or higher having negative biopsies. TP had a false negative rate of 8.3% and negative predictive value of 61.3%. Rescreening showed that most (77.6%) of the false negative TP specimens failed to have abnormal cells on the slides. CONCLUSION: For patients having previously detected cervical abnormalities by CP, concurrent TP demonstrated the following: (1) that it has high diagnostic accuracy for SIL, (2) that ASC-US was diagnostically equivalent to LSIL, and (3) that false negative TP for SIL can be attributed primarily to sampling rather than cytotechnologists' screening errors.     

Rapid detection of HSV from cytologic specimens collected into ThinPrep fixative

OBJECTIVE: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in neonates. A diagnosis of HSV on cervical cytologic studies could lead to a cesarean section, with an increase in the risk of maternal morbidity. The identification of viral lesions in sexually active women has medical and social implications. There have been reports of false positive diagnoses of HSV in patients with altered endocervical cells and with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. We evaluated a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to detect HSV-1 and HSV-2 in routinely collected cervical cytology specimens in ThinPrep fixative (Cytyc Corp., Marlborough, Massachussets, U.S.A.). STUDY DESIGN: DNA was extracted from five cases that demonstrated cytologic changes suggestive of an HSV infection. PCR amplification with subsequent gel electrophoresis was performed to detect the presence of HSV. RESULTS: HSV DNA was detected in three of five cases that were cytologically diagnosed as suspicious or strongly suspicious for HSV infection. CONCLUSION: The combination of the ThinPrep liquid-based method for cervical cytology with PCR allows prompt confirmation of the diagnosis of HSV without sacrificing the diagnostic morphology on the slide.     

Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of both screening and diagnosis in a liquid-based cervical sample. STUDY DESIGN: SurePath samples (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with known diagnoses were selected, including 18 negative, 16 low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 12 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases. Through a serial dilution technique, samples of varying cellularity were prepared. The 275 slides were assigned random numbers and were routinely screened by 1 of 2 senior cytotechnologists, blinded to the reference diagnosis. Specimens with a screening diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher were reviewed by two pathologists, resulting in a final consensus diagnosis. Using a grid counting system, cellularity was determined for each slide. RESULTS: There was a clear demarcation in sensitivity between specimens with a cellularity of < 5,000 or > or = 5,000 squamous cells. This applied to both the sensitivity for screening and to the final consensus diagnosis. For cases with a reference diagnosis of LSIL+, at a cytotechnologist screening level of ASCUS or greater, sensitivity increased from 72.8% (< 5,000 cells) to 98.1% (> or = 5,000 cells) and for a reference diagnosis of HSIL from 85.7% to 100%, respectively. Similarly, for the consensus diagnosis, sensitivity rose from 78.5% (< 5,000 cells) to 96.6% (> or = 5,000 cells) for LSIL+ and from 82.9% to 100%, respectively, for HSIL. These differences were statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A minimum cellularity of 5,000 squamous cells is recommended for SurePath liquid-based cervical preparations.     

Performance of 3 methods for quality control for gynecologic cytology diagnoses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance and viability of internal quality control (QC) strategies in a public health laboratory of the state of S?o Paulo. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed with 3 QC strategies to improve internal cytologic diagnoses: morphologic guided-list criteria (MGLC), 100% rapid-rescreening (100% RR) of negative slides ("turret" method) and 10% rescreening (10% R) of negative slides. Cases were examined at Adolfo Lutz Institute, S?o Paulo, Brazil, from 2002 to 2004. Histopathologic results, when available, were considered gold standard; cytologic consensus diagnosis was by 2 pathologists when histologic results were unavailable. RESULTS: MGLC selected 20.7% samples with cytologic atypias, 10% R selected 0.6% and RR selected 2.5%. Cytologic/histologic initial concordance was 57.4%, low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion false negative rate was 34.9% and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion false negative rate was 12.2%. After diagnosis, consensus concordance was 97.2%. CONCLUSION: The 100% RR and 10% R QC strategies detected more false negative cases in liquid-based cytology than in conventional Pap smears. The 100% RR strategy reduced the false negative results and allowed evaluation of individual staff performance. The 10% R strategy did not offer significant results. We concluded that association of MGLC and 100% RR strategies might improve cytologic diagnostic quality.     

Thin-layer preparations of dithiothreitol-treated bronchial washing specimens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combined effect of dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment and ThinPrep (TP) (Cytyc Corp, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) processing on bronchial washing specimens. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 431 bronchial washing specimens were initially treated with 0.05% DTT in a 30% methanol solution. After centrifugation, 1 TP slide and 2-4 conventional cytospin or smear preparations (CPs) were prepared. The reports of both preparations were compared in all cases. All 48 abnormal cases and 52 consecutive negative cases were also compared for cellular composition, distribution of the cells, ease of interpretation and overall preparation quality. Screening time was recorded for 20 of the cases. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of one TP slide appeared comparable to that of 2-4 CPs. The TP slide was assessed to be equal or superior in overall quality to CP in 85% of 100 cases of paired specimens. The cleaner background and smaller cellular area of TP slides significantly reduced the screening time. Mucolysis and specimen homogenization were not always optimal, occasionally resulting in uneven subsampling and poorly cellular TPs. However, in general, TP slides were considered superior to CPs in overall quality. CONCLUSION: Improvement in specimen quality and reduced screening time have to be balanced against the high cost of consumables with the TP technique.     

Expert consultation for cervical carcinoma smears. Reliability of selected-field videomicroscopy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of videomicroscopy image selection for expert consultation in cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smears were selected and rescreened by a general pathologist who chose, from each slide, four or five fields featuring abnormal cells. Video images were digitized and stored on a 512 x 512-pixel matrix using an image acquisition and transmission system. Five experts each reviewed 20 of the 100 cases, and a sixth reviewed all 100 cases. Diagnoses based on selected digitized images were compared to those based on conventional examination of whole slides. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement was fair to excellent for all six experts (kappa value: 0.47-0.81); it was complete or acceptable in 68.4-85% of cases. Compared to the reference diagnosis, interobserver agreement was not significantly different whether cases were examined by screening the entire slide or by videomicroscopy of selected fields. The marked discordance in four cases concerned very small cells the significance of which was misinterpreted on videomicroscopy because of poor image quality due to lack of focus setting. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study showed that selection of videomicroscopy images seems as reliable as conventional examination of slides for expert consultation on diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smear cases.     

Utility of 2-D and 3-D virtual microscopy in cervical cytology education and testing

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of 3-D vs. 2-D virtual microscopy as adjuncts to education and assessment in cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Five cervical cytology slides were acquired in 2-D; then the identical area of the slide was acquired in 3-D, resulting in 2 sets of virtual slides for comparison with the original glass slide. Seventy-nine paid volunteer cytologists and cytotechnology students participated. Approximately half were sent the 2-D set of slides via the Web, and the others a 3-D set of slides on a DVD. Evaluators examined the virtual slides and committed to an interpretation. After receipt of the original glass slides, a second interpretation was made, if different from the virtual slide interpretation. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy using virtual cytology slides was similar to that for glass slides (94% vs. 96%). There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between 2-D and 3-D slides (p = 0.28); however, the ability to focus 3-D slides in the z-axis was strongly endorsed by the participants because of the uncertainty and frustration of having some cells out of focus on 2-D virtual slides. CONCLUSION: There was consensus that virtual cervical cytology slides would be a useful augmentation to education and testing.     

The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Even though diagnostic oral exfoliative cytology is a useful, economical and practical tool in the diagnosis of oral dysplasia and carcinoma, it is not yet extensively used. The results of conventional exfoliative and liquid-based diagnostic cytology in oral potentially malignant lesions (PML) are herein reported and compared with the histological diagnosis. METHODS: Either conventional (89) or liquid-based (384) exfoliative cytology was used for the diagnosis of oral dysplasia/carcinoma in 473 subjects and the results were compared with scalpel biopsy histology. Cells were collected using a Cytobrush device for conventional smears and with a dermatological curette for the liquid-based cytology. The 'curette technique' also allowed for the collection of 'accidental' tissue fragments, utilized as microbiopsies. RESULTS: Histological diagnosis was squamous carcinoma in 96 of 473 cases, high-grade dysplasia (oral intraepithelial neoplasia two to three) in 24 and other lesions in 353 cases. The smears in the conventional cytology group were inadequate in 12.4%, with an 85.7% sensitivity and a 95.9% specificity. There were 8.8% of inadequate specimens in the liquid-based cytology group; sensitivity was 95.1% and specificity was 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional cytology is useful when diagnosing oral PML (better sensitivity and predictive positive value if compared with the cervical smear test with similar specificity) and can improve the accuracy of histological diagnosis, liquid-based cytology gives better results, as it not only enhances both sensitivity and specificity, but also provides material for further investigation (AgNORs, DNA, microbiopsies, etc.).     

Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology

A. Evered and N. Dudding Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology Objective: To evaluate virtual microscopy in terms of diagnostic performance and acceptability among practising cytologists. Methods: Twenty‐four experienced cytologists were recruited to examine 20 SurePath® cervical cytology slides by virtual microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with glass slide microscopy using an unbiased crossover experimental design. Responses were allocated a score of one for a correct identification of normal or abnormal (borderline/atypical changes in squamous or glandular cells or worse) and a score of zero for an incorrect response (a normal slide reported as abnormal or vice versa). Perceptions of virtual microscopy were assessed by questionnaire analysis. Results: Participants yielded a total of 285 responses for the virtual slide set and 300 for the glass slide set. The approximate time to screen a virtual slide was 18 minutes, compared with 8 minutes or less for a glass slide. Overall there was no significant difference between virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.22). Virtual microscopy under‐performed when images were captured over a narrow focal range (P = 0.01). Diagnostic accuracy of virtual microscopy equalled that of glass slide microscopy when participants were able to focus through the full thickness of the slide images (P = 0.07). The most common difficulties experienced by participants with virtual microscopy were freezing of the computer screen during image download, slow response of the computer during slide movement and, in some instances, ‘fuzzy’ images. Cytologists have a strong preference for glass slides over virtual microscopy despite the overall equal diagnostic performance of the two viewing modalities. Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy of virtual microscopy can equal that of glass slide microscopy. However, without good computer network connections, wide focal range and software that permits effortless navigation across virtual slides, cytologists are unlikely to be convinced of the utility of this technology for cytology screening and diagnosis.     

Use of automated primary screening on liquid-based, thin-layer preparations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the AutoPap System (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) (TriPath) in screening AutoCyte PREP liquid-based, thin-layer preparations by comparing the final cytologic diagnoses with instrument slide classification results. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 9,665 AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides were first independently screened to establish a final cytologic diagnosis (reference diagnosis). The slides were then processed on the AutoPap System. Each slide successfully processed was reported into result categories. The generated report gave a ranking score for each slide designated for "review." Slides designated "no further review" (NFR) were also listed in the report. The reported results were then compared to the reference cytologic diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 9,665 slides initially submitted to the AutoPap, 8,688 (90.8%) were qualified for scanning, and 884 (9.2%) were definitely classified as process review or rerun and excluded from the study. Of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and greater (HSIL+), 85.2% were ranked in the first rank, 12.7% in the second, one (2.1%) in the third, none in the fourth and fifth and none in the NFR category. Of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 47.4% were ranked in the first rank, 20.8% in the second, 10.6% in the third, 10.1% in the fourth, 5.3% in the fifth and 5.8% in NFR. Of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, 53.6% were ranked in the first rank, 22.5% in the second, 12.4% in the third, 5.4% in the fourth, 3.8% in the fifth and 2.3% in NFR. Considering a cutoff value at < or = 3rd rank, 84% of cervical abnormalities (RR 6.52, 95% CI 4.96-8.66) and 100% of HSIL+ were identified. CONCLUSION: The AutoPap demonstrates a high capability for detecting cervical abnormalities on AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides. HSIL+ was associated with the highest instrument scores.     

P-9A COMPARISON OF THE REPORTING MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF GLANDULAR NEOPLASIA FOR CONVENTIONAL AND LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY FOR CERVICAL SAMPLES

Cervical cancer accounts for approximately 15% of cancer diagnosed in women worldwide with up to 190 000 deaths per annum. One of the major causes of cervical cancer is the infection of human papillomavirus (HPV), a DNA virus. This virus is epidermotropic; there are over 75 subtypes and subtypes 16, 18, 31 and 33 are associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinomas. Since the start of the cervical screening in mid 1960s, the cervical cancer rate has decreased. There are two techniques used for slide preparation and staining: conventional cytology and liquid based cytology (LBC). Due to the differences in sample collection and preparation, certain aspects of cell morphology, architecture and patterns will present differently from each other on the slide. The study was conducted in a County Hospital. Twenty conventional slides and eight LBC slides already reported as ? Glandular neoplasia were reviewed and assessed with regards to their morphological features. Moreover, conventional slides were compared with LBC slides to determine the differences in their cell morphology, sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, a semi-quantitative method was used and also true-positive and false-positive rates were evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV). The findings indicated that despite the differences in cell morphology there are many similarities between the two techniques. The study also showed that it was difficult to distinguish between abnormal glandular cells and abnormal squamous cells, which may end in a false positive result and over reporting of glandular neoplasia. Finally, it showed that LBC slides were easier to screen and also had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the LBC technique is more accurate and conversion to this technique is the positive step in the screening program.     

A single ThinPrep® slide may not be representative in all head and neck fine needle aspirate specimens

Objectives:  Ideally, head and neck aspiration should be performed by trained aspirators within the setting of a one-stop clinic, where smeared material is available for immediate assessment. However, this may not always be possible for practical reasons and the use of liquid-based techniques in head and neck cytology is increasing. Although liquid-based cytology has been extensively validated for use in gynaecological cytology, no studies have investigated whether or not a single ThinPrep ^® slide is representative for head and neck aspirate specimens. We performed a prospective audit of head and neck fine needle aspiration specimens processed by the ThinPrep ^® method to investigate whether a single ThinPrep ^® slide was representative.
Methods:  A prospective audit of 115 consecutive head and neck aspirates was carried out. A single ThinPrep ^® slide was prepared and a diagnosis recorded. The remainder of the specimen was then spun down and prepared as a cell block. The ThinPrep ^® and cell block diagnoses were compared.
Results:  In 36 cases (31%), the cell block provided additional information that contributed to the diagnosis. In 14 (12%), the cell block was regarded as essential to the diagnosis.
Conclusions:  A single ThinPrep^® slide may not provide representative diagnostic material in all head and neck aspirates. This should be taken into consideration when contemplating the use of liquid-based methods for non-gynaecological cytology.