A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) modulator blocks adipocyte differentiation but stimulates glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists such as the thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitizers used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. These compounds induce adipogenesis in cell culture models and increase weight gain in rodents and humans. We have identified a novel PPARgamma ligand, LG100641, that does not activate PPARgamma but selectively and competitively blocks thiazolidinedione-induced PPARgamma activation and adipocyte conversion. It also antagonizes target gene activation as well as repression in agonist-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. This novel PPARgamma antagonist does not block adipocyte differentiation induced by a ligand for the retinoid X receptor (RXR), the heterodimeric partner for PPARgamma, or by a differentiation cocktail containing insulin, dexamethasone, and 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine. Surprisingly, LG100641, like the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone, increases glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Such selective PPARgamma antagonists may help determine whether insulin sensitization by thiazolidinediones is mediated solely through PPARgamma activation, and whether there are PPARgamma-ligand-independent pathways for adipocyte differentiation. If selective PPARgamma modulators block adipogenesis in vivo, they may prevent obesity, lower insulin resistance, and delay the onset of type 2 diabetes.     

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in cystic fibrosis lung epithelium

The pathophysiology of cystic fibrosis (CF) inflammatory lung disease is not well understood. CF airway epithelial cells respond to inflammatory stimuli with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines as a result of increased NF-kappaB activation. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) inhibits NF-kappaB activity and is reported to be reduced in CF. If PPARgamma participates in regulatory dysfunction in the CF lung, perhaps PPARgamma ligands might be useful therapeutically. Cell models of CF airway epithelium were used to evaluate PPARgamma expression and binding to NF-kappaB at basal and under conditions of inflammatory stimulation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or TNFalpha/IL-1beta. An animal model of CF was used to evaluate the potential of PPARgamma agonists as therapeutic agents in vivo. In vitro, PPARgamma agonists reduced IL-8 and MMP-9 release from airway epithelial cells in response to PAO1 or TNFalpha/IL-1beta stimulation. Less NF-kappaB bound to PPARgamma in CF than normal cells, in two different assays; PPARgamma agonists abrogated this reduction. PPARgamma bound less to its target DNA sequence in CF cells. To test the importance of the reported PPARgamma inactivation by phosphorylation, we observed that inhibitors of ERK, but not JNK, were synergistic with PPARgamma agonists in reducing IL-8 secretion. In vivo, administration of PPARgamma agonists reduced airway inflammation in response to acute infection with P. aeruginosa in CF, but not wild-type, mice. In summary, PPARgamma inhibits the inflammatory response in CF, at least in part by interaction with NF-kappaB in airway epithelial cells. PPARgamma agonists may be therapeutic in CF.     

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-mediated NF-kappa B activation and apoptosis in pre-B cells

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) in adipocyte physiology has been exploited for the treatment of diabetes. The expression of PPARgamma in lymphoid organs and its modulation of macrophage inflammatory responses, T cell proliferation and cytokine production, and B cell proliferation also implicate it in immune regulation. Despite significant human exposure to PPARgamma agonists, little is known about the consequences of PPARgamma activation in the developing immune system. Here, well-characterized models of B lymphopoiesis were used to investigate the effects of PPARgamma ligands on nontransformed pro/pre-B (BU-11) and transformed immature B (WEHI-231) cell development. Treatment of BU-11, WEHI-231, or primary bone marrow B cells with PPARgamma agonists (ciglitazone and GW347845X) resulted in rapid apoptosis. A role for PPARgamma and its dimerization partner, retinoid X receptor (RXR)alpha, in death signaling was supported by 1) the expression of RXRalpha mRNA and cytosolic PPARgamma protein, 2) agonist-induced binding of PPARgamma to a PPRE, and 3) synergistic increases in apoptosis following cotreatment with PPARgamma agonists and 9-cis-retinoic acid, an RXRalpha agonist. PPARgamma agonists activated NF-kappaB (p50, Rel A, c-Rel) binding to the upstream kappaB regulatory element site of c-myc. Only doses of agonists that induced apoptosis stimulated NF-kappaB-DNA binding. Cotreatment with 9-cis-retinoic acid and PPARgamma agonists decreased the dose required to activate NF-kappaB. These data suggest that activation of PPARgamma-RXR initiates a potent apoptotic signaling cascade in B cells, potentially through NF-kappaB activation. These results have implications for the nominal role of the PPARgamma in B cell development and for the use of PPARgamma agonists as immunomodulatory therapeutics.     

PPARgamma physiology and pathology in gastrointestinal epithelial cells

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is expressed at very high levels in the gastrointestinal epithelium. Many of the functions of PPARgamma in gastrointestinal epithelial cells have been elucidated in recent years, and a pattern is emerging which suggests that this receptor plays an important role in gastrointestinal physiology. There is also strong evidence that PPARgamma is a colon cancer suppressor in pre-clinical rodent models of sporadic colon cancer, and there is considerable interest in exploitation of PPARgamma agonists as prophylactic or chemopreventive agents in colon cancer. Studies in mice and in human colon cancer cell lines suggest several mechanisms that might account for the tumor suppressive effects of PPARgamma agonists, although it is not in all cases clear whether these effects are altogether mediated by PPARgamma. Conversely, several reports suggest that PPARgamma agonists may promote colon cancer under certain circumstances. This possibility warrants considerable attention since several million individuals with type II diabetes are currently taking PPARgamma agonists. This review will focus on recent data related to four critical questions: what is the physiological function of PPARgamma in gastrointestinal epithelial cells; how does PPARgamma suppress colon carcinogenesis; is PPARgamma a tumor promoter; and what is the future of PPARgamma in colon cancer prevention?     

Interactions of opioid and chemokine receptors: oligomerization of mu,kappa, and delta with CCR5 on immune cells

In this study, we examined the signaling pathways for extracellular signal-related protein kinase (ERK) activation by three structurally different peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists. In murine C2C12 myoblasts, treatment with 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)), ciglitazone, and GW1929 leads to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Consistent with ERK phosphorylation, mitogen activated protein/ERK kinase (MEK) phosphorylation as well as Raf-1 kinase activity are also accordingly stimulated, while the constitutive Ser259 phosphorylation of Raf-1 is decreased. The ERK phosphorylation induced by PPARgamma agonists is not blocked by the PKC inhibitors GF109203X and Ro31-8220, the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin, the Ras inhibitor FPTI, the negative mutant of Ras, or the PPARgamma antagonist bisphenol A diglycidil ether. Expression of PPARgamma2 without DNA binding domain or with a nonphosphorylatable mutant (S112A) fails to change ERK phosphorylation by 15d-PGJ(2). On the contrary, the ERK phosphorylation by PPARgamma agonists is inhibited by the MEK inhibitor PD98059, GSH, and permeable SOD mimetic MnTBAP. Chemiluminescence study reveals that these three PPARgamma agonists are able to induce superoxide anion production, with an efficacy similar to their action on ERK phosphorylation. Consistent with this notion, we also show that superoxide anion donor 2,3-dimethoxy-1,4-naphoquinone elicits ERK phosphorylation. In this study, we for the first time demonstrate a novel mechanism, independent of Ras activation but initiated by superoxide anion production, for PPARgamma agonists to trigger the Raf-MEK-ERK1/2 signaling pathway.     

Induction of apoptosis in human and rat glioma by agonists of the nuclear receptor PPARgamma

Malignant astrocytomas are among the most common brain tumours and few therapeutic options exist. It has recently been recognized that the ligand-activated nuclear receptor PPARgamma can regulate cellular proliferation and induce apoptosis in different malignant cells. We report the effect of three structurally different PPARgamma agonists inducing apoptosis in human (U87MG and A172) and rat (C6) glioma cells. The PPARgamma agonists ciglitazone, LY171 833 and prostaglandin-J2, but not the PPARalpha agonist WY14643, inhibited proliferation and induced cell death. PPARgamma agonist-induced cell death was characterized by DNA fragmentation and nuclear condensation, as well as inhibited by the synthetic receptor-antagonist bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE). In contrast, primary murine astrocytes were not affected by PPARgamma agonist treatment. The apoptotic death in the glioma cell lines treated with PPARgamma agonists was correlated with the transient up-regulation of Bax and Bad protein levels. Furthermore, inhibition of Bax expression by specific antisense oligonucleotides protected glioma cells against PPARgamma-mediated apoptosis, indicating an essential role of Bax in PPARgamma-induced apoptosis. However, PPARgamma agonists not only induced apoptosis but also caused redifferentiation as indicated by outgrowth of long processes and expression of the redifferentiation marker N-cadherin in response to PPARgamma agonists. Taken together, treatment of glioma cells with PPARgamma agonists may hold therapeutic potential for the treatment of gliomas.     

A high-capacity assay for PPARgamma ligand regulation of endogenous aP2 expression in 3T3-L1 cells

A novel class of insulin-sensitizing agents, the thiazolidinedines (TZDs), has proven effective in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. These compounds, as well as a subclass of non-TZD insulin-sensitizing agents, have been shown to be peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma agonists. PPARgamma plays a critical role in adipogenesis and PPARgamma agonists have been shown to induce adipocyte differentiation. Here, PPARgamma ligand activity has been assessed in murine 3T3-L1 cells, a commonly used in vitro model of adipogenesis, by measuring their ability to induce adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (aP2) mRNA expression. In order to perform this task, we have developed a novel, multiwell assay for the direct detection of aP2 mRNA in cell lysates that is based on hybridization of mRNA to target-specific oligonucleotides. These oligonucleotide probes are conjugated to enzymes that efficiently process unique chemical substrates into robust fluorescent products. Ribosomal protein 36B4 mRNA, a gene whose expression is unaffected by adipogenesis, serves as the control in the assay. Two assay formats have been developed, a single analyte assay in which aP2 and 36B4 mRNA expression are assayed in separate lysate aliquots and a dual analyte assay which can measure aP2 and 36B4 mRNA simultaneously. Both forms of the assay have been used to quantify attomole levels of aP2 and 36B4 mRNAs in differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes treated with PPARgamma agonists. The potencies of PPARgamma agonists determined by this novel methodology showed good correlation with those derived from aP2 mRNA slot-blot analysis and PPARgamma transactivation assays. We conclude that the aP2 single and dual analyte assays both provide specific and sensitive measurements of endogenous aP2 mRNA levels that can be used to assess the activity of PPARgamma ligands in 3T3-L1 cells. Since the assay obviates the need for RNA isolation and is performed in an automatable multiwell format, it can serve as a high-throughput, cell-based screen for the identification and characterization of PPARgamma modulators.     

Combination therapy with PPARgamma and PPARalpha agonists increases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in db/db mice

Although peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma agonists ameliorate insulin resistance, they sometimes cause body weight gain, and the effect of PPAR agonists on insulin secretion is unclear. We evaluated the effects of combination therapy with a PPARgamma agonist, pioglitazone, and a PPARalpha agonist, bezafibrate, and a dual agonist, KRP-297, for 4 wk in male C57BL/6J mice and db/db mice, and we investigated glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by in situ pancreatic perfusion. Body weight gain in db/db mice was less with KRP-297 treatment than with pioglitazone or pioglitazone + bezafibrate treatment. Plasma glucose, insulin, triglyceride, and nonesterified fatty acid levels were elevated in untreated db/db mice compared with untreated C57BL/6J mice, and these parameters were significantly ameliorated in the PPARgamma agonist-treated groups. Also, PPARgamma agonists ameliorated the diminished GSIS and insulin content, and they preserved insulin and GLUT2 staining in db/db mice. GSIS was further increased by PPARgamma and -alpha agonists. We conclude that combination therapy with PPARgamma and PPARalpha agonists may be more useful with respect to body weight and pancreatic GSIS in type 2 diabetes with obesity.