SDRS联合BAK技术治疗腰椎滑脱症的研究

对后方入路SDRS内固定加BAK植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床应用研究进行初步报告,探讨此项技术的手术要点和早期临床效果。自2001年1月至2001年8月,对13例腰椎滑脱患者行后方入路椎体间BAK植骨融合、SDRS内固定。随访6个月－14个月,平均9.1个月。结合临床症状改善程度和X线片上植骨副合、复位程度综合进行疗效评定。结果：疗效优3例,良9例,差1例,优良率92.3%。结果表明从一个切口入路行椎体间BAK植骨融合、SDRS内固定术,能对前柱和后柱同时起稳定作用,有利于滑脱的复位和维持正常的腰椎前凸,符合腰椎的生物力学要求。     

微创技术在腰椎固定、融合术中的临床应用

近几年来,随着脊柱基础研究的发展以及各种新理论、新方法、新技术相继出现,微创技术在,临床中治疗各种腰椎疾患取得了很大进步.脊柱微创外科,具有创伤小、出血少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快等优点,受到腰椎疾病患者的欢迎.目前用于腰椎椎间融合的微创手术方法有前路腰椎椎体间融合术、后路腰椎椎体间融合术、经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术、极外侧椎体间融合术、轴向椎体间融合术以及多种微创技术联合应用.不同微创技术各有其优缺点,具有不同手术适应征,在临床应用中需要根据腰椎疾患的具体特征,选用合适的腰椎微创手术,以达到最佳临床效果.本文从腰椎微创手术入路改进、手术器械的创新以及在临床应用的效果方面作一综述.     

有限元分析方法在口腔临床中的应用进展

一、前言有限元法 (finiteelementmethod ,FEM )是一种实用有效的理论应力分析方法。该方法首先把连续的弹性体分割为有限个单元 ,以其结合体来代替原弹性体 ,然后借助计算机进行数据的处理及运算 ,对连续体离散成的有限个单元进行力学分析 ,并由此获得整个连续体的力学性质特征。有限元法由Turner等 195 6年首先提出 ,而后被逐渐广泛运用于工程技术的各个领域[1] 。上世纪七十年代初 ,Farah等将有限元法带入口腔医学领域 ,因其具有实验应力分析方法无可比拟的优越性而得到大量运用。近年来随着电子计算机技术的飞速发展和各种功能齐全的…     

两种植骨方式在胸腰椎结核手术中的应用

目的:比较不同植骨方式治疗胸腰椎结核的手术效果,探讨颗粒自体骨与块状自体骨两种植骨方式在治疗胸腰椎结核的临床疗效。方法:2008年1月至2010年12月期间在我院手术治疗的胸腰椎结核患者132例,其中采用块状自体骨进行骨移植的患者60例,采用颗粒状自体骨进行骨移植的患者72例,随机从两种植骨方式中各抽取20例患者进行回顾性分析,对两组患者术中出血量、住院时间、术后神经功能改善情况、植骨融合情况、后凸畸形矫正状况进行对比。结果:所有患者均一期愈合,无全身并发症,两组患者随访12~36个月,平均18个月,影像学提示内固定位置良好,无松动及断裂,结核病灶无复发。块状骨组术后6个月随访植骨融合率15%(3/20)术后9个月融合率45%(9/20),术后12个月融合率95%(19/20)。颗粒骨组术后6个月随访植骨融合率45%(9/20)术后9个月融合率80%(16/20),术后12个月融合率100%。块状骨组术前Cobb角为29.8°±5.0°,术后Cobb角为14.7°±2.5°,末次随访Cobb角为16.0°±2.9°。颗粒骨组术前Cobb角为30.9±7.6°,术后Cobb角为15.6°±3.8°,末次随访Cobb角为16.7°±3.8°,两组病人术后cobb角较术前有明显矫正,末次随访无明显丢失,两组比较无显著性差异(P0.05)。颗粒骨组术中出血量明显少于块状骨组,两组比较有统计学意义(P0.05)。住院时间两组比较无显著性差异(P0.05)。结论:颗粒状自体骨与块状自体骨相比在胸腰椎结核手术中植入方便,出血量少,植骨融合时间短,融合率高,是胸腰椎结核植骨的理想选择。     

椎间植骨粒体积对腰椎滑脱融合内固定术融合效果的影响

目的:探讨在腰椎后路植骨融合手术中,椎间植骨粒的体积对手术效果的影响。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年5月-2013年9月采用腰椎后路植骨融合术的75例患者的临床资料,根据患者手术中椎间植骨粒体积不同分为A组(小体积组,5粒/cm3)、B组(中体积组,11粒/cm3)以及C组(大体积组,23粒/cm3)。分析三组患者的植骨粒体积、植骨融合率以及手术效果。结果:三组患者植骨粒体积比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);椎间植骨总体积比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。与术前比较,三组术后ODI指数及VAS评分明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);但三组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。B组植骨融合率高于A组及C组,而A组高于C组,组间比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。手术后各组椎体滑脱程度与术前相比得到明显改善(P0.05)。结论:腰椎滑脱内固定术中应用中等体积植骨粒可明显提高椎体间融合率。     

椎体加椎间植骨融合术在腰椎爆裂性骨折患者中的应用效果与安全性探究

目的:探讨椎体加椎间植骨融合术在治疗腰椎爆裂性骨折患者中的临床效果及安全性。方法:选取2016年12月～2017年10月我院骨科收治的腰椎爆裂性骨折患者90例,按照手术方式将患者分成研究组和对照组,每组45例。研究组给予后路内固定术联合椎体加椎间植骨术治疗,对照组给予后路内固定术联合后外侧植骨术治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量以及术后3个月和12个月的椎体Cobb角、患者术后骨折愈合情况、内固定有效情况。结果:研究组手术时间、术中出血量、术后3个月和12个月椎体Cobb角明显短于或低于对照组,但骨折愈合率、内固定有效率显著高于对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:椎体加椎间植骨融合术治疗腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床综合效果显著优于后路内固定术联合后外侧植骨术治疗,且安全性较好。     

肱骨有限元模型建立及生物力学分析

目的:以成人肱骨为例,将医学图像三维重建技术和有限元方法结合应用于正骨手法研究,建立正常肱骨有限元模型,验证模型的有效性并进行生物力学分析。方法:选择一位青年男性志愿者,对其上肢自尺桡骨上端至肱骨头进行连续断层扫描,得到CT图像,将CT数据导入MIMICS软件中,通过图像分割、三维重建和材料属性赋值,构建正常肱骨有限元模型,利用ANSYS软件进行力学分析,与文献中肱骨的生物力学数据相比较,以此验证模型的有效性。结果:建立了正常肱骨三维几何模型和有限元模型。利用ANSYS软件,对模型进行了有效性验证。所建模型物理特性与真实骨骼相近,能很好地反映骨骼的力学变化,实现手法的定量分析。结论:所建立的肱骨模型外形逼真、在不同载荷下的应力值与相关文献一致,可用作中医仿真系统中的虚拟骨折模型。     

一期前路病灶清除植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎结核

目的探讨前路一期病灶清除、植骨、前路内固定手术治疗胸腰椎结核的疗效。方法 2010~2013年我院对42例胸腰椎结核患者进行一期病灶清除植骨前路内固定,病变节段:T5~T108例,T11~L129例,L2~L45例。其中病变累及1个椎体29例,累及2个椎体10例,跳跃型和累及3个椎体3例。累及1个椎体者应用Z-PlateⅡ钛板内固定,累及2个椎体或上胸椎结核者则选用钉-棒系统(CDH M8)固定。术后抗结核治疗不少于9个月。结果 42例患者均得到随访,随访时间6个月~4年,平均2.6年。手术切口均1期愈合,术后全身症状及局部疼痛消失,神经症状有不同程度恢复,所有病灶愈合,其中39例患者植骨融合,内固定牢固;3例患者因过早进行重体力劳动导致螺钉松动,植骨块塌陷,再次出现后凸畸形,经再次手术后治愈。结论一期病灶清除植骨内固定手术结合规范药物抗痨治疗胸腰椎结核的临床疗效显著、可靠。     

椎弓根螺钉用于植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核的临床研究

目的:探讨椎弓根内固定联合植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年5月至2014年5月在我院接受治疗的50例胸腰椎结核患者的临床资料,结合影像资料评价患者手术前后的红细胞沉降率、后凸畸形矫正情况、Frankel分级及术后并发症的发生情况等。结果:所有患者术后病理均证实为脊柱结核,术中27例植入大块自体髂骨,23例植入自体肋骨捆绑植骨。24例采用椎体侧前方钉棒内固定,26例采用后路椎弓根螺钉系统内固定。术中未出现脊髓、神经、血管损伤及血气胸等并发症。患者术后红细胞沉降率获得改善,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后Cobb角明显获得矫正,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。患者术后脊柱损伤程度明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:椎弓根内固定联合椎体间植骨融合术治疗胸腰椎结核具有良好的临床效果,不仅可以改善红细胞沉降率,而且可以矫正患者脊柱后凸畸形,值得临床推广应用。     

经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗胸腰椎结核疗效观察

目的:研究经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗胸腰椎结核的疗效.方法:选择胸腰椎结核的患者作为研究对象,随机分为给予自体植骨融合的观察组和椎间融合器植骨融合的对照组,观察手术相关指标、椎体功能相关指标、活动状态和生活质量.结果:观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后卧床时间、Cobb角均明显少于对照组;治疗后椎间隙高度、椎体融合率、KPS评分和生活质量优良率明显高于对照组.结论:经后路一期病灶清除、自体植骨融合、内固定治疗能够改善治疗效果、提高生活质量,具有积极的临床价值.     

Finite Element Analysis of Interbody Cages in a Human Lumbar Spine

Abstract

An innovative surgical procedure is vertebral stabilization by interbody cages. It is currently being used to separate and stabilize vertebral bodies and to promote bony fusion of the vertebrae onto or through the cages. This surgery, at some spine levels, can be performed through a laparoscope as an outpatient procedure with low morbidity. Because the procedure is new, little structural information is available on the interbody cages. The objective of this study was to evaluate the human lumbar spine stabilized by interbody cages biomechanically. The finite element method was used to compare cage designs by considering stresses in the cage and in the bone as well as relative displacements between the cage and the adjacent bone at the interface. The biomechanical evaluation considered different bone densities and considered axial, torsional, and bending loads on the lumbar spine. Stress analysis predicts local regions of stress concentration that could be damaging to cancellous bone and will likely require a remodeling response for local damage. This study predicts relative micromotion that could cause the bone resorption and fibrous tissue formation on the contact surfaces of the cage. The geometric constraints caused by the use of two cages will reduce the relative motion and therefore be more likely to allow bone ingrowth at the posterocentral contact region. Finite element analysis suggests that cages are a promising method for separation and stabilization of the vertebral bodies.     

Finite Element Analysis of Interbody Cages in a Human Lumbar Spine

An innovative surgical procedure is vertebral stabilization by interbody cages. It is currently being used to separate and stabilize vertebral bodies and to promote bony fusion of the vertebrae onto or through the cages. This surgery, at some spine levels, can be performed through a laparoscope as an outpatient procedure with low morbidity. Because the procedure is new, little structural information is available on the interbody cages. The objective of this study was to evaluate the human lumbar spine stabilized by interbody cages biomechanically. The finite element method was used to compare cage designs by considering stresses in the cage and in the bone as well as relative displacements between the cage and the adjacent bone at the interface. The biomechanical evaluation considered different bone densities and considered axial, torsional, and bending loads on the lumbar spine. Stress analysis predicts local regions of stress concentration that could be damaging to cancellous bone and will likely require a remodeling response for local damage. This study predicts relative micromotion that could cause the bone resorption and fibrous tissue formation on the contact surfaces of the cage. The geometric constraints caused by the use of two cages will reduce the relative motion and therefore be more likely to allow bone ingrowth at the posterocentral contact region. Finite element analysis suggests that cages are a promising method for separation and stabilization of the vertebral bodies.     

Effect of a Double Helical Spring Decompression Structure Backpack on the Lumbar Spine Biomechanics of School-Age Children: A Finite Element Study

Background: A children’s backpack is one of the important school supplies for school-age children. Long-term excessive weight can cause spinal deformity that cannot be reversed. This study compared a double helical spring decompression structure backpack (DHSB) with a traditional backpack (TB) to explore the optimization of decompression devices on upper body pressure. The finite element (FE) method was then used to explore the simulation of lumbar stress with different backpacks, in order to prove that DHSB can reduce the influence of backpack weight on lumbar vertebrae, avoid the occurrence of muscle discomfort and spinal deformity in children; Methods: 18 male children subjects (age: 12.5 ± 0.6 years; height: 145.5 ± 1.9 cm; bodyweight: 40.8 ± 3.1 kg) ran with DHSB and TB at a speed of 3.3 ± 0.2 m/s. Flexible pressure sensors were used to measure the pressure on the shoulder, back, and waist during running. The pressure data was then inputted into the FE model to simulate the effect of carrying different backpacks on the stress of the lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD); Result: There was a significant difference in shoulder and waist peak pressure between the DHSB and TB during the running posture. At a speed of 3.3 ± 0.2 m/s, the peak pressure of the shoulder and waist decreased. After finite element analysis, it was found that carrying DHSB on the back could effectively reduce the intervertebral disc pressure between L4-5 and L5-S1 by 27.9% and 34.1%, respectively; Conclusion: DHSB can effectively reduce the pressure on the shoulder and waist when children are running and can reduce the influence of backpacks on children’s posture to a certain extent. By finite element analysis, it is found that carrying DHSB can effectively reduce the stress of the lumbar intervertebral disc, and the damage to lumbar vertebrae is lower than with a TB.     

人工半骨盆假体置换联合腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定术后生物力学的有限元分析

目的:建立人工半骨盆假体置换与联合腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定后的三维有限元模型,评价腰骶段生物力学改变后半骨盆假体力学结构的特点。方法:采用CT薄层扫描采集原始数据,分别建立正常骨盆、半骨盆假体置换术后以及半骨盆假体置换联合腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定术后骨盆的三维有限元模型,分别在第4腰椎上终板平面施以500 N的垂直纵向载荷,分析不同骨盆模型的应力分布特点。结果:与正常骨盆有限元模型相比,半骨盆假体置换术后健侧骨盆应力分布以骶髂关节、髋臼窝及耻骨为主,置换侧半骨盆假体以耻骨连接棒、髋臼杯及髂骨座为主,最大应力出现在耻骨连接棒,应力峰值为65.62 MPa。联合腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定后健侧应力相对减小,置换侧髂骨固定座与骶骨固定处应力相对减小,应力分布以腰椎椎弓根钉棒、耻骨连接棒及髋臼杯为主,最大应力出现在椎弓根螺钉,应力峰值为107 MPa。结论:半骨盆假体置换联合腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定后钉棒分担了半骨盆置换后健侧骨盆及置换侧髂骨固定座与骶骨固定处附近的部分应力,缓解应力集中现象,降低术后骨盆破坏风险,一定程度上增加了半骨盆置换后骨盆的稳定性。     

微种植体支抗内收及压低上前牙的有限元研究

目的:探讨在利用微种植体支抗整体内收前牙过程中增加前牙区不同位置压低力对上颌前后牙的生物力学效应的影响。方法:采用螺旋CT扫描获取图像并结合MIMICS等软件进行三维重建,建立拔除上颌第一前磨牙整体内收前牙的三维有限元模型,分析利用第二前磨牙与第一磨牙间微种植体整体内收前牙过程中,增加前牙区不同位置压低力后前后牙的生物力学效应。结果:增加前牙区压低力后,前牙舌向倾斜移动明显减小,不同位置的垂直向力对前牙的影响不同,第一磨牙在整体内收过程中表现为远中倾斜移动。结论:1增加前牙区压低力能够实现对前牙转矩的有效控制;2增加前牙区的压低力使前牙更趋向于整体移动;3在微种植体支抗内收前牙过程实现了较好的垂直向控制。     

Adaptive Finite Element Analysis of the Anisotropic Biphasic Theory of Tissue-Equivalent Mechanics

Abstract

The nonlinear partial differential equations of the anisotropic biphasic theory of tissue-equivalent mechanics are solved with axial symmetry by an adaptive finite element system. The adaptive procedure operates within a method-of-lines framework using finite elements in space and backward difference software in time. Spatial meshes are automatically refined, coarsened, and relocated in response to error indications and material deformation. Problems with arbitrarily complex two-dimensional regions may be addressed. With meshes graded in high-error regions, the adaptive solutions have fewer degrees of freedom than solutions with comparable accuracy obtained on fixed quasi-uniform meshes. The adaptive software is used to address problems involving an isometric cell traction assay, where a cylindrical tissue equivalent is adhered at its end to fixed circular platens; a prototypical bioartificial artery; and a novel configuration that is intended as an initial step in a study to determine bioartificial arteries having optimal collagen and cell concentrations.     

股骨骨折术后1 年随访骨愈合模型的有限元分析

目的：对股骨骨折髓内钉术后1 年骨愈合模型快速建模,通过有限元分析研究对比术前术后模型,通过术前判定内固定取出后骨折断端是否断裂。方法：运用Mimics、Geomagic Studio、Abaqus等软件采用快速个体化建模方法对股骨骨折髓内钉术后1年内固定取出术前后的多层螺旋CT 数据进行快速建立模型,术前模型模拟剥除钢板后进行有限元分析,施加人体单腿站立时的静力载荷和约束,并将分析结果与术后模型进行对比,观察米塞斯应力分布情况、最大值及其所处部位。结果：按照材料属性进行区别显示米赛斯应力的最大值及最小值,在不同应力载荷下,手术前后各类型材料的米赛斯应力最大值及最小值部位相同,各类型材料中,最大值均没有位于骨折断端,不同方法的最大应力值部位相近,均在股骨中远端1/4 交界处,手术前后应力分布基本相同。结论：采用个体化建模方法可以对骨折内固定取出前的骨愈合模型进行运算分析,快速预判术后是否导致骨折断端断裂。     

MIS-TLIF结合钉棒系统治疗极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的临床研究

目的:观察和比较使用通道下经椎间孔腰椎融合术(Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion;MIS-TLIF)与常规开放手术治疗极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012.01至2016.01经纳入及排除标准筛选后的共计61例腰椎间盘突出症患者。根据不同的手术方法,将上述患者分别纳入实验组(MIS-TLIF组)与对照组(常规开放手术组)。对患者手术前后的疼痛程度(VAS),功能障碍程度(JOA)及各围手术期指标(出血量,手术时间,透视次数,卧床时间,花费,并发症)进行统计学比较。结果:MIS-TLIF组与对照组患者在术前的VAS评分及JOA评分的比较中无显著性差异,经外科手术后,都有显著性改善(P0.05)且两组间无显著统计学差异(P0.05)。但MIS-TLIF组在出血量,卧床时间,并发症等指标中都显著优于对照组(P0.05)。结论:通道下经椎间孔腰椎融合术作为一种微创术式,能够显著改善极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床症状,并具有其独有的优势和长处,在临床工作中可以进行进一步的使用和推广。