Nucleosome positioning and nucleosome stacking: two faces of the same coin

Nucleosomes are regularly spaced along eukaryotic genomes. In the emerging model, known as "statistical positioning", this spacing is due to steric repulsion between nucleosomes and to the presence of nucleosome excluding barriers on the genome. However, new experimental evidence recently challenged the "statistical positioning" model (Z. Zhang et al., Science, 2011, 332(6032), 977-980). We propose here that the regular spacing can be better explained by adding attractive interactions between nucleosomes. In our model those attractions are due to the fact that nucleosomes are stacked in regular chromatin fibers. In a self-reinforcing mechanism, regular nucleosome spacing promotes in turn nucleosome stacking. We first show that this model can precisely account for the nucleosome spacing observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We then use a simple toy model to show that attraction between nucleosomes can fasten the formation of the chromatin fiber.     

The inheritance of histone modifications depends upon the location in the chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Histone modifications are important epigenetic features of chromatin that must be replicated faithfully. However, the molecular mechanisms required to duplicate and maintain histone modification patterns in chromatin remain to be determined. Here, we show that the introduction of histone modifications into newly deposited nucleosomes depends upon their location in the chromosome. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, newly deposited nucleosomes consisting of newly synthesized histone H3-H4 tetramers are distributed throughout the entire chromosome. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3-K4), a hallmark of euchromatin, is introduced into these newly deposited nucleosomes, regardless of whether the neighboring preexisting nucleosomes harbor the K4 mutation in histone H3. Furthermore, if the heterochromatin-binding protein Sir3 is unavailable during DNA replication, histone H3-K4 methylation is introduced onto newly deposited nucleosomes in telomeric heterochromatin. Thus, a conservative distribution model most accurately explains the inheritance of histone modifications because the location of histones within euchromatin or heterochromatin determines which histone modifications are introduced.     

Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes are implicated in many areas of chromosome biology. However, the physiological role of many of these enzymes is still unclear. In budding yeast, the Isw2 complex slides nucleosomes along DNA. By analyzing the native chromatin structure of Isw2 targets, we have found that nucleosomes adopt default, DNA-directed positions when ISW2 is deleted. We provide evidence that Isw2 targets contain DNA sequences that are inhibitory to nucleosome formation and that these sequences facilitate the formation of nuclease-accessible open chromatin in the absence of Isw2. Our data show that the biological function of Isw2 is to position nucleosomes onto unfavorable DNA. These results reveal that antagonistic forces of Isw2 and the DNA sequence can control nucleosome positioning and genomic access in vivo.     

Delineation of the protein module that anchors HMGN proteins to nucleosomes in the chromatin of living cells

Numerous nuclear proteins bind to chromatin by targeting unique DNA sequences or specific histone modifications. In contrast, HMGN proteins recognize the generic structure of the 147-bp nucleosome core particle. HMGNs alter the structure and activity of chromatin by binding to nucleosomes; however, the determinants of the specific interaction of HMGNs with chromatin are not known. Here we use systematic mutagenesis, quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, fluorescence imaging, and mobility shift assays to identify the determinants important for the specific binding of these proteins to both the chromatin of living cells and to purified nucleosomes. We find that several regions of the protein affect the affinity of HMGNs to chromatin; however, the conserved sequence RRSARLSA, is the sole determinant of the specific interaction of HMGNs with nucleosomes. Within this sequence, each of the 4 amino acids in the R-S-RL motif are the only residues absolutely essential for anchoring HMGN protein to nucleosomes, both in vivo and in vitro. Our studies identify a new chromatin-binding module that specifically recognizes nucleosome cores independently of DNA sequence or histone tail modifications.     

Chromosomal protein HMGN1 modulates histone H3 phosphorylation

Here we demonstrate that HMGN1, a nuclear protein that binds to nucleosomes and reduces the compaction of the chromatin fiber, modulates histone posttranslational modifications. In Hmgn1-/- cells, loss of HMGN1 elevates the steady-state levels of phospho-S10-H3 and enhances the rate of stress-induced phosphorylation of S10-H3. In vitro, HMGN1 reduces the rate of phospho-S10-H3 by hindering the ability of kinases to modify nucleosomal, but not free, H3. During anisomycin treatment, the phosphorylation of HMGN1 precedes that of H3 and leads to a transient weakening of the binding of HMGN1 to chromatin. We propose that the reduced binding of HMGN1 to nucleosomes, or the absence of the protein, improves access of anisomysin-induced kinases to H3. Thus, the levels of posttranslational modifications in chromatin are modulated by nucleosome binding proteins that alter the ability of enzymatic complexes to access and modify their nucleosomal targets.     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Piccolo NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex requires the Enhancer of Polycomb A domain and chromodomain to acetylate nucleosomes

Chromatin modification complexes are key gene regulatory factors which posttranslationally modify the histone component of chromatin with epigenetic marks. To address what features of chromatin modification complexes are responsible for the specific recognition of nucleosomes compared to naked histones, we have performed a functional dissection of the Esa1-containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Piccolo NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex. Our studies define the Piccolo determinants sufficient to assemble its three subunits into a complex as well as Piccolo determinants sufficient to specifically acetylate a chromatin template. We find that the conserved Enhancer of Polycomb A (EPcA) homology region of the Epl1 component and the N-terminal 165 amino acids of the Yng2 component of Piccolo are sufficient with Esa1 to specifically act on nucleosomes. We also find that the Esa1 chromodomain plays a critical role in Piccolo's ability to distinguish between histones and nucleosomes. In particular, specific point mutations in the chromodomain putative hydrophobic cage which strongly hinder growth in yeast greatly reduce histone acetyltransferase activity on nucleosome substrates, independent of histone methylation or other modifications. However, the chromodomain is not required for Piccolo to bind to nucleosomes, suggesting a role for the chromodomain in a catalysis step after nucleosome binding.     

Effect of histone acetylation on structure and in vitro transcription of chromatin.

n-Butyrate treatment of growing Hela cells produces a dramatic increase in the levels of histone acetylation. We have exploited this system to study the effect of histone acetylation on chromatin structure. Chromatin containing highly acetylated histones is more rapidly digested to acid-soluble material by DNase I, but not by micrococcal nuclease. The same pattern of nuclease sensitivity was exhibited by in vitro-assembled chromatin consisting of SV40 DNA Form I and the 2 M salt-extracted core histones from butyrate-treated cells. Using this very defined system, it was possible to demonstrate that acetylated nucleosomes do not have a greatly diminished stability. Stability was measured in terms of exhange of histone cores onto competing naked DNA or sliding of histone cores along ligated naked DNA. Finally, it was shown that acetylated nucleosomes are efficient inhibitors of in vitro RNA synthesis by the E. coli holoenzyme as well as by the mammalian polymerases A and B.     

Mechanisms of ATP dependent chromatin remodeling

The inter-relationship between DNA repair and ATP dependent chromatin remodeling has begun to become very apparent with recent discoveries. ATP dependent remodeling complexes mobilize nucleosomes along DNA, promote the exchange of histones, or completely displace nucleosomes from DNA. These remodeling complexes are often categorized based on the domain organization of their catalytic subunit. The biochemical properties and structural information of several of these remodeling complexes are reviewed. The different models for how these complexes are able to mobilize nucleosomes and alter nucleosome structure are presented incorporating several recent findings. Finally the role of histone tails and their respective modifications in ATP-dependent remodeling are discussed.     

Interactions between core histones and chromatin at physiological ionic strength

Addition of core histones to chromatin or chromatin core particles at physiological ionic strength results in soluble nucleohistone complexes when polyglutamic acid is included in the sample. The interaction between nucleosomes and added core histones is strong enough to inhibit nucleosome formation on a closed circular DNA in the same solution. Complexes consisting of core particles and core histones run as discrete nucleoprotein particles on polyacrylamide gels. Consistent with the electrophoretic properties of these particles, protein cross-linking with dimethyl suberimidate indicates that added core histones are bound as excess octamers. Histones in the excess octamers do not exchange with nucleosomal core histones at an ionic strength of 0.1 M and can be selectively removed from core particles by incubating the complexes in a solution containing sufficient DNA. Under conditions where added histones are confined to the surface of chromatin, the excess histones are mobile and can migrate onto a contiguous extension of naked DNA and form nucleosomes.