Inference methods for the conditional logistic regression model with longitudinal data

This paper considers inference methods for case-control logistic regression in longitudinal setups. The motivation is provided by an analysis of plains bison spatial location as a function of habitat heterogeneity. The sampling is done according to a longitudinal matched case-control design in which, at certain time points, exactly one case, the actual location of an animal, is matched to a number of controls, the alternative locations that could have been reached. We develop inference methods for the conditional logistic regression model in this setup, which can be formulated within a generalized estimating equation (GEE) framework. This permits the use of statistical techniques developed for GEE-based inference, such as robust variance estimators and model selection criteria adapted for non-independent data. The performance of the methods is investigated in a simulation study and illustrated with the bison data analysis.     

Bias-reduced estimators of conditional odds ratios in matched case-control studies with unmatched confounding

We study bias-reduced estimators of exponentially transformed parameters in general linear models (GLMs) and show how they can be used to obtain bias-reduced conditional (or unconditional) odds ratios in matched case-control studies. Two options are considered and compared: the explicit approach and the implicit approach. The implicit approach is based on the modified score function where bias-reduced estimates are obtained by using iterative procedures to solve the modified score equations. The explicit approach is shown to be a one-step approximation of this iterative procedure. To apply these approaches for the conditional analysis of matched case-control studies, with potentially unmatched confounding and with several exposures, we utilize the relation between the conditional likelihood and the likelihood of the unconditional logit binomial GLM for matched pairs and Cox partial likelihood for matched sets with appropriately setup data. The properties of the estimators are evaluated by using a large Monte Carlo simulation study and an illustration of a real dataset is shown. Researchers reporting the results on the exponentiated scale should use bias-reduced estimators since otherwise the effects can be under or overestimated, where the magnitude of the bias is especially large in studies with smaller sample sizes.     

Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model for Matched Case-Control Studies

A number of statistics have recently been proposed to asssess the fit of the multiple logistic regression model in both prospective and retrospective studies involving two independent samples as well as in cross sectional studies. These statistics are not appropriate for assessing fit with matched case-control studies. This paper presents methods for assessing fit for matched case-control studies. Both parametric and nonparametric approaches are suggested even though none are directly analogous to the statistics proposed in the unmatched situation. Several examples are included to illustrate the methods.     

Nonparametric correction for covariate measurement error in a stratified Cox model

Stratified Cox regression models with large number of strata and small stratum size are useful in many settings, including matched case-control family studies. In the presence of measurement error in covariates and a large number of strata, we show that extensions of existing methods fail either to reduce the bias or to correct the bias under nonsymmetric distributions of the true covariate or the error term. We propose a nonparametric correction method for the estimation of regression coefficients, and show that the estimators are asymptotically consistent for the true parameters. Small sample properties are evaluated in a simulation study. The method is illustrated with an analysis of Framingham data.     

Conditional and unconditional categorical regression models with missing covariates

We consider methods for analyzing categorical regression models when some covariates (Z) are completely observed but other covariates (X) are missing for some subjects. When data on X are missing at random (i.e., when the probability that X is observed does not depend on the value of X itself), we present a likelihood approach for the observed data that allows the same nuisance parameters to be eliminated in a conditional analysis as when data are complete. An example of a matched case-control study is used to demonstrate our approach.     

A general framework for two-stage analysis of genome-wide association studies and its application to case-control studies

Two-stage analyses of genome-wide association studies have been proposed as a means to improving power for designs including family-based association and gene-environment interaction testing. In these analyses, all markers are first screened via a statistic that may not be robust to an underlying assumption, and the markers thus selected are then analyzed in a second stage with a test that is independent from the first stage and is robust to the assumption in question. We give a general formulation of two-stage designs and show how one can use this formulation both to derive existing methods and to improve upon them, opening up a range of possible further applications. We show how using simple regression models in conjunction with external data such as average trait values can improve the power of genome-wide association studies. We focus on case-control studies and show how it is possible to use allele frequencies derived from an external reference to derive a powerful two-stage analysis. An illustration involving the Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium data shows several genome-wide-significant associations, subsequently validated, that were not significant in the standard analysis. We give some analytic properties of the methods and discuss some underlying principles.     

Conditional likelihood methods for haplotype-based association analysis using matched case-control data

Genetic epidemiologists routinely assess disease susceptibility in relation to haplotypes, that is, combinations of alleles on a single chromosome. We study statistical methods for inferring haplotype-related disease risk using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data from matched case-control studies, where controls are individually matched to cases on some selected factors. Assuming a logistic regression model for haplotype-disease association, we propose two conditional likelihood approaches that address the issue that haplotypes cannot be inferred with certainty from SNP genotype data (phase ambiguity). One approach is based on the likelihood of disease status conditioned on the total number of cases, genotypes, and other covariates within each matching stratum, and the other is based on the joint likelihood of disease status and genotypes conditioned only on the total number of cases and other covariates. The joint-likelihood approach is generally more efficient, particularly for assessing haplotype-environment interactions. Simulation studies demonstrated that the first approach was more robust to model assumptions on the diplotype distribution conditioned on environmental risk variables and matching factors in the control population. We applied the two methods to analyze a matched case-control study of prostate cancer.     

Use of external rates in nested case-control studies with application to the international radiation study of cervical cancer patients.

A method is proposed for analysis of nested case-control studies that combines the matched comparison of covariate values between cases and controls and a comparison of the observed numbers of cases in the nesting cohort with expected numbers based on external rates and average relative risks estimated from the controls. The former comparison is based on the conditional likelihood for matched case-control studies and the latter on the unconditional likelihood for Poisson regression. It is shown that the two likelihoods are orthogonal and that their product is an estimator of the full survival likelihood that would have been obtained on the total cohort, had complete covariate data been available. Parameter estimation and significance tests follow in the usual way by maximizing this product likelihood. The method is illustrated using data on leukemia following irradiation for cervical cancer. In this study, the original cohort study showed a clear excess of leukemia in the first 15 years after exposure, but it was not feasible to obtain dose estimates on the entire cohort. However, the subsequent nested case-control study failed to demonstrate significant differences between alternative dose-response relations and effects of time-related modifiers. The combined analysis allows much clearer discrimination between alternative dose-time-response models.     

Point-source modelling using matched case-control data

We describe an extension to matched case-control studies of the parametric modelling framework developed by Diggle (1990) and Diggle and Rowlingson (1994) to investigate raised risk around putative sources of environmental pollution. We use a conditional likelihood approach for the family of risk functions considered in Diggle and Rowlingson (1994). We show that the likelihood surface that results from these models may be highly irregular, and provide a Bayesian analysis in which we investigate the posterior distribution using Markov chain Monte Carlo. An analysis of one-one matched data that were collected to investigate the relationship between respiratory disease and distance to roads in East London is presented.     

Residual plots for log odds ratio regression models.

This article describes graphical diagnostic methods for log odds ratio regression models. To study the effects of an additional covariate on log odds ratio regression analysis, three types of residual plots based on weighted least squares (WLS) are discussed: (i) added variable plot (partial regression plot), (ii) partial residual plot, and (iii) augmented partial residual plot. These plots provide diagnostic procedures for identifying heterogeneity of error variances, outliers, or nonlinearity of the model. They are especially useful for clarifying whether including a covariate as a linear term is appropriate, or whether quadratic or other nonlinear transformations are preferable. A well-known data set for case-control studies is analyzed to illustrate the residual plots.     

A comparison of exact, mid-P, and score tests for matched case-control studies

A recently developed algorithm for generating the distribution of sufficient statistics for conditional logistic models can be put to a twofold use. First, it provides an avenue for performing inference for matched case-control studies that does not rely on the assumption of a large sample size. Second, joint distributions generated by this algorithm can be used to make comparisons of various inferential procedures that are free from Monte Carlo sampling errors. In this paper, these two features of the algorithm are utilized to compare small-sample properties of the exact, mid-P value, and score tests for a conditional logistic model with two unmatched binary covariates. Both uniparametric and multiparametric tests, performed at a nominal significance level of .05, were studied. It was found that the actual significance levels of the mid-P test tend to be closer to the nominal level when compared with those of the other two tests.     

Exact inference for matched case-control studies

In an epidemiological study with a small sample size or a sparse data structure, the use of an asymptotic method of analysis may not be appropriate. In this paper we present an alternative method of analyzing data for case-control studies with a matched design that does not rely on large-sample assumptions. A recursive algorithm to compute the exact distribution of the conditional sufficient statistics of the parameters of the logistic model for such a design is given. This distribution can be used to perform exact inference on model parameters, the methodology of which is outlined. To illustrate the exact method, and compare it with the conventional asymptotic method, analyses of data from two case-control studies are also presented.     

Sensitivity analysis for matched case-control studies

A sensitivity analysis in an observational study indicates the degree to which conclusions would be altered by hidden biases of various magnitudes. A method of sensitivity analysis previously proposed for cohort studies is extended for use in matched case-control studies with multiple controls, where slightly different derivations and calculations are required. Also discussed is a sensitivity analysis for case-control studies that have two distinct types of controls, say hospital and neighborhood controls, where the two types may be affected by different biases. For illustration, the method is applied to five case-control studies, including a study of herniated lumbar disc in which there are three types of cases, and a study of breast cancer with two types of controls.     

A Gaussian copula approach for the analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies

In many case-control genetic association studies, a set of correlated secondary phenotypes that may share common genetic factors with disease status are collected. Examination of these secondary phenotypes can yield valuable insights about the disease etiology and supplement the main studies. However, due to unequal sampling probabilities between cases and controls, standard regression analysis that assesses the effect of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on secondary phenotypes using cases only, controls only, or combined samples of cases and controls can yield inflated type I error rates when the test SNP is associated with the disease. To solve this issue, we propose a Gaussian copula-based approach that efficiently models the dependence between disease status and secondary phenotypes. Through simulations, we show that our method yields correct type I error rates for the analysis of secondary phenotypes under a wide range of situations. To illustrate the effectiveness of our method in the analysis of real data, we applied our method to a genome-wide association study on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), where "cases" are defined as individuals with extremely high HDL-C level and "controls" are defined as those with low HDL-C level. We treated 4 quantitative traits with varying degrees of correlation with HDL-C as secondary phenotypes and tested for association with SNPs in LIPG, a gene that is well known to be associated with HDL-C. We show that when the correlation between the primary and secondary phenotypes is >0.2, the P values from case-control combined unadjusted analysis are much more significant than methods that aim to correct for ascertainment bias. Our results suggest that to avoid false-positive associations, it is important to appropriately model secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies.     

Sampling for conditional inference on case-control data

The problem of exact conditional inference for discrete multivariate case-control data has two forms. The first is grouped case-control data, where Monte Carlo computations can be done using the importance sampling method of Booth and Butler (1999, Biometrika86, 321-332), or a proposed alternative sequential importance sampling method. The second form is matched case-control data. For this analysis we propose a new exact sampling method based on the conditional-Poisson distribution for conditional testing with one binary and one integral ordered covariate. This method makes computations on data sets with large numbers of matched sets fast and accurate. We provide detailed derivation of the constraints and conditional distributions for conditional inference on grouped and matched data. The methods are illustrated on several new and old data sets.     

Matched Case—Control Data Analysis with Selection Bias

Case-control studies offer a rapid and efficient way to evaluate hypotheses. On the other hand, proper selection of the controls is challenging, and the potential for selection bias is a major weakness. Valid inferences about parameters of interest cannot be drawn if selection bias exists. Furthermore, the selection bias is difficult to evaluate. Even in situations where selection bias can be estimated, few methods are available. In the matched case-control Northern Manhattan Stroke Study (NOMASS), stroke-free controls are sampled in two stages. First, a telephone survey ascertains demographic and exposure status from a large random sample. Then, in an in-person interview, detailed information is collected for the selected controls to be used in a matched case-control study. The telephone survey data provides information about the selection probability and the potential selection bias. In this article, we propose bias-corrected estimators in a case-control study using a joint estimating equation approach. The proposed bias-corrected estimate and its standard error can be easily obtained by standard statistical software.     

Methods for the Analyses of Case-Cohort Studies

Case-cohort and nested case-control sampling methods have recently been introduced as a means of reducing cost in large cohort studies. The asymptotic distribution theory results for relative rate estimation based on Cox type partial or pseudolikelihoods for case-cohort and nested case-control studies have been accounted for. However, many researchers use (stratified) frequency table methods for a first or primary summarization of the most important evidence on exposure-disease or dose-response relationships, i.e. the classical Mantel-Haenszel analyses, trend tests and tests for heterogeneity of relative rates. These can be followed by exponential failure time regression methods on grouped or individual data to model relationships between several factors and response. In this paper we present the adaptations needed to use these methods with case-cohort designs, illustrating their use with data from a recent case-cohort study on the relationship between diet, life-style and cancer. We assume a very general setup allowing piecewise constant failure rates, possible recurrent events per individual, independent censoring and left truncation.     

Synthesis of evidence from epidemiological studies with interval-censored exposure due to grouping

We describe a method for assessing dose-response effects from a series of case-control and cohort studies in which the exposure information is interval censored. The interval censoring of the exposure variable is dealt with through the use of retrospective models in which the exposure is treated as a multinomial response and disease status as a binary covariate. Polychotomous logistic regression models are adopted in which the dose-response relationship between exposure and disease may be modeled in a discrete or continuous fashion. Partial conditioning is possible to eliminate some of the nuisance parameters. The methods are applied to the motivating study of the relationship between chorionic villus sampling and the occurrence of terminal transverse limb reduction.     

Statistical methods for analysis of radiation effects with tumor and dose location-specific information with application to the WECARE study of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer

Summary .  Methods for the analysis of individually matched case-control studies with location-specific radiation dose and tumor location information are described. These include likelihood methods for analyses that just use cases with precise location of tumor information and methods that also include cases with imprecise tumor location information. The theory establishes that each of these likelihood based methods estimates the same radiation rate ratio parameters, within the context of the appropriate model for location and subject level covariate effects. The underlying assumptions are characterized and the potential strengths and limitations of each method are described. The methods are illustrated and compared using the WECARE study of radiation and asynchronous contralateral breast cancer.     

A score test for determining sample size in matched case-control studies with categorical exposure

The paper considers the problem of determining the number of matched sets in 1 : M matched case-control studies with a categorical exposure having k + 1 categories, k > or = 1. The basic interest lies in constructing a test statistic to test whether the exposure is associated with the disease. Estimates of the k odds ratios for 1 : M matched case-control studies with dichotomous exposure and for 1 : 1 matched case-control studies with exposure at several levels are presented in Breslow and Day (1980), but results holding in full generality were not available so far. We propose a score test for testing the hypothesis of no association between disease and the polychotomous exposure. We exploit the power function of this test statistic to calculate the required number of matched sets to detect specific departures from the null hypothesis of no association. We also consider the situation when there is a natural ordering among the levels of the exposure variable. For ordinal exposure variables, we propose a test for detecting trend in disease risk with increasing levels of the exposure variable. Our methods are illustrated with two datasets, one is a real dataset on colorectal cancer in rats and the other a simulated dataset for studying disease-gene association.