Vision-based innate aversion to ants and ant mimics

Innate vision-based aversions to model and mimic were investigatedusing a mimicry system in which the models were ants (Formicidae),and both the mimics and the predators were jumping spiders (Salticidae).Jumping spiders are a large group of predatory invertebratesthat usually prey opportunistically on prey of similar size.We used 12 representative species from this group, the "ordinarysalticids" as predators. The mimics considered belonged to anothergroup, salticids that resemble ants. A choice arena containingan empty chamber and a stimulus chamber was used for testingpredator responses to a variety of dead arthropods (ants, antmimics, and an array of non–ant-like species) mountedin a lifelike posture. When presented with visual cues fromarthropods other than ants or ant-like salticids, naive predatorschose the empty chamber no more often than the stimulus chamber.However, when visual cues were from ants or from ant-like salticids,ordinary salticids chose the empty chamber significantly moreoften than the stimulus chamber. These findings suggest learningby the predator is not necessary in order for ant-like salticidsto gain Batesian mimicry advantages.     

Mimicry complex in two central European zodariid spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): how Zodarion deceives ants

Ant-eating spiders, Zodarion germanicum and Z. rubidum , were found to resemble ants structurally (size, colour, setosity) and behaviourally (ant-like movement, antennal illusion). Zodarion germanicum mimics large dark ants, such as Formica cinerea , whereas Z. rubidum resembles red ants, e.g. Myrmica sabuleti . Thus, these spiders are generalized Batesian mimics. The two spiders use aggressive mimicry during prey capture. When a spider carries a captured ant it will try to pass by approaching ants using special deceiving behaviour, which is based on imitation of ants' nestmate recognition. The spider first taps the antennae of the curious ant with its front legs (transmitting a tactile cue), then exposes its prey (the ant corpse) which the ant antennates (thus the corpse transmits an olfactory cue). The distal part of the front legs of Zodarion are almost without macrosetae similar to the antennae of ants. Additionally, all the other legs are covered with flattened incised setae, which imitate the dense setosity of ants' limbs. These remarkable microstructural imitations are believed to improve imitation of tactile signals by spiders. Moreover, by tapping, zodariids can presumably recognize the approaching intruder and decide whether to undertake the risk of deception or to run away. © 2002 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2002, 75 , 517–532.     

Why are there good and poor mimics?

Among the many Batesian mimetic hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) some have a very precise resemblance to the presumed model ('good' or 'specific' mimics) while others have a much less precise resemblance ('poor' or 'general' mimics). Intuitively one might expect that the specific mimics would be commoner and more successful than the general mimics. However, many specific mimics (e.g. Serkomyia silentis, Volucella bombylans) are quite rare, while general mimics are common (e.g. Syrphus ribesii, Episyrphus balteatus and Eristalis intricarius). Similarly, some ant-mimicking spiders from several different families are very good morphological and behavioural mimics of just one species of ant while others have a less detailed resemblance to ants in general. Six hypotheses are presented to explain the occurrence of so many poor mimics, and a theoretical model is outlined (the multi-model hypothesis) which shows how a poor general mimic can have a larger population than a good, specific mimic. This hypothesis may apply to some species of hoverfly and to some ant-mimicking spiders.     

Can ant‐eating Zodarion spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae) develop on a diet optimal for euryphagous arthropod predators?

Abstract Little attention is paid to the behavioural and physiological adaptations of ant‐eating predators. It is expected that there should be a strong selection for traits related to prey handling, leading to the evolution of morphological, behavioural and nutritional adaptations. Such adaptations may then entail trade‐offs in handling and utilization of alternative prey. To investigate behavioural as well as nutritional adaptations and the occurrence of the corresponding trade‐offs in two ant‐eating spiders of the genus Zodarion [Zodarion atlanticum Pekár & Cardoso and Zodarion germanicum (C. L. Koch)], spiders are reared on two diets: ants (i.e. their preferred prey) and fruit flies (i.e. an alternative prey that is nutritionally optimal for euryphagous spiders). Food consumption is observed and several fitness‐related life‐history parameters are measured. Although spiders readily accept ants, more than one‐third of 35 spiders refuse to consume fruit flies and starve. Furthermore, severe hunger does not induce these individuals to accept fruit flies. Starving spiders die before moulting to the second stadium. Spiders that eat fruit flies increase only little and slowly in weight, and all of these die during the first two stadia. By contrast, spiders on an ant diet increase dramatically in weight, and develop up to the fourth stadium. These data indicate that fruit flies are not suitable for Zodarion, supporting the hypothesis that there are behavioural and nutritional trade‐offs. Taking into account the results of previous studies, it is suggested that nutritional trade‐offs are generally important for stenophagous spiders.     

Salticid predation as one potential driving force of ant mimicry in jumping spiders

Many spiders possess myrmecomorphy, and species of the jumping spider genus Myrmarachne exhibit nearly perfect ant mimicry. Most salticids are diurnal predators with unusually high visual acuity that prey on various arthropods, including conspecifics. In this study, we tested whether predation pressure from large jumping spiders is one possible driving force of perfect ant mimicry in jumping spiders. The results showed that small non-ant-mimicking jumping spiders were readily treated as prey by large ones (no matter whether heterospecific or conspecific) and suffered high attack and mortality rates. The size difference between small and large jumping spiders significantly affected the outcomes of predatory interactions between them: the smaller the juvenile jumping spiders, the higher the predation risk from large ones. The attack and mortality rates of ant-mimicking jumping spiders were significantly lower than those of non-ant-mimicking jumping spiders, indicating that a resemblance to ants could provide protection against salticid predation. However, results of multivariate behavioural analyses showed that the responses of large jumping spiders to ants and ant-mimicking salticids differed significantly. Results of this study indicate that predation pressure from large jumping spiders might be one selection force driving the evolution of nearly perfect myrmecomorphy in spiders and other arthropods.     

Compound mimicry and trading predators by the males of sexually dimorphic Batesian mimics

Sexual dimorphism is pronounced in Myrmarachne, a large genus of ant-like jumping spiders (Salticidae) and one of the major animal groups in which Batesian mimicry of ants has evolved. Although adult females and juveniles of both sexes are distinctly ant-like in appearance, Myrmarachne males have elongated chelicerae that might appear to detract from their resemblance to ants. Experimental findings suggest that the Myrmarachne male's solution is to adopt compound mimicry (i.e. the male's model seems to be not simply an ant worker but a combination of an ant and something carried in the ant's mandibles: an "encumbered ant"). By becoming a mimic of a particular subset of worker ants, Myrmarachne males may have retained their Batesian-mimicry defence against ant-averse predators, but at the price of receiving the unwanted attention of predators for which encumbered ants are preferred prey. Two salticid species were used as predators in the experiments. Portia fimbriata is known to choose other salticids as preferred prey and to avoid unencumbered ants and their mimics (Myrmarachne females). In experiments reported here, P. fimbriata avoided encumbered ants and Myrmarachne males. Ants are the preferred prey of Chalcotropis gulosus. In our experiments, C. gulosus chose safer encumbered ants in preference to more dangerous unencumbered ants, chose Myrmarachne males more often than Myrmarachne females and showed no evidence of distinguishing between Myrmarachne males and encumbered ants. The cost of reconciling sexual dimorphism with Batesian mimicry appears to be that Myrmarachne males attract the unwanted attention of specialist predators of their compound model.     

Innate aversion to ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ant mimics: experimental findings from mantises (Mantodea)

Field data suggest that ants may be important predators of mantises which, in turn, may be important predators of jumping spiders (Salticidae). Using a tropical fauna from the Philippines as a case study, the reactions of mantises to ants, myrmecomorphic salticids (i.e. jumping spiders that resemble ants) and ordinary salticids (i.e. jumping spiders that do not resemble ants) were investigated in the laboratory. Three mantis species ( Loxomantis sp., Orthodera sp., and Statilia sp.) were tested with ten ant species, five species of Myrmarachne (i.e. myrmecomorphic salticids), and 23 ordinary salticid species. Two categories of the myrmecomorphic salticids were recognized: (1) 'typical Myrmarachne ' (four species with a strong resemblance to ants) and (2) Myrmarachne bakeri (a species with less strong resemblance to ants). Ants readily killed mantises in the laboratory, confirming that, for the mantises studied, ants are dangerous. In alternate-day testing, the mantises routinely preyed on the ordinary salticids, but avoided ants. The mantises reacted to myrmecomorphic salticids similarly to how they reacted to ants (i.e. myrmecomorphic salticids appear to be, for mantises, Batesian mimics of ants). Although myrmecomorphic salticids were rarely eaten, M . bakeri was eaten more often than typical Myrmarachne . Because the mantises had no prior experience with ants, ant mimics or ordinary salticids, our findings suggest that mantises have an innate aversion to attacking ants and that this aversion is generalized to myrmecomorphic salticids even in the absence of prior experience with ants. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 88 , 23–32.     

The adaptive bases of ant-mimicry in a neotropical aphantochilid spider (Araneae: Aphantochilidae)

The aphantochilid spider Aphanlochilus rogersi accurately mimics black ants of tribe Cephalotini, and is commonly found in the neighbourhood of its models' nests. The mimic seems to be a specialized predator of this type of ant, rejecting any insect offered as prey other than cephalotines. In the field, A. rogersi was observed preying on the model species Zacryptocerus pusillus. In captivity, the spider preyed on the models Z. pusillus and Z. depressus, as well as on the yellow non-model Z. clypeatus. Recognition of correct prey by A. rogersi appears to be based primarily on visual and tactile stimuli. Capturing ant prey from behind was the most common attack tactic observed in A. rogersi, and is probably safer than frontal attacks, as in this case the spider can be bitten on the legs before the ant is immobilized. Aphanlochilus rogersi, when feeding on the hard-bodied ant models, uses the ant corpses as a ‘protective shield’ against patrolling ants of the victim's colony and resembles an ant carrying a dead companion. Certain types of mimetic traits in A. rogersi (close similarity to ant models in integument texture and pilosity of body and legs), together with ‘shielding behaviour’, are thought to function as ant-deceivers, facilitating the obligatory intimate contact the mimic must make with cephalotines in order to capture a prey among other ants. The close similarity in the arrangement of dorsal spines, body shape, integument brightness and locomotion, together with antennal illusion, is regarded as a strategy of A. rogersi for deceiving visually-hunting predators that avoid its sharp spined ant models. It is proposed that ant-mimicry in A. rogersi has both an aggressive and a Batesian adaptive component, and evolved as a result of combined selective pressures exerted both by Cephalotini ant models (through defensive behaviour towards the mimics which attack them) and predators that avoid cephalotines (through predatory behaviour toward imperfect mimics). This suggestion is schematized and discussed in terms of two tripartite mimicry systems.     

Ant mimicry lessens predation on a North American jumping spider by larger salticid spiders

Ant-like appearance (myrmecomorphy) has evolved >70 times in insects and spiders, accounting for >2,000 species of myrmecomorphic arthropods. Most myrmecomorphic spiders are considered to be Batesian mimics; that is, a palatable spider avoids predation through resemblance to an unpalatable ant-although this presumption has been tested in relatively few cases. Here we explicitly examined the extent to which Peckhamia picata (Salticidae), a North American ant-mimicking jumping spider, is protected from four species of jumping spider predators, relative to nonmimetic salticids and model ants. In addition, we conducted focused behavioral observations on one salticid predator, Thiodina puerpera, to determine the point at which the predators' behaviors toward model, mimic, and nonmimic diverge. We also examined the behaviors of Peckhamia in the presence of Thiodina. We found that mimetic jumping spiders were consumed less than a third as often as nonmimetic jumping spiders, suggesting that Peckhamia does indeed gain protection as a result of its resemblance to ants, and so can be considered a Batesian mimic. Furthermore, our focal predator did not consume any ant-mimicking spiders, and seemed to categorize Peckhamia with its model ant early in the hunting sequence. Such early determination of prey versus nonprey may be the result of speed-accuracy trade-offs in predator decision-making.     

Similar yet different: differential response of a praying mantis to ant‐mimicking spiders

Batesian mimics typically dupe visual predators by resembling noxious or deadly model species. Ants are unpalatable and dangerous to many arthropod taxa, and are popular invertebrate models in mimicry studies. Ant mimicry by spiders, especially jumping spiders, has been studied and researchers have examined whether visual predators can distinguish between the ant model, spider mimic and spider non‐mimics. Tropical habitats harbour a diverse community of ants, their mimics and predators. In one such tripartite mimicry system, we investigated the response of an invertebrate visual predator, the ant‐mimicking praying mantis (Euantissa pulchra), to two related ant‐mimicking spider prey of the genus Myrmarachne, each closely mimicking its model ant species. We found that weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina) were much more aggressive than carpenter ants (Camponotus sericeus) towards the mantis. Additionally, mantids exhibited the same aversive response towards ants and their mimics. More importantly, mantids approached carpenter ant‐mimicking spiders significantly more than often that they approached weaver ant‐mimicking spiders. Thus, in this study, we show that an invertebrate predator, the praying mantis, can indeed discriminate between two closely related mimetic prey. The exact mechanism of the discrimination remains to be tested, but it is likely to depend on the level of mimetic accuracy by the spiders and on the aggressiveness of the ant model organism.     

An orb‐weaver spider eludes plant‐defending acacia ants by hiding in plain sight

相似文献   

Jumping spiders (Salticidae) enhance the seed production of a plant with extrafloral nectaries

Many plants secrete nectar from extrafloral nectaries (EFNs), specialized structures that usually attract ants which can act as plant defenders. We examined the nectar-mediated interactions between Chamaecrista nictitans (Caesalpineaceae) and jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae) for 2 years in old fields in New Jersey, USA. Previous research suggests that spiders are entirely carnivorous, yet jumping spiders (Eris sp. and Metaphidippus sp.) on C. nictitans collected nectar in addition to feeding on herbivores, ants, bees, and other spiders. In a controlled-environment experiment, when given a choice between C. nictitans with or without active EFNs, foraging spiders spent 86% of their time on plants with nectar. C. nictitans with resident jumping spiders did set significantly more seed than plants with no spiders, indicating a beneficial effect from these predators. However, the presence of jumping spiders did not decrease numbers of Sennius cruentatus (Bruchidae), a specialist seed predator of C. nictitans. Jumping spiders may provide additional, unexpected defense to plants possessing EFNs. Plants with EFNs may therefore have beneficial interactions with other arthropod predators in addition to nectar-collecting ants. Received: 27 May 1998 / Accepted: 23 December 1998     

The comparative study of the predatory behaviour of Myrmarachne, ant-like jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)

The predatory behaviour of 31 species of Myrmarachne , ant-like salticids, was studied in the laboratory and the field. The ant-like morphology and locomotion of these spiders appears to function primarily in Batesian mimicry. No evidence was found of Myrmarachne feeding on ants. However, predatory sequences were found to differ considerably from those typical of salticids. Instead of stalking and leaping on prey, Myrmarachne lunged at prey from close range. Myrmarachne used its legs I to tap prey before lunging, another unusual behaviour for a salticid. Myrmarachne fed on a wide range of arthropod prey in nature and the laboratory, but appears to be especially efficient at catching moths. Also, Myrmarachne tends to open up, or enter into, other spiders' nests and eat other spiders' eggs. Myrmarachne males were less efficient than females, in laboratory tests, at catching various types of arthropod prey, but they appear to be as efficient as females at oophagy. Myrmarachne tend to use webs of other spiders as nest sites, but no evidence was found of Myrmarachne preying on spiders in webs. It appears that the unusual features of Myrmarachne's predatory and nesting behaviour are important in enabling these spiders to preserve their ant-like appearance.     

田间施药对拟环纹豹蛛羧酸酯酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶分布及活性的影响

利用紫外分光光度法,对化学防治田(化防田)和生物防治田(生防田)中的拟环纹豹蛛Pardosa pseudoannulata体内乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)和羧酸酯酶(CarE)的分布及其活性进行了比较研究。结果表明,生防田拟环纹豹蛛身体各分部的AChE活性[包括头胸部1.251 nmol/(mg·min)、腹部0.467 nmol/(mg·min)和附肢0.760 nmol/(mg·min)]均高于化防田蜘蛛[包括头胸部0.895 nmol/(mg·min)、腹部0.445 nmol/(mg·min)和附肢0.724 nmol/(mg·min)],而生防田豹蛛的CarE活性[包括头胸部0.122 nmol/(mg·min)、腹部0.593 nmol/(mg·min)和附肢0.073 nmol/(mg·min)]均低于化防田蜘蛛[包括头胸部0.158 nmol/(mg·min)、腹部0.708 nmol/(mg·min)和附肢0.115 nmol/(mg·min)],说明化防田拟环纹豹蛛产生了一定程度的抗药性。拟环纹豹蛛体内的AChE主要集中在头胸部,CarE主要集中在腹部,这种分布特征是与其抗药性机制相适应的,并对其抗药性机制的形成做出了初步解释。这些结果也提示,拟环纹豹蛛对甲胺磷等农药的抗性不能在短期内形成,必须经历水稻→害虫→蜘蛛的较长的适应演化过程。     

Out of the Frying Pan and into the Fire: a Novel Trade-Off for Batesian Mimics

A mimicry system was investigated in which the models were ants (Formicidae) and both the mimics and the predators were jumping spiders (Salticidae). By using motionless lures in simultaneous‐presentation prey‐choice tests, how the predators respond specifically to the static appearance of ants and ant mimics was determined. These findings suggest a rarely considered adaptive trade‐off for Batesian mimics of ants. Mimicry may be advantageous when it deceives ant‐averse potential predators, but disadvantageous in encounters with ant‐eating specialists. Nine myrmecophagic (ant‐eating) species (from Africa, Asia, Australia and North America) and one araneophagic (spider‐eating) species (Portia fimbriata from Queensland) were tested with ants (five species), with myrmecomorphic (ant‐like) salticids (six species of Myrmarachne) and with non‐ant‐like prey (dipterans and ordinary salticids). The araneophagic salticid chose an ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than ants. Portia fimbriata also chose the ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than myrmecomorphic salticids. However, there was no significant difference in how P. fimbriata responded to ants and to myrmecomorphic salticids. The myrmecophagic salticids chose ants and chose myrmecomorphic salticids significantly more often than ordinary salticids and significantly more often than flies, but myrmecophagic salticids did not respond significantly differently to myrmecomorphic salticids and ants.     

Extraordinary Predation by the Neotropical Army Ant Cheliomyrmex andicola: Implications for the Evolution of the Army Ant Syndrome1

Workers of the genus Cheliomyrmex are unique among the New world army ants (subfamily Ecitoninae) in that their mandibles are armed with elongate, spine‐like teeth. We present the first prey records for this genus. Cheliomyrmex andicola prey on large‐bodied ground dwelling invertebrates and, possibly, on vertebrates. Unlike other army ants, C. andicola workers use their sting during prey capture. The workers' unusual mandibles and potent stings may be adapted for piercing and gripping the integument of nonarthropod prey animals, and for rapidly subduing large‐bodied prey, respectively. The genus Cheliomyrmex may be the sister taxon to other Neotropical army ants (Ecitoninae), and Cheliomyrmex shares features of mandibular morphology and prey selection with Old World driver ants in the genus Dorylus. Mass cooperative foraging, an important element of army ant behavior, may have arisen in part as an adaptation for exploiting large‐bodied prey.     

Aggressive use of Batesian mimicry by an ant-like jumping spider

Batesian and aggressive mimicry are united by deceit: Batesian mimics deceive predators and aggressive mimics deceive prey. This distinction is blurred by Myrmarachne melanotarsa, an ant-like jumping spider (Salticidae). Besides often preying on salticids, ants are well defended against most salticids that might target them as potential prey. Earlier studies have shown that salticids identify ants by their distinctive appearance and avoid them. They also avoid ant-like salticids from the genus Myrmarachne. Myrmarachne melanotarsa is an unusual species from this genus because it typically preys on the eggs and juveniles of ant-averse salticid species. The hypothesis considered here is that, for M. melanotarsa, the distinction between Batesian and aggressive mimicry is blurred. We tested this by placing female Menemerus sp. and their associated hatchling within visual range of M. melanotarsa, its model, and various non-ant-like arthropods. Menemerus is an ant-averse salticid species. When seeing ants or ant mimics, Menemerus females abandoned their broods more frequently than when seeing non-ant-like arthropods or in control tests (no arthropods visible), as predicted by our hypothesis that resembling ants functions as a predatory ploy.     

杀虫剂啶虫脒和毒死蜱对捕食蜘蛛血细胞DNA的损伤作用

应用蜘蛛血细胞微核试验和单细胞凝胶电泳试验研究了两种杀虫剂啶虫脒和毒死蜱对蜘蛛头胸部和腹部血细胞DNA的损伤作用。结果表明：在啶虫脒和毒死蜱各供试浓度作用下,对蜘蛛血细胞微核率有明显的影响,与对照组相比有显著性差异(p<0.05,p<0.01);且随着两种农药浓度升高,血细胞微核率显著增加,存在明显的剂量-效应关系(啶虫脒浓度与星豹蛛头胸部血细胞微核率相关系数r=0.9284,腹部为r=0.9071;毒死蜱与星豹蛛头胸部血细胞微核率相关系数r=0.9841,腹部为r=0.9793);啶虫脒和毒死蜱对星豹蛛血细胞DNA损伤有明显的剂量-效应关系(啶虫脒浓度与星豹蛛头胸部血细胞DNA损伤相关系数r=0.9838,腹部为r=0.9834;毒死蜱与星豹蛛头胸部血细胞DNA损伤相关系数r=0.9807,腹部为r=0.9659);且两种农药在同种农药同一浓度作用下,对星豹蛛腹部血细胞微核率和DNA损伤程度要明显大于头胸部。     

Consequences of sexual size dimorphism on energetics and locomotor performance of Grammostola rosea (Araneae; Teraphosidae)

Most male spiders are smaller than females; during sexual maturity, males change their behaviour, abandoning their web or nest to seek out receptive females actively, whereas females stalk prey near their web or nest and tend not to move away from it. Considering this behavioural difference to be associated with increased locomotor activity at maturity, it may be hypothesized that males will have traits that increase locomotor performance. The present study examines the kinetics and energetics of the movements of the mygalomorph spider Grammostola rosea Walckenaer, a large spider with sexual size dimorphism. It is found that males have a higher maximum aerobic speed, average speed, distance travelled and critical angle of climbing than females, indicating better performance. Males also have lower costs of transport than females. These results support the hypothesis that sexual dimorphism in wandering spiders with active males, which are characterized by smaller body size and longer legs than the larger and more static females, is associated with low transport cost, high velocity and better locomotor performance.     

Biology and behaviour of the neotropical ant-mimicking spider Aphantochilus rogersi (Araneae: Aphantochilidae): nesting, maternal care and ontogeny of ant-hunting techniques

Aphantochilus rogersi is an ant-mimicking spider that preys exclusively on cephalotine ants. The spiders oviposit in close proximity to nests of the model ant Zacryptocerus pusillus , and emergent spiderlings tend to remain in the vicinity of natal egg sacs. Females of A. rogersi actively defend their egg sacs against approaching workers of Z. pusillus , but the latter may sometimes destroy the eggs. Feeding specialization on these ants is confirmed by more than 300 observation of young and adult A. rogersi carrying ant corpses in the field. Although A. rogersi possesses several behavioural traits which may reduce the risk of being injured by ants during subjugation, field and laboratory observations showed that social defence by Z. pusillus may cause mutilation to the spiders. Tests in captivity revealed an ontogenetic change in the prey-capture techniques employed by A. rogersi. Early-instar spiderlings can apparently only seize the ant's petiole tightly if they are able to approach the ant from the front. As the ant is paralysed, the spiderling positions itself vertically in relation to the substratum. Larger spiders, on the other hand, attack ants most frequently from behind, and seem better equipped to seize the ant's petiole firmly with their larger chelicerae. Owing to their greater strength, late-instar spiders are able to lift the struggling ant aloft. The selection of a suitable oviposition site, the mother's ability to defend herself and the eggs from nearby ants, and the capacity to capture and subdue ants safely from emergence to maturity, are regarded as crucial traits inherent in the mimetic and feeding specialization by A. rogersi.