Inducing local DNA damage by visible light to study chromatin repair

Dynamics of DNA repair and recruitment of repair factors to damaged DNA can be studied by live cell microscopy. DNA damage is usually inflicted by a laser beam illuminating a DNA-interacting photosensitizer in a small area of the nucleus. We demonstrate that a focused beam of visible low intensity light alone can inflict local DNA damage and permit studies of DNA repair, thus avoiding potential artifacts caused by exogenous photosensitizers.     

Detection of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by filter elution is affected by nuclear chromatin structure

Chinese hamster ovary cells were irradiated with 250 kVp X rays and analyzed for the presence of DNA double-strand breaks using either polycarbonate filter elution or pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis at neutral pH. Reduction in DNA length detected by filter elution was produced as a nonlinear function of increasing radiation dose, with a quasi-threshold at low total dose, and as a first-order function of increasing radiation dose as detected by gel electrophoresis. The quasi-threshold observed with filter elution was eliminated when nuclei were isolated from irradiated cells and their chromatin relaxed in a buffer containing low-molarity monovalent cation prior to analysis by filter elution. The results suggest either that the chemical structure of the DNA double-strand breaks produced by low-LET radiation necessitates a DNA relaxation step before they can be detected accurately by filter elution, or that at low total radiation dose a DNA complex forms on the polycarbonate filter.     

The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex restores chromatin structure during UV DNA damage repair

Chromatin structure is modulated during deoxyribonucleic acid excision repair, but how this is achieved is unclear. Loss of the yeast Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex (Ino80-C) moderately sensitizes cells to ultraviolet (UV) light. In this paper, we show that INO80 acts in the same genetic pathway as nucleotide excision repair (NER) and that the Ino80-C contributes to efficient UV photoproduct removal in a region of high nucleosome occupancy. Moreover, Ino80 interacts with the early NER damage recognition complex Rad4-Rad23 and is recruited to chromatin by Rad4 in a UV damage-dependent manner. Using a modified chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we find that chromatin disruption during UV lesion repair is normal, whereas the restoration of nucleosome structure is defective in ino80 mutant cells. Collectively, our work suggests that Ino80 is recruited to sites of UV lesion repair through interactions with the NER apparatus and is required for the restoration of chromatin structure after repair.     

Identification of human genes involved in repair and tolerance of DNA damage

Summary An overview is presented on strategies of cloning mammalian DNA repair genes. Complementation of human and rodent repair defects and mutagen hypersensitivities by chromosome and DNA mediated gene transfer and mRNA microinjection is described, and the features of the cloned human DNA repair genes are summarized. It is shown that transfection of repair deficient cell lines with cloned bacterial and human genes may give rise to protection from the genotoxic effects of mutagens.Abbreviations MGMT O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase - MNNG N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine - HeCNU N-hydroxyethyl-N-chloroethylnitrosourea - MMC mitomycin C - MPA mycophenolic acid - ERCC excision-repair cross-complementing rodent UV-complementation group - UV ultraviolet light - XP xeroderma pigmentosum - CHO Chinese hamster ovary Dedicated to Prof. Dr. U. Hagen on the occasion of his 65th birthdayExtended version of an oral presentation given at the workshop Molecular Radiation Biology. German Section of the DNA Repair Network, München-Neuherberg, 21.–23.3.90     

Accessing DNA damage in chromatin: Preparing the chromatin landscape for base excision repair

DNA damage in chromatin comes in many forms, including single base lesions that induce base excision repair (BER). We and others have shown that the structural location of DNA lesions within nucleosomes greatly influences their accessibility to repair enzymes. Indeed, a difference in the location of uracil as small as one-half turn of the DNA backbone on the histone surface can result in a 10-fold difference in the time course of its removal in vitro. In addition, the cell has evolved several interdependent processes capable of enhancing the accessibility of excision repair enzymes to DNA lesions in nucleosomes, including post-translational modification of histones, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and interchange of histone variants in nucleosomes. In this review, we focus on different factors that affect accessibility of BER enzymes to nucleosomal DNA.     

The effect of chromatin decondensation on DNA damage and repair

The effects of chromatin compaction on X-radiation-induced cell killing and the induction and repair of DNA damage were studied in Chinese hamster ovary cells deprived of isoleucine for 24 h (Ile- cells) and compared to untreated controls. The results show that chromatin is decondensed in Ile- cells; i.e., in Ile- cells the nuclear area occupied by heterochromatin decreased 30-fold over control cells, both the rate and limit of micrococcal nuclease digestion were greater for Ile- cells, and 14.2% more propidium iodide was intercalated into the Ile- cell chromatin. The X-ray-induced cytotoxicity did not change in Ile- cells versus the control cells (D0 = 0.99 Gy) nor did the X-ray-induced DNA damage. However, the repair of DNA damage produced by 10 Gy proceeded with different kinetics in Ile- cells when compared to the controls. The initial rate of DNA damage repair was slower in Ile- cells by a factor of 2 compared to controls (the time required to rejoin 50% of the lesions was 6 versus 3 min, respectively). However, after 2 h of repair no DNA damage was detected in either group. Therefore, we conclude that this decondensation of chromatin, per se, does not directly modify the induction or ultimate repair of DNA damage by X radiation or cell clonogenicity and thus does not appear to be a primary factor in cell survival.     

SPOC1 modulates DNA repair by regulating key determinants of chromatin compaction and DNA damage response

Survival time-associated plant homeodomain (PHD) finger protein in Ovarian Cancer 1 (SPOC1, also known as PHF13) is known to modulate chromatin structure and is essential for testicular stem-cell differentiation. Here we show that SPOC1 is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in an ATM-dependent manner. Moreover, SPOC1 localizes at endogenous repair foci, including OPT domains and accumulates at large DSB repair foci characteristic for delayed repair at heterochromatic sites. SPOC1 depletion enhances the kinetics of ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) formation after γ-irradiation (γ-IR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair activity, and cellular radioresistance, but impairs homologous recombination (HR) repair. Conversely, SPOC1 overexpression delays IRIF formation and γH2AX expansion, reduces NHEJ repair activity and enhances cellular radiosensitivity. SPOC1 mediates dose-dependent changes in chromatin association of DNA compaction factors KAP-1, HP1-α and H3K9 methyltransferases (KMT) GLP, G9A and SETDB1. In addition, SPOC1 interacts with KAP-1 and H3K9 KMTs, inhibits KAP-1 phosphorylation and enhances H3K9 trimethylation. These findings provide the first evidence for a function of SPOC1 in DNA damage response (DDR) and repair. SPOC1 acts as a modulator of repair kinetics and choice of pathways. This involves its dose-dependent effects on DNA damage sensors, repair mediators and key regulators of chromatin structure.     

The role of chromatin proteins in DNA damage recognition and repair Mini-review

The structure of chromatin is the major factor determining the rate and efficiency of DNA repair. Chromatin remodeling events such as rearrangement of nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures are indispensable features of repair processes. During the last decade numerous chromatin proteins have been identified that preferentially bind to different types of DNA damage. The HMGB proteins, which preferentially interact with DNA intrastrand crosslinks induced by cisplatin, are the archetypal example of such proteins. Several hypothetical models have been proposed describing the role of such damage-binding chromatin proteins. The damage shielding model postulates that binding of chromatin proteins to damaged DNA might disturb damage recognition by repair factors and impair its removal. Alternatively, the damage-recognition/signaling model proposes that the binding of specific chromatin proteins to damaged DNA could serve as a hallmark to be recognized by repair proteins. Additionally, the binding of specific chromatin proteins to damaged DNA could induce chromatin remodeling at the damage site and indirectly affect its repair. This paper aims to critically review current experimental data in relation to such possible roles of chromatin proteins.