Conformational changes in switch I of EF‐G drive its directional cycling on and off the ribosome

We have trapped elongation factor G (EF-G) from Escherichia coli in six, functionally defined states, representing intermediates in its unidirectional catalytic cycle, which couples GTP hydrolysis to tRNA–mRNA translocation in the ribosome. By probing EF-G with trypsin in each state, we identified a substantial conformational change involving its conserved switch I (sw1) element, which contacts the GTP substrate. By attaching FeBABE (a hydroxyl radical generating probe) to sw1, we could monitor sw1 movement (by ∼20 Å), relative to the 70S ribosome, during the EF-G cycle. In free EF-G, sw1 is disordered, particularly in GDP-bound and nucleotide-free states. On EF-G•GTP binding to the ribosome, sw1 becomes structured and tucked inside the ribosome, thereby locking GTP onto EF-G. After hydrolysis and translocation, sw1 flips out from the ribosome, greatly accelerating release of GDP and EF-G from the ribosome. Collectively, our results support a central role of sw1 in driving the EF-G cycle during protein synthesis.     

Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

Structural basis for interaction of the ribosome with the switch regions of GTP-bound elongation factors

Elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes tRNA translocation on the ribosome. Here a cryo-EM reconstruction of the 70S*EF-G ribosomal complex at 7.3 A resolution and the crystal structure of EF-G-2*GTP, an EF-G homolog, at 2.2 A resolution are presented. EF-G-2*GTP is structurally distinct from previous EF-G structures, and in the context of the cryo-EM structure, the conformational changes are associated with ribosome binding and activation of the GTP binding pocket. The P loop and switch II approach A2660-A2662 in helix 95 of the 23S rRNA, indicating an important role for these conserved bases. Furthermore, the ordering of the functionally important switch I and II regions, which interact with the bound GTP, is dependent on interactions with the ribosome in the ratcheted conformation. Therefore, a network of interaction with the ribosome establishes the active GTP conformation of EF-G and thus facilitates GTP hydrolysis and tRNA translocation.     

The Identification of the Determinants of the Cyclic, Sequential Binding of Elongation Factors Tu and G to the Ribosome

Experiments dedicated to gaining an understanding of the mechanism underlying the orderly, sequential association of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and elongation factor G (EF-G) with the ribosome during protein synthesis were undertaken. The binding of one EF is always followed by the binding of the other, despite the two sharing the same—or a largely overlapping—site and despite the two having isosteric structures. Aminoacyl-tRNA, peptidyl-tRNA, and deacylated-tRNA were bound in various combinations to the A-site, P-site, or E-site of ribosomes, and their effect on conformation in the peptidyl transferase center, the GTPase-associated center, and the sarcin/ricin domain (SRD) was determined. In addition, the effect of the ribosome complexes on sensitivity to the ribotoxins sarcin and pokeweed antiviral protein and on the binding of EF-G•GTP were assessed. The results support the following conclusions: the EF-Tu ternary complex binds to the A-site whenever it is vacant and the P-site has peptidyl-tRNA; and association of the EF-Tu ternary complex is prevented, simply by steric hindrance, when the A-site is occupied by peptidyl-tRNA. On the other hand, the affinity of the ribosome for EF-G•GTP is increased when peptidyl-tRNA is in the A-site, and the increase is the result of a conformational change in the SRD. We propose that peptidyl-tRNA in the A-site is an effector that initiates a series of changes in tertiary interactions between nucleotides in the peptidyl transferase center, the SRD, and the GTPase-associated center of 23S rRNA; and that the signal, transmitted through a transduction pathway, informs the ribosome of the position of peptidyl-tRNA and leads to a conformational change in the SRD that favors binding of EF-G.     

EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis induces translocation accompanied by large conformational changes in the 70S ribosome.

Cryo-electron microscopy has been used to visualize elongation factor G (EF-G) on the 70S ribosome in GDP and GTP states. GTP hydrolysis is required for binding of all the domains of EF-G to the pretranslocational complex and for the completion of translocation. In addition, large conformational changes have been identified in the ribosome. The head of the 30S subunit shifts toward the L1 protein side, and the L7/L12 stalk becomes bifurcated upon EF-G binding. Upon GTP hydrolysis, the bifurcation is reversed and an arc-like connection is formed between the base of the stalk and EF-G.     

Crosslinking of translation factor EF-G to proteins of the bacterial ribosome before and after translocation

Elongation factor G (EF-G) promotes the translocation of tRNA and mRNA in the central cavity of the ribosome following the addition of each amino acid residue to a growing polypeptide chain. tRNA/mRNA translocation is coupled to GTP hydrolysis, catalyzed by EF-G and activated by the ribosome. In this study we probed EF-G interactions with ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) of the bacterial ribosome, by using a combination of chemical crosslinking, immunoblotting and mass spectroscopy analyses. We identified three bacterial r-proteins (L7/L12, S12 and L6) crosslinked to specific residues of EF-G in three of its domains (G', 3 and 5, respectively). EF-G crosslinks to L7/L12 and S12 were indistinguishable when EF-G was trapped on the ribosome before or after tRNA/mRNA translocation had occurred, whereas a crosslink between EF-G and L6 formed with greater efficiency before translocation had occurred. EF-G crosslinked to L7/L12 was capable of catalyzing multiple rounds of GTP hydrolysis, whereas EF-G crosslinked to S12 was inactive in GTP hydrolysis. These results imply that during the GTP hydrolytic cycle EF-G must detach from S12 within the central cavity of the ribosome, while EF-G can remain associated with L7/L12 located on one of the peripheral stalks of the ribosome. This mechanism may ensure that a single GTP molecule is hydrolyzed for each tRNA/mRNA translocation event.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

Binding Interaction between Tet(M) and the Ribosome: Requirements for Binding

Tet(M) protein interacts with the protein biosynthesis machinery to render this process resistant to tetracycline by a mechanism which involves release of the antibiotic from the ribosome in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis. To clarify this resistance mechanism further, the interaction of Tet(M) with the ribosome has been examined by using a gel filtration assay with radioactively labelled Tet(M) protein. The presence of GTP and 5′-guanylyl imido diphosphate, but not GDP, promoted Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Furthermore, thiostrepton, which inhibits the activities of elongation factor G (EF-G) and EF-Tu by binding to the ribosome, blocks stable Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Direct competition experiments show that Tet(M) and EF-G bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome.     

Possible evolution of factors involved in protein biosynthesis.

The elongation factors of protein biosynthesis are well preserved through out evolution. They catalyze the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis, where on the ribosome amino acids are added one at a time to a growing peptide according to the genetic information transcribed into mRNA. Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) provides the binding of aminoacylated tRNA to the ribosome and protects the aminoester bond against hydrolysis until a correct match between the codon on mRNA and the anticodon on tRNA can be achieved. Elongation factor G (EF-G) supports the translocation of tRNAs and of mRNA on the ribosome so that a new codon can be exposed for decoding. Both these factors are GTP binding proteins, and as such exist in an active form with GTP and an inactive form with GDP bound to the nucleotide binding domain. Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) will catalyze the exchange of nucleotide on EF-Tu. This review describes structural work on EF-Tu performed in our laboratory over the last eight years. The structural results provide a rather complete picture of the major structural forms of EF-Tu, including the so called ternary complex of aa-tRNA:EF-Tu:GTP. The structural comparison of this ternary complex with the structure of EF-G:GDP displays an unexpected macromolecular mimicry, where three domains of EF-G mimick the shape of the tRNA in the ternary complex. This observation has initiated much speculation on the evolution of all factors involved in protein synthesis, as well as on the details of the ribosomal function in one part of elongation.     

An elongation factor G-induced ribosome rearrangement precedes tRNA-mRNA translocation

The elongation cycle of protein synthesis is completed by translocation, a rearrangement during which two tRNAs bound to the mRNA move on the ribosome. The reaction is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G) and accelerated by GTP hydrolysis. Here we report a pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of translocation. The kinetic model suggests that GTP hydrolysis drives a conformational rearrangement of the ribosome that precedes and limits the rates of tRNA-mRNA translocation and Pi release from EF-G.GDP.Pi. The latter two steps are intrinsically rapid and take place at random. These results indicate that the energy of GTP hydrolysis is utilized to promote the ribosome rearrangement and to bias spontaneous fluctuations within the ribosome-EF-G complex toward unidirectional movement of mRNA and tRNA.     

Structure and function of FusB: an elongation factor G-binding fusidic acid resistance protein active in ribosomal translocation and recycling

Fusidic acid (FA) is a bacteriostatic antibiotic that locks elongation factor G (EF-G) to the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis during elongation and ribosome recycling. The plasmid pUB101-encoded protein FusB causes FA resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus through an interaction with EF-G. Here, we report 1.6 and 2.3 Å crystal structures of FusB. We show that FusB is a two-domain protein lacking homology to known structures, where the N-terminal domain is a four-helix bundle and the C-terminal domain has an alpha/beta fold containing a C4 treble clef zinc finger motif and two loop regions with conserved basic residues. Using hybrid constructs between S. aureus EF-G that binds to FusB and Escherichia coli EF-G that does not, we show that the sequence determinants for FusB recognition reside in domain IV and involve the C-terminal helix of S. aureus EF-G. Further, using kinetic assays in a reconstituted translation system, we demonstrate that FusB can rescue FA inhibition of tRNA translocation as well as ribosome recycling. We propose that FusB rescues S. aureus from FA inhibition by preventing formation or facilitating dissociation of the FA-locked EF-G–ribosome complex.     

The ribosomal stalk binds to translation factors IF2, EF-Tu, EF-G and RF3 via a conserved region of the L12 C-terminal domain

Efficient protein synthesis in bacteria requires initiation factor 2 (IF2), elongation factors Tu (EF-Tu) and G (EF-G), and release factor 3 (RF3), each of which catalyzes a major step of translation in a GTP-dependent fashion. Previous reports have suggested that recruitment of factors to the ribosome and subsequent GTP hydrolysis involve the dimeric protein L12, which forms a flexible "stalk" on the ribosome. Using heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy we demonstrate that L12 binds directly to the factors IF2, EF-Tu, EF-G, and RF3 from Escherichia coli, and map the region of L12 involved in these interactions. Factor-dependent chemical shift changes show that all four factors bind to the same region of the C-terminal domain of L12. This region includes three strictly conserved residues, K70, L80, and E82, and a set of highly conserved residues, including V66, A67, V68 and G79. Upon factor binding, all NMR signals from the C-terminal domain become broadened beyond detection, while those from the N-terminal domain are virtually unaffected, implying that the C-terminal domain binds to the factor, while the N-terminal domain dimer retains its rotational freedom mediated by the flexible hinge between the two domains. Factor-dependent variations in linewidths further reveal that L12 binds to each factor with a dissociation constant in the millimolar range in solution. These results indicate that the L12-factor complexes will be highly populated on the ribosome, because of the high local concentration of ribosome-bound factor with respect to L12.     

Thermodynamic Characterization of ppGpp Binding to EF-G or IF2 and of Initiator tRNA Binding to Free IF2 in the Presence of GDP, GTP, or ppGpp

In addition to their natural substrates GDP and GTP, the bacterial translational GTPases initiation factor (IF) 2 and elongation factor G (EF-G) interact with the alarmone molecule guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), which leads to GTPase inhibition. We have used isothermal titration calorimetry to determine the affinities of ppGpp for IF2 and EF-G at a temperature interval of 5-25 °C. We find that ppGpp has a higher affinity for IF2 than for EF-G (1.7-2.8 μM K_dversus 9.1-13.9 μM K_d at 10-25 °C), suggesting that during stringent response in vivo, IF2 is more responsive to ppGpp than to EF-G. We investigated the effects of ppGpp, GDP, and GTP on IF2 interactions with fMet-tRNA^fMet demonstrating that IF2 binds to initiator tRNA with submicromolar K_d and that affinity is altered by the G nucleotides only slightly. This—in conjunction with earlier reports on IF2 interactions with fMet-tRNA^fMet in the context of the 30S initiation complex, where ppGpp was suggested to strongly inhibit fMet-tRNA^fMet binding and GTP was suggested to strongly promote fMet-tRNA^fMet binding—sheds new light on the mechanisms of the G-nucleotide-regulated fMet-tRNA^fMet selection.     

Coupling of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G to translocation and factor recycling on the ribosome

The translocation step of elongation entails the coordinated movement of tRNA and mRNA on the ribosome. Translocation is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G) and accompanied by GTP hydrolysis, which affects both translocation and turnover of EF-G. Both reactions are much slower (50-100-fold) when GTP is replaced with non-hydrolyzable GTP analogues or GDP, indicating that the reaction rates are determined by conformational transitions induced by GTP hydrolysis. Compared to the rate of uncatalyzed, spontaneous translocation, ribosome binding of EF-G with any guanine nucleotide reduces the free energy of activation by about 18 kJ/mol, whereas GTP hydrolysis contributes another 10 kJ/mol. The acceleration by GTP hydrolysis is due to large decrease in activation enthalpy by about 30 kJ/mol, compared to the reaction with GTP analogues or GDP, whereas the activation entropy becomes unfavorable and is lowered by about 20 kJ/mol (37 degrees C). The data suggest that GTP hydrolysis induces, by a conformational change of EF-G, a rapid conformational rearrangement of the ribosome ("unlocking") which determines the rates of both tRNA-mRNA translocation and recycling of the factor.     

The location and the significance of a cross-link between the sarcin/ricin domain of ribosomal RNA and the elongation factor-G

During translocation peptidyl-tRNA moves from the A-site to the P-site and mRNA is displaced by three nucleotides in the 3' direction. This reaction is catalyzed by elongation factor-G (EF-G) and is associated with ribosome-dependent hydrolysis of GTP. The molecular basis of translocation is the most important unsolved problem with respect to ribosome function. A critical question, one that might provide a clue to the mechanism of translocation, is the precise identity of the contacts between EF-G and ribosome components. To make the identification, a covalent bond was formed, by ultraviolet irradiation, between EF-G and a sarcin/ricin domain (SRD) oligoribonucleotide containing 5-iodouridine. The cross-link was established, by mass spectroscopy and by Edman degradation, to be between a tryptophan at position 127 in the G domain in EF-G and either one of two 5-iodouridine nucleotides in the sequence UAG2655U in the SRD. G2655 is a critical identity element for the recognition of the factor's ribosomal binding site. The site of the cross-link provides the first direct evidence that the SRD is in close proximity to the EF-G catalytic center. The proximity suggests that the SRD RNA has a role in the activation of GTP hydrolysis that leads to a transition in the conformation of the factor and to its release from the ribosome.     

Structural insights into fusidic acid resistance and sensitivity in EF-G

Fusidic acid (FA) is a steroid antibiotic commonly used against Gram positive bacterial infections. It inhibits protein synthesis by stalling elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome after translocation. A significant number of the mutations conferring strong FA resistance have been mapped at the interfaces between domains G, III and V of EF-G. However, direct information on how such mutations affect the structure has hitherto not been available. Here we present the crystal structures of two mutants of Thermus thermophilus EF-G, G16V and T84A, which exhibit FA hypersensitivity and resistance in vitro, respectively. These mutants also have higher and lower affinity for GTP respectively than wild-type EF-G. The mutations cause significant conformational changes in the switch II loop that have opposite effects on the position of a key residue, Phe90, which undergoes large conformational changes. This correlates with the importance of Phe90 in FA sensitivity reported in previous studies. These structures substantiate the importance of the domain G/domain III/domain V interfaces as a key component of the FA binding site. The mutations also cause subtle changes in the environment of the "P-loop lysine", Lys25. This led us to examine the conformation of the equivalent residue in all structures of translational GTPases, which revealed that EF-G and eEF2 form a group separate from the others and suggested that the role of Lys25 may be different in the two groups.     

Control of phosphate release from elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12

Ribosomal protein L7/12 is crucial for the function of elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome. Here, we report the localization of a site in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of L7/12 that is critical for the interaction with EF-G. Single conserved surface amino acids were replaced in the CTD of L7/12. Whereas mutations in helices 5 and 6 had no effect, replacements of V66, I69, K70, and R73 in helix 4 increased the Michaelis constant (KM) of EF-G.GTP for the ribosome, suggesting an involvement of these residues in EF-G binding. The mutations did not appreciably affect rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis and had no effect on tRNA translocation on the ribosome. In contrast, the release of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from ribosome-bound EF-G.GDP.Pi was strongly inhibited and became rate-limiting for the turnover of EF-G. The control of Pi release by interactions between EF-G and L7/12 appears to be important for maintaining the conformational coupling between EF-G and the ribosome for translocation and for timing the dissociation of the factor from the ribosome.     

Observation of intersubunit movement of the ribosome in solution using FRET

Protein synthesis is believed to be a dynamic process, involving structural rearrangements of the ribosome. Cryo-EM reconstructions of certain elongation factor G (EF-G)-containing complexes have led to the proposal that translocation of tRNA and mRNA through the ribosome, from the A to P to E sites, is accompanied by a rotational movement between the two ribosomal subunits. Here, we have used F?rster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to monitor changes in the relative orientation of the ribosomal subunits in different complexes trapped at intermediate stages of translocation in solution. Binding of EF-G to the ribosome in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable GTP analogue GDPNP or GTP plus fusidic acid causes an increase in the efficiency of energy transfer between fluorophores introduced into proteins S11 in the 30 S subunit and L9 in the 50 S subunit, and a decrease in energy transfer between S6 and L9. Similar anti-correlated changes in energy transfer occur upon binding the GTP-requiring release factor RF3. These changes are consistent with the counter-clockwise rotation of the 30 S subunit relative to the 50 S subunit observed in cryo-EM studies. Reaction of ribosomal complexes containing the peptidyl-tRNA analogues N-Ac-Phe-tRNAPhe, N-Ac-Met-tRNAMet or f-Met-tRNAfMet with puromycin, conditions favoring movement of the resulting deacylated tRNAs into the P/E hybrid state, leads to similar changes in FRET. Conversely, treatment of a ribosomal complex containing deacylated and peptidyl-tRNAs bound in the A/P and P/E states, respectively, with EF-G.GTP causes reversal of the FRET changes. The use of FRET has enabled direct observation of intersubunit movement in solution, provides independent evidence that formation of the hybrid state is coupled to rotation of the 30 S subunit and shows that the intersubunit movement is reversed during the second step of translocation.     

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.     

Intramolecular Movements in EF-G, Trapped at Different Stages in Its GTP Hydrolytic Cycle, Probed by FRET

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is one of several GTP hydrolytic proteins (GTPases) that cycles repeatedly on and off the ribosome during protein synthesis in bacterial cells. In the functional cycle of EF-G, hydrolysis of guanosine 5′-triphosphate (GTP) is coupled to tRNA-mRNA translocation in ribosomes. GTP hydrolysis induces conformational rearrangements in two switch elements in the G domain of EF-G and other GTPases. These switch elements are thought to initiate the cascade of events that lead to translocation and EF-G cycling between ribosomes. To further define the coupling mechanism, we developed a new fluorescent approach that can detect intramolecular movements in EF-G. We attached a fluorescent probe to the switch I element (sw1) of Escherichia coli EF-G. We monitored the position of the sw1 probe, relative to another fluorescent probe anchored to the GTP substrate or product, by measuring the distance-dependent, Förster resonance energy transfer between the two probes. By analyzing EF-G trapped at five different functional states in its cycle, we could infer the cyclical movements of sw1 within EF-G. Our results provide evidence for conformational changes in sw1, which help to drive the unidirectional EF-G cycle during protein synthesis. More generally, our approach might also serve to define the conformational dynamics of other GTPases with their cellular receptors.